Cross-check

Last updated

In chess, a cross-check is a tactic in which a check is played in response to a check, especially when the original check is blocked by a piece that itself either delivers check or reveals a discovered check from another piece. Sometimes the term is extended to cover cases in which the king moves out of check and reveals a discovered check from another piece (this is also known as a royal check); it does not generally apply to cases where the original checking piece is captured.

Contents

The cross-check is an essential tactic in winning some endgames such as those with two queens versus one, or a queen and pawn versus a queen. In these cases, the defense usually tries for a perpetual check and sometimes the stronger side can stop it only by a cross-check.

Examples

A cross-check occurs from time to time in games. It is an essential tactic in winning endgames such as two queens versus one queen, or queen and pawn versus queen, where it is used to stop a series of checks from the opponent and force the exchange of queens. It is also used in some chess problems.

Botvinnik vs. Minev game

Botvinnik vs. Minev, 1954
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess oot45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess oot45.svg
Chess oot45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess xot45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black, to move, resigned. Black dots are where the black queen can check; white dots are where the white queen can cross-check in reply.

Cross-checks are rare in actual play, though they do occur, and in some endgames, particularly queen endgames, they are very important. The position shown to the right is the final position in the famous queen endgame from the game [1] between Mikhail Botvinnik and Nikolay Minev, Amsterdam Olympiad, 1954. In the position shown, after 91. Kc5!!, Black resigned because the promising looking checks 91...Qc7+, 91...Qg1+, 91...Qf2+ and 91...Qc2+ are answered by the cross-checks 92.Qc6+, 92.Qd4+, 92.Qd4+ and 92.Qc4+ respectively, forcing an exchange of queens in all cases, which will result in the promotion of the pawn and winning the game by a basic checkmate. This is an important theme in queen endgames: the weaker side often gives a series of checks, and it is frequently important for them to avoid simplifying cross-checks such as these in reply ( Burgess 2000 :102–3, 458–59), ( Golombek 1977 ). If the black queen attacks the pawn instead of checking it does no good since the promotion square of the pawn is protected by its queen.

Two queens versus one

Botvinnik vs. Ravinsky, 1944
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Black resigned after 126.Qf4+.
Possible continuation
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess oot45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Cross-check with 135.Qee8+ wins.

In the position on the left from Botvinnik–Ravinsky, [2] Black resigned. With best play according to the endgame tablebase, 126...Kb3 127.Qf7+ Ka4 128.g8=Q Qg4+ 129.Kh6 Qh4+ 130.Kg7 Qg3+ 131.Kf8 Qd6+ 132.Qe7 Qh6+ 133.Qgg7 Qf4+ 134.Qgf7 Qb8+ and the position on the right is reached. Then the cross-check 135.Qee8+ (or Qfe8+) forks the king and queen, forces an exchange, and wins the game.

Anderson problem, 1919

G.F. Anderson, 1919
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh

Cross-checks are relatively infrequent in actual play, but are popular in chess problems since they make for a relatively unobvious solution. In the problem shown to the right, White is to move and mate in two moves against any defence. It is by G.F. Anderson and was first published in Il Secolo in 1919. The key 1.Kd6, threatening 2.Qb7#, gives the black king two flight squares, and two of the variations exploit these: 1...Kb6 2.Bc2# and 1...Kb4 2.Kxc6#. The other two defences exploit the fact that the key exposes the white king to checks, and are answered by cross-checks: 1...Rg6+ 2.Be6# and 1...Rd3+ 2.Bd5#.

Anderson problem, 1961

G. F. Anderson, The Observer , 1961
abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh

The problem to the right, also by G. F. Anderson (first published in The Observer in 1961) and also a mate in two, features no fewer than five cross-checks. The key is 1.Qb6 (threat: 2.Ne4#), with the following variations:

1...exf6+ 2.Nb7#
1...exd6+ 2.Nd7#
1...Nd4+ 2.Rf5#
1...Nxd6+ 2.Nd3#
1...Nf-other+ 2.Ne4#
1...Kxf6 2.Qb2#
1...Kxd6 2.Rd4#

See also

Related Research Articles

In the game of chess, an endgame study, or just study, is a composed position—that is, one that has been made up rather than played in an actual game—presented as a sort of puzzle, in which the aim of the solver is to find the essentially unique way for one side to win or draw, as stipulated, against any moves the other side plays. If the study does not end in a mate or stalemate, it should be obvious that the game is either won or drawn, and White can have a selection of many different moves. There is no limit to the number of moves which are allowed to achieve the win; this distinguishes studies from the genre of direct mate problems. Such problems also differ qualitatively from the very common genre of tactical puzzles based around the middlegame, often based on an actual game, where a decisive tactic must be found.

Stalemate is a situation in the game of chess where the player whose turn it is to move is not in check and has no legal move. Stalemate results in a draw. During the endgame, stalemate is a resource that can enable the player with the inferior position to draw the game rather than lose. In more complex positions, stalemate is much rarer, usually taking the form of a swindle that succeeds only if the superior side is inattentive. Stalemate is also a common theme in endgame studies and other chess problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ulf Andersson</span> Swedish chess player

Ulf Andersson is a leading Swedish chess player. FIDE awarded him the International Master title in 1970 and the Grandmaster title in 1972.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kasparov versus the World</span> Game of chess

Kasparov versus the World was a game of chess played in 1999 over the Internet. It was a consultation game, in which a World Team of thousands decided each move for the black pieces by plurality vote, while Garry Kasparov conducted the white pieces by himself. More than 50,000 people from over 75 countries participated in the game.

In chess, a passed pawn is a pawn with no opposing pawns to prevent it from advancing to the eighth rank; i.e. there are no opposing pawns in front of it on either the same file or adjacent files. A passed pawn is sometimes colloquially called a passer. Passed pawns are advantageous because only the opponent's pieces can stop them from promoting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Promotion (chess)</span> A rule in chess

In chess, promotion is the replacement of a pawn with a new queen, rook, bishop, or knight of the same color. It occurs immediately when the pawn moves to its last rank, with the player choosing the piece of promotion. The new piece does not have to be a previously captured piece. Promotion is mandatory; the pawn cannot remain as a pawn.

In chess, a fortress is an endgame drawing technique in which the side behind in material sets up a zone of protection that the opponent cannot penetrate. This might involve keeping the enemy king out of one's position, or a zone the enemy cannot force one out of. An elementary fortress is a theoretically drawn position with reduced material in which a passive defense will maintain the draw.

In chess, a desperado piece is a piece that is either en prise or trapped, but captures an enemy piece before it is itself captured, or is used as a sacrifice that will result in stalemate if it is captured. The former case can arise in a situation where both sides have hanging pieces, in which case these pieces are used to win material prior to being captured. A desperado in the latter case is usually a rook or a queen; such a piece is sometimes also called crazy or mad.

The chess endgame of a queen versus pawn is usually an easy win for the side with the queen. However, if the pawn has advanced to its seventh rank it has possibilities of reaching a draw, and there are some drawn positions with the pawn on the sixth rank. This endgame arises most often from a race of pawns to promote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swindle (chess)</span> Chess maneuver

In chess, a swindle is a ruse by which players in a losing position trick their opponent and thereby achieve a win or draw instead of the expected loss. It may also refer more generally to obtaining a win or draw from a clearly losing position. I. A. Horowitz and Fred Reinfeld distinguish among "traps", "pitfalls", and "swindles". In their terminology, a "trap" refers to a situation where players go wrong through their own efforts. In a "pitfall", the beneficiary of the pitfall plays an active role, creating a situation where a plausible move by the opponent will turn out badly. A "swindle" is a pitfall adopted by a player who has a clearly lost game. Horowitz and Reinfeld observe that swindles, "though ignored in virtually all chess books", "play an enormously important role in over-the-board chess, and decide the fate of countless games".

A pawnless chess endgame is a chess endgame in which only a few pieces remain, and no pawns. The basic checkmates are types of pawnless endgames. Endgames without pawns do not occur very often in practice except for the basic checkmates of king and queen versus king, king and rook versus king, and queen versus rook. Other cases that occur occasionally are (1) a rook and minor piece versus a rook and (2) a rook versus a minor piece, especially if the minor piece is a bishop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deep Blue versus Garry Kasparov</span> Chess matches between Deep Blue and Kasparov

Deep Blue versus Garry Kasparov was a pair of six-game chess matches between the world chess champion Garry Kasparov and an IBM supercomputer called Deep Blue. The first match was played in Philadelphia in 1996 and won by Kasparov by 4–2. A rematch was played in New York City in 1997 and won by Deep Blue by 3½–2½. The second match was the first defeat of a reigning world chess champion by a computer under tournament conditions, and was the subject of a documentary film, Game Over: Kasparov and the Machine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nikolai Grigoriev</span>

Nikalai (Nikolay) Dmitrievich Grigoriev was a Russian chess player and a composer of endgame studies. He was born on 14 August 1895 in Moscow, and he died there in 1938.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Chess Championship 1889</span> Chess match between Wilheilm Steinitz and Mikhail Chigorin

The World Chess Championship 1889 was the second official World Chess Championship, and was between Wilhelm Steinitz and Mikhail Chigorin. It took place in Havana, Cuba. Steinitz successfully defended his world title, by being the first of the two players to reach 10½. He won the match 10½-6½.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Chess Championship 1960</span> Chess championship

The 1960 World Chess Championship was played between Mikhail Botvinnik and Mikhail Tal in Moscow from March 15 to May 7, 1960. Botvinnik was the reigning champion, after winning the World Chess Championship 1958, while Tal qualified by winning the Candidates tournament. Tal won by a margin of 4 points.

The queen and pawn versus queen endgame is a chess endgame in which both sides have a queen and one side has a pawn, which one tries to promote. It is very complicated and difficult to play. Cross-checks are often used as a device to win the game by forcing the exchange of queens. It is almost always a draw if the defending king is in front of the pawn.

<i>Chess</i> (poem) Book by Jan Kochanowski

Chess is a poem written by Jan Kochanowski, first published in 1564 or 1565. Inspired by Marco Girolamo Vida's Scacchia Ludus, it is a narrative poetry work that describes a game of chess between two men, Fiedor and Borzuj, who fight for the right to marry Anna, princess of Denmark. The poem anthropomorphises the pieces, presenting the game as a battle between two armies, in a style reminiscent of battle scenes in the works of Homer and Virgil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Botvinnik versus Capablanca, AVRO 1938</span>

In Rotterdam on 22 November 1938, then future World Chess Champion Mikhail Botvinnik defeated former World Champion José Raúl Capablanca in round 11 of the AVRO tournament in one of the most famous games in chess history. Garry Kasparov wrote:

[...] Botvinnik played what was altogether the "game of his life" against Capablanca. It was not just that it was judged the most brilliant in the tournament and to be worth two first prizes, but it was even suggested that, by analogy with the "immortal" and "evergreen" games, it should be called "peerless" or "classical"!

The 14th season of the Top Chess Engine Championship took place between 17 November 2018 and 24 February 2019. Stockfish was the defending champion, having defeated Komodo in the previous season's superfinal.

The staircase maneuver is a tactical motif which tends to occur in queen and pawn endgames, where the defender has advanced pawns on the seventh rank. The tactic employs the idea of alternation, with the attacking queen alternating between black and white squares until it reaches an open file, where the opponent's queening square is not controlled by one of the opponent's pawns. Thus the attacking queen alternates between a series of pins and checks until it delivers the final mate.

References

Bibliography

Further reading