Deafness in Russia

Last updated

Deafness in Soviet Russia experienced a cultural transformation following the Russian Revolution. The Soviet's collectivist ideology, termed New Soviet, promoted the integration of deaf people within a predominantly hearing civilization. Thus, state-sponsored organizations, such as All-Russian Society of the Deaf, fostered cultural and professional opportunities for Russia's deaf population.

Contents

Background

Prerevolutionary Russian culture considered deafness a crippling condition comparable with insanity and intellectual disability. [1] [2] Birthed from the prerevolutionary establishment of deaf schools, Russian deaf culture communalized said minority. [3] However, Russia's deaf education system struggled due to inconsistent government funding. [3] Thus, deaf schools relied on philanthropic contributions. [3] [1] The lack of government financing helped preserve Russian Sign Language during an oralist era. [3] Marginalized by the tsarist legal system, Russia's deaf population supported the Bolshevik revolution. [1] Soviet socialism promoted economic participation, thereby favoring physically able beings. [3]

Deaf cultural identity

The New Soviet ideology promoted unity through the personal surmounting of physical and social obstacles. [2] Thus, societal contribution superseded physical defects. [2] A dire need for laborers and an affirmative outlook on disabilities strengthened Russia's deaf communities. [2] [3] Furthermore, the deaf established themselves as able-bodied workers by highlighting the invisible nature of their disorder. [3] [2] Soviet ideologies allowed for the politicization of deaf community members. [4] [2] As a result, political collaboration fostered the development of deaf community identity. [2] However, the strengthening of Russia's deaf movement brought the invisible disorder to light. [2] The establishment of deaf-accessible spaces highlighted the deaf communities' otherness. [2] Furthermore, the deaf labeled themselves as medically disabled. [3] Thus, Russia's hearing communities lacked faith that the deaf could successfully overcome their impairment and become ideal New Soviet people. [4] [2]

To combat such stigma, deaf communities developed a social identity focused on self-sufficiency. [4] [2] The self-establishment of deaf culture highlights deaf community members' embracing of New Soviet values. [2] [4] In 1962, the Soviet government recognized deaf people's future capability of embodying the New Soviet ideal. [2] Thus, the late 1940s through 1970s represent a high point in Russian deaf history. [4] [2] However, Russia's deaf population struggled to prove their self-sufficiency. [2] A 1957 Izvestia article highlights the deaf population's acceptance of social welfare. [2] Furthermore, the deaf's ability to achieve New Soviet ideals came into question following Izvestia's publication of "Pygmalion." [2] This article reveals an unwillingness to assimilate into New Soviet culture among some of Russia's deaf population. [2] Additionally, "Pygmalion" notes comparatively increased deviance and economic nonparticipation among Russia's deaf. [2]

Ultimately, Russia's deaf population failed to transition into New Soviet culture. [2] In the 1960s, the deaf population's focus shifted to strengthening deaf communities, falling further into social seclusion. [2] Thus, a clear societal division saw the return of prerevolutionary deaf marginalization. [2] An article published in 1984 notes the medical use of "GN—UO," a prerevolutionary term meaning "Deaf-mute—Mentally Retarded." [2]

Education

Deaf education stabilized following consistent financial backing from the Soviet regime. [3] Additionally, the Soviet Union partitioned deaf schooling into the following categories: born entirely deaf, born partly deaf, late-deafened. [3] Such division increased social interaction and tailored language modalities to account for students' needs. [3] However, prerevolutionary oralism extended into the Soviet era. [3] The New Soviet's commitment to social and economic participation favored the speaking modality. [3] Russia's deaf population recognized the economic implications of sign-only communication. [3] Thus, Russia's deaf embraced both spoken and signed language modalities. [3]

Higher education was accessible to deaf students. [3] Furthermore, VOG organized vocational training workshops for the deaf. [2] With the state's support, VOG established deaf-only alternatives for on-site industrial-educational programs termed Rabfaks. [3]

Economy

The Soviet collectivist ideologies alleviated economic competition, thereby easing the deaf population's employment barriers. [3] In addition, by highlighting their physical capabilities, the deaf population realized greater employment opportunities than those with other disabilities. [3] According to Soviet theorist Lev Vygotsky, deaf laborers exhibit comparable working abilities to their hearing counterparts. [2] Thus, the deaf disorder's invisible nature aided in the economic advancement of Russia's deaf. [3] [2]

Through employment, the deaf approached New Soviet idealisms. [2] Thus, oralism's vocational advantages encouraged its acceptance among Russia's deaf population. [3]

Social

Following the Russian Revolution, communal urban areas saw an increased presence of deaf beings. [2] However, public signing illuminated the naturally invisible disorder that is deafness. [2] Thus, social disparities and public inaccessibility prompted the creation of deaf spaces. [2] Such spaces demonstrated the deaf's cultural, self-sufficient, and economic advancements. [2] Additionally, hearing people were encouraged to use these spaces. [2] Through social integration, the deaf wished to highlight their capability of New Soviet transformation. [2]

The deaf population benefited from Russia's cultural enthusiasm toward mime and theater. [4] [3] [2] Viewed as a natural setting for the deaf, theater highlighted deaf cultural sophistication. [4]

Public spaces

Distinguishable by a dense signing presence, deaf spaces encouraged public collaboration among Russia's deaf community members. [2] Language accessibility fostered a unique deaf identity that overlooked their physical inabilities. [2] Additionally, the deaf identity embodied labor capability, cultural advancement, and self-sufficiency. [4] [2] The construction of deaf spaces strengthened internal community ties and encouraged social engagement. [2] Furthermore, deaf spaces represented the deaf population's embracement of New Soviet values. However, congregated public signing illuminated the deaf disorder. [2] Thus, deaf spaces negatively influenced hearing society's impressions of the deaf by challenging Soviet uniformity. [2]

Theater

Theater represented a significant segment of Soviet culture. [2] [3] [4] Viewed as a natural atmosphere for the hard of hearing, theaters provided employment opportunities for Russia's deaf. [4] [3] Founded in 1957 with VOG's support, the Theatre Studio of Sign and Gesture trained deaf actors in various theatrical crafts. [4] Renamed Theatre of Sign and Gesture following governmental support in 1963, the theater highlighted the deaf population's cultural refinement. [4] [3] Through training, deaf actors proved skillfully equivalent to their hearing counterparts. [4] For example, deaf actors learned rhythm through musical vibrations. [4] Thus, through cultural advancements and showcasing their artistic capabilities, Russia's deaf population approached New Soviet idealisms. [4] [2]

Organizations

All-Russian Society of the Deaf (VOG)

Founded in 1926 by Ivan Savel'ev, VOG is a deaf-run organization initially backed by the Soviet state. [5] [3] [2] Originally centered around employment services, VOG established vocational training centers. [3] [2] Additionally, VOG's social clubs strengthened internal deaf community relations. [2] Striving to achieve New Soviet transformation, VOG extended its focus to include cultural advancement. [2] [3] [4] With governmental funding, VOG hosted deaf-only sporting events and art exhibitions. [3] Additionally, VOG organized the construction of various deaf spaces and cultural centers. [2] [3] Membership rates soared, reaching 96% among deaf Muscovites in 1949. [2] Valuing self-sufficiency, in 1954, VOG refused governmental funding after citing sufficient revenue. [5] [2] Self-sufficiency remained a reoccurring theme among VOG's projects through deaf-funding, deaf-labor, and deaf-leadership. [2] [4]

Furthermore, VOG worked closely with state officials to influence social politics on the deaf's behalf. [5] [3] In 1926, the Soviet government sponsored a deaf-for-deaf newspaper called The Life of a Deaf-Mute. [3] [5] The paper highlighted the deaf's political advancements by repeatedly criticizing the Soviet state without reprimand. [3] However, a lack of governmental pushback may represent a non-threatening perception of the deaf community. [3]

Related Research Articles

Autarky is the characteristic of self-sufficiency, usually applied to societies, communities, states, and their economic systems.

The three models of deafness are rooted in either social or biological sciences. These are the cultural model, the social model, and themedicalmodel. The model through which the deaf person is viewed can impact how they are treated as well as their own self perception. In the cultural model, the Deaf belong to a culture in which they are neither infirm nor disabled, but rather have their own fully grammatical and natural language. In the medical model, deafness is viewed undesirable, and it is to the advantage of the individual as well as society as a whole to "cure" this condition. The social model seeks to explain difficulties experienced by deaf individuals that are due to their environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disability</span> Impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions

Disability is the experience of any condition that makes it more difficult for a person to do certain activities or have equitable access within a given society. Disabilities may be cognitive, developmental, intellectual, mental, physical, sensory, or a combination of multiple factors. Disabilities can be present from birth or can be acquired during a person's lifetime. Historically, disabilities have only been recognized based on a narrow set of criteria—however, disabilities are not binary and can be present in unique characteristics depending on the individual. A disability may be readily visible, or invisible in nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deaf culture</span> Culture of deaf persons

Deaf culture is the set of social beliefs, behaviors, art, literary traditions, history, values, and shared institutions of communities that are influenced by deafness and which use sign languages as the main means of communication. When used as a cultural label, especially within the culture, the word deaf is often written with a capital D and referred to as "big D Deaf" in speech and sign. When used as a label for the audiological condition, it is written with a lower case d. Carl G. Croneberg coined the term "Deaf Culture" and he was the first to discuss analogies between Deaf and hearing cultures in his appendices C/D of the 1965 Dictionary of American Sign Language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethnic enclave</span> Geographical spot with high concentration of certain ethnic groups

In sociology, an ethnic enclave is a geographic area with high ethnic concentration, characteristic cultural identity, and economic activity. The term is usually used to refer to either a residential area or a workspace with a high concentration of ethnic firms. Their success and growth depends on self-sufficiency, and is coupled with economic prosperity.

Audism as described by deaf activists is a form of discrimination directed against deaf people, which may include those diagnosed as deaf from birth, or otherwise. Tom L. Humphries coined the term in his doctoral dissertation in 1975, but it did not start to catch on until Harlan Lane used it in his writing. Humphries originally applied audism to individual attitudes and practices; whereas Lane broadened the term to include oppression of deaf people.

Korean Sign Language or KSL is a sign language used for deaf communities of South Korea. It is one of two official languages in the country, alongside Korean.

In the United States, deaf culture was born in Connecticut in 1817 at the American School for the Deaf, when a deaf teacher from France, Laurent Clerc, was recruited by Thomas Gallaudet to help found the new institution. Under the guidance and instruction of Clerc in language and ways of living, deaf American students began to evolve their own strategies for communication and for living, which became the kernel for the development of American Deaf culture.

Singapore Sign Language, or SgSL, is the native sign language used by the deaf and hard of hearing in Singapore, developed over six decades since the setting up of the first school for the Deaf in 1954. Since Singapore's independence in 1965, the Singapore deaf community has had to adapt to many linguistic changes. Today, the local deaf community recognises Singapore Sign Language (SgSL) as a reflection of Singapore's diverse culture. SgSL is influenced by Shanghainese Sign Language (SSL), American Sign Language (ASL), Signing Exact English (SEE-II) and locally developed signs.

Linguistic discrimination is unfair treatment of people which is based on their use of language and the characteristics of their speech, including their first language, their accent, the perceived size of their vocabulary, their modality, and their syntax. For example, an Occitan speaker in France will probably be treated differently from a French speaker. Based on a difference in use of language, a person may automatically form judgments about another person's wealth, education, social status, character or other traits, which may lead to discrimination.

American Sign Language literature is one of the most important shared cultural experiences in the American deaf community. Literary genres initially developed in residential Deaf institutes, such as American School for the Deaf in Hartford, Connecticut, which is where American Sign Language developed as a language in the early 19th century. There are many genres of ASL literature, such as narratives of personal experience, poetry, cinematographic stories, folktales, translated works, original fiction and stories with handshape constraints. Authors of ASL literature use their body as the text of their work, which is visually read and comprehended by their audience viewers. In the early development of ASL literary genres, the works were generally not analyzed as written texts are, but the increased dissemination of ASL literature on video has led to greater analysis of these genres.

A village sign language, or village sign, also known as a shared sign language, is a local indigenous sign language used by both deaf and hearing in an area with a high incidence of congenital deafness. Meir et al. define a village sign language as one which "arise[s] in an existing, relatively insular community into which a number of deaf children are born." The term "rural sign language" refers to almost the same concept. In many cases, the sign language is known throughout the community by a large portion of the hearing population. These languages generally include signs derived from gestures used by the hearing population, so that neighboring village sign languages may be lexically similar without being actually related, due to local similarities in cultural gestures which preceded the sign languages. Most village sign languages are endangered due to the spread of formal education for the deaf, which use or generate deaf-community sign languages, such as a national or foreign sign language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deaf rights movement</span>

The Deaf rights movement encompasses a series of social movements within the disability rights and cultural diversity movements that encourages deaf and hard of hearing to push society to adopt a position of equal respect for them. Acknowledging that those who were Deaf or hard of hearing had rights to obtain the same things as those hearing lead this movement. Establishing an educational system to teach those with Deafness was one of the first accomplishments of this movement. Sign language, as well as cochlear implants, has also had an extensive impact on the Deaf community. These have all been aspects that have paved the way for those with Deafness, which began with the Deaf Rights movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nalaga'at</span> Israeli nonprofit organization

Na Laga'at is a nonprofit organization founded in 2002 by Adina Tal and Eran Gur around the first of its kind in the world ensemble whose actors are all deafblind. The organization established a unique cultural center at the Levantbondet House in the Port of Jaffa in Tel Aviv. The center is a platform for creative arts, which promote equal and open dialogue and lead to social change built on the belief in the human spirit and its ability to reach out and make a change.

Deaf mental health care is the providing of counseling, therapy, and other psychiatric services to people who are deaf and hard of hearing in ways that are culturally aware and linguistically accessible. This term also covers research, training, and services in ways that improve mental health for deaf people. These services consider those with a variety of hearing levels and experiences with deafness focusing on their psychological well-being. The National Association of the Deaf has identified that specialized services and knowledge of the Deaf increases successful mental health services to this population. States such as North Carolina, South Carolina, and Alabama have specialized Deaf mental health services. The Alabama Department of Mental Health has established an office of Deaf services to serve the more than 39,000 deaf and hard of hearing person who will require mental health services.

#DeafTalent is a hashtag used to highlight through social media the capabilities of the deaf and hard of hearing community. Prior to the hashtag's emergence, in the creative industry, hearing actors had been cast in deaf roles. The SAGE Deaf Studies Encyclopedia wrote, "In response to this, the social media hashtags #DeafTalent and #POCDeafTalent were created. The hashtags, while originally used to point out problematic portrayals of deaf characters and sign language in the media, are now also used to celebrate the wide breadth and multiplicity of deaf actors, artists, and other talent in the world."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iosif Florianovich Geilman</span> Soviet sign language expert

Iosif Florianovich Geilman was a Soviet and international expert on sign language, a sign language interpreter and the author of multiple publications used to this day. Also, he was the founder and first director of the first All-Russian Educational Center for the Deaf known as LRC , where hearing-impaired from all across the USSR came to receive higher education or trade skills. Iosif Geilman was one of the key experts on the committee entrusted to develop Gestuno, an international sign language.

Deafness in Uzbekistan has cultural and medical implications. In 2019, the Society of the Deaf of Uzbekistan recorded that approximately 21,212 people, adults and children, are deaf or hard-of-hearing. The primary sign language of Uzbekistan is Russian Sign Language (RSL).

The Canadian Association of the Deaf estimates that there are over 350,000 Deaf Canadians, but there is not an exact number since there has never been a formal census on Deaf Canadians. There are approximately 1.2 million Indigenous people and over 750 reserves in Canada. There are various intersections of deaf and Indigenous culture, including valuing community, rooting their identity in their culture and its associated group instead of their individuality, having their identities oversimplified, being underrepresented in research and data collection, and experiencing health inequities due to their identities. There is limited research on Deaf Indigenous people, but the Saskatchewan Human Rights Association argues that issues faced by Deaf people are exacerbated when that person is also Indigenous.

There is limited information on the extent of Deafness in Haiti, due mainly to the lack of census data. Haiti's poor infrastructure makes it almost impossible to obtain accurate information on many health related issues, not just the hearing impaired. In 2003, the number of deaf people in Haiti was estimated at 72,000, based on a survey provided by the World Health Organization.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "The Status of the Deaf in Russia Before and After the October Revolution, 1917". American Annals of the Deaf. 76 (5): 452–461. 1931. ISSN   0002-726X. JSTOR   44391097.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Shaw, Claire (2015). ""We Have No Need to Lock Ourselves Away": Space, Marginality, and the Negotiation of Deaf Identity in Late Soviet Moscow". Slavic Review. 74 (1): 57–78. doi:10.5612/slavicreview.74.1.57. ISSN   0037-6779. JSTOR   10.5612/slavicreview.74.1.57. S2CID   161132242.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Burch, S. (2000-12-01). "Transcending Revolutions: The Tsars, the Soviets and Deaf Culture". Journal of Social History. 34 (2): 393–401. doi:10.1353/jsh.2000.0130. ISSN   0022-4529. PMID   18360961. S2CID   35983479.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Claire Shaw (2013). "'Speaking in the Language of Art': Soviet Deaf Theatre and the Politics of Identity during Khrushchev's Thaw". The Slavonic and East European Review. 91 (4): 759–786. doi:10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.91.4.0759. JSTOR   10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.91.4.0759. S2CID   142526994.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "О ВОГ". Всероcсийское Общество Глухих (in Russian). Retrieved 2021-09-29.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.