Forest transition

Last updated
Forest-Transition-Model-01.png
Forest-transition-phase.svg

Forest transition refers to a geographic theory describing a reversal or turnaround in land-use trends for a given territory from a period of net forest area loss (i.e., deforestation) to a period of net forest area gain. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] The term "landscape turnaround" has also been used to represent a more general recovery of natural areas that is independent of biome type. [2] [8]

Contents

Changes in forest area (like deforestation) may follow a pattern suggested by the forest transition (FT) theory, [9] whereby at early stages in its development a country is characterized by high forest cover and low deforestation rates (HFLD countries). [10]

Then deforestation rates accelerate (HFHD, high forest cover – high deforestation rate), and forest cover is reduced (LFHD, low forest cover – high deforestation rate), before the deforestation rate slows (LFLD, low forest cover – low deforestation rate), after which forest cover stabilizes and eventually starts recovering. FT is not a "law of nature", and the pattern is influenced by national context (for example, human population density, stage of development, structure of the economy), global economic forces, and government policies. A country may reach very low levels of forest cover before it stabilizes, or it might through good policies be able to "bridge" the forest transition.[ citation needed ]

Theory

FT depicts a broad trend, and an extrapolation of historical rates therefore tends to underestimate future BAU deforestation for countries in the early stages of the transition (HFLD), while it tends to overestimate BAU deforestation for countries in the later stages (LFHD and LFLD).

Countries with high forest cover can be expected to be at early stages of the FT. GDP per capita captures the stage in a country's economic development, which is linked to the pattern of natural resource use, including forests. The choice of forest cover and GDP per capita also fits well with the two key scenarios in the FT:

(i) a forest scarcity path, where forest scarcity triggers forces (for example, higher prices of forest products) that lead to forest cover stabilization; and

(ii) an economic development path, where new and better off-farm employment opportunities associated with economic growth (= increasing GDP per capita) reduce the profitability of frontier agriculture and slows deforestation. [10]

Causes

Forest recovery resulting in net increases in forest extent can occur by means of spontaneous regeneration, active planting, or both. [11] [12]

There are two main paths in reforestation, one emerging from economic development and another from forest scarcity. [12] There are many causes of transition, foremost, economic development leads to industrialisation and urbanisation, pulling the labour force away from the countryside to cities. For example, in Puerto Rico, industrial policies which subsidised manufacturing led to a transition towards urban sector manufacturing and service jobs, leading to land abandonment and forest regrowth. [13] Furthermore, changes in agricultural technology make the most productive areas more agriculturally productive, concentrating agricultural production into those areas. [12] Redistribution of labour resources from areas of low fertility to areas of greater fertility promotes regrowth in the areas experiencing depopulation. [12]

Demand for forest products, especially wood, resulting from earlier deforestation, also creates market incentives to plant trees and more effectively manage forest resources. [12] Due to forestry intensification, higher forest productivity saves remaining forests from exploitation pressures. [13] Moreover, cultural responses to losses in forest area lead to government intervention to implement policies promoting reforestation. [13]

A Kuznets curve analysis of the problem, where income leads to forest regrowth, has contradictory results, due to the complex interaction of income with many socioeconomic variables (e.g. democratisation, globalisation, etc.) [13] The factors which drive deforestation also control the forest transition, promoting urbanisation, development, changing relative agricultural and urban prices, population density, demand for forest products, land tenure systems, and trade. Transitions involve a combination of socioeconomic feedbacks from forest decline and development. [14]

Global forest transition

Studies of forest transitions have been conducted for several nations as well as sub-national regions. [15] Territories reported to have experienced forest transitions after the onset of industrialization include Bangladesh, China, Costa Rica, Cuba, Denmark, [16] Canada, [2] Dominican Republic, [17] El Salvador, [18] France, [2] [19] Greece, [2] Gambia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Morocco, Norway, New Zealand, Portugal, Puerto Rico, [2] [17] [20] [21] Rwanda, Scotland, [22] South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, [2] [23] the United States, [2] the United Kingdom, [2] and Vietnam. [24] [25] Furthermore, forest-transition dynamics have been documented for regions within Brazil, [8] [26] [27] Ecuador, [28] and Mexico. [29] [30]

The environmental effects of these forest transitions are very variable, depending on whether deforestation of old-growth forests continue, the proportions and types of tree plantations versus natural regeneration of forests, and the location and spatial configuration of the different types of forests. [15] In southern Brazil, reforestation mainly occurred through tree plantations, replanting trees, increasing forest cover. [15] And in Honduras, a transition to coffee growing led to abandonment of low-lying regions as coffee farmers moved to high-sloped highland regions. [15]

The findings of returning forests in these widespread studies raise questions about the prospects of a worldwide forest transition, particularly given ongoing processes of forest loss in many parts of the world. [2] [11] [31] Optimistic predictions would have a return of some 70 million hectares of forest by 2050. [32] Yet, there are significant concerns which would dampen this enthusiasm, with local governance issues and the more structural looming shortage of productive land as human populations continue to increase. [33] So far as significant increases in agricultural productivity are possible in developing countries, current under-utilised land reserves may not require exploitation. [33]

A study on forest transition theory reported that over 60 years (1960–2019), "the global forest area has declined by 81.7 million ha", and concluded higher income nations need to reduce imports of tropical forest-related products and help with theoretically forest-related socioeconomic development and international policies. [34] [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation</span> Conversion of forest to non-forest for human use

Deforestation or forest clearance is the removal of a forest or stand of trees from land that is then converted to non-forest use. Deforestation can involve conversion of forest land to farms, ranches, or urban use. The most concentrated deforestation occurs in tropical rainforests. About 31% of Earth's land surface is covered by forests at present. This is one-third less than the forest cover before the expansion of agriculture, with half of that loss occurring in the last century. Between 15 million to 18 million hectares of forest, an area the size of Bangladesh, are destroyed every year. On average 2,400 trees are cut down each minute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reforestation</span> Land regeneration method (replacement of trees)

Reforestation is the natural or intentional restocking of existing forests and woodlands (forestation) that have been depleted, usually through deforestation but also after clearcutting. Two important purposes of reforestation programs are for harvesting of wood or for climate change mitigation purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resource depletion</span> Depletion of natural organic and inorganic resources

Resource depletion is the consumption of a resource faster than it can be replenished. Natural resources are commonly divided between renewable resources and non-renewable resources. Use of either of these forms of resources beyond their rate of replacement is considered to be resource depletion. The value of a resource is a direct result of its availability in nature and the cost of extracting the resource, the more a resource is depleted the more the value of the resource increases. There are several types of resource depletion, the most known being: Aquifer depletion, deforestation, mining for fossil fuels and minerals, pollution or contamination of resources, slash-and-burn agricultural practices, soil erosion, and overconsumption, excessive or unnecessary use of resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Socioeconomics</span> Social science that studies how economic activity affects and is shaped by social processes

Socioeconomics is the social science that studies how economic activity affects and is shaped by social processes. In general it analyzes how modern societies progress, stagnate, or regress because of their local or regional economy, or the global economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forestation</span>

Forestation is a vital ecological process where forests are established and grown through afforestation and reforestation efforts. Afforestation involves planting trees on previously non-forested lands, while reforestation focuses on replanting trees in areas that were once deforested. This process plays an important role in restoring degraded forests, enhancing ecosystems, promoting carbon sequestration, and biodiversity conservation.

An environmental factor, ecological factor or eco factor is any factor, abiotic or biotic, that influences living organisms. Abiotic factors include ambient temperature, amount of sunlight, air, soil, water and pH of the water soil in which an organism lives. Biotic factors would include the availability of food organisms and the presence of biological specificity, competitors, predators, and parasites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land development</span> Landscape alteration

Land development is the alteration of landscape in any number of ways such as:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitat destruction</span> Process by which a natural habitat becomes incapable of supporting its native species

Habitat destruction is the process by which a natural habitat becomes incapable of supporting its native species. The organisms that previously inhabited the site are displaced or dead, thereby reducing biodiversity and species abundance. Habitat destruction is the leading cause of biodiversity loss. Fragmentation and loss of habitat have become one of the most important topics of research in ecology as they are major threats to the survival of endangered species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation in Thailand</span> Overview of the history and state of Thailands forests

Deforestation in Thailand refers to the conversion of its forested land to other uses. Deforestation numbers are inexact due to the scope of the issue. According to the Royal Forest Department (RFD) in 2019, Thai forests cover 31.6% of Thailand's landmass. The department claims that forest coverage grew by 330,000 rai in 2018, an area equivalent in size to the island of Phuket. A year earlier, an academic claimed that, since 2016, forested area has declined by 18,000 rai, a significant improvement over the period 2008–2013, when a forested million rai were lost each year. In 1975, the government set a goal of 40% forest coverage—25% natural forest and 15% commercial forest—within 20 years. To achieve that target in 2018, 27 million rai would have to be afforested.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation in Nigeria</span>

Deforestation in Nigeria refers to the extensive and rapid clearing of forests within the borders of Nigeria. This environmental issue has significant impacts on both local and global scales.

According to a 2005 report conducted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Vietnam has the second highest rate of deforestation of primary forests in the world, second only to Nigeria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental issues in Malaysia</span>

Malaysia faces several environmental issues. Malaysia's environment possesses megadiverse biological diversity, with globally significant endemism and biodiversity, but is threatened by several issues. Deforestation is a major issue in the country that has led to many species becoming threatened with extinction. As a major economic sector, palm oil production has had a substantial environmental impact. Air pollution is also a major issue, with the country one of the most affected countries by seasonal Southeast Asian haze. The country is also affected by climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation by continent</span> Removal of forests worldwide

Rates and causes of deforestation vary from region to region around the world. In 2009, two-thirds of the world's forests were located in just 10 countries: Russia, Brazil, Canada, the United States, China, Australia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Indonesia, India, and Peru.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation in Madagascar</span>

Deforestation in Madagascar is an ongoing environmental issue. Deforestation creates agricultural or pastoral land but can also result in desertification, water resource degradation, biodiversity erosion and habitat loss, and soil loss.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation in Central America</span> Loss of forest biome in the Americas

Central American countries have experienced cycles of deforestation and reforestation since the decline of Maya civilization, influenced by many factors such as population growth, agriculture, narcotic distribution and illegal practices. From 2001 to 2010, 5,376 square kilometres (2,076 sq mi) of forest were lost in the region. In 2010 Belize had 63% of remaining forest cover, Costa Rica 46%, Panama 45%, Honduras 41%, Guatemala 37%, Nicaragua 29%, and El Salvador 21%. Most of the loss occurred in the moist forest biome, with 12,201 square kilometers. Woody vegetation loss was partially set off by a plus in the coniferous forest biome with 4,730 km2, and at 2,054 km2. Mangroves and deserts contributed only 1% to the loss in forest vegetation. The bulk of the deforestation was located at the Caribbean slopes of Nicaragua with a minus of 8,574 square kilometers of forest lost in the period from 2001 to 2010. The most significant regrowth of 3,050 km2 of forest was seen in the coniferous woody vegetation of Honduras.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forest restoration</span>

Forest restoration is defined as “actions to re-instate ecological processes, which accelerate recovery of forest structure, ecological functioning and biodiversity levels towards those typical of climax forest” i.e. the end-stage of natural forest succession. Climax forests are relatively stable ecosystems that have developed the maximum biomass, structural complexity and species diversity that are possible within the limits imposed by climate and soil and without continued disturbance from humans. Climax forest is therefore the target ecosystem, which defines the ultimate aim of forest restoration. Since climate is a major factor that determines climax forest composition, global climate change may result in changing restoration aims. Additionally, the potential impacts of climate change on restoration goals must be taken into account, as changes in temperature and precipitation patterns may alter the composition and distribution of climax forests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation in Myanmar</span>

According to a report by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Myanmar lost 19%, or 7,445,000 hectares, of forest between 1990 and 2010. With forest covering as much as 70% of Burma at the time of independence, there were only slightly more than 48% forest cover left as of 2014. The deforestation rate of Myanmar has declined from 0.95% per year in the years 1990–2010 to about 0.3% per year and deforestation in Myanmar is now less than other countries of the region such as Indonesia or Vietnam, but still remains an important environmental issue. Three main factors contribute to continued deforestation: unsustainable and illegal logging, unresolved land rights and land disputes and extensive agricultural development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deforestation and climate change</span> Relationship between deforestation and global warming

Deforestation is a primary contributor to climate change, and climate change affects forests. Land use changes, especially in the form of deforestation, are the second largest anthropogenic source of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions, after fossil fuel combustion. Greenhouse gases are emitted during combustion of forest biomass and decomposition of remaining plant material and soil carbon. Global models and national greenhouse gas inventories give similar results for deforestation emissions. As of 2019, deforestation is responsible for about 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation are accelerating. Growing forests are a carbon sink with additional potential to mitigate the effects of climate change. Some of the effects of climate change, such as more wildfires, insect outbreaks, invasive species, and storms are factors that increase deforestation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land change science</span> Interdisciplinary study of changes in climate, land use, and land cover

Land change science refers to the interdisciplinary study of changes in climate, land use, and land cover. Land change science specifically seeks to evaluate patterns, processes, and consequences in changes in land use and cover over time. The purpose of land change science is to contribute to existing knowledge of climate change and to the development of sustainable resource management and land use policy. The field is informed by a number of related disciplines, such as remote sensing, landscape ecology, and political ecology, and uses a broad range of methods to evaluate the patterns and processes that underlie land cover change. Land change science addresses land use as a coupled human-environment system to understand the impacts of interconnected environmental and social issues, including deforestation and urbanization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telecoupling</span>

Telecoupling is a strategy that comprehensively analyzes both the socioeconomic and environmental impacts over long distances. The concept of telecoupling is a logical extension of research on coupled human and natural systems, in which interactions occur within particular geographic locations. The telecoupling framework derives from the understanding that all land systems are connected through coupled human and natural systems, and these that social, ecological, and economic impacts are the result. The term telecoupling was first coined by Jianguo Liu as an evolution of the term teleconnection. While teleconnection makes reference to atmospheric sciences only, telecoupling references the integration of multiple scientific disciplines including social science, environmental science, natural science, and systems science. The integration of these dynamic fields of science is what allows the telecoupling framework to comprehensively analyze distal connections that have been previously understudied and unacknowledged.

References

  1. ↑ Mather, Alexander S. (1992). "The forest transition". Area . 24 (4): 367–379.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Walker, R. (1993). "Deforestation and Economic Development". Canadian Journal of Regional Science. 16 (3): 481–497.
  3. ↑ Grainger, Alan (1995). "The forest transition: an alternative approach". Area . 27 (3): 242–251.
  4. ↑ Mather, Alexander S.; Needle, C.L. (1998). "The forest transition: a theoretical basis". Area . 30 (2): 117–124. Bibcode:1998Area...30..117M. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00055.x.
  5. ↑ Rudel, Thomas K. (1998). "Is there a forest transition? Deforestation, reforestation, and development". Rural Sociology . 63 (4): 533–552. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00691.x.
  6. ↑ Perz, Stephen G. (2007). "Grand theory and context-specificity in the study of forest dynamics: forest transition theory and other directions". Professional Geographer . 59 (1): 105–114. Bibcode:2007ProfG..59..105P. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00594.x. S2CID   140182729.
  7. ↑ Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011, p. 344.
  8. 1 2 Walker, R. (2011). "The scale of forest transition: Amazonia and the Atlantic forests of Brazil". Applied Geography . 32 (1): 12–20.
  9. ↑ Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011.
  10. 1 2 Rudel, T.K. (2005) Tropical Forests: Regional Paths of Destruction and Regeneration in the Late 20th Century. Columbia University Press ISBN   0-231-13195-X
  11. 1 2 Rudel, Thomas K.; Coomes, Oliver T.; Moran, Emilio; Achard, Frederic; Angelsen, Arild; Xu, Jianchu; Lambin, Eric (2005). "Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of the land use change". Global Environmental Change . 15: 23–31. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011, p. 348.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011, p. 349.
  14. ↑ Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011, p. 353.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011, p. 350.
  16. ↑ Mather, Alexander S.; Needle, C.L.; Coull, J.R. (1998). "From resource crisis to sustainability: the forest transition in Denmark". International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 5 (3): 182–193. Bibcode:1998IJSDW...5..182M. doi:10.1080/13504509809469982.
  17. 1 2 Aide, T. Mitchell; Grau, H. Ricardo (2004). "Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems". Science . 305 (5692): 1915–1916. doi:10.1126/science.1103179. hdl: 11336/101459 . PMID   15448256. S2CID   131549198.
  18. ↑ Hecht, Susanna B.; Kandel, Susan; Gomes, Ileana; Cuellar, Nelson; Rosa, Herman (2006). "Globalization, forest resurgence, and environmental politics in El Salvador" (PDF). World Development . 34 (2): 308–323. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.09.005.
  19. ↑ Mather, Alexander S.; Fairbairn, J.; Needle, C.L. (1999). "The course and drivers of the forest transition: the case of France". Journal of Rural Studies . 15 (1): 65–90. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00023-0.
  20. ↑ Rudel, Thomas K.; Perez-Lugo, Marla; Zichal, Heather (2000). "When fields revert to forest: development and spontaneous reforestation in post-war Puerto Rico". Professional Geographer . 52 (3): 386–397. Bibcode:2000ProfG..52..386R. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00233. S2CID   128468075.
  21. ↑ Grau, H. Ricardo; Aide, T. Mitchell; Zimmerman, Jess K.; Thomlinson, John R.; Helmer, Eileen; Zou, Xioming (2003). "The ecological consequences of socioeconomic and land-use changes in postagricultural Puerto Rico". BioScience . 53 (12): 1159–1168. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1159:TECOSA]2.0.CO;2 . S2CID   43455468.
  22. ↑ Mather, Alexander S. (2004). "Forest transition theory and the reforesting of Scotland". Scottish Geographical Journal. 120 (1–2): 83–98. Bibcode:2004ScGJ..120...83M. doi:10.1080/00369220418737194. S2CID   129628209.
  23. ↑ Mather, Alexander S.; Fairbairn, J. (2000). "From floods to reforestation: the forest transition in Switzerland". Environment and History. 6 (4): 399–421. doi:10.3197/096734000129342352.
  24. ↑ Meyfroidt, Patrick; Lambin, Eric F. (2008). "Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts". Global Change Biology . 14 (6): 1319–1336. Bibcode:2008GCBio..14.1319M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01575.x. S2CID   86436706.
  25. ↑ Meyfroidt, Patrick; Lambin, Eric F. (2007). "The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam". Land Use Policy. 25 (2): 182–197.
  26. ↑ Perz, Stephen G.; Skole, David L. (2003). "Secondary forest expansion in the Brazilian Amazon and the refinement of forest transition theory". Society and Natural Resources. 16 (4): 277–294. Bibcode:2003SNatR..16..277P. doi:10.1080/08941920390178856. S2CID   154476196.
  27. ↑ Baptista, Sandra R.; Rudel, Thomas K. (2006). "A re-emerging Atlantic forest? Urbanization, industrialization and the forest transition in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil". Environmental Conservation. 33 (3): 195–202. Bibcode:2006EnvCo..33..195B. doi:10.1017/S0376892906003134. S2CID   86716728.
  28. ↑ Rudel, Thomas K.; Bates, Diane; Machinguiashi, Rafael (2002). "A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 92 (1): 87–102. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00281. S2CID   53055910.
  29. ↑ Klooster, Dan (2003). "Forest transitions in Mexico: institutions and forests in a globalized countryside". Professional Geographer . 55 (2): 227–237. Bibcode:2003ProfG..55..227K. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.5502010. S2CID   59370821.
  30. ↑ Bray, David B.; Klepeis, Peter (2005). "Deforestation, forest transitions, and institutions for sustainability in southeastern Mexico, 1900-2000". Environment and History. 11 (2): 195–223. doi:10.3197/096734005774434584.
  31. ↑ Kauppi, Pekka E.; Ausubel, Jesse H.; Fang, Jingyun; Mather, Alexander S.; Sedjo, Roger A.; Waggoner, Paul E. (2006). "Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (46): 17574–17579. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10317574K. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608343103 . PMC   1635979 . PMID   17101996.
  32. ↑ Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011, p. 356.
  33. 1 2 Meyfroidt & Lambin 2011, p. 357.
  34. ↑ "200 million acres of forest cover have been lost since 1960". Grist. 5 August 2022. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
  35. ↑ Estoque, Ronald C; Dasgupta, Rajarshi; Winkler, Karina; Avitabile, Valerio; Johnson, Brian A; Myint, Soe W; Gao, Yan; Ooba, Makoto; Murayama, Yuji; Lasco, Rodel D (1 August 2022). "Spatiotemporal pattern of global forest change over the past 60 years and the forest transition theory". Environmental Research Letters. 17 (8): 084022. Bibcode:2022ERL....17h4022E. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7df5 . ISSN   1748-9326.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.