History of black hole physics

Last updated

Black holes have primarily been subjects of research since the advent of general relativity in the early 1900s, although similar concepts were discussed before then. Several months after Albert Einstein first described general relativity in 1917, astrophysicist Karl Schwarzschild applied the model to stars and discovered a solution to the Einstein field equations containing singularities, which would later become known as the Schwarzschild solution. This solution was the foundation for Schwarzschild black holes: black holes with no spin or charge.

Contents

Initially, black holes were dismissed by early researchers as purely theoretical curiosities or even physically impossible. The emerging concept of degeneracy pressure led many physicists to believe that a yet-to-be-known mechanism would stop a star from collapsing into a black hole, no matter its mass. However, in 1939, J. Robert Oppenheimer and Hartland Snyder analyzed stellar collapse and determined that there seemed to be no mechanism that could prevent all stars from becoming black holes.

After Oppenheimer's and Snyder's discovery, black holes began to become more widely accepted among physicists, who began to further investigate and understand the Schwarzschild solution. Three more metrics were created to describe other kinds of black holes: the Reissner-Nordstrom metric, describing charged, nonspinning black holes, the Kerr metric, describing spinning, uncharged black holes, and the Kerr-Newman metric, describing spinning and charged black holes. Werner Israel later discovered that any black hole must be described by one of these parameters and can only have three properties: charge, mass, and spin.

Meanwhile, actual astronomical observations of black holes were beginning. The first widely recognized black hole, Cygnus X-1, was discovered in 1972 and accepted by most of the scientific community as a black hole by the end of 1973. Although Cygnus X-1 was a stellar black hole, evidence built for the existence of supermassive black holes as well, and the Hubble Space Telescope revealed that supermassive black holes were nearly ubiquitous in galactic centers. In more recent years, advances in interferometry have allowed scientists to take the first photo of a black hole and detect black hole mergers via gravitational waves.

Before general relativity

The idea of a body so massive that even light could not escape was briefly proposed by English astronomical pioneer and clergyman John Michell and independently by French scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace. Both scholars proposed very large stars in contrast to the modern concept of an extremely dense object. [1]

Michell's idea, in a short part of a letter published in 1784, [2] calculated that a star with the same density but 500 times the radius of the sun would not let any emitted light escape; the surface escape velocity would exceed the speed of light. [3] :122 Michell correctly noted that such supermassive but non-radiating bodies might be detectable through their gravitational effects on nearby visible bodies. [1]

In 1796, Laplace mentioned that a star could be invisible if it were sufficiently large while speculating on the origin of the Solar System in his book Exposition du Système du Monde. Franz Xaver von Zach asked Laplace for a mathematical analysis, which Laplace provided and published in a journal edited by von Zach. [1] Laplace omitted his comment about invisible stars in later editions of his book, perhaps because Thomas Young's wave theory of light had cast doubt on the validity of the corpuscles of light used in Laplace's mathematical analysis. [3] :123

General relativity

In 1905, Albert Einstein showed that the laws of electromagnetism would be invariant under a Lorentz transformation: they would be identical for observers travelling at different velocities relative to each other. This discovery became known as the principle of special relativity. Although the laws of mechanics had already been shown to be invariant, gravity remained yet to be included. [4] :19 To add gravity to his theory of relativity, Einstein was guided by observations by Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton and others which showed inertial mass equalled gravitational mass. [4] :11 In 1907, Einstein published a paper proposing his equivalence principle, the hypothesis that this equality means the two forms of mass have a common cause. Using the principle, Einstein predicted the redshift effect of gravity on light. [4] :19

In 1911, Einstein predicted [5] the deflection of light by massive bodies, but his analysis was premature and off by a factor of two. [4] :19

By 1917, Einstein refined these ideas into his general theory of relativity, which explained how matter affects spacetime, which in turn affects the motion of other matter. [6] [7] [8] This theory formed the basis for black hole physics. [9]

Singular solutions in general relativity

Only a few months after Einstein published the field equations describing general relativity, astrophysicist Karl Schwarzschild set out to apply the idea to stars. He assumed spherical symmetry with no spin and found a solution to Einstein's equations. [3] :124 [10] A few months after Schwarzschild, Johannes Droste, a student of Hendrik Lorentz, independently gave the same solution for the point mass using a different set of coordinates. [11] [12] At a certain radius from the center of the mass, the Schwarzschild solution became singular, meaning that some of the terms in the Einstein equations became infinite. The nature of this radius, which later became known as the Schwarzschild radius, was not understood at the time. [13]

Many physicists of the early 20th century were skeptical of the existence of black holes. In a 1926 popular science book, Arthur Eddington discussed the idea of a star with mass compressed to its Schwarzschild radius, but his analysis was meant to illustrate issues in the then-poorly-understood theory of general relativity rather than to seriously analyze the problem: Eddington did not believe black holes existed. [14] [3] :134 In 1939, Einstein himself used his theory of general relativity in an attempt to prove that black holes were impossible. [15] [16] His work relied on increasing pressure or increasing centrifugal force balancing the force of gravity so that the object would not collapse beyond its Schwarzschild radius. He missed the possibility that implosion would drive the system below this critical value. [3] :135

Gravity vs degeneracy pressure

By the 1920s, astronomers had classified a number of white dwarf stars as too cool and dense to be explained by the gradual cooling of ordinary stars. In 1926, Ralph Fowler showed that quantum-mechanical degeneracy pressure was larger than thermal pressure at these densities. [3] :145 In 1931, using a combination of special relativity and quantum mechanics, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar calculated that a non-rotating body of electron-degenerate matter below a certain limiting mass (now called the Chandrasekhar limit at 1.4 M) is stable, and by 1934 he showed that this explained the catalog of white dwarf stars. [3] :151 At the same meeting where Chandrasekhar announced his results, Eddington pointed out that stars above this limit would radiate until they were sufficiently dense to prevent light from exiting, a conclusion he considered absurd. Eddington and, later, Lev Landau argued that some yet unknown mechanism would stop the collapse. [17] They were partially correct: a white dwarf slightly more massive than the Chandrasekhar limit will collapse into a neutron star, which is itself stable. [18] These arguments from senior scientists delayed acceptance of Chandrasekhar's model. [3] :159

In the 1930s, Fritz Zwicky and Walter Baade studied stellar novae, focusing on exceptionally bright ones they called supernovae. Zwicky promoted the idea that supernovae produced stars with the density of atomic nuclei—neutron stars—but this idea was largely ignored. [3] :171 In 1937, Lev Landau published a detailed model of a nuclear core model for stellar cores, which caught the attention of Robert Oppenheimer. In 1939, based on Chandrasekhar's reasoning, Oppenheimer and George Volkoff predicted that neutron stars below a certain mass limit—now known as the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit—would be stable due to neutron degeneracy pressure. Above that limit, they reasoned that either their model would not apply or that gravitational contraction would not stop. [19] :380

John Archibald Wheeler and two of his students resolved questions about the model behind the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff (TOV) limit. Harrison and Wheeler developed the equations of state relating density to pressure for cold matter all the way from atoms through electron degeneracy to neutron degeneracy. Masami Wakano and Wheeler then used the equations to compute the equilibrium curve for stars, relating mass to circumference. They found no additional features that would invalidate the TOV limit. This meant that the only thing that could prevent black holes from forming was a dynamic process ejecting sufficient mass from a star as it cooled. [3] :205 Wheeler held the view that the neutrons in an imploding star would convert to electromagnetic radiation fast enough that the resulting light would not be trapped in a black hole. [3] :210

Birth of modern model

The modern concept of black holes was formulated by Robert Oppenheimer and his student Hartland Snyder in 1939. [15] [20] :80 In the paper, [21] Oppenheimer and Snyder solved Einstein's equations of general relativity for an idealized imploding star, in a model later called the Oppenheimer–Snyder model, then described the results from far outside the star. The implosion starts as one might expect: the star material rapidly collapses inward. But as density of the star increases, gravitational time dilation increases and the collapse, viewed from afar, seems to slow down. Once the star reached a critical radius—its Schwarzschild radius—faraway viewers would no longer see the implosion. The light from the implosion would be infinitely redshifted and time dilation would be so extreme that it would appear frozen in time. [3] :217

In 1958, David Finkelstein identified the Schwarzschild surface as an event horizon, calling it "a perfect unidirectional membrane: causal influences can cross it in only one direction". In this sense, events that occur inside of the black hole cannot affect events that occur outside of the black hole. [22] Finkelstein created a new reference frame to include the point of view of infalling observers. [20] :103 Finkelstein's solution extended the Schwarzschild solution for the future of observers falling into a black hole. A similar concept had already been found by Martin Kruskal, but its significance had not been fully understood at the time. [20] :103 Finkelstein's new frame of reference allowed events at the event horizon of an imploding star to be related to events far away. By 1962 the two points of view were reconciled, convincing many skeptics that implosion into a black hole made physical sense. [3] :226

Golden age

The first simulated image of a black hole, created by Jean-Pierre Luminet in 1978 and featuring the characteristic shadow, photon sphere, and lensed accretion disk. The disk is brighter on one side due to the Doppler beaming. BH-JPL-A&A1979.jpg
The first simulated image of a black hole, created by Jean-Pierre Luminet in 1978 and featuring the characteristic shadow, photon sphere, and lensed accretion disk. The disk is brighter on one side due to the Doppler beaming.

The era from the mid-1960s to the mid-1970s was the "golden age of black hole research", when general relativity and black holes became mainstream subjects of research. [25] [3] :258

In this period, more general black hole solutions were found. In 1963, Roy Kerr found the exact solution for a rotating black hole. [26] [27] Two years later, Ezra Newman found the cylindrically symmetric solution for a black hole that is both rotating and electrically charged. [28]

In 1967, Werner Israel found that the Schwarzschild solution was the only possible solution for a nonspinning, uncharged black hole, and couldn't have any additional parameters. In that sense, a Schwarzschild black hole would be defined by its mass alone, and any two Schwarzschild black holes with the same mass would be identical. [29] Israel later found that Reissner-Nordstrom black holes were only defined by their mass and electric charge, while Brandon Carter discovered that Kerr black holes only had two degrees of freedom, mass and spin. [30] [31] Together, these findings became known as the no-hair theorem, which states that a stationary black hole is completely described by the three parameters of the Kerr–Newman metric: mass, angular momentum, and electric charge. [32] At first, it was suspected that the strange mathematical singularities found in each of the black hole solutions only appeared due to the assumption that a black hole would be perfectly spherically symmetric, and therefore the singularities would not appear in generic situations where black holes would not necessarily be symmetric. This view was held in particular by Vladimir Belinski, Isaak Khalatnikov, and Evgeny Lifshitz, who tried to prove that no singularities appear in generic solutions, although they would later reverse their positions. [33] However, in 1965, Roger Penrose proved that general relativity without quantum mechanics requires that singularities appear in all black holes. [34] [35] Shortly afterwards, Hawking generalized Penrose's solution to find that in all but a few physically infeasible scenarios, a cosmological Big Bang singularity is inevitable unless quantum gravity intervenes. [36]

Astronomical observations also made great strides during this era. In 1967, Antony Hewish and Jocelyn Bell Burnell discovered pulsars [37] [38] and by 1969, these were shown to be rapidly rotating neutron stars. [39] Until that time, neutron stars, like black holes, were regarded as just theoretical curiosities, but the discovery of pulsars showed their physical relevance and spurred a further interest in all types of compact objects that might be formed by gravitational collapse. [40] Based on observations in Greenwich and Toronto in the early 1970s, Cygnus X-1, a galactic X-ray source discovered in 1964, became the first astronomical object commonly accepted to be a black hole. [41] [42]

Work by James Bardeen, Jacob Bekenstein, Carter, and Hawking in the early 1970s led to the formulation of black hole thermodynamics. [43] These laws describe the behaviour of a black hole in close analogy to the laws of thermodynamics by relating mass to energy, area to entropy, and surface gravity to temperature. The analogy was completed [3] :442 when Hawking, in 1974, showed that quantum field theory implies that black holes should radiate like a black body with a temperature proportional to the surface gravity of the black hole, predicting the effect now known as Hawking radiation. [44]

Modern research and observation

The first strong evidence for black holes came from combined X-ray and optical observations of Cygnus X-1 in 1972. [45] The x-ray source, located in the Cygnus constellation, was discovered through a survey by two suborbital rockets, as the blocking of x-rays by Earth's atmosphere makes it difficult to detect them from the ground. [46] [47] [48] Unlike stars or pulsars, Cygnus X-1 was not associated with any prominent radio or optical source. [48] [49] In 1972, Louise Webster, Paul Murdin, and, independently, Charles Thomas Bolton, found that Cygnus X-1 was actually in a binary system with the supergiant star HDE 226868. Using the emission patterns of the visible star, both research teams found that the mass of Cygnus X-1 was likely too large to be a white dwarf or neutron star, indicating that it was probably a black hole. [50] [51] Further research strengthened their hypothesis. [52] [53]

While Cygnus X-1, a stellar-mass black hole, was generally accepted by the scientific community as a black hole by the end of 1973, [52] it would be decades before a supermassive black hole would gain the same broad recognition. Although, as early as the 1960s, physicists such as Donald Lynden-Bell and Martin Rees had suggested that powerful quasars in the center of galaxies were powered by accreting supermassive black holes, little observational proof existed at the time. [54] [55] However, the Hubble Space Telescope, launched decades later, found that supermassive black holes were not only present in these active galactic nuclei, but that supermassive black holes in the center of galaxies were ubiquitous: Almost every galaxy had a supermassive black hole at its center, many of which were quiescent. [56] [57]

In 1999, David Merritt proposed the M–sigma relation, which related the dispersion of the velocity of matter in the center bulge of a galaxy to the mass of the supermassive black hole at its core. [58] Subsequent studies confirmed this correlation. [59] [60] [61] Around the same time, based on telescope observations of the velocities of stars at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, independent work groups led by Andrea Ghez and Reinhard Genzel concluded that the compact radio source in the center of the galaxy, Sagittarius A*, was likely a supermassive black hole. [62] [63]

The first detection of gravitational waves, imaged by LIGO observatories in Hanford Site, Washington and Livingston, Louisiana LIGO measurement of gravitational waves.svg
The first detection of gravitational waves, imaged by LIGO observatories in Hanford Site, Washington and Livingston, Louisiana

On 11 February 2016, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration announced the first direct detection of gravitational waves, named GW150914, representing the first observation of a black hole merger. [64] At the time of the merger, the black holes were approximately 1.4 billion light-years away from Earth and had masses of 30 and 35 solar masses. [65] :6 The mass of the resulting black hole was approximately 62 solar masses, with an additional three solar masses radiated away as gravitational waves. [65] [66] The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) detected the gravitational waves by using two mirrors spaced four kilometers apart to measure microscopic changes in length. [67] In 2017, Rainer Weiss, Kip Thorne, and Barry Barish, who had spearheaded the project, were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for their work. [68] Since the initial discovery in 2015, hundreds more gravitational waves have been observed by LIGO and another interferometer, Virgo. [69]

Image by the Event Horizon Telescope of the supermassive black hole in the center of Messier 87 Black hole - Messier 87.jpg
Image by the Event Horizon Telescope of the supermassive black hole in the center of Messier 87

On 10 April 2019, the first direct image of a black hole and its vicinity was published, following observations made by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) in 2017 of the supermassive black hole in Messier 87's galactic centre. [70] [71] [72] The observations were carried out by eight observatories in six geographical locations across four days and totaled five petabytes of data. [73] [74] [75] In 2022, the Event Horizon Telescope collaboration released an image of the black hole in the center of the Milky Way galaxy, Sagittarius A*; The data had been collected in 2017. [76] Detailed analysis of the motion of stars recorded by the Gaia mission produced evidence in 2022 [77] and 2023 [78] of a black hole named Gaia BH1 in a binary with a Sun-like star about 1,560 light-years (480 parsecs ) away. Gaia BH1 is currently the closest known black hole to Earth. [79] [80] Two more black holes have since been found from Gaia data, one in a binary with a red giant [81] and the other in a binary with a G-type star. [82]

In 2020, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded for work on black holes. Andrea Ghez and Reinhard Genzel shared one-half for their discovery that Sagittarius A* is a supermassive black hole. [83] Penrose received the other half for his work showing that the mathematics of general relativity requires the formation of black holes. [84] [85] [86] Cosmologists lamented that Hawking's extensive theoretical work on black holes would not be honored since he died in 2018. [87]

Etymology

In December 1967, a student reportedly suggested the phrase black hole at a lecture by John Wheeler; Wheeler adopted the term for its brevity and "advertising value", and Wheeler's stature in the field ensured it quickly caught on, [20] [88] leading some to credit Wheeler with coining the phrase. [89]

However, the term was used by others around that time. Science writer Marcia Bartusiak traces the term black hole to physicist Robert H. Dicke, who in the early 1960s reportedly compared the phenomenon to the Black Hole of Calcutta, notorious as a prison where people entered but never left alive. The term was used in print by Life and Science News magazines in 1963, and by science journalist Ann Ewing in her article "'Black Holes' in Space", dated 18 January 1964, which was a report on a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science held in Cleveland, Ohio. [20]

References

  1. 1 2 3 Montgomery, Colin; Orchiston, Wayne; Whittingham, Ian (2009) [Available online 18 April 2023]. "Michell, Laplace and the origin of the black hole concept" (PDF). Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (Research article). 12 (2): 90–96. Bibcode:2009JAHH...12...90M. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2009.02.01 . S2CID   55890996.
  2. Michell, J. (1784). "On the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &c. of the Fixed Stars, in Consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Their Light, in Case Such a Diminution Should be Found to Take Place in any of Them, and Such Other Data Should be Procured from Observations, as Would be Farther Necessary for That Purpose". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society . 74: 35–57. Bibcode:1784RSPT...74...35M. doi: 10.1098/rstl.1784.0008 . JSTOR   106576.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Thorne, Kip S.; Hawking, Stephen (1994). Agrawal, Milan (ed.). Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy (1st ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN   978-0-393-31276-8 . Retrieved 12 April 2019.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Weinberg, Steven (1972). Gravitation and cosmology . John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-471-92567-5.
  5. Einstein, Albert (1911), "Einfluss der Schwerkraft auf die Ausbreitung des Lichtes (On the Influence of Gravity on the Propagation of Light)", Annalen der Physik , 35 (10): 898–908, Bibcode:1911AnP...340..898E, doi:10.1002/andp.19113401005 (also in Collected Papers Vol. 3, document 23)
  6. Einstein, Albert (1915). "Feldgleichungen der Gravitation" [Field Equations of Gravitation]. Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte: 844–847.
  7. Janssen, Michel; Renn, Jürgen (2015). "Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations". Physics Today (Feature article). 68 (11): 30–36. Bibcode:2015PhT....68k..30J. doi: 10.1063/PT.3.2979 . hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-002A-8ED7-1 .
  8. O'Connor, J J; Robertson, E F (May 1996). "General Relativity". MacTutor. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland. Archived from the original on 12 July 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2025.
  9. Fraknoi, Andrew; Morrison, David; Wolff, Sidney C. (2022). "24.5 Black Holes". Astronomy 2e (PDF) (2e ed.). OpenStax. pp. 839–846. ISBN   978-1-951693-50-3. OCLC   1322188620.
  10. Schwarzschild, K. (1916). "Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie" [On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory]. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 7: 189–196. Bibcode:1916SPAW.......189S via Internet Archive.
  11. Droste, J. (1917). "The field of a single centre in Einstein's theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field" (PDF). Physics. Proceedings of the Section of Sciences. 19 (1). Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen: 197–215. Bibcode:1917KNAB...19..197D. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 16 September 2012.
  12. Kox, A. J. (1992). "General Relativity in the Netherlands: 1915–1920". In Eisenstaedt, Jean; Kox, A. J. (eds.). Studies in the history of general relativity. Birkhäuser. p. 41. ISBN   978-0-8176-3479-7. Archived from the original on 10 August 2016. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
  13. 't Hooft, G. (2009). "Introduction to the Theory of Black Holes" (PDF). Institute for Theoretical Physics / Spinoza Institute. pp. 47–48. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 May 2009. Retrieved 24 June 2010.
  14. Eddington, Arthur (1926). The Internal Constitution of the Stars. Science. Vol. 52. Cambridge University Press. pp. 233–40. Bibcode:1920Sci....52..233E. doi:10.1126/science.52.1341.233. PMID   17747682. Archived from the original on 11 August 2016. ISBN   978-0-521-33708-3
  15. 1 2 Bernstein, Jeremy (2007). "The Reluctant Father of Black Holes" . Scientific American . Vol. 17. pp. 4–11. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0407-4sp . Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  16. Einstein, Albert (10 May 1939). "On a Stationary System With Spherical Symmetry Consisting of Many Gravitating Masses". Annals of Mathematics . 40 (4): 922–936. doi:10.2307/1968902. JSTOR   1968902.
  17. Detweiler, S. (1981). "Resource letter BH-1: Black holes". American Journal of Physics (Paper). 49 (5): 394–400. Bibcode:1981AmJPh..49..394D. doi:10.1119/1.12686.
  18. Harpaz, A. (1994). Stellar evolution. A K Peters. p. 105. ISBN   978-1-56881-012-6. Archived from the original on 11 August 2016.
  19. Oppenheimer, J. R.; Volkoff, G. M. (1939). "On Massive Neutron Cores". Physical Review . 55 (4): 374–381. Bibcode:1939PhRv...55..374O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.374.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 Bartusiak, Marcia (2015). Black Hole: How an Idea Abandoned by Newtonians, Hated by Einstein, and Gambled On by Hawking Became Loved. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-21363-8.
  21. Oppenheimer, J.R.; Snyder, H. (1939). "On Continued Gravitational Contraction". Physical Review (Highlighted article). 56 (5): 455–459. Bibcode:1939PhRv...56..455O. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.56.455 .
  22. Finkelstein, D. (1958). "Past-Future Asymmetry of the Gravitational Field of a Point Particle". Physical Review (Article). 110 (4): 965–967. Bibcode:1958PhRv..110..965F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.110.965.
  23. Luminet, J.-P. (May 1979). "Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 75: 228–235. Bibcode:1979A&A....75..228L. ISSN   0004-6361.
  24. French National Centre for Scientific Research (10 April 2019). "First ever image of a black hole: a CNRS researcher had simulated it as early as 1979". CNRS. Retrieved 18 June 2025.
  25. Thorne K (2003). "5. Warping spacetime". In Shellard ES, Gibbons GW, Rankin SJ (eds.). The future of theoretical physics and cosmology: celebrating Stephen Hawking's 60th birthday. Cambridge University Press. p. 74. ISBN   0-521-82081-2.
  26. Kerr, R. P. (2009). "Discovering the Kerr and Kerr-Schild metrics". In Wiltshire, D. L.; Visser, M.; Scott, S. M. (eds.). The Kerr Spacetime. Cambridge University Press. arXiv: 0706.1109 . Bibcode:2007arXiv0706.1109K. ISBN   978-0-521-88512-6.
  27. Hooper, Dan (27 December 2019). "The Discovery of Black Holes: From Theory to Actuality". Wondrium Daily. Virginia, United States: The Teaching Company. Archived from the original on 25 September 2022. Retrieved 29 June 2022.
  28. Newman ET, et al. (1965). "Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass". Journal of Mathematical Physics (Research article). 6 (6): 918. Bibcode:1965JMP.....6..918N. doi:10.1063/1.1704351.
  29. Israel, W. (1967). "Event Horizons in Static Vacuum Space-Times". Physical Review (Article). 164 (5): 1776. Bibcode:1967PhRv..164.1776I. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.164.1776.
  30. Carter, B. (1971). "Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom". Elementary Particles and Fields. Physical Review Letters (Letter). 26 (6): 331. Bibcode:1971PhRvL..26..331C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.331.
  31. Carter, B. (1977). "The vacuum black hole uniqueness theorem and its conceivable generalisations". Proceedings of the 1st Marcel Grossmann meeting on general relativity. pp. 243–254.
  32. Chruściel PT, Costa JL, Heusler M (2012). "Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond". Living Reviews in Relativity (Article). 15 (7) 7. arXiv: 1205.6112 . Bibcode:2012LRR....15....7C. doi: 10.12942/lrr-2012-7 . PMC   5255892 . PMID   28179837.
  33. Penrose, Roger (1996). "Chandrasekhar, black holes, and singularities". Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy (Article). 17 (3–4): 213–231. Bibcode:1996JApA...17..213P. doi:10.1007/BF02702305.
  34. Penrose, R. (1965). "Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities" (PDF). Physical Review Letters . 14 (3): 57. Bibcode:1965PhRvL..14...57P. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57 . S2CID   116755736. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 October 2020.
  35. Ford, L. H. (2003). "The Classical Singularity Theorems and Their Quantum Loopholes". International Journal of Theoretical Physics . 42 (6): 1219–1227. arXiv: gr-qc/0301045 . Bibcode:2003gr.qc.....1045F. doi:10.1023/A:1025754515197. S2CID   14404560.
  36. Hawking, Stephen (18 October 1966). "The Occurrence of Singularities in Cosmology" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 294 (1439): 511–521. Bibcode:1966RSPSA.294..511H. doi:10.1098/rspa.1966.0221. JSTOR   2415489 via JSTOR.
  37. Hewish, A.; et al. (1968). "Observation of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source". Nature . 217 (5130): 709–713. Bibcode:1968Natur.217..709H. doi:10.1038/217709a0. S2CID   4277613.
  38. Pilkington, J. D. H.; et al. (1968). "Observations of some further Pulsed Radio Sources". Nature . 218 (5137): 126–129. Bibcode:1968Natur.218..126P. doi:10.1038/218126a0. S2CID   4253103.
  39. Hewish, A. (1970). "Pulsars". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics . 8 (1): 265–296. Bibcode:1970ARA&A...8..265H. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.08.090170.001405.
  40. Boissoneault, Lorraine (28 February 2018). "Fifty Years Ago, a Grad Student's Discovery Changed the Course of Astrophysics". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  41. Rolston, Bruce (10 November 1997), The First Black Hole, University of Toronto, archived from the original on 7 March 2008, retrieved 11 March 2008
  42. Shipman, H. L.; Yu, Z; Du, Y.W (1975), "The implausible history of triple star models for Cygnus X-1 Evidence for a black hole", Astrophysical Letters, 16 (1): 9–12, Bibcode:1975ApL....16....9S, doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00384-4
  43. Bardeen, J. M.; Carter, B.; Hawking, S. W. (1973). "The four laws of black hole mechanics". Communications in Mathematical Physics . 31 (2): 161–170. Bibcode:1973CMaPh..31..161B. doi:10.1007/BF01645742. MR   0334798. S2CID   54690354. Zbl   1125.83309. Archived from the original on 16 May 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
  44. Hawking, S. W. (1974). "Black hole explosions?". Nature. 248 (5443): 30–31. Bibcode:1974Natur.248...30H. doi:10.1038/248030a0. S2CID   4290107.
  45. Remillard, Ronald A.; McClintock, Jeffrey E. (22 September 2006). "X-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 44: 49–92. arXiv: astro-ph/0606352 . Bibcode:2006ARA&A..44...49R. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532. ISSN   0066-4146.
  46. Herbert, Friedman (2002). "From the ionosphere to high energy astronomy – a personal experience". The Century of Space Science. Springer. ISBN   0-7923-7196-8.
  47. Liu, C. Z.; Li, T. P. (2004). "X-Ray Spectral Variability in Cygnus X-1". The Astrophysical Journal. 611 (2): 1084–1090. arXiv: astro-ph/0405246 . Bibcode:2004ApJ...611.1084L. doi:10.1086/422209. S2CID   208868049.
  48. 1 2 Bowyer, S.; Byram, E. T.; Chubb, T. A.; Friedman, H. (1965). "Cosmic X-ray Sources". Science. 147 (3656): 394–398. Bibcode:1965Sci...147..394B. doi:10.1126/science.147.3656.394. PMID   17832788. S2CID   206565068.
  49. Maron, O.; Kijak, J.; Kramer, M.; Wielebinski, R. (2000). "Pulsar spectra of radio emission". Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series. 147 (2): 195–203. arXiv: astro-ph/0010233 . Bibcode:2000A&AS..147..195M. doi:10.1051/aas:2000298.
  50. Webster, B. Louise; Murdin, Paul (1972). "Cygnus X-1—a Spectroscopic Binary with a Heavy Companion?". Nature. 235 (5332): 37–38. Bibcode:1972Natur.235...37W. doi:10.1038/235037a0. S2CID   4195462.
  51. Bolton, C. T. (1972). "Identification of Cygnus X-1 with HDE 226868". Nature. 235 (5336): 271–273. Bibcode:1972Natur.235..271B. doi:10.1038/235271b0. S2CID   4222070.
  52. 1 2 Rolston, Bruce (10 November 1997). "The First Black Hole". University of Toronto. Archived from the original on 7 March 2008. Retrieved 11 March 2008.
  53. Shipman, H. L.; Yu, Z.; Du, Y. W. (1975). "The implausible history of triple star models for Cygnus X-1 Evidence for a black hole". Astrophysical Letters. 16 (1): 9–12. Bibcode:1975ApL....16....9S. doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00384-4.
  54. Lynden-Bell, D. (1969). "Galactic Nuclei as Collapsed Old Quasars". Nature. 223 (5207): 690–694. Bibcode:1969Natur.223..690L. doi:10.1038/223690a0.
  55. Rees, Martin J. (1984). "Black Hole Models for Active Galactic Nuclei". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 22: 471–506. Bibcode:1984ARA&A..22..471R. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.22.090184.002351.
  56. Ferrarese, Laura; Ford, Holland (2005). "Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei: Past, Present and Future Research". Space Science Reviews. 116 (3–4): 523–624. arXiv: astro-ph/0411247 . Bibcode:2005SSRv..116..523F. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-3947-6.
  57. Peterson, Bradley M. (2014). "Measuring the Masses of Supermassive Black Holes". Space Science Reviews. 183 (1–4): 253–275. Bibcode:2014SSRv..183..253P. doi:10.1007/s11214-013-9987-4.
  58. Merritt, David (1999). "Black holes and galaxy evolution". In Combes, F.; Mamon, G. A.; Charmandaris, V. (eds.). Dynamics of Galaxies: from the Early Universe to the Present. Vol. 197. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. pp.  221–232. arXiv: astro-ph/9910546 . Bibcode:2000ASPC..197..221M. ISBN   978-1-58381-024-8.
  59. Tremaine, Scott; Gebhardt, Karl; Bender, Ralf; Bower, Gary; Dressler, Alan; Faber, S. M.; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Green, Richard; Grillmair, Carl; Ho, Luis C.; Kormendy, John; Lauer, Tod R.; Magorrian, John; Pinkney, Jason; Richstone, Douglas (2002). "The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation". The Astrophysical Journal. 574 (2): 740–753. arXiv: astro-ph/0203468 . Bibcode:2002ApJ...574..740T. doi:10.1086/341002.
  60. Ferrarese, Laura; Merritt, David (2000). "A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies". The Astrophysical Journal. 539 (1): L9–L12. arXiv: astro-ph/0006053 . Bibcode:2000ApJ...539L...9F. doi:10.1086/312838.
  61. Nelson, Charles H.; Green, Richard F.; Bower, Gary; Gebhardt, Karl; Weistrop, Donna (2004). "The Relationship Between Black Hole Mass and Velocity Dispersion in Seyfert 1 Galaxies". The Astrophysical Journal. 615 (2): 652–661. arXiv: astro-ph/0407383 . Bibcode:2004ApJ...615..652N. doi:10.1086/424657.
  62. Genzel, R.; Eckart, A.; Ott, T.; Eisenhauer, F. (1997). "On the nature of the dark mass in the centre of the Milky Way". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 291: 219–234. doi: 10.1093/mnras/291.1.219 .
  63. Ghez, A. M.; Klein, B. L.; Morris, M.; Becklin, E. E. (1998). "High Proper-Motion Stars in the Vicinity of Sagittarius A*: Evidence for a Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy". The Astrophysical Journal. 509 (2): 678–686. arXiv: astro-ph/9807210 . Bibcode:1998ApJ...509..678G. doi:10.1086/306528.
  64. Abbott, B.P.; et al. (2016). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger". Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (6) 061102. arXiv: 1602.03837 . Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116f1102A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. PMID   26918975. S2CID   124959784.
  65. 1 2 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and The Virgo Collaboration (2016). "An improved analysis of GW150914 using a fully spin-precessing waveform model". Physical Review X. 6 (4) 041014. arXiv: 1606.01210 . Bibcode:2016PhRvX...6d1014A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041014. S2CID   18217435.
  66. Abbott, Benjamin P.; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (2016). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger". Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (6) 061102. arXiv: 1602.03837 . Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116f1102A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. PMID   26918975. S2CID   124959784.
  67. "Facts". LIGO. Archived from the original on 4 July 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2017. This is equivalent to measuring the distance from Earth to the nearest star to an accuracy smaller than the width of a human hair! (that is, to Proxima Centauri at 4.0208×1013 km).
  68. "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2017". Nobel Foundation.
  69. Burtnyk, Kimberly (20 March 2025). "LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Announce the 200th Gravitational Wave Detection of O4!". LIGO Caltech. Retrieved 22 October 2025.
  70. Event Horizon Telescope, The (2019). "First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole". The Astrophysical Journal . 875 (1): L1. arXiv: 1906.11238 . Bibcode:2019ApJ...875L...1E. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 . S2CID   145906806.
  71. Bouman, Katherine L.; Johnson, Michael D.; Zoran, Daniel; Fish, Vincent L.; Doeleman, Sheperd S.; Freeman, William T. (2016). "Computational Imaging for VLBI Image Reconstruction". 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 913–922. arXiv: 1512.01413 . doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.105. hdl:1721.1/103077. ISBN   978-1-4673-8851-1. S2CID   9085016.
  72. Gardiner, Aidan (12 April 2018). "When a Black Hole Finally Reveals Itself, It Helps to Have Our Very Own Cosmic Reporter—Astronomers announced Wednesday that they had captured the first image of a black hole. The Times's Dennis Overbye answers readers' questions". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 15 April 2019.
  73. "How many telescopes are currently in the EHT network?". Event Horizon Telescope. Retrieved 22 October 2025.
  74. Lutz, Ota (8 October 2024). "How Scientists Captured the First Image of a Black Hole". NASA.gov. Retrieved 22 October 2025.
  75. Chown, Marcus (12 April 2019). "The M87 image will change our understanding of black holes, but why was the photo so hard to capture?". BBC Science Focus Magazine. Retrieved 22 October 2025.
  76. "Astronomers Reveal First Image of the Black Hole at the Heart of Our Galaxy". Event Horizon Telescope. 12 May 2022.
  77. Chakrabarti, Sukanya; Simon, Joshua D.; Craig, Peter A.; Reggiani, Henrique; Brandt, Timothy D.; Guhathakurta, Puragra; Dalba, Paul A.; Kirby, Evan N.; Chang, Philip; Hey, Daniel R.; Savino, Alessandro; Geha, Marla; Thompson, Ian B. (1 July 2023). "A Noninteracting Galactic Black Hole Candidate in a Binary System with a Main-sequence Star". The Astronomical Journal. 166 (1): 6. arXiv: 2210.05003 . Bibcode:2023AJ....166....6C. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/accf21 . ISSN   0004-6256.
  78. El-Badry, Kareem; Rix, Hans-Walter; Quataert, Eliot; Howard, Andrew W.; Isaacson, Howard; Fuller, Jim; Hawkins, Keith; Breivik, Katelyn; Wong, Kaze W. K.; Rodriguez, Antonio C.; Conroy, Charlie; Shahaf, Sahar; Mazeh, Tsevi; Arenou, Frédéric; Burdge, Kevin B.; Bashi, Dolev; Faigler, Simchon; Weisz, Daniel R.; Seeburger, Rhys; Monter, Silvia Almada; Wojno, Jennifer (2023). "A Sun-like star orbiting a black hole". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 518 (1): 1057–1085. arXiv: 2209.06833 . Bibcode:2023MNRAS.518.1057E. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140 .
  79. El-Badry, Kareem; Rix, Hans-Walter; et al. (2 November 2022). "A Sun-like star orbiting a black hole". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 518 (1): 1057–1085. arXiv: 2209.06833 . Bibcode:2023MNRAS.518.1057E. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140 .
  80. "Astronomers Discover Closest Black Hole to Earth". noirlab.edu. NOIRLab. 4 November 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  81. El-Badry, Kareem; Rix, Hans-Walter; Cendes, Yvette; Rodriguez, Antonio C.; Conroy, Charlie; Quataert, Eliot; Hawkins, Keith; Zari, Eleonora; Hobson, Melissa; Breivik, Katelyn; Rau, Arne; Berger, Edo; Shahaf, Sahar; Seeburger, Rhys; Burdge, Kevin B. (1 February 2023). "A red giant orbiting a black hole". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 521 (3): 4323–4348. arXiv: 2302.07880 . Bibcode:2023MNRAS.521.4323E. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad799 .
  82. Panuzzo, P.; Mazeh, T.; Arenou, F.; Holl, B.; Caffau, E. (2024). "Discovery of a dormant 33 solar-mass black hole in pre-release Gaia astrometry". The Astrophysical Journal. 686: L2. arXiv: 2404.10486 . Bibcode:2024A&A...686L...2G. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449763 .
  83. Poffenberger, Leah. "2020 Nobel Prize in Physics". American Physical Society. Retrieved 20 October 2025.
  84. "Oxford Mathematician Roger Penrose jointly wins the Nobel Prize in Physics". University of Oxford. 6 October 2020. Retrieved 20 October 2025.
  85. "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020". NobelPrize.org. Archived from the original on 24 April 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  86. "Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020". Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  87. Overbye, Dennis; Taylor, Derrick Bryson (6 October 2020). "Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to 3 Scientists for Work on Black Holes". The New York Times . Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  88. "Pioneering Physicist John Wheeler Dies at 96". Scientific American . Archived from the original on 28 November 2016. Retrieved 27 November 2016.
  89. Overbye, Dennis (14 April 2008). "John A. Wheeler, Physicist Who Coined the Term 'Black Hole,' Is Dead at 96". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 22 November 2016. Retrieved 27 November 2016.