Judiciary of Indonesia

Last updated

The Supreme Court building in Jakarta Gedung Mahkamah Agung RI.JPG
The Supreme Court building in Jakarta

The Judiciary of Indonesia constitutionally consists of the Supreme Court of Indonesia (Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, abbreviated into MA), the Constitutional Court of Indonesia (Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, abbreviated into MK), and the lesser court system under the Supreme Court. These lesser courts are categorically subdivided into the public courts (Peradilan Umum), religious courts (Peradilan Agama), state administrative courts (Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara), and military courts (Peradilan Militer). [1]

Contents

The Public Prosecution Service (Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia), headed by the Attorney General, is not part of the judiciary; they are part of the executive branch of the government, with the state prosecutors themselves as civil servants, and the Attorney General themselves only answers to the President of Indonesia.

Law

Indonesian law is a continuation and improvement of the Dutch colonial laws, Islamic family laws, and aspects of Adat laws (unwritten, traditional rules still observed in the Indonesian society). The highest law of the land is the 1945 Constitution, amended four times from 1999 to 2002 during the early Reformasi period. Under the current rules on Indonesian lawmaking, the type of laws enacted by the government are hierarchically structured as:

  1. The 1945 Constitution (Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945)
  2. Resolutions of the People's Consultative Assembly (Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat)
  3. Acts (Undang-Undang) and Government Regulations in-lieu-of Acts (Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang)
  4. Government Regulations (Peraturan Pemerintah)
  5. Presidential Regulations (Peraturan Presiden)
  6. Provincial Ordinances (Peraturan Daerah Provinsi)
  7. City Ordinances or Regency Ordinances (Peraturan Daerah Kota or Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten)

Indonesian law ascribed to civil law system, inherited from the Dutch implementation of the Roman legal system (Roman-Dutch law), as well as the Napoleonic Code. The judicial system is inquisitorial in nature, where the court of law actively pursue the facts of the case and dispute, working closely with other elements of the Indonesian law enforcement agencies. The judges reach a verdict after examining the evidences, and prefer applying statutory laws: Stare decisis is not widely used. Trials by jury system is not implemented.

Indonesia is a decentralized, unitary state, and thus there is no separation between central and regional judiciary system; All judicial system is set on a hierarchical, but contiguous top-down chain of command.

Courts System

Courts structure

Indonesian court system is set on basic three-level courts: [2]

Supreme Court

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, or the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia is the highest court of law. It is the final court of appeal for criminal and civil verdicts made in the lesser courts, thus they are able to overrule lesser courts' verdicts. It resolves dispute on the matter of judicial jurisdiction, and hears request to review previous Supreme Court verdicts due to newly discovered evidence or due to judicial error. The latter legal action is known as Peninjauan Kembali, abbreviated into PK.

Aside from administration of justice, the Supreme Court are tasked to nominate three people to fill the position for the justices of the Constitutional Court, reviews laws and regulations lower than Acts jointly enacted by the DPR and the President (Judicial Review), and provide opinions as a constitutional requirement for the President before granting executive pardon and legal rehabilitation of convicts. [3]

The Supreme Court is headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia, currently by Muhammad Syarifuddin. [4] [5]

Constitutional Court

The Constitutional Court building in Jakarta IndonesianConstitutionalCourt.jpg
The Constitutional Court building in Jakarta

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, or the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia rules over disputes specified in Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution, as well as other functions enshrined by Laws. It is formed in 2003 during the Reformasi period, as the result of the Third Amendment of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court have jurisdiction over cases concerning: [6]

The current Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia is Anwar Usman, who have headed the Constitutional Court since 2015.

Lesser Courts

The four subdivisions of the lesser courts hear its final appeal in the Supreme Court.

Public Courts

Pangkalpinang District Court building Pengadilan Negeri Pangkalpinang.jpg
Pangkalpinang District Court building

Peradilan Umum or the Public Courts consists of the first-level District Court (Pengadilan Negeri) and the second-level High Courts (Pengadilan Tinggi), after which further appeals go to the Supreme Court. They hear criminal and civil cases involving Indonesian citizens or foreign citizens in Indonesia, as well as Indonesian and foreign legal entities who are based in Indonesia or if they chose to have their case heard in Indonesian court.

District Courts have original jurisdiction to hear cases within the city and regency, while High Courts have appellate jurisdiction at the provincial level, based in the provincial capital. [7]

There are specialized courts formed within the system of first-level public courts, such as:

  • Juvenile courts (Pengadilan Anak), which function under special juvenile criminal procedural system;
  • Human rights courts (Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia or Pengadilan HAM), which hear cases of human rights violation conducted by the government or government officials;
  • Industrial relations courts (Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial), which hear cases of industrial relations dispute, industrial conflict of interests, prejudiced termination of employment, and resolving dispute between unions in the same workplace;
  • Commercial courts (Pengadilan Niaga) which hear cases of corporate bankruptcy, debt suspension, intellectual property disputes, and bank liquidation;
  • Fishery courts (Pengadilan Perikanan) which hear cases of fishery crime – that is, illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing; and
  • Anti-corruption courts (Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi or Pengadilan Tipikor) which hear cases of corruption, graft, bribery, money laundering, and other acts considered to be corruption crime.

Religious Courts

Ambon High Religious Court building Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Ambon.jpg
Ambon High Religious Court building

Peradilan Agama or the Religious Courts are for Muslim citizens to resolve civil matters, such as marriage, inheritance, and property donated for religious purposes ( waqf ). [8] They are the first-level Religious Court (Pengadilan Agama) and the second-level Religious High Court (Pengadilan Tinggi Agama). Despite the name, they do not hear cases concerning religions other that Islamic cases; Cases concerning civil cases of other religions are heard in the public courts.

In Aceh, special first-level Sharia Court (Mahkamah Syar'iyah) and second-level Provincial Sharia Court of Aceh (Mahkamah Syar'iyah Provinsi Aceh) are vested with special authority, owing to Aceh's special status within Indonesia. These special courts, in addition to basic religious courts' authority, have jurisdiction over Islamic morality criminal cases ( Jinayat ) regulated by local ordinances ( Qanun ), such as public drunkenness, sales of alcoholic beverages, gambling, and other moral crimes incompatible with Islamic values. Under this system, the courts are also empowered to deliver punishments not available under Indonesian laws, such as whipping. [9] [10]

State Administrative Courts

Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara or the StateAdministrative Courts were established in 1986 as a result of a Law intended to ensure that people would not be treated arbitrarily by government officials or institutions. Initially formed in 1981 as a specialized court under the public courts system, the State Administrative Courts were formalized under Law No. 5/1986 ('State Administrative Courts Act'). [11] They rule in disputes involving the state officials or bodies, both within central and regional officials or institutions. [12] The object of all state administrative proceedings are actions – proven with the issuance of a decision (Surat Keputusan or Beschikking) – or lack of actions by the government, considered harmful against the interest of the citizens. The courts also hear cases which include civil servants against their superiors of the internal bureaucracy of the government itself. [13]

The state administrative courts are the first-level State Administrative Court (Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara) with original jurisdiction to hear state administrative disputes, and the second-level State Administrative High Court (Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara) with appellate jurisdiction from cases heard in the first-level court. The Supreme Court serves as the final court of appeal.

There is one specialized court created within the system of the administrative courts – the Tax Court (Pengadilan Pajak).

Military Courts

Peradilan Militer, or the Military Courts deal with criminal and military administrative cases involving members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. [14] They are the first-level Military Court (Pengadilan Militer, abbreviated into Dilmi) with original jurisdiction over cases regarding military personnel whose ranks are no higher than a captain, and the second-level High Military Court (Pengadilan Militer Tinggi, abbreviated into Dilmilti) hear appeals against decisions of the first-level courts, as well as having original jurisdiction over cases involving military personnel with ranks of a major and above. [15]

Another second-level Primary Military Court (Pengadilan Militer Utama, abbreviated into Dilmiltama) hears appeals against decisions of the High Military Courts and also decides upon issues of jurisdiction of the various military courts. [15]

During armed conflict, Battlefield Military Court (Pengadilan Militer Pertempuran) with wartime jurisdiction can be mobilized to hear criminal cases of military personnel and reach a verdict against said military personnel on the battlefield. [15]

Judicial Commission

Other than the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia or the Judicial Commission exercise judicial authority under the Constitution. Specifically, they exist to ensure the independence of the judges and the judicial system from unnecessary intervention and involvement. The laws tasked the Judicial Commission to: [16]

  1. Nominate candidates of judges (and ad hoc judges) of the Supreme Court to be approved by the DPR, by:
    1. receiving applications of the candidates;
    2. running an open selection process of the candidates;
    3. selecting qualified candidates to be nominated; and
    4. formally nominated the candidates to be approved by the DPR.
  2. Maintain and enforce judges' code of conducts and code of ethics, by:
    1. oversee and observe judges' professional conducts;
    2. receive public reports regarding allegations of judges' violation of code of conducts and code of ethics;
    3. verify, clarify, and investigate the public reports and allegations of judges' violation of code of conducts and code of ethics;
    4. protect and maintain the judges' professionalism from unfounded allegations; and
    5. promoting the judges' professional capacity and welfare.

Personnel

Judges

Hakim or Judges are state officials vested with judicial authority to hear cases, resolve disputes, and reach a verdict in civil and criminal cases. Within the Indonesian criminal procedural system, they are one of the most important subjects, aside from the law enforcement (police force), the prosecutors, and the correctional facilities. [17]

Aside from regular judges, there exist Hakim Ad hoc or Ad hoc Judges, retired judges who have the judicial experience and skill to be appointed and assigned to hear cases in chambers for a certain period of times. [18] They are most prominently assigned to the human rights courts, due to the nature of the cases, which might involve active state and government officials, and the ad hoc judges' authority may eliminate any conflict of interests. [19]

Judges decide cases based on statutory law. If there is no applicable statutes, judges must apply unwritten law and decide cases with wisdom and full responsibility to God. [20]

Prosecutors

Jaksa or Prosecutors are government officials of the Public Prosecution Service of Indonesia, headed by the Attorney General, and vested with judicial authority to prosecute criminal cases and execute court orders and sentencings. They can also act as solicitor general, in which they represent the state and the government in civil and state administration cases involving the state and the government. In criminal cases, they are known by the term Jaksa Penuntut Umum (Public Prosecutor), while in civil and administrative cases they are known by the term Jaksa Pengacara Negara (State Attorney).

Parallel to the military courts, the Oditurs of the Office of the Military Prosecutors (Oditurat) function as the relevant authority to prosecute and investigate criminal cases of members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. The Oditurat are headed by the Oditur Jenderal, which serves as the most senior prosecutor within the Indonesian military judicial affairs.

Attorneys

Pengacara (sometimes the terms Advokat or Penasihat Hukum are used) are lawyers who represent and advise defendants in criminal proceedings and parties in civil cases.

Law enforcement agencies

Prominent law enforcement agencies include the National Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission .

Correctional agencies

Lembaga Pemasyarakatan or Lapas are government-ran correctional facilities, which includes prisons for adults, women, juveniles, corruption convicts, and convicts of terrorism charges. They are administered by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights.

Court clerks, bailiffs, and secretaries

Panitera or the court clerks ran the judicial administrative aspect of the courts. They keep records of case proceedings, maintain records of cases of their assigned courts, release official copies of court documents, and execute civil case verdicts. Sometimes they are assigned to appear in court to help administer the oaths. [21]

Juru Sita or the bailiffs are the official executor of the court orders. They often hand-deliver court orders and summons, execute court seizures and safekeepings of properties and their attached documents, and communicate and cooperate with other agencies regarding their actions. [21]

Sekretaris or the secretaries ran the non-judicial (general affairs) administrative aspect of the courts. They manage the court's assets and its procurement, oversee human resources, and ran the financial affairs of the court. [21]

Related Research Articles

A court-martial or court martial is a military court or a trial conducted in such a court. A court-martial is empowered to determine the guilt of members of the armed forces subject to military law, and, if the defendant is found guilty, to decide upon punishment. In addition, courts-martial may be used to try prisoners of war for war crimes. The Geneva Conventions require that POWs who are on trial for war crimes be subject to the same procedures as would be the holding military's own forces. Finally, courts-martial can be convened for other purposes, such as dealing with violations of martial law, and can involve civilian defendants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial Yuan</span> Judicial branch of Taiwan

The Judicial Yuan is the judicial branch of the government of Taiwan. It runs a Constitutional Court and oversees all systems of courts of Taiwan, including ordinary courts like the supreme court, high courts, district courts as well as special courts like administrative courts and disciplinary courts. By Taiwanese law, the Judicial Yuan holds the following powers:

The court system of Canada is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. In the courts, the judiciary interpret and apply the law of Canada. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Russia</span> Statutory body with hierarchical structure

The Judiciary of Russia interprets and applies the law of Russia. It is defined under the Constitution and law with a hierarchical structure with the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court at the apex. The district courts are the primary criminal trial courts, and the regional courts are the primary appellate courts. The judiciary is governed by the All-Russian Congress of Judges and its Council of Judges, and its management is aided by the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court, the Higher Qualification Board of Judges, and the Ministry of Justice, and the various courts' presidents. And although there are many officers of the court, including jurors, the Prosecutor General remains the most powerful component of the Russian judicial system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial system of Turkey</span> National court system of the Republic of Turkey

The judicial system of Turkey is defined by Articles 138 to 160 of the Constitution of Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are binding on all other courts in a nation and are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts. A Supreme Court can also, in certain circumstances, act as a court of original jurisdiction, however, this is typically limited to constitutional law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Indonesia</span> Independent judicial arm of the state of Indonesia

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia is the independent judicial arm of the state. It maintains a system of courts and sits above the other courts and is the final court of appeal. It can also re-examine cases if new evidence emerges.

Law of Indonesia is based on a civil law system, intermixed with local customary law and Dutch law. Before the Dutch presence and colonization began in the sixteenth century, indigenous kingdoms ruled the archipelago independently with their own custom laws, known as adat. Foreign influences from India, China and the Middle East have not only affected culture, but also the customary adat laws. The people of Aceh in Sumatra, for instance, observe their own sharia law, while ethnic groups like the Toraja in Sulawesi still follow their animistic customary law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Colombia</span>

The judiciary of Colombia is a branch of the State of Colombia that interprets and applies the laws of Colombia, to ensure equal justice under law, and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The judiciary comprises a hierarchical system of courts presided over by judges, magistrates and other adjudicators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orders, decorations, and medals of Indonesia</span>

Awards and decorations of the Republic of Indonesia are both military and civilian awards for service and personal contributions to the Republic of Indonesia. According to the Constitution of Indonesia, Chapter III Article 15: "The President grants titles, decorations and other honors as regulated by Law".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional Court of Indonesia</span>

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia is one of the apex courts in Indonesia along with the Indonesian Supreme Court. Its primary role is reviewing the constitutionality of Acts (undang-undang). It also has other functions, including resolving disputes over the powers of state institutions, settling disputes over the results of general elections, deciding on the dissolution of political parties, and supervising impeachment. The last two functions have never been exercised by the Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Cyprus</span>

The law of Cyprus is a legal system which applies within the Republic of Cyprus. Although Cypriot law is extensively codified, it is still heavily based on English common law in the sense that the fundamental principle of precedent applies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of Law and Human Rights</span> Ministry branch of Indonesia

The Ministry of Law and Human Rights is an Indonesian ministry that administers laws and human rights. It is responsible to the president, and is led by the Minister of Law and Human Rights, Yasonna Laoly, since 27 October 2014. The first minister was Soepomo.

The Judiciary of Albania interprets and applies the law of Albania. Albania's judicial system is a civil law system divided between courts with regular civil and criminal jurisdiction and administrative courts. Albanian law is codified and based on the French law. It is governed by the High Council of Justice (Këshilli i Lartë i Drejtësisë), and its management is aided by the office of the President of Albania, the Ministry of Justice, and the various courts chairpersons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attorney General's Office of Indonesia</span>

The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is the competent authority to advise the Government of Indonesia on matters of law. It serves as the central organization for the Indonesian Public Prosecution Service. The Attorney General's Office is seated in the national capital Jakarta.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic</span> Highest court in the Dominican Republic

The Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic is the highest court existing in the Republic and is, therefore, the head of the judiciary in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Islamic criminal law in Aceh</span> Sharia criminal law in Aceh, Indonesia

The province of Aceh in Indonesia enforces some provisions of Islamic criminal law, the sole Indonesian province to do so. In Aceh, Islamic criminal law is called jinayat. The laws that implement it are called Qanun Jinayat or Hukum Jinayat, roughly meaning "Islamic criminal code". Although the largely-secular laws of Indonesia apply in Aceh, the provincial government passed additional regulations, some derived from Islamic criminal law, after Indonesia authorized the province to enact regional regulations and granted Aceh special autonomy to implement Islamic law. Offences under the provisions include alcohol consumption, production and distribution, gambling, adultery, rape, sexual harassment, certain intimacies outside marriage, and certain homosexual acts. Punishments include caning, fines, and imprisonment. There is no provision for stoning; an attempt to introduce it in 2009 was vetoed by Governor Irwandi Yusuf. In 2016 Aceh processed 324 first instance court cases under Islamic criminal law, and carried out at least 100 caning sentences.

In the Indonesian military, titular and honorary ranks are two different types of special military ranks. Unlike the normal rank in the Indonesian military, titular and honorary ranks could be given to civilians who served temporarily in the military or contributed to the military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public Prosecution Service of Indonesia</span> Indonesian government agency

The Public Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia is the government agency of Indonesia authorized for conducting public prosecution in Indonesia. It has other duties and authorities over certain matters as prescribed by laws.

References

  1. "UU No. 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum [JDIH BPK RI]". peraturan.bpk.go.id. Retrieved 18 December 2021.
  2. Saragi, Marry Margaretha (21 June 2013). "Mengapa Peradilan di Indonesia Bertingkat-tingkat?". Hukumonline. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  3. Angkouw, Kevin (30 May 2014). "FUNGSI MAHKAMAH AGUNG SEBAGAI PENGAWAS INTERNAL TUGAS HAKIM DALAM PROSES PERADILAN". Lex Administratum. 2 (2). ISSN   2337-6074.
  4. Triyono, Agus (8 February 2012). "Hatta Ali Elected New Supreme Court Chief Justice". The Jakarta Globe.
  5. Bambang Waluyo (1992) pp. 98, 112-113
  6. "Kedudukan dan Kewenangan | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia". www.mkri.id. Retrieved 19 December 2021.
  7. Waluyo (1992) , pp. 15–16, 34
  8. Bambang Waluyo (1992) p42
  9. Lindsey & Sumner. "Courting reform: Indonesia's Islamic Courts and Justice for the Poor" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 30 August 2012.
  10. "Indonesia". Freedom in the World 2012. Freedom House. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  11. "Sejarah Pengadilan | Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta" . Retrieved 19 December 2021.
  12. Bambang Waluyo (1992) pp. 65, 68
  13. Lotulung, Paulus Effendi (6 December 1991). "Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara". Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan. 21 (6): 579–587. doi:10.21143/jhp.vol21.no6.997. ISSN   2503-1465.
  14. Bambang Waluyo (1992) p88
  15. 1 2 3 "SEJARAH PERADILAN MILITER DI INDONESIA". www.dilmilti-jakarta.go.id. Retrieved 19 December 2021.
  16. Law No. 18/2011
  17. Mulingka, Firman A. (12 August 2015). "FUNGSI DAN KEDUDUKAN HAKIM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANAN KAITANNYA DENGAN KEMANDIRIAN HAKIM". Lex Administratum. 3 (6). ISSN   2337-6074.
  18. "Situs Web Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI". kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id. 24 August 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  19. "MA: Hakim Ad Hoc Berada di Lima Pengadilan Khusus | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia". www.mkri.id. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  20. Bambang Waluyo (1992) p11
  21. 1 2 3 "Tugas Pokok & Fungsi". www.pn-stabat.go.id. Retrieved 20 December 2021.

Further reading