Serpopard

Last updated
Serpopard
Uruk3000BCE.jpg
Modern impression. This design is also sometimes qualified as a monstrous lioness. Louvre
Origin
Country Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamian
Oxford Palette from Hierakonpolis. Ashmolean Museum. Ceremonial Palette from Hierakonpolis-2.jpg
Oxford Palette from Hierakonpolis. Ashmolean Museum.
3000 BC cylinder seal of Uruk with serpopard design. Cylinder seal lions Louvre MNB1167 n2.jpg
3000 BC cylinder seal of Uruk with serpopard design.

The serpopard (also known as monstrous lion) is a mythical animal known from ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian art. The word "serpopard" is a modern coinage. It is a portmanteau of "serpent" and "leopard", derived from the interpretation that the creature represents an animal with the body of a leopard and the long neck and head of a serpent. However, they have also been interpreted as "serpent-necked lions". There is no known name for the creature in any ancient texts.

Contents

Images

The image is featured specifically on decorated cosmetic palettes from the Predynastic period of Egypt, and more extensively, as design motifs on cylinder seals in the Protoliterate period of Mesopotamia (circa 3500–3000 BC). Examples include the Narmer Palette and the Oxford Palette. The cylinder seal of Uruk (image above) displays the motif very clearly. Typically, two creatures are depicted, with their necks intertwined. They are also occasionally depicted on birth tusks (also known as amuletic wands). One example is an amuletic wand held in the British Museum's collections.

Amuletic Wand with serpopard, Middle Kingdom. British Museum. Amuletic wand.jpg
Amuletic Wand with serpopard, Middle Kingdom. British Museum.
Narmer Palette with central depression for mixing cosmetics. (3200-3000 BC) Narmer Palette serpopard side.jpg
Narmer Palette with central depression for mixing cosmetics. (3200–3000 BC)

Interpretations

The image generally is classified as a feline, and with close inspection resembles an unusually long-necked lioness. It bears the characteristic tuft of the species at the end of the tail, there are no spots, the round-eared head most closely resembles the lioness rather than a serpent, because serpents do not have ears, and there are no typical serpent features such as scales, tongue, or reptilian head shape. [1]

It has been suggested that in Ancient Egyptian art the serpopard represents "a symbol of the chaos that reigned beyond Egypt's borders", which the king must tame. They are normally shown conquered or restrained, as in the Narmer Palette, or attacking other animals. But in Mesopotamian art they are shown in pairs, with intertwined necks. [2]

Mesopotamian use of these "serpent-necked lions" and other animals and animal hybrids is seen by some scholars as "manifestations of the chthonic aspect of the god of natural vitality, who is manifest in all life breaking forth from the earth". [3]

Similarly to other ancient peoples, the Egyptians are known for their accurate depictions of the creatures they observed. Their composite creatures have recognizable features of the animals originally representing those deities, merged into novel creatures.[ citation needed ]

Lionesses played an important role in the religious concepts of both Upper and Lower Egypt, and are likely to have been designated as animals associated with protection and royalty. The long necks could be a simple exaggeration, used as a framing feature in an artistic motif, either forming the cosmetic-mixing area, as in the Narmer Palette, or surrounding it, as in the Small Palette.

Depictions of similar fantastic animals also are known from Elam and Mesopotamia, [4] as well as many other cultures.

Due to birth tusks being associated with the protection of mother and child during birth or birth ceremonies, [5] serpopards are thought to play a role in this protection. [6]

Additionally, it has been suggested that serpopards form a barrier of protection between the netherworld and the human world. [7] On some palettes, such as the Narmer Palette, their necks border the circle in which makeup would have been mixed. Since this makeup would have been applied to statues of deities or pharaohs, the makeup may have had to been upheld to a certain standard and protected to ensure quality. [7]

See also

References

  1. "The Narmer Palette. Corpus of Egyptian Late Predynastic Palettes". Xoomer.alice.it. Retrieved 2010-08-23.
  2. Ross, Micah (ed), From the Banks of the Euphrates: Studies in Honor of Alice Louise Slotsky, p. 177, 2008, Eisenbrauns, ISBN   1575061449, 9781575061443, Google books
  3. Henri Frankfort, The Art And Architecture Of The Ancient Orient, Yale University Press 1996, p.37
  4. Michael Rice, Egypt's Making: The Origins of Ancient Egypt, 5000-2000 BC, Routledge 2003, p.68
  5. Pinch, Geraldine (1983). "Childbirth and Female Figurines at Deir el-Medina and el-?Amarna". Orientalia. 52 (3): 405–414. ISSN   0030-5367.
  6. Feasey, Emma (2025). Serpopards: From Ancient to Contemporary. 11-16.
  7. 1 2 Feasey, Emma (2025). Serpopards: From Ancient to Contemporary. 8-9.