The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013

Last updated

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
Emblem of India.svg
Parliament of India
  • An Act to provide for the establishment of a body of Lokpal for the Union and Lokayukta for States to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain public functionaries and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. [1]
Citation 01 of 2014
Territorial extent India
Passed by Rajya Sabha
Passed17 December 2013
Passed by Lok Sabha
Passed18 December 2013
Assented to1 January 2014
Signed by Pranab Mukherjee
Commenced16 January 2014
Status: In force
Legislative history
Title:The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 [2]
History:Introduced in Lok Sabha on 4 August 2011. [3]
Referred to The Parliament's Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances and Law and Justice on 8 August 2011. [4]

Re-introduced in Lok Sabha on 22 December 2011. [5]

Passed by Lok Sabha on 27 December 2011. [6]

Introduced in Rajya Sabha on 29 December 2011. [7]

Re-introduced in Rajya Sabha on 21 May 2012. [8]

Referred to The Select Committee of the Rajya Sabha on 21 May 2012. [9]

Contents

The bill was passed in the Rajya Sabha on 17 December 2013 and in the Lok Sabha on 18 December 2013. [10]

The bill was assented by the President on 1 January 2014. [2]

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, commonly known as The Lokpal Act, is an anti-corruption Act of Indian Parliament in India which "seeks to provide for the establishment of the institution of Lokpal to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain important public functionaries including the Prime Minister, cabinet ministers, members of parliament, Group A officials of the Central Government and for matters connecting them". [11]

The Bill was tabled in the Lok Sabha on 22 December 2011 and was passed by the House on 27 December as The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011. It was subsequently tabled in the Rajya Sabha on 29 December. After a marathon debate that stretched until midnight of the following day, the vote failed to take place for lack of time. [12] On 21 May 2012, it was referred to a Select Committee of the Rajya Sabha for consideration. It was passed in the Rajya Sabha on 17 December 2013 after making certain amendments to the earlier Bill and in the Lok Sabha the next day. [10] It received assent from President Pranab Mukherjee on 1 January 2014 and came into force from 16 January. [13] [14]

The Bill was introduced in the parliament following massive public protests led by anti-corruption crusader Anna Hazare and his associates. [15] The Bill is one of the most widely discussed and debated Bills in India, both by the media and the People of India at large, in recent times. [16] The protests were named among the "Top 10 News Stories of 2011" by the magazine Time . [17] [18] The bill received worldwide media coverage. [19] [20] [21]

In 2011, India ranked 95th in the Corruption Perceptions Index of Transparency International. A recent survey estimated that corruption in India had cost billions of dollars and threatened to derail growth. [22] [23] [24] India lost a staggering $462 billion in illicit financial flows due to tax evasion, crime and corruption post-Independence, according to a report released by Washington-based Global Financial Integrity. [25]

Retired Supreme Court judge Pinaki Chandra Ghose was appointed as the first Lokpal of India by a committee consisting of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Lok Sabha speaker Sumitra Mahajan and Eminent Jurist Mukul Rohatgi on 17 March 2019. [26]

Background

The term Lokpal was coined in 1963 by Laxmi Mall Singhvi, a member of parliament during a parliamentary debate about grievance mechanisms. [27] The Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) headed by Morarji Desai submitted an interim report on "Problems of Redressal of Citizen's Grievances" in 1966. In this report, ARC recommended the creation of two special authorities designated as 'Lokpal' and 'Lokayukta' for redress of citizens' grievances. The word was derived from the Sanskrit words "Lok" (people) and "Pala" (protector/caretaker), meaning 'Caretaker of People'. [28]

Maharashtra was the first state to introduce Lokayukta through The Maharashtra Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayuktas Act in 1971. [29] [30] Presently, there are no Lokayuktas in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Tripura.

The Lokpal bill was first introduced in the Lok Sabha in 1968. The version enacted in 2013 was from a draft prepared in 2010. [31] The bill is an implementation of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. [32] Eleven parliamentary panels have been formed to discuss the Lokpal bill. [33]

The Act for each state says “Every State shall establish a body to be known as the Lokayukta for the State, if not so established, constituted or appointed, by a law made by the State Legislature, to deal with complaints relating to corruption against certain public functionaries, within a period of one year from the date of commencement of this Act”. [34]

Recurring cost of lokpal over the years [35]
YearCost of lokpal (recurring)Status of bill
1968₹300,000The Fourth Lok Sabha dissolved before the bill could be passed by the Rajya Sabha. The bill lapsed.
1971₹2 millionThis bill lapsed on dissolution of the Fifth Lok Sabha.
1977₹2.5 millionThe Sixth Lok Sabha dissolved just before the recommendations of the Joint Select Committee could be considered.
1985₹2.5 millionThis bill was withdrawn by the government.
1989₹3.5 millionThis bill lapsed on dissolution of the Ninth Lok Sabha.
1996₹10 millionThe Standing Committee presented its report to Parliament on 9 May 1996. However, the Lok Sabha was dissolved before government could finalise its stand.
1998₹10 millionThe Twelfth Lok Sabha was dissolved before government could take a view on the recommendations made by The Parliamentary Standing Committee.
2001₹15 millionThe Lok Sabha was dissolved. Hence, the bill lapsed.
2011/2012The Government's version of Lokpal does not have any financial memorandum.Passed by the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Rajya Sabha passed the bill on 17 December 2013. Lok sabha passed the bill on 18 December 2013.

History

2010 draft bill

Anna Hazare's hunger strike at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi Anna Hazare on 2nd day.jpg
Anna Hazare's hunger strike at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi

The 2010 draft [36] was created by the United Progressive Alliance to create an Ombudsman tasked with tackling political corruption. [37] The draft was circulated to various ministries for their review. It provided a mechanism for filing complaints against the prime minister, ministers and MPs. [38] However, civil society groups were not satisfied and rejected it as a toothless body with only recommendatory powers. [39] [40]

Hazare started an indefinite hunger strike on 5 April 2011 to pressure the government to create an ombudsman with the power to deal with corruption in public places as envisaged in the Jan Lokpal Bill. The fast led to nationwide protests in support. The fast ended on 9 April, one day after the government accepted his demands. [41] The government issued a gazette notification on the formation of a joint committee, consisting of government and civil society representatives, to draft the legislation. [42]

Joint draft bill

A Joint Drafting Committee was established, consisting of five ministers and five members of the civil society. The chairman of the Joint Drafting Committee was Pranab Mukherjee. The Committee set 30 June 2011 as the deadline to complete the drafting process. [43] [44]

Ten member Joint Drafting Committee
Member NameParty
Pranab Mukherjee Union Minister of Finance
P. Chidambaram Union Minister of Home Affairs
M. Veerappa Moily Union Minister of Law and Justice
Kapil Sibal Minister of Communication and Information Technology
Salman Khursheed Union Minister of Water Resources
Anna Hazare Civil society
N. Santosh Hegde Civil Society, Retired Judge Supreme Court of India
Shanti Bhushan Civil Society, Former Union Minister of Law and Justice
Prashant Bhushan Civil Society
Arvind Kejriwal Civil Society

First draft meeting

All of the Joint Draft meetings took place at the North Block New Delhi government block 03-2016 img1.jpg
All of the Joint Draft meetings took place at the North Block

The Committee first met on 16 April 2011, in the North Block and lasted for about ninety minutes. [45] Team Anna presented their version of the bill with a slight modification relating to the selection panel to choose the Lokpal and its members. Under the revised proposal, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha were replaced with the Rajya Sabha chairman and the Lok Sabha Speaker. The meeting was allegedly recorded and the Committee claimed that decisions would be made available to the general public. HRD Minister and Committee member Kapil Sibal, said that both the sides were keen that the new Bill should be introduced in the Monsoon session, which would begin early July. [46] [47]

Second draft meeting

The Committee met as planned on 2 May 2011. The meeting was termed "very good" and with "no difference of opinion" between the panel members. [48] Sibal said that the meeting discussed the document presented previously by the civil society members. Prashant Bhushan said, "The meeting was mainly to discuss the basic principles behind the Jan Lokpal Bill. The discussion was on essential features, objects and reasons of the bill which have been prepared according to the main provisions of the UN Convention against Corruption. All signatories of the United Nations Convention against Corruption have to pass this kind of law." [49] [50] In May 2011, the Indian Government had ratified two UN Conventions – the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) and the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (UNTOC) and its three protocols. [51] [52]

Third draft meeting

Kapil Sibbal, member of the Joint Drafting Committee of Lokpal Kapil Sibal.jpg
Kapil Sibbal, member of the Joint Drafting Committee of Lokpal

After the third meeting on 7 May 2011, Bhushan said "Lokpal will have powers to initiate investigation and prosecution and will not need permission from the government. The model on which the financial independence will be based is yet to be decided. Various models were discussed, including from other countries and of institutions like the Supreme Court, the Comptroller and Auditor General and the Central Vigilance Commission." [53]

Kapil Sibal said the meeting was "exceptionally constructive" and added, "The approach was very constructive. There were areas of broad agreement, including the process of appointment of Lokpal which should be transparent." [54] Another group of civil society members led by Aruna Roy and Harsh Mander working for a strong Lokpal Bill, upped its ante against Team Anna. Under the banner of the "National Campaign for People's Right to Information" (NCPRI) [55] they claimed that Anna's diktat could be dangerous and that the government's functioning could not be handled by one group. [56] [57] [ clarification needed ]

Fourth draft meeting

The 23 May meeting in 2011 lasted over three hours and the two sides agreed "in-principle" on half of the 40 basic principles for the anti-graft Lokpal bill proposed by the civil society members. [58] [59] [60]

Fifth draft meeting

At the 30 May 2011 meeting the chairman made it clear during the discussion that the matters pertaining to the exclusion of Prime Minister, Judiciary would be a part of the discussions on the scope of the Lokpal. The Chairman of the Panel announced that the conduct of the MPs' inside Parliament would remain outside its remit of the Lokpal to comply with [Article 105(2)] of the Constitution and that the views of the State and the political parties would be discussed with the civil society members. [61] These announcements created a stalemate between the Committee's two-halves. [62]

Sixth draft meeting

Team Anna boycotted 6 June 2011 meeting, alleging that the police crackdown on Baba Ramdev had "strengthened the doubts" about the government's intentions and demanded that the next meeting be rescheduled because of Hazare's other commitments. [63] Shanti Bhushan produced a letter that was read by the Chair "indicating their inability to attend the meeting" and "that what happened at the Ramlila ground had nothing to do with the proceedings of the Joint Drafting Committee". The chairman suggested that the drafting should be the focus. Post meeting, the draft was to be circulated to the other political parties for their consideration. They rescheduled the seventh meeting to 15 June. [64] [65]

Seventh draft meeting

The two-hour event took place on 15 June 2011, without agreement on several issues. Both sides furnished versions to the Union Cabinet for consideration. [66] Team Anna blamed the government for not being serious, claiming "The government is planning to kill Lokpal before it's born". [67] The civil society members suggested that the Lokpal be empowered to probe corruption cases in instead of the departmental probes and CBI inquiries of the prior approach. The government rejected the idea. Chief Ministers of several BJP-ruled states expressed surprise that they were being consulted before the final draft was ready. Chief ministers of Congress-ruled states backed the Centre's stand and opposed bringing the prime minister under the Lokpal's ambit. BJP-ruled states sought wider deliberations. Opposition parties demanded to comment on the whole bill rather than on the six contentious issues. [68] Anna Team demanded that the audio of the proceedings be made available to them. Hazare threatened to resume an indefinite fast if the bill was not passed by 15 August. [69] [70]

Comparison of Draft Lokpal Bill with the Jan Lokpal Bill [71]
IssuesDraft Lokpal Bill, 2011 (government representatives)Draft Jan Lokpal Bill, 2011 (nominees of Anna Hazare)
CompositionChairperson and 10 members (at least 4 judicial members)Chairperson and 10 members (at least 4 members with legal background). The Chairperson to have extensive knowledge of law.
TenureFive years or till he is 70 yearsFive years or till he is 70 years
Manner of appointmentPresidential appointment on the recommendation of the selection committee.Presidential appointment on the recommendation of the selection committee.
Committee membershipPrime Minister, speaker, Leader of the House of which PM is not member, Minister of Home Affairs, Leader of the Opposition in both Houses, judge of Supreme Court, Chief Justice of a High Court, President of National Academy of Science, Cabinet Secretary (secretary of committee).Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, 2 judges of the Supreme Court, 2 chief justices of a high court, the Chief Election Commission, the CAG, and all previous chairpersons of the Lokpal. The members shall be selected from a list prepared by the Search Committee (10 members including civil society representatives).
QualificationImpeccable integrity with at least 25 years of experience in public affairs, academics, commerce, finance etc. Once appointed, cannot be an MP, MLA or be connected with a political party, business or practice a profession. A judicial member has to be either a Chief Justice of the High Court or a judge of the Supreme Court.A judicial member should have held judicial office for at least 10 years or been an advocate of the High Court or Supreme Court for at least 15 years. All members should be of impeccable integrity with record of public service especially in the field of corruption. Must be a citizen of India at least 45 years old. Must have no case involving moral turpitude framed against him by a court. Cannot have been a government servant within the last 2 years.
RemovalComplaint against members are made to the President who may refer it to the Supreme Court who will conduct an inquiry. The President may remove the member, on the opinion of the Chief Justice, on grounds of bias, corruption, insolvency, paid employment or infirmity.The President removes members on the recommendation of the Supreme Court made within 3 months of a complaint. Grounds for removal: misbehavior, infirmity, insolvency, paid employment outside the office. An Independent Complaints Authority at the state level inquires into complaints against Lokpal staff.
JurisdictionAll corruption cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. It covers MPs, Ministers, 'Group A' officers, 'Group A' officers in a company or body owned by the government, any officer of a government-financed society or trust or funded by Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976 or that gets funds from the public. Excludes PM, judiciary and any action of an MP in the Parliament or Committee.Offences by a public servant, including government employees, judges, MPs, Ministers, and the Prime Minister under the Indian Penal Code and the 1988 Corruption Act. Any offence committed by an MP in respect of a speech or vote in the House; wilfully giving or taking benefit from a person. Victimizing a whistleblower or witness.
InvestigationLokpal must conduct a preliminary inquiry within 30 days. If there is no prima facie case, the matter is closed. Given a prima facie case, Lokpal investigates after providing a suitable forum to the accused. The investigation must be completed within six months with an optional six-month extension after giving reasons in writing. No sanction shall be required by the Lokpal to investigate any complaint against a public servant.When investigating corruption cases, the CBI works under the Lokpal. Investigation of the Prime Minister, Ministers, MPs and judges of the Supreme Court or High Courts require the permission of a 7-member bench of the Lokpal. Investigations can last 6 to 18 months. Investigation of whistleblower complaints who are in danger of victimisation, must be completed within 3 months.
ProsecutionThe Lokpal may constitute a prosecution wing headed by a director who files cases in the Special Court (to be constituted by the central government on recommendation of the Lokpal). Trials must complete within one year, which may be extended to two years for reasons given in writing. No sanction is required to file a case against a public servant. The Lokpal files cases in the Special Court and sends a copy of the report to the competent authority.

Procedure for persons other than MPs and ministers: The competent authority is the Minister for officers of government bodies and the society head for officers of societies. The Lokpal recommends disciplinary proceedings to the competent authority and provides a copy of the report to the accused. The competent authority must take action within 30 days and inform the Lokpal within 6 months of initiating disciplinary proceedings.

Procedure for MPs and ministers: The competent authority is the PM for Ministers and the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha for MPs. The Speaker/Chairman tables the report in Parliament. The House reports to the Lokpal on any action taken within 90 days.

The CBI's prosecution wing moves under Lokpal. After an investigation is completed, the Lokpal may either initiate prosecution against the accused or impose penalty or both. The Lokpal can initiate prosecution in the Special Court formed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The Lokpal shall appoint retired judges or retired civil servants as judicial officers. A bench of judicial officers can impose a penalty on a public servant after conducting an inquiry. The decision shall be subject to approval from a higher authority to be prescribed.

Prosecution can be initiated against the Prime Minister, Ministers, MPs and judge of the Supreme Court or High Courts only with permission of a 7-member bench of the Lokpal. If the Lokpal grants permission to investigate or initiate prosecution, no sanction is required from any other authority.

PenaltyAny person making false and frivolous or vexatious complaints shall be penalised with 2 to 5 years of jail and fine of ₹25,000 to ₹200,000.For any act of corruption, the penalty shall be from six months to life imprisonment. If the beneficiary for an offence is a business entity, a fine of up to five times the loss caused to the public shall be recovered. If a company director is convicted, the company shall be blacklisted from any government contract. Convicted public servants are removed from office. Persons making a false complaint, are fined up to ₹100,000. False complaints against a member of the Lokpal may result in 3 months imprisonment.
FundingPaid by Consolidated Fund of India.Paid by Consolidated Fund of India. The budget of the Lokpal should not be less than 0.25 percent of total government revenue. No sanction required from government to incur expenditure. The CAG audits Lokpal and a Parliamentary Committee evaluates Lokpal operations.
Other powersThe Lokpal can search and seize documents, attach property for 90 days, file for confirming the attachment within 30 days, and recommend suspension of the accused.The Lokpal can receive complaints from whistle-blowers, issue search warrants, attach property, recommend cancellation/modification of a lease or license or blacklist a company. If recommendation of Lokpal is not accepted it can approach the High Court. A bench of the Lokpal can approve interception and monitoring of messages transmitted through telephone or internet.

Union Cabinet approved bill

The government moved its version of the bill [1] in the Lok Sabha on 4 August, the ninth such introduction. The bill was introduced by the Minister of State in the Prime Minister's Office, V Narayanasamy. Leader of Opposition Sushma Swaraj opposed the exclusion of the prime minister from the purview of the proposed Lokpal. V Narayanasamy told the House that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was in favour of bringing his office under the purview of the Lokpal, but the Cabinet rejected the idea after deliberation. [72] Anna Hazare burnt copies of the bill, to protest the government's lack of sincerity. [73] [74]

On 27 August the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha passed a Pranab Mukherjee-proposed resolution conveying the sense of the House on the Lokpal Bill. [75] The House agreed 'in principle' on a Citizen's Charter, placing the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal and establishing the Lokayukta in the States. [76]

The Act was finally notified by President of India on 1 January 2014, after getting approved in both Houses of Parliament and Union Cabinet, providing for setting up of a institution of Lokpal, to be headed by a Chairperson, who is or has been a Chief Justice of India, or is or has been a judge of the Supreme Court, or a person of eminence fulfilling the eligibility criteria as specified in the Act. [77] The Act also provides for the appointment of other members, which shall not exceed eight, of which 50% are to be judicial members, and among others not less than 50% of the members belong to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, OBCs, minorities, and women.

The Act provides for the appointment of a director of inquiry who shall not be below the rank of Joint Secretary to the Government of India and shall be appointed by the Central government for conducting preliminary inquiries in respect of public servants belonging to groups A, B, C or D and who are referred by the Lokpal to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). [78]

Standing Committee bill

31-member committee consisting of 25 MPs belonging to 22 political parties with 6 seats vacant [79]
Member NamePartyMember Of
Abhishek Manu SinghviCongressRajya Sabha
Chandresh KumariCongressLok Sabha
N.S.V. ChitthanCongressLok Sabha
Deepa DashmunsiCongressLok Sabha
Prabha Kishore TaviadCongressLok Sabha
Manish Tewari CongressLok Sabha
P.T. Thomas (Idukki)CongressLok Sabha
Meenakshi Natrajan CongressLok Sabha
Balavant alias Bal ApteBJPRajya Sabha
D.B. Chandre GowdaBJPLok Sabha
Harin PathakBJPLok Sabha
Jyoti DhurveBJPLok Sabha
Devji M Patel BJPLok Sabha
Parimal Nathwani IndependentRajya Sabha
Amar Singh IndependentRajya Sabha
Kirodi Lal MeenaIndependentLok Sabha
Ram Jethmalani Nominated MemberRajya Sabha
Ram Vilas Paswan LJSP Rajya Sabha
O.T. Lepcha SDF Rajya Sabha
Lalu Prasad RJD Lok Sabha
Shailendra Kumar SP Lok Sabha
Monazir Hassan JD(U) Lok Sabha
S. Semmalai AIADMK Lok Sabha
Vijay Bahadur Singh BSP Lok Sabha
R. Thamaraiselvan DMK Lok Sabha

The Jan Lokpal Bill was submitted to the committee by Congress MP from Bareilly Praveen Singh Aron. [80] The draft bill was distributed to members on 28 November. The committee recommended keeping judiciary and MPs' out of the Lokpal's purview and rejected the demand to move the prosecution wing of CBI under its jurisdiction. Committee members had unanimously recommended conferring constitutional status on the Lokpal and setting up of Lokpal and Lokayuktas in states under one bill. The draft document did not take a position on the inclusion of prime minister. Another of Team Anna's demands for inclusion of entire bureaucracy was turned down, given that the draft favoured inclusion of Group A and B officials, leaving out C and D staff. [81] [82] Anna Hazare rejected this draft. [83] [84] [85]

At the final meeting on 7 December they decided to bring Group C and D officers under the ambit of state Lokayuktas. [86] Sixteen dissent notes were submitted at the meeting by members from BJP, BJD, SP, Congress, RJD and the Left. [87]

Enactment by the Lok Sabha

The Lokpal Bill was tabled in the Lok Sabha on 22 December 2011 [88] and passed by voice voting on the first day of the three-day extended session of the Winter session of the Lok Sabha, on 27 December 2011, after a marathon debate that lasted over 10 hours. [89] The lokpal body was not given the constitutional status as the Constitutional Amendment Bill, which provided for making the Lokpal a constitutional body, was defeated in the house. The Prime Minister described this as "a bit of disappointment", adding, "We have, however, fulfilled our objective of bringing these bills to Parliament as we had promised." [90] The bill passed by the house was termed "useless" by Team Anna, who reiterated their view that there was no need to give constitutional status to such a weak Lokpal. [91]

The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha. But, it is pending in the Rajya Sabha Sansad Bhavan-2.jpg
The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha. But, it is pending in the Rajya Sabha

The government withdrew its previous version and had introduced a newer version of the bill. RJD leader Lalu Prasad, along with the support from the other parties like SP, AIMMM and LJP, demanded an inclusion of candidates from minorities in the nine member Lokpal Bench. The government gave in to the demands of parties. [92] The principal opposition party, the BJP, objected to it, classifying that such a move was illegal and asked the government to withdraw the bill. [89] [93] BJD, JDU, RJD, SP, TDP and Left said the bill was weak and wanted it to be withdrawn. [88] [94]

The bill passed by the house deleted the provision that gave presiding officers the power to act against ministers and MPs, even before trial, but the exemption time of former MPs was increased from five to seven years. [95] It excluded armed forces and coast guard from the purview of the anti-graft body. [89] The lokpal would take complaints against the prime minister after the consent of two-thirds of the Lokpal panel. The consent of state governments is mandatory for the notification to set up Lokayuktas in the states, but the setting up of them in the states was made mandatory. The appointment panel is loaded in favour of the government. The Lokpal Bill was passed under Article 252 [lower-alpha 1] of the constitution of India. The Prime Minister said, "We believe that the CBI should function without interference through any Government diktat. But no institution and no individual, howsoever high he may be, should be free from accountability." [97]

The Left, Samajwadi Party and BSP staged a walkout during voting of the bill, protesting that their demands were not being met. At least 15 Congress members and close to a dozen belonging to UPA allies were not present at the time of voting. The house also secured the passage of the Whistleblowers Bill [98] [99]

Journey through The Rajya Sabha

Winter session, 2011

Hamid Ansari, Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, adjourned the house sine die Hamid ansari.jpg
Hamid Ansari, Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, adjourned the house sine die

The ombudsman debate was taken up by The Rajya Sabha during the last day of the three-day extension of the winter session of Parliament, but the body recessed on 29 December without voting. [100] [101] The bill was debated for over 12 hours ending abruptly at midnight as the House ran out of scheduled time. The House was adjourned sine die by Chairman Hamid Ansari. A verbal duel marred proceedings as some members including UPA ally Trinamool Congress interrupted V. Narayanasamy's defence of the Bill. [102] A vociferous opposition insisted on a vote while the government maintained it needed time to reconcile the 187 amendments/ Confusion marked the proceedings. Ansari asked for the national anthem Jana Gana Mana to be played, signalling the end of the proceedings and told the house:

This is an unprecedented situation…there appears to be a desire to outshout each other. There is a total impasse. The House cannot be conducted in the noise that requires orderly proceedings, I am afraid the Chair has no option…most reluctantly…I am afraid I can't and…

After a 15-minute adjournment between 11.30 and 11.45 PM, Pawan Kumar Bansal said that the decision on extension of the House was the government's prerogative. Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley charged that the government was running away from Parliament and that the House should decide how long it should sit. He added:

You are creating an institution where you control the appointment mechanism, where you control the removal mechanism. We will support the appointment of the Lokpal procedures, but we cannot be disloyal to our commitment to create an integrity institution. [100]

Sitaram Yechury (CPI-M) said the House had expected the bill on Wednesday, but it came only on Thursday, the last day of the session. Derek O'Brien said "This is a shameful day for India's democracy. The government handled this situation very badly." [102] As the Opposition insisted on a vote, Bansal said the government was willing provided that the House passed the Bill voted by the Lok Sabha on Tuesday. This meant that the proposed amendments would have to be set aside.

As stalemate and wrangling continued, the chairman called an end to the proceedings. [103] [104] Chidambaram defended the deferment of Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill, 2011 in Rajya Sabha on 29 December contending that it was the "only prudent course" before the government and that it had ensured that the Bill remained alive. He continued to attack the BJP and called the amendments an "ingenious" method to scuttle the bill. [105] Hazare called off his hunger strike prematurely, blaming poor health. [106]

Budget session, 2012

Members of the panel proposed by the government [107]
Member NameParty
Shantaram NaikCongress
Satyavrat ChaturvediCongress
Shadi Lal BatraCongress
Arun JaitleyBJP
Rajiv Pratap RudyBJP
Bhupendra YadavBJP
KN BalagopalCPM
Shivanand TiwariJD-U
Tiruchi ShivaDMK
Satish MishraBSP
D BandyopadhyayTrinamool Congress
Ramgopal YadavSP
DP TripathiNCP
V MaitreyanAIADMK
AK GangulyNominated

Activists pushing hoped that the House would approve the bill towards the end of the second half of the budget session of 2012. The bill was re-introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 21 May 2012. [108] While moving the bill, the minister said that the differences had been narrowed. He said that the government proposed to bring the lower bureaucracy under the Lokpal, which would have investigation and prosecution powers. CVC would monitor Lokpal-referred investigations by the CBI. There would be provisions for attaching properties and a time-frame for investigations. An amendment was proposed whereby the states would pass the bill so the national law would not be forced upon states. After the amended bill was introduced, Narayanasamy, Samajwadi Party member Naresh Agrawal sought to send the bill to a select committee. This was strongly objected to by BJP, the Left parties and BSP, with their members arguing that only the minister concerned (Narayanasamy) could do so and accusing the ruling coalition of "using the shoulder" of a "friendly opposition" party. After high drama the government yielded and Narayanasamy moved the motion, which immediately passed by voice vote. The 15-member select committee was to submit its report by the first day of the last week of the Monsoon Session. [109] [110]

The committee met on 25 June and decided on "wider consultations" with the government officials and the public. [111] The panel invited public comments and called representatives of various ministries for recording evidence. [112] The meeting was headed by senior Congress MP Satyavrat Chaturvedi. [111] Law Secretary B A Agarwal was summoned to clarify various matters. [112] The committee met again on 19 July 2012. The director of the CBI aired his views in the meeting. He made it clear that the CBI is open to changes in the Lokpal bill that strengthen the agency's autonomy by enhancing the proposed Lokpal's role in key appointments like those of director, head of prosecution and lawyers who represent CBI. He also mentioned in the meeting that the Lokpal should be given a significant say in appointing the director of the prosecution wing instead of the process being controlled by the law ministry as is currently the procedure, the persistent criticism about CBI's investigations being throttled by political directives could be addressed as well. He opposed making the prosecution or the anti-corruption wings subservient to the Lokpal. The select committee had in its earlier sittings examined senior law officials who agreed with the members that the prescription for lokayuktas under Article 253 that refers to fulfilment of international obligations – in this case the UN convention against corruption – might not be feasible. Recourse to international treaties to frame a law that impact the federal structure is not within the ambit of the law. The Select committee referred the Bill for Public Suggestions in July 2012. In reply hundreds of responses were received to the Rajya Sabha. The committee took a view and shortlisted certain recommendations and took Oral Evidence in physical presence of the Members. Committee considered some of the most valid suggestions being done by the Members. Mr. Deepak Tongli of Hyderabad had come with a proposal of setting up the lower most unit to keep regular check on Anti Corruption in petty cases at District Level. In addition few other members also shared their views in this regard. Mr. Tongli, 26 yrs aged happened to be the youngest person to appear before the Parliamentary committee for Oral Evidence at Rajya Sabha. [113]

Monsoon session, 2012

The monsoon session of parliament was to be held in August 2012. Hence, a bill that is pending before the upper house whether or not it was passed by the Lok Sabha, does not lapse on its dissolution. Hence, the bill is still alive in its present form. [114] The bill was not expected to be tabled in the Rajya Sabha before the first day of the last week of the session. [115]

See also

Notes

  1. Section 252 of the Constitution of India. It is a legislation which pertains to the power of Parliament to legislate for two or more States by consent and adoption of such legislation by any other State. [96]

Further reading

Official documents pertaining to the Lokpal Bill of Government of India
Minutes of the Joint Drafting Committee (JDC) for Drafting the Lokpal Bill
Non-Official Versions of Lokpal Bill
Similar International Anti-Corruption/Bribery Laws
International Anti-Corruption/Bribery Conventions
Other useful documents

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anna Hazare</span> Indian activist (born 1937)

Kisan Baburao "Anna" Hazare is an Indian social activist who led movements to promote rural development, increase government transparency, and investigate and punish corruption in public life. In addition to organising and encouraging grassroots movements, Hazare frequently conducted hunger strikes to further his causes—a tactic reminiscent, to many, of the work of Mahatma Gandhi. Hazare also contributed to the development and structuring of Ralegan Siddhi, a village in Parner taluka of Ahmednagar district, Maharashtra, India. He was awarded the Padma Bhushan—the third-highest civilian award—by the Government of India in 1992 for his efforts in establishing this village as a model for others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">B. C. Khanduri</span> 4th Chief Minister of Uttarakhand

Major General Bhuwan Chandra Khanduri (Retd.), AVSM, is an Indian politician. He was Chief Minister of Uttarakhand from 2007 to 2009 and 2011 to 2012. He was a Member of Parliament in the 16th Lok Sabha representing the Garhwal parliamentary constituency of Uttarakhand and is a senior member of the Bharatiya Janta Party. Earlier, he was a cabinet minister, Ministry of Surface Transport of the government headed by the former Prime Minister of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shanti Bhushan</span> Indian politician and lawyer (1925–2023)

Shanti Bhushan was an Indian politician and lawyer. He served as the Law Minister of India holding office at the Ministry of Law and Justice from 1977 to 1979 in the Morarji Desai Ministry. He was a senior advocate of the Supreme Court of India. He, along with his son Prashant Bhushan, was featured at 74th position in a list of the most powerful Indians published by The Indian Express in 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lokpal</span> Ombudsman agency of India

A Lokpal is an anti-corruption authority or body of ombudsman who represents the public interest in the Republic of India. The current Chairperson of Lokpal is Pradip Kumar Mohanty. The Lokpal has jurisdiction over central government to inquire into allegations of corruption against its public functionaries and for matters connected to corruption. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act was passed in 2013 with amendments in parliament, following the Jan Lokpal movement led by Anna Hazare in 2010. The Lokpal is responsible for enquiring into corruption charges at the national level while the Lokayukta performs the same function at the state level. The age of Lokpal on the date of assuming office as the chairperson or a member should not be less than 45 years.

The Lokayukta is the Indian Parliamentary Ombudsman, executed into power, through and for, each of the State Governments of India. It is brought into effect in a state after passing the Lokayukta Act in the respective state legislature, and a person of reputable background is nominated for the post. The post was created to quickly address the working of the government or its administration. Once appointed, Lokayukta cannot be dismissed or transferred by the government, and can only be removed by passing an impeachment motion by the state assembly.

The Jan Lokpal Bill, also referred to as the Citizen's Ombudsman Bill, was a bill drawn up by civil society activists in India seeking the appointment of a Jan Lokpal, an independent body to investigate corruption cases and complete the investigation within a year for envisaging trial in the case getting completed within one year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Indian anti-corruption movement</span> Series of demonstrations and protests across India

The Indian anti-corruption movement, popularly known as Anna Andolan, was a series of demonstrations and protests across India that began in 2011 and was intended to establish strong legislation and enforcement against perceived endemic political corruption. The movement was named as one of the "Top 10 News Stories of 2011" by Time magazine.

The Citizen's Charter and Grievance Redressal Bill 2011 also known as The Right of Citizens for Time Bound Delivery of Goods and Services and Redressal of their Grievances Bill, 2011 or Citizens Charter Bill was proposed by Indian central legislation. It was tabled by V. Narayanasamy, Minister of State for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, in Lok Sabha in December 2011. The bill lapsed due to dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha.

The Goa Lokayukta is the ombudsman institution of the Indian state of Goa.The Lokayukta is an anti-corruption ombudsman existing in several states of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anjali Bhardwaj</span>

Anjali Bhardwaj is an Indian social activist working on issues of transparency and accountability. She is a co-convenor of the National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI) and a founding member of Satark Nagrik Sangathan. She works on issues related to right to information, Lokpal, whistleblower protection, grievance redress, and right to food.

The Assam Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Assam (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Assam Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayukta Act, and approved by the president of India on 2011. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act, 2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014, and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Himachal Pradesh Lokayukta acts as the parliamentary ombudsman for the state of Himachal Pradesh. It is formed as a high level statutory functionary formed by state of Himachal Pradesh under the Himachal Pradesh Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayuktas Act, 2014. The position is helpful in enhancing the standard of services in Public Administration through fast track investigations of complaints and grievances by any member of public against state ministers, legislators and other public servants. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014, and made mandatory for each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members.

The Bihar Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Bihar (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Bihar Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayukta Act, and approved by the president of India on 2011. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act, 2013 in Parliament had become law on January 16, 2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Gujarat Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Gujarat (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Gujarat Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayukta Act, and approved by the president of India on 1986. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kerala Lokayukta</span> Parliamentary ombudsman for Kerala, India

Kerala Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Kerala (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Kerala Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayukta Act, and approved by the president of India on 4th March 1999. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16,2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Odisha Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Odisha (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Odisha Lokayukta and Deputy Lokayukta Act, and approved by the president of India. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Chhattisgarh Lokayog is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Chhattisgarh (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog Act, 2002 and approved by the president of India. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act, 2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Punjab Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Indian state of Punjab. It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Punjab Lokpal Act-1996, and approved by the president of India. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16,2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Sikkim Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Sikkim (India). It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Sikkim Lokayukta and Deputy Lokayukta Act-2012 and approved by the president of India. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayukta's Act,2013 in Parliament had become law from January 16, 2014 and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. A bench of Lokayukta should consist of judicial and non-judicial members. An Upa-Lokayukta is a deputy to Lokayukta and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

Uttarakhand Lokayukta is the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the state of Uttarakhand in India. It is a high level statutory functionary, created to address grievances of the public against ministers, legislators, administration and public servants of the state, in issues related to misuse of power, mal-administration and corruption. It was first formed under the Uttarakhand Lokayukta Act, 2014 and approved by the Governor of Uttarakhand. The passage of Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 in Parliament of India had become law from January 16, 2014, and requires each state to appoint its Lokayukta within a year. and assists him in his work and acts in-charge Lokayukta in case the position fells vacant before time.

References

  1. 1 2 "THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS ACT, 2013" (PDF). Retrieved 19 December 2022.
  2. 1 2 Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice (January 2014). "The Gazette of India" (PDF). Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Department) . Retrieved 19 December 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. NDTV (2011). "The Lok Pal Bill, 2011". NDTV. Retrieved 16 June 2012.
  4. PTI (8 August 2011). "Lokpal Bill goes to Standing Committee". The Economic Times. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  5. Agencies (22 December 2011). "Lokpal Bill tabled in Parliament; Team Anna's Arvind Kejriwal rejects it". Economic Times. Articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  6. K.R. Srivats. "Business Line : Industry & Economy / Government & Policy : Lok Sabha passes Lokpal Bill but no Constitutional status". Thehindubusinessline.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  7. Kumar, Rajesh (30 December 2011). "Rajya Sabha fails to vote on Lokpal bill | Reuters". In.reuters.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  8. Business Standard (22 May 2012). "'Productive' Budget session sees several highs and lows". Business Standard. Retrieved 29 May 2012.{{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  9. "UPA pushes lokpal bill into deep freezer". Hindustan Times. 21 May 2012. Archived from the original on 25 May 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  10. 1 2 Economic Times (18 December 2013). "Lokpal Bill passed in Lok Sabha". Economic Times. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  11. "Lokpal Bill tabled in Rajya Sabha, din blocks debate". Business Standard India. 13 December 2013. Retrieved 4 October 2014.
  12. K.V. Prasad (30 December 2011). "News / National : No vote on Lokpal, Rajya Sabha adjourns abruptly". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  13. "Lokpal Bill gets President's nod - The Times of India". The Times Of India.
  14. "Notification" (PDF). Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 March 2014. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  15. "Lokpal Bill tabled in RS, sent to select committee – Politics – Politics News – ibnlive". Ibnlive.in.com. 21 May 2012. Archived from the original on 23 May 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  16. Press Trust of India (9 December 2011). "Anna, Jan Lokpal Bill top FB status updates in 2011". CNNIBN. Archived from the original on 3 February 2012. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  17. "The Top 10 Everything of 2011: Number 10 – Anna Hazare's Hunger Fasts Rock India". Time . 7 December 2011. Archived from the original on 7 January 2012. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
  18. "Anna Hazare's movement among top 10 news stories of 2011: Time magazine". The Economic Times. 8 December 2011. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
  19. Yardley, Jim; Bajaj, Vikas (27 December 2011). "Lower House of Indian Parliament Passes Anticorruption Measure". New York Times. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  20. Hari Bapuji & Suhaib Riaz (21 October 2011). "Occupy Wall Street: What Businesses Need to Know". Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review (blog). Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  21. NDTV (December 2011). "Foreign media on Lokpal Bill". NDTV. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  22. "India yoga guru Baba Ramdev to launch protest". BBC News. 4 June 2012. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  23. "Survey on Bribery and Corruption" (PDF). KPMG. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  24. "India fraud Survey Report, 2010" (PDF). KPMG. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  25. "Graft and bribe: India lost $462 billion post-independence". The Economic Times. 18 June 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  26. Langa, Mahesh (17 March 2019). "Pinaki Chandra Ghose set to be India's first Lokpal". The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  27. "Lokpal: Father Coins Name, Son Prepares Final Draft". news.outlookindia.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  28. Meenakshi (25 January 2012). "Short Essay on Jan LokPal Bill". Preserver Articles. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  29. "The Maharashtra Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayuktas Act, 1971" (PDF). General Administration Department, Government of Maharashtra. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 November 2012. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  30. "Lokayukta a 'paper tiger' in Anna's home state". The Times of India . 18 August 2011. Archived from the original on 21 October 2011. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  31. "Lokpal Bill: Over four decades of failed attempts". Ndtv.com. 15 December 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  32. "Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988" (PDF). Government of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  33. "Team Anna questions logic of RS Committee looking into Lokpal". Deccan Herald. 16 July 2012. Retrieved 16 July 2012.
  34. "Simply put: The search for a Lokpal". The Indian Express. 21 January 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2021.
  35. "Comparison of Lokpal Bill Drafts". India Policy Wiki. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  36. "Draft Lokpal Bill, 2010". Lawyersclubindia.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  37. "Lokpal Bill: Know the real difference between Government's draft and Anna Hazare's Jan Lokpal-Lokpal Bill: Know the real difference between Government's draft and Anna Hazare's Jan Lokpal| News in Pictures". Economic Times. Economictimes.indiatimes.com. 17 August 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  38. "Lokpal bill to cover PM". IBNLive. 21 November 2011. Archived from the original on 4 February 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  39. "Draft Lokpal bill disappoints, parties cagey". Deccan Herald. 31 January 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  40. "Lokpal Bill 2010 – A Farce on Public". South Asia Citizens Web. 31 October 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  41. "India activist Anna Hazare ends hunger strike". BBC News. 9 April 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  42. PTI (9 April 2011). "News / National : Govt issues notification on committee to draft Lokpal Bill". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  43. Press Information Bureau (8 April 2011). "Government issues notification to constitute a joint drafting committee to prepare draft Lok Pal Bill". New Delhi: Press Information Bureau, Government of India. p. 1. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
  44. PTI (9 April 2011). "Lokpal Bill: Text of Gazette notification". The Hindu. New Delhi. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
  45. "Minutes of the First Meeting of the Joint Drafting Committee (JDC) for drafting the Lok Pal Bill held on 16.4.2011 (Saturday) at 11:30 hrs. in Room No. 41, North Block" (PDF). Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. 16 April 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  46. "Lokpal Bill: First joint drafting committee meet today". The Times of India . PTI. 16 April 2011. Archived from the original on 1 July 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  47. "Lokpal Bill: First joint drafting panel meet ends, next on May 2". Indian Express. 16 April 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  48. "Lokpal panel has 'very good' second meeting". Zeenews.india.com. 3 March 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  49. "Lokpal Bill: Joint Drafting Committee meet for second time". Post.jagran.com. 3 May 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  50. "Minutes of the Second Meeting of the Joint Drafting Committee (JDC) for drafting the Lok Pal Bill held on 2.5.2011 (Monday) at 11:00 hrs. in Room No.41, North Block" (PDF). Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Retrieved 29 May 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  51. "India: Government ratifies two UN Conventions related to transnational organized crime and corruption". UNODC. 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  52. "India ratify UN Conventions against Transnational Organised Crime and Corruption". PIB Government of India. 13 May 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
  53. "Minutes of the Third Meeting of the Joint Drafting Committee (JDC) for drafting the Lokpal Bill held on 7.5.2011 (Saturday) at 16:30 hrs. in Room No. 41, North Block" (PDF). Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Retrieved 29 May 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  54. Anonymous (7 May 2011). "Social Work for Mankind: Lokpal Bill Draft Panel to Meet Today". Indiansocialstudy.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  55. "NCPRI – Right to Information". Righttoinformation.info. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  56. SM (8 May 2011). "3rd Meeting Lokpal Bill drafting committee details of the third meeting government and civil society members agree |From Politics To Fashion". Realityviews.blogspot.in. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  57. "Third draft of Lokpal bill by Aruna Roy seeks middle path". DNA. Dnaindia.com. 20 August 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  58. "LOKPAL BILL: Discussions at fourth meeting of Jt Committee on 23rd May 2011". Lokpalbill2011.blogspot.in. 23 May 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  59. SM (24 May 2011). "Complete details of 4th Meeting of Lokpal bill panel held on 23rd May 2011 |From Politics To Fashion". Realityviews.blogspot.in. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  60. "Minutes of the Fourth Meeting of the Joint Drafting Committee (JDC) for drafting the Lokpal Bill held on 23.5.2011 (Monday) at 11:00 hrs. in Room No.41, North Block" (PDF). Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Retrieved 29 May 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  61. "Minutes of the Fifth Meeting of the Joint Drafting Committee (JDC) for drafting the Lok Pal Bill held on 30.5.2011 (Monday) at 11:00 hrs. in Room No.41, North Block" (PDF). Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  62. "Lokpal meet: breakthrough or breakdown?". Southspy.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  63. "Lokpal meeting boycotted by drafting committee". Legalindia.in. 6 June 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  64. "Listen: Team Anna vs Cong in the Lokpal tapes – Politics – Politics News – ibnlive". Ibnlive.in.com. 14 October 2011. Archived from the original on 19 July 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  65. "Lokpal JDC – Minutes of Meeting 6". Scribd.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  66. "Fight for Lokpal Bill: Anna Hazare to fast again from Aug 16". www.daily.bhaskar.com. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  67. "No consensus on Lokpal Bill, Team Anna slams govt". The Times of India . 15 June 2011. Archived from the original on 11 September 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  68. "Opp: You kept us out, prepare draft first". Indian Express. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  69. FP Editors (15 June 2011). "Team Anna, govt agree to disagree; two draft bills now". The First Post. Retrieved 4 June 2012.{{cite magazine}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  70. "Lokpal panel meet ends without consensus". Zeenews.india.com. 16 June 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  71. "Cost of Lokpal". The Forbes, India. Retrieved 21 June 2012.
  72. "Lokpal bill moved in Lok Sabha". The Deccan Herald. 4 August 2011. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  73. "43 years, eight Lokpal bills, zero consensus". The Economic Times. Economictimes.indiatimes.com. 28 October 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2012.[ dead link ]
  74. "Bill No. 135 of 2011" (PDF). The Hindu. Chennai, India. August 2011. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  75. TNN (27 August 2011). "Anna Hazare wins, Parliament passes resolution on Lokpal Bill". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 11 September 2011. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  76. Smita Gupta (8 December 2011). "Parliamentary Standing Committee report on Lokpal Bill adopted". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  77. "Simply put: The search for a Lokpal". The Indian Express. 21 January 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  78. "Lokpal yet to get director of inquiry". The Hindu. 18 July 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
  79. The Team (23 August 2011). "Tiwari, Lalu, Amar Singh on Lokpal Standing Comm". Outlook India. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  80. Dailybhaskar.com (22 August 2011). "Standing Committee members who are examining the Lokpal Bill". Bhaskar Media. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  81. PTI (29 November 2011). "Draft of Lokpal Bill distributed to standing committee members". News Bullet. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  82. Scribd (9 December 2011). "Lokpal Bill: Standing Committee's Final Draft Report". NDTV. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  83. A Correspondent (1 December 2011). "Anna disapproves of draft of Lokpal bill". The Mid Day. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  84. Zeenews Bureau (7 December 2011). "Team Anna rejects Parl panel's Lokpal draft". Zee News. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  85. ET, Bureau (30 November 2011). "Lokpal Bill: Anna Hazare rejects the draft report, threatens agitation". The Economic Times. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  86. ET Bureau (7 December 2011). "Standing committee to bring Group C and D officers under state Lokayuktas; silent on central govt employees". The economic Times. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  87. PTI (4 June 2012). "Patch up by Team Anna, to join Ramdev protest". Express Buzz, The Indian Express. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  88. 1 2 TNN (22 December 2011). "Government tables Lokpal bill in Lok Sabha". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 2 January 2014. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  89. 1 2 3 Agencies (27 December 2011). "Lok Sabha passes Lokpal Bill". The Indian Express. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  90. NDTV Correspondent (27 December 2011). "Lokpal will not be a constitutional body". NDTV. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  91. IANS (28 December 2011). "Team Anna rubbishes 'weak' Lokpal passed in Lok Sabha". The Times of India. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  92. NDTV Correspondent (22 December 2011). "Lokpal minority quota: Govt accepts Lalu's demand". NDTV. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  93. IBN Live (22 December 2011). "Lokpal Bill tabled in Lok Sabha, BJP opposes minority quota". CNNIBN. Archived from the original on 7 January 2012. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  94. NDTV Correspondent (22 December 2011). "Lokpal Bill tabled in Lok Sabha". NDTV. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  95. ET Bureau (28 December 2011). "Lokpal bill finally passed in Lok Sabha after many failures". The Economic Times. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  96. Constitution of India- Article 252, p. 154,155.
  97. Sandeep Phukan & Sunil Prabhu (28 December 2011). "Lokpal Bill passed in Lok Sabha, but no constitutional status". NDTV. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  98. "Lok Sabha passes Lokpal bill with changes, but without constitutional status". The Times of India . 28 December 2011. Archived from the original on 2 January 2014. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  99. CNNIBN Online (28 December 2011). "Lok Sabha passes Lokpal Bill, UPA gets a red face; Left, SP, BSP walk out". CNNIBN. Archived from the original on 7 January 2012. Retrieved 5 June 2012.{{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  100. 1 2 Harmeet Shah Singh and Moni Basu, CNN (29 December 2011). "Time runs out on India's anti-graft bill". Cable News Network. Retrieved 3 June 2012.{{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  101. "Lokpal Bill's passage through Rajya Sabha remains uncertain". Sify . 20 May 2012. Archived from the original on 20 May 2012. Retrieved 3 June 2012.
  102. 1 2 Andrew MacAskill & Bibhudatta Pradhan (30 December 2011). "Singh Caps 'Annus Horribilis' With Anti-Graft Law Stymied by Upper House". Bloomberg. Retrieved 3 June 2012.
  103. K. V. Prasad (30 December 2011). "No vote on Lokpal, Rajya Sabha adjourns abruptly". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 3 June 2012.
  104. Rajesh Kumar Singh (30 December 2011). "Rajya Sabha fails to vote on Lokpal bill". Reuters. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  105. "Opposition blocked the Lokpal Bill in Rajya Sabha: Chidambaram". India Today. 31 December 2011. Retrieved 5 June 2012.
  106. Yardley, Jim (29 December 2011). "Bill to Create Anticorruption Agency Stalls in India". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  107. HT Correspondent, Hindustan Times (21 May 2012). "UPA pushes lokpal bill into deep freezer". The Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 22 May 2012. Retrieved 3 June 2012.
  108. PTI (21 May 2012). "Lokpal Bill tabled in Rajya Sabha". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 20 December 2013. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  109. PTI (21 May 2012). "Lokpal Bill tabled in Rajya Sabha, referred to select committee". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 27 May 2013. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  110. NDTV Correspondent (21 May 2012). "Government sends Lokpal Bill to House panel; BJP protests". NDTV. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  111. 1 2 "Rajya Sabha panel for wider consultation on Lokpal". Hindu Business Line. 26 June 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  112. 1 2 "New panel scrutinising Lokpal Bill to call Law Secretary". DNA India. 25 June 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  113. "CBI links changes in Lokpal Bill to more autonomy". The Times of India . 20 July 2012. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013.
  114. "Second Chambers of Parliament of India- The Rajya Sabha" (PDF). The Rajya Sabha, Parliament of India. 2009. Retrieved 10 June 2012.
  115. "Lokpal bill delayed, goes to another panel". The Times of India . 22 May 2012. Archived from the original on 3 January 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2012.