Battle of the Chesapeake

Last updated

Battle of the Chesapeake
Part of the American War of Independence and Siege of Yorktown (1781)
BattleOfVirginiaCapes.jpg
The French line (left) and British line (right) do battle
Date5 September 1781
Location 36°58′3″N75°32′21″W / 36.96750°N 75.53917°W / 36.96750; -75.53917 (Battle of the Chesapeake)
Result French victory [1]
Belligerents
Royal Standard of the King of France.svg  France Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg  Great Britain
Commanders and leaders
Flag of the Kingdom of France (1814-1830).svg Comte de Grasse Naval Ensign of Great Britain (1707-1800).svg Thomas Graves  (WIA)
Strength
24 ships of the line with 1,542 guns [2] 19 ships of the line with 1,410 guns [3]
Casualties and losses
220 killed or wounded
2 ships damaged [4]
90 killed
246 wounded
5 ships damaged
1 ship scuttled [4] [5]

The Battle of the Chesapeake, also known as the Battle of the Virginia Capes or simply the Battle of the Capes, was a crucial naval battle in the American Revolutionary War that took place near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay on 5 September 1781. The combatants were a British fleet led by Rear Admiral Sir Thomas Graves and a French fleet led by Rear Admiral François Joseph Paul, the Comte de Grasse. The battle was strategically decisive, [1] in that it prevented the Royal Navy from reinforcing or evacuating the besieged forces of Lieutenant General Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown, Virginia. The French were able to achieve control of the sea lanes against the British and provided the Franco-American army with siege artillery and French reinforcements. These proved decisive in the Siege of Yorktown, effectively securing independence for the Thirteen Colonies.

Contents

Admiral de Grasse had the option to attack British forces in either New York or Virginia; he opted for Virginia, arriving at the Chesapeake at the end of August. Admiral Graves learned that de Grasse had sailed from the West Indies for North America and that French Admiral de Barras had also sailed from Newport, Rhode Island. He concluded that they were going to join forces at the Chesapeake. He sailed south from Sandy Hook, New Jersey, outside New York Harbor, with 19 ships of the line and arrived at the mouth of the Chesapeake early on 5 September to see de Grasse's fleet already at anchor in the bay. De Grasse hastily prepared most of his fleet for battle—24 ships of the line—and sailed out to meet him. The two-hour engagement took place after hours of maneuvering. The lines of the two fleets did not completely meet; only the forward and center sections fully engaged. The battle was consequently fairly evenly matched, although the British suffered more casualties and ship damage, and it broke off when the sun set. The British tactics have been a subject of debate ever since.

The two fleets sailed within view of each other for several days, but de Grasse preferred to lure the British away from the bay where de Barras was expected to arrive carrying vital siege equipment. He broke away from the British on 13 September and returned to the Chesapeake, where de Barras had since arrived. Graves returned to New York to organize a larger relief effort; this did not sail until 19 October, two days after Cornwallis surrendered.

[The] Battle of the Chesapeake was a tactical victory for the French by no clearcut margin, but it was a strategic victory for the French and Americans that sealed the principal outcome of the war.

Background

During the early months of 1781, both pro-British and rebel separatist forces began concentrating in Virginia, a state that had previously not had action other than naval raids. The British forces were led at first by the turncoat Benedict Arnold, and then by William Phillips before General Charles, Earl Cornwallis, arrived in late May with his southern army to take command.

In June, Cornwallis marched to Williamsburg, where he received a confusing series of orders from General Sir Henry Clinton that culminated in a directive to establish a fortified deep-water port (which would allow resupply by sea). [7] In response to these orders, Cornwallis moved to Yorktown in late July, where his army began building fortifications. [8] The presence of these British troops, coupled with General Clinton's desire for a port there, made control of the Chesapeake Bay an essential naval objective for both sides. [9] [10]

On 21 May, Generals George Washington and Rochambeau, respectively the commanders of the Continental Army and the Expédition Particulière, met at the Vernon House in Newport, Rhode Island to discuss potential operations against the British and Loyalists. They considered either an assault or siege on the principal British base at New York City, or operations against the British forces in Virginia. Since either of these options would require the assistance of the French fleet, then in the West Indies, a ship was dispatched to meet with French Lieutenant général de Grasse who was expected at Cap-Français (now known as Cap-Haïtien, Haiti), outlining the possibilities and requesting his assistance. [11] Rochambeau, in a private note to de Grasse, indicated that his preference was for an operation against Virginia. The two generals then moved their forces to White Plains, New York, to study New York's defenses and await news from de Grasse. [12]

Arrival of the fleets

De Grasse arrived at Cap-Français on 15 August. He immediately dispatched his response to Rochambeau's note, which was that he would make for the Chesapeake. Taking on 3,200 troops, De Grasse sailed from Cap-Français with his entire fleet, 28 ships of the line. Sailing outside the normal shipping lanes to avoid notice, he arrived at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay on August 30, [12] and disembarked the troops to assist in the land blockade of Cornwallis. [13] Two British frigates that were supposed to be on patrol outside the bay were trapped inside the bay by De Grasse's arrival; this prevented the British in New York from learning the full strength of de Grasse's fleet until it was too late. [14]

British Admiral George Brydges Rodney, who had been tracking De Grasse around the West Indies, was alerted to the latter's departure, but was uncertain of the French admiral's destination. Believing that de Grasse would return a portion of his fleet to Europe, Rodney detached Rear Admiral Sir Samuel Hood with 14 ships of the line and orders to find de Grasse's destination in North America. Rodney, who was ill, sailed for Europe with the rest of his fleet in order to recover, refit his fleet, and to avoid the Atlantic hurricane season. [3]

Sailing more directly than de Grasse, Hood's fleet arrived off the entrance to the Chesapeake on 25 August. Finding no French ships there, he then sailed for New York. [3] Meanwhile, his colleague and commander of the New York fleet, Rear Admiral Sir Thomas Graves, had spent several weeks trying to intercept a convoy organized by John Laurens to bring much-needed supplies and hard currency from France to Boston. [15] When Hood arrived at New York, he found that Graves was in port (having failed to intercept the convoy), but had only five ships of the line that were ready for battle. [3]

De Grasse had notified his counterpart in Newport, Barras, of his intentions and his planned arrival date. Barras sailed from Newport on 27 August with 8 ships of the line, 4 frigates, and 18 transports carrying French armaments and siege equipment. He deliberately sailed via a circuitous route in order to minimize the possibility of a battle with the British, should they sail from New York in pursuit. Washington and Rochambeau, in the meantime, had crossed the Hudson on 24 August, leaving some troops behind as a ruse to delay any potential move on the part of General Clinton to mobilize assistance for Cornwallis. [3]

News of Barras' departure led the British to realize that the Chesapeake was the probable target of the French fleets. By 31 August, Graves had moved his five ships of the line out of New York Harbor to meet with Hood's force. Taking command of the combined fleet, now 19 ships, Graves sailed south, and arrived at the mouth of the Chesapeake on 5 September. [3] His progress was slow; the poor condition of some of the West Indies ships (contrary to claims by Admiral Hood that his fleet was fit for a month of service) necessitated repairs en route. Graves was also concerned about some ships in his own fleet; Europe in particular had difficulty manoeuvring. [16]

Battle lines form

French and British patrol frigates each spotted the other's fleet around 9:30 am; both at first underestimated the size of the other fleet, leading each commander to believe the other fleet was the smaller fleet of Admiral de Barras. When the true size of the fleets became apparent, Graves assumed that de Grasse and Barras had already joined forces, and prepared for battle; he directed his line toward the bay's mouth, assisted by winds from the north-northeast. [2] [17]

De Grasse had detached a few of his ships to blockade the York and James Rivers farther up the bay, and many of the ships at anchor were missing officers, men, and boats when the British fleet was sighted. [2] He faced the difficult proposition of organizing a line of battle while sailing against an incoming tide, with winds and land features that would require him to do so on a tack opposite that of the British fleet. [18] At 11:30 am, 24 ships of the French fleet cut their anchor lines and began sailing out of the bay with the noon tide, leaving behind the shore contingents and ships' boats. [2] Some ships were so seriously undermanned, missing as many as 200 men, that not all of their guns could be manned. [19] De Grasse had ordered the ships to form into a line as they exited the bay, in order of speed and without regard to its normal sailing order. [20] Admiral Louis de Bougainville's Auguste was one of the first ships out. With a squadron of three other ships Bougainville ended up well ahead of the rest of the French line; by 3:45 pm the gap was large enough that the British could have cut his squadron off from the rest of the French fleet. [21]

Formation of fleets: British ships are black, French ships are white. The Middle Ground to the left are the shoals that Graves tacked to avoid. Battle of Virginia Capes diagram.png
Formation of fleets: British ships are black, French ships are white. The Middle Ground to the left are the shoals that Graves tacked to avoid.

By 1:00 pm, the two fleets were roughly facing each other, but sailing on opposite tacks. [22] In order to engage, and to avoid some shoals (known as the Middle Ground) near the mouth of the bay, Graves around 2:00 pm ordered his whole fleet to wear, a manoeuvre that reversed his line of battle, but enabled it to line up with the French fleet as its ships exited the bay. [23] This placed the squadron of Hood, his most aggressive commander, at the rear of the line, and that of Admiral Francis Samuel Drake in the vanguard. [22] [24]

At this point, both fleets were sailing generally east, away from the bay, with winds from the north-northeast. [2] The two lines were approaching at an angle so that the leading ships of the vans of both lines were within range of each other, while the ships at the rear were too far apart to engage. The French had a firing advantage, since the wind conditions meant they could open their lower gun ports, while the British had to leave theirs closed to avoid water washing onto the lower decks. The French fleet, which was in a better state of repair than the British fleet, outnumbered the British in the number of ships and total guns, and had heavier guns capable of throwing more weight. [22] In the British fleet, Ajax and Terrible, two ships of the West Indies squadron that were among the most heavily engaged, were in quite poor condition. [25] Graves at this point did not press the potential advantage of the separated French van; as the French centre and rear closed the distance with the British line, they also closed the distance with their own van. One British observer wrote, "To the astonishment of the whole fleet, the French center were permitted without molestation to bear down to support their van." [26]

The need for the two lines to actually reach parallel lines so they might fully engage led Graves to give conflicting signals that were interpreted critically differently by Admiral Hood, directing the rear squadron, than Graves intended. None of the options for closing the angle between the lines presented a favourable option to the British commander: any manoeuvre to bring ships closer would limit their firing ability to their bow guns, and potentially expose their decks to raking or enfilading fire from the enemy ships. Graves hoisted two signals: one for "line ahead", under which the ships would slowly close the gap and then straighten the line when parallel to the enemy, and one for "close action", which normally indicated that ships should turn to directly approach the enemy line, turning when the appropriate distance was reached. This combination of signals resulted in the piecemeal arrival of his ships into the range of battle. [27] Admiral Hood interpreted the instruction to maintain line of battle to take precedence over the signal for close action, and as a consequence his squadron did not close rapidly and never became significantly engaged in the action. [28]

Battle

It was about 4:00 pm, over 6 hours since the two fleets had first sighted each other, when the British—who had the weather gage, and therefore the initiative—opened their attack. [22] The battle began with HMS Intrepid opening fire against the Marseillois, its counterpart near the head of the line. The action very quickly became general, with the van and center of each line fully engaged. [22] The French, in a practice they were known for, tended to aim at British masts and rigging, with the intent of crippling their opponent's mobility. The effects of this tactic were apparent in the engagement: Shrewsbury and HMS Intrepid, at the head of the British line, became virtually impossible to manage, and eventually fell out of the line. [29] The rest of Admiral Drake's squadron also suffered heavy damage, but the casualties were not as severe as those taken on the first two ships. The angle of approach of the British line also played a role in the damage they sustained; ships in their van were exposed to raking fire when only their bow guns could be brought to bear on the French. [30]

The French van also took a beating, although it was less severe. Captain de Boades of the Réfléchi was killed in the opening broadside of Admiral Drake's Princessa, and the four ships of the French van were, according to a French observer, "engaged with seven or eight vessels at close quarters." [30] The Diadème, according to a French officer "was utterly unable to keep up the battle, having only four thirty-six-pounders and nine eighteen-pounders fit for use" and was badly shot up; she was rescued by the timely intervention of the Saint-Esprit. [30]

The Princessa and Bougainville's Auguste at one point were close enough that the French admiral considered a boarding action; Drake managed to pull away, but this gave Bougainville the chance to target the Terrible. Her foremast, already in bad shape before the battle, was struck by several French cannonballs, and her pumps, already overtaxed in an attempt to keep her afloat, were badly damaged by shots "between wind and water". [31]

Around 5:00 pm the wind began to shift, to British disadvantage. De Grasse gave signals for the van to move further ahead so that more of the French fleet might engage, but Bougainville, fully engaged with the British van at musket range, did not want to risk "severe handling had the French presented the stern." [32] When he did finally begin pulling away, British leaders interpreted it as a retreat: "the French van suffered most, because it was obliged to bear away." [33] Rather than follow, the British hung back, continuing to fire at long range; this prompted one French officer to write that the British "only engaged from far off and simply in order to be able to say that they had fought." [33] Sunset brought an end to the firefight, with both fleets continuing on a roughly southeast tack, away from the bay. [34]

The center of both lines was engaged, but the level of damage and casualties suffered was noticeably less. Ships in the rear squadrons were almost entirely uninvolved; Admiral Hood reported that three of his ships fired a few shots. [35] The ongoing conflicting signals left by Graves, and discrepancies between his and Hood's records of what signals had been given and when, led to immediate recriminations, written debate, and an eventual formal inquiry. [36]

Standoff

That evening, Graves did a damage assessment. He noted that "the French had not the appearance of near so much damage as we had sustained", and that five of his fleet were either leaking or virtually crippled in their mobility. [34] De Grasse wrote that "we perceived by the sailing of the English that they had suffered greatly." [37] Nonetheless, Graves maintained a windward position through the night, so that he would have the choice of battle in the morning. [37] Ongoing repairs made it clear to Graves that he would be unable to attack the next day. On the night of 6 September he held council with Hood and Drake. During this meeting Hood and Graves supposedly exchanged words concerning the conflicting signals, and Hood proposed turning the fleet around to make for the Chesapeake. Graves rejected the plan, and the fleets continued to drift eastward, away from Cornwallis. [38] On 8 and 9 September the French fleet at times gained the advantage of the wind, and briefly threatened the British with renewed action. [39] French scouts spied Barras' fleet on 9 September, and de Grasse turned his fleet back toward the Chesapeake Bay that night. Arriving on 12 September, he found that Barras had arrived two days earlier. [40] Graves ordered the Terrible to be scuttled on 11 September due to her leaky condition, and was notified on 13 September that the French fleet was back in the Chesapeake; he still did not learn that de Grasse's line had not included the fleet of Barras, because the frigate captain making the report had not counted the ships. [41] In a council held that day, the British admirals decided against attacking the French, due to "the truly lamentable state we have brought ourself." [42] Graves then turned his battered fleet toward New York, [43] [44] arriving off Sandy Hook on 20 September. [43]

Aftermath

The surrender of Lord Cornwallis, October 19, 1781, at Yorktown Reddition de Cornwalis 1781 french engraving 1784 avec texte.jpg
The surrender of Lord Cornwallis, October 19, 1781, at Yorktown

The British fleet's arrival in New York set off a flurry of panic amongst the Loyalist population. [45] The news of the defeat was also not received well in London. King George III wrote (well before learning of Cornwallis's surrender) that "after the knowledge of the defeat of our fleet [...] I nearly think the empire ruined." [46]

The French success left them firmly in control of the Chesapeake Bay, completing the encirclement of Cornwallis. [47] In addition to capturing a number of smaller British vessels, de Grasse and Barras assigned their smaller vessels to assist in the transport of Washington's and Rochambeau's forces from Head of Elk to Yorktown. [48]

It was not until 23 September that Graves and Clinton learned that the French fleet in the Chesapeake numbered 36 ships. This news came from a dispatch sneaked out by Cornwallis on 17 September, accompanied by a plea for help: "If you cannot relieve me very soon, you must be prepared to hear the worst." [49] After effecting repairs in New York, Admiral Graves sailed from New York on 19 October with 25 ships of the line and transports carrying 7,000 troops to relieve Cornwallis. [50] It was two days after Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown. [51] General Washington acknowledged to de Grasse the importance of his role in the victory: "You will have observed that, whatever efforts are made by the land armies, the navy must have the casting vote in the present contest." [52] The eventual surrender of Cornwallis led to peace two years later and British recognition of a new, independent United States of America. [51]

Admiral de Grasse returned with his fleet to the West Indies. In a major engagement that ended Franco-Spanish plans for the capture of Jamaica in 1782, he was defeated and taken prisoner by Rodney in the Battle of the Saintes. [53] His flagship Ville de Paris was lost at sea in a storm while being conducted back to England as part of a fleet commanded by Admiral Graves. Graves, despite the controversy over his conduct in this battle, continued to serve, rising to full admiral and receiving an Irish peerage. [54]

Analysis

Many aspects of the battle have been the subject of both contemporary and historical debate, beginning right after the battle. On 6 September, Admiral Graves issued a memorandum justifying his use of the conflicting signals, indicating that "[when] the signal for the line of battle ahead is out at the same time with the signal for battle, it is not to be understood that the latter signal shall be rendered ineffectual by a too strict adherence to the former." [55] Hood, in commentary written on the reverse of his copy, observed that this eliminated any possibility of engaging an enemy who was disordered, since it would require the British line to also be disordered. Instead, he maintained, "the British fleet should be as compact as possible, in order to take the critical moment of an advantage opening ..." [55] Others criticise Hood because he "did not wholeheartedly aid his chief", and that a lesser officer "would have been court-martialled for not doing his utmost to engage the enemy." [56]

One contemporary writer critical of the scuttling of the Terrible wrote that "she made no more water than she did before [the battle]", and, more acidly, "If an able officer had been at the head of the fleet, the Terrible would not have been destroyed." [42] Admiral Rodney was critical of Graves' tactics, writing, "by contracting his own line he might have brought his nineteen against the enemy's fourteen or fifteen, [...] disabled them before they could have received succor, [... and] gained a complete victory." [46] Defending his own behaviour in not sending his full fleet to North America, he also wrote that "[i]f the admiral in America had met Sir Samuel Hood near the Chesapeake", that Cornwallis's surrender might have been prevented. [57]

United States Navy historian Frank Chadwick believed that de Grasse could have thwarted the British fleet simply by staying put; his fleet's size would have been sufficient to impede any attempt by Graves to force a passage through his position. Historian Harold Larrabee points out that this would have exposed Clinton in New York to blockade by the French if Graves had successfully entered the bay; if Graves did not do so, Barras (carrying the siege equipment) would have been outnumbered by Graves if de Grasse did not sail out in support. [58]

According to scientist/historian Eric Jay Dolin, the dreaded hurricane season of 1780 in the Caribbean (a year earlier) may have also played a crucial role in the outcome of the 1781 naval battle. The Great Hurricane of 1780 in October was perhaps the deadliest Atlantic hurricane on record. An estimated 22,000 people died throughout the Lesser Antilles with the loss of countless ships from many nations. The Royal Navy's loss of 15 warships with 9 severely damaged crucially affected the balance of the American Revolutionary War, especially during Battle of Chesapeake Bay. An outnumbered British Navy losing to the French proved decisive in Washington's Siege of Yorktown, forcing Cornwallis to surrender and effectively securing independence for the United States of America. [59]

Memorial

At the Cape Henry Memorial located at Joint Expeditionary Base Fort Story in Virginia Beach, Virginia, there is a monument commemorating the contribution of de Grasse and his sailors to the cause of American independence. The memorial and monument are part of the Colonial National Historical Park and are maintained by the National Park Service. [60]

Order of battle

British line

British fleet
Ship Rate Guns Commander CasualtiesNotes
Killed Wounded Total
Van (rear during the battle)
Alfred Third rate 74Captain William Bayne 000
Belliqueux Third rate 64Captain James Brine 000
Invincible Third rate 74Captain Charles Saxton 000
Barfleur Second rate 98Rear Admiral Samuel Hood
Captain Alexander Hood
000
Monarch Third rate 74Captain Francis Reynolds 000
Centaur Third rate 74Captain John Nicholson Inglefield 000
Centre
America Third rate 64Captain Samuel Thompson 000
Bedford Third rate 74Captain Thomas Graves 000
Resolution Third rate 74Captain Lord Robert Manners 31619
London Second rate 98Rear Admiral Thomas Graves
Captain David Graves
41822Fleet flag
Royal Oak Third rate 74Captain John Plumer Ardesoif459
Montagu Third rate 74Captain George Bowen 82230
Europe Third rate 64Captain Smith Child 91827
Rear (van during the battle)
Terrible Third rate 74Captain William Clement Finch 421 [61] 25Scuttled after the battle
Ajax Third rate 74Captain Nicholas Charrington71623
Princessa Third rate 70Rear Admiral Francis Samuel Drake
Captain Charles Knatchbull
61117Rear flag
Alcide Third rate 74Captain Charles Thompson 21820
Intrepid Third rate 64Captain Anthony James Pye Molloy 213556
Shrewsbury Third rate 74Captain Mark Robinson 145266
Casualty summary82232314
Unless otherwise cited, table information is from The Magazine of American History With Notes and Queries, Volume 7, p. 370. The names of the ship captains are from Allen, p. 321.

French line

Sources consulted (including de Grasse's memoir, and works either dedicated to the battle or containing otherwise detailed orders of battle, like Larrabee (1964) and Morrissey (1997)) do not list per-ship casualties for the French fleet. Larrabee reports the French to have suffered 209 casualties; [37] Bougainville recorded 10 killed and 58 wounded aboard Auguste alone. [31]

The exact order in which the French lined up as they exited the bay is also uncertain. Larrabee notes that many observers wrote up different sequences when the line was finally formed, and that Bougainville recorded several different configurations. [23]

Admiral de Grasse's fleet [62]
DivisionShipTypeCommanderCasualtiesNotes
KilledWoundedTotal
Escadre blanche et bleue (vanguard)
Pluton 74 Captain Albert de Rions [63]
Marseillois 74 Captain Castellane-Masjastre [64] First officer Champmartin wounded. [65] [66]
Bourgogne 74 Captain Charritte [67]
Diadème 74 Captain de Monteclerc  ( WIA ) [68] [69] [66] [70]
Réfléchi 64 Captain Cillart de Surville [62]
Auguste 80 Captain Castellan (flag captain) [71] 105868 [31] Van flag, Chef d'Escadre Bougainville
Saint-Esprit 80 Captain Chabert-Cogolin [67]  ( WIA ) [66] [69]
Caton 64 Captain Framond  ( WIA ) [66] [69]
Escadre blanche (centre)
César 74 Brigadier Coriolis d'Espinouse [72]
Destin 74 Captain Dumaitz de Goimpy [73]
Ville de Paris 104 Grasse (Lieutenant général)
Vaugiraud de Rosnay (Major general)
Cresp de Saint-Césaire (flag captain) [74]
Division, Squadron and Fleet flagship
Victoire 74 Captain Albert de Saint-Hippolyte
Sceptre 74 Captain Rigaud de Vaudreuil [75]
Northumberland 74 Captain Bricqueville [76]
Palmier 74 Captain Arros d'Argelos [73]
Solitaire 64 Captain Champion de Cicé
Citoyen 74 Captain d'Ethy
Escadre bleue (Rear)
Scipion 74 Captain de Clavel [77]
Magnanime 74 Captain Le Bègue de Germiny [78]
Hercule 74 Captain Turpin du Breuil [79]
Languedoc 80 Captain Parscau du Plessix [80] Rear flag, Chef d'Escadre de Monteil [75]
Zélé 74 Captain de Gras-Préville [81]
Hector 74 Captain Renaud d'Aleins [71]
Souverain 74 Captain Glandevès du Castellet [63]
Reconnaissance and Signals
Signals and reconnaissance Railleuse FrigateCaptain Sainte-Eulalie [82]
Aigrette Frigate Traversay

The 74-gun Glorieux and Vaillant, as well the other frigates, remained at the mouth of the various rivers that they were guarding. [62]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Yorktown</span> 1781 American Revolutionary War battle

The siege of Yorktown, also known as the Battle of Yorktown and the surrender at Yorktown, began September 28, 1781, and ended on October 19, 1781, at exactly 10:30 am in Yorktown, Virginia. It was a decisive victory by a combined force of the American Continental Army troops led by General George Washington with support from the Marquis de Lafayette and French Army troops led by the Comte de Rochambeau and a French naval force commanded by the Comte de Grasse over the British Army commanded by British Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Rodney, 1st Baron Rodney</span> British naval officer (1718–1792)

Admiral George Brydges Rodney, 1st Baron Rodney, KB, was a British naval officer. He is best known for his commands in the American War of Independence, particularly his victory over the French at the Battle of the Saintes in 1782. It is often claimed that he was the commander to have pioneered the tactic of breaking the line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">François Joseph Paul de Grasse</span> French Navy officer and nobleman

François Joseph Paul, Comte de Grasse, Marquis of Grasse-Tilly, SMOM was a French Navy officer and nobleman. He is best known for his command of the French fleet at the Battle of the Chesapeake in 1781 in the last year of the American Revolutionary War. It directly led to the Franco-American victory at the siege of Yorktown and helped secure the independence of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of the Saintes</span> Naval Battle of American Revolutionary War (1782)

The Battle of the Saintes, also known as the Battle of Dominica, was an important naval battle in the Caribbean between the British and the French that took place 9–12 April 1782. The British victory was considered their greatest over the French during the American Revolutionary War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Graves, 1st Baron Graves</span> Royal Navy admiral (1725–1802)

Admiral Thomas Graves, 1st Baron Graves, KB was a British officer of the Royal Navy and a colonial official. He served in the Seven Years' War and the American War of Independence. He was also the Commodore-Governor of Newfoundland for a period of time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Naval battles of the American Revolutionary War</span> American Revolutionary War battles involving British, French, and U.S. navies

The American Revolutionary War saw a series of battles involving naval forces of the British Royal Navy and the Continental Navy from 1775, and of the French Navy from 1778 onwards. Although the British enjoyed more numerical victories, these battles culminated in the surrender of the British Army force of Lieutenant-General Earl Charles Cornwallis, an event that led directly to the beginning of serious peace negotiations and the eventual end of the war. From the start of the hostilities, the British North American station under Vice-Admiral Samuel Graves blockaded the major colonial ports and carried raids against patriot communities. Colonial forces could do little to stop these developments due to British naval supremacy. In 1777, colonial privateers made raids into British waters capturing merchant ships, which they took into French and Spanish ports, although both were officially neutral. Seeking to challenge Britain, France signed two treaties with America in February 1778, but stopped short of declaring war on Britain. The risk of a French invasion forced the British to concentrate its forces in the English Channel, leaving its forces in North America vulnerable to attacks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Saint Kitts</span> 1782 naval battle during the American Revolutionary War

The Battle of Saint Kitts, also known as the Battle of Frigate Bay, was a naval battle fought on 25 and 26 January 1782 during the American Revolutionary War between a British fleet under Rear Admiral Sir Samuel Hood and a larger French fleet under the Comte de Grasse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Cornwallis</span> Royal Navy admiral (1744–1819)

Admiral Sir William Cornwallis, was a Royal Navy officer. He was the brother of Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis, British commander at the siege of Yorktown. Cornwallis took part in a number of decisive battles including the siege of Louisbourg in 1758, when he was 14, and the Battle of the Saintes but is best known as a friend of Lord Nelson and as the commander-in-chief of the Channel Fleet during the Napoleonic Wars. He is depicted in the Horatio Hornblower novel, Hornblower and the Hotspur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cape Henry</span> Headland on the Atlantic shore of Virginia

Cape Henry is a cape on the Atlantic shore of Virginia located in the northeast corner of Virginia Beach. It is the southern boundary of the entrance to the long estuary of the Chesapeake Bay.

French ship <i>Ville de Paris</i> (1764) Ship of the line of the French Navy

Ville de Paris was a large three-decker French ship of the line that became famous as the flagship of Admiral De Grasse during the American Revolutionary War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Fort Royal</span> Part of the Anglo-French War (1781)

The Battle of Fort Royal was a naval battle fought off Fort Royal, Martinique in the West Indies during the Anglo-French War on 29 April 1781, between fleets of the British Royal Navy and the French Navy. After an engagement lasting four hours, the British squadron under Admiral Samuel Hood broke off and retreated. Admiral de Grasse offered a desultory chase before seeing the French convoys safe to port.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yorktown campaign</span> 1781 military campaign of the American Revolutionary War

The Yorktown campaign, also known as the Virginia campaign, was a series of military maneuvers and battles during the American Revolutionary War that culminated in the siege of Yorktown in October 1781. The result of the campaign was the surrender of the British Army force of General Charles Earl Cornwallis, an event that led directly to the beginning of serious peace negotiations and the eventual end of the war. The campaign was marked by disagreements, indecision, and miscommunication on the part of British leaders, and by a remarkable set of cooperative decisions, at times in violation of orders, by the French and Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Cape Henry</span> 1781 naval battle of the American Revolutionary War

The Battle of Cape Henry was a naval battle in the American War of Independence which took place near the mouth of Chesapeake Bay on 16 March 1781 between a British squadron led by Vice Admiral Mariot Arbuthnot and a French fleet under Admiral Charles René Dominique Sochet, Chevalier Destouches. Destouches, based in Newport, Rhode Island, had sailed for the Chesapeake as part of a joint operation with the Continental Army to oppose the British army of Brigadier General Benedict Arnold that was active in Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yorktown order of battle</span>

The siege of Yorktown was the culminating act of the Yorktown campaign, a series of military operations occupying much of 1781 during the American Revolutionary War. The siege was a decisive Franco-American victory: after the surrender of British Lt. Gen. Charles, Earl Cornwallis on October 17, the government of Lord North fell, and its replacement entered into peace negotiations that resulted in British recognition of American independence with the 1783 Treaty of Paris.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louis-Philippe de Rigaud, Marquis de Vaudreuil</span>

Louis-Philippe de Rigaud, Marquis de Vaudreuil was second in command of the French squadron off America during the American Revolutionary War.

<i>Expédition Particulière</i> 1780–82 French expedition of the American Revolutionary War

The Special Expedition was an expeditionary force deployed by France to North America to support the Thirteen Colonies against Great Britain in the American Revolutionary War. Arriving on 11 July 1780 under the leadership of the Comte de Rochambeau, it numbered up to 5,500 troops and played a decisive role in the final battles of the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Invasion of Tobago</span> French invasion of the British-held island of Tobago in 1781

The Invasion of Tobago was a French invasion of the British-held island of Tobago during the Anglo-French War. On 24 May 1781, the fleet of Comte de Grasse landed troops on the island under the command of General Marquis de Bouillé. By 2 June 1781, they had successfully gained control of the island.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capture of Sint Eustatius</span> Part of the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War (1781)

The Capture of Sint Eustatius took place in February 1781 during the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War when British army and naval forces under Lieutenant-General Sir John Vaughan and Admiral George Rodney seized the Dutch-owned Caribbean island of Sint Eustatius. The capture was controversial in Britain, as it was alleged that Vaughan and Rodney had used the opportunity to enrich themselves and had neglected more important military duties. The island was subsequently taken by Dutch-allied French forces in late 1781, ending the British occupation.

Jacques-Melchior Saint-Laurent, Comte de Barras was a French Navy officer of the eighteenth century. He notably served in Yorktown Campaign of the War of American Independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anglo-French War (1778–1783)</span> Military conflict fought France and Great Britain between 1778 and 1783

The Anglo-French War, also known as the War of 1778 or the Bourbon War in Britain, was a military conflict fought between France and Great Britain, sometimes with their respective allies, between 1778 and 1783. As a consequence, Great Britain was forced to divert resources used to fight the American War of Independence to theatres in Europe, India, and the West Indies, and to rely on what turned out to be the chimera of Loyalist support in its North American operations. From 1778 to 1783, with or without their allies, France and Britain fought over dominance in the English Channel, the Mediterranean, the Indian Ocean and the Caribbean.

References

  1. 1 2 Duffy 1992, p. 110.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Morrissey, p. 54
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Mahan, p. 389
  4. 1 2 Castex, p. 33
  5. Morrissey, p. 56
  6. Weigley, p. 240
  7. Ketchum, pp. 126–157.
  8. Grainger, pp. 44, 56.
  9. Ketchum, p. 197
  10. Linder, p. 15.
  11. Mahan, p. 387
  12. 1 2 Mahan, p. 388
  13. Ketchum, pp. 178–206
  14. Mahan, p. 391
  15. Grainger, p. 51
  16. Larrabee, p. 185
  17. Larrabee, pp. 186, 189
  18. Larrabee, p. 189
  19. Larrabee, p. 188
  20. Larrabee, p. 191
  21. Larrabee, p. 192
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 Morrissey, p. 55
  23. 1 2 Larrabee, p. 193
  24. Grainger, p. 70
  25. Larrabee, p. 195
  26. Larrabee, p. 196
  27. Larrabee, p. 197
  28. Grainger, p. 73
  29. Larrabee, p. 200
  30. 1 2 3 Larrabee, p. 201
  31. 1 2 3 Larrabee, p. 202
  32. Larrabee, p. 204
  33. 1 2 Larrabee, p. 205
  34. 1 2 Larrabee, p. 211
  35. Larrabee, p. 206
  36. Larrabee, pp. 207–208
  37. 1 2 3 Larrabee, p. 212
  38. Larrabee, pp. 213–214
  39. de Grasse, p. 157
  40. de Grasse, p. 158
  41. Larrabee, pp. 220–222
  42. 1 2 Larrabee, p. 220
  43. 1 2 Morrissey, p. 57
  44. Allen, p. 323
  45. Larrabee, p. 225
  46. 1 2 Larrabee, p. 272
  47. Ketchum, p. 208
  48. Morrissey, p. 53
  49. Larrabee, p. 227
  50. Grainger, p. 135
  51. 1 2 Grainger, p. 185
  52. Larrabee, p. 270
  53. Larrabee, p. 277
  54. Larrabee, p. 274
  55. 1 2 Larrabee, p. 275
  56. Larrabee, p. 276
  57. Larrabee, p. 273
  58. Larrabee, p. 190
  59. "Did Hurricanes Save America?" American Heritage, (Eric Jay Dolin. September 2020. Volume 65. Issue 5). https://www.americanheritage.com/did-hurricanes-save-america
  60. National Park Service – Cape Henry Memorial
  61. Misprinted in source as 11.
  62. 1 2 3 Troude (1867), p. 107.
  63. 1 2 Gardiner (1905), p. 119.
  64. Gardiner (1905), p. 129.
  65. Contenson (1934), p. 155.
  66. 1 2 3 4 Antier (1991), p. 185.
  67. 1 2 Gardiner (1905), p. 112.
  68. Contenson (1934), p. 228.
  69. 1 2 3 Troude (1867), p. 109.
  70. d'Hozier, p. 305
  71. 1 2 Gardiner (1905), p. 136.
  72. Gardiner (1905), p. 127.
  73. 1 2 Gardiner (1905), p. 128.
  74. Musée de la Marine (2019), p. 87.
  75. 1 2 Gardiner (1905), p. 116.
  76. Revue maritime et coloniale, Volume 75, p. 163
  77. Gardiner (1905), p. 133.
  78. Gardiner (1905), p. 130.
  79. Lacour-Gayet (1905), p. 625.
  80. Annales maritimes et coloniales / 1, Volume 3, p. 32
  81. Coppolani et al, p. 190
  82. Contenson (1934), p. 167.

Bibliography

Further reading