Bowfin

Last updated

Bowfin
Amia calva 4.jpg
Bowfin in aquarium
Status TNC blank.svg
Unranked (NatureServe) [2]
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Clade: Halecomorphi
Order: Amiiformes
Family: Amiidae
Genus: Amia
Species:
A. calva
Binomial name
Amia calva
Linnaeus, 1766
Synonyms [3] [4]
Species
  • Amia occidentalisDeKay 1842
  • Amia marmorataValenciennes 1847
  • Amia ornataValenciennes 1847
  • Amia viridisValenciennes 1847
  • Amia cinereaValenciennes 1847
  • Amia reticulataValenciennes 1847
  • Amia caninaValenciennes 1847
  • Amia lintiginosaValenciennes 1847
  • Amia subcoeruleaValenciennes 1847
  • Amia thompsoniiDuméril 1870
  • Amia piquotiiDuméril 1870
  • Amiatus calvus(Linnaeus 1766)

The bowfin (Amia calva) is a ray-finned fish native to North America. Common names include mudfish, mud pike, dogfish, grindle, grinnel, swamp trout, and choupique. It is regarded as a relict, being one of only two surviving species of the Halecomorphi, a group of fish that first appeared during the Early Triassic, around 250 million years ago. The bowfin is often considered a "living fossil" because they have retained some morphological characteristics of their early ancestors. It is one of two species in the genus Amia, along with Amia ocellicauda , [5] the eyespot bowfin. The closest living relatives of bowfins are gars, with the two groups being united in the clade Holostei.

Contents

Bowfins are demersal freshwater piscivores, commonly found throughout much of the eastern United States, [2] and in southern Ontario and Quebec. Fossil deposits indicate Amiiformes were once widespread in both freshwater and marine environments across North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Now, their range is limited to much of the eastern United States and adjacent southern Canada, including the drainage basins of the Mississippi River, Great Lakes, and various rivers exiting in the Eastern Seaboard or Gulf of Mexico. Their preferred habitat includes vegetated sloughs, lowland rivers and lakes, swamps, and backwater areas; they are also occasionally found in brackish water. They are stalking, ambush predators known to move into the shallows at night to prey on fish and aquatic invertebrates such as crawfish, mollusks, and aquatic insects.

Like gars, bowfin are bimodal breathers—they have the capacity to breathe both water and air. Their gills exchange gases in the water allowing them to breathe, but they also have a gas bladder that serves to maintain buoyancy, and also allows them to breathe air by means of a small pneumatic duct connected from the foregut to the gas bladder. They can break the surface to gulp air, which allows them to survive conditions of aquatic hypoxia that would be lethal to most other species. The bowfin is long-lived, with age up to 33 years reported. [6]

Bowfin activity in an aquarium

Morphology

The typical length of a bowfin is 50 cm (20 in); [7] females typically grow to 65–70 cm (26–28 in), males to 50–65 cm (20–26 in). [8] They can reach 109 cm (43 in) in length, and weigh 9.75 kg (21.5 lb). [9] Young of the year typically grow to 13–23 cm (5.1–9.1 in) by October. [10] Females tend to grow larger than males. [11] [12]

Diagram showing fins and eyespot of a bowfin, USF&WS Bowfin fin and eyespot diagram.jpg
Diagram showing fins and eyespot of a bowfin, USF&WS

The body of the bowfin is elongated and cylindrical, with the sides and back olive to brown in color, often with vertical bars and dark reticulations or another camouflaged pattern. The dorsal fin has horizontal bars, and the caudal fin has irregular vertical bars. The underside is white or cream, and the paired fins and anal fin are bright green. During larval stage, hatchlings from about 7–10 mm (0.28–0.39 in) total length are black and tadpole-like in appearance. [13] At approximately 25 mm (0.98 in) total length they have been described as looking like miniature placoderms. [14] They grow quickly, and typically leave the nest within 4 to 6 weeks after hatching. [15] Young males have a black eyespot on the base of the tail (caudal peduncle) that is commonly encircled by an orange-yellowish border, while the female's is black, if present at all. It is thought the purpose of the eyespot is to confuse predators, deflecting attacks away from the head of the fish to its tail, which affords the bowfin an opportunity to escape predation. [10] [16] [17] The bowfin is so named for its long, undulating dorsal fin consisting of 145 to 250 rays that runs from the middle of the back to the base of the tail.

The skull of the bowfin is made of two layers of skull, the dermatocranium and the chondrocranium. The chondrocranium layer cannot be seen because it is located below the dermal bones. The bowfin skull is made up of 28 fused bones, which compose the dermatocranium. The roof of the mouth is made up of three bones, the ectopterygoid, the palantine, and the vomer. They have two sets of teeth, including one set of larger sharp teeth coming out of the mandibular and premaxillary bones to grasp and control the prey. The other set of teeth, located posteriorly and connected to the hyomandibular bone, is made up of pharyngeal tooth patches, which are used for sorting out nutrients and grinding down larger pieces of food. [18] [19] [20] Another three bones make up the lower jaw: the dentary, the angular, and the surangular. The cranial surface of the skull is made up of the nasals, the antorbital, the lacrimal, the parietal, the intertemporal, the post parietal, the supratemporal, the extra scapular, the post temporal, and the opercular. The entirety of the skull is attached to the girdle through another set of bones. [21]

Dorsal view of a bowfin skull, showing the pharyngeal tooth patches which are connected to the internal portion of the hyomandibular bone. Acquired from Pacific Lutheran University. Dorsal View of a Bowfin skull.png
Dorsal view of a bowfin skull, showing the pharyngeal tooth patches which are connected to the internal portion of the hyomandibular bone. Acquired from Pacific Lutheran University.
Drawing of a bowfin skull showing the bony plates protecting the head AmiaCalvaHeadLankester.jpg
Drawing of a bowfin skull showing the bony plates protecting the head
Inset, drawing of gular plate FMIB 47066 Amia calva; g, gular plate.jpeg
Inset, drawing of gular plate

Bowfin are often referred to as "living fossils" or "primitive fish" because they retained some of the primitive characters common to their ancestors, [22] including a modified (rounded externally) heterocercal caudal fin, a highly vascularized gas bladder lung, vestiges of a spiral valve, and a bony gular plate. [22] [23] The bony gular plate is located underneath the head on the exterior of the lower jaw between the two sides of the lower jaw bone. Other distinguishing characteristics include long, sharp teeth, and two protruding tube-like nostrils. [16] Unlike all of the most primitive actinopterygians, the scales of bowfin differ in that they are not ganoid scales, rather they are large, single-layered cycloid scales closer in similarity to more derived teleosts. [24] [25]

Lateral view of a bowfin skull: The dermal bones that are seen are composed of dermatocranium and cover the chondrocranium which is present but is located underneath the layer of dermatocranium. This specimen came from the Pacific Lutheran University Natural History collection. Bowfin.png
Lateral view of a bowfin skull: The dermal bones that are seen are composed of dermatocranium and cover the chondrocranium which is present but is located underneath the layer of dermatocranium. This specimen came from the Pacific Lutheran University Natural History collection.

Fish similar in appearance

Northern snakeheads (Channa argus) are commonly mistaken for bowfin because of similarities in appearance, most noticeably their elongated, cylindrical shape, and long dorsal fin that runs along their backs. Northern snakeheads are piscivorous fish native to the rivers and estuaries of China, Russia, and Korea that have been introduced and become established in parts of North America. [26] [27] However, unlike bowfin which are native to North America, the northern snakehead is considered an invasive species and environmentally harmful there. [28] [29] Some contrasting differences in bowfin include a black eyespot on their caudal peduncle, a tan and olive coloration, a shorter anal fin, a more rounded head, [30] pelvic fins at a greater distance from the pectoral fins than in the northern snakehead and the presence of the gular plate on the ventral side of the lower jaw. [27] [31] Another noticeable difference is that bowfin scales do not continue uniformly from their body to their head. Bowfin heads are smooth and free of scales, whereas the northern snakehead has scales that uniformly continue from their body through to their head. [32]

The burbot (Lota lota), a predatory fish native to streams and lakes of North America and Eurasia, is also commonly mistaken for bowfin. Burbots can be distinguished by their flat head and chin barbel, long anal fin, and pelvic fins situated beneath the pectoral fins. [33]

Bowfin body-shape evolution and development

The first fish lacked jaws and used negative pressure to suck their food in through their mouths. The jaw in the bowfin is a result of their evolutionary need to be able to catch and eat bigger and more nutritious prey. As a result of being able to gather more nutrients, Bowfin are able to live a more active lifestyle. The jaw of a bowfin has several adaptations. The maxilla and premaxilla are fused and the posterior chondrocranium articulates with the vertebra which allows the jaw freedom to rotate. The suspensorium includes several bones and articulates with the snout, brain case, and the mandible. When the jaw opens epaxial muscles lift the chondrocranium, which is attached to the upper jaw, while adductor muscles act to close the lower jaw. This ability to open and close the jaw helps the bowfin to be an active predator that can catch bigger prey and digest them. [34]

The vertebral column in bowfin is ossified and in comparison to earlier fish, the centra are the major support for the body, whereas in earlier fish the notochord was the main form of support. In bowfin neural spines and ribs also increase in prominence, an evolutionary aspect that helps provide additional support and stabilize unpaired fins. The evolution of the vertebral column allows the bowfin to withstand lateral bending that puts the column under compression without breaking. This, in turn, allows the bowfin to have more controlled and powerful movements, in comparison to fish that had only a notochord. The bowfin has a rounded heterocercal tail that resembles a homocercal tail. This type of tail gives the body a streamlined shape which allows the bowfin to improve its swimming ability by reducing drag. These types of tails are common in fish with gas bladders, because the bladder supplies the fish with natural buoyancy. [34]

The lower figure is a skeleton of the bowfin. The pelvic and pectoral girdles are both visible and the axial and cranial elements are also both present. Hal - Cyprinus carpio and Amia calva skeletons.jpg
The lower figure is a skeleton of the bowfin. The pelvic and pectoral girdles are both visible and the axial and cranial elements are also both present.

The bowfin is a member of actinopterygii which means that the pectoral girdle is partly endochondral but mostly dermal bone. In this group of fish the fins function to maneuver, brake, and for slight positional adjustments. The pectoral girdle of the bowfin has six parts. The post temporal, supracleithrum, postcleithrum, cleithrum, scapulacoracoid, and the clavicle make up the pectoral girdle. The pectoral girdle is attached to the skull. The paired pectoral and pelvic fins of fish are homologous with the limbs of tetrapods. [34]

Physiology

Dissection of a bowfin swim bladder Amia Gas Bladder.jpg
Dissection of a bowfin swim bladder

Bowfin are physostomes, meaning they have a small "pneumatic duct" that connects their swim bladders to their digestrive tract. This allows them, like lungfish, to "breath" in two ways: they can extract oxygen from the water when breathing through their gills, but can also break the water's surface to breathe or gulp air through the pneumatic duct. [35] [36] When performing low-level physical activity, bowfin obtain more than half of their oxygen from breathing air. [37] The fish have two distinct air-breathing mechanisms used to ventilate the gas bladder. Air breathing type I is consistent with the action of exhale / inhale exchange, stimulated by either air or water hypoxia, to regulate O2 gas exchange; type II air breaths are inhalation alone, which is believed to regulate gas bladder volume, to control buoyancy. [36] Bimodal respiration helps bowfin survive and maintain their metabolic rate in hypoxic (low-oxygen) conditions. [38] [39] [40] Bowfin air breath more frequently when they are in darkness, and correspondingly more active. [7]

Bowfin blood can adapt to warm, acidic waters. [10] The fish becomes inactive in waters below 10 °C (50 °F); [10] at this temperature they breathe almost no air; however, with increasing temperature their air breathing increases. [7] Their preferred temperature range is between 12–26 °C (54–79 °F), with 18 °C (64 °F) the temperature of maximum activity. [41] Air breathing is at a maximum in the range 18.4–29.6 °C (65.1–85.3 °F). Bowfin do not use central chemoreceptor regulation for respiration control. Experiments manipulating the oxygen content, carbon dioxide content, and pH of bowfin extradural fluid did not affect breathing rate, heart rate, or blood pressure pointing to a lack of central chemoreceptor regulation. [42] Instead, bowfin respiratory patterns respond to water oxygen content and water temperature, as water temperatures play a role in oxygen content. In the lab, bowfin showed an increase in the breathing rate when the temperatures were raised above 10°C. [43] Bowfin also showed an increase in breathing rate when exposed to lower oxygen levels in the water. [44]

Herpetologist W. T. Neill reported in 1950 that he unearthed a bowfin aestivating (in a dormant state) in a chamber 4 inches (10 cm) below the ground surface, 8 inches (20 cm) in diameter, .25 miles (0.4 km) from a river. It was further noted that flood levels had previously reached the area, and receded. It is not unusual for riverine species like bowfin to move into backwaters with flood currents, and become trapped when water levels recede. [7] [45] [46] [47] While aestivation is anecdotally documented by multiple researchers, laboratory experiments have suggested instead that bowfin are physiologically incapable of surviving more than three to five days of air exposure. However, no field manipulation has been performed. [48] [49] Regardless of the lack of evidence confirming the bowfin's ability to aestivate, it has been noted that bowfin can survive prolonged conditions of exposure to air because they have the ability to breathe air. Their gill filaments and lamellae are rigid in structure which helps prevent the lamellae from collapsing and aids gas exchange even during air exposure. [50]

Evolution and phylogeny

Competing hypotheses and debates continue over the evolution of Amia and relatives, including their relationship among basal extant teleosts, and organization of clades. [51] Bowfin are the last remaining member of Halecomorphi, a group that includes many extinct species in several families. [52] Halecomorphs were generally accepted as the sister group to Teleostei but not without question. While a halecostome pattern of neopterygian clades was produced in morphology-based analyses of extant actinopterygians, a different result was produced with fossil taxa which showed a monophyletic Holostei. Monophyletic Holostei were also recovered by at least two nuclear gene analyses, in an independent study of fossil and extant fish, [53] [54] and in an analysis of ultraconserved genomic elements. [55]

The extant ray-finned fish of the subclass Actinopterygii include 42 orders, 431 families and over 23,000 species. [56] They are currently classified into two infraclasses, Chondrostei (holosteans) and Neopterygii (teleost fishes). [57] Sturgeons, paddlefish, bichirs and reed fish compose the thirty-eight species of chondrosteans, and are considered relict species. Included in the over 23,000 species of neopterygians are eight relict species comprising gars and the bowfin. [56]

Three divisions of Neopterygii comprising Lepisosteiformes, Amiiformes, and Teleostei Cladogram of basal actinopterygians and neopterygians.png
Three divisions of Neopterygii comprising Lepisosteiformes, Amiiformes, and Teleostei

Infraclass Neopterygii

Neopterygians are the second major occurrence in the evolution of ray-finned fish and today include the majority of modern bony fish. [56] They are distinguished from their earlier ancestors by major changes to the jaws, shape of the skull, and tail. They are divided into three divisions:

Species

The following is a species list[ citation needed ]

  • †Amia depressaMarsh 1871
  • †Amia dictyocephalaCope 1875
  • †Amia elegansLeidy 1873
  • †Amia exilisLambe 1908
  • †Amia fragosa(Jordan 1927)
  • †Amia godaiYabumoto & Grande 2013
  • †Amia gracilisLeidy 1873
  • †Amia lewesiensisMantell 1822
  • †Amia macrospondylaCope 1891
  • †Amia mediaLeidy 1873
  • †Amia moriniPriem 1911
  • †Amia newberrianaMarsh 1871
  • †Amia selwynianaAmi 1891
  • †Amia uintaensisLeidy 1873
  • †Amia whiteavesianaCope 1891
  • †Amia pattersoni
  • †Amia scutataCope 1875
  • Amia calvaLinnaeus 1766 (Bowfin)
  • Amia ocellicauda Todd 1837 (Eyetail bowfin) [5]

Genome evolution

The bowfin genome contains an intact ParaHox gene cluster, similar to the bichir and to most other vertebrates. This is in contrast, however, with teleost fish, which have a fragmented ParaHox cluster, probably because of a whole genome duplication event in their lineage. The presence of an intact ParaHox gene cluster suggests that bowfin ancestors separated from other fish before the last common ancestor of all teleosts appeared. Bowfin are thus possibly a better model to study vertebrate genome organization than common teleost model organisms such as zebrafish. [59]

Feeding behavior

The gill rakers are short with blunt processes and with a small space in between them. They are connected to the gill arch of the gills. Gill Rakers of Amia Calva.jpg
The gill rakers are short with blunt processes and with a small space in between them. They are connected to the gill arch of the gills.

Bowfin are stalking, ambush predators that customarily move into the shallows at night to prey on fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates such as crawfish, other crustaceans, mollusks, and aquatic insects. [60] [15] Young bowfin feed mostly on small crustaceans, while adults are mostly piscivorous, but also known to be opportunistic. [61] Some common examples of prey include frogs, bass, other bowfin, dragonflies, sunfish, crawfish, etc. [15] Bowfin are remarkably agile, can move quickly through the water, and they have a voracious appetite. [8] [16] Their undulating dorsal fin propels them silently through the water while stalking their prey. The attack is straightforward and swift with a movement that lasts approximately 0.075 seconds. [41] There were also some studies regarding the capacity of the bowfin to survive without food. In 1916, a female bowfin was starved for twenty months. [62] It was the longest period that any vertebrate had been without food, as far the writer was aware during the observation. Some independent studies focus on the bowfin's ability to use organic material as a source of food and studied the structure of the gill raker. They concluded that it did not benefit from the organic material in the water because the gill rakers were short with blunt processes and a short space between them. Even bacteria could enter and exit through the gill easily. Its structure alone indicated that the Amia do not use microorganisms as a source of food.[ citation needed ]

Distribution and habitat

Amia calva distribution in the eastern U.S., as well as from the St. Lawrence River and Lake Champlain drainage of southern Ontario and Quebec, westward around Great Lakes in southern Ontario into Minnesota USGSmapBowfinDist.png
Amia calva distribution in the eastern U.S., as well as from the St. Lawrence River and Lake Champlain drainage of southern Ontario and Quebec, westward around Great Lakes in southern Ontario into Minnesota

Fossil deposits indicate amiiforms included freshwater and marine species that were once widely distributed in North America, South America, Eurasia and Africa. [63] Today, bowfin (Amia calva) are the only remaining species in the order Amiiformes; they are demersal freshwater piscivores, and their range is restricted to freshwater environments in North America, including much of the eastern United States and adjacent southern Canada from the St. Lawrence River and Lake Champlain drainage of southern Ontario and Quebec westward around the Great Lakes in southern Ontario into Minnesota. [1] [64]

Historically, their distribution in North America included the drainage basins of the Mississippi River from Quebec to northern Minnesota, the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes, including Georgian Bay, Lake Nipissing and Simcoe, Ontario, south to the Gulf of Mexico; Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain from the Susquehanna River drainage in southeastern Pennsylvania to the Colorado River in Texas. [7] [64] [65]

Stocking

Research from the late 1800s to the 1980s suggests a trend of intentional stockings of non-indigenous fish into ponds, lakes and rivers in the United States. At that time, little was known about environmental impacts, or long-term effects of new species establishment and spread as a result of "fish rescue and transfer" efforts, or the importance of nongame fish to the ecological balance of aquatic ecosystems. [66] Introductions of bowfin to areas they were considered a non-indigenous species included various lakes, rivers and drainages in Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. [64] Many of the introductions were intentional stockings; however, there is no way to positively determine distribution resulting from flood transfers, or other inadvertent migrations. Bowfin are typically piscivorous, but as an introduced species are capable of being voracious predators that pose a threat to native fish and their prey. [64] [67]

Preferred habitat

Bowfin prefer vegetated sloughs, lowland rivers and lakes, swamps, backwater areas, and are occasionally found in brackish water. They are well camouflaged, and not easy to spot in slow water with abundant vegetation. They often seek shelter under roots, and submerged logs. [61] [68] [69] Oxygen-poor environments can be tolerated because of their ability to breathe air. [61]

Life cycle

Bowfin spawn in the spring or early summer, typically between April and June, more commonly at night [41] [61] in abundantly vegetated, clear shallow water in weed beds over sand bars, and also under stumps, logs, and bushes. [70] Optimum temperatures for nesting and spawning range between 16–19 °C (61–66 °F). [12] The males construct circular nests in fibrous root mats, clearing away leaves and stems. Depending on the density of surrounding vegetation there may be a tunnel-like entrance at one side. [70] The diameter of the nests commonly range between 39–91 cm (15–36 in), [12] at a water depth of 61–92 cm (24–36 in). [41]

During spawning season, the fins and underside of male bowfin often change in color to a bright lime green. [71] The courtship/spawning sequence lasts one to three hours, and can repeat up to five times. [41] Courtship begins when a female approaches the nest. The ritual consists of intermittent nose bites, nudges, and chasing behavior by the male until the female becomes receptive, [12] at which time the pair lie side by side in the nest. She deposits her eggs while he shakes his fins in a vibratory movement, and releases his milt for fertilization to occur. [12] A male often has eggs from more than one female in his nest, and a single female often spawns in several nests. [15]

Females vacate the nest after spawning, [41] leaving the male behind to protect the eggs during the eight to ten days of incubation. [16] [70] [72] A nest may contain 2,000 to 5,000 eggs, possibly more. [68] Fecundity is usually related to size of the fish, so it is not unusual for the roe of a large gravid female to contain over 55,000 eggs. [41] [61] Bowfin eggs are adhesive, and will attach to aquatic vegetation, roots, gravel, and sand. [41] After hatching, larval bowfin do not swim actively in search of food. During the seven to nine days required for yolk-sac absorption, they attach to vegetation by means of an adhesive organ on their snout, and remain protected by the parent male bowfin. [68] Bowfin aggressively protect their spawn from the first day of incubation to a month or so after the eggs have hatched. [68] When the fry are able to swim and forage on their own, they will form a school and leave the nest accompanied by the parent male bowfin who slowly circles them to prevent separation. [70]

Bowfin reach sexually maturity at two to three years of age. [61] They can live up to 33 years in the wild, [6] and 30 years in captivity. [16] [70] Bowfin may live decades at adult size. [6]

Diseases

Lernaea, or anchor worm, on a Murray cod. The same parasite also attacks bowfin. Lernaea parasite on a Murray cod.jpg
Lernaea, or anchor worm, on a Murray cod. The same parasite also attacks bowfin.

A common parasite of bowfin is the anchor worm (Lernaea). These small crustaceans infest the skin and bases of fins, with consequences ranging from slowed growth to death. [12] The mollusk Megalonaias gigantea lays eggs in the bowfin gills, that are then externally fertilized by sperm passing in the water flow. The small glochidia larvae then hatch and develop in the gill tubes. [12]

Bowfin with liver cancer and with fatal leukemia have been reported. [10]

Utilization

Freshly caught bowfin Bowfin (Amia calva) (4015394787).jpg
Freshly caught bowfin

As a sport fish, bowfin are not considered desirable to many anglers. They were once considered a nuisance fish by anglers and early biologists who believed the bowfin's predatory nature was harmful to sport fish populations. As a result, efforts were taken to reduce their numbers. [73] Research has since proven otherwise, and that knowledge together with a better understanding of maintaining overall balance of ecosystems, regulations were introduced to help protect and maintain viable populations of bowfin. [73] Bowfin are strong fighters, a prized trait in game fish. However, they do have a jaw full of sharp teeth which requires careful handling. The current tackle record is 21.5 lb (9.8 kg) [8] [65] [74]

Bowfin were once considered to have little commercial value because of its poor-tasting meat which has been referred to as "soft, bland-tasting and of poor texture". [8] However, it is considered quite palatable if cleaned properly and smoked, or prepared fried, blackened, used in courtbouillion, or in fishballs or fishcakes. [8] [16] [65] [75] Over the years, global efforts have imposed strict regulations on the international trade of caviar, particularly on the harvest of sturgeons from the Caspian Sea where the highly prized caviar from the beluga sturgeon originates. The bans imposed on Caspian sturgeons have created lucrative markets for affordable substitutes in the United States including paddlefish, bowfin, and various species of sturgeon. [76] In Louisiana, bowfin are harvested in the wild, and cultured commercially in hatcheries for their meat and roe. The roe is processed into caviar, and sold as "Cajun caviar", or marketed under the trade name "Choupiquet Royale". [11] [41] [77]

Accumulation of toxic substances

In some areas of the United States where aquatic environments have tested positive for elevated levels of toxins, such as mercury, arsenic, chromium, and copper, there are posted signs with warnings about the consumption of fish caught in those areas. [78] Concentration of mercury biomagnifies as it passes up the food chain from organisms on lower trophic levels to apex predators. It bioaccumulates in the tissues of larger, long-lived predatory fish. When compared to smaller, short-lived fish, bowfin tend to concentrate mercury at higher levels thereby making them less safe for human consumption. [11] [79]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Actinopterygii</span> Class of ray-finned bony fishes

Actinopterygii, members of which are known as ray-finned fish or actinopterygians, is a class of bony fish that comprise over 50% of living vertebrate species. They are so called because of their lightly built fins made of webbings of skin supported by radially extended thin bony spines called lepidotrichia, as opposed to the bulkier, fleshy lobed fins of the sister class Sarcopterygii. Resembling folding fans, the actinopterygian fins can easily change shape and wetted area, providing superior thrust-to-weight ratios per movement compared to sarcopterygian and chondrichthyian fins. The fin rays attach directly to the proximal or basal skeletal elements, the radials, which represent the articulation between these fins and the internal skeleton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Osteichthyes</span> Diverse group of vertebrates with skeletons of bone rather than cartilage

Osteichthyes, also known as osteichthyans or commonly referred to as the bony fish, is a diverse superclass of vertebrate animals that have endoskeletons primarily composed of bone tissue. They can be contrasted with the Chondrichthyes and the extinct placoderms and acanthodians, which have endoskeletons primarily composed of cartilage. The vast majority of extant fish are members of Osteichthyes, being an extremely diverse and abundant group consisting of 45 orders, over 435 families and 28,000 species. It is the largest class of vertebrates in existence today, encompassing most aquatic vertebrates, as well as all semi-aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swim bladder</span> Gas-filled organ that contributes to the ability of a fish to control its buoyancy

The swim bladder, gas bladder, fish maw, or air bladder is an internal gas-filled organ in bony fish that functions to modulate buoyancy, and thus allowing the fish to stay at desired water depth without having to maintain lift via swimming, which expends more energy. Also, the dorsal position of the swim bladder means that the expansion of the bladder moves the center of mass downwards, allowing it to act as a stabilizing agent in some species. Additionally, the swim bladder functions as a resonating chamber, to produce or receive sound.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lungfish</span> Type of lobefinned fishes

Lungfish are freshwater vertebrates belonging to the class Dipnoi. Lungfish are best known for retaining ancestral characteristics within the Osteichthyes, including the ability to breathe air, and ancestral structures within Sarcopterygii, including the presence of lobed fins with a well-developed internal skeleton. Lungfish represent the closest living relatives of the tetrapods. The mouths of lungfish typically bear tooth plates, which are used to crush hard shelled organisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amiiformes</span> Order of fishes

The Amiiformes order of fish has only two extant species, the bowfins: Amia calva and Amia ocellicauda, the latter recognized as a separate species in 2022. These Amiiformes are found in the freshwater systems of North America, in the United States and parts of southern Canada. They live in freshwater streams, rivers, and swamps. The order first appeared in the Triassic, and the extinct members include both marine and freshwater species, many of which are morphologically disparate from bowfins, such as the caturids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amiidae</span> Family of ray-finned fishes

The Amiidae are a family of basal ray-finned fishes. The bowfin and the eyespot bowfin are the only two species to survive today, although additional species in all four subfamilies of Amiidae are known from Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Eocene fossils.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teleost</span> Infraclass of fishes

Teleostei, members of which are known as teleosts, is, by far, the largest infraclass in the class Actinopterygii, the ray-finned fishes, and contains 96% of all extant species of fish. Teleosts are arranged into about 40 orders and 448 families. Over 26,000 species have been described. Teleosts range from giant oarfish measuring 7.6 m (25 ft) or more, and ocean sunfish weighing over 2 t, to the minute male anglerfish Photocorynus spiniceps, just 6.2 mm (0.24 in) long. Including not only torpedo-shaped fish built for speed, teleosts can be flattened vertically or horizontally, be elongated cylinders or take specialised shapes as in anglerfish and seahorses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fish anatomy</span> Study of the form or morphology of fishes

Fish anatomy is the study of the form or morphology of fish. It can be contrasted with fish physiology, which is the study of how the component parts of fish function together in the living fish. In practice, fish anatomy and fish physiology complement each other, the former dealing with the structure of a fish, its organs or component parts and how they are put together, such as might be observed on the dissecting table or under the microscope, and the latter dealing with how those components function together in living fish.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fish</span> Gill-bearing non-tetrapod aquatic vertebrates

A fish is an aquatic, anamniotic, gill-bearing vertebrate animal with swimming fins and a hard skull, but lacking limbs with digits. Fish can be grouped into the more basal jawless fish and the more common jawed fish, the latter including all living cartilaginous and bony fish, as well as the extinct placoderms and acanthodians. Most fish are cold-blooded, their body temperature varying with the surrounding water, though some large active swimmers like white shark and tuna can hold a higher core temperature. Many fish can communicate acoustically with each other, such as during courtship displays.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Holostei</span> Group of bony fish

Holostei is a group of ray-finned bony fish. It is divided into two major clades, the Halecomorphi, represented by the single living genus, Amia with two species, the bowfins, as well as the Ginglymodi, the sole living representatives being the gars (Lepisosteidae), represented by seven living species in two genera. The earliest members of the clade, which are putative "semionotiforms" such as Acentrophorus and Archaeolepidotus, are known from the Middle to Late Permian and are among the earliest known neopterygians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Branchial arch</span> Bony "loops" present in fish, which support the gills

Branchial arches or gill arches are a series of paired bony/cartilaginous "loops" behind the throat of fish, which support the fish gills. As chordates, all vertebrate embryos develop pharyngeal arches, though the eventual fate of these arches varies between taxa. In all jawed fish (gnathostomes), the first arch pair develops into the jaw, the second gill arches develop into the hyomandibular complex, and the remaining posterior arches support the gills. In tetrapods, a mostly terrestrial clade evolved from lobe-finned fish, many pharyngeal arch elements are lost, including the gill arches. In amphibians and reptiles, only the oral jaws and a hyoid apparatus remains, and in mammals and birds the hyoid is simplified further to support the tongue and floor of the mouth. In mammals, the first and second pharyngeal arches also give rise to the auditory ossicles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diversity of fish</span> Fish species categorized by various characteristics

Fish are very diverse animals and can be categorised in many ways. Although most fish species have probably been discovered and described, about 250 new ones are still discovered every year. According to FishBase about 34,800 species of fish had been described as of February 2022, which is more than the combined total of all other vertebrate species: mammals, amphibians, reptiles and birds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of fish</span> Origin and diversification of fish through geologic time

The evolution of fish began about 530 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion. It was during this time that the early chordates developed the skull and the vertebral column, leading to the first craniates and vertebrates. The first fish lineages belong to the Agnatha, or jawless fish. Early examples include Haikouichthys. During the late Cambrian, eel-like jawless fish called the conodonts, and small mostly armoured fish known as ostracoderms, first appeared. Most jawless fish are now extinct; but the extant lampreys may approximate ancient pre-jawed fish. Lampreys belong to the Cyclostomata, which includes the extant hagfish, and this group may have split early on from other agnathans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of tetrapods</span> Evolution of four legged vertebrates and their derivatives

The evolution of tetrapods began about 400 million years ago in the Devonian Period with the earliest tetrapods evolved from lobe-finned fishes. Tetrapods are categorized as animals in the biological superclass Tetrapoda, which includes all living and extinct amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. While most species today are terrestrial, little evidence supports the idea that any of the earliest tetrapods could move about on land, as their limbs could not have held their midsections off the ground and the known trackways do not indicate they dragged their bellies around. Presumably, the tracks were made by animals walking along the bottoms of shallow bodies of water. The specific aquatic ancestors of the tetrapods, and the process by which land colonization occurred, remain unclear. They are areas of active research and debate among palaeontologists at present.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Halecomorphi</span> Clade of fishes

Halecomorphi is a taxon of ray-finned bony fish in the clade Neopterygii. The only extant Halecomorph species are the bowfin and eyespot bowfin, but the group contains many extinct species in several families in the order Amiiformes, as well as the extinct orders Ionoscopiformes, Panxianichthyiformes, and Parasemionotiformes. The fossil record of halecomorphs goes back at least to the Early Triassic epoch.

<i>Amia</i> (fish) Genus of ray-finned fishes

Amia, commonly called bowfin, is a genus of ray-finned fish related to gars in the infraclass Holostei. They are regarded as taxonomic relicts, being the sole surviving species of the order Amiiformes and clade Halecomorphi, which dates from the Triassic to the Eocene, persisting to the present. There are two living species in Amia, Amia calva and Amia ocellicauda, and a number of extinct species which have been described from the fossil record.

<i>Amia</i>? <i>hesperia</i> Extinct species of ray-finned fish

Amia? hesperia is an extinct species of ray-finned fish in the bowfin family, Amiidae. The species is known from fossils found in the early Eocene deposits of northern Washington state in the United States and southeastern British Columbia. The species is one of eight fish species identified in the Eocene Okanagan Highlands paleofauna.

Maliamia is an extinct genus of amiid ray-finned fish from the Early Eocene, known from fragmentary remains found in the Tamaguélelt Formation of Mali. It was described in 1989, based on fossils recovered by three separate expeditions in 1975, 1979–80, and 1981. The type species is Maliamia gigas, named in reference to its large size.

<i>Amia ocellicauda</i> Species of ray-finned fish

Amia ocellicauda, the eyespot bowfin, is a species of bowfin native to North America. Originally described by John Richardson from Lake Huron in 1836, it was synonymized with Amia calva until genetic work in 2022 revealed them to be separate species. This species ranges from around the Great Lakes south to the Gulf Coast wetlands of Louisiana and Texas. It is absent from the southeast, where its sister species Amia calva is found instead.

<i>Cyclurus</i> Extinct genus of ray-finned fishes

Cyclurus is an extinct genus of freshwater amiid ray-finned fish known from the Late Cretaceous to the Early Oligocene across much of the Northern Hemisphere. It is thought to be the closest relative of the extant bowfins in the genus Amia, although species of Cyclurus were significantly smaller in size compared to Amia.

References

  1. 1 2 NatureServe (2013). "Amia calva". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . 2013: e.T201942A2730796. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T201942A2730796.en . Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  2. 1 2 "Amia calva". NatureServe Explorer An online encyclopedia of life. 7.1. NatureServe. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
  3. ↑ Froese, R.; Pauly, D. (2017). "Amiidae". FishBase . nversion (02/2017). Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  4. ↑ "Amiidae" (PDF). Deeplyfish – fishes of the world. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  5. 1 2 Brownstein, C.D.; Kim, D.; Orr, O.D.; Hogue, G.M.; Tracy, B.H.; Pugh, M.W.; Singer, R.; Myles-McBurney, C.; et al. (27 July 2022). "Hidden species diversity in a living fossil vertebrate". Biology Letters. 18 (11). bioRxiv   10.1101/2022.07.25.500718 . doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0395 . PMC   9709656 . PMID   36448369. S2CID   251162051. Art. No. 20220395.
  6. 1 2 3 Lackmann, Alec R.; Bielak-Lackmann, Ewelina S.; Butler, Malcolm G.; Clark, Mark E. (2022-08-23). "Otoliths suggest lifespans more than 30 years for free-living Bowfin Amia calva – implications for fisheries management in the bowfishing era". Journal of Fish Biology. 101 (5): 1301–1311. Bibcode:2022JFBio.101.1301L. doi:10.1111/jfb.15201. ISSN   0022-1112. PMC   9826520 . PMID   36053840.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 "Bowfin Family-Amiidae" (PDF). Wisconsin State Department of Natural Resources. University of Wisconsin. p. 254. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Kenneth Stewart; Douglas Watkinson (3 May 2004). Freshwater Fish of Manitoba. Univ. of Manitoba Press. p. 51. ISBN   978-0-88755-374-5.
  9. ↑ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Family Amiidae". FishBase . January 2009 version.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Stauffer, Jay (1 December 2007). Fish of West Virginia. Academy of Natural Sciences. p. 40. ISBN   978-1-4223-1783-9.
  11. 1 2 3 Davis, Johnathan G. (Fall 2003). Reproductive Biology, Life History and Population Structure of a Bowfin Amia calva Population in Southeastern Louisiana (PDF) (Thesis). Thibodaux, Louisiana: Nicholls State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 18, 2016. Retrieved June 7, 2014.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 University of Florida. "Bowfin". Ichthyology at the Florida Museum of Natural History. Florida Museum of Natural History. Retrieved June 11, 2014.
  13. ↑ Jeff Hansbarger (2006). "Bowfin" (PDF). Wildlife Diversity Notebook. West Virginia DNR. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
  14. ↑ Berra, Tim (September 15, 2008). "Families and Maps". Freshwater Fish Distribution. University of Chicago Press. p. 52. ISBN   9780226044439.
  15. 1 2 3 4 "Amia calva". Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Schultz, Ken (15 December 2010). Ken Schultz's Field Guide to Freshwater Fish. John Wiley & Sons. p. 64. ISBN   978-1-118-03987-8.
  17. ↑ "Bowfin (Almia calva)" (PDF). Indiana Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved June 13, 2014.
  18. ↑ Allis, Edward Phelps (1897). "The Morphology of the Petrosal Bone and of the Sphenoidal Region of the Skull of Amia Calva". Zoological Bulletin. 1 (1): 1–26. doi:10.2307/1535409. ISSN   0898-1051. JSTOR   1535409.
  19. ↑ Prather, J. M. (1900). "The Early Stages in the Development of the Hypophysis of Amia Calva". The Biological Bulletin. 1 (2): 57–80–1. doi:10.2307/1535750. ISSN   0006-3185. JSTOR   1535750.
  20. ↑ Allis, Edward Phelps (1898). "The Homologies of the Occipital and First Spinal Nerves of Amia and Teleosts". Zoological Bulletin. 2 (2): 83–97. doi:10.2307/1535454. ISSN   0898-1051. JSTOR   1535454.
  21. ↑ V., Kardong, Kenneth (2012-01-01). Vertebrates : comparative anatomy, function, evolution. McGraw-Hill. ISBN   9780073524238. OCLC   732361696.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. 1 2 Jared Handley & Jesse Fielder (2004). "The Skeletal System of the Bowfin (Amia calva)". Murray State University.
  23. ↑ Nelson, Joseph S. (2006). Fish of the World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN   978-0-471-25031-9.
  24. ↑ "Actinopterygians: What Are They?" (PDF). Biology of Fish-Fish/Biol 311. University of Washington. Retrieved August 8, 2014.
  25. ↑ Gene Helfman; Bruce B. Collette; Douglas E. Facey; Brian W. Bowen (3 April 2009). The Diversity of Fish: Biology, Evolution, and Ecology. John Wiley & Sons. p. 37. ISBN   978-1-4443-1190-7.
  26. ↑ "Northern Snakehead Fish". New York Department of Environmental Conservation. Retrieved July 22, 2014.
  27. 1 2 Fuller, P.L; Benson, A.J.; Nunez, G.; Fusaro, A.; Neilson, M. (31 December 2019) [Peer reviewed on 22 September 2015]. "Channa argus (Cantor, 1842)". Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  28. ↑ "Bowfin and Snakeheads: Distinguishing Features". Brochure. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
  29. ↑ Deborah Zabarenko (May 30, 2013). "Northern Snakehead Fish, Invasive Species, May Not Be As Bad As Originally Thought". Huffington Post Green. Reuters. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
  30. ↑ DNR (June 27, 2012). "Bowfin mistaken as snakeheads". Alerts and Notifications, event calendar press release. Indiana Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved June 14, 2014.
  31. ↑ "Northern Snakehead". Ontario's Invading Species Awareness Program. Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters. 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  32. ↑ "Bowfin vs Snakehead 101: How to tell the difference between these two fish | Wild Hydro". 3 November 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-10.
  33. ↑ Bureau of Fisheries Management. "Snakehead, Bowfin, or Burbot — Know the difference" (PDF). Wisconsin Anglers Want To Know brochures. Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources. Retrieved June 14, 2014.
  34. 1 2 3 Kardong, Kenneth V. (2015). Vertebrates: Comparative anatomy, function, evolution. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
  35. ↑ "Swimbladder" (PDF). Fish / Biol 311 (class notes). Biology of Fish. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
  36. 1 2 Hedrick, M.S.; Jones, D.R. (January 1999). "Control of gill ventilation and air-breathing in the bowfin Amia calva". J. Exp. Biol. 202 (1): 87–94. doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.1.87 . PMID   9841898.
  37. ↑ Jackson, D.C.; Farmer, C.G. (March 5, 1998). "Air-breathing during activity in the fish Lepisosteus oculatus and Amia calva" (PDF). The Journal of Experimental Biology (201): 943–948. Retrieved 8 June 2014.
  38. ↑ Boutilier, R.G. (1990). "Control and Co-Ordination of Gas Exchange in Bimodal Breathers". Vertebrate Gas Exchange. Advances in Comparative and Environmental Physiology. Vol. 6. pp. 279–345. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75380-0_9. ISBN   978-3-642-75382-4.
  39. ↑ McKenzie, David J.; Steffensen, John F.; Taylor, Edwin W. & Abe, Augusto S. (19 December 2011). "The contribution of air breathing to aerobic scope and exercise performance in the banded knifefish Gymnotus carapo L.". Journal of Experimental Biology. 215 (8): 1323–1330, Introduction. doi: 10.1242/jeb.064543 . PMID   22442370.
  40. ↑ "Canon Envirothon Water Quality Study" (PDF). Water Quality Assessment Division. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. 2005. p. 18. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 13, 2013. Retrieved June 13, 2014.
  41. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ross, Stephen T. (2001). The Inland Fish of Mississippi. Univ. Press of Mississippi. p. 94. ISBN   978-1-57806-246-1.
  42. ↑ HEDRICK, M. S.; BURLESON, M. L.; JONES, D. R.; MILSOM, W. K. (1991-01-01). "An Examination of Central Chemosensitivity in an Air-Breathing Fish (Amia Calva)". Journal of Experimental Biology. 155 (1): 165–174. doi:10.1242/jeb.155.1.165. ISSN   0022-0949.
  43. ↑ Horn, M. H.; Riggs, C. (1973). "Effects of Temperature and Light on the Rate of Air Breathing of the Bowfin, Amia calva". Copeia. 1973 (4): 653–657. doi:10.2307/1443063. JSTOR   1443063. S2CID   86886787.
  44. ↑ Glass, Mogens L.; Wood, Stephen C., eds. (2009). Cardio-Respiratory Control in Vertebrates. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-93985-6. ISBN   978-3-540-93984-9.
  45. ↑ Neill, W.T. (1950). Copeia, 1950, An estivating bowfin. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. p. 240. ISBN   9780521739672.
  46. ↑ Loftus, William F.; Kushlan, James A. (1987). "Freshwater fish of southern Florida". Florida State Museum Biological Sciences. p. 183.
  47. ↑ Wolfgang J. Plunk; Peter B. Bayley; Richard E. Sparks (1989). The Flood Pulse Concept in River-Floodplain Systems (PDF) (Report). University of Florida. pp. 117, 8–pdf. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-21. Retrieved 2014-06-09.
  48. ↑ McKenzie, D. J.; Randall, D. J. (1990). "Does Amia calva aestivate?". Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 8 (2): 147–58. Bibcode:1990FPBio...8..147M. doi:10.1007/BF00004442. PMID   24221948. S2CID   20401237.
  49. ↑ Gene Helfman; Bruce B. Collette; Douglas E. Facey; Brian W. Bowen (2009). The Diversity of Fish: Biology, Evolution, and Ecology . Wiley-Blackwell. p.  257, Chapter 13. ISBN   9781405124942.
  50. ↑ Melvin L. Warren Jr.; Brooks M. Burr (July 2014). Freshwater Fish of North America. Vol. 1: Petromyzontidae to Catostomidae. JHU Press. pp. 288–289. ISBN   9781421412016.
  51. ↑ Arratia, Gloria (2001). "The Sister-Group of Teleostei: Consensus And Disagreements". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 21 (4): 767–773. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0767:TSGOTC]2.0.CO;2. S2CID   85895344.
  52. ↑ Guang-Hui Xu; Li-Jun Zhao; Michael I. Coates (May 2014). "The oldest ionoscopiform from China sheds new light on the early evolution of halecomorph fish". Biology Letters. 10 (5): 20140204. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0204. PMC   4046378 . PMID   24872460.
  53. ↑ Imogen A. Hurley; Rachel Lockridge Mueller; Katherine A. Dunn; Eric J. Schmidt; Matt Friedman; Robert K. Ho; Victoria E. Prince; Ziheng Yang; Mark G. Thomas & Michael I. Coates (February 2007). "A New Time-Scale for Ray-Finned Fish Evolution". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1609): 489–498. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3749. JSTOR   25223804. PMC   1766393 . PMID   17476768.
  54. ↑ Broughton, Richard E. (2013). "Multi-locus phylogenetic analysis reveals the pattern and tempo of bony fish evolution". PLOS Currents. 5. doi: 10.1371/currents.tol.2ca8041495ffafd0c92756e75247483e (inactive 1 November 2024). PMC   3682800 . PMID   23788273.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  55. ↑ Faircloth, Brant C. (2013). "A Phylogenomic Perspective on the Radiation of Ray-Finned Fish Based upon Targeted Sequencing of Ultraconserved Elements (UCEs)". PLOS ONE. 8 (6): e65923. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...865923F. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065923 . PMC   3688804 . PMID   23824177.
  56. 1 2 3 "SUBCLASS ACTINOPTERYGII: RELICT SPECIES OF RAY-FINNED FISH & ORIGIN OF TELEOSTS". University of Edinburgh. January 2007. Retrieved September 29, 2014.
  57. ↑ Kanae Kikugawa; Kazutaka Katoh; Shigehiro Kuraku; Hiroshi Sakurai; Osamu Ishida; Naoyuki Iwabe; Takashi Miyata (March 11, 2004). "Basal jawed vertebrate phylogeny inferred from multiple nuclear DNA-coded genes". BMC Biology. 2 (1): 3. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-2-3 . PMC   387836 . PMID   15070407.
  58. ↑ Thom Holmes (June 28, 2008). The First Vertebrate. Chelsea House Publishers. p. 144. ISBN   9780816059584.
  59. ↑ Mulley, John F.; Chiu, Chi-hua; Holland, Peter W. H. (2006). "Breakup of a homeobox cluster after genome duplication in teleosts". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 103 (27): 10369–10372. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10310369M. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600341103 . PMC   1502464 . PMID   16801555.
  60. ↑ Indiana Department of Fish & Wildlfife. "Bowfin (Amia calva)" (PDF). Indiana Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved June 13, 2014.
  61. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Arndt, Rudolf G.; Foltz, Jeffrey W. (2009). Freshwater Fish of South Carolina. Univ of South Carolina Press. p. 80. ISBN   978-1-57003-680-4.
  62. ↑ Smallwood, W.M. (1916-01-01). "Twenty months of starvation in Amia calva". Biological Bulletin. 31 (6): 453–464. doi:10.2307/1536322. JSTOR   1536322.
  63. ↑ Hart, Paul J.B.; Reynolds, John D. (2002). Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries. Wiley. p. 27. ISBN   978-0-632-05412-1.
  64. 1 2 3 4 Fuller, Pam (31 March 2020) [Peer reviewed on 11 April 2006]. "Amia calva Linnaeus, 1766". USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida: US Geological Survey. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  65. 1 2 3 John Acorn (7 February 2007). Deep Alberta: Fossil Facts and Dinosaur Digs . University of Alberta. p.  10. ISBN   978-0-88864-481-7.
  66. ↑ "Early Limnological and Fishery Research" (PDF). Wisconsin Fish and Fishery Management. University of Wisconsin. p. 29. Retrieved 9 August 2014.
  67. ↑ J. Richard Arthur; Rohana P. Subasinghe. "Potential Adverse Socio-Economic And Biological Impacts Of Aquatic Animal Pathogens Due To Hatchery-Based Enhancement Of Inland Open-Water Systems, And Possibilities For Their Minimisation". Primary aquatic animal health care in rural, small-scale, aquaculture. Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
  68. 1 2 3 4 Miller, Rudolph John; Robison, Henry W. (2004). Fish of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 58. ISBN   978-0-8061-3610-3.
  69. ↑ Joshua Laerm; B. J. Freeman (January 2008). Fish of the Okefenokee Swamp. University of Georgia Press. p. 37. ISBN   978-0-8203-3135-5.
  70. 1 2 3 4 5 Thomas, Chad; Bonner, Timothy; Whiteside, Timothy H. (18 June 2007). Freshwater Fish of Texas. Texas A&M University Press. p. 23. ISBN   9781585445707 . Retrieved 1 July 2017.
  71. ↑ Jackson, Randy. "The Bowfin: New York's disrespected living fossil". New York Department of Environmental Conservation. Archived from the original on 27 April 2021. Retrieved 11 June 2014.
  72. ↑ Berra, Tim M. (2001). Freshwater Fish Distribution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ISBN   0-12-093156-7.
  73. 1 2 Randy Jackson. "The Bowfin, New York's Disrespected Living Fossil". New York Department of Environmental Conservation. Archived from the original on April 27, 2021. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  74. ↑ IGFA. "Bowfin". International Game Fish Association. Archived from the original on October 12, 2018. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  75. ↑ Bourgeois, David A. (April 5, 2009). "Choupique may be a trash fish for some, treasure to others". Daily Comet. Archived from the original on March 14, 2016. Retrieved June 8, 2014.
  76. ↑ Saulny, Susan (9 June 2012). "A roe, by any other name". The New York Times .
  77. ↑ Scharpf, Christopher (30 December 2013). "Bowfin: North America's Freshwater Thug". USF&WS.
  78. ↑ "Fish Consumption Advisories". Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
  79. ↑ "What fish are safe to eat?" (PDF). North Carolina Division of Public Health. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 September 2013. Retrieved 1 July 2017.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.