Controlled digital lending

Last updated
Representation of Controlled Digital Lending process CDLmain.jpg
Representation of Controlled Digital Lending process

Controlled digital lending (CDL) is a model by which libraries digitize materials in their collection and make them available for lending. It is based on interpretations of the United States copyright principles of fair use and copyright exhaustion.

Contents

Proponents argue that CDL is legal under those principles because it relies on digital rights management (DRM) to ensure that any library-owned digitized work that is in copyright is loaned for a limited period of time, and that a one-to-one ratio of owned copies to borrowers is maintained. Opponents criticize this interpretation, arguing that CDL involves copying, not mere lending, and that a library's purchase of a physical book does not entitle it to produce and lend an e-book or distribute digital copies.

Development

A precursor to CDL was the "Digitize and Lend" program begun in 2011 by the Open Library, a program of the Internet Archive. Also in 2011, the basic principles of CDL were articulated by Michelle Wu in her paper Building a Collaborative Digital Collection: A Necessary Evolution in Libraries. [1] The use of the term "Controlled Digital Lending" to refer to this concept first appeared in the Position Statement on Controlled Digital Lending, published in 2018 [2] alongside a white paper explaining their legal arguments. [3]

CDL is increasingly being considered by a number of libraries and is being followed by library organizations across the United States [4] as well as in other countries. [5] [6] Brazilian experts have argued that CDL can be applied in the country through a systematic interpretation of cultural rights that extrinsically limits copyright. [7] The Internet Archive has gathered together 12 stories from their blog about libraries that are engaged in aspects of CDL. [8] Lisa Petrides argues that in terms of school libraries, CDL is a positive step forward, but does not go far enough. [9]

In May 2021, the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) stated that "there is a strong socio-economic case" for CDL; that CDL respects "a number of desirable and widely-recognised principles [...] (libraries' ability to freely acquire and lend, the technological neutrality of law, the possibility to combine exceptions)"; that CDL's legal basis supports the wider public interest. [10]

Mechanism

One of the core activities of a library is to loan materials, and proponents argue that CDL is a modern digital extension of this function. With CDL, a library takes a physical copy of a legally acquired item and digitizes it. After digitization, DRM is applied to the digital version, and the physical item is then made unavailable for loan. The library catalog record is usually the mechanism to give access to the digital loan, so the record is changed to point to the repository where the digital copy resides. In this way, there is only one copy being loaned for each copy owned by the library. After the loan expires, the DRM software removes the previous borrower's access and the book is available for loan to another patron. [11]

The National Writers Union, an opponent of CDL, argues that CDL is not like lending, which does not require copying, and dispute the claim that only one copy at a time is available for reading. They say that CDL involves first making an unauthorized digital copy of a printed edition of a work, and then making an additional unauthorized digital copy for each "borrower". They also argue that unencrypted digital copies are distributed for viewing in a Web browser, and that these copies can be retained, viewed, or printed from the browser cache even after the e-book is marked as "returned" and is available for "lending" to other readers. [12]

Controversy

Authors' and publishers' groups have questioned the copyright interpretations that underlie CDL. [13] In early 2019, the National Writers Union and a coalition of forty national and international organizations and federations of writers, photographers, visual artists, translators, publishers, and reproduction rights organizations released a statement entitled "Appeal from the victims of Controlled Digital Lending (CDL)" [14] that claimed that CDL "violates the economic and moral rights of authors."

In a news article in Publishers Weekly [15] The American Association of Publishers is quoted as stating that CDL "'denigrates' the incentive copyright provides for authors and publishers." The Authors Guild relies on the case of Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. , which established that ReDigi could not resell digital music, to argue that libraries would similarly be prohibited from loaning digitized version of books that were legally purchased, and argues that CDL results in lost sales. [16]

Various scholars have framed the Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. as leaving room for CDL as part of a library's non-profit, educational mission. For example, the opinion, authored by Judge Pierre N. Leval, found ReDigi had no actual control of the digital music being sold (licensed iTunes mp3's) and that ReDigi "made reproductions of Plaintiffs' works for the purpose of resale in competition with the Plaintiffs' market for the sale of their sound recordings." Various scholars have pointed out that libraries are not selling works in direct competition with publishers, like the Defendant in ReDigi. [17] [18] Libraries are purchasing books from the marketplace in order to loan the books to their patrons. Additionally Judge Pierre N. Leval, also the originator of the doctrine of transformative fair use, explained in the opinion that a use can be transformative when it "utilizes technology to achieve the transformative purpose of improving delivery of content without unreasonably encroaching on the commercial entitlements of the rights holder." Again, analyzing this language from the case, some scholars have asserted that CDL does not unreasonably encroach the market for these books any differently than the legal uses already permitted by the copyright law when libraries loan books physically. [17] [19]

In Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, 542 F.Supp. 1156 (2023), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York determined that the Internet Archive committed copyright infringement by scanning and distributing copies of books online. Stemming from the creation of the National Emergency Library (NEL) during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, publishing company Hachette Book Group alleged that the Open Library and the National Emergency Library facilitated copyright infringement. The case involves the fair use of controlled digital lending (CDL) systems.

On March 25, 2023, the court ruled against Internet Archive, which plans on appealing. [20] On August 11, 2023 the parties reached a negotiated judgement. The agreement prescribes a permanent injunction against the Internet Archive preventing it from distributing the plaintiffs books as well as an undisclosed payment to plaintiffs. The agreement also preserves the right for the Internet Archive to appeal the previous ruling. [21]

In the United Kingdom, which does not have the concept of fair use that American copyright law has, there have been legal threats from the Society of Authors against the Internet Archive for lending works under British copyright in a country where controlled digital lending is not legal. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright</span> Legal concept regulating rights of a creative work

A copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives the creator of an original work, or another right holder, the exclusive and legally secured right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time. The creative work may be in a literary, artistic, educational, or musical form. Copyright is intended to protect the original expression of an idea in the form of a creative work, but not the idea itself. A copyright is subject to limitations based on public interest considerations, such as the fair use doctrine in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Warez</span> Movies, software or music distributed in violation of copyright

Warez is a common computing and broader cultural term referring to pirated software that is distributed via the Internet. Warez is used most commonly as a noun, a plural form of ware, and is intended to be pronounced like the word wares. The circumvention of copy protection (cracking) is an essential step in generating warez, and based on this common mechanism, the software-focused definition has been extended to include other copyright-protected materials, including movies and games. The global array of warez groups has been referred to as "The Scene", deriving from its earlier description as "the warez scene". Distribution and trade of copyrighted works without payment of fees or royalties generally violates national and international copyright laws and agreements. The term warez covers supported as well as unsupported (abandonware) items, and legal prohibitions governing creation and distribution of warez cover both profit-driven and "enthusiast" generators and distributors of such items.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of copyright</span> Dissenting views of copyright law

Criticism of copyright, or anti-copyright sentiment, is a dissenting view of the current state of copyright law or copyright as a concept. Critics often discuss philosophical, economical, or social rationales of such laws and the laws' implementations, the benefits of which they claim do not justify the policy's costs to society. They advocate for changing the current system, though different groups have different ideas of what that change should be. Some call for remission of the policies to a previous state—copyright once covered few categories of things and had shorter term limits—or they may seek to expand concepts like fair use that allow permissionless copying. Others seek the abolition of copyright itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Archive</span> American nonprofit digital archive

The Internet Archive is an American nonprofit digital library founded on May 10, 1996, and chaired by free information advocate Brewster Kahle. It provides free access to collections of digitized materials including websites, software applications, music, audiovisual and print materials. The Archive also advocates for a free and open Internet. As of February 4, 2024, the Internet Archive holds more than 44 million print materials, 10.6 million videos, 1 million software programs, 15 million audio files, 4.8 million images, 255,000 concerts, and over 835 billion web pages in its Wayback Machine. Its mission is committing to provide "universal access to all knowledge".

The first-sale doctrine is an American legal concept that limits the rights of an intellectual property owner to control resale of products embodying its intellectual property. The doctrine enables the distribution chain of copyrighted products, library lending, giving, video rentals and secondary markets for copyrighted works. In trademark law, this same doctrine enables reselling of trademarked products after the trademark holder puts the products on the market. In the case of patented products, the doctrine allows resale of patented products without any control from the patent holder. The first sale doctrine does not apply to patented processes, which are instead governed by the patent exhaustion doctrine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Authors Guild</span> American professional organization

The Authors Guild is America's oldest and largest professional organization for writers and provides advocacy on issues of free expression and copyright protection. Since its founding in 1912 as the Authors League of America, it has counted among its board members notable authors of fiction, nonfiction, and poetry, including numerous winners of the Nobel and Pulitzer Prizes and National Book Awards. It has over 9,000 members, who receive free legal advice and guidance on contracts with publishers as well as insurance services and assistance with subsidiary licensing and royalties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open Library</span> Online project for book data of the Internet Archive

Open Library is an online project intended to create "one web page for every book ever published". Created by Aaron Swartz, Brewster Kahle, Alexis Rossi, Anand Chitipothu, and Rebecca Malamud, Open Library is a project of the Internet Archive, a nonprofit organization. It has been funded in part by grants from the California State Library and the Kahle/Austin Foundation. Open Library provides online digital copies in multiple formats, created from images of many public domain, out-of-print, and in-print books.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google Books</span> Service from Google

Google Books is a service from Google that searches the full text of books and magazines that Google has scanned, converted to text using optical character recognition (OCR), and stored in its digital database. Books are provided either by publishers and authors through the Google Books Partner Program, or by Google's library partners through the Library Project. Additionally, Google has partnered with a number of magazine publishers to digitize their archives.

The California Digital Library (CDL) was founded by the University of California in 1997. Under the leadership of then UC President Richard C. Atkinson, the CDL's original mission was to forge a better system for scholarly information management and improved support for teaching and research. In collaboration with the ten University of California Libraries and other partners, CDL assembled one of the world's largest digital research libraries. CDL facilitates the licensing of online materials and develops shared services used throughout the UC system. Building on the foundations of the Melvyl Catalog, CDL has developed one of the largest online library catalogs in the country and works in partnership with the UC campuses to bring the treasures of California's libraries, museums, and cultural heritage organizations to the world. CDL continues to explore how services such as digital curation, scholarly publishing, archiving and preservation support research throughout the information lifecycle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyfraud</span> False copyright claims to public-domain content

A copyfraud is a false copyright claim by an individual or institution with respect to content that is in the public domain. Such claims are unlawful, at least under US and Australian copyright law, because material that is not copyrighted is free for all to use, modify and reproduce. Copyfraud also includes overreaching claims by publishers, museums and others, as where a legitimate copyright owner knowingly, or with constructive knowledge, claims rights beyond what the law allows.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital photograph restoration</span> Restoration of photographs and other documents using digital techniques

Digital photograph restoration is the practice of restoring the appearance of a digital copy of a physical photograph that has been damaged by natural, man-made, or environmental causes, or affected by age or neglect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HathiTrust</span> Digital library

HathiTrust Digital Library is a large-scale collaborative repository of digital content from research libraries including content digitized via Google Books and the Internet Archive digitization initiatives, as well as content digitized locally by libraries.

A digital library, also called an online library, an internet library, a digital repository, a library without walls, or a digital collection, is an online database of digital objects that can include text, still images, audio, video, digital documents, or other digital media formats or a library accessible through the internet. Objects can consist of digitized content like print or photographs, as well as originally produced digital content like word processor files or social media posts. In addition to storing content, digital libraries provide means for organizing, searching, and retrieving the content contained in the collection. Digital libraries can vary immensely in size and scope, and can be maintained by individuals or organizations. The digital content may be stored locally, or accessed remotely via computer networks. These information retrieval systems are able to exchange information with each other through interoperability and sustainability.

<i>Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace</i> 1999 book by Lawrence Lessig

Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace is a 1999 book by Lawrence Lessig on the structure and nature of regulation of the Internet.

<i>Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.</i> U.S. copyright law case, 2015

Authors Guild v. Google 721 F.3d 132 was a copyright case heard in federal court for the Southern District of New York, and then the Second Circuit Court of Appeals between 2005 and 2015. It concerned fair use in copyright law and the transformation of printed copyrighted books into an online searchable database through scanning and digitization. It centered on the legality of the Google Book Search Library Partner project that had been launched in 2003.

<i>Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.</i>

Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc., 934 F. Supp. 2d 640 , is a case from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York concerning copyright infringement of digital music. In ReDigi, record label Capitol Records claimed copyright infringement against ReDigi, a service that allows resale of digital music tracks originally purchased from the iTunes Store. Capitol Records' motion for a preliminary injunction against ReDigi was denied, and oral arguments were given on October 5, 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">E-book lending</span>

E-book lending or elending is a practice in which access to already-purchased downloads or online reads of e-books is made available on a time-limited basis to others. It works around the digital rights management built into online-store-published e-books by limiting access to a purchased e-book file to the borrower, resulting in loss of access to the file by the purchaser for the duration of the borrowing period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Library Genesis</span> File-sharing website for print publications

Library Genesis (LibGen) is a file-sharing based shadow library website for scholarly journal articles, academic and general-interest books, images, comics, audiobooks, and magazines. The site enables free access to content that is otherwise paywalled or not digitized elsewhere. LibGen describes itself as a "links aggregator", providing a searchable database of items "collected from publicly available public Internet resources" as well as files uploaded "from users".

The Boston Library Consortium (BLC) is a library consortium based in the Boston area with 26 member institutions across New England.

<i>Hachette v. Internet Archive</i> 2023 American court case

Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, No. 20-cv-4160 (JGK), 2023 WL 2623787, is a case in which the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York determined that the Internet Archive committed copyright infringement by scanning and distributing copies of books online. Stemming from the creation of the National Emergency Library (NEL) during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, publishing companies Hachette Book Group, Penguin Random House, HarperCollins, and Wiley alleged that the Internet Archive's Open Library and National Emergency Library facilitated copyright infringement. The case involves the fair use of controlled digital lending (CDL) systems.

References

  1. ↑ Wu, Michelle M. (2011). "Building a Collaborative Digital Collection: A Necessary Evolution in Libraries" (PDF). Law Library Journal . 103 (4): 527–551. 2011-34. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-10-30. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  2. ↑ Bailey, Lila; Courtney, Kyle K.; Hansen, David; Minow, Mary; Schultz, Jason; Wu, Michelle (September 2018). "Position Statement on Controlled Digital Lending - Statement on Controlled Digital Lending by Libraries". Controlled Digital Lending by Libraries. Archived from the original on 2019-08-02. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  3. ↑ Hansen, David R.; Courtney, Kyle K. (2018). "A White Paper on Controlled Digital Lending of Library Books". Controlled Digital Lending by Libraries. Archived from the original on 2019-08-02. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  4. ↑ Enis, Matt. "Controlled Digital Lending Concept Gains Ground". Library Journal. Archived from the original on 2019-12-04. Retrieved 2019-12-04.
  5. ↑ Price, Gary (2019-10-16). "Controlled Digital Lending in Canada: "Protecting Unique Canadiana Works" at the Hamilton Public Library". Infodocket. Library Journal. Archived from the original on 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2019-12-05.
  6. ↑ Mounce, Ross (2018-08-20). "A new digitisation opportunity for UK university presses". Research Libraries UK. Archived from the original on 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2019-12-05.
  7. ↑ Couto, Walter Eler do; Ferreira, Sueli Mara Soares Pinto (2020-12-23). "Empréstimo Digital Controlado e direitos autorais no Brasil: algumas reflexões iniciais". Liinc em Revista. 16 (2): e5378. doi: 10.18617/liinc.v16i2.5378 .
  8. ↑ Adams, Caralee; Bailey, Lila; Freeland, Chris. "Transforming Our Libraries: 12 Stories About Controlled Digital Lending" (PDF). controlleddigitallending.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2019-12-05.
  9. ↑ Petrides, Lisa. "Why Controlled Digital Lending Matters to Schools". ISKME. Archived from the original on 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2019-12-05.
  10. ↑ "IFLA Statement on Controlled Digital Lending". IFLA. 2021-06-22. Archived from the original on 2021-06-17. Retrieved 2021-08-03.
  11. ↑ "Controlled Digital Lending: an Interview with Jonathan Band". International Federation of Library Associations. Archived from the original on 2019-12-04. Retrieved 2019-12-04.
  12. ↑ National Writers Union; et al. (2019-02-13). "FAQ on Controlled Digital Lending (CDL)". National Writers Union.
  13. ↑ McKay, John, ed. (2019-02-04). "Statement on Flawed Theory of "Controlled Digital Lending"". Association of American Publishers (AAP). Archived from the original on 2019-08-02. Retrieved 2019-08-02.
  14. ↑ "Appeal from the victims of Controlled Digital Lending (CDL)". National Writers Union. 2019-02-13. Retrieved 2019-12-04.
  15. ↑ "Publisher, Author Groups Protest Library Book Scanning Program". Publishers Weekly. Archived from the original on 2019-12-04. Retrieved 2019-12-04.
  16. ↑ Hruska, Joel. "The Authors Guild Declares War on Digital Library Lending, Libraries". ExtremeTech. Archived from the original on 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2019-12-05.
  17. 1 2 Wu, Michelle M. (2019). "Revisiting Controlled Digital Lending Post-ReDigi". First Monday . 24 (5). Retrieved 2020-02-11.
  18. ↑ Courtney, Kyle K. (2020). "Libraries Do Not Need Permission To Lend Books: Fair Use, First Sale, and the Fallacy of Licensing Culture". Medium. Archived from the original on 2021-02-11. Retrieved 2020-02-11.
  19. ↑ Hansen, David R.; Courtney, Kyle K. (2020). "Fair Use, Innovation, and Controlled Digital Lending". Fair Use Week Blog. Archived from the original on 2019-03-01. Retrieved 2020-02-11.
  20. ↑ Jay Peters, Sean Hollister (2023-03-24). "The Internet Archive has lost its first fight to scan and lend e-books like a library". The Verge. Retrieved 2023-08-05.
  21. ↑ "Publishers and Internet Archive Submit Negotiated Judgment with Permanent Injunction to District Court in Hachette Book Group, et al, v. Internet Archive". publishers.org. Association of American Publishers. Retrieved 2023-08-15.
  22. ↑ Flood, Alison (2019-01-22). "Internet Archive's ebook loans face UK copyright challenge". The Guardian. Retrieved 2023-12-26.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.