Crop wild relative

Last updated
Wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides), a CWR of cultivated wheats (Triticum spp), can be found in northern Israel. Wild emmer wheat.jpg
Wild emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccoides), a CWR of cultivated wheats (Triticum spp), can be found in northern Israel.
Two conservationists collecting indigenous knowledge on cultural practices that favour CWR populations, from a farmer near Fes, Morocco. Collecting CWR IK Morocco.jpg
Two conservationists collecting indigenous knowledge on cultural practices that favour CWR populations, from a farmer near Fes, Morocco.

A crop wild relative (CWR) is a wild plant closely related to a domesticated plant. It may be a wild ancestor of the domesticated (cultivated) plant or another closely related taxon.

Contents

Overview

The wild relatives of crop plants constitute an increasingly important resource for improving agricultural production and for maintaining sustainable agro-ecosystems. Their natural selection in the wild accumulates a rich set of useful traits that can be introduced into crop plants by crossing. [1] [2] [3] With the advent of anthropogenic climate change and greater ecosystem instability CWRs are likely to prove a critical resource in ensuring food security for the new millennium. [4] It was Nikolai Vavilov, the Russian botanist who first realized the importance of crop wild relatives in the early 20th century. [5] Genetic material from CWRs has been utilized by humans for thousands of years to improve the quality and yield of crops. Farmers have used traditional breeding methods for millennia, wild maize (Zea mexicana) is routinely grown alongside maize to promote natural crossing and improve yields. More recently, plant breeders have utilised CWR genes to improve a wide range of crops like rice (Oryza sativa), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and grain legumes. [6] [7]

CWRs have contributed many useful genes to crop plants, and modern varieties of most major crops now contain genes from their wild relatives. [8] Therefore, CWRs are wild plants related to socio-economically important species including food, fodder and forage crops, medicinal plants, condiments, ornamental, and forestry species, as well as plants used for industrial purposes, such as oils and fibres, and to which they can contribute beneficial traits. A CWR can be defined as "... a wild plant taxon that has an indirect use derived from its relatively close genetic relationship to a crop...” [9]

Conservation of crop wild relatives

Example of one of the first genetic reserves established to conserve CWRs near Kalakh al Hosn, Syria Genetic-Reserve-Syria.jpg
Example of one of the first genetic reserves established to conserve CWRs near Kalakh al Hosn, Syria

CWRs are essential components of natural and agricultural ecosystems and hence are indispensable for maintaining ecosystem health. [4] Their conservation and sustainable use is very important for improving agricultural production, increasing food security, and maintaining a healthy environment. [10] [11] [12]

Geographic hotspots of distributions of crop wild relatives not represented in genebanks Geographic hotspots of distributions of crop wild relatives not represented in genebanks.tif
Geographic hotspots of distributions of crop wild relatives not represented in genebanks

The natural populations of many CWRs are increasingly at risk. They are threatened by habitat loss through the destruction and degradation of natural environment or their conversion to other uses. Deforestation is leading to the loss of many populations of important wild relatives of fruit, nut, and industrial crops. Populations of wild relatives of cereal crops that occur in arid or semi-arid lands are being severely reduced by over grazing and resulting desertification. The growing industrialization of agriculture is drastically reducing the occurrence of CWRs within the traditional agro-ecosystems. The wise conservation and use of CWRs are essential elements for increasing food security, eliminating poverty, and maintaining the environment. [13]

Conservation strategies for CWRs often consider both in situ and ex situ conservation. [14] These are complementary approaches to CWR conservation, since each has its own advantages and disadvantages. For example, whilst ex situ conservation protects CWR (or more correctly, their genes) from threats in the wild, it can limit evolution and adaptation to new environmental challenges.

In 2016, 29% of wild relative plant species were completely missing from the world’s genebanks, with a further 24% represented by fewer than 10 samples. Over 70% of all crop wild relative species worldwide were in urgent need of further collecting to improve their representation in genebanks, and over 95% were insufficiently represented with regard to the full range of geographic and ecological variation in their native distributions. While the most critical priorities for further collecting were found in the Mediterranean and Near East, Western and Southern Europe, Southeast and East Asia, and South America, crop wild relatives insufficiently represented in genebanks are distributed across almost all countries worldwide. [14] [15]

Examples of wild relatives

Grains

Vegetables

Note: Many different vegetables share one common ancestor, particularly in the Brassica genus of plants (cruciferous vegetables). Many vegetables are also hybrids of different species, again this is particularly true of Brassicas (see e.g. triangle of U).

Fruits

Oilseeds

Pulses

Cajanus scarabaeoides is one of the closest wild relatives to the cultivated pigeonpea and has high drought tolerance and high protein content. Being screened at the campus of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics in Patancheru, India. 'Cajanus scarabaeoides' - a wild pigeonpea.jpg
Cajanus scarabaeoides is one of the closest wild relatives to the cultivated pigeonpea and has high drought tolerance and high protein content. Being screened at the campus of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics in Patancheru, India.

Forages

Tubers

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Vicia sativa</i> Plant species in the family

Vicia sativa, known as the common vetch, garden vetch, tare or simply vetch, is a nitrogen-fixing leguminous plant in the family Fabaceae. It is now naturalised throughout the world occurring on every continent, except Antarctica and the Arctic. The centre of diversity is thought to be the Fertile Crescent, although gold standard molecular confirmation is currently not available.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Root vegetable</span> Plant root used as a vegetable

Root vegetables are underground plant parts eaten by humans as food. In agricultural and culinary terminology, the term applies to true roots such as taproots and tuberous roots as well as non-roots such as bulbs, corms, rhizomes, and stem tubers.

<i>Vigna</i> Genus of plants

Vigna is a genus of plants in the legume family, Fabaceae, with a pantropical distribution. It includes some well-known cultivated species, including many types of beans. Some are former members of the genus Phaseolus. According to Hortus Third, Vigna differs from Phaseolus in biochemistry and pollen structure, and in details of the style and stipules.

Northern root-knot nematode is a species of vegetable pathogens which produces tiny galls on around 550 crop and weed species. They invade root tissue after birth. Females are able to lay up to 1,000 eggs at a time in a large egg mass. By surviving harsh winters, they can survive in cold climates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leaf vegetable</span> Plant leaves eaten as a vegetable

Leaf vegetables, also called leafy greens, pot herbs, vegetable greens, or simply greens, are plant leaves eaten as a vegetable, sometimes accompanied by tender petioles and shoots. Leaf vegetables eaten raw in a salad can be called salad greens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Verticillium wilt</span> Fungal disease of flowering plants

Verticillium wilt is a wilt disease affecting over 350 species of eudicot plants. It is caused by six species of Verticillium fungi: V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum, V. longisporum, V. nubilum, V. theobromae and V. tricorpus. Many economically important plants are susceptible including cotton, tomatoes, potatoes, oilseed rape, eggplants, peppers and ornamentals, as well as others in natural vegetation communities. Many eudicot species and cultivars are resistant to the disease and all monocots, gymnosperms and ferns are immune.

Tomato black ring virus (TBRV) is a plant pathogenic virus of the family Secoviridae, that was first discovered in 1946.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neglected and underutilized crop</span>

Neglected and underutilised crops are domesticated plant species used for food, medicine, trading, or cultural practices within local communities but not widely commodified or studied as part of mainstream agriculture. Such crops may be in declining production. They are considered underutilised in scientific inquiry for their perceived potential to contribute to knowledge regarding nutrition, food security, genetic resistance, or sustainability. Other terms to describe such crops include minor, orphan, underused, local, traditional, alternative, minor, niche, or underdeveloped.

<i>Agrotis gladiaria</i> Species of moth

Agrotis gladiaria, the swordsman dart or claybacked cutworm, is a moth of the family Noctuidae. It is found in south-eastern Canada from Nova Scotia to Ontario and in the United States from Maine to the panhandle of Florida, west to eastern Texas, eastern Kansas, eastern Nebraska, southern Wisconsin and Michigan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flora of Lebanon</span>

The flora of Lebanon includes approximately 2,600 plant species. Situated on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Basin, Lebanon is a reservoir of plant diversity and one of the world's biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Endemic species constitute 12% of the Lebanese flora; 221 plant species are broad endemics and 90 are narrow endemics. Important Plant Areas (IPAs) featuring the country exceptional botanical richness were defined in 2018.

The Future 50 Foods report, subtitled "50 foods for healthier people and a healthier planet", was published in February 2019 by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and Knorr. It identifies 50 plant-based foods that can increase dietary nutritional value and reduce environmental impacts of the food supply, promoting sustainable global food systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Kresovich</span>

Stephen Kresovich is a plant geneticist and the Coker Endowed Chair of Genetics in the Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences at Clemson University and professor in the School of Integrative Plant Science in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Cornell University. Since 2019 he has served as director of the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Crop Improvement.

The agricultural weed syndrome is the set of common traits which make a plant a successful agricultural weed. Most of these traits are not, themselves, phenotypes but are instead methods of rapid adaptation. So equipped, plants of various origins - invasives, natives, mildly successful marginal weeds of agriculture, weeds of other settings - accumulate other characteristics which allow them to compete in an environment with a high degree of human management.

<i>Brassica rupestris</i> Species of plant in the family Brassicaceae

Brassica rupestris is a species of flowering plant in the family Brassicaceae, native to southwestern Italy and Sicily. The plant is known to grow on vertical limestone cliffs. In the past it was proposed, based on morphology, that Brassica rupestris contributed to the ancestry of either kale or kohlrabi, but DNA evidence shows that it did not.

References

  1. Bioversity International, (2006). Crop wild relatives. Bioversity International, Rome.
  2. FAO, (1998). The State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome
  3. FAO, (2008). Establishment of a global network for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and needs. FAO, Rome
  4. 1 2 Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP (2008). "Crop wild relatives: establishing the context.". In Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Iriondo J, Dulloo E, Turok J (eds.). Crop Wild Relative Conservation and Use. Wallingford: CABI Publishing. pp. 3–30.
  5. Vavilov NI (1926). Studies in the origin of cultivated plants. Leningrad: Institute of Applied Botany and Plant Breeding.
  6. Hajjar R, Hodgkin T (2007). "The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years". Euphytica. 156 (1–2): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0. S2CID   36269581.
  7. Bohra, Abhishek; Kilian, Benjamin; Sivasankar, Shoba; Caccamo, Mario; Mba, Chikelu; McCouch, Susan R.; Varshney, Rajeev K. (2022-04-01). "Reap the crop wild relatives for breeding future crops". Trends in Biotechnology. 40 (4): 412–431. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.08.009 . ISSN   0167-7799. PMID   34629170. S2CID   238580339.
  8. Dempewolf H, Baute G, Anderson J, Kilian B, Smith C, Guarino L (2017-05-06). "Past and Future Use of Wild Relatives in Crop Breeding". Crop Science. 57 (3): 1070–1082. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0885 . ISSN   0011-183X.
  9. Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jury SL, Kell SP, Scholten MA (2006). "Towards a definition of a crop wild relative". Biodiversity and Conservation. 15 (8): 2673–2685. Bibcode:2006BiCon..15.2673M. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-5409-6. S2CID   26885014.
  10. Hawkes JG, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV (2000). The ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 1–250.
  11. Heywood VH, Dulloo ME (2006). "In Situ Conservation of Wild Plant Species – a Critical Global Review of Good Practices. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 11. IPGRI, Rome".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. Meilleur BA, Hodgkin T (2004). "In situ conservation of crop wild relatives: Status and trends". Biodiversity and Conservation. 13 (4): 663–684. Bibcode:2004BiCon..13..663M. doi:10.1023/b:bioc.0000011719.03230.17. S2CID   3064850.
  13. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (August 1997). "Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild". Science. 277 (5329): 1063–6. doi:10.1126/science.277.5329.1063. PMID   9262467.
  14. 1 2 Taylor NG, Kell SP, Holubec V, Parra-Quijano M, Maxted N (2017). "A systematic conservation strategy for crop wild relatives in the Czech Republic" (PDF). Diversity and Distributions. 23 (4): 448–462. Bibcode:2017DivDi..23..448T. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12539 .
  15. Castañeda-Álvarez, Nora P.; Khoury, Colin K.; Achicanoy, Harold A.; Bernau, Vivian; Dempewolf, Hannes; Eastwood, Ruth J.; Guarino, Luigi; Harker, Ruth H.; Jarvis, Andy; Maxted, Nigel; Müller, Jonas V. (2016-03-21). "Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives". Nature Plants. 2 (4): 16022. doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.22. ISSN   2055-0278. PMID   27249561. S2CID   7174536.
  16. Dida, Mathews M.; Oduori, Chrispus A.; Manthi, Samuel J.; Avosa, Millicent O.; Mikwa, Erick O.; Ojulong, Henry F.; Odeny, Damaris A. (2021). "Novel sources of resistance to blast disease in finger millet". Crop Science. 61 (1): 250–262. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20378 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   225135026.
  17. Rehman, Sajid; Amouzoune, Mariam; Hiddar, Houda; Aberkane, Hafid; Benkirane, Rachid; Filali-Maltouf, Abdelkarim; Al-Jaboobi, Muamar; Acqbouch, Leila; Tsivelikas, Athanasios; Verma, Ramesh Pal Singh; Kehel, Zakaria (2021). "Traits discovery in Hordeum vulgare sbsp. spontaneum accessions and in lines derived from interspecific crosses with wild Hordeum species for enhancing barley breeding efforts". Crop Science. 61 (1): 219–233. doi:10.1002/csc2.20360. ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   225167970.
  18. Tin, Huynh Quang; Loi, Nguyen Huu; Labarosa, Sandy Jan E.; McNally, Kenneth L.; McCouch, Susan; Kilian, Benjamin (2021). "Phenotypic response of farmer-selected CWR-derived rice lines to salt stress in the Mekong Delta". Crop Science. 61 (1): 201–218. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20354 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   229546947.
  19. Sharma, Shivali; Sharma, Rajan; Govindaraj, Mahalingam; Mahala, Rajendra Singh; Satyavathi, C. Tara; Srivastava, Rakesh K.; Gumma, Murali Krishna; Kilian, Benjamin (2021). "Harnessing wild relatives of pearl millet for germplasm enhancement: Challenges and opportunities". Crop Science. 61 (1): 177–200. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20343 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   224875047.
  20. Ochieng, Grace; Ngugi, Kahiu; Wamalwa, Lydia N.; Manyasa, Eric; Muchira, Nicoleta; Nyamongo, Desterio; Odeny, Damaris A. (2021). "Novel sources of drought tolerance from landraces and wild sorghum relatives". Crop Science. 61 (1): 104–118. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20300 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   225470264.
  21. Simon, Philipp W.; Rolling, William R.; Senalik, Douglas; Bolton, Adam L.; Rahim, M. A.; Mannan, A. T. M. Majharul; Islam, Ferdouse; Ali, A.; Nijabat, A.; Naveed, Naima Huma; Hussain, Rameez (2021). "Wild carrot diversity for new sources of abiotic stress tolerance to strengthen vegetable breeding in Bangladesh and Pakistan". Crop Science. 61 (1): 163–176. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20333 . ISSN   1435-0653.
  22. Eyland, David; Breton, Catherine; Sardos, Julie; Kallow, Simon; Panis, Bart; Swennen, Rony; Paofa, Janet; Tardieu, François; Welcker, Claude; Janssens, Steven B.; Carpentier, Sebastien C. (2021). "Filling the gaps in gene banks: Collecting, characterizing, and phenotyping wild banana relatives of Papua New Guinea". Crop Science. 61 (1): 137–149. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20320 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   225195460.
  23. Kouassi, Abou Bakari; Kouassi, Koffi Brice Aymar; Sylla, Zakaria; Plazas, Mariola; Fonseka, Ramya Malkanthi; Kouassi, Auguste; Fonseka, Hemal; N'guetta, Assanvo Simon-Pierre; Prohens, Jaime (2021). "Genetic parameters of drought tolerance for agromorphological traits in eggplant, wild relatives, and interspecific hybrids". Crop Science. 61 (1): 55–68. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20250 . hdl: 10251/196627 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   225378001.
  24. Abdallah, Fadoua; Kumar, Shiv; Amri, Ahmed; Mentag, Rachid; Kehel, Zakaria; Mejri, Rajia Kchaou; Triqui, Zine El Abidine; Hejjaoui, Kamal; Baum, Michael; Amri, Moez (2021). "Wild Lathyrus species as a great source of resistance for introgression into cultivated grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) against broomrape weeds (Orobanche crenata Forsk. and Orobanche foetida Poir.)". Crop Science. 61 (1): 263–276. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20399 . ISSN   1435-0653.
  25. Khoury, Colin K.; Castañeda-Alvarez, Nora P.; Achicanoy, Harold A.; Sosa, Chrystian C.; Bernau, Vivian; Kassa, Mulualem T.; Norton, Sally L.; van der Maesen, L. Jos G.; Upadhyaya, Hari D.; Ramírez-Villegas, Julian; Jarvis, Andy (2015-04-01). "Crop wild relatives of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]: Distributions, ex situ conservation status, and potential genetic resources for abiotic stress tolerance". Biological Conservation. 184: 259–270. Bibcode:2015BCons.184..259K. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.032 . ISSN   0006-3207.
  26. Sharma, Shivali; Lavale, Shivaji Ajinath; Nimje, Chetna; Singh, Sube (2021). "Characterization and identification of annual wild Cicer species for seed protein and mineral concentrations for chickpea improvement". Crop Science. 61 (1): 305–319. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20413 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   233360422.
  27. Humphries, Alan W.; Ovalle, Carlos; Hughes, Steve; Pozo, Alejandro del; Inostroza, Luis; Barahona, Viviana; Yu, Linqing; Yerzhanova, Sakysh; Rowe, Trevor; Hill, Jeff; Meiirman, Galiolla (2021). "Characterization and pre-breeding of diverse alfalfa wild relatives originating from drought-stressed environments". Crop Science. 61 (1): 69–88. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20274 . ISSN   1435-0653.
  28. Nhanala, Stella E. C.; Yencho, G. Craig (2021). "Assessment of the potential of wild Ipomoea spp. for the improvement of drought tolerance in cultivated sweetpotato Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam". Crop Science. 61 (1): 234–249. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20363 . ISSN   1435-0653. S2CID   224985206.