Failures of water supply and sanitation systems

Last updated

Destroyed water supply pipes in Kariba, Zimbabwe Destroyed water and sewer pipes by elephants in Kariba (6910364259).jpg
Destroyed water supply pipes in Kariba, Zimbabwe

Failures of water supply and sanitation systems describe situations where water supply and sanitation systems (also called WASH systems) have been put in place (for example by the government or by non-government organizations (NGOs) but have failed to meet the expected outcomes. Low resource settings are scattered with the artifacts of WASH projects - include tanks, taps, toilets and pipes - from the period when WASH was predominantly considered a problem of infrastructure, engineering and technology. [1] These failures not only represent a massive loss of investment of donor and community members’ resources, their creation persists, with non-functionality of water systems remaining at 30%–40%. [1]

Contents

This level of failure represents a total investment of between USD 1.2 and USD 1.5 billion in the last 20 years (as of 2010). [2]

These failures often due to poor planning, lack of choice of appropriate technology depending upon the context, insufficient stakeholder involvement at the various stages of the project, and/or lack of maintenance. Some argue they are due in part to a lack of accountability for these failures. [3]

While Hygiene Behavior Change is important in achieving the health benefits of improved WASH systems, the achievement of sustainability of WASH infrastructure depends on the creation of demand for sanitation services. [4] [5]

National government mapping and monitoring efforts as well as post-project monitoring by NGOs or researchers, have identified the failure of water supply systems (also known as water points, wells, boreholes, or similar) and sanitation systems (one part of sanitation systems are the toilets). The following sections provide examples of those failures sorted by country.

Improved Sources Don't Guarantee Water Quality

A review of 319 studies reporting on the quality of 96,737 water samples found that overall, the chance of contamination were considerably lower for “improved” sources than “unimproved” sources. [6] However, in 38% of 191 studies, over a quarter of samples from improved sources contained fecal contamination. [6] In particular, samples from protected dug wells often contained fecal contamination. [6] The researchers also found that water sources in low-income countries and rural areas were more likely to be contaminated. [6] These researchers concluded that access to an “improved source” does not ensure water is free of fecal contamination. [6] "International estimates therefore greatly overstate use of safe drinking-water and do not fully reflect disparities in access." [6]

For example, a national sampling of drinking water points in Ethiopia found that 28% were not in compliance with the WHO guideline value for fecal contamination nor the Ethiopian drinking-water standard ES 261:2001. [7]  Non-compliance ranged from 57% for protected springs to 12% for utility piped supplies. [7]  In 135 Ugandan households, 86% of initially clean water samples contained E. coli after 24 hours of storage in jerrycans. [8]  

Monitoring

Some national and local governments monitor water services regularly. One example is the Sistema de Información de Agua y Saneamiento Rural (Rural Water and Sanitation Information System) [9] a monitoring system in Honduras and Nicaragua.

For organizations that work on WASH interventions, monitoring means using indicators to measure effectiveness of a development program. Some organizations or research organizations do "post-implementation monitoring", which occurs after the WASH intervention has been completed.[ citation needed ]

The Water Point Data Exchange (WPDx), [10] launched in 2015, is a global platform for sharing water point data collected by governments, non-profit organizations, researchers, and others.

Failures of water supply systems

Afghanistan

Africa / Sub-Saharan Africa

Angola

Bangladesh

Belarus

Benin

Bolivia

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cambodia

Cameroon

Central African Republic

Chad

Congo

Cóte d'Ivoire

Croatia

Czech Republic

Dominican Republic

DR Congo

Ecuador

England & Wales

Eritrea

Eswatini (formerly Swaziland)

Ethiopia

Gabon

Germany

Ghana

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Haiti

India

Kenya

Kiribati

Laos

Liberia

Macedonia

Madagascar

Malawi

Mali

Mauritania

Mozambique

Multiple countries

Namibia

Nepal

Niger

Nigeria

Pakistan

Peru

Philippines

Rwanda

Scotland

Senegal

Sierra Leone

South Africa

South Asia

South Sudan

Sudan

Tanzania

Timor-Leste

A borehole in Rwebisengo, Uganda located far from households. This may lead to failure. Rwebisengo - Flickr - Dave Proffer (6).jpg
A borehole in Rwebisengo, Uganda located far from households. This may lead to failure.

Togo

Uganda

Vanuatu

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Failures of sanitation systems

Global

Afghanistan

Bangladesh

Cambodia

China

Ethiopia, Kenya, Sierra Leone, Uganda

Collapsed pit latrine block around Narok, Kenya, where unlined pit latrines easily collapse in the sandy and instable soil after heavy rainfalls Collapsed pit latrine block around Narok, Kenya (5919305485).jpg
Collapsed pit latrine block around Narok, Kenya, where unlined pit latrines easily collapse in the sandy and instable soil after heavy rainfalls

Haiti

India

Madagascar

South Africa

Zambia

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sanitation</span> Public health conditions related to clean water and proper excreta and sewage disposal

Sanitation refers to public health conditions related to clean drinking water and treatment and disposal of human excreta and sewage. Preventing human contact with feces is part of sanitation, as is hand washing with soap. Sanitation systems aim to protect human health by providing a clean environment that will stop the transmission of disease, especially through the fecal–oral route. For example, diarrhea, a main cause of malnutrition and stunted growth in children, can be reduced through adequate sanitation. There are many other diseases which are easily transmitted in communities that have low levels of sanitation, such as ascariasis, cholera, hepatitis, polio, schistosomiasis, and trachoma, to name just a few.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WaterAid</span> International NGO, focused on water, sanitation and hygiene

WaterAid is an international non-governmental organization, focused on water, sanitation and hygiene. It was set up in 1981 as a response to the UN International Drinking Water decade (1981–1990). As of 2018, it was operating in 34 countries.

Human waste refers to the waste products of the human digestive system, menses, and human metabolism including urine and feces. As part of a sanitation system that is in place, human waste is collected, transported, treated and disposed of or reused by one method or another, depending on the type of toilet being used, ability by the users to pay for services and other factors. Fecal sludge management is used to deal with fecal matter collected in on-site sanitation systems such as pit latrines and septic tanks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pit latrine</span> Toilet that collects human waste in a hole in the ground

A pit latrine, also known as pit toilet, is a type of toilet that collects human waste in a hole in the ground. Urine and feces enter the pit through a drop hole in the floor, which might be connected to a toilet seat or squatting pan for user comfort. Pit latrines can be built to function without water or they can have a water seal. When properly built and maintained, pit latrines can decrease the spread of disease by reducing the amount of human feces in the environment from open defecation. This decreases the transfer of pathogens between feces and food by flies. These pathogens are major causes of infectious diarrhea and intestinal worm infections. Infectious diarrhea resulted in about 700,000 deaths in children under five years old in 2011 and 250 million lost school days. Pit latrines are a low-cost method of separating feces from people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecological sanitation</span> Approach to sanitation provision which aims to safely reuse excreta in agriculture

Ecological sanitation, commonly abbreviated as ecosan, is an approach to sanitation provision which aims to safely reuse excreta in agriculture. It is an approach, rather than a technology or a device which is characterized by a desire to "close the loop", mainly for the nutrients and organic matter between sanitation and agriculture in a safe manner. One of the aims is to minimise the use of non-renewable resources. When properly designed and operated, ecosan systems provide a hygienically safe system to convert human excreta into nutrients to be returned to the soil, and water to be returned to the land. Ecosan is also called resource-oriented sanitation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community-led total sanitation</span> Approach to improve sanitation and hygiene practices, mainly in developing countries

Community-led total sanitation (CLTS): is an approach used mainly in developing countries to improve sanitation and hygiene practices in a community. The approach tries to achieve behaviour change in mainly rural people by a process of "triggering", leading to spontaneous and long-term abandonment of open defecation practices. It focuses on spontaneous and long-lasting behaviour change of an entire community. The term "triggering" is central to the CLTS process: it refers to ways of igniting community interest in ending open defecation, usually by building simple toilets, such as pit latrines. CLTS involves actions leading to increased self-respect and pride in one's community. It also involves shame and disgust about one's own open defecation behaviours. CLTS takes an approach to rural sanitation that works without hardware subsidies and that facilitates communities to recognize the problem of open defecation and take collective action to clean up and become "open defecation free".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Ethiopia</span>

Access to water supply and sanitation in Ethiopia is amongst the lowest in Sub-Saharan Africa and the entire world. While access has increased substantially with funding from foreign aid, much still remains to be done. Some factors inhibiting the achievement of these goals are the limited capacity of water bureaus in the country's nine regions, two city administrations and water desks in the 770 districts of Ethiopia (woredas); insufficient cost recovery for proper operation and maintenance; and different policies and procedures used by various donors, notwithstanding the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable sanitation</span> Sanitation system designed to meet certain criteria and to work well over the long-term

Sustainable sanitation is a sanitation system designed to meet certain criteria and to work well over the long-term. Sustainable sanitation systems consider the entire "sanitation value chain", from the experience of the user, excreta and wastewater collection methods, transportation or conveyance of waste, treatment, and reuse or disposal. The Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) includes five features in its definition of "sustainable sanitation": Systems need to be economically and socially acceptable, technically and institutionally appropriate and protect the environment and natural resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Rwanda</span>

Water supply and sanitation in Rwanda is characterized by a clear government policy and significant donor support. In response to poor sustainability of rural water systems and poor service quality, in 2002 local government in the Northern Byumba Province contracted out service provision to the local private sector in a form of public–private partnership. Support for public-private partnerships became a government policy in 2004 and locally initiated public-private partnerships spread rapidly, covering 25% of rural water systems as of 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Ghana</span>

The water supply and sanitation sector in Ghana is a sector that is in charge of the supply of healthy water and also improves the sanitation of water bodies in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania</span>

Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania is characterised by: decreasing access to at least basic water sources in the 2000s, steady access to some form of sanitation, intermittent water supply and generally low quality of service. Many utilities are barely able to cover their operation and maintenance costs through revenues due to low tariffs and poor efficiency. There are significant regional differences and the best performing utilities are Arusha and Tanga.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WASH</span> Water, sanitation and hygiene services

WASH is a sector in development cooperation, or within local governments, that provides water, sanitation, and hygiene services to communities. The main purposes of providing access to WASH services are: achieve public health gains, implement the human right to water and sanitation, reduce the burden of collecting drinking water for women, and improve education and health outcomes at schools and health facilities. Access to WASH services is an important component of water security. Universal, affordable, and sustainable access to WASH is a key issue within international development, and is the focus of the first two targets of Sustainable Development Goal 6. Targets 6.1 and 6.2 aim for equitable and accessible water and sanitation for all. In 2017, it was estimated that 2.3 billion people live without basic sanitation facilities, and 844 million people live without access to safe and clean drinking water. The acronym WASH is used widely by non-governmental organizations and aid agencies in developing countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Nigeria</span>

Responsibility of water supply in Nigeria is shared between three (3) levels of government – federal, state and local. The federal government is in charge of water resources management; state governments have the primary responsibility for urban water supply; and local governments together with communities are responsible for rural water supply. The responsibility for sanitation is not clearly defined.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open defecation</span> Humans defecating outside (in the open environment) rather than into a toilet

Open defecation is the human practice of defecating outside rather than into a toilet. People may choose fields, bushes, forests, ditches, streets, canals, or other open spaces for defecation. They do so either because they do not have a toilet readily accessible or due to archaic traditional cultural practices. The practice is common where sanitation infrastructure and services are not available. Even if toilets are available, behavior change efforts may still be needed to promote the use of toilets. 'Open defecation free' (ODF) is a term used to describe communities that have shifted to using toilets instead of open defecation. This can happen, for example, after community-led total sanitation programs have been implemented.

Water supply and sanitation in Zimbabwe is defined by many small scale successful programs but also by a general lack of improved water and sanitation systems for the majority of Zimbabwe. Water supply and sanitation in Zimbabwe faces significant challenges, marked by both successful localized efforts and widespread deficiencies in infrastructure. According to the 2019 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), conducted by UNICEF, disparities persist in access to clean drinking water and sanitation facilities. While overall access to improved drinking water sources increased to 77.1% in 2019 from 76.1% in 2014, significant gaps remain between urban and rural areas, as well as within urban centers. For instance, 97.3% of urban households have access to improved water sources compared to only 67.9% of rural households. Similarly, disparities exist across regions, with Harare boasting the highest access at 96.6%, contrasting sharply with 64.8% in Matabeleland South. Additionally, approximately 67.8% of households have access to improved, non-shared sanitation facilities, indicating ongoing challenges in this domain. Urban areas, in particular, grapple with chronic water shortages amid rising consumption demands. There are many factors which continue to determine the nature, for the foreseeable future, of water supply and sanitation in Zimbabwe. Three major factors are the severely depressed state of the Zimbabwean economy, the willingness of foreign aid organizations to build and finance infrastructure projects, and the political stability of the Zimbabwean state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urine-diverting dry toilet</span> Dry toilet with separate collection of feces and urine without any flush water

A urine-diverting dry toilet (UDDT) is a type of dry toilet with urine diversion that can be used to provide safe, affordable sanitation in a variety of contexts worldwide. The separate collection of feces and urine without any flush water has many advantages, such as odor-free operation and pathogen reduction by drying. While dried feces and urine harvested from UDDTs can be and routinely are used in agriculture, many UDDT installations do not apply any sort of recovery scheme. The UDDT is an example of a technology that can be used to achieve a sustainable sanitation system. This dry excreta management system is an alternative to pit latrines and flush toilets, especially where water is scarce, a connection to a sewer system and centralized wastewater treatment plant is not feasible or desired, fertilizer and soil conditioner are needed for agriculture, or groundwater pollution should be minimized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-supply of water and sanitation</span> Incremental improvements to water and sanitation services, mainly financed by the user

Self-supply of water and sanitation refers to an approach of incremental improvements to water and sanitation services, which are mainly financed by the user. People around the world have been using this approach over centuries to incrementally upgrade their water and sanitation services. The approach does not refer to a specific technology or type of water source or sanitation service although it does have to be feasible to use and construct at a low cost and mostly using tools locally available. The approach is rather about an incremental improvement of these services. It is a market-based approach and commonly does not involve product subsidies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emergency sanitation</span> Management and technical processes required to provide sanitation in emergency situations

Emergency sanitation is the management and technical processes required to provide sanitation in emergency situations. Emergency sanitation is required during humanitarian relief operations for refugees, people affected by natural disasters and internally displaced persons. There are three phases of emergency response: Immediate, short term and long term. In the immediate phase, the focus is on managing open defecation, and toilet technologies might include very basic latrines, pit latrines, bucket toilets, container-based toilets, chemical toilets. The short term phase might also involve technologies such as urine-diverting dry toilets, septic tanks, decentralized wastewater systems. Providing handwashing facilities and management of fecal sludge are also part of emergency sanitation.

Lesotho is a mountainous and fairly 'water-rich country', but suffers from a lack of clean drinking water due to inadequate sanitation. In recent decades, with the construction of dams for the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP), Lesotho has become the main provider of water to parts of northern South Africa. Despite the economic and infrastructure development occasioned by the LHWP, waterborne diseases are common in the country and the infant mortality rate from them is high. In 2017, a project to improve the rural water supply in the Lesotho Lowlands was funded by the Global Environment Facility and the African Development Bank, and is ongoing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural Water Supply Network</span>

The Rural Water Supply Network (RWSN) is a global, multi-stakeholder network focused on achieving universal access to safe, affordable drinking water for all rural people worldwide. Established in 1992 as the Handpump Technology Network (HTN), the organization originally concentrated on the development and maintenance of handpump technologies. Over time, it expanded its scope to address broader rural water supply issues, and in 2004, it was rebranded as RWSN. The network has no legal structure and instead is a loose collaboration.

References

  1. 1 2 Neely, Kate; Valcourt, Nicholas (January 2024). "Review of systems thinking in rural WASH programming and research". Cambridge Prisms: Water. 2: e12. doi:10.1017/wat.2024.12. ISSN   2755-1776.
  2. 1 2 RWSN Executive Steering Committee (2010). Myths of the Rural Water Supply Sector: RWSN Perspective No 4. St Gallen, Switzerland: RWSN.
  3. "Accountability in WASH: Explaining the concept". www.unicef.org. Archived from the original on 2024-02-24. Retrieved 2024-12-11.
  4. Abellán, Javier; Alonso, José Antonio (2022). "Promoting global access to water and sanitation: A supply and demand perspective". Water Resources and Economics. 38: 100194. Bibcode:2022WRE....3800194A. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2022.100194. S2CID   246261266.
  5. Jenkins, M; Pfeiffer, V; Etienne, J (2009). Papers from Session 1 - 4 at the Financing Sanitation Symposium. Financing Sanitation Symposium. Frankfurt, German: KfW.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bain, Robert; Cronk, Ryan; Wright, Jim; Yang, Hong; Slaymaker, Tom; Bartram, Jamie (2014-05-06). "Fecal Contamination of Drinking-Water in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". PLOS Medicine. 11 (5): e1001644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001644 . ISSN   1549-1676. PMC   4011876 . PMID   24800926.
  7. 1 2 RAPID ASSESSMENT OF DRINKINGWATER QUALITY IN THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA
  8. Gärtner, Nicola; Germann, Laura; Wanyama, Kennedy; Ouma, Henry; Meierhofer, Regula (2021-01-01). "Keeping water from kiosks clean: Strategies for reducing recontamination during transport and storage in Eastern Uganda". Water Research X. 10: 100079. Bibcode:2021WRX....1000079G. doi:10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100079. ISSN   2589-9147. PMC   7750645 . PMID   33364593.
  9. "SISTEMA DE INFORMACIÓN DE AGUA Y SANEAMIENTO RURAL". SIASAR. Governments of Panamá, Honduras and Nicaragua. Archived from the original on 10 July 2015. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  10. "Water Point Data Exchange". WPDx Working Group.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Foster, Tim; Furey, Sean; Banks, Brian; Willetts, Juliet (2020-09-02). "Functionality of handpump water supplies: a review of data from sub-Saharan Africa and the Asia-Pacific region". International Journal of Water Resources Development. 36 (5): 855–869. Bibcode:2020IJWRD..36..855F. doi:10.1080/07900627.2018.1543117. ISSN   0790-0627.
  12. Vijselaar, Leendert; Clark, Keryn; Rivera, Javier; Estrada, Eric (29 October 2014). "National monitoring of Rural Water Supplies". Vimeo. WaterAid-IRC-RWSN. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  13. "State-of-the-art in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka WASH for School Children Provisional Draft" (PDF). UNICEF. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
  14. European Court of Auditors (2012). European Union development assistance for drinking water supply and basic sanitation in Sub-Saharan countries – Community finance – EU Bookshop. Publications Office. doi:10.2865/10664. ISBN   9789292378264.
  15. Triple-S (2009). Triple-S Briefing: Providing Reliable Rural Water Services That Last (PDF). IRC Water and Sanitation Centre. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
  16. Sutton, Sally (2005). "The sub-Saharan potential for household level water supply improvement" (PDF). Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  17. Sutton (2004). "Preliminary Desk Study of Potential for Self Supply in Sub-Saharan Africa" . Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  18. "Situation Analysis of Arsenic Mitigation 2009". Academia. Government of Bangladesh. 2009. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  19. 1 2 3 4 World Health Organization (2011). "Small-scale water supplies in the pan-European region" (PDF). Retrieved 23 July 2015.
  20. Fogelberg, Kate (2013). "From adopt-a-project to permanent services: The evolution of Water For People's approach to rural water supply in Bolivia" . Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  21. SNV Cambodia (3 April 2014). "Results are in: mapping the water supply in Chum Kiri". SNV World. SNV. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  22. Dominguez-Torres, Foster, Carolina, Vivien (1 June 2011). "The Central African Republic's Infrastructure : A Continental Perspective". World Bank. Policy Research Working Papers. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-5697. hdl: 10986/27262 . Retrieved 6 August 2015.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. Eau Potable en Cote d'Ivore: Le Sous-Secteur de L'Hydraulique Rurale
  24. 1 2 3 "Small-scale water supplies in the pan-European region" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2011. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  25. Schweitzer, Ryan; Mihelcic, James (2012). "Assessing sustainability of community management of rural water systems in the developing world" . Retrieved 23 July 2015.
  26. Hambadiahana & Tolsma (2012). Water Point Mapping in DR Congo.
  27. "Functionality: The challenge to sustain rural water supply services" (PDF). SNV. 2013.
  28. "CRITERIOS Y ACCIONES PARA EL CUMPLIMIENTO DE LAS METAS DEL MILENIO EN AGUA Y SANEAMIENTO" (PDF). OAS. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  29. Water Resources Department; Ministry of Land, Water and Environment (March 13, 2007). "Rapid Assessment of Rural Water Supply & Sanitation in Eritrea" (PDF). Retrieved November 12, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. Water & Sanitation Point Mapping Pilot Project Report 2012 (PDF). Government of the Kingdom of Swaziland Ministry of Natural Resources & Energy. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
  31. Rural Water Supply Board (PDF). in Nkambule and Peter, 2012: Government of Swaziland. 2005.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  32. Welle, Katharina; Williams, Jennifer (1 January 2014). "Monitoring and addressing governance factors affecting rural water supply sustainability" (PDF). GWI West Africa. CARE. p. 20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 July 2015. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  33. Beyene. "FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUSTAINAB ILITY OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS: THE CASE OF MECHA WO REDA, AMHARA REGION, ETHIOPIA" (PDF). Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  34. Debela, Tamene (April 2013). "Monitoring Water Supplies and Sanitation in Ethiopia". National WASH Inventory Office (NWI). Retrieved 23 July 2015.
  35. Stawicki, Stephanie (2012). "Assessing Water Scheme Functionality and Governance in South Gondar, Ethiopia" (PDF). Retrieved 23 July 2015.
  36. Calow, Ludi, and Tucker (2013). "Achieving Water Security: Lessons from research in water supply, sanitation and hygiene in Ethiopia" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 7 August 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. 1 2 Deneke, Hawassa, Israel, Habtamu (March 2008). "The Sustainability of Water Supply Schemes A case study in Mirab Abaya woreda" (PDF). Research-inspired Policy and Practice Learning in Ethiopia and the Nile region (Ripple). Retrieved 13 August 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  38. Nassef, Belayhun, Magda, Mulugeta (2012). "Water Development in Ethiopia's Pastoral Areas" (PDF). USAID. Retrieved 15 August 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  39. 1 2 "| Human Development Reports" (PDF). hdr.undp.org. January 2006. Retrieved 2015-08-15.
  40. World Vision US (2 September 2014). "The Key to Drilling Wells with Staying Power in the Developing World". PR Newswire. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  41. Ampadu-Boakye, Joseph; Hebert, Ryan (9 March 2014). "Cluster Management in Ghana" (PDF). Safe Water Network. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  42. Samani, Destina, Destina; Apoya, Patrick (October 2013). "Sustainable Water Service Delivery Project: Study Findings" (PDF). 2013 Water and Health Conference. Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
  43. Adank. "1 Fact Sheet Water services in 3 Districts in Ghana" (PDF). Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  44. "GHANA WATER COMPANY LIMITED – GWCL". www.gwcl.com.gh. Archived from the original on 2015-05-06. Retrieved 2015-08-16.
  45. Blanc, Othale; Bertrand, Fabienne; François, Réginald. "Institutional strengthening and data reporting on key WASH indicators in rural Haiti" (PDF). Retrieved 22 July 2015.[ permanent dead link ]
  46. "Wòch nan soley: The denial of the right to water in Haiti". Health and Human Rights. 9 September 2013. Retrieved 2015-08-15.
  47. Harris, Benjamin. "Understanding water services in India, house by house". IRCWASH. IRC. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  48. Ray, I., 2004, in Zwane & Kremer, 2007. “Water for all? Peri-urban and rural water delivery options: The case of India.” Presentation: UC Berkeley Energy and Resources Group Fall Colloquium Series, 6 October.
  49. "External evaluation of O&M of AP I schemes 16 June to 22 August 1989 : summary findings and recommendations :: IRC". www.ircwash.org. 1990. Retrieved 2015-08-16.
  50. "Resources – RWSN". www.rural-water-supply.net. Retrieved 2015-08-16.
  51. February 2019, Anthony Langat // 14 (2019-02-14). "When public restrooms fail, rent them out as churches?". Devex. Retrieved 2024-12-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  52. "Water Point Functionality Mapping" (PDF). SNV. 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
  53. Behrens-Shah, Priya; Welterhungerhilfe (2011). "Sustainability of Water Systems in Kenya" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 July 2015. Retrieved 23 July 2015.
  54. "Water Supply and Sanitation in Kenya" (PDF). Kenya Ministry of Water and Irrigation. 2009. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  55. Miguel, Edward (2004). "Ethnic Diversity, Social Sanctions, and Public Goods in Kenya" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2015. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  56. Government of the Republic of Liberia (2013). "WASH Sector Performance Report" (PDF). Retrieved 23 July 2015.
  57. Uhl, Daw, Baron, Vincent, Ashish, and Jaclyn (2012). How a City Gets its Drinking Water: A Case Study – Capital City of Monrovia, Liberia.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  58. Ryan, Peter (January 2014). "Madagascar WASH Sector Sustainability Check" (PDF). UNICEF. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 July 2015. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  59. Annis, Jonathan (2013). "Public-Private Partnerships in Madagascar: a promising approach to increase sustainability of piped water supply systems in rural towns" (PDF). USAID. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
  60. Shaw, David; Manda, James (December 2013). "Exploring the long-term sustainability of water, sanitation and hygiene services in Salima district, Malawi". WaterAid.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  61. "Malawi Sector Performance Report 2011 Irrigation , Water and Sanitation" (PDF). Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development. 23 April 2012. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
  62. Baumann, Danert, Erich, Kerstin (2008). "Operation and Maintenance of Rural Water Supplies in Malawi" (PDF). Swiss Resource Centre and Consultancies for Development. Retrieved 13 August 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  63. Baumann, Danert, Erich, Kerstin (2008). "Operation and Maintenance of Rural Water Supplies in Malawi" (PDF). Retrieved 15 August 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  64. Kleemeier, Elizabeth (2000-05-01). "The Impact of Participation on Sustainability: An Analysis of the Malawi Rural Piped Scheme Program". World Development. 28 (5): 929–944. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00155-2.
  65. Jones, Stephen (2013). "Sharing the recurrent costs of rural water services in four municipalities supported by WaterAid in Mali". Waterlines. 32 (4). Practical Action Publishing: 295–307. doi:10.3362/1756-3488.2013.031.
  66. Jansz, Shamila (March 2011). "A study into rural water supply sustainability in Niassa province, Mozambique". WaterAid. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  67. "WWF7: Akvo Flow hits one million mark for field surveys". Dutch Water Sector. Akvo. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  68. Government of Nepal. "National Management Information Project (NMIP)". Archived from the original on 19 April 2015. Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  69. FCG (May 2013). "NEPAL RURAL WA TER SUPPLY AND SANITATION SECTOR STUDY" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 July 2015. Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  70. Functionality/Sustainability Thematic Working Group (2010). Position Paper: Functionality of Water Supply Services (PDF). Nepal: Nepal Thematic Working Group. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
  71. "Nationwide Coverage and Functionality Status of Water Supply and Sanitation in Nepal" (PDF). National Management Information Project (NMIP). March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  72. "FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA Water Supply & Sanitation Interim Strategy Note November 2000" (PDF). Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2000. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  73. 1 2 UNICEF (2012): "WASH for School Children. State-of-the-art in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka" Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine . Provisional draft (retrieved 16 July 2015)
  74. Independent Evaluation Department (August 2009). Impact Evaluation Study of Rural Water Supply and Sanitation in Punjab, Pakistan. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
  75. Calderon, J., 2004. Agua y saneamiento: El caso del Perú rural Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine . Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine Lima, Peru: ITDG.
  76. "Estudios de base para la implementación de proyectos de agua y saneamiento en el área rura" (PDF). WSP. 2003. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  77. "Rehabilitación de Sistemas de Agua y Saneamiento Rural con Micro Crédito" (PDF). WSP. 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 September 2015. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  78. "Rwanda District of Kicukiro Sectors of Gahanga, Kanombe, Kigrama and Masaka Baseline Data" (PDF). Water for People. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
  79. "Sierra Leone Waterpoint report". Sierra Leone WASH Sector Learning. Sierra Leone Ministry of Water Resources. 2012. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
  80. BOURGOIS, CAO, KONTEH, TRUAN,. REDON (2013). "Existing Water Access Points in The Districts Of Bo, Koinadugu And Tonkolili In Sierra Leone Water Point Survey". Fondation Pro Victimis. Retrieved 7 August 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. CSIR (2007). Spot Check Assessments of MIG Water and Sanitation Projects (PDF). Pretoria, South Africa: Water Affairs & Forestry Department of South Africa. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
  82. Hazelton, Derek (2000). "The Development of Effective Community Water Supply Systems Using Deep and Shallow Well Handpumps" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2015. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  83. World Bank and Oxford University Press (2004). World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. doi:10.1596/0-8213-5468-X. ISBN   978-0-8213-5468-1.
  84. 1 2 Leclert (2014). "Assessment of the functionality of hand – pump boreholes drilled through the Basic Service s Fund , South Sudan" (PDF). Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  85. Government of Tanzania. "Water Point Mapping Tanzania" . Retrieved 17 July 2015.
  86. Welle, Katharina; Williams, Jennifer (January 2014). "REGIONAL APPROACH PAPER Monitoring and addressing governance factors affecting rural water supply sustainability" (PDF). Global Water Initiative. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 July 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2015.
  87. "Listening to Dar". 2012. Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  88. Taylor, Ben (2009). "Addressing the Sustainability Crisis Lessons from research on managing rural water projects". WaterAid. WaterAid Tanzania. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  89. "Water point mapping: The channel to accountability". SNV. 2014. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  90. "Covalima District Rural Water Supply Management Study". Oxfam. 2008. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  91. Truelove. "Sustainability of Community Managed Rural Water Supply in Post-Conflict Regions of Northern Uganda" . Retrieved 20 July 2015.
  92. 1 2 Ministry of Water and Environment Republic of Uganda. "Sector Performance Reports".
  93. SNV. "Functionality of Rural Water Supply Service in Africa" . Retrieved 20 July 2015.
  94. Mugumya (November 2013). Enabling community-based water management systems: governance and sustainability of rural point-water facilities in Uganda (doctoral). Dublin City University. Retrieved 20 July 2015.
  95. Welle, Katharina; Williams, Jennifer (January 2014). "REGIONAL APPROACH PAPER Monitoring and addressing governance factors affecting rural water supply sustainability". Global Water Initiative.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  96. Nekesa, Jacinta; Kulanyi, Rashidah (2012). "District hand pump mechanics associations in Uganda for improved operation and maintenance of rural water-supply systems". Waterlines. 31 (3): 170–183. doi:10.3362/1756-3488.2012.019.
  97. Abisa, Joseph; Smits, Stef; Bey, Valerie (2014). "Level of service received by water users in eight districts in Uganda". Triple-S. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 22 July 2015.
  98. "Uganda Water Supply Atlas". Ministry of Water and Environment, Republic of Uganda. 2010. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
  99. "The Role of Communities in the Management of Improved Water Supply Systems" (PDF). IRC. 1993. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  100. "AN EVALUATION OF THE SUSTAINABILITY OF A WATER SUPPLY PROJECT IN MT DARWIN DISTRICT: ZIMBABWE" (PDF). University of Zimbabwe. 2009. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  101. Waterkeyn, Juliet; Cairncross, Sandy (2005-11-01). "Creating demand for sanitation and hygiene through Community Health Clubs: A cost-effective intervention in two districts in Zimbabwe". Social Science & Medicine. 61 (9): 1958–1970. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.012. PMID   15927329.
  102. "LESSONS FOR BENCHMARKING FECAL SLUDGE MANAGEMENT SERVICES" (PDF). USAID. 2024. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
  103. "Health, Safety and Dignity of Sanitation Workers: An Initial Assessment" (PDF). World Bank Group, World Health Organization, International Labor Organization, WaterAid. 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
  104. WSP (Water and Sanitation Programme) (March 2012): "Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Cambodia. A six-country study conducted in Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines and Vietnam under the Economics of Sanitation Initiative (ESI)". (retrieved 16 July 2015)
  105. McConville, J., Rosemarin, A. (2012). Urine diversion dry toilets and greywater system, Erdos City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China – Case study of sustainable sanitation projects. Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA)
  106. Flores, A. (2010). Towards sustainable sanitation: evaluating the sustainability of resource-oriented sanitation. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK
  107. Rosemarin, Arno; McConville, Jennifer; Flores, Amparo; Qiang, Zhu (2012). The challenges of urban ecological sanitation : lessons from the Erdos eco-town project. Practical Action Publishers. p. 116. ISBN   978-1853397684.
  108. Tyndale-Biscoe, Paul; Bond, Matthew; Kidd, Ross (December 2013): "ODF sustainability study". PLAN. (retrieved 16 July 2015)
  109. Lantagne, Daniele; Balakrish Nair, G.; Lanata, Claudio F.; Cravioto, Alejandro (2013), Nair, G. Balakrish; Takeda, Yoshifumi (eds.), "The Cholera Outbreak in Haiti: Where and How did it begin?", Cholera Outbreaks, vol. 379, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 145–164, doi:10.1007/82_2013_331, ISBN   978-3-642-55403-2, PMID   23695726 , retrieved 2024-11-21
  110. "Remarks to the General Assembly on UN peace operations, New York, 12 October 2015". 2016-12-16. doi:10.18356/4bb1fbac-en . Retrieved 2024-11-21.
  111. Lee, Elizabeth C; Chao, Dennis L; Lemaitre, Joseph C; Matrajt, Laura; Pasetto, Damiano; Perez-Saez, Javier; Finger, Flavio; Rinaldo, Andrea; Sugimoto, Jonathan D; Halloran, M Elizabeth; Longini, Ira M; Ternier, Ralph; Vissieres, Kenia; Azman, Andrew S; Lessler, Justin (August 2020). "Achieving coordinated national immunity and cholera elimination in Haiti through vaccination: a modelling study". The Lancet Global Health. 8 (8): e1081–e1089. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30310-7. PMC   7738665 . PMID   32710864.
  112. Trémolet, Sophie; Binder, D (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of public finance for household sanitation in the state of Bihar, India. WaterAid & SHARE. Archived from the original on 2015-09-29. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
  113. Ryan, Peter (January 2014): "Madagascar WASH Sector Sustainability Check" Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine . Final Report (Draft), UNICEF. (retrieved 16 July 2015)
  114. 1 2 3 4 5 Hazvineyi, Lloyd (January 25, 2019). "Have 'hundreds' of kids drowned in school pit latrines in South Africa?". Africa Check. Retrieved November 19, 2024.
  115. "South Africa's school pit latrine scandal: Why children are drowning". 2018-06-03. Retrieved 2024-11-19.
  116. Anso, Thom (2 May 2013): "South Africa: School Toilets in Shocking State". All Africa. (retrieved 16 July 2015)
  117. Nyambe, Sikopo; Agestika, Lina; Yamauchi, Taro (2020-05-13). "The improved and the unimproved: Factors influencing sanitation and diarrhoea in a peri-urban settlement of Lusaka, Zambia". PLOS ONE. 15 (5): e0232763. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1532763N. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232763 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   7219762 . PMID   32401762.

Creative Commons by small.svg  This article incorporates text from this source, which isby Kate Neely and Nicholas Valcourt available under the CC BY 4.0 license.