Harle Syke Mill

Last updated

Harle Syke Mill
Oxford Mill, Harle Syke - geograph.org.uk - 230926.jpg
The Burnley Road frontage of Oxford mill
Location map United Kingdom Borough of Burnley.svg
Red pog.svg
Location within the Borough of Burnley
Cotton
Weaving mill
Architectural styleSingle storey
Location Harle Syke, Burnley, Lancashire, England
OwnerHaggate Joint Stock Company
Further ownership
  • Harle Syke Mill Company (1904)
Coordinates 53°48′43″N2°12′16″W / 53.8120°N 2.2045°W / 53.8120; -2.2045 Coordinates: 53°48′43″N2°12′16″W / 53.8120°N 2.2045°W / 53.8120; -2.2045
Construction
Built1856
Completed1856 (1856)
Floor count1
Power
Date1904
Engine maker Burnley Ironworks
Engine typeCross compound
Valve GearCorliss valves
rpm76
Installed horse power (ihp)700hp
Flywheel diameter18"6'
Transmission typeRope
Boiler configuration
BoilersTwin Lancashire boilers, coal fired
Pressure160
Equipment
Date1904, 1906
Manufacturer
  • Harling & Todd
No. of looms1700+

Harle Syke mill is a weaving shed in Briercliffe on the outskirts of Burnley, Lancashire. It was built on a green field site in 1856, together with terraced houses for the workers. These formed the nucleus of the community of Harle Syke. The village expanded and six other mills were built, including Queen Street Mill. [1]

Contents

The Haggate Joint Stock Commercial Company opened it in 1858 as a production mill, but re-organised it in 1865 to become a 'room and power' company. Seven producer partnerships were formed by the shareholders who had been allocated looms on a pro rata basis. The companies consolidated into 4 main businesses. Shares in the room and power 'walls' company were traded resulting in a smaller number of shareholders with larger investments. In 1903, the 'walls' liquidated passing assets to the Harle Syke Mill Company which built a new larger shed, jokingly called Siberia Shed after a delay in providing a heating system. The new mill engine which is now displayed in the Science Museum, London, where it is run on occasions under steam power. The older part of the building is called Oxford Mill.

Location

Harle Syke Mill, (now known as Oxford Mill and Siberia Mill), lies within Harle Syke, a suburb of Burnley, 4 km from the town centre, in the civil parish of Briercliffe with Extwistle. It lies 22 miles (35 km) north of Manchester and 26 miles (42 km) east of Preston. Harle Syke is on high ground to the south of the River Calder near the M65. Haggate was the older hamlet and it is there one finds the nearest public houses and Baptist chapel. The later mills in Harle Syke are Briercliffe Mill (1880), Walshaw Mill (1905), Queen Street Mill (1894), Primrose Mill (1905), and King's Mill (1912). [2]

History

Until the mid eighteenth century the agricultural workers on Briercliffe would supplement their income by having a wooden handloom at home where they would weave coarse woollen and mixed fabric cloth. Between 1770 and 1820, the huge increase in the availability of cheap machine spun cotton caused many families to leave the land and the whole family would start to weave cotton. It was their main source of income. In 1830, there were 171 Briercliffe families running 606 looms. This involved 968 persons: the population of the parish had expanded from 956 to 1755. [3] Most worked in the existing farmhouses or the newly built weavers' cottages with the loom shop above the living space. These were in Haggate, Lane Bottom, and Holt Hill. Country weavers were paid by piece-rate and were vulnerable to the varying market conditions, and unlike the weavers in towns who formed combinations to organise collective industrial action, they accepted the hardship. During the final boom years of the 1820s, the spinning mill owners used the increased profits to invest in power looms which were installed in weaving sheds in or alongside the steam driven spinning mills. [4] The 1830s were a time of hardship, and the population declined to 1498. The other employment was in the stone quarries. In Lane Bottom there was 'handloom factory' owned by the Smith family of Hill End, but there and in their cottage loomshops, handloom weavers competed for ever decreasing work in the sections of weaving for which the powerloom had not been adapted. Briercliffe had the labour but did not have available capital switch its economy to factory production. [5]

Smith's Mill

The power loom arrived in Briercliffe in 1848. The only family in Briercliffe that had any capital were the Smiths of Hill End. William Smith as the owner of a handloom factory was under the same pressures as individual rural hand loom weavers- and needed to modernise. In 1848, he opened Hill End Shed, a power loom shed with 400 looms at Lane Bottom. It employed 220 powerloom weavers half of whom were under twenty, 60% of them came from the village of Lane Bottom and only ten came from Haggate. Hand loom weaving using the domestic system still continued with 317 families in the district containing a handloom weaver. In Haggate there were 25 adult male handloom weavers. [6] [lower-alpha 1] When Hill End Mill was fully staffed, there was low staff turnover and it was never expanded. Though the power loom offered a better living than the domestic system or quarrying there were no mills to offer further jobs.

The Haggate Joint Stock Commercial Company, 1856

The 1844 Joint Stock Companies Act, pioneered by Sir Robert Peel made it possible for a group of workers to combine to form a legal company. This became a popular thing to do: the New Bacup and Wardle Commercial Company was one of the first. Some groups included in their articles of association 'co-operative principles' such as 'democracy'. Each worker invested a sum of money in shares in the company. Not all the investors would work in that mill, and some investors bought large numbers of shares. When the company made a profit, some of this was returned to the investor as a 'dividend'.

The Haggate Joint Stock Commercial Company achieved provisional registration on 27 March 1856 and registered 12 June and authorised to trade from 1 July 1856. It had thirteen promoters: nine weavers, two quarrymen, one beamer and one farmer. Ten came from villages in Briercliffe. Five were named as directors: William Smith (weaver), [lower-alpha 2] Robert Emmott (beamer), John Bradshaw (weaver from Burnley), Thomas Taylor (tackler) and Jonathan Duerden (quarryman). The proposed capital was £5000-0-0 in 500 shares of £10-0-0, and the place of business Haggate. There were 64 original shareholders- 45 of whom were weavers. Twenty-eight were illiterate signing papers with a cross. The 64 shareholders had taken up 152 shares pledging £1520- but this sum would be paid in installments. There was one shareholders meeting a year where the directors and auditor were elected. This was not a limited liability company so on failure, shareholders would be liable for unlimited sums. [7]

The Haggate Joint Stock Commercial Company bought a piece of flat land adjacent to the Harle Syke brook, close to the new Anglican church outside Haggate on the Burnley Road, and proceeded to build a 300 loom shed with space for a steam engine. With capital of only £1520- far short of the £5000 needed, they would have to go into debt and borrow short term 'loan money' at 4%, as £1520 in itself would only buy the looms needed. [8]

The mill was in full production at the end of 1857. While weavers elsewhere were striking for higher wages- the weaver owners of Haggate were working overtime- and on one occasion breaching the Ten Hour Act. At the end of five years in 1861 the company was trading profitably and investors decided to extend the shed. In 1862, Cotton stopped arriving due to the infamous Cotton Famine, the mills stopped with only 60 of Briercliffe's 360 weavers working. Though the situation reverted in 1864, the Haggate Joint Stock Commercial Company decided to restructure. [8]

Room and power

The decision was that Haggate Joint Stock Commercial Company should become a 'buildings company', offering room and power and to cease manufacturing. The 300 or so looms were distributed to the shareholders, each of share would attract five looms. As many of the weavers in the mill were also shareholders- they could continue their business by becoming tenants and renting power from the buildings company. Groups of weavers pooled their looms and formed new production companies which in time coalesced into larger companies. Some companies took their looms to others mills or expanded their operations elsewhere. Harle Syke mill quickly gained a reputation as a nursery for fledgling companies. [lower-alpha 3] Two companies eventually dominated the shed: 'Simpson and West' who expanded into Belle Vue Mill in Burnley; and 'James Thornton and Co'. [9]

Harle Syke Mill Company 1903

In 1903 the five directors of the Haggate Joint Stock Company liquidated the mill. The decision was forced by the need to replace the 1856 steam engine, an expense that could not be justified if the building were to remain a room and power mill. The directors had other business interest in Burnley and were aware of the market. All the assets were passed to the Harle Syke Mill Company who continued to provide 'room and power facilities' to the two remaining tenants. The new company replaced the steam engine, built a new weaving shed stocked it with 900 looms and started to manufacture cloth again after a break of forty years. The existing Haggate Joint Stock Company £10 shares were valued at £25, and each share holder got paid off in shares in the new Harle Syke Mill Company. [10]

The Long decline

The first war had little effect on weaving, and the peace dividend caused a boom and inflation. The profits were transferred to the shareholders in the form of bonus shares. In 1921 the economy crashed and the company entered a twenty-year period of austerity. Cotton Control in World War 2 forced cotton companies to reduce its capacity, in 1941 Harle Syke Mill had only 380 looms running and Queen Street Manufacturing Company moved into the bottom shop. Hagbergham Mill, Burnley moved into James Thornton & Co's space and they moved in with Harle Syke in the top shop. [11] After the war, things were reversed but key overseas markets had been permanently lost.

James Thornton & Co went out of business in 1952 and it shed was taken on by the Oxford Mill Company. Harle Syke Mill Company closed the bottom shed that year. [11]

Harle Syke Mill closed in September 1959 when the shareholders agreed to join the Conservative government's Cotton Industry Reorganisation Scheme 1959 whereby compensation was given for each loom destroyed. The firm wove out and smashed the looms the workforce was made redundant. A Manchester firm Manifold Textiles moved into Siberia trading as Finsley View Manufacturing Company, took on the workers and continued in production until 1970. [10]

The weaving sheds of both the 1856 building and the 1903 shed have been modified, some parts have been demolished to provide parking, but were still occupied in 2013. In 2010 planning permission was given to convert the Burnley Road warehouse into 12 residential apartments, a clinic and nursery. Some of the weaving shed would be cleared and houses built. [12] [13]

Operations in a weaving mill

When yarn enters a weaving mill, the warp is usually already on a beam and the weft is on different size cops and cheeses. The weft has to be wound onto pirns to fit in the shuttles suitable for installed looms. [14] The beam with 2000 or more ends is placed in the Cylinder Tape Sizing Machine. The threads pass through the size to stiffen them and reduce friction. The size is a mixture of flour soft soap and tallow. The ends are dried over steam-heated cylinders and wound onto the final beam, the weavers beam.

The weavers beam is now placed on the Drawing-in frame. Here each end is passed through the healds, and then through a reed. This job was done by a reacher-in and a loomer. The reacher-in, who would be young and usually a boy, passed each end in order through to the loomer. Alternatively, if the loom had already run that cloth, a short length of the previous warp thread could be left on the healds and reed, and a Barber Colman knotter ties the old ends to the new. This process took 20 minutes, considerably faster than starting afresh. Spare healds and reeds are stored above head height for that purpose. [14]

The loomed weavers beam is taken into the weaving shed, where it gaited to the loom by a tackler. One weaver would tenter 6, or 8 Lancashire Looms, which would be kept working by a tackler. Nine hundred looms Harling & Todd of Burnley, Lancashire looms of this period required 250 weavers and 9 tacklers. [14]

The 1903 mill

Architecture

As originally built the weaving shed was about 51 metres (167 ft) by 34 metres (112 ft), with the typical north facing roof lights (windows) giving natural light fronted on Burnley Road, by a two-storey 9 metres (30 ft) wide warehouse. The 1903 extension involved leasing 8,000 square yards (6,700 m2) of adjoining land and building a new weaving shed, which housed 990 looms and was 50 metres (160 ft) by 46 metres (151 ft), doubling the size of the weaving floor. This shed is known as top shed or Siberia due to it starting up before the steam heating pipes were working. A new warehouse was built at right angles to the existing one fronting Burnley Road. [15]

A weaving shed in the neighbouring mill Weaving shed, Queen Street Mill - geograph.org.uk - 680867.jpg
A weaving shed in the neighbouring mill

Power

The Burnley Iron works, Corliss valved 700 horsepower (520 kW) engine, now displayed in the London Science Museum Corliss.steam.engine.-.Science.Museum.London.jpg
The Burnley Iron works, Corliss valved 700 horsepower (520 kW) engine, now displayed in the London Science Museum

Steam is raised by two Lancashire boilers built by Oldham Ironworks costing £900. The steam raised to 160 psi in the boiler house drives a 700 horsepower (520 kW) cross compound horizontal stationary steam engine, built by the Burnley Iron Works (formerly Marslands).The high-pressure cylinder (HP) is 17 inches (43 cm) and the low-pressure (LP) 39 inches (99 cm). It uses Corliss valves. The engine drives a 18 feet 6 inches (5.64 m) flywheel running at 76 rpm. [16]

Equipment

The initial order for top shop was for 900 plain Lancashire looms with a 40 inches (1,000 mm) reedspace, five companies tendered and the Harling and Todd won the contract supplying looms at £5-12-0 a piece. They were delivered by April 1904. In 1905 William West moved out of bottom shop and a further 416 Harling and Todd looms were purchased at £6-0-0 each. [17] In addition Harling and Todd provided five cop winding frames. Howard and Bullough provided two tapes (tape sizing machines) and eight beaming frames.

Staff

The first to be appointed were Thomas Bannister the company secretary and salesman at £2-10-0 a week, John Taylor the chief overlooker and 'inside manager' at £2-2-0 a week. There were seven tacklers and then beamers and loomers. The book-keeper and wages clerk earned £1-4-0, the two labourers earned £1-2-0 while several cut-lookers (warehousemen) received £1-0-0. [18] When the bottom shop was vacated, an additional three tacklers, two beamers and a taper were employed. [19] The number of weavers was not recorded in the directors' minutes, but there appear to be around 300. John Taylor was a director and shareholder but also an employee as were many others and it was this that made the 'Harle Syke model' unique. [20]

Owners and Tenants

During the period between 1865 and 1903, the room and power mill was home to many manufacturing companies. Some prospered, expanded and moved to Burnley and elsewhere; names such as Altham, Burrows, Emmott, Forster, Heasandford, Spencer, Thornton, and Walton. [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loom</span> Device for weaving textiles

A loom is a device used to weave cloth and tapestry. The basic purpose of any loom is to hold the warp threads under tension to facilitate the interweaving of the weft threads. The precise shape of the loom and its mechanics may vary, but the basic function is the same.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Power loom</span> Mechanised loom powered by a line shaft

A power loom is a mechanized loom, and was one of the key developments in the industrialization of weaving during the early Industrial Revolution. The first power loom was designed and patented in 1785 by Edmund Cartwright. It was refined over the next 47 years until a design by the Howard and Bullough company made the operation completely automatic. This device was designed in 1834 by James Bullough and William Kenworthy, and was named the Lancashire loom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cotton mill</span> Building producing yarn or cloth from cotton

A cotton mill is a building that houses spinning or weaving machinery for the production of yarn or cloth from cotton, an important product during the Industrial Revolution in the development of the factory system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Textile manufacture during the British Industrial Revolution</span> Early textile production via automated means

Textile manufacture during the British Industrial Revolution was centred in south Lancashire and the towns on both sides of the Pennines in the United Kingdom. The main drivers of the Industrial Revolution were textile manufacturing, iron founding, steam power, oil drilling, the discovery of electricity and its many industrial applications, the telegraph and many others. Railroads, steam boats, the telegraph and other innovations massively increased worker productivity and raised standards of living by greatly reducing time spent during travel, transportation and communications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrowford</span> Large village and civil parish in the Pendle district of Lancashire, England

Barrowford is a large village and civil parish in the Pendle district of Lancashire, England. It is situated to the north of Nelson on the other side of the M65 motorway, and forms part of the Nelson conurbation. It also comprises the area of Lowerford. The parish has a population of 6,171. The community is located near the Forest of Bowland, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty while the Borough of Pendle is at the southern edge of the Yorkshire Dales.

The Hattersley loom was developed by George Hattersley and Sons of Keighley, West Yorkshire, England. The company had been started by Richard Hattersley after 1784, with his son, George Hattersley, later entering the business alongside him. The company developed a number of innovative looms, of which the Hattersley Standard Loom – developed in 1921 – was a great success.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weavers' cottage</span> Housing for cloth weavers

A weavers' cottage was a type of house used by weavers for cloth production in the putting-out system sometimes known as the domestic system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lancashire Loom</span> Semi-automatic power loom (1842)

The Lancashire Loom was a semi-automatic power loom invented by James Bullough and William Kenworthy in 1842. Although it is self-acting, it has to be stopped to recharge empty shuttles. It was the mainstay of the Lancashire cotton industry for a century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Haggate</span> Human settlement in England

Haggate is a small village within the parish of Briercliffe, situated three miles north of Burnley, Lancashire. The village is mostly built around a small crossroads, with routes towards Burnley, Nelson and Todmorden. The first buildings in the village date from the 16th century, when the Hare and Hounds public house, which still stands to this day, was built. The village was first officially documented in the 17th century. The origins of the name Haggate are unclear, although it is thought that it could mean, "the path by the hawthorn trees". The village itself is situated at the top of a hill, 800 feet above sea level. The buildings in the village are predominantly stone-built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weavers' Triangle</span> Historic textie-producing area with a cotton museum in Lancashire, England

The Weavers' Triangle is an area of Burnley in Lancashire, England consisting mostly of 19th-century industrial buildings at the western side of town centre clustered around the Leeds and Liverpool Canal. The area has significant historic interest as the cotton mills and associated buildings encapsulate the social and economic development of the town and its weaving industry. From the 1980s, the area has been the focus of major redevelopment efforts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Queen Street Mill</span> Building in Harle Syke, to the north-east of Burnley, Lancashire

Queen Street Mill is a former weaving mill in Harle Syke, a suburb to the north-east of Burnley, Lancashire, that is a Grade I listed building. It now operates as a museum and cafe. Currently open for public tours between April and November. Over winter the café is opened on Wednesdays. It is also viewable with private bookings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harle Syke</span> Human settlement in England

Harle Syke is a small village within the parish of Briercliffe, situated three miles north of Burnley, Lancashire, England. It was the home to eleven weaving firms, working out of seven mills. Queen Street Mill closed in 1982, and was converted to a textile museum, preserving it as a working mill. It is the world's last 19th-century steam powered weaving mill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weaving shed</span> Originally a single storey mill developed in the 1800s

A weaving shed is a distinctive type of mill developed in the early 1800s in Lancashire, Derbyshire and Yorkshire to accommodate the new power looms weaving cotton, silk, woollen and worsted. A weaving shed can be a stand-alone mill, or a component of a combined mill. Power looms cause severe vibrations requiring them to be located on a solid ground floor. In the case of cotton, the weaving shed needs to remain moist. Maximum daylight is achieved, by the sawtooth "north-facing roof lights".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Roberts & Co of Nelson</span>

William Roberts and Company of Phoenix Foundry in Nelson, Lancashire, England, produced many of the steam engines that powered cotton weaving and spinning mills of Pendle and neighbouring districts. Industrial historian Mike Rothwell has called Phoenix foundry “Nelson’s most significant engineering site”.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bancroft Shed</span> Mill museum in England

Bancroft Shed was a weaving shed in Barnoldswick, Lancashire, England, situated on the road to Skipton. Construction was started in 1914 and the shed was commissioned in 1920 for James Nutter & Sons Limited. The mill closed on 22 December 1978 and was demolished. The engine house, chimneys and boilers have been preserved and maintained as a working steam museum. The mill was the last steam-driven weaving shed to be constructed and the last to close.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">More looms</span>

The more looms system was a productivity strategy introduced in the Lancashire cotton industry, whereby each weaver would manage a greater number of looms. It was an alternative to investing in the more productive Northrop automatic looms in the 1930s. It caused resentment, industrial action and failed to achieve any significant cost savings.

Piece-rate lists were the ways of assessing a cotton operatives pay in Lancashire in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. They started as informal agreements made by one cotton master and their operatives then each cotton town developed their own list. Spinners merged all of these into two main lists which were used by all, while weavers used one 'unified' list.

Steaming or artificial humidity was the process of injecting steam from boilers into cotton weaving sheds in Lancashire, England, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The intention was to prevent breakages in short-staple Indian Surat cotton which was introduced in 1862 during a blockade of American cotton at the time of the American Civil War. There was considerable concern about the health implications of steaming. Believed to cause ill health, this practice became the subject of much campaigning and investigation from the 1880s to the 1920s. A number of Acts of Parliament imposed modifications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dandy loom</span>

A Dandy loom was a hand loom, that automatically ratchetted the take-up beam. Each time the weaver moved the sley to beat-up the weft, a rachet and pawl mechanism advanced the cloth roller. In 1802 William Ratcliffe of Stockport patented a Dandy loom with a cast-iron frame. It was this type of Dandy loom that was used in the small dandy loom shops.

References

Notes

  1. The 1851 census has been analysed and compared with previous censuses. It shows the transition
  2. Not the same William Smith as the one from Hill End Mill.
  3. In Lancashire each of these producer companies would be called a mill, so later Harle Syke Mill would house two mills, and today the name of the building has been all but lost, but the name Oxford Mill and Siberia Mill live on.

Citations

  1. Kippax, Rowland (1 August 1978). "Village had eleven flourishing mills". Briercliffe Society. Burnley, Lancashire: Burnley Express. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  2. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. x.
  3. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 5.
  4. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 4.
  5. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 7.
  6. Bythell & Frost 2009, pp. 8, 9.
  7. Bythell & Frost 2009, pp. 12–16.
  8. 1 2 Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 17.
  9. Bythell & Frost 2009, pp. 28, 29.
  10. 1 2 Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 52.
  11. 1 2 Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 73.
  12. Dillon, Jonathan (26 February 2010). "Landmark Burnley mill set for a revival". Lancashire Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2 December 2012. Retrieved 11 July 2013.
  13. Dillon, Jonathan (8 March 2010). "Burnley mill plan agreed as dispute resolved". Lancashire Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2 December 2012. Retrieved 11 July 2013.
  14. 1 2 3 "The last remaining steam powered mill in the world". Lancashire County Council. 2011.
  15. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 53.
  16. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 59.
  17. Bythell & Frost 2009, pp. 58, 60.
  18. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 58.
  19. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 60.
  20. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 66.
  21. Bythell & Frost 2009, p. 90-91.

Bibliography