Minds (social network)

Last updated

Minds
Minds logo.svg
Type of business Private
Type of site
Social network
Headquarters Glastonbury, Connecticut, US [1]
Key people
  • Bill Ottman, founder and CEO
  • John Ottman, co-founder and chairman
  • Mark Harding, co-founder and CTO
  • Ian Crossland, co-founder
Industry Internet
URL minds.com
RegistrationRequired to post, follow, or be followed; anonymous registration allowed
LaunchedJune 2015

Minds is an open-source and distributed social network. Users can earn cryptocurrency for using Minds, and tokens can be used to boost their posts or crowdfund other users. [2] [3] Minds has been described as more privacy-focused than mainstream social media networks. [4] [5]

Contents

Writers in The New York Times , Engadget, and Vice have noted the volume of far-right users and content on the platform, following a trend across social media. [6] [7] [3] Minds describes itself as focused on free speech, and minimally moderates the content on its platform. Its founders have said that they do not remove extremist content from the site out of a desire to deradicalize those who post it through civil discourse. [3]

History

Minds was co-founded in 2011 by Bill Ottman and John Ottman as an alternative to social networks such as Facebook, which the founders believed abused their users via "spying, data mining, algorithm manipulation, and no revenue sharing". [8] Other cofounders were Mark Harding, Ian Crossland, and Jack Ottman. Minds launched to the public in June 2015. [9]

A Facebook page affiliated with the hacktivist group Anonymous encouraged its followers to support Minds in 2015, and called for developers to contribute to the service's open source codebase. [9] [4] [10]

In 2018, over 150,000 Vietnamese users joined Minds after fearing that Facebook would comply with a new law requiring them to remove political dissent and release user data to the Vietnamese government. [3] [11] [5] Beginning in May 2020, over 250,000 Thai users joined Minds after growing concerns about privacy on Twitter, which had been widely used for political activism. [5] [12] This led Minds to add Thai language support to its mobile apps, and upgrade its servers to handle the influx of traffic. [12]

In October 2019, United States President Donald Trump invited Minds to a social media summit hosted at the White House. [13] In January 2021, after YouTube and Facebook removed tens of thousands of Trump supporters and alleged white supremacists from their platforms in the wake of the 2021 United States Capitol attack earlier that month, Minds was among the alternative apps those users adopted. [6]

In June 2020, Minds hosted "MINDS: Festival of Ideas" at the Beacon Theatre in New York City. Appearances included Tulsi Gabbard, Daryl Davis, Tim Pool, and Cornel West. [14]

Service

Minds is a website as well as a desktop and mobile app. [9] The platform awards Ethereum ERC20 cryptocurrency tokens to its users based on their engagement with the site, and users spend tokens to promote their content or to crowdfund other users through monthly subscriptions. [2] [3] The tokens can also be bought and redeemed for standard currency. [3] Minds offers a monthly premium subscription that gives users access to exclusive content, the ability to become verified, and the ability to remove boosted posts from their feed. [2]

Posts on Minds appear in reverse chronological order, unlike many mainstream platforms that use more complex and often secret ranking algorithms to determine which posts appear. [2] [9] [4]

Minds has been described as an alt-tech platform, alongside other services including Parler, Gab, BitChute, and MeWe. [15]

Privacy and security

Minds has been described as more privacy-focused than its competitors. All messages sent between users are end-to-end encrypted, meaning even those who work for the company can't read their contents. [4] [5] Minds is also open source, so its codebase can be freely audited for vulnerabilities or other privacy concerns. [16] Users can optionally register anonymously. [16]

In 2015 an application security consultant posted to the Full Disclosure mailing list to say that the Minds client was accepting encryption keys without any identity verification, and that Minds was using its own weak cryptography protocol. Earlier the same week, a security company had released a full disclosure report claiming they had found that it was possible for them to delete any message, edit any user's profile, and upload arbitrary files to Minds. Mark Harding, Minds' CTO, denied the claims made on the mailing list. A security researcher at Johns Hopkins Information Security Institute agreed that the encryption used by Minds was weak, saying that although it wasn't necessarily exploitable, "I am not optimistic that they got it right". Bill Ottman, Minds' CEO, acknowledged the issues reported in the security company's full disclosure and said that the company had addressed them. [17]

Content

In a 2018 interview with TechCrunch, founder and CEO Bill Ottman said that Mind's mission was "Internet freedom with privacy, transparency, free speech within the law and user control". [8] Minds' terms of service disallows doxing, inciting violence, posting terroristic content, and harassing other users directly. [2] [3] Minds has been described as less rigorous about removing objectionable content than more mainstream social networks. [2] [3] A 2018 Wired article noted that hate speech was not disallowed, and reported that "The vast majority of content on Minds is innocuous, but posts do appear there that would constitute hate speech on other platforms". [2]

Following a February 2018 appearance by Ottman on the Fox News show Tucker Carlson Tonight , Media Matters for America described Minds as "full of bigotry" and described the site's content as racist, antisemitic, and misogynist. [18] Also in 2018, a writer for Engadget wrote about his concerns with the site's commitment to protecting free speech: "It's not until you survey the most popular channels on the platform that you start wondering what sort of free speech and debate Minds is interested in protecting. The site's stars are largely the intellectual bantamweights of the far-right movement, and the debate seems very one-sided. If you're wondering where people with Pepe the Frog avatars have migrated to, it's here. In fact, the general tenor of Minds is a combination of race hate, gun porn, 'pro-white erotica' and lots and lots of weed". [7] Vice criticized Minds in 2019 as a "haven" for neo-Nazis and far-right groups and individuals. [3] [13] In response to the 2019 allegations, the site banned several neo-Nazis and people belonging to other hate groups. [3] Nathaniel Popper wrote for The New York Times in 2021 that Minds "became an online home to some of the right-wing personalities and neo-Nazis who were booted from mainstream social networks, along with fringe groups, in other countries, that have been targeted by their governments". [6]

Moderation

In 2018, Minds had a small team that was responsible for policing content on the site, and was not using artificial intelligence to try to detect content that violated the site's terms of service. In May 2019, Wired wrote that Minds' moderation team was "about five" people, and that the company was in the process of forming a "jury system" that would remove content based on votes from its users. [3] In August 2019, Ottman said to NPR that they had recently rolled out the jury system, which allows users who feel moderation of their content has been unfair to appeal to a randomly-selected twelve-person jury made up of other users. [19]

Deradicalization

Ottman has said that he opposes removing hate speech and other objectionable content from Minds because he believes it can draw more attention to it, and that he opposes deplatforming extremists because he believes it only serves to push people towards more "other darker corners of the internet". In a 2019 statement to Vice , Minds executives expressed their belief that "free expression and transparency as the antidote to radicalization, violence, and extremism". [3]

Minds has partnered with Daryl Davis on a deradicalization project called "Change Minds". Davis is a Black R&B musician who also engages with members of the Ku Klux Klan to try to convince them to leave and disavow the group. Davis has said he hopes to use Minds to teach people how to engage civilly with one another even when they hold opposing views. [20] [21]

Users

Minds told Business Insider it had experienced 60 million visits in 2015. [4] In 2018, Wired said that Minds had 1 million users in total, 110,000 of whom were active in a given month. [2] In May 2020, Minds reported having more than 2.5 million registered users and 300,000 monthly active users. [12]

According to The Guardian , Minds is one of a group of alt-tech websites "whose light touch in content moderation is presented as a commitment to free speech", which has led conservatives to create accounts on the platform to use in the event of bans from more restrictive sites. [22] In January 2021, the New York Times reported that YouTube and Facebook removed tens of thousands of Trump supporters and white supremacists from their platforms, and that Minds was among the alternative apps those users adopted. [6]

Funding

Minds has been funded through venture capital and equity crowdfunding. [6] The company raised $350,000 in 2013. The service later raised $1 million via a Regulation CF equity crowdfunding campaign. [8] In October 2018, Minds raised $6 million in Series A funding from Medici Ventures, an Overstock.com subsidiary. Patrick M. Byrne, founder and CEO of Overstock.com, joined Minds' board of directors. [16] He was later succeeded by Stanton Huntington, General Counsel at Medici Ventures. [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship in India</span> Overview of Internet censorship in India

Internet censorship in India is done by both central and state governments. DNS filtering and educating service users in suggested usages is an active strategy and government policy to regulate and block access to Internet content on a large scale. Measures for removing content at the request of content creators through court orders have also become more common in recent years. Initiating a mass surveillance government project like Golden Shield Project is an alternative that has been discussed over the years by government bodies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facebook</span> Social networking service owned by Meta Platforms

Facebook is a social media and social networking service owned by American technology conglomerate Meta Platforms. Created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with four other Harvard College students and roommates Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, and Chris Hughes, its name derives from the face book directories often given to American university students. Membership was initially limited to Harvard students, gradually expanding to other North American universities. Since 2006, Facebook allows everyone to register from 13 years old, except in the case of a handful of nations, where the age limit is 14 years. As of December 2022, Facebook claimed 3 billion monthly active users. As of October 2023, Facebook ranked as the 3rd most visited website in the world with 22.56% of its traffic coming from the United States. It was the most downloaded mobile app of the 2010s.

Facebook has been the subject of criticism and legal action since it was founded in 2004. Criticisms include the outsize influence Facebook has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well as Facebook's influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed. Notable issues include Internet privacy, such as use of a widespread "like" button on third-party websites tracking users, possible indefinite records of user information, automatic facial recognition software, and its role in the workplace, including employer-employee account disclosure. The use of Facebook can have negative psychological and physiological effects that include feelings of sexual jealousy, stress, lack of attention, and social media addiction that in some cases is comparable to drug addiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parler</span> American alt-tech social networking service

Parler is a now-closed American alt-tech social networking service associated with conservatives. Launched in August 2018, Parler marketed itself as a free speech-focused and unbiased alternative to mainstream social networks such as Twitter and Facebook. Journalists described Parler as an alt-tech alternative to Twitter, with its users including those banned from mainstream social networks or who oppose their moderation policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 230</span> US federal law on website liability

Section 230 is a section of Title 47 of the United States Code that was enacted as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which is Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and generally provides immunity for online computer services with respect to third-party content generated by its users. At its core, Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facebook F8</span> Mostly-annual conference held by Facebook, intended for developers and entrepreneurs

Facebook F8 is a mostly-annual conference held by Meta Platforms since 2007, intended for developers and entrepreneurs who build products and services around the website. The event has generally started with a keynote speech by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, followed by various breakout sessions concentrating on specific topics. Facebook has often introduced new features and made new announcements at the conference.

Disqus is an American blog comment hosting service for websites and online communities that use a networked platform. The company's platform includes various features, such as social integration, social networking, user profiles, spam and moderation tools, analytics, email notifications, and mobile commenting. It was founded in 2007 by Daniel Ha and Jason Yan as a Y Combinator startup.

Since the arrival of early social networking sites in the early 2000s, online social networking platforms have expanded exponentially, with the biggest names in social media in the mid-2010s being Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Snapchat. The massive influx of personal information that has become available online and stored in the cloud has put user privacy at the forefront of discussion regarding the database's ability to safely store such personal information. The extent to which users and social media platform administrators can access user profiles has become a new topic of ethical consideration, and the legality, awareness, and boundaries of subsequent privacy violations are critical concerns in advance of the technological age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloudflare</span> American technology company

Cloudflare, Inc. is an American company that provides content delivery network services, cloud cybersecurity, DDoS mitigation, and ICANN-accredited domain registration services. Cloudflare's headquarters are in San Francisco, California. According to The Hill, Cloudflare is used by more than 20 percent of the Internet for its web security services, as of 2022.

Anonymous social media is a subcategory of social media wherein the main social function is to share and interact around content and information anonymously on mobile and web-based platforms. Another key aspect of anonymous social media is that content or information posted is not connected with particular online identities or profiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gab (social network)</span> American alt-tech social media service

Gab is an American alt-tech microblogging and social networking service known for its far-right userbase. Widely described as a haven for neo-Nazis, racists, white supremacists, white nationalists, antisemites, the alt-right, supporters of Donald Trump, conservatives, right-libertarians, and believers in conspiracy theories such as QAnon, Gab has attracted users and groups who have been banned from other social media platforms and users seeking alternatives to mainstream social media platforms. Founded in 2016 and launched publicly in May 2017, Gab claims to promote free speech, individual liberty, the "free flow of information online", and Christian values. Researchers and journalists have characterized these assertions as an obfuscation of its extremist ecosystem. Antisemitism is prominent in the site's content and the company itself has engaged in antisemitic commentary. Gab CEO Andrew Torba has promoted the white genocide conspiracy theory. Gab is based in Pennsylvania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship by Facebook</span>

Facebook has been involved in multiple controversies involving censorship of content, removing or omitting information from its services in order to comply with company policies, legal demands, and government censorship laws.

BitChute is an alt-tech video hosting service launched by Ray Vahey in January 2017. It describes itself as offering freedom of speech, while the service is known for hosting far-right individuals, conspiracy theorists, and hate speech. Some creators who use BitChute have been banned from YouTube; some others crosspost content to both platforms or post more extreme content only to BitChute. Before its deprecation, BitChute claimed to use peer-to-peer WebTorrent technology for video distribution, though this was disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deplatforming</span> Administrative or political action to deny access to a platform to express opinions

Deplatforming, also known as no-platforming, has been defined as an "attempt to boycott a group or individual through removing the platforms used to share information or ideas", or "the action or practice of preventing someone holding views regarded as unacceptable or offensive from contributing to a forum or debate, especially by blocking them on a particular website."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TikTok</span> Chinese video-focused social media platform

TikTok, whose mainland Chinese counterpart is Douyin, is a short-form video hosting service owned by ByteDance. It hosts user-submitted videos, which can range in duration from 3 seconds to 10 minutes.

MeWe is a global social media and social networking service. As a company based in Los Angeles, California it is also known as Sgrouples, Inc., doing business as MeWe. The site has been described as a Facebook alternative due to its focus on data privacy.

Epik is an American domain registrar and web hosting company known for providing services to alt-tech websites that host far-right, neo-Nazi, and other extremist materials. It has been described as a "safehaven for the extreme right" because of its willingness to provide services to far-right websites that have been denied service by other Internet service providers.

The advent of social networking services has led to many issues spanning from misinformation and disinformation to privacy concerns related to public and private personal data.

Meta Platforms Inc., or Meta for short, has faced a number of privacy concerns. These stem partly from the company's revenue model that involves selling information collected about its users for many things including advertisement targeting. Meta Platforms Inc. has also been a part of many data breaches that have occurred within the company. These issues and others are further described including user data concerns, vulnerabilities in the company's platform, investigations by pressure groups and government agencies, and even issues with students. In addition, employers and other organizations/individuals have been known to use Meta Platforms Inc. for their own purposes. As a result, individuals’ identities and private information have sometimes been compromised without their permission. In response to these growing privacy concerns, some pressure groups and government agencies have increasingly asserted the users’ right to privacy and to be able to control their personal data.

Alt-tech are social media platforms and Internet service providers that have become popular among the alt-right, far-right, and others who espouse extremism or fringe theories, often because they employ less stringent content moderation than mainstream platforms. The term "alt-tech" is a portmanteau of "alt-right" and "Big Tech". In the 2010s, some prominent conservatives and their supporters began to use alt-tech platforms because they had been banned from other social media platforms. Alt-tech platforms describe themselves as protectors of free speech and individual liberty, which researchers and journalists have alleged may be a cover for antisemitism and terrorism.

References

  1. "Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities". U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission . September 25, 2018. Archived from the original on September 5, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Matsakis, Louise (April 19, 2018). "Minds is the anti-Facebook that Pays Users for Their Time". Wired . Archived from the original on June 29, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Makuch, Ben; Pearson, Jordan (May 28, 2019). "Minds, the 'Anti-Facebook,' Has No Idea What to Do About All the Neo-Nazis". Vice . Archived from the original on September 1, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Guthrie Weissman, Cale (June 15, 2015). "Anonymous is supporting a new privacy-focused social network that takes aim at Facebook's shady practices". Business Insider . Archived from the original on November 22, 2018. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Arora, Nishant (July 12, 2020). "Anti-Facebook crypto social network 'Minds' bets big on India". Outlook . Archived from the original on September 5, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020 via IANS.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Popper, Nathaniel (January 26, 2021). "They Found a Way to Limit Big Tech's Power: Using the Design of Bitcoin". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 2, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
  7. 1 2 Cooper, Daniel (April 20, 2018). "I believe in free speech, but Minds makes me queasy". Engadget . Archived from the original on April 20, 2018. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  8. 1 2 3 Biggs, John (April 17, 2018). "Minds aims to decentralize the social network". TechCrunch . Archived from the original on September 5, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Griffin, Andrew (June 17, 2015). "Super-Private Social Network Launched to Take on Facebook with Support of Anonymous". The Independent . Archived from the original on August 31, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  10. Collins, Katie (June 16, 2015). "Anonymous backs encrypted social network 'Minds'". Wired UK. ISSN   1357-0978. Archived from the original on September 5, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  11. "Vietnam activists flock to 'safe' social media after cyber crackdown". The Star . July 6, 2018. Archived from the original on September 2, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020 via AFP.
  12. 1 2 3 Hui, Mary (May 27, 2020). "People in Thailand distrustful of Twitter are flocking to a crypto social network instead". Quartz . Archived from the original on July 31, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  13. 1 2 Makuch, Ben (October 7, 2019). "Trump Invites Fringe Social Media Company Popular With Nazis to the White House". Vice . Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved May 29, 2021.
  14. "Minds Festival of Ideas w/ Tulsi Gabbard, Tim Pool, Seth Dillon, James O'Keefe, Blaire White & More". Youtube. June 29, 2022. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  15. Smith, Adam (June 24, 2020). "What is the right-wing Parler app that MPs and celebrities are joining?". The Independent . Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  16. 1 2 3 Biggs, John (October 27, 2018). "Minds, the blockchain-based social network, grabs a $6M Series A". TechCrunch . Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  17. Cox, Joseph (June 24, 2015). "The Social Network Supposedly Endorsed by Anonymous Isn't So Secure After All". Vice . Archived from the original on September 5, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  18. G., Cristina López (February 22, 2018). "Tucker Carlson promotes another social media platform full of bigotry". Media Matters for America . Archived from the original on May 23, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  19. Kaste, Martin (August 6, 2019). "Debate Over Policing Free Speech Intensifies As 8chan Struggles To Stay Online". NPR . Archived from the original on February 26, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
  20. Duwe, Morena (March 18, 2020). "Daryl Davis: the black musician who converts Ku Klux Klan members". The Guardian . Archived from the original on February 17, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
  21. "How to Have Constructive and Safe Talks About Race With Author and Musician Daryl Davis". KTLA . November 12, 2019. Archived from the original on March 17, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
  22. Wilson, Jason (January 13, 2021). "Rightwingers flock to 'alt tech' networks as mainstream sites ban Trump". The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved January 13, 2021.
  23. Blum, Alexander (September 7, 2016). "Minds.com and the State of Online Discourse". HuffPost . Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved November 7, 2020.