Offshore aquaculture

Last updated
Offshore aquaculture uses fish cages similar to these inshore cages, except they are submerged and moved offshore into deeper water. Fish cages.jpg
Offshore aquaculture uses fish cages similar to these inshore cages, except they are submerged and moved offshore into deeper water.
Lukas Manomaitis, managing director, Seafood Consulting Associates [1]

Offshore aquaculture, also known as open water aquaculture or open ocean aquaculture, is an emerging approach to mariculture (seawater aquafarming) where fish farms are positioned in deeper and less sheltered waters some distance away from the coast, where the cultivated fish stocks are exposed to more naturalistic living conditions with stronger ocean currents and more diverse nutrient flow. [2] [3] Existing "offshore" developments fall mainly into the category of exposed areas rather than fully offshore. As maritime classification society DNV GL has stated, development and knowledge-building are needed in several fields for the available deeper water opportunities to be realized. [4]

Contents

One of the concerns with inshore aquaculture, which operate on more sheltered (and thus calmer) shallow waters, is that the discarded nutrients from unconsumed feeds and feces can accumulate on the farm's seafloor and damage the benthic ecosystem, [5] and sometimes contribute to algal blooms. According to proponents of offshore aquaculture, the wastes from aquafarms that have been moved offshore tend to be swept away and diluted into the open ocean. Moving aquaculture offshore also provides more ecological space where production yields can expand to meet the increasing market demands for fish. Offshore facilities also avoid many of the conflicts with other marine resource users in the more crowded inshore waters, though there can still be user conflicts offshore.

Critics are concerned about issues such as the ongoing consequences of using antibiotics and other drug pollutions, and the possibilities of cultured fish escaping and spreading disease among wild fish. [3] [6]

Background

Aquaculture is the most rapidly expanding food industry in the world [7] as a result of declining wild fisheries stocks and profitable business. [2] In 2008, aquaculture provided 45.7% of the fish produced globally for human consumption; increasing at a mean rate of 6.6% a year since 1970. [8]

In 1970, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) grant brought together a group of oceanographers, engineers and marine biologists to explore whether offshore aquaculture, which was then considered a futuristic activity, was feasible. [9] In the United States, the future of offshore aquaculture technology within federal waters has become much talked-about. [10] As many commercial operations show, it is now technically possible to culture finfish, shellfish, and seaweeds using offshore aquaculture technology. [10]

Major challenges for the offshore aquaculture industry involve designing and deploying cages that can withstand storms, dealing with the logistics of working many kilometers from land, and finding species that are sufficiently profitable to cover the costs of rearing fish in exposed offshore areas. [11]

Technology

To withstand the high energy offshore environment, farms must be built to be more robust than those inshore. [2] [12] However, the design of the offshore technology is developing rapidly, aimed at reducing cost and maintenance. [13]

While the ranching systems currently used for tuna use open net cages at the surface of the sea (as is done also in salmon farming), the offshore technology usually uses submersible cages. [2] These large rigid cages – each one able to hold many thousands of fish – are anchored on the sea floor, but can move up and down the water column. [13] They are attached to buoys on the surface which frequently contain a mechanism for feeding and storage for equipment. [13] Similar technology is being used in waters near the Bahamas, China, the Philippines, Portugal, Puerto Rico, and Spain. [13] By submerging cages or shellfish culture systems, wave effects are minimized and interference with boating and shipping is reduced. [2] [14] Offshore farms can be made more efficient and safer if remote control is used, [15] and technologies such as an 18-tonne buoy that feeds and monitors fish automatically over long periods are being developed. [13]

Existing offshore structures

Multi-functional use of offshore waters can lead to more sustainable aquaculture "in areas that can be simultaneously used for other activities such as energy production". [14] Operations for finfish and shellfish are being developed. For example, the Hubb-Sea World Research Institutes’ project to convert a retired oil platform 10 nm off the southern California coast to an experimental offshore aquaculture facility. [16] The institute plans to grow mussels and red abalone on the actual platform, as well as white seabass, striped bass, bluefin tuna, California halibut and California yellowtail in floating cages. [16]

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), or polyculture, occurs when species which must be fed, such as finfish, are cultured alongside species which can feed on dissolved nutrients, such as seaweeds, or organic wastes, such as suspension feeders and deposit feeders. [17] This sustainable method could solve several problems with offshore aquaculture. [17] The method is being pioneered in Spain, Canada, and elsewhere. [10]

Roaming cages

Roaming cages have been envisioned as the "next generation technology" for offshore aquaculture. [13] These are large mobile cages powered by thrusters and able to take advantage of ocean currents. [13] One idea is that juvenile tuna, starting out in mobile cages in Mexico, could reach Japan after a few months, matured and ready for the market. [2] However, implementing such ideas will have regulatory and legal implications. [13]

Space conflicts

As oceans industrialise, conflicts are increasing among the users of marine space. [18] This competition for marine space is developing in a context where natural resources can be seen as publicly owned. [19] There can be conflict with the tourism industry, [20] recreational fishers, [19] wild harvest fisheries [21] and the siting of marine renewable energy installations. [22] The problems can be aggravated by the remoteness of many marine areas, and difficulties with monitoring and enforcement. [22] On the other hand, remote sites can be chosen that avoid conflicts with other users, and allow large scale operations with resulting economies of scale. [3] Offshore systems can provide alternatives for countries with few suitable inshore sites, like Spain. [3]

Ecological impacts

The ecological impacts of offshore aquaculture are somewhat uncertain because it is still largely in the research stage. [2]

Many of the concerns over potential offshore aquaculture impacts are paralleled by similar, well established concerns over inshore aquaculture practices. [23]

Pollution

One of the concerns with inshore farms is that discarded nutrients and feces can settle on the seafloor and disturb the benthos. [5] The "dilution of nutrients" that occurs in deeper water is a strong reason to move coastal aquaculture offshore into the open ocean. [24] How much nutrient pollution and damage to the seafloor occurs depends on the feed conversion efficiency of the species, the flushing rate and the size of the operation. [2] However, dissolved and particulate nutrients are still released to the environment. [16] Future offshore farms will probably be much larger than inshore farms today, and will therefore generate more waste. [17] The point at which the capacity of offshore ecosystems to assimilate waste from offshore aquaculture operations will be exceeded is yet to be defined. [17] [25]

Wild caught feed

As with the inshore aquaculture of carnivorous fish, a large proportion of the feed comes from wild forage fish. Except for a few countries, offshore aquaculture has focused predominantly on high value carnivorous fish. [7] If the industry attempts to expand with this focus then the supply of these wild fish will become ecologically unsustainable. [2]

Fish escapes

The expense of offshore systems means it is important to avoid fish escapes. [2] However, it is likely there will be escapes as the offshore industry expands. [2] This could have significant consequences for native species, even if the farmed fish are inside their native range. [2] Submersible cages are fully closed and therefore escapes can only occur through damage to the structure. Offshore cages must withstand the high energy of the environment and attacks by predators such as sharks. [13] The outer netting is made of Spectra – a super-strong polyethylene fibre – wrapped tightly around the frame, leaving no slack for predators to grip. [13] However, the fertilised eggs of cod are able to pass through the cage mesh in ocean enclosures. [26]

Disease

Compared to inshore aquaculture, disease problems currently appear to be much reduced when farming offshore. For example, parasitic infections that occur in mussels cultured offshore are much smaller than those cultured inshore. [14] However, new species are now being farmed offshore although little is known about their ecology and epidemiology. [2] The implications of transmitting pathogens between such farmed species and wild species "remains a large and unanswered question". [27]

Spreading of pathogens between fish stocks is a major issue in disease control. [27] Static offshore cages may help minimize direct spreading, as there may be greater distances between aquaculture production areas. However, development of roaming cage technology could bring about new issues with disease transfer and spread. The high level of carnivorous aquaculture production results in an increased demand for live aquatic animals for production and breeding purposes such as bait, broodstock and milt. This can result in spread of disease across species barriers. [27]

Employment

Aquaculture is encouraged by many governments as a way to generate jobs and income, particularly when wild fisheries have been run down. [2] However, this may not apply to offshore aquaculture. Offshore aquaculture entails high equipment and supply costs, and therefore will be under severe pressure to lower labor costs through automated production technologies. [7] Employment is likely to expand more at processing facilities than grow-out industries as offshore aquaculture develops. [2]

Prospects

As of 2008, Norway and the United States were making the main investments in the design of offshore cages. [28]

FAO

In 2010, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) sub-committee on aquaculture made the following assessments:

"Most Members thought it inevitable that aquaculture will move further offshore if the world is to meet its growing demand for seafood and urged the development of appropriate technologies for its expansion and assistance to developing countries in accessing them [...] Some Members noted that aquaculture may also develop offshore in large inland water bodies and discussion should extend to inland waters as well [...] Some Members suggested caution regarding potential negative impacts when developing offshore aquaculture. [29]

The sub-committee recommended the FAO "should work towards clarifying the technical and legal terminology related to offshore aquaculture in order to avoid confusion." [29]

Europe

In 2002, the European Commission issued the following policy statement on aquaculture: [30]

"Fish cages should be moved further from the coast, and more research and development of offshore cage technology must be promoted to this end. Experience from outside the aquaculture sector, e.g. with oil platforms, may well feed into the aquaculture equipment sector, allowing for savings in the development costs of technologies."

By 2008, European offshore systems were operating in Norway, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Malta, Croatia, Portugal and Libya. [3]

In Ireland, as part of their National Development Plan, it is envisioned that over the period 2007–2013, technology associated with offshore aquaculture systems will be developed, including: "sensor systems for feeding, biomass and health monitoring, feed control, telemetry and communications [and] cage design, materials, structural testing and modelling." [31]

United States

Moving aquaculture offshore into the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) can cause complications with regulations. In the United States, regulatory control of the coastal states generally extends to 3 nm, while federal waters (or EEZ) extend to 200 nm offshore. [10] Therefore, offshore aquaculture can be sited outside the reach of state law but within federal jurisdiction. [2] As of 2010, "all commercial aquaculture facilities have been sited in nearshore waters under state or territorial jurisdiction." [6] However, "unclear regulatory processes" and "technical uncertainties related to working in offshore areas" have hindered progress. [6] The five offshore research projects and commercial operations in the US – in New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, Hawaii and California – are all in federal waters. [10] In June 2011, the National Sustainable Offshore Aquaculture Act of 2011 was introduced to the House of Representatives "to establish a regulatory system and research program for sustainable offshore aquaculture in the United States exclusive economic zone". [32] [33]

Current species

By 2005, offshore aquaculture was present in 25 countries, both as experimental and commercial farms. [7] Market demand means that the most offshore farming efforts are directed towards raising finfish. [10] Two commercial operations in the US, and a third in the Bahamas are using submersible cages to raise high-value carnivorous finfish, such as moi, cobia, and mutton snapper. [2] Submersible cages are also being used in experimental systems for halibut, haddock, cod, and summer flounder in New Hampshire waters, and for amberjack, red drum, snapper, pompano, and cobia in the Gulf of Mexico. [2]

The offshore aquaculture of shellfish grown in suspended culture systems, like scallops and mussels, is gaining ground. Suspended culture systems include methods where the shellfish are grown on a tethered rope or suspended from a floating raft in net containers. [14] Mussels in particular can survive the high physical stress levels which occur in the volatile environments that occur in offshore waters. Finfish species must be feed regularly, but shellfish do not, which can reduce costs. [14] The University of New Hampshire in the US has conducted research on the farming of blue mussels submerged in an open ocean environment. [34] They have found that when farmed in less polluted waters offshore, [35] the mussels develop more flesh with lighter shells. [34]

Global status

Global status of offshore aquaculture
Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program [36]
LocationSpeciesStatusComment
AustraliatunaC10,000 tonnes/year worth A$250 million
Californiastriped bass, California yellowtail, Pacific halibut, abaloneE/CAttempts to produce from an oil platform
Canadacod, sablefish, mussels, salmonMussels established in eastern Canada
Canary Islandsseabass, seabreamTwo cages installed but not now used
Chinaunknown finfish, scallopsESmall scale experiments on finfish
CroatiatunaC8 offshore cages (1998)
Cyprusseabass, seabreamC8 offshore cages (1998)
Faeroe IslandFailed trials
Franceseabass, seabreamC13 offshore cages (1998)
Germanyseaweed, musselsETrials using wind-farms
Greeceseabass, seabreamC
Hawaiiamberjack, Pacific threadfinC
IrelandAtlantic salmonEVarious experimental projects
Italyseabass, seabream, tunaC
Japantuna, musselsCCommercial tuna ranching, offshore mussel long-lines.
Koreascallop
Maltaseabass, seabream, tunaC3 offshore cages (1998)
MexicotunaE
MoroccotunaC
New HampshireAtlantic halibut, cod, haddock, mussels, sea scallops, summer flounderE/CExperimental work from the University of New Hampshire, two commercial mussel sites
New ZealandmusselsAbout to become operational
PanamatunaC
Puerto Ricocobia, snapperC
Spainseabass, seabreamCGovernment assisting trials
Turkeyseabass, seabreamC
VietnambarramundiC
WashingtonsablefishC
TaiwancobiaC3,000 tonnes (2001)
Status: E = Experimental, C = Commercial

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ ASEAN Seafood Expo 2017 Conference & Activity Programme
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Naylor, R., and Burke, M. (2005) "Aquaculture and ocean resources: raising tigers of the sea" Archived 2010-07-16 at the Wayback Machine Annual Review of Environmental Resources,30:185–218.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Sturrock H, Newton R, Paffrath S, Bostock J, Muir J, Young J, Immink A and Dickson M (2008) Part 2: Characterisation of emerging aquaculture systems [ permanent dead link ] In: Prospective Analysis of the Aquaculture Sector in the EU, European Commission, EUR 23409 EN/2. ISBN   978-92-79-09442-2. doi : 10.2791/31843
  4. ↑ "Offshore aquaculture – DNV GL". DNV GL. Retrieved 2018-10-17.
  5. 1 2 Black KD, Hansen PK and Holmer M (2004) Working Group Report on Benthic Impacts and Farm Siting In: Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue, WWF.
  6. 1 2 3 Upton, F. U., Buck, E. H. (2010) Open ocean aquaculture Congressional Research Service, CRS Report for Congress.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Skladany, M., Clausen, R., Belton, B. (2007) "Offshore aquaculture: the frontier of redefining oceanic property" Society and Natural Resources, 20: 169–176.
  8. ↑ FAO. (2010) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture Rome. FAO, 2010, 197p.
  9. ↑ Hanson, J. A. (Ed.) (1974) Open sea mariculture: Perspectives, problems and prospects. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rubino, Michael (Ed.) (2008) Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities U.S. Department of Commerce; Silver Spring, MD; USA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103. 263p.
  11. ↑ Stickney, R. R., Costa-Pierce, B., Baltz, D. M., Drawbridge, M., Grimes, C., Phillips, S., Swann, D. L. (2006) "Towards sustainable open ocean aquaculture in the United States" Fisheries,31(12): 607–610.
  12. ↑ Cressey, D. (2009) "Future fish". Nature,458: 398–400.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mann, C. C. (2004) "The bluewater revolution" Wired Mag. 12.05.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Lado-Insua, T., Ocampo, F. J., Moran, K. (2009) "Offshore mussel aquaculture: new or just renewed?" Oceans ’09 IEEE Bremen: Balancing Technology with Future Needs, art. No. 5278263. [ permanent dead link ]
  15. ↑ Finfish aquaculture Archived 2011-10-13 at the Wayback Machine Atlantic Marine Aquaculture Center, University of New Hampshire. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
  16. 1 2 3 Carlsbad hatchery group proposes offshore aquaculture on oil platform Archived 2010-12-29 at the Wayback Machine North County Times, 19 June 2005.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Troell, M., Joyce, A., Chopin, T., Neori, A., Buschmann, A. H., Fang, J. (2009) "Ecological engineering in aquaculture – Potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems" Aquaculture,297: 1–9.
  18. ↑ Buck BH, Krause G and Rosenthal H (2004) "Extensive Open Ocean Aquaculture Development Within Wind Farms in Germany: The Prospect of Offshore Co-Management and Legal Constraints" Ocean & Coastal Management,47: 95–122
  19. 1 2 Grimes J (1999) "Competition for Common Property Space: New Hampshire's Recreational and Open Ocean Aquaculture. Development" Proceedings of the 1999 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, GTR-NE-269, pp. 378–383.
  20. ↑ Martinez-Cordero FJ (2007) "Socioeconomic Aspects of Species and Systems Selection for Sustainable Aquaculture" pp. 225–239. In: Leung P, Lee C and O'Bryen P (Eds.) Species and system selection for sustainable aquaculture, John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-8138-2691-2. doi : 10.1002/9780470277867.ch30
  21. ↑ Hoagland, P; Jin, D; Kite-Powell, H (2003). "The Optimal Allocation of Ocean Space: Aquaculture and Wild-Harvest Fisheries". Marine Resource Economics. 18 (2): 129–147. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.121.1327 . doi:10.1086/mre.18.2.42629389. S2CID   18826628.
  22. 1 2 Harte MJ, Campbell HV and Webster J (2010) "Looking for a safe harbor in a crowded sea: Coastal space use conflict and marine renewable energy development" Archived 2012-04-25 at the Wayback Machine In: Shifting Shorelines: Adapting to the Future,The 22nd International Conference of The Coastal Society.
  23. ↑ Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue "State of Information" Reports WWF , 2004.
  24. ↑ Simpson, S. (2011) "The blue food revolution" Scientific American,304(2): 54–61. doi : 10.1038/scientificamerican0211-54
  25. ↑ Marin, Arnaldo; Montoya, Sara; Vita, Rubén; Marín-Guirao, Lázaro; Lloret, Javier; Aguado, Felipe (October 2007). "Utility of sea urchin embryo–larval bioassays for assessing the environmental impact of marine fishcage farming". Aquaculture. 271 (1–4): 286–297. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.05.030. ISSN   0044-8486.
  26. ↑ Bekkevold, D., Hansen, M., Loeschcke, V. (2002) "Male reproductive competition in spawning aggregations of cod (Gardus morhua L.)" Archived 2012-04-25 at the Wayback Machine Molecular Ecology,11: 91–102.
  27. 1 2 3 Walker, P. (2004) "Disease emergence and food security: global impact of pathogens on sustainable aquaculture production" Presented at Fish, Aquaculture and Food Security: Sustaining Fish as a Food Supply, Canberra, Australia.
  28. ↑ Bostock J, Muir J, Young J, Newton R and Paffrath S (2008) Part 1: Synthesis report Archived 2012-04-25 at the Wayback Machine In: Prospective Analysis of the Aquaculture Sector in the EU, European Commission, EUR 23409 EN/1. ISBN   978-92-79-09441-5. doi : 10.2791/29677
  29. 1 2 FAO (2010) Report of the fifth session of the sub-committee on aquaculture Report 950, Rome. ISBN   978-92-5-006716-2.
  30. ↑ European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament – A Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture COM/2002/0511 Final, p.13.
  31. ↑ Sea Change (2007–2013) Part II: Marine Foresight Exercise for Ireland Archived 2007-11-20 at the Wayback Machine p. 107. Marine Institute, Ireland. ISBN   1-902895-32-0.
  32. ↑ National Sustainable Offshore Aquaculture Act of 2011 OpenCongress. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  33. ↑ New offshore aquaculture bill seeks to protect oceans Fis, 7 July 2011.
  34. 1 2 Shellfish aquaculture Archived 2011-10-13 at the Wayback Machine Atlantic Marine Aquaculture Center, University of New Hampshire. Retrieved 3 October 2011.
  35. ↑ NOAA research harvests a sustainable way to farm the deep blue NOAA Magazine, Story 161. Retrieved 3 October 2011.
  36. ↑ Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program p. 29. 2008. Twenty-Fifth Annual Technical Report. Aquaculture CRSP, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. Vol II, 288pp.

Further references

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture</span> Farming of aquatic organisms

Aquaculture, also known as aquafarming, is the controlled cultivation ("farming") of aquatic organisms such as fish, crustaceans, mollusks, algae and other organisms of value such as aquatic plants. Aquaculture involves cultivating freshwater, brackish water, and saltwater populations under controlled or semi-natural and can be contrasted with commercial fishing, which is the harvesting of wild fish. Aquaculture is also a practice used for restoring and rehabilitating marine and freshwater ecosystems. Mariculture, commonly known as marine farming, is aquaculture in seawater habitats and lagoons, as opposed to freshwater aquaculture. Pisciculture is a type of aquaculture that consists of fish farming to obtain fish products as food.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mariculture</span> Cultivation of marine organisms in saltwater environments

Mariculture, sometimes called marine farming or marine aquaculture, is a branch of aquaculture involving the cultivation of marine organisms for food and other animal products, in seawater. Subsets of it include, fish farms built on littoral waters, or in artificial tanks, ponds or raceways which are filled with seawater. An example of the latter is the farming of plankton and seaweed, shellfish like shrimp or oysters, and marine finfish, in saltwater ponds. Non-food products produced by mariculture include: fish meal, nutrient agar, jewellery, and cosmetics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fish farming</span> Raising fish commercially in enclosures

Fish farming or pisciculture involves commercial breeding of fish, most often for food, in fish tanks or artificial enclosures such as fish ponds. It is a particular type of aquaculture, which is the controlled cultivation and harvesting of aquatic animals such as fish, crustaceans, molluscs and so on, in natural or pseudo-natural environments. A facility that releases juvenile fish into the wild for recreational fishing or to supplement a species' natural numbers is generally referred to as a fish hatchery. Worldwide, the most important fish species produced in fish farming are carp, catfish, salmon and tilapia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fishery</span> Raising or harvesting fish

Fishery can mean either the enterprise of raising or harvesting fish and other aquatic life or, more commonly, the site where such enterprise takes place. Commercial fisheries include wild fisheries and fish farms, both in freshwater waterbodies and the oceans. About 500 million people worldwide are economically dependent on fisheries. 171 million tonnes of fish were produced in 2016, but overfishing is an increasing problem, causing declines in some populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cobia</span> Species of fish

The cobia is a species of carangiform marine fish, the only extant representative of the genus Rachycentron and the family Rachycentridae. Its other common names include black kingfish, black salmon, ling, lemonfish, crabeater, prodigal son, codfish, and black bonito.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fish hatchery</span> Aquaculture facility

A fish hatchery is a place for artificial breeding, hatching, and rearing through the early life stages of animals—finfish and shellfish in particular. Hatcheries produce larval and juvenile fish, shellfish, and crustaceans, primarily to support the aquaculture industry where they are transferred to on-growing systems, such as fish farms, to reach harvest size. Some species that are commonly raised in hatcheries include Pacific oysters, shrimp, Indian prawns, salmon, tilapia and scallops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture</span> Type of aquaculture

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) is a type of aquaculture where the byproducts, including waste, from one aquatic species are used as inputs for another. Farmers combine fed aquaculture with inorganic extractive and organic extractive aquaculture to create balanced systems for environment remediation (biomitigation), economic stability and social acceptability.

This is a glossary of terms used in fisheries, fisheries management and fisheries science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fishing industry in the United States</span>

As with other countries, the 200 nautical miles (370 km) exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the coast of the United States gives its fishing industry special fishing rights. It covers 11.4 million square kilometres, which is the second largest zone in the world, exceeding the land area of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture in New Zealand</span>

Aquaculture started to take off in New Zealand in the 1980s. It is dominated by mussels, oysters and salmon. In 2007, aquaculture generated about NZ$360 million in sales on an area of 7,700 hectares. $240 million was earned in exports.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture in Australia</span> On a steady increase since 1970 accounting for 34% of seafood

Aquaculture in Australia is the country's fastest-growing primary industry, accounting for 34% of the total gross value of production of seafood. 10 species of fish are farmed in Australia, and production is dominated by southern bluefin tuna, Atlantic salmon and barramundi. Mud crabs have also been cultivated in Australia for many years, sometimes leading to over-exploitation. Traditionally, this aquaculture was limited to table oysters and pearls, but since the early 1970s, there has been significant research and commercial development of other forms of aquaculture, including finfish, crustaceans, and molluscs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture of salmonids</span> Fish farming and harvesting under controlled conditions

The aquaculture of salmonids is the farming and harvesting of salmonid fish under controlled conditions for both commercial and recreational purposes. Salmonids, along with carp and tilapia, are the three most important fish groups in aquaculture. The most commonly commercially farmed salmonid is the Atlantic salmon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture in China</span>

China, with one-fifth of the world's population, accounts for two-thirds of the world's reported aquaculture production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fishing industry in Pakistan</span> Overview of fishing in Pakistan

The fishing industry plays a significant part in the national economy of Pakistan. With a coastline of about 1,120 km, Pakistan has enough fishery resources that remain to be developed. Most of the population of the coastal areas of Sindh and Balochistan depends on fisheries for livelihood. It is also a major source of export earning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture in Canada</span>

Aquaculture is the farming of fish, shellfish or aquatic plants in either fresh or saltwater, or both. The farmed animals or plants are cared for under a controlled environment to ensure optimum growth, success and profit. When they have reached an appropriate size, they are harvested, processed, and shipped to markets to be sold. Aquaculture is practiced all over the world and is extremely popular in countries such as China, where population is high and fish is a staple part of their everyday diet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture in South Korea</span>

South Korea is a major center of aquaculture production, and the world's third largest producer of farmed algae as of 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture of cobia</span>

Cobia, a warm water fish, is one of the more suitable candidates for offshore aquaculture. Cobia are large pelagic fish, up to 2 metres (6.6 ft) long and 68 kilograms (150 lb) in weight. They are solitary fish except when spawning, found in warm-temperate to tropical waters.

Aquaculture in Madagascar started to take off in the 1980s. The industry includes the cultivation of sea cucumbers, seaweed, fish and shrimp and is being used to stimulate the country's economy, increase the wages of fishermen and women, and improve the regions ocean water quality. Coastal regions of Madagascar are reliant on the Indian Ocean's marine resources as a source of food, income, and cultural identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquaculture in the United Kingdom</span>

Aquaculture in the United Kingdom is dominated by salmon farming, then by mussel production with trout being the third most important enterprise. Aquaculture in the United Kingdom represents a significant business for the UK, producing over 200,000 tonnes of fish whilst earning over £700 million in 2012 (€793 million).

Fish farming is a major economic contributor to South Australia's seafood sector. The most valuable species is the Southern bluefin tuna, which is caught in the wild then transferred into sea cages in southern Spencer Gulf where they are fed locally caught sardines. The second most valuable species is the Yellowtail kingfish, which is farmed near Port Lincoln and Arno Bay. A tourist venture called Oceanic Victor located in Encounter Bay allows paying customers the opportunity to swim in a sea cage with the Southern bluefin tuna and handfeed the fish. Prominent companies in the fish farming sector in South Australia include Clean Seas and Tony's Tuna International.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.