Peccatism

Last updated

Peccatism refers to the concept in Christian theology that human beings are naturally sinful or morally flawed. It is discussed within Christianity, emphasizing the inherent sinfulness of humanity and the need for redemption. [1] Peccatism is closely related to, but not exactly the same as, the doctrine of original sin. Peccatism includes both inherited sin and ongoing sinful behavior.

Contents

Etymology

The term "peccatism" is derived from the Latin word peccatum, meaning "sin." [2] The root "pecc-" appears in several other English words, such as "peccant," which describes something sinful or morally wrong, and "impeccable," which means without fault or sin. [3] The suffix "-ism" denotes a doctrine or belief system, thus forming the term "peccatism" to describe the belief in the inherent sinfulness of human beings.[ citation needed ]

Background and historical context

Since its inception, sin has been a central theme in Christianity. The concept of peccatism, which is intertwined with the doctrine of original sin, [4] was notably articulated by Augustine of Hippo in the 4th and 5th centuries. Augustine's interpretation of original sin suggests that all humans inherit a sinful nature due to the fall of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. [5]

Augustine's views have had a significant impact on Western Christianity, shaping both Roman Catholic and Protestant doctrines. [6] During the 16th century Reformation, reformers such as Martin Luther and John Calvin further developed the concept of original sin. Calvin's doctrine of total depravity, a key element of Calvinism, aligns with peccatism by emphasizing that human nature is thoroughly affected by sin and that humans cannot achieve righteousness on their own. [7]

In contrast, the earliest Christian thinkers, known as the Apostolic Fathers, did not view sin as an inherent and overwhelming aspect of human nature. They believed that sin was acquired through personal choices and actions, emphasizing the role of reason and moral effort in achieving salvation. [8] Gnosticism presents a distinct view, considering peccatism a deliberate rebellion against the demiurge, the malevolent creator of the material world. Gnostics believe that sinning undermines the demiurge's authority, with salvation achieved through gnosis rather than moral conduct. [2]

Definition and nature of sin

In Christian theology, sin is considered a fundamental problem affecting humanity. It encompasses actions, thoughts, and intentions that deviate from moral and divine standards. Sin manifests in various forms and is often described using terms such as iniquity, corruption, rebellion, and evil. [9]

Sin is defined as any attitude or act in which one rebels against or fails to respond adequately to the love commandment of Jesus. [10] It is further described as self-love and self-centeredness, the opposite of Jesus' love commandment, with the assertion that to be a sinner in God's eyes requires enough maturity, knowledge, and freedom to make moral choices. [10]

Forms and examples of sin

Christianity identifies various forms and examples of sin, including transgression, which involves violating a rule or law; [11] witchcraft, which is viewed as practicing magic; [12] and abomination, which involves engaging in detestable actions. [13] Additionally, sin includes wickedness, exhibited as evil behavior; [14] unrighteousness, which involves acting unfairly or unjustly; [15] and immorality, defined as conducting oneself in unethical or wrong ways. [16] Sin also encompasses omission, the failure to do what is morally right; [17] harboring inappropriate thoughts, often referred to as dirty thoughts; [18] and unbelief, which is the lack of faith in God. [19]

The human condition

Peccatism suggests that all humans are inherently sinful. This idea aligns with the Christian doctrine of original sin, which posits that humanity inherited a sinful nature from the first humans, Adam and Eve. [20] However, peccatism is broader than the concept of original sin. While original sin refers specifically to the inherited sinfulness from Adam and Eve, peccatism encompasses both this inherited nature and the active participation in sinful acts throughout a person's life. [21]

Divine requirements

It is believed that God demands three main things from humanity to address the problem of sin. First, sinless perfection, which means living a life completely free from sin. [22] Second, a blood sacrifice, which involves offering a sacrifice to atone for sins. [23] Third, faith, which is believing and trusting in God's plan for salvation. [24] These requirements underscore the belief in the necessity of Jesus Christ's sacrificial death and resurrection for the forgiveness of sins. [25]

Redemption through Jesus Christ

In Christianity, the cross is a central symbol, representing Jesus's death as a substitutionary atonement for the sins of humanity. [26] Christians believe that Jesus, who was sinless, took on the punishment for human sins, offering redemption and the promise of eternal life to those who have faith in him. [27]

Implications of peccatism

Humans are considered morally accountable to God for their sins. Recognizing one's sinful nature is seen as the first step towards repentance and seeking forgiveness through Jesus Christ. [28] Faith is essential for accepting Jesus Christ's sacrifice and receiving forgiveness. It involves trusting in God's grace and striving to live according to Christian principles. [29] Understanding peccatism motivates believers to pursue ethical living, which involves avoiding sinful behaviors and cultivating virtues in alignment with Christian teachings. [30] Peccatism highlights the belief in the human need for a savior. Redemption through Jesus Christ offers hope and transformation, allowing believers to overcome their sinful nature and aspire to live a life pleasing to God. [31]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Original sin</span> Christian doctrine about human nature

Original sin is the Christian doctrine that holds that humans, through the act of birth, inherit a tainted nature with a proclivity to sinful conduct in need of regeneration. The biblical basis for the belief is generally found in Genesis 3, in a line in Psalm 51:5, and in Paul's Epistle to the Romans, 5:12-21.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predestination</span> Doctrine in Christian theology

Predestination, in theology, is the doctrine that all events have been willed by God, usually with reference to the eventual fate of the individual soul. Explanations of predestination often seek to address the paradox of free will, whereby God's omniscience seems incompatible with human free will. In this usage, predestination can be regarded as a form of religious determinism; and usually predeterminism, also known as theological determinism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Total depravity</span> Protestant theological doctrine

Total depravity is a Protestant theological doctrine derived from the concept of original sin. It teaches that, as a consequence of the Fall, every person born into the world is enslaved to the service of sin as a result of their fallen nature and, apart from the efficacious (irresistible) or prevenient (enabling) grace of God, is completely unable to choose by themselves to follow God, refrain from evil, or accept the gift of salvation as it is offered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predestination in Calvinism</span> Theological doctrine

Predestination is a doctrine in Calvinism dealing with the question of the control that God exercises over the world. In the words of the Westminster Confession of Faith, God "freely and unchangeably ordained whatsoever comes to pass." The second use of the word "predestination" applies this to salvation, and refers to the belief that God appointed the eternal destiny of some to salvation by grace, while leaving the remainder to receive eternal damnation for all their sins, even their original sin. The former is called "unconditional election", and the latter "reprobation". In Calvinism, some people are predestined and effectually called in due time to faith by God, all others are reprobated.

In Christian theology, divinization, or theopoesis or theosis, is the transforming effect of divine grace, the spirit of God, or the atonement of Christ. Although it literally means to become divine, or to become God, most modern Christian denominations do not interpret the doctrine as implying an overcoming of a fundamental ontological difference between God and humanity; for example, John of the Cross indicated that while "God communicates to it [the individual soul] His supernatural Being, in such wise that it appears to be God Himself, and has all that God Himself has", yet "it is true that its natural being, though thus transformed, is as distinct from the Being of God as it was before".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salvation in Christianity</span> Saving of people from sin in Christianity

In Christianity, salvation is the saving of human beings from sin and its consequences—which include death and separation from God—by Christ's death and resurrection, and the justification entailed by this salvation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Justification (theology)</span> Concept of Christian theology

In Christian theology, justification is the event or process by which sinners are made or declared to be righteous in the sight of God.

In Christianity, Neo-orthodoxy or Neoorthodoxy, also known as theology of crisis and dialectical theology, was a theological movement developed in the aftermath of the First World War. The movement was largely a reaction against doctrines of 19th century liberal theology and a reevaluation of the teachings of the Reformation. Karl Barth is the leading figure associated with the movement. In the U.S., Reinhold Niebuhr was a leading exponent of neo-orthodoxy. It is unrelated to Eastern Orthodoxy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Satisfaction theory of atonement</span> Christian theory of atonement

The satisfaction theory of atonement is a theory in Catholic theology which holds that Jesus Christ redeemed humanity through making satisfaction for humankind's disobedience through his own supererogatory obedience. The theory draws primarily from the works of Anselm of Canterbury, specifically his Cur Deus Homo. Since one of God's characteristics is justice, affronts to that justice must be atoned for. It is thus connected with the legal concept of balancing out an injustice.

Criticism of the Seventh-day Adventist Church includes observations made about its teachings, structure, and practices or theological disagreements from various individuals and groups.

Christian realism is a political theology in the Christian tradition. It is built on three biblical presumptions: the sinfulness of humanity, the freedom of humanity, and the validity and seriousness of the Great Commandment. The key political concepts of Christian realism are balance of power and political responsibility. This political-theological perspective is most closely associated with the work of the 20th-century American theologian and public intellectual Reinhold Niebuhr. Niebuhr argued that the Kingdom of God cannot be realized on earth because of the innately corrupt tendencies of society. Due to the injustices that arise among people, we must be willing to compromise the ideal of Kingdom of Heaven on earth. Niebuhr argued that human perfectibility was an illusion, highlighting the sinfulness of humanity by naming labor disputes and race riots in industrial hubs like Detroit, Michigan where he pastored, the horrors of the Second World War, the Communist and Fascist totalitarian regimes, and the Holocaust. Christian realism was in part a reaction to the 20th-century Social Gospel movement.

Eastern Orthodox theology is the theology particular to the Eastern Orthodox Church. It is characterized by monotheistic Trinitarianism, belief in the Incarnation of the divine Logos or only-begotten Son of God, cataphatic theology with apophatic theology, a hermeneutic defined by a Sacred Tradition, a catholic ecclesiology, a theology of the person, and a principally recapitulative and therapeutic soteriology.

Free will in theology is an important part of the debate on free will in general. Religions vary greatly in their response to the standard argument against free will and thus might appeal to any number of responses to the paradox of free will, the claim that omniscience and free will are incompatible.

The theology of the Seventh-day Adventist Church resembles early Protestant Christianity, combining elements from Lutheran, Wesleyan-Arminian, and Anabaptist branches of Protestantism. Adventists believe in the infallibility of the Scripture's teaching regarding salvation, which comes from grace through faith in Jesus Christ. The 28 fundamental beliefs constitute the church's current doctrinal positions, but they are revisable under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and are not a creed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penal substitution</span> Postulation about the significance of Christs death

Penal substitution, also called penal substitutionary atonement and especially in older writings forensic theory, is a theory of the atonement within Protestant Christian theology, which declares that Christ, voluntarily submitting to God the Father's plan, was punished (penalized) in the place of (substitution) sinners, thus satisfying the demands of justice and propitiation, so God can justly forgive sins making us at one with God (atonement). It began with the German Reformation leader Martin Luther and continued to develop within the Calvinist tradition as a specific understanding of substitutionary atonement. The penal model teaches that the substitutionary nature of Jesus' death is understood in the sense of a substitutionary fulfilment of legal demands for the offenses of sins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christian views on sin</span> Viewpoints of sin according to the Bible

In Christianity, sin is an immoral act and transgression of divine law. The doctrine of sin is central to the Christian faith, since its basic message is about redemption in Christ.

Christian theology is the theology – the systematic study of the divine and religion – of Christian belief and practice. It concentrates primarily upon the texts of the Old Testament and of the New Testament, as well as on Christian tradition. Christian theologians use biblical exegesis, rational analysis and argument. Theologians may undertake the study of Christian theology for a variety of reasons, such as in order to:

<i>Theosis</i> (Eastern Christian theology) Likeness to or union with God

Theosis, or deification, is a transformative process whose aim is likeness to or union with God, as taught by the Eastern Catholic Churches and the Eastern Orthodox Church; the same concept is also found in the Latin Church of the Catholic Church, where it is termed "divinization". As a process of transformation, theosis is brought about by the effects of catharsis and theoria. According to Eastern Christian teachings, theosis is very much the purpose of human life. It is considered achievable only through synergy of human activity and God's uncreated energies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Augustinian theodicy</span> Type of Christian theodicy designed in response to the evidential problem of evil

The Augustinian theodicy, named for the 4th- and 5th-century theologian and philosopher Augustine of Hippo, is a type of Christian theodicy that developed in response to the evidential problem of evil. As such, it attempts to explain the probability of an omnipotent (all-powerful) and omnibenevolent (all-loving) God amid evidence of evil in the world. A number of variations of this kind of theodicy have been proposed throughout history; their similarities were first described by the 20th-century philosopher John Hick, who classified them as "Augustinian". They typically assert that God is perfectly (ideally) good, that he created the world out of nothing, and that evil is the result of humanity's original sin. The entry of evil into the world is generally explained as consequence of original sin and its continued presence due to humans' misuse of free will and concupiscence. God's goodness and benevolence, according to the Augustinian theodicy, remain perfect and without responsibility for evil or suffering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Augustinianism</span> Philosophical and theological system

Augustinianism is the philosophical and theological system of Augustine of Hippo and its subsequent development by other thinkers, notably Boethius, Anselm of Canterbury and Bonaventure. Among Augustine's most important works are The City of God, De doctrina Christiana, and Confessions.

References

  1. ↑ Idrisi, F. (2022). "Christian Ethics: A Review from the Perspective of Al-Faruqi". Journal of Fatwa Management and Research. 27 (2): 1–9. doi: 10.33102/jfatwa.vol27no2.433 .
  2. 1 2 Walker, Benjamin (1983). Gnosticism: Its History and Influence. The Aquarian Press. pp. 102–104. ISBN   0850303559.
  3. ↑ "Peccant". Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper. c. 1600. Retrieved 14 July 2024.
  4. ↑ Pelikan, Jaroslav (1971). The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600). The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine. Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press. pp. 299–300.
  5. ↑ Augustine (426). The City of God. Penguin Classics. p. 15. ISBN   9780140448948.
  6. ↑ Brown, Peter (2000). Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. University of California Press. p. 78. ISBN   9780520227576.
  7. ↑ Muller, Richard A. (2000). The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition. Oxford University Press. p. 166. ISBN   9780195151688. Calvin is not, however, interested in elaborating an analysis of the freedom of the will or of its relative primacy over the intellect: instead, he inquires into the problem of human inability to will the good, the problem of the restriction of free choice. Human beings are 'not deprived of will' (non voluntate privatus) but they are deprived of soundness of will (voluntatis sanitate). Like Augustine and Luther, Calvin does not deny the basic freedom of will: the faculty is free from external compulsion, although it operates under certain necessities belonging to its nature, whether under God or under sin. He therefore argues the restriction of choice to sinful choice.
  8. ↑ al-Faruqi, Isma'il (1968). C. J. Bleeker (ed.). Original Sin in the Apostolic Fathers. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, vol. II, Guilt or Pollution and Rites of Purification. Brill. pp. 93–94.
  9. ↑ Plantinga, Cornelius Jr. (1995). Not the Way It's Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 22. ISBN   9780802842183.
  10. 1 2 Harkness, Georgia Elma (1952). Christian Ethics. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press. p. 95.
  11. ↑ Ricoeur, Paul (1967). The Symbolism of Evil. Beacon Press. p. 45. ISBN   9780807015674. OCLC   22867775.
  12. ↑ Levack, Brian P. (2015). The Witch-Hunt in Early Modern Europe. Routledge. p. 67. ISBN   9781138808102.
  13. ↑ Boyarin, Daniel (1995). Carnal Israel: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture. University of California Press. p. 90.
  14. ↑ Cavanaugh, William T. (2009). The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. Oxford University Press. p. 123. ISBN   9780195385045.
  15. ↑ Plantinga, Cornelius Jr. (1995). Not the Way It's Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 64. ISBN   9780802842183.
  16. ↑ Niebuhr, Reinhold (1996). The Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 87. ISBN   9780664257095.
  17. ↑ Milgrom, Jacob (2021). Leviticus 17-22: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Yale University Press. p. 108. ISBN   9780300262001.
  18. ↑ Foucault, Michel (1990). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Vintage Books. p. 142. ISBN   9780679724698.
  19. ↑ Smith, Wilfred Cantwell (1998). Faith and Belief: The Difference Between Them. Oneworld Publications. p. 78. ISBN   9781851681655.
  20. ↑ Niebuhr, Reinhold (1996). The Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 55. ISBN   9780664257095.
  21. ↑ Niebuhr, Reinhold (1996). The Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 63. ISBN   9780664257095.
  22. ↑ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich (1959). The Cost of Discipleship. NY: Collier Books. p. 35. OCLC   1028575481.
  23. ↑ Westermann, Claus (1980). The Promises to the Fathers: Studies on the Patriarchal Narratives. Fortress Press. p. 50. ISBN   9780800605339.
  24. ↑ Tillich, Paul (1957). Dynamics of Faith. Harper & Row. p. 77. ISBN   9780060937133.
  25. ↑ Stott, John R.W. (2006). The Cross of Christ. InterVarsity Press. p. 98. ISBN   9780830833207.
  26. ↑ Green, Joel B. (1988). The Death of Jesus: Tradition and Interpretation in the Passion Narrative. Mohr Siebeck. p. 36. ISBN   9783161574542.
  27. ↑ McGrath, Alister E. (2016). Christian Theology: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 112. ISBN   9781118869574.
  28. ↑ Niebuhr, Reinhold (1996). The Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 147. ISBN   9780664257095.
  29. ↑ Barth, Karl (2004). Church Dogmatics, Volume IV: The Doctrine of Reconciliation. T&T Clark. p. 201. ISBN   9780567251558.
  30. ↑ Yoder, John Howard (1994). The Politics of Jesus. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 153. ISBN   9780802807342.
  31. ↑ Lewis, C.S. (2001). Mere Christianity. HarperOne. pp. 47–48. ISBN   9780060652920. But supposing God became a man—suppose our human nature which can suffer and die was amalgamated with God's nature in one person—then that person could help us. He could surrender His will, and suffer and die, because He was man; and He could do it perfectly because He was God. You and I can go through this process only if God does it in us; but God can do it only if He becomes man. Our attempts at this dying will succeed only if we men share in God's dying, just as our thinking can succeed only because it is a drop out of the ocean of His intelligence: but we cannot share God's dying unless God dies; and He cannot die except by being a man. That is the sense in which He pays our debt, and suffers for us what He Himself need not suffer at all
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.