Progress in artificial intelligence

Last updated
Progress in machine classification of images The error rate of AI by year. Red line - the error rate of a trained human on a particular task. Classification of images progress human.png
Progress in machine classification of images
The error rate of AI by year. Red line - the error rate of a trained human on a particular task.

Progress in artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the advances, milestones, and breakthroughs that have been achieved in the field of artificial intelligence over time. AI is a multidisciplinary branch of computer science that aims to create machines and systems capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence. AI applications have been used in a wide range of fields including medical diagnosis, finance, robotics, law, video games, agriculture, and scientific discovery. However, many AI applications are not perceived as AI: "A lot of cutting-edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough it's not labeled AI anymore." [1] [2] "Many thousands of AI applications are deeply embedded in the infrastructure of every industry." [3] In the late 1990s and early 2000s, AI technology became widely used as elements of larger systems, [3] [4] but the field was rarely credited for these successes at the time.

Contents

Kaplan and Haenlein structure artificial intelligence along three evolutionary stages:

  1. Artificial narrow intelligence – AI capable only of specific tasks;
  2. Artificial general intelligence – AI with ability in several areas, and able to autonomously solve problems they were never even designed for;
  3. Artificial superintelligence – AI capable of general tasks, including scientific creativity, social skills, and general wisdom. [2]

To allow comparison with human performance, artificial intelligence can be evaluated on constrained and well-defined problems. Such tests have been termed subject-matter expert Turing tests. Also, smaller problems provide more achievable goals and there are an ever-increasing number of positive results.

Humans still substantially outperform both GPT-4 and models trained on the ConceptARC benchmark that scored 60% on most, and 77% on one category, while humans 91% on all and 97% on one category. [5]

Current performance in specific areas

GameChampion year [6] Legal states (log10) [7] Game tree complexity (log10) [7] Game of perfect information?Ref.
Draughts (checkers)19942131Perfect [8]
Othello (reversi)19972858Perfect [9]
Chess 199746123Perfect
Scrabble 2006 [10]
Shogi 201771226Perfect [11]
Go 2017172360Perfect
2p no-limit hold 'em 2017Imperfect [12]
StarCraft -270+Imperfect [13]
StarCraft II 2019Imperfect [14]

There are many useful abilities that can be described as showing some form of intelligence. This gives better insight into the comparative success of artificial intelligence in different areas.

AI, like electricity or the steam engine, is a general-purpose technology. There is no consensus on how to characterize which tasks AI tends to excel at. [15] Some versions of Moravec's paradox observe that humans are more likely to outperform machines in areas such as physical dexterity that have been the direct target of natural selection. [16] While projects such as AlphaZero have succeeded in generating their own knowledge from scratch, many other machine learning projects require large training datasets. [17] [18] Researcher Andrew Ng has suggested, as a "highly imperfect rule of thumb", that "almost anything a typical human can do with less than one second of mental thought, we can probably now or in the near future automate using AI." [19]

Games provide a high-profile benchmark for assessing rates of progress; many games have a large professional player base and a well-established competitive rating system. AlphaGo brought the era of classical board-game benchmarks to a close when Artificial Intelligence proved their competitive edge over humans in 2016. Deep Mind's AlphaGo AI software program defeated the world's best professional Go Player Lee Sedol. [20] Games of imperfect knowledge provide new challenges to AI in the area of game theory; the most prominent milestone in this area was brought to a close by Libratus' poker victory in 2017. [21] [22] E-sports continue to provide additional benchmarks; Facebook AI, Deepmind, and others have engaged with the popular StarCraft franchise of videogames. [23] [24]

Broad classes of outcome for an AI test may be given as:

Optimal

Super-human

High-human

Par-human

Sub-human

Proposed tests of artificial intelligence

In his famous Turing test, Alan Turing picked language, the defining feature of human beings, for its basis. [66] The Turing test is now considered too exploitable to be a meaningful benchmark. [67]

The Feigenbaum test, proposed by the inventor of expert systems, tests a machine's knowledge and expertise about a specific subject. [68] A paper by Jim Gray of Microsoft in 2003 suggested extending the Turing test to speech understanding, speaking and recognizing objects and behavior. [69]

Proposed "universal intelligence" tests aim to compare how well machines, humans, and even non-human animals perform on problem sets that are generic as possible. At an extreme, the test suite can contain every possible problem, weighted by Kolmogorov complexity; however, these problem sets tend to be dominated by impoverished pattern-matching exercises where a tuned AI can easily exceed human performance levels. [70] [71] [72] [73] [74]

Exams

According to OpenAI, in 2023 ChatGPT GPT-4 scored the 90th percentile on the Uniform Bar Exam. On the SATs, GPT-4 scored the 89th percentile on math, and the 93rd percentile in Reading & Writing. On the GREs, it scored on the 54th percentile on the writing test, 88th percentile on the quantitative section, and 99th percentile on the verbal section. It scored in the 99th to 100th percentile on the 2020 USA Biology Olympiad semifinal exam. It scored a perfect "5" on several AP exams. [75]

Independent researchers found in 2023 that ChatGPT GPT-3.5 "performed at or near the passing threshold" for the three parts of the United States Medical Licensing Examination. GPT-3.5 was also assessed to attain a low, but passing, grade from exams for four law school courses at the University of Minnesota. [75] GPT-4 passed a text-based radiology board–style examination. [76] [77]

Competitions

Many competitions and prizes, such as the Imagenet Challenge, promote research in artificial intelligence. The most common areas of competition include general machine intelligence, conversational behavior, data-mining, robotic cars, and robot soccer as well as conventional games. [78]

Past and current predictions

An expert poll around 2016, conducted by Katja Grace of the Future of Humanity Institute and associates, gave median estimates of 3 years for championship Angry Birds , 4 years for the World Series of Poker, and 6 years for StarCraft. On more subjective tasks, the poll gave 6 years for folding laundry as well as an average human worker, 7–10 years for expertly answering 'easily Googleable' questions, 8 years for average speech transcription, 9 years for average telephone banking, and 11 years for expert songwriting, but over 30 years for writing a New York Times bestseller or winning the Putnam math competition. [79] [80] [81]

Chess

Deep Blue at the Computer History Museum Deep Blue.jpg
Deep Blue at the Computer History Museum

An AI defeated a grandmaster in a regulation tournament game for the first time in 1988; rebranded as Deep Blue, it beat the reigning human world chess champion in 1997 (see Deep Blue versus Garry Kasparov). [82]

Estimates when computers would exceed humans at Chess
Year prediction madePredicted yearNumber of yearsPredictorContemporaneous source
19571967 or sooner10 or less Herbert A. Simon, economist [83]
19902000 or sooner10 or less Ray Kurzweil, futurist Age of Intelligent Machines [84]

Go

AlphaGo defeated a European Go champion in October 2015, and Lee Sedol in March 2016, one of the world's top players (see AlphaGo versus Lee Sedol). According to Scientific American and other sources, most observers had expected superhuman Computer Go performance to be at least a decade away. [85] [86] [87]

Estimates when computers would exceed humans at Go
Year prediction madePredicted yearNumber of yearsPredictorAffiliationContemporaneous source
19972100 or later103 or morePiet Hutt, physicist and Go fan Institute for Advanced Study New York Times [88] [89]
20072017 or sooner10 or less Feng-Hsiung Hsu, Deep Blue leadMicrosoft Research Asia IEEE Spectrum [90] [91]
2014202410 Rémi Coulom, Computer Go programmer CrazyStone Wired [91] [92]

Human-level artificial general intelligence (AGI)

AI pioneer and economist Herbert A. Simon inaccurately predicted in 1965: "Machines will be capable, within twenty years, of doing any work a man can do". Similarly, in 1970 Marvin Minsky wrote that "Within a generation... the problem of creating artificial intelligence will substantially be solved." [93]

Four polls conducted in 2012 and 2013 suggested that the median estimate among experts for when AGI would arrive was 2040 to 2050, depending on the poll. [94] [95]

The Grace poll around 2016 found results varied depending on how the question was framed. Respondents asked to estimate "when unaided machines can accomplish every task better and more cheaply than human workers" gave an aggregated median answer of 45 years and a 10% chance of it occurring within 9 years. Other respondents asked to estimate "when all occupations are fully automatable. That is, when for any occupation, machines could be built to carry out the task better and more cheaply than human workers" estimated a median of 122 years and a 10% probability of 20 years. The median response for when "AI researcher" could be fully automated was around 90 years. No link was found between seniority and optimism, but Asian researchers were much more optimistic than North American researchers on average; Asians predicted 30 years on average for "accomplish every task", compared with the 74 years predicted by North Americans. [79] [80] [81]

Estimates of when AGI will arrive
Year prediction madePredicted yearNumber of yearsPredictorContemporaneous source
19651985 or sooner20 or lessHerbert A. SimonThe shape of automation for men and management [93] [96]
19932023 or sooner30 or less Vernor Vinge, science fiction writer"The Coming Technological Singularity" [97]
19952040 or sooner45 or less Hans Moravec, robotics researcherWired [98]
2008Never / Distant future [note 1] Gordon E. Moore, inventor of Moore's Law IEEE Spectrum [99]
2017202912Ray KurzweilInterview [100]

See also

Related Research Articles

Artificial intelligence (AI), in its broadest sense, is intelligence exhibited by machines, particularly computer systems. It is a field of research in computer science that develops and studies methods and software that enable machines to perceive their environment and use learning and intelligence to take actions that maximize their chances of achieving defined goals. Such machines may be called AIs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ELIZA</span> Early natural language processing computer program

ELIZA is an early natural language processing computer program developed from 1964 to 1967 at MIT by Joseph Weizenbaum. Created to explore communication between humans and machines, ELIZA simulated conversation by using a pattern matching and substitution methodology that gave users an illusion of understanding on the part of the program, but had no representation that could be considered really understanding what was being said by either party. Whereas the ELIZA program itself was written (originally) in MAD-SLIP, the pattern matching directives that contained most of its language capability were provided in separate "scripts", represented in a lisp-like representation. The most famous script, DOCTOR, simulated a psychotherapist of the Rogerian school, and used rules, dictated in the script, to respond with non-directional questions to user inputs. As such, ELIZA was one of the first chatterbots and one of the first programs capable of attempting the Turing test.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chatbot</span> Program that simulates conversation

A chatbot is a software application or web interface that is designed to mimic human conversation through text or voice interactions. Modern chatbots are typically online and use generative artificial intelligence systems that are capable of maintaining a conversation with a user in natural language and simulating the way a human would behave as a conversational partner. Such chatbots often use deep learning and natural language processing, but simpler chatbots have existed for decades.

A CAPTCHA is a type of challenge–response test used in computing to determine whether the user is human in order to deter bot attacks and spam.

Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that matches or surpasses human cognitive capabilities across a wide range of cognitive tasks. This contrasts with narrow AI, which is limited to specific tasks. Artificial superintelligence (ASI), on the other hand, refers to AGI that greatly exceeds human cognitive capabilities. AGI is considered one of the definitions of strong AI.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demis Hassabis</span> British artificial intelligence researcher (born 1976)

Sir Demis Hassabis is a British artificial intelligence (AI) researcher, and entrepreneur. He is the chief executive officer and co-founder of Google DeepMind, and Isomorphic Labs, and a UK Government AI Adviser. In 2024, Hassabis and John M. Jumper were jointly awarded half of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the development of AlphaFold, an AI program for protein structure prediction.

The Hutter Prize is a cash prize funded by Marcus Hutter which rewards data compression improvements on a specific 1 GB English text file, with the goal of encouraging research in artificial intelligence (AI).

This is a timeline of artificial intelligence, sometimes alternatively called synthetic intelligence.

The ethics of artificial intelligence covers a broad range of topics within the field that are considered to have particular ethical stakes. This includes algorithmic biases, fairness, automated decision-making, accountability, privacy, and regulation. It also covers various emerging or potential future challenges such as machine ethics, lethal autonomous weapon systems, arms race dynamics, AI safety and alignment, technological unemployment, AI-enabled misinformation, how to treat certain AI systems if they have a moral status, artificial superintelligence and existential risks.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in applications throughout industry and academia. In a manner analogous to electricity or computers, AI serves as a general-purpose technology that has numerous applications, including language translation, image recognition, decision-making, credit scoring and e-commerce. AI includes the development of machines which can perceive, understand, act and learn a scientific discipline.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turing test</span> Test of a machines ability to imitate human intelligence

The Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1949, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic).

The AI effect is the discounting of the behavior of an artificial-intelligence program as not "real" intelligence.

DeepMind Technologies Limited, also known by its trade name Google DeepMind, is a British-American artificial intelligence research laboratory which serves as a subsidiary of Google. Founded in the UK in 2010, it was acquired by Google in 2014 and merged with Google AI's Google Brain division to become Google DeepMind in April 2023. The company is based in London, with research centres in Canada, France, Germany, and the United States.

The Winograd schema challenge (WSC) is a test of machine intelligence proposed in 2012 by Hector Levesque, a computer scientist at the University of Toronto. Designed to be an improvement on the Turing test, it is a multiple-choice test that employs questions of a very specific structure: they are instances of what are called Winograd schemas, named after Terry Winograd, professor of computer science at Stanford University.

In the field of artificial intelligence (AI), AI alignment aims to steer AI systems toward a person's or group's intended goals, preferences, and ethical principles. An AI system is considered aligned if it advances the intended objectives. A misaligned AI system pursues unintended objectives.

Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3) is a large language model released by OpenAI in 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ChatGPT</span> Chatbot developed by OpenAI

ChatGPT is a generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot developed by OpenAI and launched in 2022. It is based on the GPT-4o large language model (LLM). ChatGPT can generate human-like conversational responses, and enables users to refine and steer a conversation towards a desired length, format, style, level of detail, and language. It is credited with accelerating the AI boom, which has led to ongoing rapid investment in and public attention to the field of artificial intelligence. Some observers have raised concern about the potential of ChatGPT and similar programs to displace human intelligence, enable plagiarism, or fuel misinformation.

Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) is a multimodal large language model created by OpenAI, and the fourth in its series of GPT foundation models. It was launched on March 14, 2023, and made publicly available via the paid chatbot product ChatGPT Plus, via OpenAI's API, and via the free chatbot Microsoft Copilot. As a transformer-based model, GPT-4 uses a paradigm where pre-training using both public data and "data licensed from third-party providers" is used to predict the next token. After this step, the model was then fine-tuned with reinforcement learning feedback from humans and AI for human alignment and policy compliance.

References

  1. ↑ AI set to exceed human brain power Archived 2008-02-19 at the Wayback Machine CNN.com (July 26, 2006)
  2. 1 2 Kaplan, Andreas; Haenlein, Michael (2019). "Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who's the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence". Business Horizons. 62: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004. S2CID   158433736.
  3. 1 2 Kurtzweil 2005 , p. 264
  4. ↑ National Research Council (1999), "Developments in Artificial Intelligence" , Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research, National Academy Press, ISBN   978-0-309-06278-7, OCLC   246584055 under "Artificial Intelligence in the 90s"
  5. ↑ Biever, Celeste (25 July 2023). "ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI". Nature . Retrieved 26 July 2023.
  6. ↑ Approximate year AI started beating top human experts
  7. 1 2 van den Herik, H.Jaap; Uiterwijk, Jos W.H.M.; van Rijswijck, Jack (January 2002). "Games solved: Now and in the future". Artificial Intelligence. 134 (1–2): 277–311. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00152-7 .
  8. ↑ Madrigal, Alexis C. (2017). "How Checkers Was Solved". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 6 May 2018. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  9. 1 2 "www.othello-club.de". berg.earthlingz.de. Archived from the original on 2018-07-15. Retrieved 2018-07-15.
  10. 1 2 Webley, Kayla (15 February 2011). "Top 10 Man-vs.-Machine Moments". Time. Archived from the original on 26 December 2017. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  11. 1 2 "Shogi prodigy breathes new life into the game | The Japan Times". The Japan Times. Archived from the original on 2018-07-15. Retrieved 2018-07-15.
  12. 1 2 Brown, Noam; Sandholm, Tuomas (2017). "Superhuman AI for heads-up no-limit poker: Libratus beats top professionals". Science. 359 (6374): 418–424. Bibcode:2018Sci...359..418B. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1733 . PMID   29249696.
  13. ↑ "Facebook Quietly Enters StarCraft War for AI Bots, and Loses". WIRED. 2017. Archived from the original on 7 May 2018. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  14. ↑ Sample, Ian (30 October 2019). "AI becomes grandmaster in 'fiendishly complex' StarCraft II". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 December 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  15. ↑ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Mitchell, Tom (22 December 2017). "What can machine learning do? Workforce implications". Science. 358 (6370): 1530–1534. Bibcode:2017Sci...358.1530B. doi:10.1126/science.aap8062. PMID   29269459. S2CID   4036151. Archived from the original on 29 September 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2018.
  16. ↑ "IKEA furniture and the limits of AI". The Economist. 2018. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
  17. ↑ Sample, Ian (18 October 2017). "'It's able to create knowledge itself': Google unveils AI that learns on its own". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 7 May 2018.
  18. ↑ "The AI revolution in science". Science | AAAS. 5 July 2017. Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2018.
  19. ↑ "Will your job still exist in 10 years when the robots arrive?". South China Morning Post . 2017. Archived from the original on 7 May 2018. Retrieved 7 May 2018.
  20. ↑ Mokyr, Joel (2019-11-01). "The Technology Trap: Capital Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation. By Carl Benedikt Frey. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019. Pp. 480. $29.95, hardcover". The Journal of Economic History. 79 (4): 1183–1189. doi:10.1017/s0022050719000639. ISSN   0022-0507. S2CID   211324400. Archived from the original on 2023-02-02. Retrieved 2020-11-25.
  21. ↑ Borowiec, Tracey Lien, Steven (2016). "AlphaGo beats human Go champ in milestone for artificial intelligence". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 13 May 2018. Retrieved 7 May 2018.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ↑ Brown, Noam; Sandholm, Tuomas (26 January 2018). "Superhuman AI for heads-up no-limit poker: Libratus beats top professionals". Science. 359 (6374): 418–424. Bibcode:2018Sci...359..418B. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1733 . PMID   29249696. S2CID   5003977.
  23. ↑ Ontanon, Santiago; Synnaeve, Gabriel; Uriarte, Alberto; Richoux, Florian; Churchill, David; Preuss, Mike (December 2013). "A Survey of Real-Time Strategy Game AI Research and Competition in StarCraft". IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games. 5 (4): 293–311. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.406.2524 . doi:10.1109/TCIAIG.2013.2286295. S2CID   5014732.
  24. ↑ "Facebook Quietly Enters StarCraft War for AI Bots, and Loses". WIRED. 2017. Archived from the original on 2 February 2023. Retrieved 7 May 2018.
  25. ↑ Schaeffer, J.; Burch, N.; Bjornsson, Y.; Kishimoto, A.; Muller, M.; Lake, R.; Lu, P.; Sutphen, S. (2007). "Checkers is solved". Science . 317 (5844): 1518–1522. Bibcode:2007Sci...317.1518S. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.95.5393 . doi:10.1126/science.1144079. PMID   17641166. S2CID   10274228.
  26. ↑ "God's Number is 20". Archived from the original on 2013-07-21. Retrieved 2011-08-07.
  27. ↑ Bowling, M.; Burch, N.; Johanson, M.; Tammelin, O. (2015). "Heads-up limit hold'em poker is solved". Science. 347 (6218): 145–9. Bibcode:2015Sci...347..145B. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.697.72 . doi:10.1126/science.1259433. PMID   25574016. S2CID   3796371.
  28. ↑ "In Major AI Breakthrough, Google System Secretly Beats Top Player at the Ancient Game of Go". WIRED. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  29. ↑ Sheppard, B. (2002). "World-championship-caliber Scrabble". Artificial Intelligence. 134 (1–2): 241–275. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00166-7 .
  30. ↑ Tesauro, Gerald (March 1995). "Temporal difference learning and TD-Gammon". Communications of the ACM. 38 (3): 58–68. doi: 10.1145/203330.203343 . S2CID   8763243. Archived from the original on 2013-01-11. Retrieved 2008-03-26.
  31. ↑ Tesauro, Gerald (January 2002). "Programming backgammon using self-teaching neural nets". Artificial Intelligence. 134 (1–2): 181–199. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00110-2. ...at least two other neural net programs also appear to be capable of superhuman play
  32. ↑ "Kramnik vs Deep Fritz: Computer wins match by 4:2". Chess News. 2006-12-05. Archived from the original on 2018-11-25. Retrieved 2018-07-15.
  33. ↑ "The Week in Chess 771". theweekinchess.com. Archived from the original on 2018-11-15. Retrieved 2018-07-15.
  34. ↑ Nickel, Arno (May 2017). "Zor Winner in an Exciting Photo Finish". www.infinitychess.com. Innovative Solutions. Archived from the original on 2018-08-17. Retrieved 2018-07-17. ... on third place the best centaur ...
  35. ↑ Markoff, John (2011-02-16). "Computer Wins on 'Jeopardy!': Trivial, It's Not". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-02-22.
  36. ↑ Jackson, Joab. "IBM Watson Vanquishes Human Jeopardy Foes". PC World. IDG News. Archived from the original on 2011-02-20. Retrieved 2011-02-17.
  37. ↑ "The Arimaa Challenge". arimaa.com. Archived from the original on 2010-03-22. Retrieved 2018-07-15.
  38. ↑ Roeder, Oliver (10 July 2017). "The Bots Beat Us. Now What?". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on 28 December 2017. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  39. ↑ "AlphaGo beats Ke Jie again to wrap up three-part match". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2018-07-15. Retrieved 2018-07-15.
  40. ↑ Blair, Alan; Saffidine, Abdallah (30 August 2019). "AI surpasses humans at six-player poker". Science. 365 (6456): 864–865. Bibcode:2019Sci...365..864B. doi:10.1126/science.aay7774. PMID   31467208. S2CID   201672421. Archived from the original on 18 July 2022. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  41. ↑ "Sony's new AI driver achieves 'reliably superhuman' race times in Gran Turismo". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2022-07-20. Retrieved 2022-07-19.
  42. ↑ Proverb: The probabilistic cruciverbalist. By Greg A. Keim, Noam Shazeer, Michael L. Littman, Sushant Agarwal, Catherine M. Cheves, Joseph Fitzgerald, Jason Grosland, Fan Jiang, Shannon Pollard, and Karl Weinmeister. 1999. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 710-717. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.
  43. ↑ Wernick, Adam (24 Sep 2014). "'Dr. Fill' vies for crossword solving supremacy, but still comes up short". Public Radio International. Archived from the original on 2017-12-28. Retrieved Dec 27, 2017. The first year, Dr. Fill came in 141st out of about 600 competitors. It did a little better the second-year; last year it was 65th
  44. ↑ "Arago's AI can now beat some human players at complex civ strategy games". TechCrunch. 6 December 2016. Archived from the original on 5 June 2022. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
  45. ↑ "AI bots trained for 180 years a day to beat humans at Dota 2". The Verge. 25 June 2018. Archived from the original on 25 June 2018. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
  46. ↑ Bethe, P. M. (2009). The state of automated bridge play.
  47. ↑ "AlphaStar: Mastering the Real-Time Strategy Game StarCraft II". 24 January 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-07-22. Retrieved 2022-07-19.
  48. ↑ "Suphx: The World Best Mahjong AI". Microsoft . Archived from the original on 2022-07-19. Retrieved 2022-07-19.
  49. ↑ "Deepmind AI Researchers Introduce 'DeepNash', An Autonomous Agent Trained With Model-Free Multiagent Reinforcement Learning That Learns To Play The Game Of Stratego At Expert Level". MarkTechPost. 9 July 2022. Archived from the original on 9 July 2022. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
  50. ↑ Bakhtin, Anton; Wu, David; Lerer, Adam; Gray, Jonathan; Jacob, Athul; Farina, Gabriele; Miller, Alexander; Brown, Noam (11 October 2022). "Mastering the Game of No-Press Diplomacy via Human-Regularized Reinforcement Learning and Planning". arXiv: 2210.05492 [cs.GT].
  51. ↑ Hu, Hengyuan; Wu, David; Lerer, Adam; Foerster, Jakob; Brown, Noam (11 October 2022). "Human-AI Coordination via Human-Regularized Search and Learning". arXiv: 2210.05125 [cs.AI].
  52. ↑ "Microsoft researchers say their newest deep learning system beats humans -- and Google - VentureBeat - Big Data - by Jordan Novet". VentureBeat. 2015-02-10. Archived from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
  53. ↑ Santoro, Adam; Bartunov, Sergey; Botvinick, Matthew; Wierstra, Daan; Lillicrap, Timothy (19 May 2016). "One-shot Learning with Memory-Augmented Neural Networks". p. 5, Table 1. arXiv: 1605.06065 [cs.LG]. 4.2. Omniglot Classification: "The network exhibited high classification accuracy on just the second presentation of a sample from a class within an episode (82.8%), reaching up to 94.9% accuracy by the fifth instance and 98.1% accuracy by the tenth.
  54. ↑ "Man Versus Machine: Who Wins When It Comes to Facial Recognition?". Neuroscience News. 2018-12-03. Archived from the original on 2022-07-20. Retrieved 2022-07-20.
  55. ↑ Yan, Ming; Xu, Haiyang; Li, Chenliang; Tian, Junfeng; Bi, Bin; Wang, Wei; Chen, Weihua; Xu, Xianzhe; Wang, Fan; Cao, Zheng; Zhang, Zhicheng; Zhang, Qiyu; Zhang, Ji; Huang, Songfang; Huang, Fei; Si, Luo; Jin, Rong (17 November 2021). "Achieving Human Parity on Visual Question Answering". arXiv: 2111.08896 [cs.CL].
  56. 1 2 3 Zhang, D., Mishra, S., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ganguli, D., Grosz, B., ... & Perrault, R. (2021). The AI index 2021 annual report. AI Index (Stanford University). arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06312.
  57. ↑ Metz, Cade (4 September 2019). "A Breakthrough for A.I. Technology: Passing an 8th-Grade Science Test". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 5 January 2023. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  58. 1 2 3 van der Maas, Han L.J.; Snoek, Lukas; Stevenson, Claire E. (July 2021). "How much intelligence is there in artificial intelligence? A 2020 update". Intelligence. 87: 101548. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101548 . S2CID   236236331.
  59. ↑ McMillan, Robert (2015). "Google's AI Is Now Smart Enough to Play Atari Like the Pros". Wired. Archived from the original on 5 January 2023. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  60. ↑ "Robots with legs are getting ready to walk among us". The Verge. Archived from the original on 28 December 2017. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  61. ↑ Hurst, Nathan. "Why Funny, Falling, Soccer-Playing Robots Matter". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on 28 December 2017. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  62. ↑ "The Business of Artificial Intelligence". Harvard Business Review. 18 July 2017. Archived from the original on 29 December 2017. Retrieved 28 December 2017.
  63. ↑ Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.
  64. ↑ Nie, W., Yu, Z., Mao, L., Patel, A. B., Zhu, Y., & Anandkumar, A. (2020). Bongard-logo: A new benchmark for human-level concept learning and reasoning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 16468-16480.
  65. ↑ Stephenson, Matthew; Renz, Jochen; Ge, Xiaoyu (March 2020). "The computational complexity of Angry Birds". Artificial Intelligence. 280: 103232. arXiv: 1812.07793 . doi:10.1016/j.artint.2019.103232. S2CID   56475869. Despite many different attempts over the past five years the problem is still largely unsolved, with AI approaches far from human-level performance.
  66. ↑ Turing, Alan (October 1950). "Computing Machinery and Intelligence". Mind . 59 (236): 433–460. doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433. ISSN   1460-2113. JSTOR   2251299. S2CID   14636783.
  67. ↑ Schoenick, Carissa; Clark, Peter; Tafjord, Oyvind; Turney, Peter; Etzioni, Oren (23 August 2017). "Moving beyond the Turing Test with the Allen AI Science Challenge". Communications of the ACM. 60 (9): 60–64. arXiv: 1604.04315 . doi:10.1145/3122814. S2CID   6383047.
  68. ↑ Feigenbaum, Edward A. (2003). "Some challenges and grand challenges for computational intelligence". Journal of the ACM. 50 (1): 32–40. doi:10.1145/602382.602400. S2CID   15379263.
  69. ↑ Gray, Jim (2003). "What Next? A Dozen Information-Technology Research Goals". Journal of the ACM. 50 (1): 41–57. arXiv: cs/9911005 . Bibcode:1999cs.......11005G. doi:10.1145/602382.602401. S2CID   10336312.
  70. ↑ Hernandez-Orallo, Jose (2000). "Beyond the Turing Test". Journal of Logic, Language and Information. 9 (4): 447–466. doi:10.1023/A:1008367325700. S2CID   14481982.
  71. ↑ Kuang-Cheng, Andy Wang (2023). "International licensing under an endogenous tariff in vertically-related markets". Journal of Economics. Retrieved 2023-04-23.
  72. ↑ Dowe, D. L.; Hajek, A. R. (1997). "A computational extension to the Turing Test". Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the Australasian Cognitive Science Society. Archived from the original on 28 June 2011.
  73. ↑ Hernandez-Orallo, J.; Dowe, D. L. (2010). "Measuring Universal Intelligence: Towards an Anytime Intelligence Test". Artificial Intelligence. 174 (18): 1508–1539. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.295.9079 . doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.006.
  74. ↑ Hernández-Orallo, José; Dowe, David L.; Hernández-Lloreda, M.Victoria (March 2014). "Universal psychometrics: Measuring cognitive abilities in the machine kingdom". Cognitive Systems Research. 27: 50–74. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.06.001. hdl: 10251/50244 . S2CID   26440282.
  75. 1 2 Varanasi, Lakshmi (March 2023). "AI models like ChatGPT and GPT-4 are acing everything from the bar exam to AP Biology. Here's a list of difficult exams both AI versions have passed". Business Insider. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  76. ↑ Rudy, Melissa (24 May 2023). "Latest version of ChatGPT passes radiology board-style exam, highlights AI's 'growing potential,' study finds". Fox News. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  77. ↑ Bhayana, Rajesh; Bleakney, Robert R.; Krishna, Satheesh (1 June 2023). "GPT-4 in Radiology: Improvements in Advanced Reasoning". Radiology. 307 (5): e230987. doi:10.1148/radiol.230987. PMID   37191491. S2CID   258716171.
  78. ↑ "ILSVRC2017". image-net.org. Archived from the original on 2018-11-02. Retrieved 2018-11-06.
  79. 1 2 Gray, Richard (2018). "How long will it take for your job to be automated?". BBC. Archived from the original on 11 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  80. 1 2 "AI will be able to beat us at everything by 2060, say experts". New Scientist. 2018. Archived from the original on 31 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  81. 1 2 Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Evans, O. (2017). When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.08807.
  82. ↑ McClain, Dylan Loeb (11 September 2010). "Bent Larsen, Chess Grandmaster, Dies at 75". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 March 2014. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  83. ↑ "The Business of Artificial Intelligence". Harvard Business Review. 18 July 2017. Archived from the original on 18 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  84. ↑ "4 Crazy Predictions About the Future of Art". Inc.com. 2017. Archived from the original on 12 September 2017. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  85. ↑ Koch, Christof (2016). "How the Computer Beat the Go Master". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  86. ↑ "'I'm in shock!' How an AI beat the world's best human at Go". New Scientist. 2016. Archived from the original on 13 May 2016. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  87. ↑ Moyer, Christopher (2016). "How Google's AlphaGo Beat a Go World Champion". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 31 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  88. ↑ Johnson, George (29 July 1997). "To Test a Powerful Computer, Play an Ancient Game". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 31 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  89. ↑ Johnson, George (4 April 2016). "To Beat Go Champion, Google's Program Needed a Human Army". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 31 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  90. ↑ "Cracking GO". IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. 2007. Archived from the original on 31 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  91. 1 2 "The Mystery of Go, the Ancient Game That Computers Still Can't Win". WIRED. 2014. Archived from the original on 31 January 2016. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  92. ↑ Gibney, Elizabeth (28 January 2016). "Google AI algorithm masters ancient game of Go". Nature. 529 (7587): 445–446. Bibcode:2016Natur.529..445G. doi: 10.1038/529445a . PMID   26819021. S2CID   4460235.
  93. 1 2 Bostrom, Nick (2013). Superintelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0199678112.
  94. ↑ Khatchadourian, Raffi (16 November 2015). "The Doomsday Invention". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 29 April 2019. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  95. ↑ Müller, V. C., & Bostrom, N. (2016). Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. In Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence (pp. 555-572). Springer, Cham.
  96. ↑ Muehlhauser, L., & Salamon, A. (2012). Intelligence explosion: Evidence and import. In Singularity Hypotheses (pp. 15-42). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  97. ↑ Tierney, John (25 August 2008). "Vernor Vinge's View of the Future - Is Technology That Outthinks Us a Partner or a Master ?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 24 December 2017. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  98. ↑ "Superhumanism". WIRED. 1995. Archived from the original on 2 September 2017. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  99. ↑ "Tech Luminaries Address Singularity". IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. 2008. Archived from the original on 30 April 2019. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
  100. ↑ Molloy, Mark (17 March 2017). "Expert predicts date when 'sexier and funnier' humans will merge with AI machines". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 31 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.

Notes

  1. ↑ IEEE Spectrum attributes to Moore both "Never" and "I don't believe this kind of thing is likely to happen, at least for a long time"
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.