Simargl (also Sěmargl, Semargl) or Sěm and Rgel is an East Slavic god or gods often depicted as a winged dog, [1] mentioned in two sources. The origin and etymology of this/these figure(s) is the subject of considerable debate. The dominant view is to interpret Simargl as a single deity who was borrowed from the Iranian Simurgh. However, this view is criticized, and some researchers propose that the existence of two deities, Sěm and Rgel, should be recognized.
The first source that mentions Simargl is Primary Chronicle , which describes how Vladimir the Great erected statues to Slavic gods in 980:
And Vladimir began to reign alone in Kyiv. And he placed idols on the hill outside the palace: a Perun in wood with a silver head and a gold moustache, and Khors and Dazhbog and Stribog and Simargl and Mokosh. And they offered sacrifices and called them gods, and they took their sons and daughters to them and sacrificed them to the devils. And they profaned the earth with their sacrifices, and Rus’ and that hill were profaned by blood. But God the merciful, who does not wish the death of sinners, on that hill stands today the church of Saint Vasilij, as we will relate later. [2]
— Primary Chronicle
In a later text from the second half of the 12th century, Sermon by One Who Loves Christ, Simargl is mentioned as two separate deities, Sěm and Rgel:
The Sermon further states: „Therefore, Christians must not hold demonic festivities, meaning dancing, music and profane songs, and offerings to the idols, who with fire under the fields of sheaves pray to the Vily, to Mokosh, and Sim and Rgl, to Perun, Rod, the Rozhanitsy and all the like.” [4]
In copies of Primary Chronicle, the theonym is written (in the genitive) as Simarĭgla (Laurentian Codex), Sěmarĭgla (Hypatian Codex) and Semarĭgla (Radziwiłł Chronicle). [5] In the Sermon as two separate theonyms: Sima, Rĭgla (genitive) and Sim(o)u, Rĭgl(o)u (dative). [6]
In 1841, Potr Preys proposed that Sim and Rgel be considered characters corresponding, respectively, to the Old Testament Asima and Nergal. [7] This view was supported by Viljo Mansikka. [8] Alexander Famitsin, on the other hand, concluded that Simargl was a corrupted notation that was originally intended to read Sim Yaryl . [9] Vyacheslav Ivanov and Vladimir Toporov originally concluded that the theonym originally sounded *Sedmor(o)-golvъ and meant "seven-headed". [10]
Since 1933, Simargl has been considered an Iranian loanword. It was first proposed [11] by Kamilla Trever, a Russian historian and orientalist, according to whom the source word for Simargl was supposed to be Simurgh – a winged creature with a dog's head that was a protector of plants. [12] The derivation of Simargl from Simurgh is now the dominant view in scholarship. [13] [6] The source of the borrowing was to be Persian Simurg, Middle Persian Sēnmurw, Avestan saēna-marga or Scythian-Sarmatian Sēnmary. [6]
Boris Rybakov was an ardent supporter of the Trever theory; he rejected the division of Simargl into two deities or the possibility of typos. [15] Based on the relationship between Simargl and Simgur, he concluded that Simargl was the god of seeds, sprouts and roots of plants, the protector of shoots and greens, the intermediary between the highest gods of heaven and earth. [16] Simargl was supposed to be a deity of a lower order. He was depicted as a winged dog with fangs and claws, [15] and his images were to be found on various objects, such as bracelets. [17] According to Rybakov, Simargl was identical to Pereplut (often referring to them as Simargl-Pereplut [18] ) and was later replaced by him. [19] The view is supported by a number of scholars including Alexander Gieysztor [20] eventually also Ivanov and Toporov and many others. [13]
Mikhail Vasilyev admits that there are some linguistic difficulties in deriving Simargl from Simurgh, but states that it is plausible and accepts the theory, at least until a better one is discovered. However, he questioned Rybakov's interpretation seeing Simargl as a plant god: there are no Iranian or Indian sources confirming that Simurgh was the protector of plants, so Simargl could not have inherited this competence. However, he points out that the common Indo-Iranian characteristic of Simurgh was to mediate between worlds, and that at a later stage, in Eastern Iranian mythology, he was the protector of humans, especially human clusters, and that this may have determined his introduction into the Vladimir's pantheon. He also points out that Simurgh in the form of a dog-bird originated in (post)Sasanian Iran and from there spread to the space between the Atlantic and Siberia. However, after the Islamization of Iran, Simurgh lost its religious significance and became an ornamental motif. According to him, there is no evidence that among the eastern Iranians, from whom the Slavs were supposed to have taken him over, Simurgh was depicted with a dog's head, and this means that he must have had an original appearance, i.e. be depicted as a large, predatory bird, and consequently, Simargl could not have been a dog-bird. As a result, he also accuses Rybakov of arbitrarily concluding that winged dogs in East Slavic art are depictions of Simargl, while an analysis of the oldest depictions of this type (from the 10th century onward) suggests that they may be Old Russian reflections of Western European dragons of the romanesqe type. [13]
The relationship between Simargl and Simurgh has also been criticized on linguistic grounds: the vowels [6] and the last consonant ([l]) do not fit. [6] [21] This has led to at least a dozen other proposals. [6] Martin Pukanec proposed to read the second part of the theonym as Proto-Slavic *orьlъ "eagle". Here he mentions the Latvian cognate ērglis, containing -g-. According to him, this is to prove that -g- was originally in the Balto-Slavic words for eagle, but fell out due to taboo. The Slavs were thus supposed to have borrowed Simurgh as *Sim-orьglъ "eagle Sim" and evolved into *Simo-orьglъ > *Simōrьglъ > *Simarьglъ. [22] This etymology, however, cannot be accepted because Latvian ērglis is a late form and derives from the earlier *ereľis < *erlis and does not correspond to the original forms. [6]
Due to the above mentioned problems, some scholars concluded that Simargl were two separate deities: Sim/Sem/Sěm and Rgel/Rgěl, and it was for them that etymology was sought. Alexander Brückner stated that in the Primary Chronicle the conjunction is also not found between Khors and Dazhbog , and these are still separate theonyms, therefore Simargl should also be divided into two words. [23] According to Martin Pitro and Petr Vokáč, if one considers the existence of two deities instead of one, it is possible that Sěm and Rgel were divine twins, the Slavic counterparts of the Dioskuri. [24]
According to Brückner, Sim's etymology was not problematic. He stated that since there were such words as šeima, šaima, keimas, kaimas in Lithuanian, there could have been a feminine word sima or a masculine sim in Slavic alongside sěmia "family". In doing so, he uncertainly pointed to such place names as Simoradz and Siemiradz . [25]
Krzysztof T. Witczak and Idaliana Kaczor assumed that the basic Old Russian form of the theonym was Sěmъ and that it was etymologically related to Lithuanian Seme-pates, Roman Sēmūnes "deities of sowing", Sabine Simo Sancus Dius Fidius "some deity compared to Hercules", Old Irish Semon "hero or demigod" and Gaulish Σημόνη. ήρωίς "heroine". All these names are supposed to derive ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *Sēmos / *Sēmōn "god of sowing" or *Sēmonā "goddess of sowing". [26] Witczak and Kaczor refer to the PIE root *seh₁- "to sow" > Proto-Slavic *sěti. Michał Łuczyński, however, points out the errors of this etymology: the Latin notation Semepates should be read as the Lithuanian *Žemepatys (from žemė "earth"), while for the rest of the names it is possible to reconstruct the protoform, but it would be *seVmōn-, from the PIE dial. (Italo-Celtic) *seĝʰ-mōn-, from PIE *seĝʰ- "to maintain, care for" and they are not related to Sěm. [27]
Łuczyński, however, agrees with Witczak and Kaczor that the theonym Sěm is etymologically related to the Slavic word for sowing. He reconstructs the Proto-Slavic noun *sêmъ, which consists of the verb *sěti "to sow" and the suffix *-mъ, which literally meant "sowing", secondarily "that what one sows", "that which is sown", etc., from which the theonym is derived. [27]
Brücker proposed two etymologies for Rgel. First one connects Rgel with the alleged Lithuanian god Ruglis or Rugulis; he connected them to, respectively, Old Polish reż and Lithuanian rugys "rye" (Old Polish from PS *rъžь [28] ), thus Rgel would be a god of rye, field, economy. The other links Rgel to the Lithuanian god Ruguczis "god of sour things". The Lithuanian theonym is supposed to derive from rugti "to sour", this root in the form rug- also occurs in Slavic languages. Rgel would thus a god associated with the souring. The name of the Polish village of Rgielsko is supposed to derive from the god's name. [29]
Witczak and Kaczor reconstructed the PIE theonym *Rudlós "God of the wild nature" to be attested by the Vedic Rudra and the Old Russian Rgel (from the earlier *Rъdlъ). [30]
Łuczyński notes, however, that none of these etymologies can be accepted because their authors use erroneous notation of the deity when creating the etymology: Brücker gives notations of Rъglъ and Rъgъlъ, [29] and Witczak and Kaczor give Rъglъ [30] (all with ъ – a hard sign), while in the sources it is written as Rьglъ (with ь – a soft sign). [31] Consequently, he also rejects deriving Rgielsko from the name of a god, since then the expected form would be *Rzgielsko (in Polish, the theonym would be *Rzgieł (Slavic rъ > Polish rz)). [32]
According to Łuczyński, the ь in the name may be the result of apophony of e : ь and the only word that fits the theonym is the Proto-Slavic verb *regti "to cut" (cf. Slovene régati "to crack", Polish dial.rzega "streak, weal, welt"), [31] which he derives from the PIE root *h₁regʷ- "to be dark" (cf. Greek érevos "darkness"). [33] The semantic shift from "dark, black" > "empty" is typical (cf. Sanskrit rájas "dark; empty" from the same stem), then the meaning may have shifted to "to make something empty", "to make empty places" > "to make holes, cuts; to cut". [33] The theonym would thus consist of *rьgǫ / *regǫ "I cut" (1st person singular present tense of *regti) and the suffix *-lъ. [34] The resulting participial noun *rьglъ, which later became a theonym, may have meant "that which is cut out" > "cut" > perhaps "chink, fissure", or "hole", "cavity". [32] If this etymology is correct, the name of the Czech municipality Řehlovice may derive from god (from the personal name *Řehl-). [32] According to Łuczyński, Sěm and Rgel were agricultural gods (from the names of agricultural work). [35]
Chernobog and Belobog are an alleged pair of Polabian deities. Chernobog appears in Helmold's Chronicle as a god of misfortune worshipped by the Wagri and Obodrites, while Belobog is not mentioned – he was reconstructed in opposition to Chernobog. Both gods also appear in later sources, but they are not considered reliable. Researchers do not agree on the status of Chernobog and Belobog: many scholars recognize the authenticity of these theonyms and explain them, for example, as gods of good and evil; on the other hand, many scholars believe that they are pseudo-deities, and Chernobog may have originally meant "bad fate", and later associated with the Christian devil.
Lada and Lado are alleged Slavic deities. Lada was first mentioned around 1405–1412 in the sermons of Lucas of Wielki Koźmin, which warned against worshipping Lada and other gods during spring ceremonies and folk performances.
Stribog is a god in Slavic mythology found in three East Slavic sources, whose cult may also have existed in Poland. The sources do not inform about the functions of the god, but nowadays he is most often interpreted as a wind deity who distributes wealth.
Svarog is a Slavic god who may be associated with fire and blacksmithing and who was once interpreted as a sky god on the basis of an etymology rejected by modern scholarship. He is mentioned in only one source, the Primary Chronicle, which is problematic in interpretation. He is presented there as the Slavic equivalent of the Greek god Hephaestus. The meaning of his name is associated with fire. He is the father of Dazhbog and Svarozhits.
Mokosh is a Slavic goddess. No narratives survive to the present day about this deity and so scholars must rely on academic disciplines like philology to discern details about her.
Svetovit, also known as Sventovit and Svantovit amongst other variants, is the god of abundance and war, and the chief god of the Slavic tribe of the Rani, and later of all the Polabian Slavs. His organized cult was located on the island of Rügen, at Cape Arkona, where his main temple was also located. According to the descriptions of medieval chroniclers, the statue representing this god had four heads, a horn and a sword, and to the deity himself were dedicated a white horse, a saddle, a bit, a flag, and eagles. Once a year, after the harvest, a large festival was held in his honor. With the help of a horn and a horse belonging to the god, the priests carried out divinations, and at night the god himself rode a horse to fight his enemies. His name can be translated as "Strong Lord" or "Holy Lord". In the past it was often mistakenly believed that the cult of Svetovit originated from St. Vitus. Among scholars of Slavic mythology, Svetovit is often regarded as a Polabian hypostasis of Pan-Slavic god Perun. His cult was destroyed in 1168.
In the pre-Christian religion of Eastern and Southern Slavs, Rod is the god of the family, ancestors and fate. Among Southern Slavs, he is also known as Sud. He is usually mentioned together with Rozhanitsy deities. One's first haircut (postriziny) was dedicated to him, in a celebration in which he and the rozhanitsy were given a meal and the cut hair. His cult lost its importance through time, and in the ninth or tenth century he was replaced by Perun, Svarog and/or Svetevid, which explains his absence in the pantheon of Vladimir the Great.
Živa, Zhiva is a mother goddess of one of the tribes belonging to the Obodritic confederation of the Polabian Slavs. The goddess so appears only in the Chronicle of Helmold of Bozov. He described the strengthening of the pagan cult during the reign of Niklot:
Khors is a Slavic god of uncertain functions mentioned since the 12th century. Generally interpreted as a sun god, sometimes as a moon god. The meaning of the theonym is also unknown: most often his name has been combined with the Iranian word for sun, such as the Persian xoršid, or the Ossetian xor, but modern linguists strongly criticize such an etymology, and other native etymologies are proposed instead.
Radegast or Radogost is, according to medieval chroniclers, the god of the Polabian Slavs, whose temple was located in Rethra. In modern academic literature, however, the dominant view is that Radegast is a local nickname or a local alternative name of the solar god Svarozhits, who, according to earlier sources, was the chief god of Rethra. Some researchers also believe that the name of the town, where Svarozhits was the main deity, was mistakenly taken for a theonym. A popular local legend in the Czech Republic is related to Radegast.
Podaga is a Polabian deity who had his statue in a temple in Plön. Mentioned only in Helmold's Chronicle, which does not give a depiction or function of the deity.
Among the Slavs there are many modes of idolatry and not all of them coincide with the same kind of superstition. Some create in their temples statues of fantastic forms, such as the idol of Plön, who is called Podaga, others live in forests and groves, as is the case of the god Prone of Oldenburg, of whom no image exists.
Yarovit, Iarovit is a Polabian god of war, worshipped in Vologošč (Circipanians) and Hobolin. Sources give only a brief description of his cult, his main temple was located in Vologošč, where there was a golden shield belonging to Yarovit. By one Christian monk he was identified with the Roman Mars.
Jesza or Jasza is an alleged Polish god. He was first mentioned around 1405–1412 in the sermons of Lucas of Wielki Koźmin, which warned against the worship of Jesza and other gods during spring rituals and folk performances. His popularity is partly owed Jan Długosz's comparison of him to the Roman god Jupiter. However, the opinions of the 20th century and later researchers are divided with respect to the authenticity of the deity.
Interpretatio slavica is the practice by the Slavic peoples to identify the gods of neighboring peoples and the names of Christian saints with the names of Slavic deities.
Svarozhits, Svarozhich is a Slavic god of fire, son of Svarog. One of the few Pan-Slavic gods. He is most likely identical with Radegast, less often identified with Dazhbog.
Dzidzilela, Dzidzileyla, Dzidzilelya is an alleged Polish goddess. First mentioned by Jan Długosz as the Polish equivalent of the Roman goddess Venus, goddess of marriage. Nowadays, the authenticity of the goddess is rejected by most researchers, and it is believed that the theonym was created by recognizing a fragment of folk songs as a proper name.
Hennil or Bendil is an alleged agrarian Slavic god worshipped by the Polabian Slavs. He was mentioned by Bishop Thietmar in his Chronicle as a god who was represented by a staff crowned by a hand holding a ring, which is interpreted as a symbol of fertility. However, there is no general consensus on the authenticity of the deity.
Svarog is a Slavic god of fire and smithing mentioned in the Slavic translation of the Chronicle of John Malalas found in the Primary Chronicle as the Slavic equivalent of the Greek god Hephaestus.
Pizamar is a Slavic deity worshipped on Rügen. His statue was overthrown by the Danes in 1168 together with statues of other gods on Rügen. He is mentioned only in Knýtlinga saga, which, however, does not give the functions of the god or his image. Nowadays his name may be transcribed into English as Pachomir, Pachemir.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)