Animal Rights Law

Last updated

Animal Rights Law
Animal Rights Law.png
First edition cover
AuthorsRaffael N. Fasel and Sean C. Butler
LanguageEnglish
Subject Animal rights law
GenreLaw, philosophy
Publisher Hart Publishing
Publication date
23 February 2023
Publication placeUnited Kingdom
Media typeHardcover, paperback, ebook
Pages240
ISBN 978-1-5099-5646-3
OCLC 1334883136

Animal Rights Law is a 2023 textbook by Raffael N. Fasel and Sean C. Butler. It is a comprehensive examination of the legal framework surrounding animal rights. The book provides an overview of how different legal systems have addressed the issue, from early anti-cruelty laws to more recent efforts aimed at granting animals fundamental rights and legal personhood. Drawing on examples from over 30 legal systems, the book explores both civil and common law traditions, incorporating legal theory, ethics, and social considerations to give a broad perspective on the subject. It is based on the authors' course at the University of Cambridge and serves as both an introduction and a scholarly exploration of the emerging field of animal rights law.

Contents

Summary

The book begins by analyzing the current legal status of animals in different jurisdictions. In many legal systems, animals are classified as property, allowing them to be owned, bought, sold, and used similarly to inanimate objects. Some countries, however, have introduced distinctions to recognize animals as sentient beings, differentiating them from mere property. The authors explore various forms of animal protection laws, including anti-cruelty statutes that prohibit mistreatment and broader welfare laws that require the provision of adequate care. While some countries have incorporated constitutional protections for animals, enforcement remains inconsistent, and the effectiveness of these laws varies widely.

A central theme of the book is the debate between animal welfare and animal rights. Welfarists argue that humans can continue to own and use animals as long as they are treated humanely, while abolitionists contend that all forms of animal exploitation should be eliminated. A third position, known as new welfarism, seeks to balance both perspectives by advocating for gradual improvements in animal welfare while moving towards greater legal recognition of animal rights. The book also discusses the historical development of animal protection laws, highlighting how evolving scientific and ethical understandings have influenced legal reforms.

The philosophical foundations of animal rights play a crucial role in legal debates on the subject. The book examines influential philosophical perspectives, including Peter Singer's utilitarianism, which evaluates animal treatment based on overall welfare; Tom Regan's deontological approach, which argues that animals have inherent moral rights; Martha Nussbaum's capabilities theory, which emphasizes the need to support animals' ability to flourish; and Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka's political animal rights theory, which suggests that animals should be granted certain legal and political protections. The book also presents critiques of animal rights, including ecofeminist perspectives, conservationist arguments, and contractualist theories that challenge the idea of extending rights to non-human entities.

A key legal question explored in the book is whether animals can have legal rights. The authors examine two primary theories: the choice (or will-based) theory, which links rights to autonomy and decision-making, and the interest-based theory, which argues that rights should be granted to beings with significant interests, such as animals. The discussion also covers whether animals should be classified as legal persons and whether their status as property presents an obstacle to meaningful legal protections. This leads to an analysis of the relationship between animal rights and human rights, with some scholars arguing that the two movements are compatible and mutually reinforcing, while others contend that recognizing animal rights could undermine human rights.

The book also examines the role of litigation in advancing animal rights. Several landmark cases have sought to establish legal personhood for animals, particularly through the use of habeas corpus petitions. Notable examples include the case of Sandra, an orangutan in Argentina, and Happy, an elephant in the Bronx Zoo, both of which involved legal arguments over whether animals should be granted rights similar to those of humans. The authors analyze the outcomes of these cases and their broader implications for the future of animal rights law.

Legislative efforts to establish legal rights for animals are also explored. While no country currently has binding animal rights legislation, various proposals have been introduced at both national and international levels. The book discusses key considerations in drafting such laws, including defining the scope of rights, establishing mechanisms for enforcement, and ensuring procedural protections for animals. The authors highlight the challenges of translating philosophical and ethical arguments into legal frameworks, as well as the political and economic factors that influence legislative progress.

The final section of the book examines whether animal rights should be considered a social justice issue, drawing comparisons with other movements such as abolitionism and feminism. While some argue that the struggle for animal rights parallels historical human rights movements, others caution against drawing direct analogies. The book explores the lessons that animal rights advocates can learn from these movements, including the importance of public engagement, strategic activism, and legal reform. The authors also address controversial comparisons that have been made between animal rights and issues such as slavery and gender oppression, discussing both the potential benefits and the ethical concerns associated with such comparisons.

Reception

Angus Nurse, in the Environmental Law Review, reviewed Animal Rights Law favorably, acknowledging the book's contribution to the field while offering some constructive suggestions for improvement. He commends Fasel and Butler for providing a balanced and accessible treatment of complex issues surrounding animal rights, praising their ability to navigate debates about legal personhood, anti-cruelty laws, and welfare frameworks. Nurse appreciates the book's international scope, noting its inclusion of diverse case law from various countries and international courts, which he views as an important strength. He finds the discussion of "thick" and "thin" rights particularly compelling, recognizing it as a useful way to highlight differing perspectives on animal rights. However, Nurse also suggests that the book could benefit from a deeper exploration of certain topics, particularly in terms of human rights comparisons. Despite this, he concludes that the book strikes a successful balance between scholarly rigor and accessibility, making it a valuable resource for both students and scholars. [1]

Katy Sowery, in her review for The Modern Law Review , expresses a generally positive view of the book, praising its comprehensive overview of key issues in animal rights law. She appreciates that the book provides a helpful introduction to the complex theoretical and legal questions surrounding animal rights, highlighting the authors' clear analysis of key debates. Sowery acknowledges that the book effectively navigates philosophical arguments while providing accessible discussions for readers. However, she also notes that it does not delve deeply into the substance behind some of these issues, offering only brief references to alternative perspectives and more in-depth resources. Overall, Sowery finds the book valuable as an introductory resource, but she suggests it could benefit from a more critical engagement with the limitations of legal frameworks and further exploration of broader social justice connections. [2]

Bianka M.A. Atlas' review highlights the book as a comprehensive and accessible resource on the evolving field of animal rights. She commends the authors for their clear language and interdisciplinary approach, making the text suitable for a diverse audience, including legal scholars, policymakers, and general readers. Atlas appreciates the book's global perspective, practical exercises, and its thorough engagement with legal theory, especially regarding the legal status of animals and their rights. She notes that the work provides valuable insights, though it may not delve deeply into all areas, and encourages readers to explore supplementary materials for a fuller understanding of animal rights law. [3]

Andrew Rowan's review for WellBeing International describes the book as a comprehensive text, highlighting its accessible and thorough exploration of animal rights law. The review notes the book's inclusion of online resources and acknowledges its contribution to the field. Additionally, the book is recognized for its ability to engage students in the evolving discussion surrounding animal law. [4]

Publication history

Animal Rights Law was published on 23 February 2023 in hardcover, paperback, and ebook formats, by Hart Publishing, an imprint of Bloombury Publishing. [5]

Related Research Articles

Speciesism is a term used in philosophy regarding the treatment of individuals of different species. The term has several different definitions. Some specifically define speciesism as discrimination or unjustified treatment based on an individual's species membership, while others define it as differential treatment without regard to whether the treatment is justified or not. Richard D. Ryder, who coined the term, defined it as "a prejudice or attitude of bias in favour of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species". Speciesism results in the belief that humans have the right to use non-human animals in exploitative ways which is pervasive in the modern society. Studies from 2015 and 2019 suggest that people who support animal exploitation also tend to have intersectional bias that encapsulates and endorses racist, sexist, and other prejudicial views, which furthers the beliefs in human supremacy and group dominance to justify systems of inequality and oppression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great ape personhood</span> Extending personhood to nonhuman great apes

Great ape personhood is a movement to extend personhood and some legal protections to the non-human members of the great ape family: bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans.

A person is a being who has certain capacities or attributes such as reason, morality, consciousness or self-consciousness, and being a part of a culturally established form of social relations such as kinship, ownership of property, or legal responsibility. The defining features of personhood and, consequently, what makes a person count as a person, differ widely among cultures and contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gary L. Francione</span> American legal scholar (born 1954)

Gary Lawrence Francione is an American academic in the fields of law and philosophy. He is Board of Governors Professor of Law and Katzenbach Scholar of Law and Philosophy at Rutgers University in New Jersey. He is also a visiting professor of philosophy at the University of Lincoln (UK) and honorary professor of philosophy at the University of East Anglia (UK). He is the author of numerous books and articles on animal ethics.

Steven M. Wise was an American lawyer and legal scholar who specialized in animal rights, primatology, and animal intelligence. He taught animal rights law at Harvard Law School, Vermont Law School, John Marshall Law School, Lewis & Clark Law School, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, and at the Master’s in Animal Law and Society of the Autonomous University of Barcelona. He was a former president of the Animal Legal Defense Fund and founder and president of the Nonhuman Rights Project. The Yale Law Journal had called him "one of the pistons of the animal rights movement."

Animal law is a combination of statutory and case law in which the nature – legal, social or biological – of nonhuman animals is an important factor. Animal law encompasses companion animals, wildlife, animals used in entertainment and animals raised for food and research. The emerging field of animal law is often analogized to the environmental law movement because "animal law faces many of the same legal and strategic challenges that environmental law faced in seeking to establish a more secure foothold in the United States and abroad".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal rights</span> Rights belonging to animals

Animal rights is the philosophy according to which many or all sentient animals have moral worth independent of their utility to humans, and that their most basic interests—such as avoiding suffering—should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings. The argument from marginal cases is often used to reach this conclusion. This argument holds that if marginal human beings such as infants, senile people, and the cognitively disabled are granted moral status and negative rights, then nonhuman animals must be granted the same moral consideration, since animals do not lack any known morally relevant characteristic that marginal-case humans have.

<i>The Case for Animal Rights</i> 1983 book by Tom Regan

The Case for Animal Rights is a 1983 book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the "subjects-of-a-life", and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized. The work is considered an important text within animal rights theory.

Plant rights are rights to which certain plants may be entitled. Such issues are often raised in connection with discussions about human rights, animal rights, biocentrism, or sentientism.

Personhood is the status of being a person. Defining personhood is a controversial topic in philosophy and law and is closely tied with legal and political concepts of citizenship, equality, and liberty. According to law, only a legal person has rights, protections, privileges, responsibilities, and legal liability.

Steven Frederic Sapontzis is an American moral philosopher. He is professor emeritus of philosophy at California State University, East Bay and specializes in animal ethics, environmental ethics and meta-ethics. His best known work is Morals, Reason, and Animals, published in 1987. Sapontzis' philosophy advocates for extending moral personhood and ethical consideration to animals based on their capacity for interests and suffering, challenging anthropocentric norms and speciesism, and instead promoting empathy, vegan activism, and systemic change to reduce animal exploitation.

<i>An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory</i> 2010 textbook by Alasdair Cochrane

An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory is a 2010 textbook by the British political theorist Alasdair Cochrane. It is the first book in the publisher Palgrave Macmillan's Animal Ethics Series, edited by Andrew Linzey and Priscilla Cohn. Cochrane's book examines five schools of political theory—utilitarianism, liberalism, communitarianism, Marxism and feminism—and their respective relationships with questions concerning animal rights and the political status of (non-human) animals. Cochrane concludes that each tradition has something to offer to these issues, but ultimately presents his own account of interest-based animal rights as preferable to any. His account, though drawing from all examined traditions, builds primarily upon liberalism and utilitarianism.

<i>Animal Rights Without Liberation</i> 2012 book by Alasdair Cochrane

Animal Rights Without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligations is a 2012 book by the British political theorist Alasdair Cochrane, in which it is argued that animal rights philosophy can be decoupled from animal liberation philosophy by the adoption of the interest-based rights approach. Cochrane, arguing that there is no reason that (nonhuman) animals should be excluded from justice, adopts Joseph Raz's account of interest rights and extends it to include animals. He argues that sentient animals possess a right not to be made to suffer and a right not to be killed, but not a right to freedom. The book's chapters apply Cochrane's account to a number of interactions between humans and animals; first animal experimentation, then animal agriculture, the genetic engineering of animals, the use of animals in entertainment and sport, the relationship of animals to environmental practices and the use of animals in cultural practices.

John Hadley is an Australian philosopher whose research concerns moral and political philosophy, including animal ethics, environmental ethics, and metaethics. He is currently a senior lecturer in philosophy in the School of Humanities and Communication Arts at Western Sydney University. He has previously taught at Charles Sturt University and the University of Sydney, where he studied as an undergraduate and doctoral candidate. In addition to a variety of articles in peer-reviewed journals and edited collections, he is the author of the 2015 monograph Animal Property Rights and the 2019 monograph Animal Neopragmatism. He is also the co-editor, with Elisa Aaltola, of the 2015 collection Animal Ethics and Philosophy.

<i>Political Animals and Animal Politics</i> Collection of papers about animal ethics

Political Animals and Animal Politics is a 2014 edited collection published by Palgrave Macmillan and edited by the green political theorists Marcel Wissenburg and David Schlosberg. The work addresses the emergence of academic animal ethics informed by political philosophy as opposed to moral philosophy. It was the first edited collection to be published on the topic, and the first book-length attempt to explore the breadth and boundaries of the literature. As well as a substantial introduction by the editors, it features ten sole-authored chapters split over three parts, respectively concerning institutional change for animals, the relationship between animal ethics and ecologism, and real-world laws made for the benefit of animals. The book's contributors were Wissenburg, Schlosberg, Manuel Arias-Maldonado, Chad Flanders, Christie Smith, Clemens Driessen, Simon Otjes, Kurtis Boyer, Per-Anders Svärd, and Mihnea Tanasescu. The focus of their individual chapters varies, but recurring features include discussions of human exceptionalism, exploration of ways that animal issues are or could be present in political discourse, and reflections on the relationship between theory and practice in politics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gary Varner</span> American philosopher (1957–2023)

Gary Edward Varner was an American philosopher specializing in environmental ethics, philosophical questions related to animal rights and animal welfare, and R. M. Hare's two-level utilitarianism. At the time of his death, he was an emeritus professor in the department of philosophy at Texas A&M University; he had been based at the university since 1990. He was educated at Arizona State University, the University of Georgia, and the University of Wisconsin–Madison; at Madison, where he was supervised by Jon Morline, he wrote one of the first doctoral theses on environmental ethics. Varner's first monograph was In Nature's Interests?, which was published by Oxford University Press in 1998. In the book, Varner defended a form of biocentric individualism, according to which all living entities have morally considerable interests.

<i>Sentientist Politics</i> 2018 book by Alasdair Cochrane

Sentientist Politics: A Theory of Global Inter-Species Justice is a 2018 book by the English political theorist Alasdair Cochrane, published by Oxford University Press. In the book, Cochrane outlines and defends his political theory of "sentientist cosmopolitan democracy". The approach is sentientist in that it recognises all sentient animals as bearers of rights; cosmopolitan in that it extends cosmopolitan political theory to include animals, rejecting the importance of state borders and endorsing impartiality; and democratic in that it aims to include animals in systems of representative and cosmopolitan democracy. It was the first book to extend cosmopolitan theory to animals, and was a contribution to the "political turn" in animal ethics – animal ethics informed by political philosophy.

<i>Moral Inquiries on the Situation of Man and of Brutes</i> 1824 book by Lewis Gompertz

Moral Inquiries on the Situation of Man and of Brutes is an 1824 book by Lewis Gompertz, an early animal rights advocate and vegan. The book argues that animals, like humans, are sentient beings capable of experiencing pain and pleasure, and thus deserve moral consideration. He critiques the exploitation of animals for labour, food, and clothing, condemning practices such as slaughter, hunting, and scientific experimentation. He also addresses the suffering of wild animals, suggesting that even in nature, animals face hardships such as hunger and predation.

<i>Evolutional Ethics and Animal Psychology</i> 1897 book by Edward Payson Evans

Evolutional Ethics and Animal Psychology is an 1897 book by the American scholar and early animal rights advocate Edward Payson Evans. It is an in-depth exploration of the intersection between ethical theory and animal psychology, with a particular focus on the rights of animals and the moral obligations humans have toward them.

<i>The Moral Circle</i> 2025 book by Jeff Sebo

The Moral Circle: Who Matters, What Matters, and Why is a 2025 book by philosopher Jeff Sebo. In the book, Sebo calls for a fundamental shift in ethics, advocating for the expansion of humanity's moral circle to include not just humans, but also animals, insects, AI systems, and even microbes. He critiques human exceptionalism, emphasizing how human current treatment of nonhumans—whether through factory farming, captivity, or technological development—often neglects their interests. Through case studies on captive elephants, farmed insects, and the ethical dilemmas of creating digital minds, Sebo explores how expanding the moral circle could transform society. As humanity continues to reshape the world, he argues for a rethinking of human ethical responsibilities and the implementation of systemic changes to create a more just and inclusive future.

References

  1. Nurse, Angus (March 2024). "Book Review: Animal Rights Law by Raffael N Fasel and Sean C Butler". Environmental Law Review. 26 (1): 85–87. doi:10.1177/14614529241242005. ISSN   1461-4529.
  2. Sowery, Katy (March 2024). "Rafael N.Fasel and Sean C.Butler, Animal Rights Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 240 pp, pb £24.99". The Modern Law Review . 87 (2): 526–531. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12840. ISSN   0026-7961.
  3. Atlas, Bianka M.A. (2 January 2024). "Animal Rights Law: Rafael N Fasel and Sean C Butler, Hart Publishing, 2023, 240 pp, ISBN 9781509956104 (paperback)". Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy. 27 (1): 42–46. doi:10.1080/13880292.2024.2342161. ISSN   1388-0292.
  4. Rowan, Andrew (2 November 2023). "'Animal Rights Law'". WellBeing International. Retrieved 1 February 2025.
  5. "Animal Rights Law". Bloomsbury Publishing . Archived from the original on 28 November 2023. Retrieved 1 February 2025.