Author | Thomas Young |
---|---|
Language | English |
Subject | Animal ethics, Christian theology |
Publisher | T. Cadell, Jun. and W. Davies; W. H. Lunn; J. Deighton |
Publication date | 9 March 1798 |
Publication place | United Kingdom |
Media type | Print (hardcover) |
Pages | 202 |
OCLC | 1422462229 |
An Essay on Humanity to Animals is a 1798 book by English theologian Thomas Young. It advocates for the ethical treatment and welfare of animals. It argues for recognizing animals' natural rights and condemns the various forms of cruelty inflicted upon them in human activities. Drawing on moral, scriptural, and philosophical reasoning, Young emphasizes the moral duty to prevent animal suffering and to adopt humane practices.
The book examines several issues, including the cruelty observed in children's behaviour, the brutality of blood sports, and the unnecessary harm caused by hunting and fishing for leisure. It also critiques the inhumane treatment of animals in agriculture and food production. Throughout, Young highlights animals' sentience and capacity for suffering, urging readers to recognize their ethical responsibility to ensure humane treatment.
The book is divided into several chapters, each addressing a specific aspect of human-animal relationships. The opening chapter establishes the connection between cruelty to animals and broader societal brutality. Young argues that acts of violence against animals desensitise individuals, fostering a general disposition of cruelty that can extend to human interactions. He underscores this by highlighting animals' sentience—their ability to perceive pleasure and pain—and argues that this capacity places a moral obligation on humans to treat them with compassion. He describes animal rights as stemming from the natural world and the Creator's will, asserting that animals' capacity for suffering establishes their moral entitlement to humane treatment. Young links humanity's treatment of animals with moral and spiritual well-being, drawing on Christian teachings and natural evidence to emphasise the duty of compassion and the Creator's intention for the happiness of all sentient beings.
Subsequent chapters focus on particular forms of cruelty. Young highlights the dangers of allowing children to torment animals, suggesting that such behaviour, if unchecked, can lead to callousness in adulthood. He then turns to the cruelty inherent in popular entertainment, such as bull-baiting, cockfighting, and hunting for sport, which he condemns for promoting insensitivity and vice. Similarly, he criticises practices like fishing and shooting for pleasure, arguing that they inflict unnecessary suffering and lack moral justification.
Young dedicates a chapter to the mistreatment of horses, which he describes as noble and indispensable animals often subjected to overwork, mutilation, and abuse. He calls for better treatment of horses, emphasising their loyalty and the significant role they play in human industry and transportation. He also addresses food-related cruelty, such as skinning animals alive or crimping fish, practices he deems both inhumane and unnecessary. Additionally, Young critiques the common practice of killing bees to harvest honey, suggesting alternative methods that allow humans to benefit from bees' labor without destroying their colonies.
The essay concludes with a discussion of miscellaneous cruelties, including the mistreatment of dogs, which Young highlights as one of the most loyal and intelligent of animals. Through anecdotes and observations, he illustrates the profound attachment animals can have to humans and the moral failings of those who repay such loyalty with neglect or abuse.
A reviewer for The Monthly Review commended An Essay on Humanity to Animals for its eloquence and moral advocacy, highlighting poignant stories like a polar bear's sacrifices to save her cubs. It praised the work's ability to inspire compassion and promote humane treatment of animals, considering it a significant contribution to the cause of animal welfare. [1]
The Monthly Mirror praised the book for its compelling arguments against animal cruelty, recommending it to those involved in activities like horse racing and cockfighting. The review highlighted its engaging style, zoological examples, and emphasis on animals' capacity for suffering. [2]
The British Critic praised the work's benevolence and moral arguments, though noted occasional over-refinement. It recommended the work for those overseeing children's education due to its potential positive influence. The review supported its criticism of practices like bird-netting, hunting, and cockfighting, and praised its introductory Ode to Humanity as elegant and fitting. [3]
In his 1892 work Animals' Rights: Considered in Relation to Social Progress, Henry S. Salt listed An Essay on Humanity to Animals in the bibliography on animal rights. [4] Benjamin Bryan included a quotation from Young's book on animal rights in his 1895 book Anti-Vivisection Evidences. [5] Additionally, it was listed in the bibliography of Edward Payson Evans' 1898 book Evolutional Ethics and Animal Psychology . [6]
According to animal rights historian Rod Preece, John Styles's essay, The Animal Creation: Its Claims on Our Humanity Stated and Enforced, appears to have borrowed extensively from Young's earlier writings, potentially amounting to plagiarism. [7] In "The Status of Animals in Biblical and Christian Thought", Preece compared Young to contemporary church animal welfare proponents Richard Dean and Humphrey Primatt. [8]
In 2013, the American Philosophical Society Library featured Young's work in a web exhibit showcasing historical texts on animal studies, ranging from natural history to modern animal rights. [9]
Benjamin Curtis describes An Essay on Humanity to Animals as the first known work to provide detailed accounts of the cruelty inflicted on animals by humans, distinguishing it as a significant milestone in the development of animal rights literature. [10]
The book was published on 9 March 1798 by T. Cadell, Jun. and W. Davies in the Strand, with additional distribution by W. H. Lunn in Oxford Street and J. Deighton in Cambridge. [11] An abridged version was published in 1804 by Knott and Lloyd in Birmingham. [12]
In 2001, Rod Preece released an edited volume through Edwin Mellen Press, which included an introduction, annotations, and a foreword contributed by David Fraser. [13]
Speciesism is a term used in philosophy regarding the treatment of individuals of different species. The term has several different definitions. Some specifically define speciesism as discrimination or unjustified treatment based on an individual's species membership, while others define it as differential treatment without regard to whether the treatment is justified or not. Richard D. Ryder, who coined the term, defined it as "a prejudice or attitude of bias in favour of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species". Speciesism results in the belief that humans have the right to use non-human animals in exploitative ways which is pervasive in the modern society. Studies from 2015 and 2019 suggest that people who support animal exploitation also tend to have intersectional bias that encapsulates and endorses racist, sexist, and other prejudicial views, which furthers the beliefs in human supremacy and group dominance to justify systems of inequality and oppression.
In the animal rights movement, cruelty-free is a label for products or activities that do not harm or kill animals anywhere in the world. Products tested on animals or made from animals are not considered cruelty-free, since these tests are often painful and cause the suffering and death of millions of animals every year.
Muriel Dowding, Baroness Dowding was an English humanitarian and animal rights activist known for championing anti-vivisection, vegetarianism and the improvement of animal welfare. Like her second husband Lord Dowding, 1st Baron Dowding she was a vegetarian, an anti-vivisectionist, spiritualist and theosophist. She coined the term cruelty-free and was a pioneer of the cruelty-free movement.
Contemporary debates about animal welfare and animal rights can be traced back to ancient history. Records from as early as the 6th century before the common era (BCE) include discussions of animal ethics in Jain and Greek texts. The relations between humans and nonnhumans are also discussed in the books of Exodus and Genesis, Jewish writings from the 6th or 5th century BCE.
The Humanitarian League was a British radical advocacy group formed by Henry S. Salt and others to promote the principle that it is wrong to inflict avoidable suffering on any sentient being. It was based in London and operated between 1891 and 1919.
The concept of moral rights for animals is believed to date as far back as Ancient India, particularly early Jainist and Hindu history. What follows is mainly the history of animal rights in the Western world. There is a rich history of animal protection in the ancient texts, lives, and stories of Eastern, African, and Indigenous peoples.
Our Dumb Animals was an American animal welfare magazine published from 1868 to 1970 by the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; it was founded and edited by George T. Angell, the founder of the society.
Lewis Gompertz was an English activist, philosopher, writer and inventor. He dedicated his life to promoting animal rights and welfare, and veganism.
Tza'ar ba'alei chayim, literally "suffering of living creatures", is a Jewish commandment which bans causing animals unnecessary suffering. This concept is not clearly enunciated in the written Torah, but was accepted by Talmudic scholars as being a biblical mandate. It is linked in the Talmud from the biblical law requiring people to assist in unloading burdens from animals.
William Youatt was an English veterinary surgeon and animal welfare writer.
William Hamilton Drummond, D.D. was an Irish poet, animal rights writer and controversialist.
The relationship between Christianity and animal rights is complex, with different Christian communities coming to different conclusions about the status of animals. The topic is closely related to, but broader than, the practices of Christian vegetarians and the various Christian environmentalist movements.
Animal welfare and rights in South Africa is about the treatment of and laws concerning non-human animals in South Africa.
John Howard Moore was an American zoologist, philosopher, educator, and social reformer. He was best known for his advocacy of ethical vegetarianism and his pioneering role in the animal rights movement, both deeply influenced by his ethical interpretation of Darwin's theory of evolution. Moore's most influential work, The Universal Kinship (1906), introduced a sentiocentric philosophy he called the doctrine of Universal Kinship, arguing that the ethical treatment of animals, rooted in the Golden Rule, is essential for human ethical evolution, urging humans to extend their moral considerations to all sentient beings, based on their shared physical and mental evolutionary kinship.
Henry Crowe was an English Anglican clergyman and early animal rights writer.
Moral Inquiries on the Situation of Man and of Brutes is an 1824 book by Lewis Gompertz, an early animal rights advocate and vegan. The book argues that animals, like humans, are sentient beings capable of experiencing pain and pleasure, and thus deserve moral consideration. He critiques the exploitation of animals for labour, food, and clothing, condemning practices such as slaughter, hunting, and scientific experimentation. He also addresses the suffering of wild animals, suggesting that even in nature, animals face hardships such as hunger and predation.
John Styles was an English Congregational minister and animal welfare writer.
Insects and human ethical obligations towards them have been discussed by a number of writers and figures throughout history, many of whom, arguing from a variety of different perspectives, have contended that there exists a moral obligation towards not harming or killing insects. According to generally accepted definitions in animal welfare and agricultural ethics, however, it is argued that individual insects do not have a "right to life".
Rodney John Charles Preece was an English-Canadian political philosopher and historian of animal rights and vegetarianism. He was professor emeritus in the Department of Political Science at Wilfrid Laurier University. Preece authored and edited 19 books on topics including animal rights and welfare, vegetarianism, German politics, socialization in Europe, and political theory.
Thomas Young was an English Anglican clergyman, theologian, educator, and writer. Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, he became a Fellow in 1795, and served as both a tutor and dean. Young was ordained as a deacon in 1801 and as a priest in 1802. In 1813, he was appointed Rector of Gilling East, Yorkshire, a position he held until his death.