Baltic Way

Last updated • 14 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
The Baltic Way
Part of the Singing Revolution, the Revolutions of 1989, and the Dissolution of the Soviet Union
Baltic Way in Moteris magazine.jpeg
The Baltic Way: The human chain connecting the three Baltic capitals – Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius.
Date23 August 1989;35 years ago (1989-08-23)
Location Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (three countries occupied by the Soviet Union)
Also known asBaltic Chain of Freedom
Cause50th anniversary of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact
ParticipantsAbout 2 million people
OutcomeIndependence of the three countries was regained by August 1991

The Baltic Way (Lithuanian : Baltijos kelias; Latvian : Baltijas ceļš; Estonian : Balti kett) or Baltic Chain (also "Chain of Freedom" [1] ) was a peaceful political demonstration that occurred on 23 August 1989. Approximately two million people joined their hands to form a human chain spanning 690 kilometres (430 mi) across the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which at the time were occupied and annexed by the USSR and had a combined population of approximately eight million. [2] The central government in Moscow considered the three Baltic countries constituent republics of the Soviet Union.

Contents

The demonstration originated in "Black Ribbon Day" protests held in the western cities in the 1980s. It marked the 50th anniversary of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, in which Poland, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Romania were (as "spheres of influence") divided between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. The Soviet-Nazi pact led to the outbreak of World War II in September 1939 and the Soviet invasion and occupation of the Baltic countries in June 1940.

The 1989 event was organised by the Baltic pro-independence movements: Rahvarinne of Estonia, the Tautas fronte of Latvia, and Sąjūdis of Lithuania, to draw global attention by demonstrating a popular desire for independence and showcasing solidarity among the three nations. It has been described as an effective publicity campaign, and an emotionally captivating and visually stunning scene. [3] [4]

The event presented an opportunity for the Baltic activists to publicise the Soviet rule and position the question of Baltic independence not only as a political matter, but also as a moral issue. The Soviet authorities responded to the event with intense rhetoric, [3] but failed to take any constructive actions that could bridge the widening gap between the Baltic republics and the rest of the Soviet Union. Seven months after the protest Lithuania became the first Soviet republic to declare independence.

The 23 August 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact divided "the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania)" into German and Soviet "spheres of influence" (German copy) Hitler Stalin Pakt Geheimes Zusatzprotokoll.jpg
The 23 August 1939 Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact divided "the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania)" into German and Soviet "spheres of influence" (German copy)
Poster denouncing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact Poster denouncing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.jpeg
Poster denouncing the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact

After the Revolutions of 1989, 23 August has become an official remembrance day both in the Baltic countries, in the European Union and in other countries, known as the Black Ribbon Day or as the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism.

Background

Baltic stance

The Soviet Union denied the existence of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact's secret protocols which had ceded control of the Baltic states to the USSR, even though the protocol texts had been used as evidence during the Nuremberg Trials and had been published worldwide by Western scholars. [5] Soviet propaganda also maintained that there was no occupation and that all three Baltic states had voluntarily joined the Union – the People's Parliaments had expressed people's will when they petitioned the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union to be admitted into the Union. [6] The Baltic states claimed that they were forcefully and illegally incorporated into the Soviet Union. Popular opinion was that the secret protocols proved that the occupation was illegal. [7]

Such an interpretation of the Pact had major implications for the Baltics' public policy. If Baltic diplomats could link the Pact and the occupation, they could claim that the Soviet rule in the republics had no legal basis and therefore all Soviet laws had been null and void since 1940. [8] Such a position would automatically terminate the debate over reforming Baltic sovereignty or establishing autonomy within the Soviet Union – the states would have never belonged de jure to the union in the first place. [9] This would open the possibility of restoring legal continuity of the independent states that had existed during the interwar period. Claiming that no Soviet laws had legal power in the Baltics would also cancel the need to follow the Constitution of the Soviet Union and other formal secession procedures. [10]

In anticipation of the 50th anniversary of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, tensions were rising between the Baltics and Moscow. Lithuanian politician Romualdas Ozolas initiated a collection of 2 million signatures to demand withdrawal of the Red Army from Lithuania. [11] The Communist Party of Lithuania was deliberating the possibility of splitting off from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. [12] On 8 August 1989, Estonians attempted to amend election laws to limit voting rights of new immigrants (mostly Russian workers). [13] This provoked mass strikes and protests by Russian workers. Moscow gained an opportunity to present the events as an "inter-ethnic conflict" [14] – it could then position itself as "peacemaker" restoring order in a troubled republic. [15]

The rising tensions in anticipation of the protest spurred hopes that Moscow would react by announcing constructive reforms to address the demands of the Baltic people. [16] At the same time fears grew of violent clampdown. Erich Honecker from East Germany and Nicolae Ceaușescu from Romania offered the Soviet Union military assistance in case it decided to use force and break up the demonstration. [17]

Soviet response

On 15 August 1989, in response to worker strikes in Estonia, Pravda , the official daily newspaper of the Soviet Union, published sharp criticism of "hysteria" driven by "extremist elements" pursuing selfish "narrow nationalist positions" against the greater benefit of the entire Soviet Union. [13] On 17 August, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union published a project of new policy regarding the union republics in Pravda. However, this project offered few new ideas: it preserved Moscow's leadership not only in foreign policy and defense, but also in economy, science, and culture. [18] The project made a few cautious concessions: it proposed the republics have the right to challenge national laws in a court (at the time all three Baltic states had amended their constitutions giving their Supreme Soviets the right to veto national laws) [19] and the right to promote their national languages to the level of the official state language (at the same time the project emphasised the leading role of the Russian language). [18] The project also included laws banning "nationalist and chauvinist organisations", which could be used to persecute pro-independence groups in the Baltics, [19] and a proposal to replace the Treaty on the Creation of the USSR of 1922 with a new unifying agreement, which would be part of the Soviet constitution. [18]

On 18 August, Pravda published an extensive interview with Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev, [20] chairman of a 26-member commission set up by the Congress of People's Deputies to investigate the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and its secret protocols. [5] During the interview, Yakovlev admitted that the secret protocols were genuine. He condemned the protocols, but maintained that they had no impact on the incorporation of the Baltic states. [21] Thus Moscow reversed its long-standing position that the secret protocols did not exist or were forgeries, but did not concede that events of 1940 constituted an occupation. It was clearly not enough to satisfy the Baltics and on 22 August, a commission of the Supreme Soviet of the Lithuanian SSR announced that the occupation in 1940 was a direct result of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and therefore illegal. [22] It was the first time that an official Soviet body challenged the legitimacy of the Soviet rule. [23] [24]

Protest

Preparation

In the light of glasnost and perestroika , street demonstrations had been increasingly growing in popularity and support. On 23 August 1986, Black Ribbon Day demonstrations were held in 21 western cities including New York, Ottawa, London, Stockholm, Seattle, Los Angeles, Perth, and Washington, DC to bring worldwide attention to human rights violations by the Soviet Union. In 1987, Black Ribbon Day protests were held in 36 cities including Vilnius, Lithuania. Protests against the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact were also held in Tallinn and Riga in 1987. In 1988, for the first time, such protests were sanctioned by the Soviet authorities and did not end in arrests. [8] The activists planned an especially large protest for the 50th anniversary of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact in 1989. It is unclear when and by whom the idea of a human chain was advanced. It appears that the idea was proposed during a trilateral meeting in Pärnu on 15 July. [25] An official agreement between the Baltic activists was signed in Cēsis on 12 August. [26] Local Communist Party authorities approved the protest. [27] At the same time several different petitions, denouncing Soviet occupation, were gathering hundreds of thousands of signatures. [28]

The organisers mapped out the chain, designating specific locations to specific cities and towns to make sure that the chain would be uninterrupted. Free bus rides were provided for those who did not have other transportation. [29] Preparations spread across the country, energising the previously uninvolved rural population. [30] Some employers did not allow workers to take the day off from work (23 August fell on a Wednesday), while others sponsored the bus rides. [29] On the day of the event, special radio broadcasts helped to coordinate the effort. [27] Estonia declared a public holiday. [31]

The Baltic pro-independence movements issued a joint declaration to the world and European community in the name of the protest. The declaration condemned the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, calling it a criminal act, and urged declaration that the pact was "null and void from the moment of signing". [32] The declaration said that the question of the Baltics was a "problem of inalienable human rights" and accused the European community of "double standards" and turning a blind eye to the "last colonies of Hitler–Stalin era". [32] On the day of the protest, Pravda published an editorial titled "Only the Facts". It was a collection of quotes from pro-independence activists intended to show the unacceptable anti-Soviet nature of their work. [33]

Human chain

Airplane flying over the human chain Airplane over the Baltic Way.jpeg
Airplane flying over the human chain
Baltic Way demonstration in Siauliai, Lithuania. The symbolic coffins decorated with national flags of the three Baltic countries and placed under the flags of Nazi Germany and Soviet Union. 1989 08 23Siauliai1Baltijos kelias.jpg
Baltic Way demonstration in Šiauliai, Lithuania. The symbolic coffins decorated with national flags of the three Baltic countries and placed under the flags of Nazi Germany and Soviet Union.

The chain connected the three Baltic capitals – Vilnius, Riga, and Tallinn. It ran from Vilnius along the A2 highway through Širvintos and Ukmergė to Panevėžys, then along the Via Baltica through Pasvalys to Bauska in Latvia and through Iecava and Ķekava to Riga (Bauska highway, Ziepniekkalna street, Mūkusalas street, Stone bridge, Kaļķu street, Brīvības street) and then along road A2, through Vangaži, Sigulda, Līgatne, Mūrnieki and Drabeši, to Cēsis, from there, through Lode, to Valmiera and then through Jēči, Lizdēni, Rencēni  [ et ], Oleri, Rūjiena and Ķoņi to Estonian town Karksi-Nuia and from there through Viljandi, Türi and Rapla to Tallinn. [34] [35] The demonstrators peacefully linked hands for 15 minutes at 19:00 local time (16:00 GMT). [6] Later, a number of local gatherings and protests took place. In Vilnius, about 5,000 people gathered in the Cathedral Square, holding candles and singing national songs, including Tautiška giesmė . [36] Elsewhere, priests held masses or rang church bells. Leaders of the Estonian and Latvian Popular Fronts gathered on the border between their two republics for a symbolic funeral ceremony, in which a giant black cross was set alight. [31] The protesters held candles and pre-war national flags decorated with black ribbons in memory of the victims of the Soviet terror: Forest Brothers, deportees to Siberia, political prisoners, and other "enemies of the people". [24] [36]

In Moscow's Pushkin Square, ranks of special riot police were employed when a few hundred people tried to stage a sympathy demonstration. TASS said 75 were detained for breaches of the peace, petty vandalism, and other offences. [36] About 13,000 demonstrated in the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic which was also affected by the secret protocol. [37] A demonstration was held by the Baltic émigré and German sympathizers in front of the Soviet embassy in Bonn, then West Germany.

Measure [38] EstoniaLatviaLithuania
Total population (1989)1.6M2.7M3.7M
Indigenous population (1959)75%62%79%
Indigenous population (1989)61%52% [39] 80%

Most estimates of the number of participants vary between one and two million. Reuters News reported the following day that about 700,000 Estonians and 1,000,000 Lithuanians joined the protests. [37] The Latvian Popular Front estimated an attendance of 400,000. [40] Prior to the event, the organisers expected an attendance of 1,500,000 out of the about 8,000,000 inhabitants of the three states. [36] Such expectations predicted 25–30% turnout among the native population. [30] According to the official Soviet numbers, provided by TASS, there were 300,000 participants in Estonia and nearly 500,000 in Lithuania. [36] To make the chain physically possible, an attendance of approximately 200,000 people was required in each state. [6] Video footage taken from airplanes and helicopters showed an almost continuous line of people across the countryside. [23]

Immediate aftermath

"Matters have gone far. There is a serious threat to the fate of the Baltic peoples. People should know the abyss into which they are being pushed by their nationalistic leaders. Should they achieve their goals, the possible consequences could be catastrophic to these nations. A question could arise as to their very existence."

Declaration of the Central Committee on the situation in the Soviet Baltic republics, 26 August [41]

On 26 August 1989, a pronouncement from the Central Committee of the Communist Party was read during the opening 19 minutes of Vremya , the main evening news program on Soviet television. [42] It was a sternly worded warning about growing "nationalist, extremist groups" which advanced "anti-socialist and anti-Soviet" agendas. [43] The announcement claimed that these groups discriminated against ethnic minorities and terrorised those still loyal to Soviet ideals. [43] Local authorities were openly criticised for their failure to stop these activists. [33] The Baltic Way was referred to as a "nationalist hysteria". According to the pronouncement, such developments would lead to an "abyss" and "catastrophic" consequences. [28] The workers and peasants were called on to save the situation and defend Soviet ideals. [33] Overall, there were mixed messages: while indirectly threatening the use of force, it also placed hopes that the conflict could be solved via diplomatic means. It was interpreted that the Central Committee had not yet decided which way to go and had left both possibilities open. [44] The call to pro-Soviet masses illustrated that Moscow believed it still had a significant audience in the Baltics. [33] Sharp criticism of Baltic Communist Parties was interpreted as signalling that Moscow would attempt to replace their leadership. [44] However, almost immediately after the broadcast, the tone in Moscow began to soften [45] and the Soviet authorities failed to follow up on any of their threats. [46] Eventually, according to historian Alfred Erich Senn, the pronouncement became a source of embarrassment. [46]

President of the United States George H. W. Bush [47] and chancellor of West Germany Helmut Kohl urged peaceful reforms and criticised the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. [48] On 31 August, the Baltic activists issued a joint declaration to Javier Pérez de Cuéllar, Secretary-General of the United Nations. [49] They claimed to be under threat of aggression and asked for an international commission to be sent to monitor the situation. On 19–20 September, the Central Committee of the Communist Party convened to discuss the nationality question – something Mikhail Gorbachev had been postponing since early 1988. [50] The plenum did not specifically address the situation in the Baltic states and reaffirmed old principles regarding the centralised Soviet Union and the dominant role of the Russian language. [51] It did promise some increase in autonomy, but was contradictory and failed to address the underlying reasons for the conflict. [52]

Evaluation

Baltic Way Monument in Vilnius Baltic Way Monument.JPG
Baltic Way Monument in Vilnius
Litas commemorative coin dedicated to the Baltic Way LT-2014-25litai-Baltijos kelias-b.png
Litas commemorative coin dedicated to the Baltic Way

The human chain helped to publicise the Baltic cause around the world and symbolised solidarity among the Baltic peoples. [53] The positive image of the non-violent Singing Revolution spread among the western media. [54] The activists, including Vytautas Landsbergis, used the increased exposure to position the debate over Baltic independence as a moral, and not just political question: reclaiming independence would be restoration of historical justice and liquidation of Stalinism. [55] [56] It was an emotional event, strengthening the determination to seek independence. The protest highlighted that the pro-independence movements, established just a year before, became more assertive and radical: they shifted from demanding greater freedom from Moscow to full independence. [23]

In December 1989, the Congress of People's Deputies accepted and Mikhail Gorbachev signed the report by Yakovlev's commission condemning the secret protocols of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. [57] In February 1990, the first free democratic elections to the Supreme Soviets took place in all three Baltic states and pro-independence candidates won majorities. On 11 March 1990, within seven months of the Baltic Way, Lithuania became the first Soviet state to declare independence. The independence of all three Baltic states was recognised by most western countries by the end of 1991.

This protest was one of the earliest and longest unbroken human chains in history. Similar human chains were later organised in many East European countries and regions of the USSR and, more recently, in Taiwan (228 Hand-in-Hand Rally) and Catalonia (Catalan Way). On the 30th anniversary of the Baltic Way, a 30-mile (48 km) human chain called the Hong Kong Way was formed during the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests. [58] On August 23, 2020, the Baltic states did a reenactment including Belarus for Belarusian activists. [59] Documents recording the Baltic Way were added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 2009 in recognition of their value in documenting history. [60] [61]

See also

Notes

    1. ↑ Wolchik, Sharon L.; Jane Leftwich Curry (2007). Central and East European Politics: From Communism to Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 238. ISBN   978-0-7425-4068-2.
    2. ↑ Aliide Naylor, The Shadow in the East: Vladimir Putin and the New Baltic Front (2020).
    3. 1 2 Dreifelds, Juris (1996). Latvia in Transition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 34–35. ISBN   0-521-55537-X.
    4. ↑ Anušauskas 2005, p. 619.
    5. 1 2 United Press International (12 August 1989). "Baltic Deal / Soviets Publish Secret Hitler Pact". The San Francisco Chronicle.
    6. 1 2 3 Conradi, Peter (18 August 1989). "Hundreds of Thousands to Demonstrate in Soviet Baltics". Reuters News.
    7. ↑ Senn 1995, p. 33.
    8. 1 2 Dejevsky, Mary (23 August 1989). "Baltic Groups Plan Mass Protest; Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia's Struggle for Independence". The Times.
    9. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 336.
    10. ↑ Senn 1995, p. 91.
    11. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, pp. 317, 326.
    12. ↑ Conradi, Peter (16 August 1989). "Lithuania's Communist Party Considers Split from Moscow". Reuters.
    13. 1 2 Fisher, Matthew (16 August 1989). "Moscow Condemns 'Hysteria' in Baltics". The Globe and Mail .
    14. ↑ Blitz, James (16 August 1989). "Moscow Voices Growing Concern Over Ethnic Conflict". Financial Times . p. 2.
    15. ↑ Senn 1995, p. 30.
    16. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 330.
    17. ↑ Ashbourne, Alexandra (1999). Lithuania: The Rebirth of a Nation, 1991–1994. Lexington Books. p. 24. ISBN   0-7391-0027-0.
    18. 1 2 3 Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 334.
    19. 1 2 "Soviet party leaders accept Baltic demand". Houston Chronicle . Associated Press. 17 August 1989.
    20. ↑ Vardys, Vytas Stanley; Judith B. Sedaitis (1997). Lithuania: The Rebel Nation. Westview Series on the Post-Soviet Republics. Westview Press. pp. 150–151. ISBN   0-8133-1839-4.
    21. ↑ Remnick, David (19 August 1989). "Kremlin Acknowledges Secret Pact on Baltics; Soviets Deny Republics Annexed Illegally". The Washington Post.
    22. ↑ Senn 1995, p. 66.
    23. 1 2 3 Fein, Esther B. (24 August 1989). "Baltic Citizens Link Hands to Demand Independence". The New York Times.
    24. 1 2 Dobbs, Michael (24 August 1989). "Huge Protest 50 Years After Soviet Seizure". The San Francisco Chronicle.
    25. ↑ Anušauskas 2005, p. 617.
    26. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 326 Full text Archived 2011-07-23 at the Wayback Machine .
    27. 1 2 Dobbs, Michael (24 August 1989). "Baltic States Link in Protest 'So Our Children Can Be Free'; 'Chain' Participants Decry Soviet Takeover". The Washington Post.
    28. 1 2 Imse, Ann (27 August 1989). "Baltic Residents Make Bold New Push For Independence". Associated Press.[ permanent dead link ]
    29. 1 2 Alanen 2004 , p.  100
    30. 1 2 Alanen 2004 , p.  78
    31. 1 2 Lodge, Robin (23 August 1989). "More than Two Million Join Human Chain in Soviet Baltics". Reuters News.
    32. 1 2 "The Baltic Way" (PDF). Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian National Commissions for UNESCO. 17 August 1989. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 20 August 2009.
    33. 1 2 3 4 Senn 1995, p. 67.
    34. ↑ ""Tautas frontes muzeja ekspozīcijas "Atmoda – LTF – Neatkarība" mākslinieciskā risinājuma realizācija"" [“People's Front Museum expositions "Awakening – LTF – Independence" realization of an artistic solution”]. www.ltfmuz.lv. Archived from the original on 2013-12-26. Retrieved 2013-07-10.
    35. ↑ "The Baltic Way". Archived from the original on 25 July 2013. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
    36. 1 2 3 4 5 Imse, Ann (23 August 1989). "Baltic Residents Form Human Chain in Defiance of Soviet Rule". Associated Press.
    37. 1 2 Lodge, Robin (23 August 1989). "Human Chain Spanning: Soviet Baltics Shows Nationalist Feeling". Reuters News.
    38. ↑ Dobbs, Michael (27 August 1989). "Independence Fever Sets Up Confrontation". The Washington Post.
    39. ↑ Mezs, Ilmars (1994). The Ethnic Aspects of Population Change in Latvia After Independence (Master's thesis). Western Michigan University. p. 11.
    40. ↑ "Pravda chides Baltic activists". Tulsa World. Associated Press. 24 August 1989.
    41. ↑ Misiunas, Romuald J.; Rein Taagepera (1993). The Baltic States: Years of Dependence 1940–1990 (expanded ed.). University of California Press. p.  328. ISBN   0-520-08228-1.
    42. ↑ Fein, Esther B. (27 August 1989). "Moscow Condemns nationalist 'Virus' in 3 Baltic Lands". The New York Times.
    43. 1 2 Remnick, David (27 August 1989). "Kremlin Condemns Baltic Nationalists; Soviets Warn Separatism Risks 'Disaster'". The Washington Post.
    44. 1 2 Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 347.
    45. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 350.
    46. 1 2 Senn 1995, p. 69.
    47. ↑ Hines, Cragg (29 August 1989). "Bush Urges Restraint in Baltics Dealings". Houston Chronicle.
    48. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, pp. 351–352.
    49. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 352.
    50. ↑ Senn 1995, p. 70.
    51. ↑ Laurinavičius & Sirutavičius 2008, p. 361.
    52. ↑ Winfrey, Paul (25 September 1989). "Flaws in Soviet Plan to End Strife: Moscow's Attempt to Cope with Nationalist Turmoil". Financial Times.
    53. ↑ Taagepera, Rein (1993). Estonia: Return to Independence. Westview Series on the Post-Soviet Republics. Westview Press. p. 157. ISBN   0-8133-1703-7.[ permanent dead link ]
    54. ↑ Plakans, Andrejs (1995). The Latvians: A Short History. Studies of Nationalities. Hoover Press. p. 174. ISBN   0-8179-9302-9.
    55. ↑ Katell, Andrew (22 August 1989). "Baltics Call Soviet Annexation a 'Crime,' Equate Hitler, Stalin". Associated Press.
    56. ↑ Senn 1995, p. 155.
    57. ↑ Senn 1995, p. 78.
    58. ↑ Rasmi, Adam (23 August 2019). "Hong Kong emulates a human chain that broke Soviet rule". MSN.
    59. ↑
    60. ↑ "Thirty-Five Documentary Properties Added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register". ArtDaily.org. Retrieved 31 July 2009.
    61. ↑ "The Baltic Way – Human Chain Linking Three States in Their Drive for Freedom". UNESCO Memory of the World Programme. 2021-07-21. Retrieved 2009-12-14.

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact</span> 1939 neutrality pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union

    The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, officially the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and also known as the Hitler–Stalin Pact and the Nazi–Soviet Pact, was a non-aggression pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, with a secret protocol establishing Soviet and German spheres of influence across Eastern Europe. The pact was signed in Moscow on 24 August 1939 by Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov and German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Singing Revolution</span> Baltic independence movements (1987–1991)

    The Singing Revolution was a series of events from 1987 to 1991 that led to the restoration of independence of the three Soviet-occupied Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania at the end of the Cold War. The term was coined by an Estonian activist and artist, Heinz Valk, in an article published a week after the 10–11 June 1988 spontaneous mass evening singing demonstrations at the Tallinn Song Festival Grounds.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Occupation of the Baltic states</span>

    The occupation of the Baltic states was a period of annexation of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania by the Soviet Union from 1940 until its dissolution in 1991. For a brief period, Nazi Germany occupied the Baltic states after it invaded the Soviet Union in 1941.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sąjūdis</span> Political party in Lithuania

    The Sąjūdis, initially known as the Reform Movement of Lithuania, is a political organisation which led the struggle for Lithuanian independence in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It was established on 3 June 1988 as the first opposition party in Soviet Lithuania, and was led by Vytautas Landsbergis. Its goal was to seek the return of independent status for Lithuania.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Act of the Re-Establishment of the State of Lithuania</span> 1990 declaration of independence from the Soviet Union by Lithuania

    The Act of the Re-Establishment of the State of Lithuania or Act of 11 March was an independence declaration by Lithuania adopted on 11 March 1990, signed by all members of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania led by Sąjūdis. The act emphasized restoration and legal continuity of the interwar-period Lithuania, which was occupied by the Soviet Union and annexed in June 1940. In March 1990, it was the first of the 15 Soviet republics to declare independence, with the rest following to continue for 21 months, concluding with Kazakhstan's independence in 1991. These events led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">State continuity of the Baltic states</span> Legal continuity of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania

    The three Baltic countries, or the Baltic states – Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania – are held to have continued as independent states under international law while under Soviet occupation from 1940 to 1991, as well as during the German occupation in 1941–1944/1945. The prevailing opinion accepts the Baltic thesis that the Soviet occupation was illegal, and all actions of the Soviet Union related to the occupation are regarded as contrary to international law in general and to the bilateral treaties between the USSR and the three Baltic countries in particular.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940</span>

    The Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940 refers to the military occupation of the Republic of Latvia by the Soviet Union under the provisions of the 1939 Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact with Nazi Germany and its Secret Additional Protocol signed in August 1939.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">German–Soviet Boundary and Friendship Treaty</span> 1939 secret addition to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact

    The German–Soviet Boundary and Friendship Treaty was a second supplementary protocol of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact of 23 August 1939. It was a secret clause as amended on 28 September 1939 by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union after their joint invasion and occupation of sovereign Poland. It was signed by Joachim von Ribbentrop and Vyacheslav Molotov, the foreign ministers of Germany and the Soviet Union respectively, in the presence of Joseph Stalin. Only a small portion of the protocol, which superseded the first treaty, was publicly announced, while the spheres of influence of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union remained secret. The third secret protocol of the Pact was signed on 10 January 1941 by Friedrich Werner von Schulenburg and Molotov, in which Germany renounced its claims on a part of Lithuania, west of the Šešupė river. Only a few months after this, Germany started its invasion of the Soviet Union.

    The Select Committee to Investigate Communist Aggression and the Forced Incorporation of the Baltic States into the U.S.S.R., also known as the Kersten Committee after its chairman, U.S. Representative Charles J. Kersten was established in 1953 to investigate the annexation of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the Soviet Union. The committee terminated March 4, 1954, when it was replaced by the Select Committee on Communist Aggression.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet–Lithuanian Mutual Assistance Treaty</span> 1939 treaty allowing Soviet troops and military bases within Lithuania

    The Soviet–Lithuanian Mutual Assistance Treaty was a bilateral treaty signed between the Soviet Union and Lithuania on October 10, 1939. According to provisions outlined in the treaty, Lithuania would acquire about one fifth of the Vilnius Region, including Lithuania's historical capital, Vilnius, and in exchange would allow five Soviet military bases with 20,000 troops to be established across Lithuania. In essence the treaty with Lithuania was very similar to the treaties that the Soviet Union signed with Estonia on September 28, and with Latvia on October 5. According to official Soviet sources, the Soviet military was strengthening the defenses of a weak nation against possible attacks by Nazi Germany. The treaty provided that Lithuania's sovereignty would not be affected. However, in reality the treaty opened the door for the first Soviet occupation of Lithuania and was described by The New York Times as "virtual sacrifice of independence."

    The Baltics Are Waking Up! is a trilingual song composed by Boriss Rezņiks for the occasion of the Baltic Way, a large demonstration against the Soviet Union for independence of the Baltic States in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. The song is sometimes regarded as the joint anthem of the Baltics. The Lithuanian text was sung by Žilvinas Bubelis, Latvian by Viktors Zemgals, and Estonian by Tarmo Pihlap.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Baltic–Soviet relations</span> International relations between Baltic states and Soviet Union

    Relevant events began regarding the Baltic states and the Soviet Union when, following Bolshevist Russia's conflict with the Baltic states—Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia—several peace treaties were signed with Russia and its successor, the Soviet Union. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, the Soviet Union and all three Baltic States further signed non-aggression treaties. The Soviet Union also confirmed that it would adhere to the Kellogg–Briand Pact with regard to its neighbors, including Estonia and Latvia, and entered into a convention defining "aggression" that included all three Baltic countries.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet ultimatum to Lithuania</span> 1940 demand of the Soviet Union

    The Soviet Union issued an ultimatum to Lithuania before midnight of June 14, 1940. The Soviets, using a formal pretext, demanded that an unspecified number of Soviet soldiers be allowed to enter the Lithuanian territory and that a new pro-Soviet government be formed. The ultimatum and subsequent incorporation of Lithuania into the Soviet Union stemmed from the division of Eastern Europe into the German and Soviet spheres of influence agreed in the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939. Lithuania, along with Latvia and Estonia, fell into the Soviet sphere. According to the Soviet–Lithuanian Mutual Assistance Treaty of October 1939, Lithuania agreed to allow some 20,000 Soviets troops to be stationed at bases within Lithuania in exchange for receiving a portion of the Vilnius Region. Further Soviet actions to establish its dominance in its sphere of influence were delayed by the Winter War with Finland and resumed in spring 1940 when Germany was making rapid advances in western Europe. Despite the threat to the country's independence, Lithuanian authorities did little to plan for contingencies and were unprepared for the ultimatum.

    The Baltic Appeal was a public letter to the secretary-general of the United Nations, Soviet Union, East and West Germany, and signatories of the Atlantic Charter by 45 Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian citizens. Sent on 23 August 1979, the 40th anniversary of the Molotov–Ribbentrop pact, the appeal demanded public disclosure of the pact and its secret protocols, annulment of the pact ab initio, and restoration of the independence of the Baltic states, then occupied by the Soviet Union.

    The People's Government of Lithuania was a puppet cabinet installed by the Soviet Union in Lithuania immediately after Lithuania's acceptance of the Soviet ultimatum of June 14, 1940. The formation of the cabinet was supervised by Vladimir Dekanozov, deputy of Vyacheslav Molotov and a close associate of Lavrentiy Beria, who selected Justas Paleckis as the prime minister and acting president. The government was formed on June 17 and, together with the People's Seimas (parliament), transitioned independent Lithuania to a socialist republic and the 14th republic of the Soviet Union thus legitimizing the Soviet occupation of Lithuania. The People's Government was replaced by the Council of People's Commissars of the Lithuanian SSR on August 25. Similar transitional People's Governments were formed in Latvia and Estonia.

    The Lithuanian Liberty League or LLL was a dissident organization in the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic and a political party in independent Republic of Lithuania. Established as an underground resistance group in 1978, LLL was headed by Antanas Terleckas. Pro-independence LLL published anti-Soviet literature and organized protest rallies. While it enjoyed limited popularity in 1987–1989, it grew increasingly irrelevant after the independence declaration in 1990. It registered as a political party in November 1995 and participated in parliamentary elections without gaining any seats in the Seimas.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Black Ribbon Day</span> International day of remembrance

    The Black Ribbon Day, officially known in the European Union as the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism and also referred to as the Europe-wide Day of Remembrance for the victims of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, is an international day of remembrance for victims of totalitarianism regimes, specifically Stalinist, communist, Nazi and fascist regimes. Formally recognised by the European Union, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and some other countries, it is observed on 23 August. It symbolises the rejection of "extremism, intolerance and oppression" according to the European Union. The purpose of the Day of Remembrance is to preserve the memory of the victims of mass deportations and exterminations, while promoting democratic values to reinforce peace and stability in Europe. It is one of the two official remembrance days or observances of the European Union, alongside Europe Day. Under the name Black Ribbon Day it is an official remembrance day of Canada. The European Union has used both names alongside each other.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Background of the occupation of the Baltic states</span>

    The background of the occupation of the Baltic states covers the period before the first Soviet occupation on 14 June 1940, stretching from independence in 1918 to the Soviet ultimatums in 1939–1940. Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia gained independence in the aftermath of the Russian revolutions of 1917 and the German occupation which in the Baltic countries lasted until the end of World War I in November 1918. All three countries signed non-aggression treaties with the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s. Despite the treaties, in the aftermath of the 1939 German–Soviet pact, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were occupied, and thereafter forcibly incorporated into the Soviet Union, in 1940.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Baltic states under Soviet rule (1944–1991)</span> Historical event

    The three Baltic states – Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – were re-occupied in 1944–1945 by the Soviet Union (USSR) following the German occupation. The Baltic states regained independence in 1990–1991.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet economic blockade of Lithuania</span> 1990 geopolitical event

    The Soviet economic blockade of Lithuania was imposed by the Soviet Union on Lithuania between 18 April and 2 July 1990.

    References

    This page is based on this Wikipedia article
    Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
    Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.