Lithuania and the euro

Last updated
Eurozone participation
.mw-parser-output .glossary dt{margin-top:0.4em}.mw-parser-output .glossary dt+dt{margin-top:-0.2em}.mw-parser-output .glossary .templatequote{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:-0.5em}
European Union member states
(special territories not shown)
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
20 in the eurozone
1 in ERM II, without an opt-out (Bulgaria)
1 in ERM II, with an opt-out (Denmark)
5 not in ERM II, but obliged to join the eurozone on meeting the convergence criteria (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Sweden)
Non-EU member states
4 using the euro with a monetary agreement (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City)
2 using the euro unilaterally (Kosovo and Montenegro)
.mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" * ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "}
.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}}@media print{.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:none!important}}
v
t
e Eurozone participation.svg
Eurozone participation
European Union member states
(special territories not shown)
  20 in the eurozone
  1 in ERM II, without an opt-out (Bulgaria)
  1 in ERM II, with an opt-out (Denmark)
  5 not in ERM II, but obliged to join the eurozone on meeting the convergence criteria (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Sweden)
Non–EU member states
  4 using the euro with a monetary agreement (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City)
  2 using the euro unilaterally (Kosovo and Montenegro)

Lithuanian euro starter kit Lithuanian euro starter kit 2.jpg
Lithuanian euro starter kit

Lithuania, as an EU member state, joined the eurozone by adopting the euro on 1 January 2015. [1] This made it the last of the three Baltic states to adopt the euro, after Estonia (2011) and Latvia (2014). Before then, its currency, the litas, was pegged to the euro at 3.4528 litas to 1 euro.

Contents

History

All members of the European Union, except Denmark, are required by treaty to join the eurozone once certain economic criteria have been met. The Lithuanian litas participated in ERM II since 28 June 2004, and was pegged to the euro at a rate of 3.45280 litai = €1. Lithuania originally set 1 January 2007 as its target date for adopting the euro, and in March 2006 requested that the European Commission and the European Central Bank conduct an assessment on their readiness to adopt the currency. The Commission's report found that while Lithuania met four of the five criteria, their average annual inflation was 2.7%, exceeding the limit of 2.6%. As a result, the Commission concluded that "there should be no change at present to Lithuania's status as a Member State with a derogation." [2] [3] Lithuania is the only country initially denied approval to adopt the euro after requesting a convergence check. [4]

In December 2006, the government approved a new convergence plan, which pushed the expected adoption date to post-2010 due to inflation. [5] In 2007, Prime Minister Gediminas Kirkilas stated that he hoped for adoption around 2010–11. [6] [7] Generally high inflation, which reached a peak of 12.7% in June 2008 [8] (well above the 4.2% limit of the time), [9] delayed Lithuania's adoption of the euro. By the time of the 2010 European debt crisis, the expected switch-over date had been put back further, to 2014. [10] Lithuania expressed interest in a suggestion from the IMF that countries which are not able to meet the Maastricht criteria be able to "partially adopt" the euro, using the currency but not getting a seat at the European Central Bank. [11] Interviews with the Foreign Minister and Prime Minister in May and August 2012 respectively highlighted that Lithuania still aimed to adopt the euro, but would not set a target date until the state of the eurozone post-crisis was clear. [12] [13]

During the 2012 Lithuanian parliamentary election campaign, the Social Democrats were reported to prefer delaying the euro adoption, from the previous 2014 target until 1 January 2015. [14] When the second round of the elections were concluded in October, the Social Democrats, the Labour Party and the Order and Justice won a majority and formed the new government, and the coalition parties were expected to accept the proposed delay in adoption of the euro. [15]

When Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevičius presented his new government in December, eurozone accession as soon as possible was mentioned as one of the key priorities for the government. The Prime Minister said: "January 2015 is a feasible date. But things can also turn out, that we may try to adopt the euro together with Latvia in January 2014. Let the first quarter (of 2013) pass, and we'll give it a thought." [16] However, in January 2013, the Prime Minister announced that the government and the Bank of Lithuania had agreed on a target date of 2015. [17] In February 2013, the government of Lithuania approved a plan for euro adoption in 2015. [18] Publicly, Butkevičius and Loreta Graužinienė (then Speaker of the Seimas) reaffirmed by mid-January 2014 the need for euro adoption in 2015. [19]

According to figures from the Bank of Lithuania, Lithuania had met 4 out of the 5 criteria by October 2013, the exception being the government deficit of 3.2% of GDP, exceeding the limit of 3.0%. [20] The Lithuanian government expected this to decline to 2.9% by the first quarter of 2014. [4] [20] In April 2014, the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs gave their preliminary consent for Lithuania to join the eurozone on 1 January 2015, having concluded that the country was complying with all the criteria according to economic data from the first months of 2014. [21] Lithuania's parliament approved a euro changeover law in April 2014, [22] and in their biennial reports released on 4 June the European Commission found that the country satisfied the convergence criteria. The European Central Bank did not reach a conclusion on whether the country was ready to join the euro area. [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] On 16 July, the European Parliament voted in favour of Lithuania adopting the euro. [28] [29] On 23 July, the EU Council of Ministers approved the decision, clearing the way for Lithuania to adopt the euro on 1 January 2015. [1] [30]

Convergence criteria
Assessment monthCountry HICP inflation rate [31] [nb 1] Excessive deficit procedure [32] Exchange rateLong-term interest rate [33] [nb 2] Compatibility of legislation
Budget deficit to GDP [34] Debt-to-GDP ratio [35] ERM II member [36] Change in rate [37] [38] [nb 3]
2012 ECB Report [nb 4] Reference valuesMax. 3.1% [nb 5]
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
None open(as of 31 March 2012)Min. 2 years
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
Max. ±15% [nb 6]
(for 2011)
Max. 5.80% [nb 7]
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
Yes [39] [40]
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
Max. 3.0%
(Fiscal year 2011) [41]
Max. 60%
(Fiscal year 2011) [41]
Flag of Lithuania.svg Lithuania 4.2%Open7 years, 10 months0.0%5.19%No
5.5%38.5%
2013 ECB Report [nb 8] Reference valuesMax. 2.7% [nb 9]
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
None open(as of 30 Apr 2013)Min. 2 years
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
Max. ±15% [nb 6]
(for 2012)
Max. 5.5% [nb 9]
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
Yes [42] [43]
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
Max. 3.0%
(Fiscal year 2012) [44]
Max. 60%
(Fiscal year 2012) [44]
Flag of Lithuania.svg Lithuania 2.7%Open(Closed in June 2013)8 years, 10 months0.0%4.42%Un­known
3.2%40.7%
2014 ECB Report [nb 10] Reference valuesMax. 1.7% [nb 11]
(as of 30 Apr 2014)
None open(as of 30 Apr 2014)Min. 2 years
(as of 30 Apr 2014)
Max. ±15% [nb 6]
(for 2013)
Max. 6.2% [nb 12]
(as of 30 Apr 2014)
Yes [45] [46]
(as of 30 Apr 2014)
Max. 3.0%
(Fiscal year 2013) [47]
Max. 60%
(Fiscal year 2013) [47]
Flag of Lithuania.svg Lithuania 0.6%None9 years, 10 months0.0%3.60%Yes
2.1%39.4%
  Criterion fulfilled
  Criterion potentially fulfilled: If the budget deficit exceeds the 3% limit, but is "close" to this value (the European Commission has deemed 3.5% to be close by in the past), [48] then the criteria can still potentially be fulfilled if either the deficits in the previous two years are significantly declining towards the 3% limit, or if the excessive deficit is the result of exceptional circumstances which are temporary in nature (i.e. one-off expenditures triggered by a significant economic downturn, or by the implementation of economic reforms that are expected to deliver a significant positive impact on the government's future fiscal budgets). However, even if such "special circumstances" are found to exist, additional criteria must also be met to comply with the fiscal budget criterion. [49] [50] Additionally, if the debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds 60% but is "sufficiently diminishing and approaching the reference value at a satisfactory pace" it can be deemed to be in compliance. [50]
  Criterion not fulfilled
Notes
  1. The rate of increase of the 12-month average HICP over the prior 12-month average must be no more than 1.5% larger than the unweighted arithmetic average of the similar HICP inflation rates in the 3 EU member states with the lowest HICP inflation. If any of these 3 states have a HICP rate significantly below the similarly averaged HICP rate for the eurozone (which according to ECB practice means more than 2% below), and if this low HICP rate has been primarily caused by exceptional circumstances (i.e. severe wage cuts or a strong recession), then such a state is not included in the calculation of the reference value and is replaced by the EU state with the fourth lowest HICP rate.
  2. The arithmetic average of the annual yield of 10-year government bonds as of the end of the past 12 months must be no more than 2.0% larger than the unweighted arithmetic average of the bond yields in the 3 EU member states with the lowest HICP inflation. If any of these states have bond yields which are significantly larger than the similarly averaged yield for the eurozone (which according to previous ECB reports means more than 2% above) and at the same time does not have complete funding access to financial markets (which is the case for as long as a government receives bailout funds), then such a state is not to be included in the calculation of the reference value.
  3. The change in the annual average exchange rate against the euro.
  4. Reference values from the ECB convergence report of May 2012. [39]
  5. Sweden, Ireland and Slovenia were the reference states. [39]
  6. 1 2 3 The maximum allowed change in rate is ± 2.25% for Denmark.
  7. Sweden and Slovenia were the reference states, with Ireland excluded as an outlier. [39]
  8. Reference values from the ECB convergence report of June 2013. [42]
  9. 1 2 Sweden, Latvia and Ireland were the reference states. [42]
  10. Reference values from the ECB convergence report of June 2014. [45]
  11. Latvia, Portugal and Ireland were the reference states, with Greece, Bulgaria and Cyprus excluded as outliers. [45]
  12. Latvia, Ireland and Portugal were the reference states. [45]

Public opinion

A poll by Eurobarometer in April 2013 found that 41% of Lithuanians supported switching to the euro, while 55% were opposed. This was a decrease in support of 3% from a year earlier. [4] [51] A September 2014 Eurobarometer poll found that 49% of Lithuanians were opposed to the introduction of the euro and 47% supported it. [52]

Opinion polling in the run-up to the adoption of the euro produced a mixed set of results. [53] A Baltic Surveys (Baltijos Tyrimai) face-to-face interview survey for the eurosceptic Europeans United for Democracy party conducted on 14–24 November found that 49% of Lithuanians disagree with their Government's decision to introduce the euro, while 26% of Lithuanians approved (5% fully, 21% rather in favour). 57% of respondents said the Government acted wrongly by introducing the euro without a referendum on the issue. [54] However, a poll conducted by Berent Research Baltic for the Bank of Lithuania between 3 and 26 November showed that 53% of the population were in favour of the new currency while 39% were sceptical. [53]

Coin design

The designs of the Lithuanian coins share a similar national side for all denominations, featuring the Vytis symbol and the name of the country, "Lietuva". [55] The design was announced on 11 November 2004 following a public opinion poll conducted by the Bank of Lithuania. [55] It was created by the sculptor Antanas Žukauskas. [56] The only difference between the coins is that the one and two euro coins have vertical lines on the outer circle, the fifty, twenty and ten cent coins have horizontal lines on the outer circle, and the five, two and one cent coins have no lines on the outer circle. [55] In January 2014 it was announced that all coins will have "2015" minted on them to display the year of Lithuania's euro adoption. The Lithuanian Mint was chosen to produce the coins. [55] [56]

Depiction of Lithuanian euro coinage | Obverse side
€0.01€0.02€0.05
N22978 5+2+1 cnt Lietuva 2015.jpg N22978 5+2+1 cnt Lietuva 2015.jpg N22978 5+2+1 cnt Lietuva 2015.jpg
"Vytis" from the Coat of arms of Lithuania
€0.10€0.20€0.50
N22978 10 cnt Lietuva 2015 (1).jpg N22978 20 cnt Lietuva 2015.jpg N22978 50 cnt Lietuva 2015.jpg
"Vytis" from the Coat of arms of Lithuania
€1.00€2.00€2 Coin Edge
N22978 1 eur Lietuva 2015.jpg N22978 2 eur aversas.jpg 2 euro edge inscription Lithuania.svg "LAISVĖ, VIENYBĖ, GEROVĖ"
"Freedom, Unity, Prosperity" in Lithuanian
"Vytis" from the Coat of arms of Lithuania

For the design of images on the common side and a detailed description of the coins, see euro coins.

Lithuanian Ethnographical Regions series

Including Samogitia, Aukštaitija, Dzūkija, Suvalkija and Lithuania Minor

YearNumberDesign
20191 Samogitia's coat of arms
20202 Aukštaitija's coat of arms
20213 Dzūkija's coat of arms
20224 Suvalkija's coat of arms
TBA5 Lithuania Minor's coat of arms

Accession to the eurozone

Lithuania officially joined the eurozone at midnight on the morning of 1 January 2015, with the Lithuanian Central Bank offering an exchange rate of 3.4528 LTL to one euro. [57] Immediately after the start of the New Year, Prime Minister Butkevicius made the country's first cash withdrawal in euros. [58] It was reported that nearly all of the nation's cash machines would be dispensing euros within 30 minutes of the New Year. In Brussels, the European Commission building was draped with a banner welcoming Lithuania to the eurozone. [59]

Euro adoption day [60] Changeover plan [60] Introduction [60] [61] Frontloading [60] Dual circulation
period [60]
Exchange of LTL cash period [60] Dual price display [60] Mint company [60] Currency circulated
(in units) [60]
1 January 2015A changeover law was passed in April 2014 [22] Big-BangCommercial banks starts receiving euro banknotes and coins respectively 2 and 3 months before €-day.
Retailers receive coins and banknotes during the last month before €-day.
15 daysBanks:
12 months (notes)
6 months (coins)
Central bank:
indefinitely
Start 30 days after Council approval of euro adoption, equal to 22 Aug.2014, and lasts until 6 or 12 months after adoption Lithuanian Mint [55] 132 million banknotes, 370 million coins [62]

The European Commission recommended in November 2014 that Lithuania extend the legally required dual price display period by six additional months, so that it would last until 31 December 2015. [60] Lithuania did not adopt the recommendation and the required dual price display ended on 1 July 2015. [63]

Rotation of voting rights in the ECB Governing Council

On 17 June 2014 the Deutsche Bundesbank released a statement stating that "Lithuania could cause the ECB Governing Council's voting rights to rotate. The virtually certain introduction of the euro in this small Baltic nation at the beginning of next year would cause the number of national central bank (NCB) governors on the ECB Governing Council to exceed 18 for the first time. It would trigger a changed voting procedure designed to ensure that decisions can still be taken effectively in a growing Eurosystem. This would pave the way for the introduction of a modified voting system similar to that of the US Federal Reserve System." [64]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euro</span> Currency of the European Union

The euro is the official currency of 20 of the 27 member states of the European Union. This group of states is officially known as the euro area or, more commonly, the eurozone. The euro is divided into 100 euro cents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eurozone</span> Area in which the euro is the official currency

The euro area, commonly called the eurozone (EZ), is a currency union of 20 member states of the European Union (EU) that have adopted the euro (€) as their primary currency and sole legal tender, and have thus fully implemented EMU policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Exchange Rate Mechanism</span> European system to reduce exchange rate variability after the Euro

The European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM II) is a system introduced by the European Economic Community on 1 January 1999 alongside the introduction of a single currency, the euro as part of the European Monetary System (EMS), to reduce exchange rate variability and achieve monetary stability in Europe.

The euro convergence criteria are the criteria European Union member states are required to meet to enter the third stage of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and adopt the euro as their currency. The four main criteria, which actually comprise five criteria as the "fiscal criterion" consists of both a "debt criterion" and a "deficit criterion", are based on Article 140 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) is an indicator of inflation and price stability for the European Central Bank (ECB). It is a consumer price index which is compiled according to a methodology that has been harmonised across EU countries. The euro area HICP is a weighted average of price indices of member states who have adopted the euro. The primary goal of the ECB is to maintain price stability, defined as keeping the year on year increase HICP target on 2% over the medium term. In order to do that, the ECB can control the short-term interest rate through Eonia, the European overnight index average, which affects market expectations. The HICP is also used to assess the convergence criteria on inflation which countries must fulfill in order to adopt the euro. In the United Kingdom, the HICP is called the CPI and is used to set the inflation target of the Bank of England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Czech Republic and the euro</span>

The Czech Republic is bound to adopt the euro in the future and to join the eurozone once it has satisfied the euro convergence criteria by the Treaty of Accession since it joined the European Union (EU) in 2004. The Czech Republic is therefore a candidate for the enlargement of the eurozone and it uses the Czech koruna as its currency, regulated by the Czech National Bank, a member of the European System of Central Banks, and does not participate in European Exchange Rate Mechanism II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hungary and the euro</span> Plans since 2003 to replace the Hungarian forint with the euro

While the Hungarian government has been planning since 2003 to replace the Hungarian forint with the euro, as of 2023, there is no target date and the forint is not part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. An economic study in 2008 found that the adoption of the euro would increase foreign investment in Hungary by 30%, although current governor of the Hungarian National Bank and former Minister of the National Economy György Matolcsy said they did not want to give up the country's independence regarding corporate tax matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latvia and the euro</span>

Latvia replaced its previous currency, the lats, with the euro on 1 January 2014, after a European Union (EU) assessment in June 2013 asserted that the country had met all convergence criteria necessary for euro adoption. The adoption process began 1 May 2004, when Latvia joined the European Union, entering the EU's Economic and Monetary Union. At the start of 2005, the lats was pegged to the euro at Ls 0.702804 = €1, and Latvia joined the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, four months later on 2 May 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poland and the euro</span> Issues surrounding Poland and the Euro

Poland does not use the euro as its currency. However, under the terms of their Treaty of Accession with the European Union, all new Member States "shall participate in the Economic and Monetary Union from the date of accession as a Member State with a derogation", which means that Poland is obliged to eventually replace its currency, the złoty, with the euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bulgaria and the euro</span> Process of Bulgaria adopting the Euro

Bulgaria plans to adopt the euro and become the 21st member state of the eurozone. The Bulgarian lev has been on a currency board since 1997, with a fixed exchange rate initially against the Deutsche Mark and subsequently its replacement the euro. Bulgaria's target date for introduction of the euro was 1 January 2025. However, the 2024 ECB convergence report concluded that Bulgaria did not meet the convergence criteria due to high inflation, so this timeline has been delayed. The Bulgarian National Bank and several Bulgarian politicians have expressed their desire to join as soon as possible, and project that inflation will be low enough by the end of 2024. If Bulgaria adopts the euro, it will become the second national currency of the country after the lev, which was introduced over 140 years ago. The fixed exchange rate is 1.95583 lev for 1 euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romania and the euro</span> Overview of the relationship between Romania and the Euro

Romania's national currency is the leu. After Romania joined the European Union (EU) in 2007, the country became required to replace the leu with the euro once it meets all four euro convergence criteria, as stated in article 140 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. As of 2023, the only currency on the market is the leu and the euro is not yet used in shops. The Romanian leu is not part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, although Romanian authorities are working to prepare the changeover to the euro. To achieve the currency changeover, Romania must undergo at least two years of stability within the limits of the convergence criteria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sweden and the euro</span> Overview of the relationship between Sweden and the euro

Sweden does not currently use the euro as its currency and has no plans to replace the existing Swedish krona in the near future. Sweden's Treaty of Accession of 1994 made it subject to the Treaty of Maastricht, which obliges states to join the eurozone once they meet the necessary conditions. Sweden maintains that joining the European Exchange Rate Mechanism II, participation in which for at least two years is a requirement for euro adoption, is voluntary, and has chosen to remain outside pending public approval by a referendum, thereby intentionally avoiding the fulfilment of the adoption requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the euro</span> Overview of the history of the euro

The euro came into existence on 1 January 1999, although it had been a goal of the European Union (EU) and its predecessors since the 1960s. After tough negotiations, the Maastricht Treaty entered into force in 1993 with the goal of creating an economic and monetary union (EMU) by 1999 for all EU states except the UK and Denmark.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom and the euro</span>

The United Kingdom did not seek to adopt the euro as its official currency for the duration of its membership of the European Union (EU), and secured an opt-out at the euro's creation via the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, wherein the Bank of England would only be a member of the European System of Central Banks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denmark and the euro</span> Overview of the relationship between Denmark and the euro

Denmark uses the krone as its currency and does not use the euro, having negotiated the right to opt out from participation under the Maastricht Treaty of 1992. In 2000, the government held a referendum on introducing the euro, which was defeated with 53.2% voting no and 46.8% voting yes. The Danish krone is part of the ERM II mechanism, so its exchange rate is tied to within 2.25% of the euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montenegro and the euro</span>

Montenegro is a country in Southeast Europe, which is neither a member of the European Union (EU) nor the Eurozone; it does not have a formal monetary agreement with the EU either. However, it is one of the two territories that has unilaterally adopted the euro in 2002 as its de facto domestic currency and legal tender.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Enlargement of the eurozone</span>

The enlargement of the eurozone is an ongoing process within the European Union (EU). All member states of the European Union, except Denmark which negotiated an opt-out from the provisions, are obliged to adopt the euro as their sole currency once they meet the criteria, which include: complying with the debt and deficit criteria outlined by the Stability and Growth Pact, keeping inflation and long-term governmental interest rates below certain reference values, stabilising their currency's exchange rate versus the euro by participating in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, and ensuring that their national laws comply with the ECB statute, ESCB statute and articles 130+131 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The obligation for EU member states to adopt the euro was first outlined by article 109.1j of the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, which became binding on all new member states by the terms of their treaties of accession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European debt crisis</span> Multi-year debt crisis in multiple EU countries since late 2009

The European debt crisis, often also referred to as the eurozone crisis or the European sovereign debt crisis, was a multi-year debt crisis that took place in the European Union (EU) from 2009 until the mid to late 2010s. Several eurozone member states were unable to repay or refinance their government debt or to bail out over-indebted banks under their national supervision without the assistance of third parties like other eurozone countries, the European Central Bank (ECB), or the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union</span> Economic union and policies

The economic and monetary union (EMU) of the European Union is a group of policies aimed at converging the economies of member states of the European Union at three stages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Croatia and the euro</span>

Croatia adopted the euro as its currency on 1 January 2023, becoming the 20th member state of the eurozone. A fixed conversion rate was set at 1 € = 7.5345 kn.

References

  1. 1 2 "Lithuania to adopt the euro on 1 January 2015". Council of the European Union. 23 July 2014. Retrieved 23 July 2014.
  2. "Commission assesses the state of convergence in Lithuania". European Commission. 16 May 2006. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  3. "Euro zone: Slovenia in, Lithuania on hold". 16 May 2006. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  4. 1 2 3 Milne, Richard; Spiegel, Peter (30 December 2013). "Lithuania shows rare enthusiasm for eurozone membership" . Financial Times. Archived from the original on 11 December 2022. Retrieved 12 January 2014.(subscription required)
  5. "Adoption of the euro in Lithuania". Bank of Lithuania. Archived from the original on 26 January 2006. Retrieved 11 January 2007.
  6. "Lithuanian PM says aiming for euro by 2010–2011". Forbes. 12 April 2007. Archived from the original on 9 January 2008. Retrieved 3 January 2008.
  7. Pavilenene, Danuta (8 December 2008). "SEB: no euro for Lithuania before 2013". The Baltic Course. Retrieved 21 December 2008.
  8. "Inflation and the euro". Eurostat & EuroGeographics for the Administrative Boundaries. European Central Bank. 8 July 2021.
  9. "SEB: no euro for Lithuania before 2013". The Baltic Course. Retrieved 22 December 2008.
  10. "FEATURE – Crisis, not Greece, makes euro hopefuls cautious". Reuters. 18 January 2010. Archived from the original on 1 February 2013.
  11. "Lithuanian PM keen on fast-track euro idea". The Baltic Course. 8 April 2009.
  12. "Lithuania to Adopt Euro When Europe Is Ready, Kubilius Says". Bloomberg . Retrieved 7 September 2013.
  13. "Foreign Minister: 'Lithuania could adopt the euro after some time'". EurActiv. 23 May 2012.
  14. Sytas, Andrius; Lowe, Christian (14 October 2012). "Lithuanian voters to give harsh verdict on austerity". reuters. Retrieved 7 September 2013.[ dead link ]
  15. Lannin, Patrick (29 October 2012). "Lithuania PM candidate targets 2015 euro adoption". Reuters. Thomson Reuters.
  16. "Lithuania's next prime minister still hopes to adopt euro in 2014". 15min.lt. UAB "15min". 11 December 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2012.
  17. Bradley, Bryan (25 January 2013). "Lithuania Commits to Seek Euro Adoption in 2015". Bloomberg . Retrieved 25 January 2013.
  18. "Lithuanian government endorses euro introduction plan". 15 min. 25 February 2013. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  19. "A. Butkevičius: Su L. Graužiniene sutarta dėl euro". 16 January 2014.
  20. 1 2 "Euro adoption criteria and their implementation". Bank of Lithuania . Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  21. Bankas, Lietuvos (8 April 2014). "The European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs preliminary approved of the euro adoption in Lithuania" . Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  22. 1 2 "Lithuania readies for euro adoption". baltictimes.com . 1 May 2014. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  23. "Commission assesses eight EU countries' readiness to join the euro area; proposes that Lithuania join in 2015". European Commission. 4 June 2014. Retrieved 4 June 2014.
  24. "ECB publishes its Convergence Report 2014". European Central Bank. 4 June 2014. Retrieved 4 June 2014.
  25. "Convergence Report" (PDF). European Economy. European Commission. 2014. ISSN   1725-3217 . Retrieved 4 June 2014.
  26. "Convergence Report" (PDF). European Central Bank. June 2014. Retrieved 4 June 2014.
  27. "Lithuania 'ready to join euro' in 2015 - EU Commission". BBC News. 4 June 2014. Retrieved 10 July 2023.
  28. "European Parliament gives go-ahead for Lithuania to join the euro". European Parliament. 16 July 2014. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
  29. ELTA, BNS. "European Parliament greenlights Lithuania's euro adoption". delfi.lt. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  30. "Lietuvoje keičiama valiuta" (in Lithuanian). Delphi. 23 July 2014.
  31. "HICP (2005=100): Monthly data (12-month average rate of annual change)". Eurostat. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  32. "The corrective arm/ Excessive Deficit Procedure". European Commission . Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  33. "Long-term interest rate statistics for EU Member States (monthly data for the average of the past year)". Eurostat. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  34. "Government deficit/surplus, debt and associated data". Eurostat. 22 April 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
  35. "General government debt". Eurostat. Retrieved 2 June 2018.
  36. "ERM II – the EU's Exchange Rate Mechanism". European Commission. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  37. "Euro/ECU exchange rates - annual data". Eurostat. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  38. "Former euro area national currencies vs. euro/ECU - annual data". Eurostat. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  39. 1 2 3 4 "Convergence Report May 2012" (PDF). European Central Bank. May 2012. Retrieved 20 January 2013.
  40. "Convergence Report - 2012" (PDF). European Commission. March 2012. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
  41. 1 2 "European economic forecast - spring 2012" (PDF). European Commission. 1 May 2012. Retrieved 1 September 2012.
  42. 1 2 3 "Convergence Report" (PDF). European Central Bank. June 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
  43. "Convergence Report - 2013" (PDF). European Commission. March 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
  44. 1 2 "European economic forecast - spring 2013" (PDF). European Commission. February 2013. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
  45. 1 2 3 4 "Convergence Report" (PDF). European Central Bank. June 2014. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
  46. "Convergence Report - 2014" (PDF). European Commission. April 2014. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
  47. 1 2 "European economic forecast - spring 2014" (PDF). European Commission. March 2014. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
  48. "Luxembourg Report prepared in accordance with Article 126(3) of the Treaty" (PDF). European Commission. 12 May 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  49. "EMI Annual Report 1994" (PDF). European Monetary Institute (EMI). April 1995. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  50. 1 2 "Progress towards convergence - November 1995 (report prepared in accordance with article 7 of the EMI statute)" (PDF). European Monetary Institute (EMI). November 1995. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  51. "Introduction of the euro in the more recently acceded member states" (PDF). Eurobarometer. April 2013. p. 66. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
  52. European Commission. Directorate General for Economic Financial Affairs; TNS Political & Social (September 2014), Flash Eurobarometer 402 survey on "Introduction of the Euro in Lithuania" (PDF), European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs and co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication, doi:10.2765/88982, ISBN   978-92-79-39786-8
  53. 1 2 baltic News Service (15 December 2014). "Conflicting poll results on Lithuanians' enthusiasm for euro". Delfi . Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  54. Survey of Lithuanian Population on Introduction of Euro (PDF), Europeans United for Democracy, November 2014
  55. 1 2 3 4 5 "Projects for Lithuanian euro coins already bear the year 2015". Bank of Lithuania. 31 January 2014. Archived from the original on 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  56. 1 2 "Euro Banknotes and Coins" . Retrieved 12 January 2014.
  57. "Lithuania joins euro zone on January 1, 2015". Sofia Globe. 1 January 2015.
  58. "Lithuania joins eurozone as its 19th member". Xinhuanet. 1 January 2015. Archived from the original on 1 January 2015.
  59. Beniusis, Vaidotas (1 January 2015). "Lithuania joins eurozone to seal ties with West". Yahoo News.
  60. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "Fifteenth Report on the practical preparations for the future enlargement of the euro area" (PDF). European Commission. 21 November 2014.
  61. "Scenarios for adopting the euro". European Commission. Retrieved 7 September 2013.
  62. "The first Lithuanian euro coins are being minted by order of the Bank of Lithuania". Lietuvos Bankas. 16 June 2014. Archived from the original on 20 August 2014.
  63. "Etiketėse – kainos bus tik eurais" (in Lithuanian). Lietuvos rytas. 8 June 2015. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  64. "How voting rights rotate on the ECB Governing Council". Deutsche Bundesbank – Eurosystem. 19 September 2014.