Penn Central Transportation Company

Last updated
Penn Central Transportation Company
PennCentral Logo.svg
Penn Central Transportation Company
Constituent railroads shown in different colors; trackage rights shown in purple.
PC SD45 6133 on Horsesoe Curve near Altoona, PA on September 13, 1970 (24713401701).jpg
Penn Central (PC) SD45 No. 6133 at Horseshoe Curve in Blair County, Pennsylvania, on September 13, 1970, three months after PC filed for bankruptcy
Overview
Headquarters Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.
Reporting mark PC
Locale Connecticut
Delaware
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Missouri
New York
New Jersey
Ohio
Ontario
Pennsylvania
Quebec
Rhode Island
Washington, DC
West Virginia
Dates of operation19681976
Predecessor Pennsylvania Railroad
New York Central System
New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad
Successor Amtrak
Conrail
Technical
Track gauge 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)
Electrification 12.5 kV 25 Hz AC:
New Haven-Washington, D.C./South Amboy;
Philadelphia-Harrisburg
700V DC:
Harlem Line;
Hudson Line
Length20,530 miles (33,040 kilometres)
Other
Website pcrrhs.org

The Penn Central Transportation Company, commonly abbreviated to Penn Central, was an American class I railroad that operated from 1968 to 1976. Penn Central combined three traditional corporate rivals, the Pennsylvania, New York Central and the New York, New Haven and Hartford railroad, each of which were united by large-scale service into the New York metropolitan area and to a lesser extent New England and Chicago. The new company failed barely two years after formation, the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history at the time. Penn Central's railroad assets were nationalized into Conrail along with those of other bankrupt northeastern railroads; its real estate and insurance holdings successfully reorganized into American Premier Underwriters.

Contents

History

"Public Interest Demands Merger", a 1962 publicity booklet produced by the Penn Central Merger Information Committee PCRR Merger P1-2.png
"Public Interest Demands Merger", a 1962 publicity booklet produced by the Penn Central Merger Information Committee

Pre-merger

The Penn Central railroad system developed in response to challenges facing northeastern American railroads during the late 1960s. While railroads elsewhere in North America drew revenues from long-distance shipments of commodities such as coal, lumber, paper and iron ore, railroads in the densely populated northeast traditionally depended on a heterogeneous mix of services, including:

These labor-intensive, short-haul services proved vulnerable to competition from automobiles, buses, and trucks, a threat recently invigorated by the new limited-access highways authorized in the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956. [1] At the same time, contemporary railroad regulation restricted the extent to which U.S. railroads could react to the new market conditions. Changes to passenger fares and freight shipment rates required approval from the capricious Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), as did mergers or abandonment of lines. [2] :164–166 Merger, which eliminated duplicative back office employees, seemed an escape. [2] [ failed verification ]

The situation was particularly acute for the Pennsylvania (PRR) and New York Central (NYC) railroads. Both had extensive physical plants dedicated to their passenger custom. As that revenue stream faded following WWII, neither could slim their assets fast enough to earn a substantial profit (although the NYC came much closer). [2] :215,258

NYC president Alfred E. Perlman (right) confers with PRR chairman Stuart T. Saunders outside the Interstate Commerce Commission Hearing Room in Washington, D.C. about employee job security. NYCRR Headlights Perlman Saunders 196502XX.png
NYC president Alfred E. Perlman (right) confers with PRR chairman Stuart T. Saunders outside the Interstate Commerce Commission Hearing Room in Washington, D.C. about employee job security.

In 1957, the two proposed a merger, despite severe organizational and regulatory hurdles. [2] :215 Neither railroad had much respect for its merger partner; the lines had fought bitterly over New York-Chicago custom and ill-will remained in the executive suites. [2] :248,256 Amongst middle management, the company's corporate cultures all but precluded integration: a team of young, flexible managers had begun reshaping the NYC from a traditional railroad into a multimodal express-freight transporter, while the PRR continued to bet on a railroad revival. [2] :248,258 At a technical level, the two companies served independent markets east of Cleveland (running through their namesake states), but virtually identical trackage west of Cleveland meant any merger would have anticompetitive effect. [2] :215

For decades, merger proposals had tried to balance the competitors instead, joining them with lesser partners end-to-end. The unexpected NYC+PRR proposal required all the northeastern railroads to reconsider their corporate strategy, clouding the waters for the ICC. The resulting negotiations took nearly a decade, and when the PRR and NYC merged, they faced three competitors of comparable size: the Erie had merged with the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western to create the Erie Lackawanna Railway (EL) in 1960, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway (C&O) acquired control of the Baltimore & Ohio (B&O) in 1963, and the Norfolk & Western Railway (N&W) absorbed several railroads, including the Nickel Plate and the Wabash, in 1964. [2] :215

Pennsylvania Railroad.svg
New York Central Herald.png
NYNewHavenHft logo.jpg

Regulators also required the new company to incorporate the bankrupt New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad (NH) and New York, Susquehanna & Western Railway (NYS&W); [4] if neither the N&W and C&O would buy the Lehigh Valley Railroad (LV), then that railroad should be incorporated as well. Ultimately, only the New Haven successfully joined the Penn Central; the conglomerate failed before it could incorporate the latter two. [2] :248 The only railroad leaving the Penn Central was the PRR's controlling interest in the N&W, whose dividends had generated much of the PRR's premerger profitability.

Merger begins

The legal merger (formally, an acquisition of the NYC by the PRR) concluded on February 1, 1968. The Pennsylvania Railroad, the nominal survivor of the merger, changed its name to Pennsylvania New York Central Transportation Company, and soon began using "Penn Central" as a trade name. That trade name became official a month later on May 8, 1968. [2] :248 Saunders later commented: "Because of the many years it took to consummate the merger, the morale of both railroads was badly disrupted and they were faced with unmanageable problems which were insurmountable. In addition to overcoming obstacles, the principal problem was too much governmental regulation and a passenger deficit which amounted to more than $100 million a year." [5]

Almost immediately after the transaction cleared, the organizational headwinds presaged during the merger negotiations began to overwhelm the new corporation's management. [6] :233–234 As ex-PRR managers began to secure the plum jobs, the forward-thinking ex-NYC managers departed for greener pastures. [2] :248 Clashing union contracts prevented the company's left hand from talking to its right, [6] :233–234 and incompatible computer systems meant that PC classification clerks regularly lost track of train movements. [2] [ failed verification ]

The February 1970 PC employee newsletter cover shows a sheet metal worker constructing a new boxcar. PCPost 197002XX.png
The February 1970 PC employee newsletter cover shows a sheet metal worker constructing a new boxcar.

Subpar track conditions, the result of years of deferred maintenance, deteriorated further, particularly in the Midwest. Derailments and wrecks occurred regularly; when the trains avoided mishap, they operated far below design speed, resulting in delayed shipments and excessive overtime. Operating costs soared, and shippers soured on the products. In 1969, most of Maine's potato production rotted in the PC's Selkirk Yard, hurting the Bangor & Aroostook Railroad, whose shippers vowed never to ship by rail again. [7] Although both PRR and NYC had been profitable pre-merger, [2] :248 Penn Central was — at one point — losing $1 million per day.[ citation needed ]

As PC's management struggled to wrestle the company into submission, the structural headwinds facing all northeastern railroads continued unabated. The industrial decline of the Rust Belt consumed shippers through the Northeast and Midwest. [2] Penn Central's executives tried to diversify the troubled firm into real estate and other non-railroad ventures, but in a slow economy these businesses performed little better than the original railroad assets. Worse, these new subsidiaries diverted management attention away from the problems in the core business.

To create the illusion of success, management also insisted on paying dividends to shareholders, desperately borrowing funds to buy time for the business to turn around. Thanks to the dubious accounting strategies of the company's CFO David C. Bevan the railroad had done a good job in 1968 and 1969 of concealing the company's true state to get the money they needed. For example in 1969 the railroad reported a loss of $56 million, while in reality the true figure was around $220 million. [8] :105 A large portion of the savings that year came from writing off the entire passenger department, along with some associated depreciation costs at a total value of $130.5 million. [9] The real financial state of the railroad was hidden to such an extent that not even Saunders knew how bad it really was. [8] :79

All of this financial wrangling was technically legal thanks to the fact that the SEC did not have purview over railroads. That was instead handled by the ICC, which was much more lenient. Many banks were still wary of how unspecific their reports had become, and it would get progressively harder and harder to get loans as time went on. [8] :88

Bankruptcy

U.S. District Judge John P. Fullam was chosen to oversee the reorganization Judge John P. Fullam reviewing the Penn Central case.png
U.S. District Judge John P. Fullam was chosen to oversee the reorganization

By early 1970, PC's financial condition had deteriorated significantly. Commercial banks had largely ceased extending credit, while approximately $150 million in outstanding debt matured that year. The railroad reported a loss exceeding $100 million in the first quarter of 1970. [8] :105 Bevan disclosed the full extent of the company's financial instability to Saunders, who subsequently initiated efforts to secure a federal loan guarantee. The company sought $750 million from Congress and, alternatively, proposed a $200 million direct loan from the Department of Defense, citing its status as a significant freight carrier for the U.S. military. [8] :112

This strategy proved counterproductive. Federal officials required leadership changes as a precondition for any assistance. Saunders, assuming that Bevan's removal would satisfy the requirement, convened a board meeting. The board, however, elected to dismiss both men. Perlman, long viewed unfavorably by certain directors, was also removed at this time. [8] :112 Despite these actions, political opposition, particularly from southern lawmakers, resulted in the failure of both loan proposals. [8] :113 On June 21, 1970, with no viable alternatives remaining, the board of directors voted to file for bankruptcy protection under Section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act. [11]

At the time of its filing, PC was the sixth-largest corporation in the United States. The bankruptcy constituted the largest corporate insolvency in U.S. history until the collapse of the Enron Corporation in 2001. [2] [12] :248 Railroad historian George H. Drury described the event as "cataclysmic" [2] :250, citing its systemic implications for both the railroad sector and the broader business community. The collapse occurred during a period of widespread retrenchment in passenger rail services, which had long represented Penn Central's core business. Railroads across the country discontinued intercity passenger operations as regulatory barriers diminished. The Rock Island and the Milwaukee Road, two major carriers with longstanding financial instability, soon declared bankruptcy.

Following the bankruptcy, new president Paul Gorman resigned. Graham Claytor, president of the Southern Railway, proposed William H. Moore as a successor. Moore had been a protégé of former Southern Railway president D. William Brosnan, known for aggressive cost-cutting and confrontational management. Moore adopted similar practices at PC. [8] :139 Budget reductions were implemented across departments, capital improvement projects were canceled, and yard operations were scaled back. Track maintenance was minimized, and several unautomated hump yards were closed. [8] :137

Map showing the extensive damage left by Hurricane Agnes in 1972 Map of Penn Central lines affected by Hurricane Agnes.png
Map showing the extensive damage left by Hurricane Agnes in 1972
PC locomotive #4312, an EMD E8, at Bay Head yard, Bay Head, New Jersey, April 18, 1971. PC BayHead 041871.jpg
PC locomotive #4312, an EMD E8, at Bay Head yard, Bay Head, New Jersey, April 18, 1971.

In 1972, Hurricane Agnes inflicted widespread damage on PC infrastructure, [13] including main lines and branch routes. The storm contributed to the collapse of other northeastern railroads. By the mid-1970s, few carriers remained solvent in the region east of Rochester and Pittsburgh, north of Philadelphia, and southwest of the Maine and New Hampshire border.

During this period, PC partnered with the U.S. Department of Transportation to test experimental passenger technologies on what would become the Northeast Corridor. The railroad continued operating PRR's Metroliner service between New York City and Washington, D.C., and introduced the United Aircraft TurboTrain between New York and Boston. These efforts failed to produce sustained improvements, primarily due to degraded track conditions and unreliable schedules. In response, the Nixon administration established Amtrak in 1971 to relieve railroads of their passenger service obligations. [2] :250

In a separate effort to generate revenue, PC attempted to sell off air rights above Grand Central Terminal to private developers. The transaction was blocked by New York City, which had designated the terminal a landmark. In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City (1978), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the city's decision and ruled that the landmark designation did not constitute an unlawful taking of property. [14] [15]

By 1974, PC's physical infrastructure had deteriorated severely. Deferred maintenance and hurricane-related damage contributed to a significant increase in derailments, including 649 in a single month. The Cleveland hump yard reported an average of six derailments per day. [16] Some incidents of "standing derailments," in which stationary rolling stock caused structural failures due to rotted crossties, were also documented. A 1973 inspection by the Federal Railroad Administration concluded that continued operation of the network would soon become unsustainable without immediate intervention. [8] :141

Moore's leadership became increasingly controversial. A widely reported incident in December 1973 contributed to his removal. While traveling on a Metroliner between Washington and Philadelphia, Moore was informed that a derailment in a Baltimore tunnel had halted all traffic. After ordering the line cleared within one hour, he called back and summarily dismissed the division superintendent. The call was inadvertently broadcast over the train's public address system, prompting a passenger to respond with an audible insult. Chief trustee Jervis Langdon Jr., already concerned about Moore's reported misuse of railroad labor for home renovations, used the incident to justify Moore's dismissal. Langdon replaced him as president on January 4, 1974. The superintendent was reinstated the same day. [8] :143

In May 1974, the bankruptcy court determined that Penn Central's rail operations would not produce sufficient income to support reorganization. Under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, the federal government assumed control of PC's railroad assets. The United States Railway Association, established for this purpose, spent two years evaluating the holdings of PC and six other bankrupt carriers, including Erie Lackawanna, the Central Railroad of New Jersey, and the Reading Company. On April 1, 1976, PC's viable rail operations were transferred to the federally owned Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail). [2] :250 [17]

Despite federal intervention, freight railroads continued to lose market share to the trucking industry. Industry leaders and labor unions advocated for deregulation. The Staggers Rail Act of 1980 reduced federal oversight and enabled Conrail to implement route consolidations and productivity improvements. [18] Former PC trackage that lacked economic viability was abandoned or repurposed for interim recreational rail trails. In 1987, following a return to profitability, Conrail stock was publicly offered. The company operated as a private entity until its acquisition and division by Norfolk Southern Railway and CSX Transportation in 1999. [2] :250

Corporate survival

PC pre-bankruptcy stock certificate, 1969. PC.PreBk.2.jpg
PC pre-bankruptcy stock certificate, 1969.
PC post-bankruptcy stock certificate, 1974. PC.PostBk.jpg
PC post-bankruptcy stock certificate, 1974.

The Pennsylvania Railroad absorbed the New York Central Railroad on February 1, 1968, and at the same time changed its name to Pennsylvania New York Central Transportation Company to reflect this. The trade name of "Penn Central" was adopted, and, on May 8, the former Pennsylvania Railroad was officially renamed the Penn Central Company.

The first Penn Central Transportation Company (PCTC) was incorporated on April 1, 1969, and its stock was assigned to a new holding company called Penn Central Holding Company. On October 1, 1969, the Penn Central Company, the former Pennsylvania Railroad, absorbed the first PCTC and was renamed the second Penn Central Transportation Company the next day; the Penn Central Holding Company became the second Penn Central Company. Thus, the company that was formerly the Pennsylvania Railroad became the first Penn Central Company and then became the second PCTC. [2] :248

The old Pennsylvania Company, a holding company chartered in 1870, reincorporated in 1958 and long a subsidiary of the PRR, remained a separate corporate entity throughout the period following the merger.

The former Pennsylvania Railroad, now the second PCTC, gave up its railroad assets to Conrail in 1976 and absorbed its legal owner, the second Penn Central Company, in 1978, and at the same time changed its name to The Penn Central Corporation. In the 1970s and 1980s, the company now called The Penn Central Corporation was a small conglomerate that largely consisted of the diversified sub-firms it had before the crash.

Among the properties the company owned when Conrail was created were the Buckeye Pipeline and a 24 percent stake in Madison Square Garden (which stands above Penn Station) and its prime tenants, the New York Knicks basketball team and New York Rangers hockey team, along with Six Flags Theme Parks. Though the company retained ownership of some rights-of-way and station properties connected with the railroads, it continued to liquidate these and eventually concentrated on one of its subsidiaries in the insurance business.

The former Pennsylvania Railroad changed its name to American Premier Underwriters in March 1994. [19] It became part of Carl Lindner's Cincinnati financial empire American Financial Group.

Grand Central Terminal

Main Concourse of Grand Central Terminal. The terminal was owned by Penn Central and its corporate successor until purchased by the MTA in 2018. Grand Central Terminal Main Concourse May 2014.jpg
Main Concourse of Grand Central Terminal. The terminal was owned by Penn Central and its corporate successor until purchased by the MTA in 2018.

Until late 2006, American Financial Group still owned Grand Central Terminal, though all railroad operations were managed by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). The U.S. Surface Transportation Board approved the sale of several of American Financial Group's remaining railroad assets to Midtown TDR Ventures LLC, an investment group controlled by Argent Ventures, [20] in December 2006. [21] The current lease with the MTA was negotiated to last through February 28, 2274. [21] The MTA paid $2.4 million annually in rent in 2007 and had an option to buy the station and tracks in 2017, although Argent could extend the date another 15 years to 2032. [20] The assets included the 156 miles (251 km) of rail used by the Hudson and Harlem Lines, and Grand Central Terminal, as well as unused development rights above the tracks in Midtown Manhattan. The platforms and yards extend for several blocks north of the terminal building under numerous streets and existing buildings leasing air rights, including the MetLife Building and Waldorf-Astoria Hotel. [20]

In November 2018, the MTA proposed purchasing the Hudson and Harlem Lines as well as the Grand Central Terminal for up to $35.065 million, plus a discount rate of 6.25%. The purchase would include all inventory, operations, improvements, and maintenance associated with each asset, except for the air rights over Grand Central. [22] The MTA's finance committee approved the proposed purchase on November 13, 2018, and the purchase was approved by the full board two days later. [23] [24] The deal finally closed in March 2020, with the MTA taking ownership of the terminal and rail lines. [25]

Heritage

Few railroad historians and former employees view the mega-railroad's brief existence favorably, and the company has little presence in the railroad enthusiast press. [2] :250 The preservation group Penn Central Railroad Historical Society was formed in July 2000 to preserve the history of the often-scorned company. [26]

As part of Norfolk Southern Railway's 30th anniversary, the railroad painted 20 new locomotives utilizing former liveries of predecessor railroads. Unit number 1073, a SD70ACe, is painted in a Penn Central Heritage scheme.

As part of the 40th anniversary of the Metro-North Railroad, four locomotives were painted in a different heritage scheme to honor a predecessor railroad. Locomotive 217 was painted in the Penn Central Blue and Yellow scheme.

See also

References

  1. Geisst, Charles R. (2006). Encyclopedia of American Business History, Volume 2. New York: Infobase Publishing. p. 226. ISBN   978-0-8160-4350-7.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Drury, George H. (1994). The Historical Guide to North American Railroads: Histories, Figures, and Features of more than 160 Railroads Abandoned or Merged since 1930. Waukesha, Wisconsin: Kalmbach Media. ISBN   0-89024-072-8.
  3. Loving, Jr, Rush (December 2020). "The Day Railroading Fell Apart". Trains . Kalmbach Media. pp. 20–31.
  4. "Susquehanna Withdraws Demand For Merger With Penn Central". The News. Vol. 73. March 17, 1969. p. 4. Retrieved October 27, 2024 via Newspapers.com. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  5. Goldman, Ari L. (February 9, 1987). "Stuart T. Saunders, Driver Force Behind Penn Central, Dies at 77". The New York Times . Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  6. 1 2 Stover, John F. (1997). American Railroads (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN   978-0-226-77658-3.
  7. Schafer, Mike (2000). More Classic American Railroads. Osceola, Wisconsin: MBI Publishing Co. p. 14. ISBN   978-0-7603-0758-8.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Loving, Rush (2011). The men who loved trains: the story of men who battled greed to save an ailing industry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN   978-0253347572.
  9. "Penn Central Annual Report, 1969" (PDF).
  10. "Penn Central Post Magazine, September 1970 Issue" (PDF).
  11. Charlton, Linda (June 22, 1970). "PENN CENTRAL IS GRANTED AUTHORITY TO REORGANIZE UNDER BANKRUPTCY LAWS". New York Times.
  12. "Michigan's Railroad History 1825–2014" (PDF). Michigan Department of Transportation. 2014-10-13. Retrieved 2024-05-31.
  13. Baer, Christopher T. "PRR Chronology: A General Chronology of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company Predecessors and Successors and its Historical Context". PRR CHRONOLOGY 1972 June 2005 Edition. Archived from the original on 22 December 2013. Retrieved 27 April 2013.
  14. Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City , 438U.S.104 , 135(U.S.1978).
  15. Weaver, Warren Jr. (June 27, 1978). "Ban on Grand Central Office Tower Is Upheld by Supreme Court 6 to 3". The New York Times. Retrieved December 24, 2018.
  16. "Penn Central 1974 - Movie used to get federal funding".
  17. Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act, Pub. L. 94-210, 90  Stat.   31, 45 U.S.C.   § 801. February 5, 1976
  18. Staggers Rail Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-448, 94  Stat.   1895. Approved 1980-10-14.
  19. "Companies betting on name game". The Albany Herald. Associated Press. August 7, 1994. p. 2D.
  20. 1 2 3 Weiss, Lois (July 6, 2007). "Air Rights Make Deals Fly". New York Post . Retrieved January 7, 2016.
  21. 1 2 U.S. Surface Transportation Board, "Midtown TDR Ventures LLC-Acquisition Exemption-American Premier Underwriters, Inc., The Owasco River Railway, Inc., and American Financial Group, Inc.," 71 FR 71026 (December 7, 2006).
  22. "Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting November 2018" (PDF). Metropolitan Transportation Authority. November 13, 2018. pp. 73–74. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 11, 2018. Retrieved November 10, 2018.
  23. Berger, Paul (November 13, 2018). "After Years of Renting, MTA to Buy Grand Central Terminal". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 14, 2018.
  24. "New York's Grand Central Terminal sold for US$35m". Business Times . November 20, 2018. Retrieved November 25, 2018.
  25. "MTA takes ownership of Grand Central Terminal". Progressive Railroading. March 13, 2020. Retrieved March 17, 2020.
  26. "Who We Are". Penn Central Railroad Historical Society. Retrieved 2022-12-25.

Further reading