Iron ore

Hematite, the main iron ore found in Brazilian mines

Stockpiles of iron ore pellets like this one are used in steel production.

An illustration of iron ore being unloaded at docks in Toledo, Ohio

Iron ores ^[1] are rocks and minerals from which metallic iron can be economically extracted. The ores are usually rich in iron oxides and vary in color from dark grey, bright yellow, or deep purple to rusty red. The iron is usually found in the form of magnetite (Fe
_³O
_⁴, 72.4% Fe), hematite (Fe
_²O
_³, 69.9% Fe), goethite (FeO(OH), 62.9% Fe), limonite (FeO(OH)·n(H₂O), 55% Fe), or siderite (FeCO₃, 48.2% Fe).

Ores containing very high quantities of hematite or magnetite, typically greater than about 60% iron, are known as natural ore or direct shipping ore, and can be fed directly into iron-making blast furnaces. Iron ore is the raw material used to make pig iron, which is one of the main raw materials to make steel—98% of the mined iron ore is used to make steel. ^[2] In 2011 the Financial Times quoted Christopher LaFemina, mining analyst at Barclays Capital, saying that iron ore is "more integral to the global economy than any other commodity, except perhaps oil". ^[3]

Sources

Further information: iron cycle

Metallic iron is virtually unknown on the Earth's surface except as iron-nickel alloys from meteorites and very rare forms of deep mantle xenoliths. Although iron is the fourth-most abundant element in the Earth's crust, composing about 5%, the vast majority is bound in silicate or, more rarely, carbonate minerals, and smelting pure iron from these minerals would require a prohibitive amount of energy. Therefore, all sources of iron used by human industry exploit comparatively rarer iron oxide minerals, primarily hematite.

Prehistoric societies used laterite as a source of iron ore. Prior to the industrial revolution, most iron was obtained from widely-available goethite or bog ore, for example, during the American Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars. Historically, much of the iron ore utilized by industrialized societies has been mined from predominantly hematite deposits with grades of around 70% Fe. These deposits are commonly referred to as "direct shipping ores" or "natural ores". Increasing iron ore demand, coupled with the depletion of high-grade hematite ores in the United States, led after World War II to the development of lower-grade iron ore sources, principally the use of magnetite and taconite.

Iron ore mining methods vary by the type of ore being mined. There are four main types of iron ore deposits worked currently, depending on the mineralogy and geology of the ore deposits. These are magnetite, titanomagnetite, massive hematite, and pisolitic ironstone deposits.

The origin of iron can be ultimately traced to its formation through nuclear fusion in stars, and most of the iron is thought to have originated in dying stars that are large enough to explode as supernovae. ^[4] The Earth's core is thought to consist mainly of iron, but this is inaccessible from the surface. Some iron meteorites are thought to have originated from asteroids 1,000 km (620 mi) in diameter or larger. ^[5]

Banded iron formations

Main article: Banded iron formation

Banded iron rock, estimated at being 2.1 billion years old

Processed taconite pellets with reddish surface oxidation used in steelmaking with a U.S. quarter (diameter: 24 mm [0.94 in]) shown for scale

Banded iron formations (BIFs) are sedimentary rocks containing more than 15% iron composed predominantly of thinly-bedded iron minerals and silica (as quartz). Banded iron formations occur exclusively in Precambrian rocks, and are commonly weakly-to-intensely metamorphosed. Banded iron formations may contain iron in carbonates (siderite or ankerite) or silicates (minnesotaite, greenalite, or grunerite), but in those mined as iron ores, oxides (magnetite or hematite) are the principal iron mineral. ^[6] Banded iron formations are known as taconite within North America.

The mining involves moving tremendous amounts of ore and waste. The waste comes in two forms: non-ore bedrock in the mine (overburden or interburden locally known as mullock), and unwanted minerals, which are an intrinsic part of the ore rock itself (gangue). The mullock is mined and piled in waste dumps, and the gangue is separated during the beneficiation process and is removed as tailings. Taconite tailings are mostly the mineral quartz, which is chemically inert. This material is stored in large, regulated water settling ponds.

Magnetite ores

The key parameters for magnetite ore being economic are the crystallinity of the magnetite, the grade of the iron within the banded iron formation host rock, and the contaminant elements which exist within the magnetite concentrate. The size and strip ratio of most magnetite resources is irrelevant, as a banded iron formation can be hundreds of meters thick, extend hundreds of kilometers along strike, and can easily come to more than three billion or more tonnes of contained ore.

The typical grade of iron at which a magnetite-bearing banded iron formation becomes economic is roughly 25% iron, which can generally yield a 33% to 40% recovery of magnetite by weight, to produce a concentrate grading in excess of 64% iron by weight. The typical magnetite iron ore concentrate has less than 0.1% phosphorus, 3–7% silica, and less than 3% aluminium.

As of 2019, magnetite iron ore is mined in Minnesota and Michigan in the United States, eastern Canada, and northern Sweden. ^[7] Magnetite-bearing banded iron formation is mined extensively in Brazil as of 2019, which exports significant quantities to Asia, and there is a nascent and large magnetite iron ore industry in Australia.

Direct-shipping (hematite) ores

Direct-shipping iron ore (DSO) deposits (typically composed of hematite) are currently exploited on all continents except Antarctica, with the largest intensity in South America, Australia, and Asia. Most large hematite iron ore deposits are sourced from altered banded iron formations and (rarely) igneous accumulations.

DSO deposits are typically rarer than the magnetite-bearing BIF or other rocks which form its main source, or protolith rock, but are considerably cheaper to mine and process as they require less beneficiation due to the higher iron content. However, DSO ores can contain significantly higher concentrations of penalty elements, typically being higher in phosphorus, water content (especially pisolite sedimentary accumulations), and aluminium (clays within pisolites). Export-grade DSO ores are generally in the 62–64% Fe range. ^[8]

Magmatic magnetite ore deposits

Granite and ultrapotassic igneous rocks were sometimes used to segregate magnetite crystals and form masses of magnetite suitable for economic concentration. ^[9] A few iron ore deposits, notably in Chile, are formed from volcanic flows containing significant accumulations of magnetite phenocrysts. ^[10] Chilean magnetite iron ore deposits within the Atacama Desert have also formed alluvial accumulations of magnetite in streams leading from these volcanic formations.

Some magnetite skarn and hydrothermal deposits have been worked in the past as high-grade iron ore deposits requiring little beneficiation. There are several granite-associated deposits of this nature in Malaysia and Indonesia.

Other sources of magnetite iron ore include metamorphic accumulations of massive magnetite ore such as at Savage River, Tasmania, formed by shearing of ophiolite ultramafics.

Another, minor, source of iron ores are magmatic accumulations in layered intrusions which contain a typically titanium-bearing magnetite, often with vanadium. These ores form a niche market, with specialty smelters used to recover the iron, titanium, and vanadium. These ores are beneficiated essentially similarly to banded iron formation ores, but usually are more easily upgraded via crushing and screening. The typical titanomagnetite concentrate grades 57% Fe, 12% Ti, and 0.5% V
_²O
_⁵.^{[ citation needed ]}

Mine tailings

For every one ton of iron ore concentrate produced, approximately 2.5–3.0 tons of iron ore tailings will be discharged. Statistics show that there are 130 million tons of iron ore tailings discharged every year. If, for example, the mine tailings contain an average of approximately 11% iron, there would be approximately 1.41 million tons of iron wasted annually. ^[11] These tailings are also high in other useful metals such as copper, nickel, and cobalt, ^[12] and they can be used for road-building materials like pavement and filler and building materials such as cement, low-grade glass, and wall materials. ^{[11] [13] [14]} While tailings are a relatively low-grade ore, they are also inexpensive to collect, as they do not have to be mined. Because of this, companies such as Magnetation have started reclamation projects where they use iron ore tailings as a source of metallic iron. ^[11]

The two main methods of recycling iron from iron ore tailings are magnetizing roasting and direct reduction. Magnetizing roasting uses temperatures between 700 and 900 °C (1,292 and 1,652 °F) for a time of under 1 hour to produce an iron concentrate (Fe₃O₄) to be used for iron smelting. For magnetizing roasting, it is important to have a reducing atmosphere to prevent oxidization and the formation of Fe₂O₃ because it is harder to separate as it is less magnetic. ^{[11] [15]} Direct reduction uses hotter temperatures of over 1,000 °C (1,830 °F) and longer times of 2–5 hours. Direct reduction is used to produce sponge iron (Fe) to be used for steel-making. Direct reduction requires more energy, as the temperatures are higher and the time is longer and it requires more reducing agent than magnetizing roasting. ^{[11] [16] [17]}

Extraction

See also: Mineral processing and Environmental impact of iron ore mining

Lower-grade sources of iron ore generally require beneficiation, using techniques like crushing, milling, gravity or heavy media separation, screening, and silica froth flotation to improve the concentration of the ore and remove impurities. The results, high-quality fine ore powders, are known as fines.

Magnetite

Magnetite is magnetic, and hence easily separated from the gangue minerals and capable of producing a high-grade concentrate with very low levels of impurities.

The grain size of the magnetite and its degree of commingling with the silica groundmass determine the grind size to which the rock must be comminuted to enable efficient magnetic separation to provide a high-purity magnetite concentrate. This determines the energy inputs required to run a milling operation.

Mining of banded iron formations involves coarse crushing and screening, followed by rough crushing and fine grinding to comminute the ore to the point where the crystallized magnetite and quartz are fine enough that the quartz is left behind when the resultant powder is passed under a magnetic separator.

Generally, most magnetite banded iron formation deposits must be ground to between 32 and 45 μm (0.0013 and 0.0018 in) in order to produce a low-silica magnetite concentrate. Magnetite concentrate grades are generally in excess of 70% iron by weight and usually are low in phosphorus, aluminium, titanium, and silica and demand a premium price.

Hematite

Due to the high density of hematite relative to associated silicate gangue, hematite beneficiation usually involves a combination of beneficiation techniques. One method relies on passing the finely-crushed ore over a slurry containing magnetite or other agent such as ferrosilicon which increases its density. When the density of the slurry is properly calibrated, the hematite will sink and the silicate mineral fragments will float and can be removed. ^[18]

Production and consumption

For a more comprehensive list, see list of countries by iron ore production.

Evolution of the extracted iron ore grade in Canada, China, Australia, Brazil, United States, Sweden, the Soviet Union and Russia, and the world. The recent drop in world ore grade is due to significant consumption of low-grade Chinese ores. American ore, on the other hand, is typically upgraded between 61% and 64% before being sold.

Usable iron ore production in million metric tons for 2015 ^[20] The mine production estimates for China are estimated from the National Bureau of Statistics China's crude ore statistics, rather than usable ore as reported for the other countries. ^[21]

Country	Production
Australia	817,000,000 t (804,000,000 long tons; 901,000,000 short tons)
Brazil	397,000,000 t (391,000,000 long tons; 438,000,000 short tons)
China	375,000,000 t (369,000,000 long tons; 413,000,000 short tons)*
India	156,000,000 t (154,000,000 long tons; 172,000,000 short tons)
Russia	101,000,000 t (99,000,000 long tons; 111,000,000 short tons)
South Africa	73,000,000 t (72,000,000 long tons; 80,000,000 short tons)
Ukraine	67,000,000 t (66,000,000 long tons; 74,000,000 short tons)
United States	46,000,000 t (45,000,000 long tons; 51,000,000 short tons)
Canada	46,000,000 t (45,000,000 long tons; 51,000,000 short tons)
Iran	27,000,000 t (27,000,000 long tons; 30,000,000 short tons)
Sweden	25,000,000 t (25,000,000 long tons; 28,000,000 short tons)
Kazakhstan	21,000,000 t (21,000,000 long tons; 23,000,000 short tons)
Other countries	132,000,000 t (130,000,000 long tons; 146,000,000 short tons)
Total world	2,280,000,000 t (2.24×109 long tons; 2.51×109 short tons)

Iron is the world's most commonly used metal—steel, of which iron ore is the key ingredient, represents almost 95% of all metal used per year. ^[3] It is used primarily in structures, ships, automobiles, and machinery.

Iron-rich rocks are common worldwide, but ore-grade commercial mining operations are dominated by the countries listed in the table aside. The major constraint to economics for iron ore deposits is not necessarily the grade or size of the deposits, because it is not particularly hard to geologically prove enough tonnage of the rocks exist. The main constraint is the position of the iron ore relative to market, the cost of rail infrastructure to get it to market, and the energy cost required to do so.

Mining iron ore is a high-volume, low-margin business, as the value of iron is significantly lower than base metals. ^[22] It is highly capital intensive, and requires significant investment in infrastructure such as rail in order to transport the ore from the mine to a freight ship. ^[22] For these reasons, iron ore production is concentrated in the hands of a few major players.

World production averages 2,000,000,000 t (2.0×10⁹ long tons; 2.2×10⁹ short tons) of raw ore annually. The world's largest producer of iron ore is the Brazilian mining corporation Vale, followed by Australian companies Rio Tinto Group and BHP. A further Australian supplier, Fortescue Metals Group Ltd, has helped bring Australia's production to first in the world.

The seaborne trade in iron ore—that is, iron ore to be shipped to other countries—was 849,000,000 t (836,000,000 long tons; 936,000,000 short tons) in 2004. ^[22] Australia and Brazil dominate the seaborne trade, with 72% of the market. ^[22] BHP, Rio and Vale control 66% of this market between them. ^[22]

In Australia, iron ore is won from three main sources: pisolite "channel iron deposit" ore derived by mechanical erosion of primary banded-iron formations and accumulated in alluvial channels such as at Pannawonica, Western Australia; and the dominant metasomatically altered banded iron formation-related ores such as at Newman, the Chichester Range, the Hamersley Range and Koolyanobbing, Western Australia. Other types of ore are coming to the fore recently,^{[ when? ]} such as oxidised ferruginous hardcaps, for instance laterite iron ore deposits near Lake Argyle in Western Australia.

The total recoverable reserves of iron ore in India are about 9,602,000,000 t (9.450×10⁹ long tons; 1.0584×10¹⁰ short tons) of hematite and 3,408,000,000 t (3.354×10⁹ long tons; 3.757×10⁹ short tons) of magnetite. ^[23] Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Jharkhand, Odisha, Goa, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Rajasthan, and Tamil Nadu are the principal Indian producers of iron ore. World consumption of iron ore grows 10% per year ^{[ citation needed ]} on average with the main consumers being China, Japan, Korea, the United States, and the European Union.

China is currently the largest consumer of iron ore, which translates to be the world's largest steel producing country. It is also the largest importer, buying 52% of the seaborne trade in iron ore in 2004. ^[22] China is followed by Japan and Korea, which consume a significant amount of raw iron ore and metallurgical coal. In 2006, China produced 588,000,000 t (579,000,000 long tons; 648,000,000 short tons) of iron ore, with an annual growth of 38%.

Iron ore market

Iron ore prices (monthly)

  China import/inbound iron ore spot price

  Global iron ore price

Iron ore prices (daily)
25 October 2010 - 4 August 2022

Over the last 40 years, iron ore prices have been decided in closed-door negotiations between the small handful of miners and steelmakers which dominate both spot and contract markets. Until 2006, prices were determined in annual benchmark negotiations between the main iron ore producers (BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, and Vale S.A.) and Japanese importers. ^{[26] : 31} In 2006, Chinese company Baosteel began handling negotiations for the importer side. ^{[26] : 31} The Chinese government replaced Baosteel with China Iron and Steel Association as lead negotiator in 2009. ^{[26] : 109} Traditionally, the first deal reached between these the major producers and the major importers sets a benchmark to be followed by the rest of the industry. ^[3]

Singapore Mercantile Exchange (SMX) has launched the world's first global iron ore futures contract, based on the Metal Bulletin Iron Ore Index (MBIOI) which uses daily price data from a broad spectrum of industry participants and independent Chinese steel consultancy and data provider Shanghai Steelhome's widespread contact base of steel producers and iron ore traders across China. ^[27] The futures contract has seen monthly volumes over 1,500,000 t (1,500,000 long tons; 1,700,000 short tons) after eight months of trading. ^[28]

This move follows a switch to index-based quarterly pricing by the world's three largest iron ore miners—Vale, Rio Tinto, and BHP—in early 2010, breaking a 40-year tradition of benchmark annual pricing. ^[29]

Abundance by country

Available world iron ore resources

Iron is the most abundant element on earth but not in the crust. ^[30] The extent of the accessible iron ore reserves is not known, though Lester Brown of the Worldwatch Institute suggested in 2006 that iron ore could run out within 64 years (that is, by 2070), based on 2% growth in demand per year. ^[31]

Australia

Geoscience Australia calculates that the country's "economic demonstrated resources" of iron currently amount to 24 gigatonnes, or 24,000,000,000 t (2.4×10¹⁰ long tons; 2.6×10¹⁰ short tons).^{[ citation needed ]} Another estimate places Australia's reserves of iron ore at 52,000,000,000 t (5.1×10¹⁰ long tons; 5.7×10¹⁰ short tons), or 30% of the world's estimated 170,000,000,000 t (1.7×10¹¹ long tons; 1.9×10¹¹ short tons), of which Western Australia accounts for 28,000,000,000 t (2.8×10¹⁰ long tons; 3.1×10¹⁰ short tons). ^[32] The current production rate from the Pilbara region of Western Australia is approximately 844,000,000 t (831,000,000 long tons; 930,000,000 short tons) per year and rising. ^[33] Gavin Mudd (RMIT University) and Jonathon Law (CSIRO) expect it to be gone within 30–50 years and 56 years, respectively. ^[34] These 2010 estimates require ongoing review to take into account shifting demand for lower-grade iron ore and improving mining and recovery techniques (allowing deeper mining below the groundwater table).

Brazil

Brazil is the second-largest producer of iron ore after Australia, accounting for 16% of the world's iron ore production. After a somewhat sluggish production volume 2010-2020, partly due to the Mariana dam disaster in 2015 and the Brumadinho dam disaster in 2019, which halted the production at the two involved mines, production has increased steadily since 2021, when Brazil produced 431,000,000 t (424,000,000 long tons; 475,000,000 short tons). In 2022 it increased to 435,000,000 t (428,000,000 long tons; 480,000,000 short tons) and in 2023 to 440,000,000 t (430,000,000 long tons; 490,000,000 short tons). ^[35]

The Brazilian production is expected to rise by a CAGR of 2% between 2023 and 2027, ^[36] and industry analyst Fitch Solutions forecasted in 2021 that Brazil's annual production will reach 592,000,000 t (583,000,000 long tons; 653,000,000 short tons) by 2030. ^[37]

Canada

In 2017, Canadian iron ore mines produced 49,000,000 t (48,000,000 long tons; 54,000,000 short tons) of iron ore in concentrate pellets and 13.6 million tons of crude steel. Of the 13,600,000 t (13,400,000 long tons; 15,000,000 short tons) of steel 7,000,000 t (6,900,000 long tons; 7,700,000 short tons) was exported, and 43,100,000 t (42,400,000 long tons; 47,500,000 short tons) of iron ore was exported at a value of $4.6 billion. Of the iron ore exported, 38.5% of the volume was iron ore pellets with a value of $2.3 billion, and 61.5% was iron ore concentrates with a value of $2.3 billion. ^[38] 46% of Canada's iron ore comes from the Iron Ore Company of Canada mine, in Labrador City, Newfoundland, with secondary sources including the Mary River Mine in Nunavut. ^{[38] [39]}

India

According to the U.S. Geological Survey's 2021 Report on iron ore, ^[40] India is estimated to produce 59,000,000 t (58,000,000 long tons; 65,000,000 short tons) of iron ore in 2020, placing it as the seventh-largest global center of iron ore production, behind Australia, Brazil, China, Russia, South Africa, and Ukraine.

India's iron ore production in 2023 was 285,000,000 metric tonnes and was the fourth largest producer in the world. ^[41]

Ukraine

According to the U.S. Geological Survey's 2021 Report on iron ore, ^[40] Ukraine is estimated to have produced 62,000,000 t (61,000,000 long tons; 68,000,000 short tons) of iron ore in 2020, placing it as the seventh largest global center of iron ore production, behind Australia, Brazil, China, India, Russia, and South Africa. Producers of iron ore in Ukraine include Ferrexpo, Metinvest, and ArcelorMittal Kryvyi Rih.

United States

In 2014, mines in the United States produced 57,500,000 t (56,600,000 long tons; 63,400,000 short tons) of iron ore with an estimated value of $5.1 billion. ^[42] Iron mining in the United States is estimated to have accounted for 2% of the world's iron ore output. In the United States there are twelve iron ore mines, with nine being open pit mines and three being reclamation operations. There were also ten pelletizing plants, nine concentration plants, two direct-reduced iron (DRI) plants, and one iron nugget plant that were operating in 2014. ^[42] In the United States the majority of iron ore mining is in the iron ranges around Lake Superior. These iron ranges occur in Minnesota and Michigan, which combined accounted for 93% of the usable iron ore produced in the United States in 2014. Seven of the nine operational open pit mines in the United States are located in Minnesota as well as two of the three tailings reclamation operations. The other two active open pit mines were located in Michigan. In 2016, one of the two mines shut down. ^[42] There have also been iron ore mines in Utah and Alabama; however, the last iron ore mine in Utah shut down in 2014 ^[42] and the last iron ore mine in Alabama shut down in 1975. ^[43]

Smelting

Main articles: blast furnace and bloomery

Iron ores consist of oxygen and iron atoms bonded together into molecules. To convert it to metallic iron, it must be smelted or sent through a direct reduction process to remove the oxygen. Oxygen-iron bonds are strong, and to remove the iron from the oxygen, a stronger elemental bond must be presented to attach to the oxygen. Carbon is used because the strength of a carbon-oxygen bond is greater than that of the iron-oxygen bond at high temperatures. Thus, the iron ore must be powdered and mixed with coke, to be burnt in the smelting process.

Carbon monoxide is the primary ingredient of chemically stripping oxygen from iron. Thus, the iron and carbon smelting must be kept in an oxygen-deficient (reducing) state to promote the burning of carbon to produce CO and not CO
_².

• Air blast and charcoal (coke): 2 C + O₂ → 2 CO
• Carbon monoxide (CO) is the principal reduction agent.
  • Stage One: 3 Fe₂O₃ + CO → 2 Fe₃O₄ + CO₂
  • Stage Two: Fe₃O₄ + CO → 3 FeO + CO₂
  • Stage Three: FeO + CO → Fe + CO₂
• Limestone calcining: CaCO₃ → CaO + CO₂
• Lime acting as flux: CaO + SiO₂ → CaSiO₃

Trace elements

The inclusion of even small amounts of some elements can have profound effects on the behavioral characteristics of a batch of iron or the operation of a smelter. These effects can be both good and bad, some catastrophically bad. Some chemicals are deliberately added, such as flux, which makes a blast furnace more efficient. Others are added because they make the iron more fluid, harder, or give it some other desirable quality. The choice of ore, fuel, and flux determines how the slag behaves and the operational characteristics of the iron produced. Ideally, iron ore contains only iron and oxygen. In reality, this is rarely the case. Typically, iron ore contains a host of elements which are often unwanted in modern steel.

Silicon

Silica (SiO
_²) is almost always present in iron ore. Most of it is slagged off during the smelting process. At temperatures above 1,300 °C (2,370 °F), some will be reduced and form an alloy with the iron. The hotter the furnace, the more silicon will be present in the iron. It is not uncommon to find up to 1.5% Si in European cast iron from the 16th to 18th centuries.

The major effect of silicon is to promote the formation of grey iron. Grey iron is less brittle and easier to finish than white iron. It is preferred for casting purposes for this reason. British metallurgist Thomas Turner reported that silicon also reduces shrinkage and the formation of blowholes, lowering the number of bad castings. However, too much silicon present in the iron leads to increased brittleness and moderate hardness. ^[44]

Phosphorus

Phosphorus (P) has four major effects on iron: increased hardness and strength, lower solidus, increased fluidity, and cold shortness. Depending on the use intended for the iron, these effects are either good or bad. Bog ore often has a high phosphorus content. ^[45]

The strength and hardness of iron increases with the concentration of phosphorus. 0.05% phosphorus in wrought iron makes it as hard as medium-carbon steel. High-phosphorus iron can also be hardened by cold hammering. The hardening effect is true for any concentration of phosphorus. The more phosphorus, the harder the iron becomes and the more it can be hardened by hammering. Modern steel makers can increase hardness by as much as 30%, without sacrificing shock resistance by maintaining phosphorus levels between 0.07 and 0.12%. It also increases the depth of hardening due to quenching, but at the same time also decreases the solubility of carbon in iron at high temperatures. This would decrease its usefulness in making blister steel (cementation), where the speed and amount of carbon absorption is the overriding consideration.

The addition of phosphorus has a downside. At concentrations higher than 0.2%, iron becomes increasingly cold short, or brittle at low temperatures. Cold short is especially important for bar iron. Although bar iron is usually worked hot, its uses^{[ example needed ]} often require it to be tough, bendable, and resistant to shock at room temperature. A nail that shatters when hit with a hammer or a carriage wheel that breaks when it hit a rock would not sell well.^{[ citation needed ]} High enough concentrations of phosphorus render any iron unusable. ^[46] The effects of cold shortness are magnified by temperature. Thus, a piece of iron that is perfectly serviceable in summer might become extremely brittle in winter. There is some evidence that during the Middle Ages the very wealthy may have had a high-phosphorus sword for summer and a low-phosphorus sword for winter. ^[46]

Careful control of phosphorus can be of great benefit in casting operations. Phosphorus depresses the liquidus, allowing the iron to remain molten for longer and increasing fluidity. The addition of 1% can double the distance molten iron will flow. ^[46] The maximum effect, about 500 °C (932 °F), is achieved at a concentration of 10.2%. ^[47] For foundry work Turner ^[48] felt the ideal iron had 0.2–0.55% phosphorus. The resulting iron filled molds with fewer voids and also shrank less. In the 19th century some producers of decorative cast iron used iron with up to 5% phosphorus. The extreme fluidity allowed them to make very complex and delicate castings, but they could not be weight-bearing, as they had no strength. ^[49]

There are two remedies^{[ according to whom? ]} for high-phosphorus iron. The oldest, easiest, and cheapest, is avoidance. If the iron that the ore produced was cold short, one would search for a new source of iron ore. The second method involves oxidizing the phosphorus during the fining process by adding iron oxide. This technique is usually associated with puddling in the 19th century, and may not have been understood earlier. For instance, Isaac Zane, owner of Marlboro Iron Works, did not appear to know about it in 1772. Given Zane's reputation^{[ according to whom? ]} for keeping abreast of the latest developments, the technique was probably unknown to the ironmasters of Virginia and Pennsylvania.

Phosphorus is generally considered to be a deleterious contaminant because it makes steel brittle, even at concentrations of as little as 0.6%. When the Gilchrist–Thomas process allowed the removal of bulk amounts of the element from cast iron in the 1870s, it was a major development because most of the iron ores mined in continental Europe at the time were phosphorous. However, removing all the contaminant by fluxing or smelting is complicated, and so desirable iron ores must generally be low in phosphorus to begin with.

Aluminium

Small amounts of aluminium (Al) are present in many ores including iron ore, sand, and some limestones. The former can be removed by washing the ore prior to smelting. Until the introduction of brick-lined furnaces, the amount of aluminium contamination was small enough that it did not have an effect on either the iron or slag. However, when brick began to be used for hearths and the interior of blast furnaces, the amount of aluminium contamination increased dramatically. This was due to the erosion of the furnace lining by the liquid slag.

Aluminium is difficult to reduce. As a result, aluminium contamination of the iron is not a problem. However, it does increase the viscosity of the slag. ^{[50] [51]} This will have a number of adverse effects on furnace operation. The thicker slag will slow the descent of the charge, prolonging the process. High aluminium will also make it more difficult to tap off the liquid slag. At the extreme, this could lead to a frozen furnace.

There are a number of solutions to a high-aluminium slag. The first is avoidance; do not use ore or a lime source with a high aluminium content. Increasing the ratio of lime flux will decrease the viscosity. ^[51]

Sulfur

Sulfur (S) is a frequent contaminant in coal. It is also present in small quantities in many ores, but can be removed by calcining. Sulfur dissolves readily in both liquid and solid iron at the temperatures present in iron smelting. The effects of even small amounts of sulfur are immediate and serious. They were one of the first worked out by iron makers. Sulfur causes iron to be red or hot short. ^[52]

Hot short iron is brittle when hot. This was a serious problem as most iron used during the 17th and 18th centuries was bar or wrought iron. Wrought iron is shaped by repeated blows with a hammer while hot. A piece of hot short iron will crack if worked with a hammer. When a piece of hot iron or steel cracks, the exposed surface immediately oxidizes. This layer of oxide prevents the mending of the crack by welding. Large cracks cause the iron or steel to break up. Smaller cracks can cause the object to fail during use. The degree of hot shortness is in direct proportion to the amount of sulfur present. Today, iron with over 0.03% sulfur is avoided.

Hot short iron can be worked, but it must be worked at low temperatures. Working at lower temperatures requires more physical effort from the smith or forgeman. The metal must be struck more often and harder to achieve the same result. A mildly sulfur-contaminated bar can be worked, but it requires a great deal more time and effort.

In cast iron, sulfur promotes the formation of white iron. As little as 0.5% can counteract the effects of slow cooling and a high silicon content. ^[53] White cast iron is more brittle, but also harder. It is generally avoided, because it is difficult to work, except in China where high-sulfur cast iron, some as high as 0.57%, made with coal and coke, was used to make bells and chimes. ^[54] According to Turner (1900 , pp. 200), good foundry iron should have less than 0.15% sulfur. In the rest of the world, a high-sulfur cast iron can be used for making castings, but will make poor wrought iron.

There are a number of remedies for sulfur contamination. The first, and the one most used in historic and prehistoric operations, is avoidance. Coal was not used in Europe (unlike China) as a fuel for smelting because it contains sulfur and therefore causes hot short iron. If an ore resulted in hot short metal, ironmasters looked for another ore. When mineral coal was first used in European blast furnaces in 1709 (or perhaps earlier), it was coked. Only with the introduction of hot blast from 1829 was raw coal used.

Ore roasting

Sulfur can be removed from ores by roasting and washing. Roasting oxidizes sulfur to form sulfur dioxide (SO₂), which either escapes into the atmosphere or can be washed out. In warm climates, it is possible to leave pyritic ore out in the rain. The combined action of rain, bacteria, and heat oxidize the sulfides to sulfuric acid and sulfates, which are water-soluble and leached out. ^[55] However, historically (at least), iron sulfide (iron pyrite FeS
_²), though a common iron mineral, has not been used as an ore for the production of iron metal. Natural weathering was also used in Sweden. The same process, at geological speed, results in the gossan limonite ores.

The importance attached to low-sulfur iron is demonstrated by the consistently higher prices paid for the iron of Sweden, Russia, and Spain from the 16th to 18th centuries. Today sulfur is no longer a problem. The modern remedy is the addition of manganese, but the operator must know how much sulfur is in the iron because at least five times as much manganese must be added to neutralize it. Some historic irons display manganese levels, but most are well below the level needed to neutralize sulfur. ^[53]

Sulfide inclusion as manganese sulfide (MnS) can also be the cause of severe pitting corrosion problems in low-grade stainless steel such as AISI 304 steel. ^{[56] [57]} Under oxidizing conditions and in the presence of moisture, when sulfide oxidizes, it produces thiosulfate anions as intermediate species, and because the thiosulfate anion has a higher equivalent electromobility than the chloride anion due to its double negative electrical charge, it promotes pit growth. ^[58] Indeed, the positive electrical charges born by Fe²⁺ cations released in solution by Fe oxidation on the anodic zone inside the pit must be quickly compensated / neutralized by negative charges brought by the electrokinetic migration of anions in the capillary pit. Some of the electrochemical processes occurring in a capillary pit are the same as those encountered in capillary electrophoresis. The higher the anion electrokinetic migration rate, the higher the rate of pitting corrosion. Electrokinetic transport of ions inside the pit can be the rate-limiting step in the pit growth rate.

See also

• Bog iron
• Iron ore in Africa
• Ironstone
• Environmental impact of iron ore mining

Citations

1. Ramanaidou and Wells, 2014
2. "Iron Ore – Hematite, Magnetite & Taconite". Mineral Information Institute. Archived from the original on 17 April 2006. Retrieved 7 April 2006.
3. Iron ore pricing emerges from stone age, Financial Times, October 26, 2009 Archived 2011-03-22 at the Wayback Machine
4. Frey, Perry A.; Reed, George H. (21 September 2012). "The Ubiquity of Iron". ACS Chemical Biology. 7 (9): 1477–1481. doi:10.1021/cb300323q. ISSN   1554-8929. PMID   22845493.
5. Goldstein, J.I.; Scott, E.R.D.; Chabot, N.L. (2009). "Iron meteorites: Crystallization, thermal history, parent bodies, and origin". Geochemistry. 69 (4): 293–325. Bibcode:2009ChEG...69..293G. doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2009.01.002.
6. Harry Klemic, Harold L. James, and G. Donald Eberlein, (1973) "Iron," in United States Mineral Resources, US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 820, p.298-299.
7. Troll, Valentin R.; Weis, Franz A.; Jonsson, Erik; Andersson, Ulf B.; Majidi, Seyed Afshin; Högdahl, Karin; Harris, Chris; Millet, Marc-Alban; Chinnasamy, Sakthi Saravanan; Kooijman, Ellen; Nilsson, Katarina P. (12 April 2019). "Global Fe–O isotope correlation reveals magmatic origin of Kiruna-type apatite-iron-oxide ores". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 1712. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.1712T. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09244-4 . ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   6461606 . PMID   30979878.
8. Muwanguzi, Abraham J. B.; Karasev, Andrey V.; Byaruhanga, Joseph K.; Jönsson, Pär G. (3 December 2012). "Characterization of Chemical Composition and Microstructure of Natural Iron Ore from Muko Deposits". ISRN Materials Science. 2012: e174803. doi: 10.5402/2012/174803 . S2CID   56961299.
9. Jonsson, Erik; Troll, Valentin R.; Högdahl, Karin; Harris, Chris; Weis, Franz; Nilsson, Katarina P.; Skelton, Alasdair (10 April 2013). "Magmatic origin of giant 'Kiruna-type' apatite-iron-oxide ores in Central Sweden". Scientific Reports. 3 (1): 1644. Bibcode:2013NatSR...3E1644J. doi: 10.1038/srep01644 . ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   3622134 . PMID   23571605.
10. Guijón, R.; Henríquez, F.; Naranjo, J.A. (2011). "Geological, Geographical and Legal Considerations for the Conservation of Unique Iron Oxide and Sulphur Flows at El Laco and Lastarria Volcanic Complexes, Central Andes, Northern Chile". Geoheritage. 3 (4): 99–315. Bibcode:2011Geohe...3..299G. doi:10.1007/s12371-011-0045-x. S2CID   129179725.
11. Li, Chao; Sun, Henghu; Bai, Jing; Li, Longtu (15 February 2010). "Innovative methodology for comprehensive utilization of iron ore tailings: Part 1. The recovery of iron from iron ore tailings using magnetic separation after magnetizing roasting". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 174 (1–3): 71–77. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.018. PMID   19782467.
12. Sirkeci, A. A.; Gül, A.; Bulut, G.; Arslan, F.; Onal, G.; Yuce, A. E. (April 2006). "Recovery of Co, Ni, and Cu from the tailings of Divrigi Iron Ore Concentrator". Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 27 (2): 131–141. Bibcode:2006MPEMR..27..131S. doi:10.1080/08827500600563343. ISSN   0882-7508. S2CID   93632258.
13. Das, S.K.; Kumar, Sanjay; Ramachandrarao, P. (December 2000). "Exploitation of iron ore tailing for the development of ceramic tiles". Waste Management. 20 (8): 725–729. Bibcode:2000WaMan..20..725D. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00034-9.
14. Gzogyan, T. N.; Gubin, S. L.; Gzogyan, S. R.; Mel’nikova, N. D. (1 November 2005). "Iron losses in processing tailings". Journal of Mining Science. 41 (6): 583–587. Bibcode:2005JMinS..41..583G. doi:10.1007/s10913-006-0022-y. ISSN   1573-8736. S2CID   129896853.
15. Uwadiale, G. G. O. O.; Whewell, R. J. (1 October 1988). "Effect of temperature on magnetizing reduction of agbaja iron ore". Metallurgical Transactions B. 19 (5): 731–735. Bibcode:1988MTB....19..731U. doi:10.1007/BF02650192. ISSN   1543-1916. S2CID   135733613.
16. Stephens, F. M.; Langston, Benny; Richardson, A. C. (1 June 1953). "The Reduction-Oxidation Process For the Treatment of Taconites". JOM. 5 (6): 780–785. Bibcode:1953JOM.....5f.780S. doi:10.1007/BF03397539. ISSN   1543-1851.
17. H.T. Shen, B. Zhou, et al. "Roasting-magnetic separation and direct reduction of a refractory oolitic-hematite ore" Min. Met. Eng., 28 (2008), pp. 30-43
18. Gaudin, A.M, Principles of Mineral Dressing, 1937
19. Graphic from The "Limits to Growth" and 'Finite' Mineral Resources, p. 5, Gavin M. Mudd
20. Tuck, Christopher. "Mineral Commodity Summaries 2017" (PDF). U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
21. Tuck, Christopher. "Global iron ore production data; Clarification of reporting from the USGS" (PDF). U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
22. Iron ore pricing war, Financial Times, October 14, 2009
23. Qazi, Shabir Ahmad; Qazi, Navaid Shabir (1 January 2008). Natural Resource Conservation and Environment Management. APH Publishing. ISBN   9788131304044 . Retrieved 12 November 2016– via Google Books.
24. "Iron Ore - Monthly Price - Commodity Prices - Price Charts, Data, and News". IndexMundi. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
25. "Global price of Iron Ore | FRED | St. Louis Fed". Fred.stlouisfed.org. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
26. Massot, Pascale (2024). China's Vulnerability Paradox: How the World's Largest Consumer Transformed Global Commodity Markets. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-777140-2.
27. "SMX to list world's first index based iron ore futures". 29 September 2010. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
28. "ICE Futures Singapore - Futures Exchange" . Retrieved 12 November 2016.
29. "mbironoreindex". Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 20 October 2010.
30. Morgan, J. W.; Anders, E. (1980). "Chemical composition of Earth, Venus, and Mercury". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 77 (12): 6973–77. Bibcode:1980PNAS...77.6973M. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.6973 . PMC   350422 . PMID   16592930.
31. Brown, Lester (2006). Plan B 2.0. New York: W.W. Norton. p. 109.
32. "Iron Ore". Government of Western Australia - Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety. Retrieved 6 August 2021.
33. Western Australian Mineral and Petroleum Statistics Digest 2021–22 (PDF) (Report). Government of Western Australia Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety. 2022.
34. Pincock, Stephen (14 July 2010). "Iron Ore Country". ABC Science. Retrieved 28 November 2012.
35. "Mine production of iron ore in Brazil from 2010 to 2023". Statista . 19 April 2024. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
36. "Iron ore production in Brazil and major projects". Mining Technology. 5 July 2024. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
37. "Global Iron Ore Mining Outlook" (PDF). Fitch Solutions . 26 August 2021. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
38. Canada, Natural Resources (23 January 2018). "Iron ore facts". www.nrcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 16 February 2019.
39. "Mining the Future 2030: A Plan for Growth in the Newfoundland and Labrador Mining Industry | McCarthy Tétrault". 19 November 2018.
40. "USGS Report on Iron Ore, 2021" (PDF).
41. "List of countries by iron ore production", Wikipedia, 31 October 2023, retrieved 13 February 2024
42. "USGS Minerals Information: Iron Ore". minerals.usgs.gov. Retrieved 16 February 2019.
43. Lewis S. Dean, Minerals in the economy of Alabama 2007Archived 2015-09-24 at the Wayback Machine, Alabama Geological Survey, 2008
44. Turner 1900, p. 287.
45. Gordon 1996, p. 57.
46. Rostoker & Bronson 1990, p. 22.
47. Rostoker & Bronson 1990, p. 194.
48. Turner 1900.
49. Turner 1900, pp. 202–204.
50. Kato & Minowa 1969, p. 37.
51. Rosenqvist 1983, p. 311.
52. Gordon 1996, p. 7.
53. Rostoker & Bronson 1990, p. 21.
54. Rostoker, Bronson & Dvorak 1984, p. 760.
55. Turner 1900, pp. 77.
56. Stewart, J.; Williams, D.E. (1992). "The initiation of pitting corrosion on austenitic stainless steel: on the role and importance of sulphide inclusions". Corrosion Science. 33 (3): 457–474. Bibcode:1992Corro..33..457S. doi:10.1016/0010-938X(92)90074-D. ISSN   0010-938X.
57. Williams, David E.; Kilburn, Matt R.; Cliff, John; Waterhouse, Geoffrey I.N. (2010). "Composition changes around sulphide inclusions in stainless steels, and implications for the initiation of pitting corrosion". Corrosion Science. 52 (11): 3702–3716. Bibcode:2010Corro..52.3702W. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.021. ISSN   0010-938X.
58. Newman, R. C.; Isaacs, H. S.; Alman, B. (1982). "Effects of sulfur compounds on the pitting behavior of type 304 stainless steel in near-neutral chloride solutions". Corrosion. 38 (5): 261–265. doi:10.5006/1.3577348. ISSN   0010-9312.

General and cited references

• Gordon, Robert B. (1996). American Iron 1607–1900. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Kato, Makoto; Minowa, Susumu (1969). "Viscosity Measurement of Molten Slag- Properties of Slag at Elevated Temperature (Part 1)". Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan. 9. Tokyo: Nihon Tekko Kyokai: 31–38. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational1966.9.31 .
• Ramanaidou, E. R. and Wells, M. A. (2014). 13.13 "Sedimentary Hosted Iron Ores". In: Holland, H. D. and Turekian, K. K. Eds., Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier. 313–355. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.01115-3.
• Rosenqvist, Terkel (1983). Principles of Extractive Metallurgy. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Rostoker, William; Bronson, Bennet (1990). Pre-Industrial Iron: Its Technology and Ethnology. Archeomaterials Monograph No. 1.
• Rostoker, William; Bronson, Bennet; Dvorak, James (1984). "The Cast-Iron Bells of China". Technology and Culture. 25 (4). The Society for the History of Technology: 750–767. doi:10.2307/3104621. JSTOR   3104621. S2CID   112143315.
• Turner, Thomas (1900). The Metallurgy of Iron (2nd ed.). Charles Griffin & Company, Limited.

External links

• Historical documents
  • History of the Iron Ore Trade on the Great Lakes (1910 Annual Report of the Lake Carriers' Association, made available online by the Michael Schwartz Library of Cleveland State University)
  • James Stephen Jeans, Pioneers of the Cleveland Iron Trade (1875)
• Modern information
  • Global price of Iron Ore data from the International Monetary Fund, made available via Federal Reserve Economic Data
  • Iron Ore Statistics and Information from the U.S. Geological Survey's National Minerals Information Center
  • World's Largest Iron Ore Producers, 2023, analysis from James F. King