The Norwegian Safety Investigation Authority

Last updated
The Norwegian Safety Investigation Authority
Statens havarikommisjon
Statens havarikommisjon.jpg
Agency overview
Formed1 January 1989 (1989-01-01) (33 years ago)
Preceding agencies
  • Aviation Accident Commission
  • Institute of Maritime Enquiry
Type Government agency
Jurisdiction Government of Norway
Headquarters Kjeller, Skedsmo, Norway
59°58′04″N11°02′10″E / 59.96772°N 11.03623°E / 59.96772; 11.03623
Parent department Ministry of Transport
Website havarikommisjonen.no

The Norwegian Safety Investigation Authority (NSIA; Norwegian : Statens havarikommisjon, SHK) is the government agency responsible for investigating transport-related accidents within Norway. Specifically, it investigates aviation accidents and incidents, rail accidents, maritime accidents, select traffic accidents, and serious incidents in the defence sector.

Contents

All investigations aim to find underlying causes and to improve safety; criminal investigation is not part of AIBN's mandate. Subordinate to the Ministry of Transport, the agency is located on the premises of Kjeller Airport in Skedsmo.

Traditionally marine accidents were investigated Institute of Maritime Enquiry, which mixed safety investigation, criminal and civil liability into a combined investigation. Aviation accidents and major rail accidents were investigated by ad hoc commissions. The Accident Investigation Board for Civil Aviation was established as a permanent organization on 1 January 1989, originally based at Oslo Airport, Fornebu. From 2002 it also took over investigating rail accidents, road accidents were included in 2005, marine accidents from 2008 and finally defense sector accidents in 2020.

History

Former commissions

Traditionally, marine accident investigation was carried out by the Institute of Maritime Enquiry (Sjøforklaringsinstituttet) and the Permanent Investigation Board for Special Accidents in the Fisheries Fleet. [1] This system centered around mandatory inquiries carried out by a district court. [2] In exceptional cases the Norwegian government had the jurisdiction to appoint an ad hoc investigation board. [3]

At the time of Norway's first major civilian aviation accident, the Havørn accident on 16 June 1936, no particular routine existed for investigating aviation accidents. An ad hoc commission was established at the scene to investigate it, consisting of Chief of Police Alf Reksten, Sheriff Kaare Bredvik, the Norwegian Air Lines' technical director Bernt Balchen, Captain Eckhoff of the aviation authorities, and Gjermundson from the insurance company. [4]

A similar organization took place from 1945 to 1956, where the government appointed an accident investigation commission for each accident and incident. [5] These commissions had no permanent organization or members and were appointed for each accident on an ad hoc basis. Its members normally consisted of staff from the Norwegian Air Traffic and Airport Management and the Royal Norwegian Air Force. [1] In addition, it had representatives from the Norwegian Police Service and the Norwegian Prosecuting Authority. [6]

From 1956, a permanent secretariat was appointed, [5] the Aviation Accident Commission (Flyhavarikommisjonen), but the various commissions members were only tied to the commission during the period of the investigation. By the 1980s, this had increased to two full-time technicians and a clerk. This period had accident commissions with a significantly different mission from later. Firstly, it only investigated actual accidents of a certain size. General-aviation accidents and near accidents were not investigated. Secondly, the commissions were both given the task to uncover the cause of the accident from a safety point of view, but also to uncover any criminal occurrences. This was the reason for including police and prosecution officials in the commissions. [6]

Within the railway sector, accident investigation had been carried out by the Norwegian State Railways and its successors, the Norwegian National Rail Administration and the Norwegian State Railways. [7] Major accidents were thereby investigated by in-house commissions with the potential for conflicts of interest, or through ad hoc committees appointed by the government. Similar to marine accidents, it was ultimately a subjective call by the Ministry of Transport and Communications to make the call for if a committee were needed. [8]

Establishment

During the 1980s, a shift occurred in the view of aviation accident commissions, and by 1988, the Ministry of Transport and Communications launched a specific proposal to create a permanent agency responsible for aviation accident and incident investigation. This followed changes to international law according to regulations set down by the International Civil Aviation Organization. The ministry primarily stressed the mix of criminal and safety preventative as contrary to international law, as well as near-accidents being investigated by NATAM. Secondary concerns were that since the commission members were part-time employees, investigations would drag on unnecessarily, as freeing up the members from the regular jobs was often difficult. The investigators also often arrived late at the scene of the crime due to these conditions. [6] One alternative proposal was to make the commission part of the Civil Aviation Authority of Norway, [9] although this never materialized as the latter was not created until later. [5]

The legal framework took effect on 1 January 1989, and the same day, the Accident Investigation Board for Civil Aviation (Havarikommisjonen for sivil luftfart) was established. In its primordial form it was organized as an office within the Ministry of Transport and Communications. [10] Its first director was Ragnar Rygnestad, which had been the former commission's secretary for ten years. The board soon received five employees. [11] The legal changes meant that near-accidents were also investigated, significantly increasing the number of cases to be handled. By June, the agency still did not have sufficient staff to handle all cases, [12] and in particular had not yet implemented human behavior and psychological expertise. [13] It was initially based at Villa Hareløkka on the premises of Oslo Airport, Fornebu in Bærum. In addition, it used a military hangar at Kjeller Airport to store and reconstruct aircraft parts. [14]

The board was reorganized from 1 July 1999, when it was split out of the ministry and became an independent government agency. [10] By then, the agency had 15 employees. [8] Oslo Airport, Fornebu was closed down 1998, so the board was forced to move from its premises. The board subsequently relocated to a temporary site on the premises of Kjeller Airport in Skedsmo. [1] A new, tailor-made structure was opened within the military perimeter of the airport in May 2001. Designed by Knut Longva, it features both offices and a hangar measuring 24 by 25 m (79 by 82 ft). [14]

Rail and road

Meanwhile, the government started looking at expanding the agency's role. While these commissions had technical competence, their transient nature caused them to not be sufficient methodological in their investigations. Creating a permanent staff and a larger specialist environment was seen as a way to allow for better investigation and reporting. [8] Particularly two accidents were pinnacle to this move, the sinking of MS Sleipner and the Åsta accident, which killed 16 and 19 people, respectively. Although the government wanted to include all modes of transport, legal and practical reasons caused the railway sector to be the first to be included. [15]

The agency took over responsibility for investigating railway accidents from 1 January 2002. It simultaneously took the name Accident Investigation Board for Civil Aviation and Railways (Havarikommisjonen for sivil luftfart og jernbane, HSLB). At the time, the agency investigated about 100 to 150 aviation accidents and incidents per year and about 60 railway accidents and incidents per year. [8]

The next expansion involved road traffic accidents, taking effect on 1 September 2005. [16] Unlike in aviation and railway accidents, only a select few road accidents were to be investigated. These were selected based on their ability to provide useful information to improve road safety. In particular bus and truck accidents were prioritized, along with tunnel accidents and ones with dangerous goods. The agency initially hired four investigations and aimed at them investigating twenty to twenty-five accidents per year. This comprised 3.4 million Norwegian krone of the agency's 31.8 million budget. One advantage of the agency was that it could allow for protected testimonies, without these having to be subject to criminal investigation by the Norwegian Police Service. [17] The agency thereby took its current name. [1] Meanwhile, the Norwegian Public Roads Administration established a group of regional offices to investigate other accidents and aggregate information from these. [18]

During this period, discussions also arose as to whether the board should investigate cases related to pipelines and accidents on oil platforms. This discussion came from the mandate of the United States' National Transportation Safety Board, which had such authority. [16]

Marine expansion

In particular, the investigations of MS Scandinavian Star, MS Estonia, and MS Jan Heweliusz during the 1990s caused a questioning of the quality of marine accident investigations, and the other Nordic countries established marine investigation boards during that decade. Work on reforming the marine system started in 1998, and resulted in a committee recommending the system be scrapped in favor of an accident investigation board. The prime reason was that the Institute of Maritime Enquiry was regarded as having insufficient competence to investigate major accidents. Also, some concerns were that the system mixed the criminal prosecution and the safety investigation aspects, which could hinder a proper learning to take place from an accident. [2] The system used court interviews with witnesses, while owners, insurance companies, and press were present. Facing both legal and economic consequences, witnesses would often give testimonies of reduced accuracy, hindering proper investigation from a safety point of view. [19]

Initially, the committee proposed an independent investigation board for the maritime sector, either as part of the Norwegian Maritime Authority or as an independent agency subordinate to the Ministry of Justice. [20] During the political discussions a joint board was favored instead. [8] Parliament approved the new jurisdiction in 2004. However, it took four years to implement the decision, and nine years from the conclusions of the committee were presented. The delays were caused by the legal implications and complexity of the investigations. Because the board was only to investigate from a safety point of view, a new legal and administrative framework had to be implemented to ensure that the Norwegian Police Service could take over the responsibility for criminal investigation of the marine accidents. [21]

The changes took effect on 1 July 2008. In addition to the investigation aspect, which was issued to the board, the Maritime Authority established a division to work with strategic safety. Criminal investigation of marine accidents became the responsibility of an office at Rogaland Police District. [19]

Defense sector expansion

In 2020, the AIBN's mandate was expanded to also include investigation of accidents and serious incidents in the defence sector, and the Defence Accident Investigation Board Norway was dissolved. [22]

Mandate

The Accident Investigation Board Norway is a government agency subordinate to the Ministry of Transport and Communications. In questions related to maritime safety, it reports to the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Fisheries. Neither ministry can instruct the board in professional matters. The agency is mandated to investigate transport-related accidents and incident within the scope of aviation, maritime, rail transport, and road transport. The board's responsibility is to determine which accidents and incidents are to be investigated, and the scope and scale of any investigations. This is a trade-off between use of resources and the perceived safety benefits from further inquiries. [23]

AIBN's goal is exclusively to look into the safety aspects of accidents, with the overall goal to uncover causes and the line of events so as to learn, improve safety, and hinder similar accidents from happening again. The board is not involved in any assessment of blame or liability, whether under criminal or civil law. [23] Criminal investigation is carried out by the Norwegian Police Service and prosecution by the Norwegian Prosecuting Authority. In particular, the board can accept testimonies, which can remain anonymous and will under no circumstances be handed over to the police or prosecuting authorities. [24] The board's responsibilities are delineated towards those of the Police Service and the Prosecution Authority, as well as those of the Civil Aviation Authority of Norway, the Norwegian Maritime Authority, the Norwegian Public Roads Administration, and the Norwegian Railway Authority. [23]

Aviation accidents are mandated through the Aviation Act of 11 June 1993, which again references Council Directive 94/56/EC of 21 November 1994. This includes all aviation accidents, as well as serious incidents. [23]

Marine accidents and incident investigation is based on the Norwegian Maritime Code of 24 June 1994. This is again based on obligationsand requirements stipulated under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. [23] This includes all accidents with passenger ships and other large Norwegian vessels, in which people have or are assumed to have lost lives or been substantially injured. AIBN may also investigate foreign ships in cases where Norwegian jurisdiction can be applied under international law. AIBN may also investigate accidents with recreational boats if such an inquiry is presumed to improve safety at sea. [25]

Rail accident and incident investigation has its legal basis in the Railway Investigation Act of 3 June 2005. [23] This is again a national incorporation of the European Union's Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC. The responsibility includes both mainline railways, tramways and rapid transit, but not funiculars. [26]

Road accident investigation is based on the Road Traffic Act of 18 June 1965. [23] AIBN has no legal obligation to investigate any specific road accidents, although it is to be informed of any accidents involving buses and heavy trucks, and accidents in tunnels and those involving dangerous goods. AIBN then makes the call as to whether to investigate the matter, based on the assessment of if an investigation can further road traffic safety. [27]

Related Research Articles

National Transportation Safety Board US government investigative agency for civil transportation accidents

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is an independent U.S. government investigative agency responsible for civil transportation accident investigation. In this role, the NTSB investigates and reports on aviation accidents and incidents, certain types of highway crashes, ship and marine accidents, pipeline incidents, bridge failures, and railroad accidents. The NTSB is also in charge of investigating cases of hazardous materials releases that occur during transportation. The agency is based in Washington, D.C. It has four regional offices, located in Anchorage, Alaska; Denver, Colorado; Ashburn, Virginia; and Seattle, Washington. The agency also operates a national training center at its Ashburn facility.

Aviation accidents and incidents Aviation occurrence involving serious injury, death, or destruction of aircraft

An aviation accident is defined by the Convention on International Civil Aviation Annex 13 as an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft, which takes place from the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight until all such persons have disembarked, and in which a) a person is fatally or seriously injured, b) the aircraft sustains significant damage or structural failure, or c) the aircraft goes missing or becomes completely inaccessible. Annex 13 defines an aviation incident as an occurrence, other than an accident, associated with the operation of an aircraft that affects or could affect the safety of operation.

Transport Canada Canadian agency that regulates transportation

Transport Canada is the department within the Government of Canada responsible for developing regulations, policies and services of road, rail, marine and air transportation in Canada. It is part of the Transportation, Infrastructure and Communities (TIC) portfolio. The current Minister of Transport is Omar Alghabra. Transport Canada is headquartered in Ottawa, Ontario.

Transportation Safety Board of Canada Agency of the Government of Canada

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada, officially the Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board is the agency of the Government of Canada responsible for advancing transportation safety in Canada. It is accountable to Parliament directly through the President of the Queen’s Privy Council and the Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade. The independent agency investigates accidents and makes safety recommendations in four modes of transportation: aviation, rail, marine and pipelines.

The Te Manatū WakaMinistry of Transport is the public service department of New Zealand charged with advising the government on transport policy.

Australian Transport Safety Bureau

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) is Australia's national transport safety investigator. The ATSB is the federal government body responsible for investigating transport-related accidents and incidents within Australia. It covers air, sea and rail travel. The ATSB is an independent Commonwealth Government statutory agency, governed by a Commission and is separate from transport regulators, policy makers and service providers.

Transport Accident Investigation Commission

The Transport Accident Investigation Commission is a transport safety body of New Zealand. It has its headquarters on the 16th floor of the AXA Centre in Wellington. The agency investigates aviation, marine, and rail accidents and incidents occurring in New Zealand. It does not investigate road accidents except where they affect the safety of aviation, marine, or rail.

Atlantic Airways Flight 670 2006 aviation accident

Atlantic Airways Flight 670 was a crash following a runway overrun of a British Aerospace 146-200A at 07:32 on 10 October 2006 at Stord Airport, Sørstokken, Norway. The aircraft's spoilers failed to deploy, causing inefficient braking. The Atlantic Airways aircraft fell down the steep cliff at the end of the runway at slow speed and burst into flames, killing four of sixteen people on board.

The Royal Norwegian Ministry of Transportation is a Norwegian ministry established in 1946, and is responsible for transportation in Norway. The ministry was responsible for communication infrastructure until may 2019, when the responsibility for the Norwegian Communications Authority was transferred to Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development. Since January 2020, the ministry is led by Knut Arild Hareide. The department must report to the parliament (Stortinget).

Widerøe Flight 933 1982 aviation accident, Norwegian DHC-6

Widerøe Flight 933, also known as the Mehamn Accident, was the crash of a de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter operated by Norwegian airline Widerøe. The Twin Otter crashed into the Barents Sea off Gamvik, Norway on 11 March 1982 at 13:27, killing all fifteen people on board. The results of the four official investigations were that the accident was caused by structural failure of the vertical stabilizer during clear-air turbulence. A mechanical fault in the elevator control system caused the pilots to lose control of pitch; and either a series of stalls or a high-speed gust of wind caused the aircraft to lose altitude without the ability of the crew to counteract, resulting in the failure of the vertical stabilizer.

Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport

Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport, is a Federal Public Service of Belgium.

Widerøe Flight 710 1988 passenger plane crash on the island of Torghatten, Brønnøy, Norway

Widerøe Flight 710, commonly known as the Torghatten Accident, was a controlled flight into terrain into the mountain of Torghatten in Brønnøy, Norway. The Widerøe-operated de Havilland Canada Dash 7 crashed on 6 May 1988 at 20:29:30 during approach to Brønnøysund Airport, Brønnøy. All thirty-six people on board LN-WFN were killed; the crash remains the deadliest accident involving the Dash 7 and the deadliest in Northern Norway. The direct cause of the accident was that the aircraft had descended from 500 meters to 170 meters (1,500–550 ft) at 8 NM instead of 4 NM from the airport.

Federal Air Transport Agency Russian aviation administration

The Federal Air Transport Agency, also known as Rosaviatsiya, or FATA, is the Russian government agency responsible for overseeing the civil aviation industry in Russia. Its headquarters are in Moscow.

Widerøe Flight 839 1990 aviation accident

Widerøe Flight 839, also known as the Værøy Accident, was a de Havilland Canada DHC-6-300 Twin Otter that crashed shortly after take-off from Værøy Airport in Norway. The incident occurred on 12 April 1990 at 14:44, killing all five people on board. The cause of the accident were strong winds that exceeded the structure's tolerance, causing the tail rudder and tailplane to crack so the plane became uncontrollable. Impact occurred 63 seconds after take-off and 8 seconds after the crack. The aircraft crashed into the water, and a search was conducted for several days to find the wreck.

The Korea Aviation Accident Investigation Board was a South Korean agency that investigated aviation accidents and incidents. Around 2005 its headquarters were in Gonghang-dong, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, near Gimpo International Airport, and its flight data recorder/cockpit voice recorder and wreckage laboratory was located on the property of Gimpo Airport. Around 2004 it had been headquartered in Gwacheon, Gyeonggi-do.

Widerøe Flight 744 1993 aviation accident

Widerøe Flight 744, also known as the Namsos Accident, was a controlled flight into terrain of a de Havilland Canada DHC-6-300 Twin Otter during approach to Namsos Airport, Høknesøra in Norway. The incident occurred on 27 October 1993 at 19:16:48 and killed six of the nineteen people on board, including the crew of two. The scheduled flight was en route between Trondheim Airport, Værnes via Namsos to Rørvik Airport, Ryum and the aircraft crashed at Berg in Overhalla because it held too low an altitude.

The Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board is an agency of the South Korean government that investigates aviation and railway accidents, subservient to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) and headquartered in Sejong City.

Ministry of Transport (Malaysia)

The Ministry of Transport, abbreviated MOT, is a ministry of the Government of Malaysia that is responsible for transport: road transport, civil aviation, marine, road safety, port authority, railway assets, maritime, air accident investigation, logistic, maritime safety, shipping, rail transport, airport, airline.

CHC Helikopter Service Flight 241 Fatal crash landing in Norway

On 29 April 2016, a CHC Helikopter Service Eurocopter EC225 Super Puma helicopter, carrying oil workers from the Gullfaks B platform in the North Sea, crashed near Turøy, a Norwegian coastal island 36 kilometres (22 mi) from the city of Bergen. The main rotor assembly detached from the aircraft and the fuselage plummeted to the ground, exploding on impact. All thirteen people on board were killed.

The European Network of Civil Aviation Safety Investigation Authorities (ENCASIA) is a network of civil aviation accident investigation authorities of the European Union.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "About us". Accident Investigation Board Norway. Archived from the original on 31 March 2015. Retrieved 13 September 2015.
  2. 1 2 Damsgaard, Eirik (22 July 1999). "Vil ha ny sjøhavarikommisjon". Bergens Tidende (in Norwegian). p. 4.
  3. ↑ Lønna, Elina (30 January 2004). "Sjøforklaring er ikke bra nok". Klassekampen (in Norwegian).
  4. ↑ Nordstrand, Ingemar (2006). "Havørn-ulukka som skaka fly-Noreg i 1936". Årbok for Sogn (in Norwegian). Kaupanger: Historielaget for Sogn/Sogn Folk Museum. 52: 87. ISBN   82-91653-11-9.
  5. 1 2 3 Malmø, Morten (1997). Norge på vingene! (in Norwegian). Oslo: Adante Forlag. p. 118. ISBN   82-91056-13-7.
  6. 1 2 3 Larsen, Rolf L. (12 July 1988). "Ny flyhavarikommisjon uten politi?". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). p. 4.
  7. ↑ "Forbereder felles ulykkeskommisjon for fly og tog" (in Norwegian). Norwegian News Agency. 10 January 2001.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 "Skal granske jernbaneulykker" (in Norwegian). Norwegian News Agency. 28 December 2001.
  9. ↑ Guhnfeldt, Cato (22 October 1988). "Ny statsetat for flysikkerhet". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). p. 22.
  10. 1 2 "Havarikommisjonen blir forvaltningsorgan" (in Norwegian). Norwegian News Agency. 19 March 1999.
  11. ↑ Christiansen, Pernille Lønne (10 January 1989). "Rygnestad ble ny flyhavarileder". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). p. 5.
  12. ↑ Guhnfeldt, Cato (17 June 1989). "Overarbeidet flyhavarikommisjon". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). p. 11.
  13. ↑ Guhnfeldt, Cato (12 May 1989). "Større krav til flysikkerhet". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). p. 4.
  14. 1 2 "Klart for gransking". Teknisk Ukeblad (in Norwegian). 11 May 2001.
  15. ↑ Storvik, Olav Tryggve (15 November 2000). "Felles ulykkeskommisjon for hele transportsektoren". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). p. 4.
  16. 1 2 Helgesen, Jan-Petter (26 September 2005). "Havarikommisjonen får ansvar for skipsulykker". Stavanger Aftenblad (in Norwegian). p. 5.
  17. ↑ Hattrem, Hanne (10 April 2005). "Gransker ikke personbilulykker". Verdens Gang (in Norwegian). p. 59.
  18. ↑ "Vil opprette lokale grupper". Verdens Gang (in Norwegian). 12 October 2003. p. 19.
  19. 1 2 Førde, Thomas (7 February 2008). "Skal granske sjøulykker". Stavanger Aftenblad (in Norwegian). p. 31.
  20. ↑ Bø, Trond (4 December 1999). "Sjøhavarikommisjon klar i 2001". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). p. 2.
  21. ↑ Strande, Mona (27 March 2008). "Store endringer ved sjøulykker". Teknisk Ukeblad (in Norwegian).
  22. ↑ "About us | nsia".
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Directive for the Accident Investigation Board Norway". Accident Investigation Board Norway. Archived from the original on 14 September 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
  24. ↑ Bjørnbakk, Jan Morten (27 August 2005). "Havarikommisjon med taushetsplikt" (in Norwegian). Norwegian News Agency.
  25. ↑ "Marine". Accident Investigation Board Norway. Archived from the original on 12 September 2015. Retrieved 14 September 2015.
  26. ↑ "Railway". Accident Investigation Board Norway. Archived from the original on 12 September 2015. Retrieved 14 September 2015.
  27. ↑ "Road Traffic". Accident Investigation Board Norway. Archived from the original on 12 September 2015. Retrieved 14 September 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.