Tier 1 network

Last updated

A Tier 1 network is an Internet Protocol (IP) network that can reach every other network on the Internet solely via settlement-free interconnection (also known as settlement-free peering). [1] [2] Tier 1 networks can exchange traffic with other Tier 1 networks without having to pay any fees for the exchange of traffic in either direction, [3] while some Tier 2 networks and all Tier 3 networks must pay to transmit traffic on other networks. [3]

Contents

Relationship between the various tiers of Internet providers Internet Connectivity Distribution & Core.svg
Relationship between the various tiers of Internet providers

There is no authority that defines tiers of networks participating in the Internet. [1] The most common and well-accepted definition of a Tier 1 network is a network that can reach every other network on the Internet without purchasing IP transit or paying for peering. [2] By this definition, a Tier 1 network must be a transit-free network (purchases no transit) that peers for free with every other Tier 1 network and can reach all major networks on the Internet. Not all transit-free networks are Tier 1 networks, as it is possible to become transit-free by paying for peering, and it is also possible to be transit-free without being able to reach all major networks on the Internet.

The most widely quoted source for identifying Tier 1 networks is published by Renesys Corporation, [4] but the base information to prove the claim is publicly accessible from many locations, such as the RIPE RIS database, [5] the Oregon Route Views servers, Packet Clearing House, and others.

It can be difficult to determine whether a network is paying for peering or transit, as these business agreements are rarely public information, or are covered under a non-disclosure agreement. The Internet peering community is roughly the set of peering coordinators present at the Internet exchange points on more than one continent. The subset representing Tier 1 networks is collectively understood in a loose sense, but not published as such.

Common definitions of Tier 2 and Tier 3 networks:

History

The original Internet backbone was the ARPANET when it provided the routing between most participating networks. The development of the British JANET (1984) and U.S. NSFNET (1985) infrastructure programs to serve their nations' higher education communities, regardless of discipline, [6] resulted in 1989 with the NSFNet backbone. The Internet could be defined as the collection of all networks connected and able to interchange Internet Protocol datagrams with this backbone. Such was the weight of the NSFNET program and its funding ($200 million from 1986 to 1995)—and the quality of the protocols themselves—that by 1990 when the ARPANET itself was finally decommissioned, TCP/IP had supplanted or marginalized most other wide-area computer network protocols worldwide.

When the Internet was opened to the commercial markets, multiple for-profit Internet backbone and access providers emerged. The network routing architecture then became decentralized and attained a need for exterior routing protocols, in particular the Border Gateway Protocol emerged. New Tier 1 ISPs and their peering agreements supplanted the government-sponsored NSFNet, a program that was officially terminated on April 30, 1995. [6] The NSFnet-supplied regional networks then sought to buy national-scale Internet connectivity from these now numerous, private, long-haul networks.

Routing through peering

A bilateral private peering agreement typically involves a direct physical link between two partners. Traffic from one network to the other is then primarily routed through that direct link.

A Tier 1 network may have various such links to other Tier 1 networks. Peering is founded on the principle of equality of traffic between the partners and as such disagreements may arise between partners in which usually one of the partners unilaterally disconnects the link in order to force the other into a payment scheme. Such disruptive de-peering has happened several times during the first decade of the 21st century. When this involves large-scale networks involving many millions of customers this may effectively partition a part of the Internet involving those carriers, especially if they decide to disallow routing through alternate routes. This is not largely a technical issue but a commercial matter in which a financial dispute is fought out using the other party's customers as hostages to obtain a better negotiating position. In the worst case, single-homed customers of each network will not be able to reach the other network at all. The de-peering party then hopes that the other network's customers will be hurt more by the decision than its own customers which may eventually conclude the negotiations in its favor. [7] [8] Lower tier ISPs and other parties not involved in the dispute may be unaffected by such a partition as there exist typically multiple routes onto the same network. The disputes referenced have also typically involved transit-free peering in which one player only exchanged data with the other that involved each other's networks—there was no data transiting through the other's network destined for other parts of the Internet. By the strict definition of peering and the strict definition of a Tier 1 network, a Tier 1 network only peers with other Tier 1 networks and has no transit routes going anywhere. More practically speaking, Tier 1 networks serve as transit networks for lower tier networks and only peer with other Tier 1 networks that offer the same services on an adequate scale—effectively being "peers" in the truest sense of the word. [9]

More appropriately then, peering means the exchange of an equitable and fair amount of data-miles between two networks, agreements of which do not preclude any pay-for-transit contracts to exist between the very same parties. On the subject of routing, settlement-free peering involves conditions disallowing the abuse of the other's network by sending it traffic not destined for that network (i.e. intended for transit). Transit agreements however would typically cater for just such outbound packets. Tier 1 providers are more central to the Internet backbone and would only purchase transit from other Tier 1 providers, while selling transit to providers of all tiers. Given their huge networks, Tier 1 providers do not participate in public Internet Exchanges[ citation needed ] but rather sell transit services to such participants.

In the most logical definition, a Tier 1 provider will never pay for transit because the set of all Tier 1 providers sells transit to all of the lower tier providers everywhere, and because

(a) all Tier 1 providers peer with every other Tier 1 provider globally and,

(b) the peering agreement allows access to all of the transit customers, this means that

(c) the Tier 1 network contains all hosts everywhere that are connected to the global Internet.

As such, by the peering agreement, all the customers of any Tier 1 provider already have access to all the customers of all the other Tier 1 providers without the Tier 1 provider itself having to pay transit costs to the other networks. Effectively, the actual transit costs incurred by provider A on behalf of provider B are logically identical to the transit costs incurred by provider B on behalf of provider A—hence there not being any payment required.

List of Tier 1 networks

These networks are universally recognized as Tier 1 networks, because they can reach the entire internet (IPv4 and IPv6) via settlement free peering. The CAIDA AS Rank is a rank of importance on the internet. [10]

NameHeadquarters AS number CAIDA AS Rank [10] Fiber Route MilesFiber Route kmPeering Policy
AT&T [11] United States 701821410,000660,000 [12] AT&T Peering policy
CenturyLink (formerly Level 3) [13] [14] United States 33561750,000885,139 [15] [16] North America; International

Level 3 Peering Policy

CenturyLink (formerly Level 3 formerly Global Crossing) [13] [14] United States 354913750,000885,139 [15] [16] North America; International

Level 3 Peering Policy

Deutsche Telekom Global Carrier [17] Germany 332020155,343250,000 [18] DTAG Peering Details
GTT Communications, Inc. United States 32574144,738232,934 [19] [20] GTT Peering Policy
Liberty Global [21] [22] United Kingdom [23] 683027500,000800,000 [24] Peering Principles
NTT Ltd. (formerly Verio) [25] United Kingdom 29146?? Global Peering Policy
Orange (OpenTransit) [26] France 551116?? OTI peering policy
PCCW Global Hong Kong 349111?? Peering policy
Sprint (T-mobile) [27] United States 12393326,00042,000 [28] Peering policy
Tata Communications (formerly Teleglobe) [29] India 64537435,000700,000 [30] Peering Policy
Telecom Italia Sparkle (Seabone) [31] Italy 67625347,967560,000 Peering Policy
Telxius (Subsidiary of Telefónica) [32] Spain 129561740,00065,000 [33] Peering Policy
Telia Carrier [34] Sweden 1299240,00065,000 [35] TeliaSonera International Carrier Global Peering Policy
Verizon Enterprise Solutions (formerly UUNET) [40] United States 70119500,000805,000 [41] Verizon UUNET Peering policy 701, 702, 703
Zayo Group (formerly AboveNet) [42] United States 64619122,000196,339 [43] Zayo Peering Policy
Cogent Communications [44] United States 174394,400151,922 [45] Bilateral negotiations
Note: No IPv6 routes to Google/AS15169 nor Hurricane Electric/AS6939. This doesn't make Cogent Tier-2 as content-heavy networks are supposed to purchase IP transit or paid peering to reach eyeball networks. [46] [47]

While most of these Tier 1 providers offer global coverage (based on the published network map on their respective public websites), there are some which are restricted geographically. However these do offer global coverage for mobiles and IP-VPN type services which are unrelated to being a Tier 1 provider.

A 2008 report shows Internet traffic relying less on U.S. networks than previously. [48]

Regional Tier 1 networks

A common point of contention regarding Tier 1 networks is the concept of a regional Tier 1 network. A regional Tier 1 network is a network which is not transit free globally, but which maintains many of the classic behaviors and motivations of a Tier 1 network within a specific region.

A typical scenario for this characteristic involves a network that was the incumbent telecommunications company in a specific country or region, usually tied to some level of government-supported monopoly. Within their specific countries or regions of origin, these networks maintain peering policies which mimic those of Tier 1 networks (such as lack of openness to new peering relationships and having existing peering with every other major network in that region). However, this network may then extend to another country, region, or continent outside of its core region of operations, where it may purchase transit or peer openly like a Tier 2 network.

A commonly cited example of these behaviors involves the incumbent carriers within Australia, who will not peer with new networks in Australia under any circumstances, but who will extend their networks to the United States and peer openly with many networks.[ citation needed ] Less extreme examples of much less restrictive peering requirements being set for regions in which a network peers, but does not sell services or have a significant market share, are relatively common among many networks, not just regional Tier 1 networks.

While the classification regional Tier 1 holds some merit for understanding the peering motivations of such a network within different regions, these networks do not meet the requirements of a true global Tier 1 because they are not transit free globally. [49]

Other major networks

This is a list of networks that are often considered and close to the status of Tier 1, because they can reach the majority (50%+) of the internet via settlement free peering with their global rings. However, routes to one or more Tier 1 are missing or paid. Therefore they are technically Tier 2, though practically something in between.

NameHeadquarters AS Number CAIDA AS Rank [10] Reason
Comcast United States 792228Network limited to the US; Purchases transit from Tata/AS6453, otherwise full reach via peering
Hurricane Electric [50] United States 69398IPv4: Purchases transit from Telia/AS1299 to reach NTT/AS2914, Cogent/AS174, and Tata/AS6453
IPv6: Lack of peering with Cogent/AS174. [51] [52]
RETN United Kingdom 900212Purchases transit from Level 3
Vodafone Carrier Services
(formerly Cable & Wireless)
United Kingdom 127310Purchases transit from Telia Carrier/AS1299 to reach AT&T/AS7018. [53]
Verizon Enterprise Solutions
(formerly XO Communications) [58]
United States 282833IPv6: Purchases transit from Sprint/AS1239 to reach Vodafone (CW)/AS1273 and Telecom Italia Sparkle (Seabone).
China Telecom China 4134118Purchases transit from Verizon
China Unicom China 483786Purchases transit from Level 3

See also

Related Research Articles

Internet Global system of connected computer networks

The Internet is the global system of interconnected computer networks that uses the Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP) to communicate between networks and devices. It is a network of networks that consists of private, public, academic, business, and government networks of local to global scope, linked by a broad array of electronic, wireless, and optical networking technologies. The Internet carries a vast range of information resources and services, such as the inter-linked hypertext documents and applications of the World Wide Web (WWW), electronic mail, telephony, and file sharing.

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is a standardized exterior gateway protocol designed to exchange routing and reachability information among autonomous systems (AS) on the Internet. BGP is classified as a path-vector routing protocol, and it makes routing decisions based on paths, network policies, or rule-sets configured by a network administrator.

In computer networking, peering is a voluntary interconnection of administratively separate Internet networks for the purpose of exchanging traffic between the users of each network. The pure definition of peering is settlement-free, also known as "bill-and-keep," or "sender keeps all," meaning that neither party pays the other in association with the exchange of traffic; instead, each derives and retains revenue from its own customers.

Internet backbone Vital infrastructure of the networks of the Internet

The Internet backbone may be defined by the principal data routes between large, strategically interconnected computer networks and core routers of the Internet. These data routes are hosted by commercial, government, academic and other high-capacity network centers, as well as the Internet exchange points and network access points, that exchange Internet traffic between the countries, continents, and across the oceans. Internet service providers, often Tier 1 networks, participate in Internet backbone traffic by privately negotiated interconnection agreements, primarily governed by the principle of settlement-free peering.

Internet exchange point Internet infrastructure through which ISPs exchange traffic

An Internet exchange point is the physical infrastructure through which Internet service providers (ISPs) and content delivery networks (CDNs) exchange Internet traffic between their networks.

MAE-East was an Internet Exchange Point spread across the east coast of the United States, with locations in Vienna, Virginia; Reston, Virginia; Ashburn, Virginia; New York, New York; and Miami, Florida. It was the eastern branch of the MCI Internet Exchange. Its name officially stood for "Metropolitan Area Exchange, East".

Level 3 Communications was an American multinational telecommunications and Internet service provider company headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado. It ultimately became a part of CenturyLink, where Level 3 President and CEO Jeff Storey was installed as Chief Operating Officer, becoming CEO of CenturyLink one year later in a prearranged succession plan.

Tier 2 network Internet service provider leasing connectivity from one or more primary ("Tier 1") ISPs

A Tier 2 network is an Internet service provider which engages in the practice of peering with other networks, but which also purchases IP transit to reach some portion of the Internet.

Cogent Communications company

Cogent Communications is a multinational internet service provider based in the United States. Cogent's primary services consist of Internet access and data transport, offered on a fiber optic, IP data-only network, along with colocation in data centers.

Internet transit Service of allowing network traffic to cross or "transit" a computer network, typically providing internet service to downstream networks.

Internet transit is the service of allowing network traffic to cross or "transit" a computer network, usually used to connect a smaller Internet service provider (ISP) to the larger Internet. Technically, it consists of two bundled services:

Toronto Internet Exchange

The Toronto Internet Exchange Community (TorIX) is a not-for-profit Internet Exchange Point (IXP) located in a carrier hotel at 151 Front Street West, Equinix's TR2 data centre at 45 Parliament Street and 905 King Street West in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. As of February 2020, TorIX has 247 unique autonomous systems representing 272 peer connections and peak traffic rates of 1,089 Gbit/s, making it the largest IXP in Canada. According to Wikipedia's List of Internet Exchange Points by Size, TorIX is the 16th largest IXP in the world in numbers of peers, and 17th in the world in traffic averages. The Exchange is organized and run by industry professionals in voluntary capacity.

In Internet routing, the default-free zone (DFZ) is the collection of all Internet autonomous systems (AS) that do not require a default route to route a packet to any destination. Conceptually, DFZ routers have a "complete" Border Gateway Protocol table, sometimes referred to as the Internet routing table, global routing table or global BGP table. However, internet routing changes rapidly and the widespread use of route filtering ensures that no router has a complete view of all routes. Any routing table created would look different from the perspective of different routers, even if a stable view could be achieved.

PacketExchange was a British multinational network services provider based in London. Founded in 2002 its network connected 45 points of presence across Europe, Asia and the United States over a private backbone consisting primarily of multiple 10 Gigabit Ethernet links over dedicated wavelengths on a fiber-optic mesh.

In the context of network routing, route filtering is the process by which certain routes are not considered for inclusion in the local route database, or not advertised to one's neighbours. Route filtering is particularly important for the Border Gateway Protocol on the global Internet, where it is used for a variety of reasons. One way of doing route filtering with external-resources in practice is using Routing Policy Specification Language in combination with Internet Routing Registry databases.

Deployment of Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), the next generation of the Internet Protocol, has been in progress since the mid-2000s.

Hurricane Electric is a global Internet service provider offering IPv4 and IPv6 Internet access, transit, tools, and network applications, as well as data center colocation and hosting services in San Jose, California, and in Fremont, California, where the company is based.

Net bias is the counter-principle to net neutrality, which indicates differentiation or discrimination of price and the quality of content or applications on the Internet by ISPs. Similar terms include data discrimination and network management.

Internet rush hour is the time period when the majority of Internet users are online at the same time. Typically, in the UK the peak hours are between 7 and 11 pm. During this time frame, users commonly experience slowness while browsing or downloading content. The congestion experienced during the rush hour is similar to transportation rush hour, where demand for resources outweighs capacity.

GTT Communications Tier 1 Internet service provider

GTT Communications, Inc. (GTT), formerly Global Telecom and Technology, is a multinational telecommunications and internet service provider company with headquarters in Tysons, Virginia, and incorporated in Delaware. GTT operates a Tier 1 IP network, and provides transport and infrastructure; Internet; wide area networking, SD-WAN; managed services; and voice and video services.

Grenoble Internet eXchange or GrenoblIX is the Internet eXchange point (IXP) of Grenoble in Isère and Auvergne – Rhône-Alpes region. GrenoblIX allows to the connected members to exchange the traffic in order to avoid passing by faraway infrastructures. This Internet eXchange point is managed by the non-profit organization Rezopole, founded in 2001.

References

  1. 1 2 Winther, Mark (May 2006). "Tier1 ISPs: What They Are and Why They Are Important" (PDF). NTT America Corporate.
  2. 1 2 "How the 'Net works: an introduction to peering and transit: Page 4". 2008-09-02. Retrieved 2008-11-04. Tier 1 networks are those networks that don't pay any other network for transit yet still can reach all networks connected to the internet.
  3. 1 2 "Definition of: Tier 1 network". pcmag.com. Retrieved 2018-08-10.
  4. http://renesys.com/ Renesys Corporation
  5. RIPE RIS database
  6. 1 2 "Brief History of the Internet". Internet Society. Retrieved 2019-01-22.
  7. "You can't get there from here". 2008-03-17. Retrieved 2014-05-11. Cogent and Telia are having a lover’s quarrel and, as a result, the Internet is partitioned. That means customers of Cogent and Telia cannot necessarily reach one another.
  8. "'Peering' Into AOL-MSN Outage". 2003-09-05. Retrieved 2014-05-11. Some industry watchers believe the problem shows signs of dispute over peering agreements—deals between Internet service providers to create a direct link to route each other's packets rather than pay a third-party network service provider for transport.
  9. "Level 3 IP traffic exchange policy" . Retrieved 2014-05-11. Must provide paid Internet transit services to at least 500 unique transit networks utilizing BGP on a global basis.
  10. 1 2 3 CAIDA AS Rank
  11. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  12. http://www.att.com/gen/general?pid=7462
  13. 1 2 "CenturyLink completes acquisition of Level 3". MediaRoom. Retrieved 2019-01-22.
  14. 1 2 "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  15. 1 2 Inc, CenturyLink. "CenturyLink completes largest deployment of G.fast technology in North America". www.prnewswire.com. Retrieved 2019-01-22.
  16. 1 2 http://www.level3.com/~/media/files/brochures/en_dataserv_br_secureinternetservices.pdf
  17. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  18. "Internet and Contents".
  19. https://www.gtt.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/GTT-Investor-Presentation-February-2017.pdf
  20. "GTT Buys Interoute for $2.3 Billion to Gain Europe Fiber Network". BloombergQuint. Retrieved 2019-02-05.
  21. "AS6830 IPv4 route propagation". 2016-11-09. Retrieved 2016-11-09.
  22. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-11-15. Retrieved 2016-11-15.
  23. http://www.libertyglobal.com/about-us-contact-us.aspx
  24. "Liberty Global | largest international cable company". www.libertyglobal.com. Archived from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 15 August 2017.
  25. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  26. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  27. "Sprint and T-mobile Completion of Merger | Sprint Newsroom". newsroom.sprint.com. Retrieved 2020-09-03.
  28. https://www.sprint.com/business/resources/fts2001/rrg/section2.doc
  29. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  30. http://www.tatacommunications.com/glance/our-network
  31. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  32. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  33. http://telxius.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fichas_Telxius_Capacity-Services.pdf
  34. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  35. "Telia Carrier". Telia Carrier. Retrieved 2019-01-22.
  36. http://www.fiercetelecom.com/telecom/after-delay-verizon-wraps-1-8b-xo-acquisition-deepens-metro-fiber-density-45-markets
  37. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  38. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-07-30. Retrieved 2016-07-30.
  39. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-07-30. Retrieved 2016-07-30.
  40. [36] [37] [38] [39]
  41. "When you need quality, reliability and a global presence, trust Verizon Partner Solutions for all of your VOICE SERVICES requirements". www22.verizon.com. Retrieved 2019-01-22.
  42. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  43. "Network Solutions Provider - Dark Fiber Network". Zayo Group. Retrieved 2019-01-22.
  44. "Caida". caida.org. Retrieved 1 February 2018.
  45. "Cogent Network Map". CogentCo. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  46. "Cogent - Google - HE Fun". 2016-03-09.
  47. "No connectivity to Cogent IPv6 network". www.sixxs.net. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
  48. Markoff, John (2008-08-30). "Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the US". New York Times.
  49. "Who are the Tier 1 ISPs?". drpeering.net. Retrieved 2019-05-22.
  50. "Caida". caida.org. Retrieved 1 February 2018.
  51. "Peering Disputes Migrate to IPv6".
  52. "IPv6 internet broken, cogent/hurricane not peering".
  53. "AS1273 Cable and Wireless Worldwide plc - bgp.he.net". bgp.he.net. Retrieved 2019-11-03.
  54. http://www.fiercetelecom.com/telecom/after-delay-verizon-wraps-1-8b-xo-acquisition-deepens-metro-fiber-density-45-markets
  55. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-09-01. Retrieved 2016-09-01.
  56. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-07-30. Retrieved 2016-07-30.
  57. "CAIDA AS Rank". 2016-07-30. Retrieved 2016-07-30.
  58. [54] [55] [56] [57]