Turfanosuchus

Last updated

Turfanosuchus
Temporal range: Anisian
~247.2–242  Ma
Turfanosuchus skull views.jpg
Multiple views of the holotype skull of Turfanosuchus dabanensis
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Pseudosuchia
Clade: Suchia
Family: Gracilisuchidae
Genus: Turfanosuchus
Young, 1973
Species
  • T. dabanensisYoung, 1973 (type)

Turfanosuchus is a genus of archosauriform reptile, likely a gracilisuchid archosaur, which lived during the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of northwestern China. The type species, T. dabanensis, was described by C.C. Young in 1973, based on a partially complete but disarticulated fossil skeleton (IVPP V.32237) found in the Kelamayi Formation of the Turfan Basin. [1]

Contents

Turfanosuchus had a peculiar combination of features which has made it difficult to classify in the past. It possessed teeth on the palate, and internal carotid arteries which entered the braincase from below. These two traits were rare among Archosauria (true, crown-group archosaurs) and are more similar to non-archosaurian archosauriforms like Euparkeria . [2] On the other hand, the ankle was much more advanced than that of animals like Euparkeria, and some features of the skull have only been observed in true archosaurs, particularly early suchians (distant ancestors of modern crocodilians). [3] Out of this group, Turfanosuchus shares the most similarities with Gracilisuchus and Yonghesuchus , and a 2014 study grouped these three genera in the family Gracilisuchidae. Gracilisuchidae lies within Pseudosuchia, which contains all archosaurs more closely related to crocodilians than to birds. Some skull features previously considered unique to Turfanosuchus are now considered to characterize Gracilisuchidae, but Turfanosuchus retains a few unique features of the jaw and cheek region. [4]

Description

Skull

The skull of Turfanosuchus was proportionally similar to that of other small generalized archosauriforms such as Euparkeria and Gracilisuchus. The premaxilla (a toothed bone at the tip of the snout) projects a small prong behind the nares (nostril holes). This prong, known as a posterodorsal process, bisects a corresponding branch of the nasal bones (which formed the upper surface of the snout). [2] As with other archosaurs and their relatives, the side of the snout has a hole (known as an antorbital fenestra) surrounded by a lowered basin of bone (known as an antorbital fossa). The maxilla (the main toothed bone of the snout) also had a posterodorsal process, a much more rare trait compared to the posterodorsal process of the premaxilla (which was present in most archosauromorphs). The maxilla's posterodorsal process was a small, triangular peak of bone which formed the lower rear corner of the antorbital fossa and connected to the lacrimal bone (which lies between the antorbital fossa and the eye socket). [4]

These posterodorsal processes are very characteristic, either by bisecting the nasal (in the case of the premaxilla's) or existing in the first place (in the case of the maxilla's). As such, they were considered by Wu & Russell (2001) to be autapomorphies (unique distinguishing traits) of Turfanosuchus. [2] However, they are now both known to be present in Yonghesuchus and (to a lesser extent) Gracilisuchus, so they likely diagnose the entire family Gracilisuchidae, [4] or possibly even larger subsets of Archosauria. For example, the premaxillary posterodorsal process of Revueltosaurus also bisects its nasal, and a posterodorsal process of the maxilla is present in some aetosaurs and poposauroids. [3]

The premaxilla probably had five teeth, while the maxilla had at least 13. Preserved teeth were curved and finely serrated. [2] The nasal bones project over the side of the snout and form the upper border of the antorbital fossa. The frontal bones (which form the portion of the skull above the eye sockets) wedge into the nasals as a large, V-shaped suture. Both of these traits are also present in Gracilisuchus. [4] The shape of the jugal (cheek bone), on the other hand, is truly unique to Turfanosuchus. The portion of the jugal which rises behind the eye socket has a very wide base, and its surface is set inwards relative to the portion below the eye socket. [2] As with other diapsids, Turfanosuchus had a pair of openings at the rear portion of the skull known as temporal fenestra. The bone separating the two holes, the squamosal, had a lower branch which curved forwards to contact the jugal and divide the lower temporal fenestra into two separate holes, leaving three holes at the back of the skull in total. This trait is also known is rauisuchids such as Postosuchus . A similar situation is visible in other gracilisuchids, which have a broad contact between the jugal and the lower branch of the squamosal. However, they did not retain the upper portion of the lower temporal fenestra, leaving only a small, triangular remnant of the lower temporal fenestra under the squamosal-jugal contact. [4]

Preserved portions of the palate (roof of the mouth) were generally similar to Euparkeria. One particular similarity is the presence of teeth on the pterygoid bone. Traditionally, pterygoid teeth are considered to be absent in crown-archosaurs. Wu & Russell (2001) used this to justify classifying Turfanosuchus as a non-archosaur archosauriform. [2] However, more recently pterygoid teeth have been reported in crown-archosaurs such as Eoraptor, Eudimorphodon, Lewisuchus, [3] Eodromaeus , and Yonghesuchus. [4] Therefore, their presence in Turfanosuchus does not preclude its classification as a crown-archosaur. Another seemingly non-archosaurian trait reported in Turfanosuchus is the fact that its internal carotid arteries enter the braincase from below, rather than from the sides as in almost all other archosaurs (including Gracilisuchus and Yonghesuchus [4] ). However, this trait is also known to occur in other crown-archosaurs like Arizonasaurus , Qianosuchus , and Silesaurus. Otherwise, the braincase is generally similar to other archosaurs. [3]

The lower jaw was slender, with an elliptical hole known as a mandibular fenestra. The toothed dentary bone had two rear prongs surrounding the mandibular fenestra. Unique to Turfanosuchus among gracilisuchids, the lower prong was much longer than the upper prong. This had the added effect of excluding the angular bone (which formed the rear lower edge of the jaw) from forming the lower border of the mandibular fenestra. The surangular, which forms the upper rear portion of the jaw (and the upper border of the mandibular fenestra), was large. Another autapomorphy of Turfanosuchus is how the outer surface of the surangular was highly concave. [4] There were at least 16 teeth in the lower jaw, and they were similar in shape to those of the upper jaw. [2]

Postcranial skeleton

A sculpture of Turfanosuchus dabanensis, on display at the Paleozoological Museum of China. TurfanosuchusDabanensis-PaleozoologicalMuseumOfChina-May23-08.jpg
A sculpture of Turfanosuchus dabanensis, on display at the Paleozoological Museum of China.

The vertebrae of Turfanosuchus were similar to those of Euparkeria and pseudosuchians, with concavities on their sides and neural spines with expanded tops. There were two sacral (hip) vertebrae, which connected to the ilium (upper plate of the hip) with large, fan-shaped sacral ribs. No intercentra were preserved, and the vertebrae lacked bevelled edges, but since the vertebrae were disarticulated and some euparkeriids retain intercentra while lacking bevelled edges, their absence in Turfanosuchus cannot be proven. The ilium was similar to that of Ticinosuchus , with a short forward projection, a much larger rear projection, and a large bony acetabulum (hip socket). The pubis (lower front plate of the hip) was moderate in length and also similar to that of Ticinosuchus. Osteoderms (bony plates) were initially reported as being absent, but later preparation revealed one. This osteoderm was broad, with a ridge on its upper surface culminating in a pointed front prong. A corresponding groove-like depression was present on the lower surface. [2]

The humerus (upper arm bone) had a deltopectoral crest which was poorly differentiated from the humeral head. The femur (thigh bone) was similar to that of Euparkeria and most pseudosuchians, but it lacked the offset femoral head and raised fourth trochanter of avemetatarsalians or early crocodylomorphs. [2] The calcaneum (heel bone) had many similarities with that of "crurotarsan" archosauriforms (i.e. ones with a crurotarsal ankle like phytosaurs and suchians). These include a hemicylindrical (barrel-shaped) condyle for the fibula (outer shin bone), a continuous facet between this condyle and the facet for the fourth distal tarsal (a minor ankle bone), [2] and a rear projection known as a calcaneal tuber which was wider than tall and had flared edges. Some of these characteristics were not considered to be present until a re-evalutation of the specimen in 2011. [3]

Classification

Restoration Turfanosuchus NT.jpg
Restoration

The classification of Turfanosuchus has gone through much revision in the past due to its combination of features from both suchian archosaurs and earlier archosaur relatives such as Euparkeria. Young originally believed that the fossils came from an animal similar to Euparkeria , and assigned it to the family Euparkeriidae. The fossil, however, was not fully prepared. Subsequent analysis by Parrish in 1993 indicated that the fossils represented a suchian. A putative second species, "Turfanosuchus" shageduensis, was described in 1982. However, due to its large intercentra, this species is not considered to be a close relative of Turfanosuchus, and was likely an indeterminate euparkeriid related to Halazhaisuchus . [5]

In 2001, Xiao-Chun Wu (of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing) and Anthony Russell (of the University of Calgary) redescribed the fossil. Wu and Russell prepared the fossil, and noted the limb bones (femur and humerus) resembled those of Ticinosuchus and Euparkeria, though the calcaneum did not. Further preparation revealed a partial osteoderm. Wu and Russell concluded that Turfanosuchus was not a suchian nor even a member of the Pseudosuchia (archosaurs closer to crocodilians than to dinosaurs, also known as Crurotarsi in publications which include phytosaurs in the group). This conclusion was supported by features such as teeth on the palate and internal carotid arteries which entered the braincase from below, rather than from the side. However, they also ruled out the possibility of a close relationship with Euparkeria, noting several apomorphic ("advanced") features, such as a calcaneal tuber directed further backwards. [2]

In 2010, paleontologists Martín Ezcurra, Agustina Lecuona, and Augustín Martinelli found Turfanosuchus to be a pseudosuchian once again during the study of the recently discovered archosauriform Koilamasuchus . This reassignment was based on the structure of the calcaneum (heel bone), which is similar to that of other early pseudosuchians, especially aetosaurs. [6] This conclusion was also supported in 2011 by Sterling Nesbitt's comprehensive analysis on archosaurs and archosauriforms. This analysis noted that some archosaurs (such as Eoraptor ) also had palatal teeth, and other (such as Silesaurus and early poposauroids) had internal carotid arteries which entered the braincase from below. In addition, the calcaneum was re-evaluated and Parrish's observations of the ankle were reconfirmed. [3]

In 2014, Turfanosuchus was found to be closely related to the small suchians Gracilisuchus and Yonghesuchus , in the newly created family Gracilisuchidae. Most of the similarities justifying this classification were present in the skull, and some were originally considered unique to Turfanosuchus. [4]

Related Research Articles

<i>Venaticosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Venaticosuchus is a genus of pseudosuchian archosaurs from the family Ornithosuchidae. Known from a single species, Venaticosuchus rusconii, this genus is described based on an incomplete skull and jaw collected from the Late Triassic (Carnian) Ischigualasto Formation in the Ischigualasto-Villa Unión Basin in northwestern Argentina, which was deposited around 230 million years ago. This fossil material has been termed the holotype specimen PVL 2578. Venaticosuchus incorporated a myriad of features present in the other two genera of ornithosuchids, Ornithosuchus and Riojasuchus. However, it also had several unique traits, relating to the lower jaw.

<i>Gracilisuchus</i> Genus of fossil reptiles

Gracilisuchus is an extinct genus of tiny pseudosuchian from the Late Triassic of Argentina. It contains a single species, G. stipanicicorum, which is placed in the clade Suchia, close to the ancestry of crocodylomorphs. Both the genus and the species were first described by Alfred Romer in 1972.

<i>Askeptosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Askeptosaurus is an extinct genus of askeptosauroid, a marine reptile from the extinct order Thalattosauria. Askeptosaurus is known from several well-preserved fossils found in Middle Triassic marine strata in what is now Italy and Switzerland.

<i>Vancleavea</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Vancleavea is a genus of extinct, armoured, non-archosaurian archosauriforms from the Late Triassic of western North America. The type and only known species is V. campi, named by Robert Long & Phillip A Murry in 1995. At that time, the genus was only known from fragmentary bones including osteoderms and vertebrae. However, since then many more fossils have been found, including a pair of nearly complete skeletons discovered in 2002. These finds have shown that members of the genus were bizarre semiaquatic reptiles. Vancleavea individuals had short snouts with large, fang-like teeth, and long bodies with small limbs. They were completely covered with bony plates known as osteoderms, which came in several different varieties distributed around the body. Phylogenetic analyses by professional paleontologists have shown that Vancleavea was an archosauriform, part of the lineage of reptiles that would lead to archosaurs such as dinosaurs and crocodilians. Vancleavea lacks certain traits which are present in most other archosauriforms, most notably the antorbital, mandibular and supratemporal fenestrae, which are weight-saving holes in the skulls of other taxa. However, other features clearly support its archosauriform identity, including a lack of intercentra, the presence of osteoderms, an ossified laterosphenoid, and several adaptations of the femur and ankle bones. In 2016, a new genus of archosauriform, Litorosuchus, was described. This genus resembled both Vancleavea and more typical archosauriforms in different respects, allowing Litorosuchus to act as a transitional fossil linking Vancleavea to less aberrant archosauriforms.

<i>Parringtonia</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Parringtonia is an extinct genus of Triassic archosaur within the family Erpetosuchidae, known from the type species Parringtonia gracilis. It is known from a single specimen, NHMUK R8646, found from the Anisian-age Manda Formation of Tanzania. This specimen, like most archosaur material from the Manda Formation, is fragmentary, including only a maxilla and a few postcranial bones. They show similarities with those of another archosaur called Erpetosuchus, known from the Middle Triassic of Scotland and the eastern United States. The phylogenetic placement of Parringtonia and Erpetosuchus are uncertain; some studies placed them close to the group Crocodylomorpha, which includes all modern crocodylians and many extinct forms that diversified after the Triassic, but this relationship has more recently been questioned.

<i>Yonghesuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Yonghesuchus is an extinct genus of Late Triassic archosaur reptile. Remains have been found from the early Late Triassic Tongchuan Formation in Shanxi, China. It is named after Yonghe County, the county where fossils were found. Currently only one species, Y. sangbiensis, is known. The specific name refers to Sangbi Creek, as fossils were found in one of its banks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Suchia</span> Clade of reptiles

Suchia is a clade of archosaurs containing the majority of pseudosuchians. It was defined as the least inclusive clade containing Aetosaurus ferratus, Rauisuchus tiradentes, Prestosuchus chiniquensis, and Crocodylus niloticus by Nesbitt (2011). Generally the only pseudosuchian group which is omitted from Suchia is the family Ornithosuchidae, although at least one analysis classifies ornithosuchids as close relatives of erpetosuchids and aetosaurs. Phytosaurs are also excluded from Suchia, although it is not certain whether they qualify as pseudosuchians in the first place.

<i>Rhadinosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Rhadinosuchus is an extinct genus of proterochampsian archosauriform reptile from the Late Triassic. It is known only from the type species Rhadinosuchus gracilis, reposited in Munich, Germany. The fossil includes an incomplete skull and fragments of post-cranial material. Hosffstetter (1955), Kuhn (1966), Reig (1970) and Bonaparte (1971) hypothesized it to be synonymous with Cerritosaurus, but other characteristics suggest it is closer to Chanaresuchus and Gualosuchus, while it is certainly different from Proterochampsa and Barberenachampsa. The small size indicates it is a young animal, making it hard to classify.

<i>Daemonosaurus</i> Genus of reptiles (fossil)

Daemonosaurus is an extinct genus of possible theropod dinosaur from the Late Triassic of New Mexico. The only known fossil is a skull and neck fragments from deposits of the latest Triassic Chinle Formation at Ghost Ranch. Daemonosaurus was an unusual dinosaur with a short skull and large, fang-like teeth. It lived alongside early neotheropods such as Coelophysis, which would have been among the most common dinosaurs by the end of the Triassic. However, Daemonosaurus retains several plesiomorphic ("primitive") traits of the snout, and it likely lies outside the clade Neotheropoda. It may be considered a late-surviving basal theropod or non-theropod basal saurischian, possibly allied to other early predatory dinosaurs such as herrerasaurids or Tawa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Erpetosuchidae</span> Extinct family of reptiles

Erpetosuchidae is an extinct family of pseudosuchian archosaurs. Erpetosuchidae was named by D. M. S. Watson in 1917 to include Erpetosuchus. It includes the type species Erpetosuchus granti from the Late Triassic of Scotland, Erpetosuchus sp. from the Late Triassic of eastern United States and Parringtonia gracilis from the middle Middle Triassic of Tanzania; the group might also include Dyoplax arenaceus from the Late Triassic of Germany, Archeopelta arborensis and Pagosvenator candelariensis from Brazil and Tarjadia ruthae from Argentina.

<i>Diandongosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Diandongosuchus is an extinct genus of archosauriform reptile, possibly a member of the Phytosauria, known from the Middle Triassic of China. The type species Diandongosuchus fuyuanensis was named in 2012 from the Zhuganpo Formation of Yunnan Province. It is a marine species that shows similarities with another Chinese Triassic species called Qianosuchus mixtus, although it has fewer adaptations toward marine life. It was originally classified as the basal-most member of the pseudosuchian clade Poposauroidea. However, a subsequent study conducted by Stocker et al. indicated it to be the basalmost known phytosaur instead.

<i>Wangisuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Wangisuchus is an extinct genus of archosauriform reptile from the Middle Triassic of China that is known from fragmentary fossil jaw bones. These bones were found at the Hsishihwa locality in the upper Ermaying Formation, which dates to the late Anisian stage about 242 million years ago. Wangisuchus was named in 1964 by Chinese paleontologist Yang Zhongjian, who described a single species, Wangisuchus tzeyii, on the basis of these bones.

<i>Palatodonta</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Palatodonta is an extinct genus of basal placodontiform marine reptile known from the early Middle Triassic of the Netherlands. It is closely related to a group of marine reptiles called placodonts, characterized by their crushing teeth and shell-like body armor. Palatodonta is transitional between placodonts and earlier reptiles; like placodonts, it has teeth on its palate, but while these teeth are thick and blunt in placodonts, Palatodonta has palatal teeth that are thin and pointed.

Jaxtasuchus is an extinct genus of armored doswelliid archosauriform reptile known from the Middle Triassic of the Erfurt Formation in Germany. The type species, Jaxtasuchus salomoni, was named in 2013 on the basis of several incomplete skeletons and other isolated remains. Like other doswelliids, members of the genus were heavily armored, with four longitudinal rows of bony plates called osteoderms covering the body. Jaxtasuchus is the first doswelliid known from Europe and is most closely related to Doswellia from the Late Triassic of the eastern United States. However, it was not as specialized as Doswellia, retaining several generalized archosauriform characteristics and having less armor. Jaxtasuchus fossils have been found in aquatic mudstones alongside fossils of temnospondyl amphibians, crustaceans, and mollusks, suggesting that Jaxtasuchus was semiaquatic like modern crocodilians.

<i>Asperoris</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Asperoris is an extinct genus of archosauriform reptile known from the Middle Triassic Manda Beds of southwestern Tanzania. It is the first archosauriform known from the Manda Beds that is not an archosaur. However, its relationships with other non-archosaurian archosauriforms are uncertain. It was first named by Sterling J. Nesbitt, Richard J. Butler and David J. Gower in 2013 and the type species is Asperoris mnyama. Asperoris means "rough face" in Latin, referring to the distinctive rough texture of its skull bones.

Nundasuchus is an extinct genus of crurotarsan, possibly a suchian archosaur related to Paracrocodylomorpha. Remains of this genus are known from the Middle Triassic Manda beds of southwestern Tanzania. It contains a single species, Nundasuchus songeaensis, known from a single partially complete skeleton, including vertebrae, limb elements, osteoderms, and skull fragments.

<i>Carnufex</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Carnufex is an extinct genus of crocodylomorph suchian from the Late Triassic of North America. The genus was first described in 2015 by Zanno et al., who named the binomial Carnufex carolinensis, meaning "Carolina butcher". Two specimens are known, the holotype skull and skeleton NCSM 21558, and the referred humerus NCSM 21623. The specimens are from the Carnian-age Pekin Formation, which dates to 231 million years ago. Based on the holotype, Carnufex would have been about 3 m (9.8 ft) long and 1.5 m (4.9 ft) tall, although it may have gotten larger due to the holotype not being fully grown.

Aphanosauria is an extinct group of reptiles distantly related to dinosaurs. They are at the base of a group known as Avemetatarsalia, one of two main branches of archosaurs. The other main branch, Pseudosuchia, includes modern crocodilians. Aphanosaurs possessed features from both groups, indicating that they are the oldest and most primitive known clade of avemetatarsalians, at least in terms of their position on the archosaur family tree. Other avemetatarsalians include the flying pterosaurs, small bipedal lagerpetids, herbivorous silesaurids, and the incredibly diverse dinosaurs, which survive to the present day in the form of birds. Aphanosauria is formally defined as the most inclusive clade containing Teleocrater rhadinus and Yarasuchus deccanensis but not Passer domesticus or Crocodylus niloticus. This group was first recognized during the description of Teleocrater. Although only known by a few genera, Aphanosaurs had a widespread distribution across Pangaea in the Middle Triassic. They were fairly slow quadrupedal long-necked carnivores, a biology more similar to basal archosaurs than to advanced avemetatarsalians such as pterosaurs, lagerpetids, and early dinosaurs. In addition, they seemingly possess 'crocodile-normal' ankles, showing that 'advanced mesotarsal' ankles were not basal to the whole clade of Avemetatarsalia. Nevertheless, they possessed elevated growth rates compared to their contemporaries, indicating that they grew quickly, more like birds than other modern reptiles. Despite superficially resembling lizards, the closest modern relatives of aphanosaurs are birds.

<i>Rugarhynchos</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Rugarhynchos is an extinct genus of doswelliid archosauriform from the Late Triassic of New Mexico. The only known species is Rugarhynchos sixmilensis. It was originally described as a species of Doswellia in 2012, before receiving its own genus in 2020. Rugarhynchos was a close relative of Doswellia and shared several features with it, such as the absence of an infratemporal fenestra and heavily textured skull bones. However, it could also be distinguished by many unique characteristics, such as a thick diagonal ridge on the side of the snout, blunt spikes on its osteoderms, and a complex suture between the quadratojugal, squamosal, and jugal. Non-metric multidimensional scaling and tooth morphology suggest that Rugarhynchos had a general skull anatomy convergent with some crocodyliforms, spinosaurids, and phytosaurs. However, its snout was somewhat less elongated than those other reptiles.

<i>Polymorphodon</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Polymorphodon is an extinct genus of archosauriform reptile from the Middle Triassic of Germany. The only known species is Polymorphodon adorfi, discovered in Lower Keuper deposits at a quarry in Eschenau, Germany. Polymorphodon is notable for its heterodont dentition, with long and conical premaxillary teeth followed by thin maxillary teeth with large serrations. Maxillary teeth near the back of the mouth are short and leaf-shaped, similar to some living and extinct reptiles with a herbivorous or omnivorous diet. This may suggest that Polymorphodon had some reliance on plants in its diet, a rarity among basal archosauriforms, most of which are carnivores.

References

  1. Turfanosuchus at Fossilworks.org
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wu, Xiao-Chun; Russell, Anthony (2001). "Redescription of Turfanosuchus dabanensis (Archosauriformes) and new information on its phylogenetic relationships" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 21 (1): 40–50. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0040:ROTDAA]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   0272-4634. S2CID   56213383. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-16. Retrieved 2008-06-08.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nesbitt, S.J. (2011). "The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and the origin of major clades". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 352: 1–292. doi: 10.1206/352.1 . hdl:2246/6112. S2CID   83493714.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Butler, Richard J; Sullivan, Corwin; Ezcurra, Martín D; Liu, Jun; Lecuona, Agustina; Sookias, Roland B (2014). "New clade of enigmatic early archosaurs yields insights into early pseudosuchian phylogeny and the biogeography of the archosaur radiation". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 14 (1): 128. Bibcode:2014BMCEE..14..128B. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-128 . ISSN   1471-2148. PMC   4061117 . PMID   24916124.
  5. Sookias, R. B.; Sullivan, C.; Liu, J.; Butler, R. J. (2014). "Systematics of putative euparkeriids (Diapsida: Archosauriformes) from the Triassic of China". PeerJ. 2: e658. doi: 10.7717/peerj.658 . PMC   4250070 . PMID   25469319.
  6. Ezcurra, M.D.; Lecuona, A.; Martinelli, A. (2010). "A new basal archosauriform diapsid from the Lower Triassic of Argentina". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 30 (5): 1433–1450. Bibcode:2010JVPal..30.1433E. doi:10.1080/02724634.2010.501446. S2CID   83826840.