Scolotosuchus

Scolotosuchus; Temporal range: Early Triassic Olenekian PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N ↓
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Reptilia
Family:	Rauisuchidae
Genus:	Scolotosuchus; Sennikov, 2023
Type species
	Scolotosuchus basileus; Sennikov, 2023

Last updated July 29, 2023

Scolotosuchus is an extinct genus of rauisuchid from the Early Triassic of Russia. The only known species, Scolotosuchus basileus, has been discovered at the Donskaya Luka Locality. It differs from all other rauisuchids in the morphology of its spine, which allowed it to both resist great stress and gave it a great range of mobility. Additionally, it may have lacked osteoderms, with its spine instead being supported in a similar manner as in dinosaurs. At 3 m (9.8 ft) it was likely the apex predator of its ecosystem.^[1]

History and naming

In 1999 several isolated fossil remains of a large rauisuchid were described from the Donskaya Luka Locality within the Lipovskaya Formation, located in the Central Russian Upland. The taxon this material was attributed to was named Scythosuchus basileus by paleontologist Andrey Gerasimovich Sennikov, who at the time thought it was a large but short-necked rauisuchid.^[2] Later research conducted by Sennikov however called the validity of Scythosuchus into question, as the holotype specimen, a poorly preserved neck vertebrae, was found to be similar to the fossils of the poposauroid Tsylmosuchus . This resulted in Scythosuchus being considered a junior synonym of Tsylmosuchus.^[3] However while the holotype itself was found to lack distinguishing traits, the type series of Scythosuchus also included a series of thoracic vertebrae notable for their short spinous processes and rugose dorsal ends. These vertebrae had previously been used to diagnose Scythosuchus and clearly belonged to a distinct type of early pseudosuchian unrelated to Tsylmosuchus. The discovery of additional vertebrae of similar morphology supported the idea that a large rauisuchid was present at Donskaya Luka, eventually leading Sennikov to establish the new genus Scolotosuchus, this time with the thoracic vertebrae serving as the holotype specimen. In addition to vertebrae, a partial pelvis, hindlimbs and a calcaneum are also assigned to this new genus.^[1]

The name Scolotosuchus is derived from the "Skolotoi", the native name of the Scythians that once inhabited the region the fossils were found in. This mirrors the name of Scythosuchus, the taxon that the type material was once assigned to. The suffix "suchus" meanwhile derives from the Greek soukhos meaning crocodile, a common element in the names of prehistoric pseudosuchians. The species name "basileus" also derives from Greek and means king. It was chosen in part due to the fact that it had previously been the species name of Scythosuchus, but also do reference the royal Scythians that lived north of the Sea of Azov.^[1]

Description

Scolotosuchus is known for the peculiar morphology of its vertebrae which is highly variable along the spinal column. The neck and early thoracic vertebrae are characterized by their short and low spinous processes, with the neural spine being of approximately equal height and length. Another feature present in both the later neck vertebrae as well as the early thoracic vertebrae are the well developed rugosities on the ends of their spinous processes. These are considered to be hypertrophied apophyseal ossifications by Sennikov, rather than the result of osteoderms fusing with the vertebrae. Sennikov also notes that the frequent discovery of isolated neural arches may indicate that the suture between the neural arch and the centra of the vertebrae are only weakly fused or not fused at all even in adult individuals. This would cause the vertebrae to effectively fall apart once the muscles begin to rot and the body decomposes or gets buried. The anterior articular processes (prezygapophysis) are notably wider than the posterior articular processes (postzygapophysis) in the neck and first thoracic vertebrae, but more similar size in the following trunk vertebrae. The later neck vertebrae, around the 7th or 8th, have high and narrow neural canals formed by the fact that the neural arches are composed of long legs and relatively short spinous processes. Both the hyposphene and the hypantrum, located at the back and front of each vertebra respectively, are well developed and the hypantrum in particular is accompanied by accessory laminae and depressions in the bone. The middle vertebrae of the neck show a neural spine that is bifurcated, giving it a Y-shape. This well defined bifurcation is another trait that is unique to Scolotosuchus among rauisuchids, as any other members of this family with bifurcated neural spines have this feature only weakly developed. This applies to both Batrachotomus and Stagonosuchus (which are considered rauisuchids by Sennikov), in which the bifurcation is additionally restricted to only the front of the neural spine. Sennikov also mentions Mandasuchus as the only rauisuchid with a fully bifurcated neural spine besides Scolotosuchus,^[1] however other authors such as Sterling J. Nesbitt do not regard these taxa to be rauisuchids at all.^[4]

The preacetabular process of the illium is short and projects slightly cranially, the fact that this process is only poorly developed is seen in no other rauisuchid other than Ticinosuchus from the Middle Triassic of Europe. The subvertical crest is only sloping slightly, which sets Scolotosuchus apart from the American Postosuchus. The dorsal blade is low and the upper margin almost straight, both features typical for rauisuchids and clearly aligning Scolotosuchus with this group rather than with the contemporary ctenosauriscid Bystrowisuchus , which possessed a saddle-shaped dorsal blade. The ischium likewise falls within the typical rauisuchid anatomy, with a wide proximal end that connects to the illium and a narrow distal end. The femur is sigmoid in shape and elongated with a slightly compressed shaft and moderately wide ends, again generally resembling what is expected of a rauisuchid. The tibia and a fragmentary fibula are both described as being massive, with the former also being elongated and having a rounded proximal and oval distal ending to it.^[1]

The calcaneum matches the crocodiloid-type ankle joint with a short tuber. The region where the calcaneum articulares with the astragalus is however convex, bearing slight resemblance to members of the Euparkeriidae, but otherwise shows no depressions or projections.^[1]

Sennikov estimates that Scolotosuchus may have reached a length of approximately 3 m (9.8 ft).^[1]

Paleoecology

Sennikov points out that bifurcated neural spines are typically associated with the development of strong epaxial musculature and ligament, either in order to support a heavy head, a long neck or animals in which the neck and head are moved with great flexion or at great speeds. As Scolotosuchus shows no signs of having possessed an elongated neck, it is considered much more likely that it was the size and weight of the head that may have led to the evolution of bifurcated neural spines. However, since this does not appear to be the case in most other rauisuchids or other predatory loricatans, Sennikov additionally proposes that Scolotosuchus may have differed from its relatives through the specific methods it used to capture and kill prey. It is suggested that it may have moved its head rapidly and jerked heavy prey around. The rugose ends of the spine towards the back of the neck and at the front of the torso are also indicative of strong ligament attachments.^[1]

The proportions of the prezygapophyses compared to the postzygapophyses further indicate that in addition to being able to sustain great loads, the neck was very mobile. This is expected for the first thoracic vertebrae, where Scolotosuchus had the greatest range of mobility, especially side to side, but is more unusual for the central neck vertebrae. These vertebrae, despite being short-bodied, had a great range of motion both up and down and sideways. Towards the back of the neck the mobility is decreased slightly and after the transition between neck and torso the vertebrae show a more expected range of motion. This and the presence of infrahypantrum laminae indicates that the back of the neck and front of the torso endured the greatest loads. The combination of great flexibility with strong forces then likely led to the development of the well developed hyposphene-hypantrum articulation in order to stabilize the spine.^[1]

Finally, Sennikov draws parallels between the rugose expansion of the neural spine seen in Scolotosuchus and those seen in poposauroids, which are likely to have lost their osteoderms and instead evolved a support system more similar to that of dinosaurs. Modern crocodiles and many extinct pseudosuchians, rauisuchids included, use their osteoderms in combination with musculature and ligaments to create a "beam bridge" that allows them to lift their bodies off the ground for an erect or partially erect gait. Mammals, dinosaurs and possibly poposauroids meanwhile use a "suspension bridge"-like system formed by ligaments and musculature that hold up the spine from the elongated spinal processes around the shoulder region. While Sennikov does not exclude the possibility that Scolotosuchus did have osteoderms in addition to the rugose neural spine expansions, he notes that no such fossils have been found anywhere at Donskaya Luka.^[1]

In summary, Scolotosuchus was likely the apex predator of its environment, likely having had a large head seated atop a neck built to endure great stress both while resting and while capturing prey while also being very flexible. It likely had an erect gait similar to other rauisuchids, possibly supported by musculature and ligament more similar to those of dinosaurs than those of other pseudosuchians.^[1]

Paleoenvironment

At Donskaya Luka Scolotosuchus would have coexisted with a variety of other pseudosuchians and archosaurs, including the small poposauroid Tsylmosuchus , the large ctenosauriscid Bystrowisuchus and even the potential erythrosuchid Garjainia . Other animals include the dicynodont Putillosaurus , the tanystropheid Augustaburiania , the pistosaurid Tanaisosaurus , multiple trilophosaurids such as Coelodontognathus as well as a great variety of labyrinthodonts. Notably, the fauna of this region differs greatly from areas in the north and southeast, possibly explained by the presence of large sea bays. This would explain why influence from Gondwana (through erythrosuchids) or Central Europe (in the form of rauisuchids, tanystrophids and ctenosauriscids) can be observed in the souther Urals but not to the north.^[1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rauisuchidae</span> Extinct family of reptiles

Rauisuchidae is a group of large predatory Triassic archosaurs. Some disagreement exists over which genera should be included in the Rauisuchidae and which should be in the related Prestosuchidae and Poposauridae, and indeed whether these should even be thought of as separate valid families. Rauisuchids occurred throughout much of the Triassic, and may have first occurred in the Early Triassic if some archosaurian taxa such as Scythosuchus and Tsylmosuchus are considered to be within the family.

Teleocrater is a genus of avemetatarsalian archosaur from the Middle Triassic Manda Formation of Tanzania. The name was coined by English paleontologist Alan Charig in his 1956 doctoral dissertation, but was only formally published in 2017 by Sterling Nesbitt and colleagues. The genus contains the type and only species T. rhadinus. Uncertainty over the affinities of Teleocrater have persisted since Charig's initial publication; they were not resolved until Nesbitt et al. performed a phylogenetic analysis. They found that Teleocrater is most closely related to the similarly enigmatic Yarasuchus, Dongusuchus, and Spondylosoma in a group that was named the Aphanosauria. Aphanosauria was found to be the sister group of the Ornithodira, the group containing dinosaurs and pterosaurs.

Poposaurus is an extinct genus of pseudosuchian archosaur from the Late Triassic of the southwestern United States. It belongs to the clade Poposauroidea, an unusual group of Triassic pseudosuchians that includes sail-backed, beaked, and aquatic forms. Fossils have been found in Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, and Texas. Except for the skull, most parts of the skeleton are known. The type species, P. gracilis, was described and named by Maurice Goldsmith Mehl in 1915. A second species, P. langstoni, was originally the type species of the genus Lythrosuchus. Since it was first described, Poposaurus has been variously classified as a dinosaur, a phytosaur, and a "rauisuchian".

Ctenosauriscus is an extinct genus of sail-backed poposauroid archosaur from Early Triassic deposits of Lower Saxony in northern Germany. It gives its name to the family Ctenosauriscidae, which includes other sail-backed poposauroids such as Arizonasaurus. Fossils have been found in latest Olenekian deposits around 247.5-247.2 million years old, making it one of the first known archosaurs.

Qianosuchus is an extinct genus of aquatic poposauroid archosaur from the middle Triassic (Anisian) Guanling Formation of Pan County, China. It is represented by two nearly complete skeletons and a crushed skull preserved in the limestone. Qianosuchus was at least 3 metres long, and had several skeletal adaptations which indicate a semi-marine lifestyle, similar to modern-day saltwater crocodiles. These adaptations have not been seen in any other archosaur from the Triassic.

Turfanosuchus is a genus of archosauriform reptile, likely a gracilisuchid archosaur, which lived during the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of northwestern China. The type species, T. dabanensis, was described by C.C. Young in 1973, based on a partially complete but disarticulated fossil skeleton found in the Kelamayi Formation of the Turfan Basin.

Yarasuchus is an extinct genus of avemetatarsalian archosaur that lived during the Anisian stage of the Middle Triassic of India. The genus was named and described in 2005 from a collection of disarticulated but fairly complete fossil material found from the Middle Triassic Yerrapalli Formation. The material is thought to be from two individuals, possibly three, with one being much more complete and articulated than the other. The type and only species is Y. deccanensis. Yarasuchus was a quadruped roughly 2–2.5 metres (6.6–8.2 ft) long, with an elongated neck and tall spines on its vertebrae. Unlike other quadrupedal Triassic reptiles, the limbs and shoulders of Yarasuchus were slender, and more like those of ornithodirans.

Stagonosuchus is an extinct genus of loricatan, or possibly a species of Prestosuchus. Fossils have been found from the Late Triassic Manda Formation in Tanzania that are Anisian in age.

Scythosuchus is an extinct genus of rauisuchid. Remains have been found from Olenekian-age Lower Triassic beds in Russia, hence the name meaning 'Scythian crocodile'. The type and only species is S. basileus, described in 1999. Scythosuchus was between 2 and 3 metres long, and relatively heavily built. It is known from a partial skull, much of the spine, a fragment of the humerus and most of the hind leg and foot. It may have been the same animal as Tsylmosuchus donensis.

Tsylmosuchus is an extinct genus of potentially dubious basal archosauriform reptile known from Western Russia. Fossils referred to Tsylmosuchus occurred over a wide area in sediments corresponding to the Induan and Olenekian stages of the Early Triassic. Most of these fossils are fragmentary neck vertebrae which were originally reported as sharing similarities with crocodile-line archosaurs (pseudosuchians) such as Mandasuchus. As a result, Tsylmosuchus was first described as part of the family Rauisuchidae, making it supposedly one of the oldest known archosaurs. However, its fragmentary remains do not show any of the distinguishing features of rauisuchids or even pseudosuchians in general, so Tsylmosuchus has more recently been interpreted as an indeterminate archosauriform. Although three species of Tsylmosuchus have been named, they lack diagnostic traits and are probably not distinct from each other.

Vjushkovisaurus is an extinct genus of Middle Triassic archosauriform. It is known from the Anisian-aged Donguz Gorizont in Sol-Iletsk, Orenburg Oblast, Russia. The genus was named in 1982, with the type species being V. berdjanensis. Material has been collected in the Berdyanka II locality from a fossil assemblage called the Eryosuchus Fauna along the Berdyanka River, specifically in a sand-carbonate concretion in the upper part of the main river channel. Vjushkovisaurus is known only from the holotype PIN 2865/62, a partial postcranial skeleton which consists of 12 presacral vertebrae, left humerus, ribs, a fragment of the coracoid and a fragment of the fibula.

Poposauroidea is a clade of advanced pseudosuchians. It includes poposaurids, shuvosaurids, ctenosauriscids, and other unusual pseudosuchians such as Qianosuchus and Lotosaurus. However, it excludes most large predatory quadrupedal "rauisuchians" such as rauisuchids and "prestosuchids". Those reptiles are now allied with crocodylomorphs in a clade known as Loricata, which is the sister taxon to the poposauroids in the clade Paracrocodylomorpha. Although it was first formally defined in 2007, the name "Poposauroidea" has been used for many years. The group has been referred to as Poposauridae by some authors, although this name is often used more narrowly to refer to the family that includes Poposaurus and its close relatives.

Xilousuchus is an extinct genus of poposauroid from lower Triassic deposits of Fugu County of northeastern Shanxi Province, China. It is known from the holotype, IVPP V 6026, a single well-preserved partial skeleton including the skull. It was found from the Heshanggou Formation of the Ordos Basin, Hazhen commune. It was first named by Xiao-Chun Wu in 1981 and the type species is Xilousuchus sapingensis. Wu (1981) referred Xilousuchus to the Proterosuchia. Gower and Sennikov (1996) found it to be an erythrosuchian based strictly on the braincase. A more detailed re-description of the genus was provided by Nesbitt et al. (2010) and found poposauroid affinities. In his massive revision of archosaurs which included a large cladistic analysis, Sterling J. Nesbitt (2011) found Xilousuchus to be a poposauroid which is most closely related to Arizonasaurus. Xilousuchus is the oldest archosaur to date, although Ctenosauriscus and Vytshegdosuchus might be even older by less than one million year. Since Xilousuchus is a suchian archosaur, its early age suggests that most of the major groups of archosaurs developed by the Early Triassic, soon after the appearance of the first archosaur.

Erpetosuchidae is an extinct family of pseudosuchian archosaurs. Erpetosuchidae was named by D. M. S. Watson in 1917 to include Erpetosuchus. It includes the type species Erpetosuchus granti from the Late Triassic of Scotland, Erpetosuchus sp. from the Late Triassic of eastern United States and Parringtonia gracilis from the middle Middle Triassic of Tanzania; the group might also include Dyoplax arenaceus from the Late Triassic of Germany, Archeopelta arborensis and Pagosvenator candelariensis from Brazil and Tarjadia ruthae from Argentina.

Diandongosuchus is an extinct genus of archosauriform reptile, possibly a member of the Phytosauria, known from the Middle Triassic of China. The type species Diandongosuchus fuyuanensis was named in 2012 from the Zhuganpo Formation of Yunnan Province. It is a marine species that shows similarities with another Chinese Triassic species called Qianosuchus mixtus, although it has fewer adaptations toward marine life. It was originally classified as the basal-most member of the pseudosuchian clade Poposauroidea. However, a subsequent study conducted by Stocker et al. indicated it to be the basalmost known phytosaur instead.

Bystrowisuchus is an extinct genus of ctenosauriscid pseudosuchian archosaur from the Early Triassic of European Russia. Fossils have been found in the Olenekian-age Lipovskaya Formation in Ilovlinsky District. The type species is Bystrowisuchus flerovi.

Nundasuchus is an extinct genus of crurotarsan, possibly a suchian archosaur related to Paracrocodylomorpha. Remains of this genus are known from the Middle Triassic Manda beds of southwestern Tanzania. It contains a single species, Nundasuchus songeaensis, known from a single partially complete skeleton, including vertebrae, limb elements, osteoderms, and skull fragments.

Aphanosauria is an extinct group of reptiles distantly related to dinosaurs. They are at the base of a group known as Avemetatarsalia, one of two main branches of archosaurs. The other main branch, Pseudosuchia, includes modern crocodilians. Aphanosaurs possessed features from both groups, indicating that they are the oldest and most primitive known clade of avemetatarsalians, at least in terms of their position on the archosaur family tree. Other avemetatarsalians include the flying pterosaurs, small bipedal lagerpetids, herbivorous silesaurids, and the incredibly diverse dinosaurs, which survive to the present day in the form of birds. Aphanosauria is formally defined as the most inclusive clade containing Teleocrater rhadinus and Yarasuchus deccanensis but not Passer domesticus or Crocodylus niloticus. This group was first recognized during the description of Teleocrater. Although only known by a few genera, Aphanosaurs had a widespread distribution across Pangaea in the Middle Triassic. They were fairly slow quadrupedal long-necked carnivores, a biology more similar to basal archosaurs than to advanced avemetatarsalians such as pterosaurs, lagerpetids, and early dinosaurs. In addition, they seemingly possess 'crocodile-normal' ankles, showing that 'advanced mesotarsal' ankles were not basal to the whole clade of Avemetatarsalia. Nevertheless, they possessed elevated growth rates compared to their contemporaries, indicating that they grew quickly, more like birds than other modern reptiles. Despite superficially resembling lizards, the closest modern relatives of aphanosaurs are birds.

Aenigmaspina is an extinct genus of enigmatic pseudosuchian (=crurotarsan) archosaur from the Late Triassic of the United Kingdom. Its fossils are known from the Pant-y-ffynnon Quarry in South Wales, of which its type and only known species is named after, A. pantyffynnonensis. Aenigmaspina is characterised by the unusual spines on its vertebrae, which are broad and flat on top with a unique 'Y' shape. Although parts of its skeleton is relatively well known, the affinities of Aenigmaspina to other pseudosuchians are unclear, although it is possibly related to families Ornithosuchidae, Erpetosuchidae or Gracilisuchidae.

Incertovenator is an extinct genus of archosauriform reptile, likely an archosaur, of uncertain affinities. Its unstable position is a result of possessing a number features found in both the bird-line avemetatarsalian archosaurs and the crocodylian-line pseudosuchians. The type and only known species is I. longicollum, which is known from single specimen discovered in the Late Triassic Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina. Incertovenator is known almost entirely by its vertebral column. This indicates that it had a relatively long neck, leading to its uncertain classification due to the convergent evolution of elongated neck vertebrae in both avemetatarsalian and pseudosuchian archosaurs.

References

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sennikov, A. G. (2023). "A New Pseudosuchian from the Early Triassic of Eastern Europe". Paleontological Journal. 56 (11): 1391–1418. doi:10.1134/S0031030122110168.
↑ Sennikov, A.G. (1999). "The evolution of the postcranial skeleton in archosaurs in connection with new finds of the Rauisuchidae in the Early Triassic of Russia". Paleontological Journal (6): 44–56.
↑ Sennikov AG (2022). "On pseudosuchians Tsylmosuchus donensis and Scythosuchus basileus from the Early Triassic of Eastern Europe". Paleontological Journal. 56 (1): 91–96.
↑ Richard J. Butler; Sterling J. Nesbitt; Alan J. Charig; David J. Gower; Paul M. Barrett (2018). "Mandasuchus tanyauchen, gen. et sp. nov., a pseudosuchian archosaur from the Manda Beds (?Middle Triassic) of Tanzania" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 37 (Supplement to No. 6): 96–121. doi:10.1080/02724634.2017.1343728. S2CID 90164051.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[type-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sennikov, A. G. (2023). "A New Pseudosuchian from the Early Triassic of Eastern Europe". Paleontological Journal. 56 (11): 1391–1418. doi:10.1134/S0031030122110168.

[SAG99-2] Sennikov, A.G. (1999). "The evolution of the postcranial skeleton in archosaurs in connection with new finds of the Rauisuchidae in the Early Triassic of Russia". Paleontological Journal (6): 44–56.

[Sennikov22-3] Sennikov AG (2022). "On pseudosuchians Tsylmosuchus donensis and Scythosuchus basileus from the Early Triassic of Eastern Europe". Paleontological Journal. 56 (1): 91–96.

[manda-4] Richard J. Butler; Sterling J. Nesbitt; Alan J. Charig; David J. Gower; Paul M. Barrett (2018). "Mandasuchus tanyauchen, gen. et sp. nov., a pseudosuchian archosaur from the Manda Beds (?Middle Triassic) of Tanzania" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 37 (Supplement to No. 6): 96–121. doi:10.1080/02724634.2017.1343728. S2CID 90164051.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]