United States Court for China

Last updated
United States Court for China
Defunct
Seal of US District court for China.jpg
Location Shanghai International Settlement
Appeals to Ninth Circuit
EstablishedJune 30, 1906
AbolishedMay 20, 1943

Notes

  1. Judge Charles S. Lobingier gave detailed evidence on the workings of, and application of law by, the court and extraterritoriality in China to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs in 1917. [19]

Related Research Articles

Jurisdiction is the legal term for the legal authority granted to a legal entity to enact justice. In federations like the United States, the concept of jurisdiction applies at multiple levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of the United States Virgin Islands</span>

Politics of the United States Virgin Islands takes place in a framework of a presidential representative democratic dependency, whereby the governor is the head of the territory's government, and of a multi-party system. United States Virgin Islands are an unincorporated and organized territory of the United States, administered by the Office of Insular Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior. Executive power is exercised by the local government of the Virgin Islands. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature.

Universal jurisdiction is a legal principle that allows states or international organizations to claim criminal jurisdiction over an accused person, regardless of where the alleged crime was committed and irrespective of the accused's nationality, country of residence, or any other connection to the prosecuting entity. Crimes prosecuted under universal jurisdiction are considered crimes against all, too serious to tolerate jurisdictional arbitrage. The concept of universal jurisdiction is therefore closely linked to the idea that some international norms are erga omnes, or owed to the entire world community, as well as to the concept of jus cogens—that certain international law obligations are binding on all states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extraterritoriality</span> State of being exempted from the jurisdiction of local law

In international law, extraterritoriality or exterritoriality is the state of being exempted from the jurisdiction of local law, usually as the result of diplomatic negotiations.

Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) is the legal ability of a government to exercise authority beyond its normal boundaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces</span> Federal tribunal for appeal of lower military courts

The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is an Article I court that exercises worldwide appellate jurisdiction over members of the United States Armed Forces on active duty and other persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The court is composed of five civilian judges appointed for 15-year terms by the president of the United States with the advice and consent of the United States Senate. The court reviews decisions from the intermediate appellate courts of the services: the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, the Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, and the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit</span> Current United States federal appellate court

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is one of the 13 United States courts of appeals. It has special appellate jurisdiction over certain categories of specialized cases in the U.S. federal court system. Specifically, it has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal cases involving patents, trademark registrations, government contracts, veterans' benefits, public safety officers' benefits, federal employees' benefits, and various other types of cases. The Federal Circuit has no jurisdiction over criminal, bankruptcy, immigration, or U.S. state law cases. It is headquartered at the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building in Washington, DC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shanghai International Settlement</span> Merged conceded territories (1863–1941)

The Shanghai International Settlement originated from the 1863 merger of the British and American enclaves in Shanghai, in which British and American citizens would enjoy extraterritoriality and consular jurisdiction under the terms of unequal treaties agreed by both parties. These treaties were abrogated in 1943.

Making false statements is the common name for the United States federal process crime laid out in Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which generally prohibits knowingly and willfully making false or fraudulent statements, or concealing information, in "any matter within the jurisdiction" of the federal government of the United States, even by merely denying guilt when asked by a federal agent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Japan Consular Service</span>

Britain had a functioning consular service in Japan from 1859 after the signing of the 1858 Anglo-Japanese Treaty of Amity and Commerce between James Bruce, 8th Earl of Elgin and the Tokugawa Shogunate until 1941 when Japan invaded the British colonial empire and declared war on the United Kingdom.

The Court of Claims was a federal court that heard claims against the United States government. It was established in 1855, renamed in 1948 to the United States Court of Claims, and abolished in 1982. Then, its jurisdiction was assumed by the newly created United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and United States Claims Court, which was later renamed the Court of Federal Claims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal enclave</span> Parcel of land which is within a state but under federal jurisdiction

In United States law, a federal enclave is a parcel of federal property within a state that is under the "Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States". These enclaves are used for the many different functions of the United States federal government, and include post offices, arsenals, dams, road, etc., and usually are owned, secured and administered by the U S. federal government itself. The United States in many cases has received similar jurisdictional authority over privately owned properties which it leases, or privately owned and occupied properties which are located within the exterior boundaries of a large area as to which a state has ceded jurisdiction to the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lebbeus R. Wilfley</span> American lawyer and judge (1866–1926)

Lebbeus Redman Wilfley was an American attorney who served as Attorney General of the Philippines and as a judge of the United States Court for China. He is also known for his investigation into the Torreón massacre.

Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that judges of the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals were judges created under Article III of the Constitution. As such, it was permissible for the Chief Justice of the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 293(a) to designate judges from the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to serve on district courts and courts of appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Supreme Court for China</span> 1865–1943 British court in China

The British Supreme Court for China was a court established in the Shanghai International Settlement to try cases against British subjects in China, Japan and Korea under the principles of extraterritoriality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles S. Lobingier</span> American jurist and judge (1866 – 1956)

Charles Sumner Lobingier was an American jurist who served as a judge of the Philippine Court of First Instance from 1904 to 1914 and as Judge of the United States Court for China in Shanghai from 1914 to 1924. He was also the author of a number of books on international and comparative law.

The British Court for Japan was a court established in Yokohama in 1879 to try cases against British subjects in Japan, under the principles of extraterritoriality. The court also heard appeals from British consular courts in Japan. Appeals from the British Court for Japan lay to the British Supreme Court for China and Japan based in the Shanghai International Settlement.

The Treaty between the United States and China for the Relinquishment of Extraterritorial Rights in China was a bilateral treaty signed by the United States and the Republic of China on January 11, 1943. The formal name of the treaty was Treaty Between the United States of America and the Republic of China for the Relinquishment of Extraterritorial Rights in China and the Regulation of Related Matters. It became effective on May 20, 1943, following the mutual exchange of ratifications pursuant to Article VIII.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rufus Thayer</span> American judge

Rufus Hildreth Thayer (1850–1917) was, between 1909 and 1913, the judge of the United States Court for China based in Shanghai.

Consular courts were law courts established by foreign powers in countries where they had extraterritorial rights. They were presided over by consular officers.

References

  1. implemented in An Act to Carry Into Effect Certain Provisions in the Treaties Between the United States and China and the Ottoman Porte, Giving Certain Judicial Powers to Ministers and Consuls of the United States in Those Countries, Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  30–150 , 9  Stat.   276 , enacted August 11, 1848
  2. Ruskola 2008, p. 220.
  3. 1848 Act, s. 8
  4. 1848 Act, s. 9
  5. 1848 Act, s. 11
  6. 1848 Act, s. 5
  7. An Act Creating a United States Court for China and prescribing the jurisdiction thereof, Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  59–403 , 34  Stat.   814 , enacted June 30, 1906
  8. 1906 Act, s. 3
  9. 1906 Act, s. 2
  10. United States v. Scogin, IExtraterritorial Cases376 (USC-C1914).
  11. United States v. Osman, IExtraterritorial Cases540 (USC-C1916).
  12. In re Robert Lee's Will, IExtraterritorial Cases699 , 710(USC-C1918).
  13. Latter, A.M. (1903). "The Government of the Foreigners in China". Law Quarterly Review . 19: 316., at 322
  14. Richards v. Richards, IExtraterritorial Cases480 (USC-C1915).
  15. Casement v. Squier, 138F.2d909 (9th Cir.1943)., citing In re Ross , 140 U.S. 453 (1891)
  16. 1906 Act, s.4
  17. 1 2 Ruskola 2008, p. 233.
  18. Biddle v. United States, 156F.759 (9th Cir.1907)., reversing (on other grounds) United States v. C.A. Biddle, IExtraterritorial Cases84 , 87(USC-C1907).
  19. Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, 65th Congress Sept 27 and 28 and 1 October 1917.
  20. United States ex rel. Raven v. McRae, IExtraterritorial Cases655 , 664(USC-C1917).
  21. 1906 Act, s. 5
  22. An Act to further the Administration of Justice, Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  42–255 , 17  Stat.   196 , enacted June 1, 1872
  23. Allman 1943, p. 99.
  24. New York Times, "US Officials kept in Hotel, December 9, 1941 and "Gripsholm brings 1,500 from the Orient" August 26, 1942.
  25. The Daily Herald (Biloxi and Gulfport), Jan 18, 1943.
  26. "Judge R. H. Thayer Dies of Apoplexy" (PDF). New York Times . July 13, 1917.
  27. Barker, Heather (2006) [2002]. "Addie Viola Smith (1893–1975)". Australian Dictionary of Biography . Canberra: National Centre of Biography, Australian National University. Archived from the original on February 22, 2024. Retrieved April 14, 2024.

Further reading

Legislation

Investigations

US National Archive files

United States Court for China
Traditional Chinese 美國中國事務法院
Simplified Chinese 美国中国事务法院
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin Měiguó Zhōngguó Shìwù Fǎ​yuàn