Apocalypse of Peter

Last updated

The Apocalypse of Peter, also called the Revelation of Peter, is an early Christian text of the 2nd century and a work of apocalyptic literature. It is not included in the standard canon of the New Testament, but is classed as part of New Testament apocrypha. The Apocalypse of Peter is mentioned in the Muratorian fragment, a 2nd-century list list of books thought to be canonical in Christianity. The Muratorian fragment expresses some hesitation on the work, saying that some authorities would not have it read in church. The text is extant in two incomplete versions based on a lost Koine Greek original: an edited Greek version and an Ethiopic version, which diverge considerably. It is influenced by both Jewish apocalyptic literature and Hellenistic philosophy from Greek culture. The Apocalypse of Peter is the earliest-written extant document depicting a Christian version of heaven and hell in detail.

Contents

The work's author is unknown, although it is purportedly written by the disciple Peter (pseudopigrapha). The Apocalypse of Peter describes a divine vision experienced by Peter through Christ. After inquiring for signs of the Second Coming of Jesus (parousia), the work delves into a katabasis (vision of the afterlife), and details both heavenly bliss for the saved and infernal punishments for the damned. In particular, the punishments are graphically described in a physical sense, and loosely correspond to lex talionis ("an eye for an eye"): blasphemers are hung by their tongues, liars who bear false witness have their lips cut off; callous rich people are made to wear rags and be pierced by sharp fiery stones as would beggars; and so on. It is an early example of the same genre of the more famous Divine Comedy of Dante, wherein the protagonist takes a tour of the realms of the afterlife.

Manuscript history

Papyrus fragment of the Apocalypse of Peter, found in Egypt Apocalypse of Peter.jpg
Papyrus fragment of the Apocalypse of Peter, found in Egypt

Before 1886, the Apocalypse of Peter had been known only through quotations and references in early Christian writings. In addition, some common lost source had been necessary to account for closely parallel passages in such apocalyptic Christian literature as the Apocalypse of Esdras and the Apocalypse of Paul, although identification of this lost source with the Apocalypse of Peter was not known.

A fragmented Koine Greek manuscript was discovered during excavations initiated by Gaston Maspéro during the 1886–87 season in a desert necropolis at Akhmim in Upper Egypt. The fragment consisted of parchment leaves of the Greek version that was claimed to be deposited in the grave of a Christian monk. [1] There are a wide range of estimates for when the manuscript itself was compiled; palaeographer Guglielmo Cavallo and papyrologist Herwig Maehler estimate that the late 6th century is the most likely. [2] The Greek manuscript is now kept in the Coptic Museum in Old Cairo. [2]

From 1907–1910, a large set of documents of Clementine literature in Ethiopic were published along with translations into French. [3] After reading the French translations, M. R. James realized in 1910 that there was a strong correspondence with the Greek Akhmim Apocalypse of Peter, and that these were Ethiopic versions of the same work. [4] [5] Further Ethiopic copies have been discovered since. These Ethiopic versions appear to have been translated from Arabic, which itself was translated from the lost Greek original. Two other short Greek fragments of the work have been discovered: a 5th-century fragment at the Bodleian library that had been discovered in Egypt in 1895, and the Rainer fragment at the Rainer collection in Vienna which perhaps comes from the 3rd or 4th century. [6] These fragments offer significant variations from the other versions. In many Ethiopic manuscripts, the Apocalypse of Peter forms the first part of new combined works; two notable ones are "The Second Coming of Christ and the Resurrection of the Dead" and "The Mystery of the Judgment of Sinners." [7]

In general, most scholars believe that the Ethiopic versions we have today are closer to the original manuscript, while the Greek manuscript discovered at Akhmim is a later and edited version. [6] [8] This is for a number of reasons: the Akhmim version is shorter, while the Ethiopic matches the claimed line count from the Stichometry of Nicephorus; patristic references and quotes seem to match the Ethiopic version better; the Ethiopic matches better with the Rainer and Bodleian Greek fragments; and the Akhmim version seems to be attempting to integrate the Apocalypse with the Gospel of Peter (also in the Akhmim manuscript), which would naturally result in revisions. [9] [4] [10]

Date of authorship

The Eastern Mediterranean region around 100 AD. Scholars hypothesize that the author of the Apocalypse of Peter may have been from Roman Judea or Roman Egypt. Alter Orient 0100AD.svg
The Eastern Mediterranean region around 100 AD. Scholars hypothesize that the author of the Apocalypse of Peter may have been from Roman Judea or Roman Egypt.

The Apocalypse of Peter seems to have been written between 100 AD and 150 AD. The terminus post quem —the point after which the Apocalypse of Peter must have been written—is shown by its use (in Chapter 3) of 4 Esdras, which was written about 100 AD. [6] The Apocalypse is mentioned or quoted in Clement of Alexandria's "Prophetic Scriptures" and in the Sibylline Oracles, implying it must have been in existence by 150 AD. [9]

The Muratorian fragment is the earliest existing list of canonical sacred writings of what would eventually be called the New Testament. The fragment is generally dated to the last quarter of the 2nd century (c. 175–200). It gives a list of works read in the Christian churches that is similar to the modern accepted canon; however, it also includes the Apocalypse of Peter. The Muratorian fragment states: "the Apocalypses also of John and Peter only do we receive, though some amongst us will not have this latter read in the Church." (The existence of other, non "received" Apocalypses is implied, and several early pieces of apocalyptic literature are known.) The scholar Richard Bauckham make a case for more precisely dating the composition to the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–136), and the author to being a Jewish Christian in the general region affected by the revolt. [note 1]

Content

The Apocalypse of Peter is framed as a discourse of the Risen Christ to his faithful. In the Ethiopic version, a vision of hell granted to Peter is discussed followed by a vision of heaven; in the Akhmim fragment, the order is reversed. In the form of a Greek katabasis or nekyia , it goes into elaborate detail about the punishment in hell for each type of crime, as well as briefly sketching the nature of heaven.

In the opening, the disciples ask for signs of the Second Coming (parousia) while on the Mount of Olives. The Gospel parables of the budding fig tree and the barren fig tree, partly selected from the "Little Apocalypse" of Matthew 24, [15] appear only in the Ethiopic version (ch. 2). The two parables are joined, and the setting "in the summer" has been transferred to "the end of the world", in a detailed allegory in which the tree becomes Israel and the flourishing shoots become Jews who have adopted Jesus as Messiah and achieve martyrdom. [16] It is possible this was edited out of the Greek Akhmim version due to incipient anti-Jewish tensions in the church; a depiction of Jews converting and Israel being especially blessed may not have fit the mood in the 4th and 5th centuries of the Church as some Christians strongly repudiated Judaism. [17]

The punishments in the vision closely correspond to the past sinful actions, usually with a correspondence between the body part that sinned and the body part that is tortured. [18] It is a loose version of the Jewish notion of an eye for an eye, that the punishment may fit the crime. [19] [20] The phrase "each according to his deed" appears five times in the Ethiopic version to explain the punishments. [21] Many of the punishments are overseen by Ezrael the Angel of Wrath (most likely the angel Azrael, although it is possibly a corrupt reference to the angel Sariel); the angel Uriel is also involved as well, largely in the process of resurrecting the dead into their new bodies. [22] Punishments in hell according to the vision include:

The vision of heaven is shorter than the depiction of hell, and described more fully in the Akhmim version. In heaven, people have pure milky white skin, curly hair, and are generally beautiful. The earth blooms with everlasting flowers and spices. People wear shiny clothes made of light, like the angels. Everyone sings in choral prayer. [23]

In the Ethiopic version, the account closes with an account of the Ascension of Jesus on the mountain from chapters 15–17. As the Akhmim version moved the Apocalypse earlier, to when Jesus was still alive, it is not in the Akhmim version.

Prayers for those in hell

One theological issue of note appears only in the version of the text in the 3rd century Rainer Fragment, the earliest fragment of the text. Its chapter 14 describes the salvation of condemned sinners for whom the righteous pray: [24]

Then I will grant to my called and elect ones whomsoever they request from me, out of the punishment. And I will give them [i.e. those for whom the elect pray] a fine baptism in salvation from Acherousian lake which is, they say, in the Elysian field, a portion of righteousness with my holy ones. [24]

While not found in later manuscripts, this reading was likely original to the text, as it agrees with a quotation in the Sibylline Oracles: [24]

To these pious ones imperishable God, the universal ruler, will also give another thing. Whenever they ask the imperishable God to save men from the raging fire and deathless gnashing he will grant it, and he will do this. For he will pick them out again from the undying fire and set them elsewhere and send them on account of his own people to another eternal life with the immortals in the Elysian plain where he has the long waves of the deep perennial Acherusian lake.

—  Sibylline Oracles, Book 2, 330–338 [25]

Other 2nd century parallel passages possibly influenced by this are found in the Epistle of the Apostles, the Coptic Apocalypse of Elijah, and possibly the Acts of Paul. [26] [27]

The passage also makes literary sense, as it is a follow-up to a passage in Chapter 3 where Jesus initially rebukes Peter who expresses horror at the suffering in hell; Richard Bauckham suggests that this is because it must be the victims who were harmed that request mercy, not Peter. While not directly endorsing universal salvation, it does suggest that salvation will eventually reach as far as the compassion of the elect. [24] Some of the Ethiopic manuscripts written in the 9th century and beyond include new extensions that also describe a great act of divine mercy to come that will rescue (some? all?) sinners from hell. [27]

The Ethiopic manuscript maintains a version of the passage, but it differs in that it is the elect and righteous who receive baptism and salvation in the Elysian field ("field of Akerosya, which is called Aneslasleya" in Ethiopic). [28]

The fragment of the Apocalypse of Peter held by the Bodleian Library Bodleian fragment Apocalypse of Peter MS. Gr. th. f. 4 (P).jpg
The fragment of the Apocalypse of Peter held by the Bodleian Library

Predecessors

Much of the original scholarship on the Apocalypse was on determining its predecessor influences. The first studies generally emphasized its roots in Hellenistic philosophy and thought. Nekiya, a work by Albrecht Dieterich published in 1893 on the basis of the Akhmim manuscript alone, identified parallels and links with the Orphic religious tradition and Greek cultural context. [29] Plato's Phaedo is often held as a major example of the forerunning Hellenistic beliefs on the nature of the afterlife that influenced the Apocalypse of Peter. [23] Later scholarship by Martha Himmelfarb and others has emphasized the strong Jewish roots of the Apocalypse of Peter as well; it seems that apocalypses were a popular genre among Jews after the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD. Much of the Apocalypse of Peter may be based on or influenced by these lost Jewish apocalypses, works such as the "Book of the Watchers" (chapters 1–36 of the Book of Enoch), and 1st–2nd-century Jewish thought in general. [30] [12] The book directly cites 4 Esdras. The author also appears to be familiar with the Gospel of Matthew and no other; a line in Chapter 16 has Peter realizing the meaning of the Beatitude quote that "Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness's sake, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven." [31]

The Apocalypse of Peter seems to quote from Ezekiel 37, the story of the Valley of Dry Bones. During its rendition of the ascension of Jesus, it also quotes from Psalm 24, which was considered as a messianic psalm foretelling the coming of Jesus and Christianity in the early church. The psalm is given a cosmological interpretation as a prophecy of Jesus's entry into heaven. [32]

The post-mortem baptism in the Acherousian lake was likely influenced by the Jewish cultural practice of washing the dead before the corpse is buried, a practice shared by early Christians. There was a linkage or analogy between cleansing the soul on death as well as cleaning the body, as the Apocalypse of Peter passage essentially combines the two. [28]

Contemporary work

The opening setting of the resurrected Jesus giving further insights to the Apostles, usually on a mountain, followed by an account of Jesus's ascension, appears to have been a popular setting in 2nd century Christian works. The genre is sometimes called a "dialogue Gospel", and is seen in works such as the Epistle of the Apostles, the Questions of Bartholomew, and various Gnostic works such as the Pistis Sophia. [31]

The Apocalypse of Peter also fits into the same genre as Clementine literature that was popular in Alexandria, stories that usually involved Peter and Clement of Rome having adventures, revelations, and dialogues together, despite Clement himself not appearing directly in the Apocalypse of Peter. The Ethiopic manuscripts found by Grébaut that included the Apocalypse of Peter were mixed in with other Ethiopic Clementine literature, which usually featured Peter prominently. [33]

Among work that was eventually canonized in the New Testament, the Apocalypse of Peter shows a close resemblance in ideas with the epistle 2 Peter, to the extent that many scholars believe one had copied passages from the other due to the number of close parallels. [34] [35] Conversely, the Apocalypse of Peter differs from the Apocalypse of John in putting far more stress on the afterlife and divine rewards and punishments than Revelation's focus on a cosmic battle between good and evil.

Later influence

The Apocalypse of Peter is the earliest surviving account of a detailed depiction of heaven and hell in a Christian context. Its depictions appear to have been quite influential to later works, although how much of this is due to the Apocalypse of Peter itself and how much due to lost similar literature is unclear. [9] [30]

The Sibylline Oracles, popular among Roman Christians, seems to directly quote the Apocalypse of Peter. [36] Macarius Magnes's Apocriticus, a 3rd-century Christian apologetic work, features "a pagan philosopher" who quotes the Apocalypse of Peter, albeit in an attempt to disprove Christianity. The visions narrated in the Acts of Thomas, a 3rd century work, also appear to quote or reference the Apocalypse of Peter. [37] [note 2] The bishop Methodius of Olympus appears to positively quote the Apocalypse of Peter in the 4th century, although it is uncertain whether he regarded it as scripture. [37]

The Apocalypse of Peter is one of the earliest examples of a Christian-Jewish katabasis, a genre of explicit depictions of heaven and hell. Later works inspired by it include the Apocalypse of Thomas in the 2nd–4th century, and more importantly, the Apocalypse of Paul in the 4th century. [6] One notable tweak that the Apocalypse of Paul makes is describing personal judgments to bliss or torment that happen immediately after death, rather than the Apocalypse of Peter being a vision of a future destiny that will take place after the Second Coming of Jesus. [37] [39] Despite a lack of official approval, the Apocalypse of Paul would go on to be popular and influential for centuries, possibly due to its popularity among the medieval monks that copied and preserved manuscripts in the turbulent centuries following the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Most famously, Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy would become extremely popular and celebrated in the 14th century and beyond. [6] Directly or indirectly, the Apocalypse of Peter was the parent and grandparent of these influential visions of the afterlife.

Literary merits

19th and 20th century scholars consider the work rather intellectually simple and naive; dramatic and gripping, but not necessarily a coherent story. Still, the Apocalypse of Peter was popular and seemed to have a wide audience in its time. [31] M. R. James remarked that his impression was that educated Christians of the later Roman period "realized it was a gross and vulgar book" which might have partially explained a lack of elite enthusiasm for canonizing it later. [40]

Debate over canonicity

Rainer fragment Apocalypse Peter 1 and 4.png
Rainer fragment Apocalypse Peter 2 and 3.png
The Rainer fragment, held by the Papyrus Collection of the Austrian National Library, which endorses the possibility of escape from the torments of Hell, a theological controversy in the 4th–5th centuries

The Apocalypse of Peter was ultimately not included in the New Testament, but appears to have been one of the borderline works that came closest to being included, along with the Shepherd of Hermas. [11] As discussed in dating the Apocalypse of Peter, the Muratorian fragment mentions the Apocalypse, but also states that some would not have it read in church. [41] Both the Apocalypse of Peter and the Apocalypse of John appear to have been controversial, with some churches of the 2nd and 3rd centuries using them and others not. Clement of Alexandria appears to have considered the Apocalypse of Peter to be holy scripture. Eusebius personally found the work dubious, but his book Church History describes a lost work of Clement's, the Hypotyposes (Outlines), that gave "abbreviated discussions of the whole of the registered divine writings, without passing over the disputed [writings] — I mean Jude and the rest of the general letters, and the Letter of Barnabas, and the so-called Apocalypse of Peter." [42] [43] The Stichometry of Nicephorus lists both the Apocalypses of Peter and John as used if disputed books. [17] Although the numerous references to it attest that it was in wide circulation in the 2nd century, the Apocalypse of Peter was ultimately not accepted into the Christian canon. The reason why is not entirely clear, although considering the reservations various church authors had on the Apocalypse of John (that is, the Book of Revelation), likely similar considerations were in play. As late as the 5th century, Sozomen indicates that some churches in Palestine used it in his time, but by then, it seems to have been considered inauthentic by most Christians. [37]

One hypothesis for why the Apocalypse of Peter failed to gain enough support to be canonized is that its view on the afterlife was too close to endorsing Christian universalism. The passage in the Rainer Fragment that dead saints, seeing the torment of sinners and heretics from heaven, could ask God for mercy, and these damned souls could be retroactively baptized and saved, had significant theological implications. Presumably, all of hell could eventually be emptied in such a manner; M. R. James suggested that the original Apocalypse of Peter may well have suggested universal salvation after a period of cleansing suffering in hell. [9] This ran against the stance of many Church theologians of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th centuries who strongly felt that salvation and damnation were eternal and strictly based on actions and beliefs while alive. Augustine of Hippo, in his work City of God , specifically advocates against arguments based on similar logic to what is seen in the Rainer passage. [44] Such a system, where saints could at least pray their friends and family out of hell, and possibly any damned soul, would have been considered incorrect at best, and heretical at worst to these views. Bart Ehrman agrees with James and proposes that the Rainer fragment reading was the original one; and that this passage was not copied by later scribes who felt it was in error, hence not appearing in later manuscripts. He believes that the damage to the book's reputation was already done, however. The Origenist Controversies of the 4th and 5th centuries retroactively condemned much of the thought of Origen, particularly his belief in universal salvation, and this anti-Origen movement was at least part of why the book was not included in later canon lists. [45]

Notes

  1. ↑ Bauckham's argument supporting composition by a Jewish-Christian author in Palestine during the Bar Kochba revolt is that the text speaks of a single false messiah who has not yet been exposed as false. The reference to the false messiah as a "liar" may be a Hebrew pun turning Bar Kochba's original name, Bar Kosiba, into Bar Koziba, "son of the lie". More generally, the writer seems to write from a position of persecution, condemning those who caused the deaths of martyrs by their lies, and Bar Kochba is reputed to have punished and killed Christians. Scholars who have found Bauckham's argument convincing include Oskar Skarsaune, although this suggestion is not accepted by all. [13] [11] [14] [9]
  2. ↑ This opinion is not unanimous; Martha Himmelfarb argues that both the Acts of Thomas and the Apocalypse of Peter are drawing on the same early Jewish traditions to explain the similarities. [38]

Related Research Articles

The New Testament (NT) is the second division of the Christian biblical canon. It discusses the teachings and person of Jesus, as well as events relating to first-century Christianity. The New Testament's background, the first division of the Christian Bible, is called the Old Testament, which is based primarily upon the Hebrew Bible; together they are regarded as sacred scripture by Christians.

In Greek mythology, Acherusia was a name given by the ancients to several lakes or swamps, which, like the various rivers called Acheron, were at some time believed to be connected with the underworld, until at last the Acherusia came to be considered to be in the lower world itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Book of Jubilees</span> Ancient Jewish religious work of 50 chapters

The Book of Jubilees, sometimes called Lesser Genesis or Leptogenesis, is an ancient Jewish apocryphal text of 50 chapters, considered canonical by the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church as well as Beta Israel, where it is known as the Book of Division. Jubilees is considered one of the pseudepigrapha by the Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant churches. Apart from the Beta Israel community, the book is not considered canonical within any of the denominations of Judaism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muratorian fragment</span> Ancient list of books of the New Testament

The Muratorian fragment, also known as the Muratorian Canon, is a copy of perhaps the oldest known list of most of the books of the New Testament. The fragment, consisting of 85 lines, is a Latin manuscript bound in a roughly 8th-century codex from the library of Columbanus's monastery at Bobbio Abbey; it contains features suggesting it is a translation from a Greek original written about 170. Other scholars suggest it might have been originally written as late as the 4th century, although this is not the consensus opinion. Both the degraded condition of the manuscript and the poor Latin in which it was written have made it difficult to translate. The beginning of the fragment is missing, and it ends abruptly. The fragment consists of all that remains of a section of a list of all the works that were accepted as canonical by the churches known to its original compiler.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Book of Enoch</span> Hebrew religious text ascribed to Enoch

The Book of Enoch is an ancient Hebrew apocalyptic religious text, ascribed by tradition to the patriarch Enoch who was the father of Methuselah and the great-grandfather of Noah. The Book of Enoch contains unique material on the origins of demons and Nephilim, why some angels fell from heaven, an explanation of why the Genesis flood was morally necessary, and a prophetic exposition of the thousand-year reign of the Messiah. Three books are traditionally attributed to Enoch, including the distinct works 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pseudepigrapha</span> Falsely attributed works

Pseudepigrapha are falsely attributed works, texts whose claimed author is not the true author, or a work whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past. The name of the author to whom the work is falsely attributed is often prefixed with the particle "pseudo-", such as for example "pseudo-Aristotle" or "pseudo-Dionysius": these terms refer to the anonymous authors of works falsely attributed to Aristotle and Dionysius the Areopagite, respectively.

The Life of Adam and Eve, also known in its Greek version as the Apocalypse of Moses, is a Jewish apocryphal group of writings. It recounts the lives of Adam and Eve from after their expulsion from the Garden of Eden to their deaths. It provides more detail about the Fall of Man, including Eve's version of the story. Satan explains that he rebelled when God commanded him to bow down to Adam. After Adam dies, he and all his descendants are promised a resurrection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macarius Magnes</span>

Macarius Magnes, sometimes referred to as Macarius of Magnesia, is the author of a work of Christian apologetics contesting the writings of a Neo-Platonic philosopher. He was unknown for centuries until the discovery of a manuscript at Athens in 1867. This work is called Ἀποκριτικός πρὸς Ἕλληνας in Greek, and Apocriticus in Latin. It agrees in its dogmatics with Gregory of Nyssa, and is valuable on account of the numerous excerpts from the writings of the pagan opponent of Macarius. Macarius does not directly name the "Hellene" he is quoting from and criticizing, but it is most commonly speculated to be the philosopher Porphyry, who wrote a lost work called Against the Christians. The other named possibility mentioned is Hierocles's the Lover of Truth. It is also possible that whoever this opponent was, their name was lost to history and otherwise unrecorded in surviving documents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Testament apocrypha</span> Writings by early Christians, not included in the Biblical Canon

The New Testament apocrypha are a number of writings by early Christians that give accounts of Jesus and his teachings, the nature of God, or the teachings of his apostles and of their lives. Some of these writings were cited as scripture by early Christians, but since the fifth century a widespread consensus has emerged limiting the New Testament to the 27 books of the modern canon. Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Protestant churches generally do not view the New Testament apocrypha as part of the Bible.

<i>History of Joseph the Carpenter</i> Compilation of traditions concerning the family of Jesus

The History of Joseph the Carpenter is a compilation of traditions concerning Mary, Joseph, and the Holy Family, probably composed in Byzantine Egypt in Greek in the late sixth or early seventh centuries, but surviving only in Coptic and Arabic language translation. The text bears witness to the belief in the perpetual virginity of Mary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter</span> Gnostic Christian text (c. 200 CE)

The Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter, also known as the Coptic Apocalypse of Peter and Revelation of Peter, is the third tractate in Codex VII of the Nag Hammadi library. The work is part of Gnosticism, a sect of early Christianity, and is considered part of the New Testament apocrypha. The work was likely originally written in the Koine Greek language and composed around 200 CE. The surviving manuscript from Nag Hammadi is a poor-quality translation of the Greek into Coptic, and likely dates from the 4th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apocalypse of Paul</span> 4th-century Christian text

The Apocalypse of Paul is a fourth-century non-canonical apocalypse and part of the New Testament apocrypha. The full original Greek version of the Apocalypse is lost, although fragmentary versions still exist. Using later versions and translations, the text has been reconstructed, notably from Latin and Syriac translations, the earliest being a seventh-century Iranian Syriac codex known as Fonds Issayi 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epistula Apostolorum</span> Work of New Testament apocrypha

The Epistle of the Apostles is a work of New Testament apocrypha. Despite its name, it is more a gospel or an apocalypse than an epistle. The work takes the form of an open letter purportedly from the remaining eleven apostles describing key events of the life of Jesus, followed by a dialogue between the resurrected Jesus and the apostles where Jesus reveals apocalyptic secrets of reality and the future. It is 51 chapters long. The epistle was likely written in the 2nd century CE in Koine Greek, but was lost for many centuries. A partial Coptic language manuscript was discovered in 1895, a more complete Ethiopic language manuscript was published in 1913, and a full Coptic-Ethiopic-German edition was published in 1919.

The Second Book of Enoch is a pseudepigraphic text in the apocalyptic genre. It describes the ascent of the patriarch Enoch, ancestor of Noah, through ten heavens of an Earth-centered cosmos. The Slavonic edition and translation of 2 Enoch is of Christian origin in the 8th century but is based on an earlier work. 2 Enoch is distinct from the Book of Enoch, known as 1 Enoch, and there is also an unrelated 3 Enoch, although none of the three books are considered canonical scripture by the majority of Jewish or Christian bodies. The numbering of these texts has been applied by scholars to distinguish each from the others.

<i>Ascension of Isaiah</i> Pseudepigraphical Judeo-Christian text

The Ascension of Isaiah is a pseudepigraphical Judeo-Christian text. Scholarly estimates regarding the date of the Ascension of Isaiah range from 70 AD to 175 AD. Many scholars believe it to be a compilation of several texts completed by an unknown Christian scribe who claimed to be the Prophet Isaiah, while an increasing number of scholars in recent years have argued that the work is a unity by a single author that may have utilized multiple sources.

The Apocalypse of Zephaniah is a 1st-century pseudepigraphic Jewish text attributed to the Biblical Zephaniah and so associated with the Old Testament, but not regarded as scripture by Jews or any Christian group. It was rediscovered and published at the end of the 19th century. The canonical Book of Zephaniah has much mystical and apocalyptic imagery, and this apocalyptic-style text deals with a similar subject.

A biblical manuscript is any handwritten copy of a portion of the text of the Bible. Biblical manuscripts vary in size from tiny scrolls containing individual verses of the Jewish scriptures to huge polyglot codices containing both the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and the New Testament, as well as extracanonical works.

The Apocalypse of Peter or Vision of Peter, also known as the Book of the Rolls and other titles, is a Miaphysite Christian work probably written in the 10th century; the late 9th century and 11th century are also considered plausible. Around 40 manuscripts of it have been preserved and found. It is pseudepigraphically attributed to Clement of Rome, relating a vision experienced by the Apostle Peter of the resurrected Jesus; the actual author is unknown. The work was originally written in Arabic; many Ethiopic manuscripts exist as well, with the reworked Ethiopic version in the work Clement along with other stories of Clementine literature.

<i>Ethiopic Apocalypse of Ezra</i> Apocalypse written in Geʿez (Ethiopic)

The Ethiopic Apocalypse of Ezra, also called the Falasha Apocalypse of Ezra, is an apocalypse written in Geʿez (Ethiopic) that circulated among the Beta Israel (Falasha) and foretold the divine destruction of Islam.

References

  1. ↑
    • The Greek Akhmim text was printed originally in:
    • Bouriant, Urbain (1892). "Fragments du texte grec du livre d'Enoch et de quelques écrits attribués à Saint Pierre". Mémoires publiés par les membres de la mission archéologique au Caire. IX.1 (in French). pp. 142–147.
    • Photographs are published in:
    • Lods, Adolphe (1893). "L'Evangile et l'Apocalypse de Pierre". In Leroux, Ernest (ed.). Mémoires publiés par les membres de la mission archéologique au Caire. IX.3 (in French). Ernest Leroux, Paris. pp. 224–228, plates II–VI.
  2. 1 2 Van Minnen, Peter (2003). "The Greek Apocalypse of Peter". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 17–28. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  3. ↑ The Ethiopic text, with a French translation, was published in:
    Grébaut, Sylvain (1910). "Littérature éthiopienne pseudo-Clémentine". Revue de l'Orient Chrétien (in French). 15: 198–214, 307–323, 425–439.
  4. 1 2 Bauckham 1998 , pp. 162–163
  5. ↑
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Maurer, Christian (1965) [1964]. Schneemelcher, Wilhelm (ed.). New Testament Apocrypha: Volume Two: Writings Relating to the Apostles; Apocalypses and Related Subjects. Translated by Wilson, Robert McLachlan. Philadelphia: Westminster Press. pp. 663–668. Translation from Ethiopian to German is by Hugo Duensing.
  7. ↑ Bauckham 1998 , pp. 147, 162
  8. ↑ Buchholz 1988 , pp. 429–430
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Elliott, James Keith (1993). "The Apocalypse of Peter". In Elliott, J. K. (ed.). The Apocryphal New Testament. Oxford University Press. p. 593–595. doi:10.1093/0198261829.003.0032. ISBN   0-19-826182-9.
  10. ↑ Ehrman 2022 , pp. 144–151
  11. 1 2 3 Bauckham 1998, pp. 160–161
  12. 1 2 Bremmer, Jan (2003). "The Apocalypse of Peter: Greek or Jewish?". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 1–14. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  13. ↑ Skarsaune, Oskar (2007). Skarsaune, Oskar; Hvalvik, Reidar (eds.). Jewish Believers in Jesus. Hendrickson Publishers. pp. 384–388. ISBN   978-1-56563-763-4.
  14. ↑ Tigchellaar, Eibert (2003). "Is the Liar Bar-Kochba? Considering the Date and Provenance of the Greek (Ethiopic) Apocalypse of Peter". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 63–77. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  15. ↑ The canonic New Testament context of this image is discussed under Figs in the Bible; Richard Bauckham, "The Two Fig Tree Parables in the Apocalypse of Peter", Journal of Biblical Literature104.2 (June 1985:269–287), shows correspondences with wording of the Matthean text that does not appear in the parallel passages in the synoptic gospels of Mark and Luke.
  16. 1 2 Bauckham 1998 , pp. 164–168
  17. 1 2 Ehrman, Bart (2012). Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. Oxford University Press. pp. 457–465. ISBN   9780199928033.
  18. 1 2 Czachesz, István (2003). "The Grotesque Body in the Apocalypse of Peter". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 111–114. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  19. ↑ Fiensy, David (1983). "Lex Talionis in the 'Apocalypse of Peter'". The Harvard Theological Review. 76 (2): 255–258. doi:10.1017/S0017816000001334. JSTOR   1509504. It is possible that where there is no logical correspondence, the punishment has come from the Orphic tradition and has simply been clumsily attached to a vice by a Jewish redactor.
  20. ↑ Ehrman 2022 , pp. 78–79. Note that Ehrman contests the scholarly opinion of the use of lex talionis, and considers the work as being more about bodily correspondence. For Ehrman, the punishments described are far more severe than the original crime - which goes against the idea of punishments being commensurate to the damage or pain done within "an eye for an eye."
  21. ↑ Bauckham 1998 , pp. 194–197
  22. ↑ Bauckham 1998 , pp. 221–223
  23. 1 2 Adamik, Tamás (2003). "The Description of Paradise in the Apocalypse of Peter". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 78–89. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Bauckham 1998 , pp. 145–146, 232–235
  25. ↑ Charlesworth, James, ed. (1983). "The Sibylline Oracles". The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha Volume 1. Translated by Collins, John J. Doubleday. p. 353. ISBN   0-385-09630-5.
  26. ↑ James, M. R. (April 1931). "The Rainer Fragment of the Apocalypse of Peter". The Journal of Theological Studies. os–XXXII (127): 270–279. doi:10.1093/jts/os-XXXII.127.270.
  27. 1 2 Bauckham 1998 , pp. 147–148
  28. 1 2 Copeland, Kirsti B. (2003). "Sinners and Post-Mortem 'Baptism' in the Acherusian Lake". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 91–107. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  29. ↑ Dieterich, Albrecht (1893). Nekyia: Beiträge zur Erklärung der neuentdeckten Petrusapokalypse [Nekyia: Contributions to the understanding of the newly-discovered Apocalypse of Peter] (in German).
  30. 1 2 Himmelfarb, Martha (1983). Tours of Hell: An Apocalyptic Form in Jewish and Christian Literature. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 8–11, 16–17, 41–45, 66–69, 127, 169–171. ISBN   0-8122-7882-8.
  31. 1 2 3 Bauckham 1998 , pp. 168–174, 208–209
  32. ↑ Van Ruiten, Jacques (2003). "The Old Testament Quotations in the Apocalypse of Peter". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 158–173. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  33. ↑ Pesthy, Monika (2003). ""Thy Mercy, O Lord, is in the Heavens; and thy Righteousness Reaches unto the Clouds". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 40–51. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  34. ↑ Bauckham 1998 , pp. 290–303
  35. ↑ Bremmer, Jan (2024). "The Apocalypse of Peter, 2 Peter and Sibylline Oracles II. Alexandrian Debates?". In Maier, Daniel C.; Frey, Jörg; Kraus, Thomas J. (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter in Context (PDF). Studies on Early Christian Apocrypha 21. Peeters. pp. 153–177. doi: 10.2143/9789042952096 . ISBN   978-90-429-5208-9.
  36. ↑ Specifically Sibylline Oracles Book 2, verse 225 and following. See Collins 1983 for a translation.
  37. 1 2 3 4 Jakab, Attila (2003). "The Reception of the Apocalypse of Peter in Ancient Christianity". In Bremmer, Jan N.; Czachesz, István (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter. Peeters Publishers. pp. 174–186. ISBN   90-429-1375-4.
  38. ↑ Himmelfarb 1983, pp. 12–13
  39. ↑ Fiori, Emiliano B. (2024). "'Close and yet so faraway': The Apocalypse of Peter and the Apocalypse of Paul". In Maier, Daniel C.; Frey, Jörg; Kraus, Thomas J. (eds.). The Apocalypse of Peter in Context (PDF). Studies on Early Christian Apocrypha 21. Peeters. doi: 10.2143/9789042952096 . ISBN   978-90-429-5208-9.
  40. ↑ Ehrman 2022 , pp. 188–189
  41. ↑ Metzger, Bruce (1987). The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 191–201, 305–307. ISBN   0-19-826954-4.
  42. ↑ Eusebius of Caesarea (2019) [c. 320s]. "Book 6, Chapter 14". The History of the Church . Translated by Schott, Jeremy M. Oakland, California: University of California Press. p. 297. ISBN   9780520964969.
  43. ↑ See Clement 41.1–2, 48.1, and 49.1, which correspond with the Ethiopian text.
    James, Montague Rhodes (1924). The Apocryphal New Testament  . Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 506 – via Wikisource. [ scan   Wikisource-logo.svg ]
  44. ↑ Bauckham 1998 , pp. 157–159; Beck 2019 , pp. 176–177. According to Augustine, the saints in heaven will have their will fully aligned with God, and thus would never want to oppose God's will that the damned be punished, so they would never pray for the salvation of the damned as they do in the Apocalypse of Peter.
  45. ↑ Ehrman 2022 , pp. 178–181, 198–211. See also the blog posts at Ehrman, Bart (January 30, 2019). "The Aberrant View of the Afterlife in the Apocalypse of Peter". The Bart Ehrman Blog: The History & Literature of Early Christianity. Retrieved January 27, 2022. and Finally. Why Did the Apocalypse of Peter Not Make It Into the Canon?

Bibliography

Further reading

Modern English translations of the Apocalypse of Peter can be found in:

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.