Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Signed | 10 June 1958 |
Location | New York City, United States |
Effective | 7 June 1959 |
Condition | 3 ratifications |
Signatories | 24 |
Parties | 172 |
Depositaries | Secretary-General of the United Nations |
Languages | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish |
Full text | |
![]() |
Contract law |
---|
![]() |
Formation |
Defences |
Interpretation |
Dispute resolution |
Rights of third parties |
Breach of contract |
Remedies |
Quasi-contractual obligations |
Duties of parties |
|
Related areas of law |
By jurisdiction |
|
Other law areas |
Notes |
|
The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, commonly known as the New York Convention, was adopted by a United Nations diplomatic conference on 10 June 1958 and entered into force on 7 June 1959. The Convention requires courts of contracting states to give effect to private agreements to arbitrate and to recognize and enforce arbitration awards made in other contracting states. Widely considered the foundational instrument for international arbitration, it applies to arbitrations that are not considered as domestic awards in the state where recognition and enforcement is sought.
The New York Convention is very successful. Nowadays many countries have adopted arbitration laws based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. This works with the New York Convention so that the provisions on making an enforceable award, or asking a court to set it aside or not enforce it, are the same under the Model Law and the New York Convention. The Model Law does not replace the Convention; it works with it. An award made in a country which is not a signatory to the Convention cannot take advantage of the Convention to enforce that award in the 169 contracting states unless there is bilateral recognition, whether or not the arbitration was held under the provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law.
In 1953, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) produced the first draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards to the United Nations Economic and Social Council. With slight modifications, the council submitted the convention to the International Conference in the Spring of 1958. The Conference was chaired by Willem Schurmann, the Dutch Permanent Representative to the United Nations and Oscar Schachter, a leading figure in international law who later taught at Columbia Law School and the Columbia School of International and Public Affairs, and served as the President of the American Society of International Law.
International arbitration is an increasingly popular means of alternative dispute resolution for cross-border commercial transactions. The primary advantage of arbitration over court litigation is enforceability: an arbitration award is enforceable in most countries in the world. Other advantages of arbitration include the ability to select a neutral forum to resolve disputes, that arbitration awards are final and not ordinarily subject to appeal, the ability to choose flexible procedures for the arbitration, and confidentiality.
Once a dispute between parties is settled, the winning party needs to collect the award or judgment. If the loser voluntarily pays, no court action is necessary. [1] Otherwise, unless the assets of the losing party are located in the country where the court judgment was rendered, the winning party needs to obtain a court judgment in the jurisdiction where the other party resides or where its assets are located. Unless there is a treaty on recognition of court judgments between the country where the judgment is rendered and the country where the winning party seeks to collect, the winning party will be unable to use the court judgment to collect.
Public information on overall and specific arbitration cases is quite limited as there is no need to involve the courts at all unless there is a dispute, and in most cases the loser pays voluntarily. [1] A review of disputed cases in China found that from 2000 to 2011, the Supreme People's Court upheld the refusal to enforce the arbitration agreement in 17 cases due to a provision in Article V of the convention (China has an automatic appeal system to the highest court, so this includes all such refusals). [2]
Under the convention, an arbitration award issued in any other state can generally be freely enforced in any other contracting state, only subject to certain, limited defenses. These defenses are: [3]
Additionally, there are three types of reservations that countries may apply: [4]
States may make any or all of the above reservations. Because there are two similar issues conflated under the term "reciprocity", it is important to determine which such reservation (or both) an enforcing state has made.
As of January 2023, the convention has 172 state parties, which includes 169 of the 193 United Nations member states plus the Cook Islands, the Holy See, and the State of Palestine. Twenty-four UN member states have not yet adopted the convention. In addition, Taiwan has not been permitted to adopt the convention (but generally enforces foreign arbitration judgments) and a number of British Overseas Territories have not had the Convention extended to them by Order in Council. British Overseas Territories to which the New York Convention has not yet been extended by Order in Council are: Anguilla, Falkland Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Montserrat, Saint Helena (including Ascension and Tristan da Cunha).
State | Date of Adoption | State | Date of Adoption |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | 30 November 2005 | ![]() | 27 June 2001 |
![]() | 7 February 1989 | ![]() | 19 June 2015 |
![]() | 6 March 2017 | ||
![]() | 2 February 1989 | ![]() | 14 March 1989 |
![]() | 29 December 1997 | ![]() | 26 March 1975 |
![]() | 2 May 1961 | ![]() | 29 February 2000 |
![]() | 20 December 2006 | ![]() | 6 April 1988 |
![]() | 6 May 1992 | ![]() | 16 March 1993 |
![]() | 15 November 1960 | ![]() | 18 August 1975 |
![]() | 15 March 2021 | ||
![]() | 16 May 1974 | ![]() | 25 September 2014 |
![]() | 28 April 1995 | ![]() | 1 September 1993 |
![]() | 20 December 1971 | ![]() | 7 June 2002 |
![]() | 25 July 1996 | ![]() | 10 October 1961 |
![]() | 23 March 1987 | ![]() | 23 June 2014 |
![]() | 5 January 1960 | ![]() | 19 February 1988 |
![]() | 12 May 1986 | ![]() | 22 March 2018 |
![]() | 15 October 1962 | ||
![]() | 4 September 1975 | ![]() | 22 January 1987 |
![]() | 25 September 1979 | ![]() | 5 November 2014 |
![]() | 28 April 2015 | ![]() | 26 October 1987 |
![]() | 1 February 1991 | ![]() | 12 January 2009 |
![]() | 26 July 1993 | ![]() | 30 December 1974 |
![]() | 29 December 1980 | ![]() | 30 September 1993 |
![]() | 22 December 1972 | ![]() | 14 June 1983 |
![]() | 28 October 1988 | ![]() | 11 April 2002 |
![]() | 3 January 1962 | ![]() | 9 March 1959 |
![]() | 10 June 1958 | ![]() | 30 August 1993 |
![]() | 24 August 2020 | ![]() | 26 December 2010 |
![]() | 19 January 1962 | ![]() | 26 June 1959 |
![]() | 15 December 2006 | ![]() | 2 June 1994 |
![]() | 30 June 1961 | ![]() | 9 April 1968 |
![]() | 16 July 1962 | ![]() | 21 March 1984 |
![]() | 23 January 1991 | ![]() | 25 September 2014 |
![]() | 5 December 1983 | ![]() | 14 May 1975 |
![]() | 3 October 2000 | ![]() | 5 March 1962 |
![]() | 24 January 2002 | ![]() | 13 July 1960 |
![]() | 7 October 1981 | ![]() | 15 October 2001 |
![]() | 11 November 2021 | ![]() | 12 May 1981 |
![]() | 5 January 1959 | ![]() | 31 January 1969 |
![]() | 10 July 2002 | ![]() | 20 June 1961 |
![]() | 15 November 1979 | ![]() | 20 November 1995 |
![]() | 10 February 1989 | ![]() | 8 February 1973 |
![]() | 28 April 1978 | ![]() | 18 December 1996 |
![]() | 17 June 1998 | ![]() | 14 April 1992 |
![]() | 11 August 1998 | ![]() | 13 June 1989 |
![]() | 16 September 2005 | ![]() | 14 March 1995 |
![]() | 5 October 2011 | ![]() | 9 September 1983 |
![]() | 10 March 1994 | ![]() | 16 July 1962 |
![]() | 5 November 1985 | ![]() | 4 March 2021 |
![]() | 17 September 2019 | ![]() | 8 September 1994 |
![]() | 22 June 2000 | ![]() | 21 December 2006 |
![]() | 30 January 1997 | ![]() | 19 June 1996 |
![]() | 14 April 1971 | ![]() | 18 September 1998 |
![]() | 2 June 1982 | ![]() | 24 October 1994 |
![]() | 23 October 2006 | ![]() | 12 February 1959 |
![]() | 11 June 1998 | ![]() | 16 April 2013 |
![]() | 4 March 1998 | ![]() | 24 April 1964 |
![]() | 6 January 1983 | ![]() | 24 September 2003 |
![]() | 14 October 1964 | ![]() | 17 March 1970 |
![]() | 14 March 1961 | ![]() | 25 February 1999 |
![]() | 14 July 2005 | ![]() | 31 March 2020 |
![]() | 2 January 2015 | ![]() | 10 October 1984 |
![]() | 17 July 2019 | ![]() | 8 October 1997 |
![]() | 7 July 1988 | ![]() | 6 July 1967 |
![]() | 3 October 1961 | ![]() | 18 October 1994 |
![]() | 30 December 2002 | ![]() | 13 September 1961 |
![]() | 24 August 1960 | ![]() | 31 October 2008 |
![]() | 12 September 2000 | ![]() | 17 May 1979 |
![]() | 20 November 2012 | ![]() | 19 April 1994 |
![]() | 17 October 1994 | ![]() | 12 March 2001 |
![]() | 3 February 2020 | ![]() | 28 October 2020 |
![]() | 21 August 1986 | ![]() | 28 May 1993 |
![]() | 6 July 1992 | ![]() | 3 May 1976 |
![]() | 12 May 1977 | ![]() | 9 April 1962 |
![]() | 26 March 2018 | ![]() | 28 January 1972 |
![]() | 10 November 2022 | ||
![]() | 1 June 1965 | ![]() | 9 March 1959 |
![]() | 13 October 1964 | ![]() | 14 August 2012 |
![]() | 21 December 1959 | ![]() | 17 January 2023 |
![]() | 12 June 2020 | ![]() | 14 February 1966 |
![]() | 17 July 1967 | ![]() | 2 July 1992 |
![]() | 4 May 2022 | ![]() | 12 February 1992 |
![]() | 10 October 1960 | ![]() | 21 August 2006 |
![]() | 24 September 1975 | ![]() | 30 September 1970 |
![]() | 30 March 1983 | ![]() | 7 February 1996 |
![]() | 8 February 1995 | ![]() | 12 September 1995 |
![]() | 14 March 2002 | ![]() | 26 September 1994 |
The convention has also been extended to a number of British Crown Dependencies, Overseas Territories, Overseas departments, Unincorporated Territories and other subsidiary territories of sovereign states.
Under American law, the recognition of foreign arbitral awards is governed by chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, which incorporates the New York Convention. [5]
Therefore, the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "Convention") preempts state law. In Foster v. Neilson , the Supreme Court held "Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land. It is, consequently, to be regarded in courts of justice as equivalent to an act of the Legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision." [6] Thus, over a course of 181 years, the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that a self-executing treaty is an act of the Legislature (i.e., act of Congress).
With specific regard to the New York Convention, at least one court discussed, but ultimately avoided, the issue of whether the treaty is self-executing. The court nonetheless held that the convention was, at the least, an implemented non-self-executing treaty that still had legal force as a treaty (as distinguished from an Act of Congress). [7] Based on that determination, the court held that the Convention preempted state law that sought to void arbitration clauses in international reinsurance treaties.
Arbitration, in the context of the law of the United States, is a form of alternative dispute resolution. Specifically, arbitration is an alternative to litigation through which the parties to a dispute agree to submit their respective evidence and legal arguments to a neutral third party for resolution. In practice arbitration is generally used as a substitute for litigation, particularly when the judicial process is perceived as too slow, expensive or biased. In some contexts, an arbitrator may be described as an umpire.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is a non-UN intergovernmental organization located in The Hague, Netherlands. Unlike a judicial court in the traditional sense, the PCA provides services of arbitral tribunal to resolve disputes that arise out of international agreements between member states, international organizations or private parties. The cases span a range of legal issues involving territorial and maritime boundaries, sovereignty, human rights, international investment, and international and regional trade. The PCA is constituted through two separate multilateral conventions with a combined membership of 122 states. It is not a United Nations agency, but a United Nations observer.
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is a subsidiary body of the U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) responsible for helping to facilitate international trade and investment.
The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is an international arbitration institution established in 1966 for legal dispute resolution and conciliation between international investors and States. ICSID is part of and funded by the World Bank Group, headquartered in Washington, D.C., in the United States. It is an autonomous, multilateral specialized institution to encourage international flow of investment and mitigate non-commercial risks by a treaty drafted by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development's executive directors and signed by member countries. As of May 2016, 153 contracting member states agreed to enforce and uphold arbitral awards in accordance with the ICSID Convention.
In law, the enforcement of foreign judgments is the recognition and enforcement in one jurisdiction of judgments rendered in another ("foreign") jurisdiction. Foreign judgments may be recognized based on bilateral or multilateral treaties or understandings, or unilaterally without an express international agreement.
The Brussels Regime is a set of rules regulating which courts have jurisdiction in legal disputes of a civil or commercial nature between individuals resident in different member states of the European Union (EU) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). It has detailed rules assigning jurisdiction for the dispute to be heard and governs the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.
International arbitration is arbitration between companies or individuals in different states, usually by including a provision for future disputes in a contract.
An arbitration award is a determination on the merits by an arbitration tribunal in an arbitration, and is analogous to a judgment in a court of law. It is referred to as an 'award' even where all of the claimant's claims fail, or the award is of a non-monetary nature.
Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that resolves disputes outside the judiciary courts. The dispute will be decided by one or more persons, which renders the 'arbitration award'. An arbitration decision or award is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in the courts, unless all parties stipulate that the arbitration process and decision are non-binding.
An arbitral tribunal or arbitration tribunal, also arbitration commission, arbitration committee or arbitration council is a panel of unbiased adjudicators which is convened and sits to resolve a dispute by way of arbitration. The tribunal may consist of a sole arbitrator, or there may be two or more arbitrators, which might include a chairperson or an umpire. Members selected to serve on an arbitration panel are typically professionals with expertise in both law and in friendly dispute resolution (mediation). Some scholars have suggested that the ideal composition of an arbitration commission should include at least also one professional in the field of the disputed situation, in cases that involve questions of asset or damages valuation for instance an economist.
A contract is an agreement that specifies certain legally enforceable rights and obligations pertaining to two or more mutually agreeing parties. A contract typically involves the transfer of goods, services, money, or a promise to transfer any of those at a future date, and the activities and intentions of the parties entering into a contract may be referred to as contracting. In the event of a breach of contract, the injured party may seek judicial remedies such as damages or rescission. A binding agreement between actors in international law is known as a treaty.
Justice Jean-Paul Beraudo is a lawyer, academic and author of legal works. He was Justice at the French Supreme Court and vice-chairman of the International Court of Arbitration. He lectures on International Private Law and International Trade Law at Panthéon-Sorbonne University and on Company law at Sciences-Po, Paris. The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) appointed him correspondent for France and a member of the scientific committee.
Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) or investment court system (ICS) is a system through which countries can be sued by foreign investors for certain state actions affecting foreign direct investment (FDI). This system most often takes the form of international arbitration between a foreign investor and the nation receiving the FDI.
Albert Jan van den Berg is a founding partner of Hanotiau & van den Berg in Brussels, an Emeritus Professor of Law at the Erasmus University, Rotterdam, a visiting professor at Georgetown University Law Center, Washington DC and at the University of TsinghuaArchived 2018-08-10 at the Wayback Machine School of Law, Beijing and a member of the Advisory Board and Faculty of the Geneva Master of Laws in International Dispute Settlement (MIDS), Geneva.
The Arbitration Act 1996 is an Act of Parliament which regulates arbitration proceedings within the jurisdiction of England and Wales and Northern Ireland.
The United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts is a treaty that aims at facilitating the use of electronic communications in international trade. It was prepared by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 23 November 2005. Pursuant to Article 23, it entered into force on 1 March 2013, the first day of the month after six months passed following adoption by three States parties, namely the Dominican Republic, Honduras, and Singapore.
The Hague choice of court convention, formally the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, is an international treaty concluded within the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It was concluded in 2005, and entered into force on 1 October 2015. The European Union, Denmark, Mexico, Singapore, Ukraine and the United Kingdom are parties to the convention. China, Israel, North Macedonia, Ukraine and the United States signed the convention, but did not ratify.
Arbitration in the British Virgin Islands is regulated principally by the Arbitration Act, 2013 which came into force on 1 October 2014. Prior to that date, arbitration was regulated by the Arbitration Cap, 1976.
Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co. v.Societe Generale d L'Industrie du Papier(RAKTA), 508 F.2d 969 (1974) is a United States Circuit Court Case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that although US courts can generally decide that arbitral judgments should not be enforced for public policy reasons, that exception should be construed very narrowly.
The Hague Judgments Convention, formally the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters is an international treaty concluded within the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It was concluded in 2019, and entered into force on 1 September 2023 for the European Union and Ukraine. The convention governs the recognition of judgements in civil and commercial matters.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)