Financial risk management

Last updated

Institutions

Certifications

Financial risk management is the practice of protecting economic value in a firm by managing exposure to financial risk - principally credit risk and market risk, with more specific variants as listed aside - as well as some aspects of operational risk. As for risk management more generally, financial risk management requires identifying the sources of risk, measuring these, and crafting plans to mitigate them. [1] [2] See Finance § Risk management for an overview.

Contents

Financial risk management as a "science" can be said to have been born [3] with modern portfolio theory, particularly as initiated by Professor Harry Markowitz in 1952 with his article, "Portfolio Selection"; [4] see Mathematical finance § Risk and portfolio management: the P world.

The discipline can be qualitative and quantitative; as a specialization of risk management, however, financial risk management focuses more on when and how to hedge, [5] often using financial instruments to manage costly exposures to risk. [6]

In all cases, the last "line of defence" against risk is capital, "as it ensures that a firm can continue as a going concern even if substantial and unexpected losses are incurred". [12]

Economic perspective

Neoclassical finance theory prescribes that (1) a firm should take on a project only if it increases shareholder value. [13] Further, the theory suggests that (2) firm managers cannot create value for shareholders or investors by taking on projects that shareholders could do for themselves at the same cost; see Theory of the firm and Fisher separation theorem.

Given these, there is therefore a fundamental debate relating to "Risk Management" and shareholder value. [5] [14] [15] The discussion essentially weighs the value of risk management in a market versus the cost of bankruptcy in that market: per the Modigliani and Miller framework, hedging is irrelevant since diversified shareholders are assumed to not care about firm-specific risks, whereas, on the other hand hedging is seen to create value in that it reduces the probability of financial distress.

When applied to financial risk management, this implies that firm managers should not hedge risks that investors can hedge for themselves at the same cost. [5] This notion is captured in the so-called "hedging irrelevance proposition": [16] "In a perfect market, the firm cannot create value by hedging a risk when the price of bearing that risk within the firm is the same as the price of bearing it outside of the firm."

In practice, however, financial markets are not likely to be perfect markets. [17] [18] [19] [20] This suggests that firm managers likely have many opportunities to create value for shareholders using financial risk management, wherein they are able to determine which risks are cheaper for the firm to manage than for shareholders. Here, market risks that result in unique risks for the firm are commonly the best candidates for financial risk management. [21]

Application

As outlined, businesses are exposed, in the main, to market, credit and operational risk. A broad distinction [12] exists though, between financial institutions and non-financial firms - and correspondingly, the application of risk management will differ. Respectively: [12] For Banks and Fund Managers, "credit and market risks are taken intentionally with the objective of earning returns, while operational risks are a byproduct to be controlled". For non-financial firms, the priorities are reversed, as "the focus is on the risks associated with the business" - ie the production and marketing of the services and products in which expertise is held - and their impact on revenue, costs and cash flow, "while market and credit risks are usually of secondary importance as they are a byproduct of the main business agenda". (See related discussion re valuing financial services firms as compared to other firms.) In all cases, as above, risk capital is the last "line of defence".

Banking

Banks and other wholesale institutions face various financial risks in conducting their business, and how well these risks are managed and understood is a key driver [22] behind profitability, as well as of the quantum of capital they are required to hold. [23] Financial risk management in banking has thus grown markedly in importance since the Financial crisis of 2007–2008. [24] (This has given rise [24] to dedicated degrees and professional certifications.)

Investment banking

The 5% Value at Risk of a hypothetical profit-and-loss probability density function VaR diagram.JPG
The 5% Value at Risk of a hypothetical profit-and-loss probability density function

For investment banks the major focus is on credit and market risk, and especially through regulatory capital, includes operational risk. Credit risk is inherent in the business of banking, but additionally, these institutions are exposed to counterparty credit risk. Both are to some extent offset by margining and collateral; and the management is of the net-position. Large banks are also exposed to Macroeconomic systematic risk - risks related to the aggregate economy the bank is operating in [25] (see Too big to fail).

The discipline [26] [27] [7] [8] is, as outlined, simultaneously concerned with (i) managing, and as necessary hedging, the various positions held by the institution - both trading positions and long term exposures; and (ii) calculating and monitoring the resultant economic capital, as well as the regulatory capital under Basel III — which, importantly, covers also leverage and liquidity — with regulatory capital as a floor.

Correspondingly, and broadly, the analytics [27] [26] are based as follows: For (i) on the "Greeks", the sensitivity of the price of a derivative to a change in its underlying factors; as well as on the various other measures of sensitivity, such as DV01 for the sensitivity of a bond or swap to interest rates, and CS01 or JTD for exposure to credit spread. For (ii) on value at risk, or "VaR", an estimate of how much the investment or area in question might lose with a given probability in a set time period, with the bank holding "economic"- or “risk capital” correspondingly; common parameters are 99% and 95% worst-case losses - i.e. 1% and 5% - and one day and two week (10 day) horizons. [28] These calculations are mathematically sophisticated, and within the domain of quantitative finance.

The regulatory capital quantum is calculated via specified formulae: risk weighting the exposures per highly standardized asset-categorizations, applying the aside frameworks, and the resultant capital — at least 12.9% [29] of these Risk-weighted assets (RWA) — must then be held in specific "tiers" and is measured correspondingly via the various capital ratios. In certain cases, banks are allowed to use their own estimated risk parameters here; these "internal ratings-based models" typically result in less required capital, but at the same time are subject to strict minimum conditions and disclosure requirements. As mentioned, additional to the capital covering RWA, the aggregate balance sheet will require capital for leverage and liquidity; this is monitored via [30] the LR, LCR, and NSFR ratios.

The financial crisis exposed holes in the mechanisms used for hedging (see Fundamental Review of the Trading Book § Background, Tail risk § Role of the 2007–2008 financial crisis, Value at risk § Criticism, and Basel III § Criticism). As such, the methodologies employed have had to evolve, both from a modelling point of view, and in parallel, from a regulatory point of view.

Regarding the modelling, changes corresponding to the above are: (i) For the daily direct analysis of the positions at the desk level, as a standard, measurement of the Greeks now inheres the volatility surface — through local- or stochastic volatility models — while re interest rates, discounting and analytics are under a "multi-curve framework". Derivative pricing now embeds considerations re counterparty risk and funding risk, amongst others, [31] through the CVA and XVA "valuation adjustments"; these also carry regulatory capital. (ii) For Value at Risk, the traditional parametric and "Historical" approaches, are now supplemented [32] [27] with the more sophisticated Conditional value at risk / expected shortfall, Tail value at risk, and Extreme value theory. For the underlying mathematics, these may utilize mixture models, PCA, volatility clustering, copulas, and other techniques. [33] Extensions to VaR include Margin-, Liquidity-, Earnings- and Cash flow at risk, as well as Liquidity-adjusted VaR. For both (i) and (ii), model risk is addressed [34] through regular validation of the models used by the bank's various divisions; for VaR models, backtesting is especially employed.

Regulatory changes, are also twofold. The first change, entails an increased emphasis [35] on bank stress tests. [36] These tests, essentially a simulation of the balance sheet for a given scenario, are typically linked to the macroeconomics, and provide an indicator of how sensitive the bank is to changes in economic conditions, whether it is sufficiently capitalized, and of its ability to respond to market events. The second set of changes, sometimes called "Basel IV", entails the modification of several regulatory capital standards (CRR III is the EU implementation). In particular FRTB addresses market risk, and SA-CCR addresses counterparty risk; other modifications are being phased in from 2023.

To operationalize the above, Investment banks, particularly, employ dedicated "Risk Groups", i.e. Middle Office teams monitoring the firm's risk-exposure to, and the profitability and structure of, its various business units, products, asset classes, desks, and / or geographies. [37] By increasing order of aggregation:

  1. Financial institutions will set [38] [26] [39] limit values for each of the Greeks, or other sensitivities, that their traders must not exceed, and traders will then hedge, offset, or reduce periodically if not daily; see the techniques listed below. These limits are set given a range [40] of plausible changes in prices and rates, coupled with the board-specified risk appetite [41] re overnight-losses. [42]
  2. Desks, or areas, will similarly be limited as to their VaR quantum (total or incremental, and under various calculation regimes), corresponding to their allocated [43] economic capital; a loss which exceeds the VaR threshold is termed a "VaR breach". RWA - with other regulatory results - is correspondingly monitored from desk level [38] and upward.
  3. Each area's (or desk's) concentration risk will be checked [44] [37] [45] against thresholds set for various types of risk, and / or re a single counterparty, sector or geography.
  4. Leverage will be monitored, at very least re regulatory requirements via LR, the Leverage Ratio, as leveraged positions could lose large amounts for a relatively small move in the price of the underlying.
  5. Relatedly, [30] liquidity risk is monitored: LCR, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, measures the ability of the bank to survive a short-term stress, covering its total net cash outflows over the next 30 days with "high quality liquid assets"; NSFR, the Net Stable Funding Ratio, assesses its ability to finance assets and commitments within a year (addressing also, maturity transformation risk). Any "gaps", also, must be managed. [46]
  6. Systemically Important Banks hold additional capital such that their total loss absorbency capacity, TLAC, is sufficient [47] given both RWA and leverage. (See also "MREL" [48] for EU institutions.)

Periodically, [49] these all are estimated under a given stress scenario — regulatory and, [50] often, internal — and risk capital, [22] together with these limits if indicated, [22] [51] is correspondingly revisited (or optimized [52] ). The approaches taken center either on a hypothetical or historical scenario, [35] [27] and may apply increasingly sophisticated mathematics [53] [27] to the analysis. More generally, these tests provide estimates for scenarios beyond the VaR thresholds, thus “preparing for anything that might happen, rather than worrying about precise likelihoods". [54] A reverse stress test, in fact, starts from the point at which "the institution can be considered as failing or likely to fail... and then explores scenarios and circumstances that might cause this to occur". [55]

A key practice, [56] incorporating and assimilating the above, is to assess the Risk-adjusted return on capital, RAROC, of each area (or product). Here, [57] "economic profit" is divided by allocated-capital; and this result is then compared [57] [23] to the target-return for the area — usually, at least the equity holders' expected returns on the bank stock [57] — and identified under-performance can then be addressed. (See similar below re. DuPont analysis.) The numerator, risk-adjusted return, is realized trading-return less a term and risk appropriate funding cost as charged by Treasury to the business-unit under the bank's funds transfer pricing (FTP) framework; [58] direct costs are (sometimes) also subtracted. [56] The denominator is the area's allocated capital, as above, increasing as a function of position risk; [59] [60] [56] several allocation techniques exist. [43] RAROC is calculated both ex post as discussed, used for performance evaluation (and related bonus calculations), and ex ante - i.e. expected return less expected loss - to decide whether a particular business unit should be expanded or contracted. [61]

Other teams, overlapping the above Groups, are then also involved in risk management. Corporate Treasury is responsible for monitoring overall funding and capital structure; it shares responsibility for monitoring liquidity risk, and for maintaining the FTP framework. Middle Office maintains the following functions also: Product Control is primarily responsible for insuring traders mark their books to fair value — a key protection against rogue traders — and for "explaining" the daily P&L; with the "unexplained" component, of particular interest to risk managers. Credit Risk monitors the bank's debt-clients on an ongoing basis, re both exposure and performance. In the Front Office - since counterparty and funding-risks span assets, products, and desks - specialized XVA-desks are tasked with centrally monitoring and managing overall CVA and XVA exposure and capital, typically with oversight from the appropriate Group. [31] "Stress Testing" may similarly be centralized.

Performing the above tasks — while simultaneously ensuring that computations are consistent [62] over the various areas, products, teams, and measures — requires that banks maintain a significant investment [63] in sophisticated infrastructure, finance / risk software, and dedicated staff. Risk software often deployed is from FIS, Kamakura, Murex, Numerix (FINCAD) and Refinitiv. Large institutions may prefer systems developed entirely "in house" - notably [64] Goldman Sachs ("SecDB"), JP Morgan ("Athena"), Jane Street, Barclays ("BARX"), BofA ("Quartz") - while, more commonly, the pricing library will be developed internally, especially as this allows for currency re new products or market features.

Commercial and retail banking

Risk taxonomy for retail and commercial banks Risk in Banking.jpg
Risk taxonomy for retail and commercial banks

Commercial and retail banks [65] [66] [67] [68] are, by nature, more conservative than Investment banks. Their focus is on steady income from lending and deposits – i.e. as opposed to profits from (proprietary) trading, structuring and deal making. The biggest concern here is credit risk—risk of loan defaults from individuals or businesses. Liquidity risk, in this context not having enough liquid assets to meet withdrawal demands, is also a major focus; while interest rate risk concerns the impact of interest rate changes on net interest margins (the spread between deposit and loan rates).

For these banks, regulatory oversight is often tighter due to their direct impact on the financial system. Thus they are also highly regulated under Basel III and national banking laws, and will also be subject to regular stress testing by central banks; thus all regulations above apply (with local exceptions; e.g. an LCR "threshold" in the US [69] ). Additional to these, however, they must maintain high capital and liquidity ratios to protect depositors; see CAMELS rating system.

Given their business model and risk appetite, [67] as outlined, various differences result re risk management at investment banks.

  • Banks here maintain specific (and often additional) capital buffers to cover potential loan losses:- reflecting the fact that retail and commercial loans usually attract higher RWA results [70] than for assets typical in investment banking. See, e.g., the ALLL and NPL ratios.
  • At the same time, credit exposure for these banks is to significantly more clients than at investment banks. For retail banks, "consumer credit risk" is often diversified across a vast number of borrowers, and these employ statistical models for credit scoring and probability of default. Commercial banks deal with mid-sized corporate loans and bonds, and apply accounting- and financial analysis to determine creditworthiness; the approach differs re investment banking in that the broad client base allows for (necessitates) automation, with close monitoring on an exception basis.
  • Concentration risk, relatedly, differs in its management: the concern is sector concentration as opposed to "name concentration". Here, in calculating VaR for a credit portfolio, [71] banks will incorporate a joint default probability for the various sectors and / or industries.
  • Both retail and commercial banks employ strict liquidity management to ensure enough cash for customer withdrawals - at a minimum meeting their regulator's reserve requirement. See also liquidity at risk.
  • Both use interest rate hedging (e.g., swaps) but here, in the main, to protect their profit margin against rate fluctuations, and the resultant "margin compression"; i.e., as opposed to addressing market risk per se. Re the latter, they will often employ the abovementioned cash flow at risk and earnings at risk models.

The Risk Management function typically exists independent of operations - although may sit in Treasury - and reports directly to the board. [68] Its scope often extends to non-financial operational and (possibly) reputational risk. Specialised software is employed here, both operationally and for risk management and modelling.

Corporate finance

Contribution analytics: Profit and Loss for units sold at current fixed costs. CVP-FC-Contrib-PL.svg
Contribution analytics: Profit and Loss for units sold at current fixed costs.
The same, for varying (scenario-based) Revenue levels, at current Fixed and Total costs. Breakeven small.png
The same, for varying (scenario-based) Revenue levels, at current Fixed and Total costs.

In corporate finance, and financial management more generally, [72] [10] financial risk management, as above, is concerned with business risk - risks to the business’ value, within the context of its business strategy and capital structure. [73] The scope here - ie in non-financial firms [12] - is thus broadened [9] [74] [75] (re banking) to overlap enterprise risk management, and financial risk management then addresses risks to the firm's overall strategic objectives, incorporating various (all) financial aspects [76] of the exposures and opportunities arising from business decisions, and their link to the firm’s appetite for risk, as well as their impact on share price. In many organizations, risk executives are therefore involved in strategy formulation: "the choice of which risks to undertake through the allocation of its scarce resources is the key tool available to management." [77]

Re the standard framework, [76] then, the discipline largely focuses on operations, i.e. business risk, as outlined. Here, the management is ongoing [10] — see following description — and is coupled with the use of insurance, [78] managing the net-exposure as above: credit risk is usually addressed via provisioning and credit insurance; likewise, where this treatment is deemed appropriate, specifically identified operational risks are also insured. [75] Market risk, in this context, [12] is concerned mainly with changes in commodity prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates, and any adverse impact due to these on cash flow and profitability, and hence share price.

Correspondingly, the practice here covers two perspectives; these are shared with corporate finance more generally:

  1. Both risk management and corporate finance share the goal of enhancing, or at least preserving, firm value. [72] Here, [9] [76] businesses devote much time and effort to (short term) liquidity-, cash flow- and performance monitoring, and Risk Management then also overlaps cash- and treasury management, especially as impacted by capital and funding as above. More specifically re business-operations, management emphasizes their break even dynamics, contribution margin and operating leverage, and the corresponding monitoring and management of revenue, of costs, and of other budget elements. The DuPont analysis entails a "decomposition" of the firm's return on equity, ROE, allowing management to identify and address specific areas of concern, [79] preempting any underperformance vs shareholders' required return. [80] In larger firms, specialist Risk Analysts complement this work with model-based analytics more broadly; [81] [82] in some cases, employing sophisticated stochastic models, [82] [83] in, for example, financing activity prediction problems, and for risk analysis ahead of a major investment.
  2. Firm exposure to long term market (and business) risk is a direct result of previous capital investment decisions. Where applicable here [12] [76] [72] — usually in large corporates and under guidance from [84] their investment bankers — risk analysts will manage and hedge [78] their exposures using traded financial instruments to create commodity-, [85] [86] interest rate- [87] [88] and foreign exchange hedges [89] [90] (see further below). Because company specific, "over-the-counter" (OTC) contracts tend to be costly to create and monitor — i.e. using financial engineering and / or structured products — ”standard” derivatives that trade on well-established exchanges are often preferred. [14] [76] These comprise options, futures, forwards, and swaps; the "second generation" exotic derivatives usually trade OTC. Complementary to this hedging, periodically, Treasury may also adjust the capital structure, reducing financial leverage - i.e. repaying debt-funding - so as to accommodate increased business risk; they may also suspend dividends. [91]

Multinational corporations are faced with additional challenges, particularly as relates to foreign exchange risk, and the scope of financial risk management modifies significantly in the international realm. [89] Here, dependent on time horizon and risk sub-type — transactions exposure [92] (essentially that discussed above), accounting exposure, [93] and economic exposure [94] — so the corporate will manage its risk differently. The forex risk-management discussed here and above, is additional to the per transaction "forward cover" that importers and exporters purchase from their bank (alongside other trade finance mechanisms).

Hedging-related transactions will attract their own accounting treatment, and corporates (and banks) may then require changes to systems, processes and documentation; [95] [96] see Hedge accounting, Mark-to-market accounting, Hedge relationship, Cash flow hedge, IFRS 7, IFRS 9, IFRS 13, FASB 133, IAS 39, FAS 130.

It is common for large corporations to have dedicated risk management teams — typically within FP&A or corporate treasury — reporting to the CRO; often these overlap the internal audit function (see Three lines of defence). For small firms, it is impractical to have a formal risk management function, but these typically apply the above practices, at least the first set, informally, as part of the financial management function; see discussion under Financial analyst.

The discipline relies on a range of software, [97] correspondingly, from spreadsheets (invariably as a starting point, and frequently in total [98] ) through commercial EPM and BI tools, often BusinessObjects (SAP), OBI EE (Oracle), Cognos (IBM), and Power BI (Microsoft). [99]

Investment management

Modern portfolio theory suggests a diversified portfolio of shares and other asset classes (such as debt in corporate bonds, treasury bonds, or money market funds) will realise more predictable returns if there is prudent market regulation. Asset Allocation.pdf
Modern portfolio theory suggests a diversified portfolio of shares and other asset classes (such as debt in corporate bonds, treasury bonds, or money market funds) will realise more predictable returns if there is prudent market regulation.
Efficient Frontier. The hyperbola is sometimes referred to as the "Markowitz bullet", and its upward sloped portion is the efficient frontier if no risk-free asset is available. With a risk-free asset, the straight capital allocation line is the efficient frontier. Markowitz frontier.jpg
Efficient Frontier. The hyperbola is sometimes referred to as the "Markowitz bullet", and its upward sloped portion is the efficient frontier if no risk-free asset is available. With a risk-free asset, the straight capital allocation line is the efficient frontier.
Here maximizing return and minimizing risk such that the portfolio is Pareto efficient (Pareto-optimal points in red). Pareto Efficient Frontier for the Markowitz Portfolio selection problem..png
Here maximizing return and minimizing risk such that the portfolio is Pareto efficient (Pareto-optimal points in red).

Fund managers, classically, [100] define the risk of a portfolio as its variance [11] (or standard deviation), and through diversification the portfolio is optimized so as to achieve the lowest risk for a given targeted return, or equivalently the highest return for a given level of risk; these risk-efficient portfolios form the "Efficient frontier" (see Markowitz model). The logic here is that returns from different assets are highly unlikely to be perfectly correlated, and in fact the correlation may sometimes be negative. In this way, market risk particularly, and other financial risks such as inflation risk (see below) can at least partially be moderated by forms of diversification.

A key issue, however, is that the (assumed) relationships are (implicitly) forward looking. As observed in the late-2000s recession, historic relationships can break down, resulting in losses to market participants believing that diversification would provide sufficient protection (in that market, including funds that had been explicitly set up to avoid being affected in this way [101] ). A related issue is that diversification has costs: as correlations are not constant it may be necessary to regularly rebalance the portfolio, incurring transaction costs, negatively impacting investment performance; [102] and as the fund manager diversifies, so this problem compounds (and a large fund may also exert market impact). See Modern portfolio theory § Criticisms.

Addressing these issues, more sophisticated approaches have been developed, both to defining risk, and to the optimization itself. (Respective examples: (tail) risk parity, focuses on allocation of risk, rather than allocation of capital; the Black–Litterman model modifies the "Markowitz optimization", to incorporate the views of the portfolio manager. [103] ) Relatedly, modern financial risk modeling employs a variety of techniques — including value at risk, [104] historical simulation, stress tests, and extreme value theory — to analyze the portfolio and to forecast the likely losses incurred for a variety of risks and scenarios.

Here, guided by the analytics, Fund Managers (and traders) will apply specific risk hedging techniques. [100] [11] As appropriate, these may relate to the portfolio as a whole or to individual holdings:

Further, and more generally, various safety-criteria may guide overall portfolio construction. The Kelly criterion [117] will suggest - i.e. limit - the size of a position that an investor should hold in her portfolio. Roy's safety-first criterion [118] minimizes the probability of the portfolio's return falling below a minimum desired threshold. Chance-constrained portfolio selection similarly seeks to ensure that the probability of final wealth falling below a given "safety level" is acceptable.

Managers may also employ factor models [119] (generically APT) to measure exposure to macroeconomic and market risk factors [120] using time series regression. Ahead of an anticipated movement in any of these factors, the Manager may then, as indicated, reduce holdings, hedge, or purchase offsetting exposure. Inflation for example, although impacting all securities, [121] can be managed [122] [123] at the portfolio level by appropriately [124] increasing exposure to inflation-sensitive stocks (e.g. consumer staples), and / or by investing in tangible assets, commodities and inflation-linked bonds; the latter may also provide a direct hedge. [125]

In parallel with all above, [126] [127] managers — active and passive — periodically monitor and manage tracking error, i.e. underperformance vs a "benchmark". Here, they will use attribution analysis preemptively so as to diagnose the source early, and to take corrective action: realigning, often factor-wise, on the basis of this "feedback". [127] [128] As relevant, they will similarly use style analysis to address style drift. See also Fixed-income attribution.

Given the complexity of these analyses and techniques, Fund Managers typically rely on sophisticated software (as do banks, above). Widely used platforms are provided by BlackRock (Aladdin), Refinitiv (Eikon), Finastra, Murex, Numerix, MPI and Morningstar.

See also

Articles
Discussion
Lists

Bibliography

Financial institutions

Corporations

Portfolios

References

  1. ↑ Peter F. Christoffersen (22 November 2011). Elements of Financial Risk Management. Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-12-374448-7.
  2. ↑ Financial Risk Management, Finance Glossary. Gartnergartner.com
  3. ↑ W. Kenton (2021). "Harry Markowitz", investopedia.com
  4. ↑ Markowitz, H.M. (March 1952). "Portfolio Selection". The Journal of Finance. 7 (1): 77–91. doi:10.2307/2975974. JSTOR   2975974.
  5. 1 2 3 See § "Does Corporate Risk Management Create Value?" in Capital Budgeting Applications and Pitfalls. Ch 13 of Ivo Welch (2022). Corporate Finance, 5 Ed. IAW Publishers. ISBN   978-0984004904
  6. ↑ Allan M. Malz (13 September 2011). Financial Risk Management: Models, History, and Institutions. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-118-02291-7.
  7. 1 2 Van Deventer, Nicole L, Donald R., and Kenji Imai. Credit risk models and the Basel Accords. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia), 2003.
  8. 1 2 Drumond, Ines. "Bank capital requirements, business cycle fluctuations and the Basel Accords: a synthesis." Journal of Economic Surveys 23.5 (2009): 798-830.
  9. 1 2 3 John Hampton (2011). The AMA Handbook of Financial Risk Management. American Management Association. ISBN   978-0814417447
  10. 1 2 3 Jayne Thompson (2019). What Is Financial Risk Management?, chron.com
  11. 1 2 3 Will Kenton (2023). What Is Risk Management in Finance, and Why Is It Important?, investopedia.com
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 See "Market Risk Management in Non-financial Firms", in Carol Alexander, Elizabeth Sheedy eds. (2015). The Professional Risk Managers’ Handbook 2015 Edition. PRMIA. ISBN   978-0976609704
  13. ↑ See for example, "Corporate Finance: First Principles", in Aswath Damodaran (2014). Applied Corporate Finance. Wiley. ISBN   978-1118808931
  14. 1 2 Jonathan Lewellen (2003). Financial Management - Risk Management. MIT OCW
  15. ↑ Why Corporations Hedge; Ch 3.7 in Baranoff et. al.
  16. ↑ KRISHNAMURTI CHANDRASEKHAR; Krishnamurti & Viswanath (eds.) "; Vishwanath S. R. (2010-01-30). Advanced Corporate Finance. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. pp. 178–. ISBN   978-81-203-3611-7.
  17. ↑ John J. Hampton (1982). Modern Financial Theory: Perfect and Imperfect Markets. Reston Publishing Company. ISBN   978-0-8359-4553-0.
  18. ↑ Zahirul Hoque (2005). Handbook of Cost and Management Accounting. Spiramus Press Ltd. pp. 201–. ISBN   978-1-904905-01-1.
  19. ↑ Kirt C. Butler (28 August 2012). Multinational Finance: Evaluating Opportunities, Costs, and Risks of Operations. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 37–. ISBN   978-1-118-28276-2.
  20. ↑ Dietmar Franzen (6 December 2012). Design of Master Agreements for OTC Derivatives. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 7–. ISBN   978-3-642-56932-6.
  21. ↑ Corporate Finance: Part I. Bookboon. pp. 32–. ISBN   978-87-7681-568-4.
  22. 1 2 3 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (2019). Comptroller’s Handbook: "Corporate and Risk Governance"
  23. 1 2 Fadi Zaher (2022). Using Economic Capital to Determine Risk, investopedia.
  24. 1 2 The Rise of the Chief Risk Officer, Institutional Investor (March 2017).
  25. ↑ Bolt, Wilko; Haan, Leo de; Hoeberichts, Marco; Oordt, Maarten van; Swank, Job (September 2012). "Bank Profitability during Recessions" (PDF). Journal of Banking & Finance . 36 (9): 2552–64. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.05.011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-10-03. Retrieved 2022-03-22.
  26. 1 2 3 Martin Haugh (2016). "Basic Concepts and Techniques of Risk Management". Columbia University
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 Roy E. DeMeo (N.D.) "Quantitative Risk Management: VaR and Others". UNC Charlotte
  28. ↑ Pearson, Neil (2002). Risk Budgeting: Portfolio Problem Solving with Value-at-Risk. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-471-40556-6.
  29. ↑ Steven Nickolas (2023). "Tier 1 Capital vs. Tier 2 Capital", Investopedia
  30. 1 2 PwC (2016). An overview of the LCR, NSFR and LR
  31. 1 2 International Association of Credit Portfolio Managers (2018). "The Evolution of XVA Desk Management"
  32. ↑ Saunders, Anthony; Allen, Linda (2010). Credit Risk Management In and Out of the Financial Crisis: New Approaches to Value at Risk and Other Paradigms. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-470-62236-0.
  33. ↑ See for example III.A.3, in Carol Alexander, ed. (January 2005). The Professional Risk Managers' Handbook. PRMIA Publications. ISBN   978-0976609704
  34. ↑ Riccardo Rebonato (N.D.). Theory and Practice of Model Risk Management.
  35. 1 2 Troy Segal (2021). "What Is a Bank Stress Test? How It Works, Benefits, and Criticism", Investopedia
  36. ↑ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2009). "Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision"
  37. 1 2 International Association of Credit Portfolio Managers (2022). "Risk mitigation techniques in credit portfolio management"
  38. 1 2 Bank for International Settlements (2019). MAR12 - Definition of trading desk
  39. ↑ Open Risk Manual (2021). "Risk Limit"
  40. ↑ Bank for International Settlements (2001). Principles for the Management and Supervision of Interest Rate Risk
  41. ↑ Open Risk Manual (2021). "Limit framework"
  42. ↑ Staff (2023). "Mitigating Overnight Position Volatility". fastercapital.com
  43. 1 2 Guo, Qiheng, Daniel Bauer, and George H. Zanjani. 2021. “Capital Allocation Techniques: Review and Comparison.” Variance 14 (2).
  44. ↑ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1999). "Risk Concentrations Principles"
  45. ↑ "Principles for the Management of Concentration Risk" (PDF). Malta Financial Services Authority. 2010.
  46. ↑ Bank for International Settlements (2016). Interest rate risk in the banking book
  47. ↑ Bank for International Settlements (2017). TLAC – Executive Summary
  48. ↑ "Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities"; see MREL, treasurers.org
  49. ↑ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2009). "Range of practices and issues in economic capital frameworks"
  50. ↑ KPMG (2016)."Stress testing - A benchmark analysis of systemically important financial institutions"
  51. ↑ Financial Stability Board (2013). "Principles for An Effective Risk Appetite Framework"
  52. ↑ KPMG (2017). "Balance sheet optimisation:the returns dilemma for banks"
  53. ↑ Li Ong (2014). "A Guide to IMF Stress Testing Methods and Models", International Monetary Fund
  54. ↑ David Aldous (2016). Review of Financial Risk Management... for Dummies
  55. ↑ Reverse stress test, Association of Corporate Treasurers
  56. 1 2 3 Michel Crouhy (2006). "Risk Management, Capital Attribution and Performance Measurement"
  57. 1 2 3 J Skoglund (2010). "Funds Transfer Pricing and Risk Adjusted Performance Measurement". SAS Institute.
  58. ↑ Wolters Kluwer (2021). "Enhancing fund transfer pricing systems"
  59. ↑ Karen Moss (2018). "Funds-transfer-pricing in Banks: what are the main drivers?". Moodys Analytics
  60. ↑ James Chen (2021). Risk-Adjusted Return on Capital (RAROC) Explained & Formula, Investopedia
  61. ↑ See "Economic Capital and RAROC", Chapter 28 in Hull, John (2023).
  62. ↑ Michael Gibson (1997). "Information systems for risk management". Federal Reserve Board
  63. ↑ See e.g. "Build vs Buy" in Holton, G. (2013). Value-at-Risk: Theory and Practice, Second Edition
  64. ↑ Sarah Butcher (2017). "The $bn struggle to replicate Goldman Sachs' special powers", efinancialcareers.com
  65. ↑ Dr Andros Gregoriou (N.D.) Commercial Bank Risk Management
  66. ↑ Amalendu Ghosh (2012). "Managing Risks in Commercial and Retail Banking". Wiley. ISBN   9781118103531
  67. 1 2 Faster Capital (2024). Retail vs: Commercial Banking Risk Profiles
  68. 1 2 Hong Kong Institute of Bankers (2023). Risk Management
  69. ↑ "Changes to Applicability Thresholds for Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Requirements" (PDF). occ.treas.gov. Retrieved 2025-03-13.
  70. ↑ Alicia Tuovila (2023). Understanding Risk-Weighted Assets, Investopedia
  71. ↑ World Finance (N.D.). Credit value at risk
  72. 1 2 3 Risk Management and the Financial Manager. Ch. 20 in Julie Dahlquist, Rainford Knight, Alan S. Adams (2022). Principles of Finance. OpenStax, Rice University. ISBN   9781951693541.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  73. ↑ Will Kenton (2022). "Business Risk", Investopedia
  74. ↑ Stanley Myint (2022). Introduction to Corporate Financial Risk Management. PRMIA Thought Leadership Webinar
  75. 1 2 "Risk Management and the Firm’s Financial Statement — Opportunities within the ERM" in Esther Baranoff, Patrick Brockett, Yehuda Kahane (2012). Risk Management for Enterprises and Individuals. Saylor Academy
  76. 1 2 3 4 5 Margaret Woods and Kevin Dowd (2008). Financial Risk Management for Management Accountants, Chartered Institute of Management Accountants
  77. ↑ Don Chance and Michael Edleson (2021). Introduction to Risk Management. Ch 10 in "Derivatives". CFA Institute Investment Series. ISBN   978-1119850571
  78. 1 2 Managing financial risks; summary of Ch. 51 in: Pascal Quiry; Yann Le Fur; Antonio Salvi; Maurizio Dallochio; Pierre Vernimmen (2011). Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN   978-1119975588
  79. ↑ Marshall Hargrave (2022). Dupont Analysis, Investopedia.
  80. ↑ See discussion under § Shareholder Value, ROE, and Cash Flow Analyses in: Jamie Pratt and Michael Peters (2016). Financial Accounting in an Economic Context (10th Edition). Wiley Finance. ISBN   978-1-119-30616-0
  81. ↑ See §39 "Corporate Planning Models", and §294 "Simulation Model" in Joel G. Siegel; Jae K. Shim; Stephen Hartman (1 November 1997). Schaum's quick guide to business formulas: 201 decision-making tools for business, finance, and accounting students. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN   978-0-07-058031-2 . Retrieved 12 November 2011.
  82. 1 2 David Shimko (2009). Quantifying Corporate Financial Risk. archived 2010-07-17.
  83. ↑ See for example this problem (from John Hull's Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives), discussing cash position modeled stochastically.
  84. ↑ David Shimko (2009). Dangers of Corporate Derivative Transactions
  85. ↑ Deloitte / MCX (2018). Commodity price risk management
  86. ↑ CPA Australia (2012). A guide to managing commodity risk
  87. ↑ Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (N.D.). Interest rate risk management
  88. ↑ CPA Australia (2008). Understanding and Managing Interest Rate Risk
  89. 1 2 Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (N.D.). Foreign currency risk and its management
  90. ↑ CPA Australia (2009). A guide to managing foreign exchange risk
  91. ↑ Claire Boyte-White (2023). 4 Reasons a Company Might Suspend Its Dividend, Investopedia
  92. ↑ "Contrary to conventional wisdom it may be rational to hedge translation exposure.": Raj Aggarwal (1991). "Management of Accounting Exposure to Currency Changes: Role and Evidence of Agency Costs". Managerial Finance, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 10-22.
  93. ↑ Aggarwal, Raj, "The Translation Problem in International Accounting: Insights for Financial Management." Management International Review 15 (Nos. 2-3, 1975): 67-79. (Proposed accounting framework for evaluating and developing translation procedures for multinational corporations).
  94. ↑ Aggarwal, Raj; DeMaskey, Andrea L. (April 30, 1997). "Cross-Hedging Currency Risks in Asian Emerging Markets Using Derivatives in Major Currencies". The Journal of Portfolio Management. 23 (3): 88–95. doi:10.3905/jpm.1997.409611. S2CID   153476555.
  95. ↑ Price Waterhouse Coopers (2017). Achieving hedge accounting in practice under IFRS 9
  96. ↑ Conti, Cesare & Mauri, Arnaldo (2008). "Corporate Financial Risk Management: Governance and Disclosure post IFRS 7", Icfai Journal of Financial Risk Management, ISSN   0972-916X, Vol. V, n. 2, pp. 20–27.
  97. ↑ See: "Financial Management System (FMS) - Gartner Finance Glossary". Gartner. Retrieved 2022-01-06.
  98. ↑ Jeremy Fabbri (2020). Should You Use Spreadsheets for Risk Management?
  99. ↑ N. Shmeleva (2024). "Using Predictive Analytics in Risk Management"
  100. 1 2 Pamela Drake and Frank Fabozzi (2009). What Is Finance?
  101. ↑ Khandani, Amir E.; Lo, Andrew W. (2007). "What Happened To The Quants In August 2007?" (PDF). Journal of Financial Markets. 14 (1): 1–46. doi:10.1016/j.finmar.2010.07.005. hdl:1721.1/108275.
  102. ↑ William F. Sharpe (1991). "The Arithmetic of Active Management" Archived 2013-11-13 at the Wayback Machine . Financial Analysts Journal Vol. 47, No. 1, January/February
  103. ↑ Guangliang He and Robert Litterman (1999). "The Intuition Behind Black-Litterman Model Portfolios". Goldman Sachs Quantitative Resources Group
  104. ↑ Ballotta, L., & Fusai, G. (2018). "A gentle introduction to value at risk". SSRN   2942138 .
  105. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 For discussion and examples re calculating the appropriate "optimal hedge ratio" - based on beta, delta, or duration - and then executing, see: Roger G . Clarke (1992). "Options and Futures: A Tutorial". CFA Institute Research Foundation
  106. ↑ Staff (2020). What is index option trading and how does it work?, Investopedia
  107. ↑ Daniel Laboe (2021). How To Properly Hedge Your Portfolio Using Put Options, nasdaq.com
  108. ↑ Staff (2020). How to hedge your bond portfolio against falling rates, bloomberg.com
  109. ↑ Jeffrey L. Stouffer (2011). Protecting A Bond Portfolio With Futures Contracts, Financial Advisor Magazine
  110. ↑ C. Kopp (2022). "Bond Laddering: How it Works, Benefits, Variations", investopedia.com
  111. ↑ "Multi-curve and collateral framework", CQF Institute.
  112. ↑ See e.g. OpenGamma Quantitative Research (2013). The Pricing and Risk Management of Credit Default Swaps
  113. ↑ Jorge A. Chan-Lau (2006). Market-Based Estimation of Default Probabilities and Its Application to Financial Market Surveillance International Monetary Fund
  114. ↑ Paul Glasserman (2000). Probability Models of Credit Risk
  115. ↑ Mukul Pareek (2021). "Credit Migration Framework"
  116. ↑ Staff (2021). How Credit Rating Risk Affects Corporate Bonds, Investopedia
  117. ↑ Justin Kuepper (2023). Using the Kelly Criterion for Asset Allocation and Money Management, Investopedia
  118. ↑ Will Kenton (2020). Roy's Safety-First Criterion (SFRatio) Definition and Calculation, Investopedia
  119. ↑ "A Practitioner's Guide to Factor Models". CFA Institute Research Foundation
  120. ↑ William F. Sharpe (1999). "Factor-based Expected Returns, Risks and Correlations"
  121. ↑ Troy Segal (2022). "What is inflation and how does inflation affect investments?". Investopedia
  122. ↑ James Chen (2022). "Inflation Hedge", Investopedia
  123. ↑ Staff (2022-01-31). "Managing Portfolio Risk in A High-Inflation Market". KLO Financial Services. Retrieved 2023-05-12.
  124. ↑ See. e.g., Morgan Stanley (2022). "Managing Inflation Risk through Improved Portfolio Optimization"
  125. ↑ Dmitry Pugachevsky (2023). Managing inflation risk with hedging strategies, risk.net
  126. ↑ Carl Bacon (2019). “Performance Attribution History and Progress”, CFA Institute Research Foundation
  127. 1 2 Michael McMillan (2012). "Performance Measurement: The What, Why, and How of the Investment Management Process", CFA Institute
  128. ↑ True Tamplin (2023). "Benchmarking and Performance Attribution", Finance Strategists
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.