Interpersonal neurobiology

Last updated

Interpersonal neurobiology (IPNB) or relational neurobiology is an interdisciplinary framework that was developed in the 1990s by Daniel J. Siegel, who sought to bring together scientific disciplines to demonstrate how the mind, brain, and relationships integrate. IPNB views the mind as a process that regulates the flow of energy and information through its neurocircuitry, which is then shared and regulated between people through engagement, connection, and communication. [1] Drawing on systems theory, Siegel proposed that these processes within interpersonal relationships can shape nervous system maturation. [2] Siegel claimed that the mind has an irreducible quality which informs this approach. [2]

Contents

IPNB proposes that interpersonal experiences have substantial impact on brain development early in life. [3] [4] Siegel notes that disruptions to the continuity, presence, and availability of the caregiver result in attachment disorders that manifest as physical changes [5] [6] in neural structures that shape the perception of reality. [7] The claim is that this influences emotional intelligence, complexity of behaviours, and flexibility of responses later in life. [5] IPNB asserts a causal interaction between genetic composition and social experiences influencing neurobiological and psychological functioning. [8] [9]

History

At the University of California [ when? ] Siegel gathered academics from fields including anthropology, physics, neuroscience, sociology, linguistics, genetics, and psychiatry. [10] At this meeting, he argued that contemporary understanding of the 'mind' and the effect of social relationships on brain development/functioning was underdeveloped.

The term mind lacks a rigorous definition. The oldest and still common reference is to Hippocrates text On the Sacred Disease which refers to the mind as 'brain activity'. This definition has been rejected by sociologists, linguists, and anthropologists who argued that interpersonal relationships should be part of the definition. [11] This position is controversial, and neuroscientists and physicians have ridiculed this view, instead asserting that our thoughts and feelings, and therefore our mind, are an outcome of brain activity. [11] This is the standard view in line with William James' 1890 text Principles of Psychology. [11] Siegel counters that because developmental studies of child attachment relationships demonstrated that severed child relationships with parents could impede growth, sometimes even causing death, as first described in Sigmund Freud's 1927 text The Question of Lay Analysis , [12] a more expansive view was warranted. [11] [2]

Over the next four and half years Siegel and similar-minded colleagues began to construct the framework of interpersonal neurobiology.

Other academics who have contributed to the concept of IPNB are Alan Schore, Louis Cozolino, and Bonnie Badenoch.

Aspects

IPNB offers the Brain-Mind-Relationship or Triangle of Well-being concept to explain how social interactions shape neural connections. The biological and social interactions create continuous feedback loops, effected via neuroplasticity. [13]

Brain/body

The brain and body are intimately connected. The body holds multiple clusters of neurons. E.g., the human gut has approximately 100,000,000 neurons. Stephen Porges' polyvagal theory claims that the vagus nerve system is central to connecting these clusters. [14]

Siegel's model of the brain attempts to simplify the complexity of brain formation in emphasizing interaction between the brainstem, limbic systems (hippocampus and amygdala) and middle prefrontal cortex.

Close proximity between the Limbic System (Hippocampus & Amygdala) and Brainstem Brain limbicsystem.svg
Close proximity between the Limbic System (Hippocampus & Amygdala) and Brainstem

Due to the close proximity of the middle-prefrontal cortex, the brainstem, and limbic systems, Siegel argued that the integration of these areas via the prefrontal cortex that controlled nine essential neurobiological and interpersonal functions, [10] including:

Mind

In IPNB, the mind is the embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy and information both within and between brains. [7] IPNB decomposes the term mind into four facets:

Relationships

In epigenetics, psychological development can occur through interchange between heredity and environment, with the surrounding culture and environment influencing personality development. [15] [16] IPNB elevates epigenesis, claiming that neurons from variant experiences/relationships can alter regulatory molecules that control gene expression, thus shaping the activity and structure of neural circuits. [17] Relationships associated with negative affect experiences cause related neurons to develop thicker axons and more dendrites, which allow affect behaviour faster and more intensely than information coming from the prefrontal cortex. [18] Neural clusters associated with positive affect are evidently not as influential in the brain, to the extent that they are less salient for survival. [19] Negative experiences form stronger neural connections between the amygdala, and brainstem, which are reinforced through mental repetition and attentional bias. [20] Such experiences shape neural connections, from which the mind emerges. [21]

Integration

Siegel refers to integration as the process of linking parts into a functional whole. In IPNB, integration comes from the energy and information flow between relationships and the brain. Interpersonal relationships early in life shape neural structures that allow a coherent world view. [7] Relationships thereby facilitate or inhibit the integration of a holistic, coherent experience. Using a MEG, connectome harmonics reveals how the brain recruits differentiated regions into a harmonious whole. [7] [22] [23] Impaired integration, potentially though poor infant-caregiver relationships, may stimulate 'chaotic' or 'rigid' patterns of behaviour, possibly explaining why development is 'stunted' in such individuals.

Domains

Siegel identified nine domains of integration imperative for brain health:

  • Consciousness – differentiating the knowing from the knowns of what we are aware of[ clarification needed ]
  • Bilateral – left and right hemispheres
  • Vertical – linking the brainstem and limbic area to higher cortical regions
  • Memory – linking the elements of implicit memory to explicit memory.
  • Narrative – making sense of memory and experience to establish meaning in events
  • State – respecting the states of mind that make up memory, thought, behaviour, and action
  • Interpersonal – respecting others' inner experiences and engaging in respectful communication
  • Temporal – representing time/change and reflect on the passage of time (e.g. life versus death).
  • Identity – the sense of agency and coherence (potentially associated with feelings of belonging)

Impact on attachment and development

IPNB examines how integrative experiences promote or prune the growth of integrative brain fibres. [7] At birth, an infant's brain occupies approximately 25% the volume of an adults brain in its first year and 75% in its second year. [24] [25] This development is affected by the environment, as the subcortical areas in the brain undergo rapid growth in the first 6 months. [8] Mirror neurons promote this development, as they fire both when one sees an intentional act in someone else and then when they perform that same action, "mirroring" the behaviour of the other. Mirror neurons also stimulate internally what you see someone else feeling. [10] In which mirror neurons are trained through Hebbian learning, the simultaneous activation of cells leads to pronounced increases in synaptic strength between those cells, meaning "cells that fire together, wire together." [26] In IPNB, infants and children learn emotions like happiness and sadness from their relationships with and mirroring of their primary caregivers. The attuned communication of the caregiver being empathetic and presenting their emotional availability to the infant shapes their emotional development, both verbally and nonverbally. [27] The caregivers reactions to emotions also become the way the child understands which emotions are acceptable, with the child's future relationships possibly being contingent upon the infant caregiver relationship. [28] However, regions including the prefrontal cortex develop into the third decade of life, with basic emotional regulation not being an overly reliant factor on the caregiver. [8]

Growing up in dysfunctional family environments or experiencing social isolation can atrophy the 'emotional' areas of the brain. [8] [29] For example, toxic parent-child attachments involving verbal/physical abuse, and regular angry interactions impairs the child's sense of agency, coherence, and affectivity in interactions with others. [5] Parents with unresolved personal issues may project these emotions onto their children. Internally, elevated cortisol in the limbic region coincides with suboptimal attachment experiences that can kill neurons and alter genes in the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis (HPA), which controls stress hormone release. The regulatory molecules that control gene expression can be changed by stress, leading to the accelerated pruning and restructuring of neural networks, increasing latent vulnerability to attachment and mental disorders. [10] Altogether, depending on the healthiness of the child-caregiver relationship, distinct attachment styles identified in clinical observation will be promoted within the child, including secure attachment, anxious-ambivalent attachment, and anxious-avoidant/dismissive-avoidant attachment. Children lacking a secure attachment with their caregiver are more prone to mental illness. Siegel asserts that too few inhibitory fibres connect the middle prefrontal cortex to the amygdala in people with bipolar disorder. An 8-year-old with 900 fibers going connecting to their amygdala to calm it down, needs 600 to make it work well. [10] But during adolescence, high stress levels (as well as probably being genetically induced) can prune half the inhibitory fibres, leading to symptoms (such as mood swings).

Parents damaged by an infant-caregiver attachment issue can unknowingly pass this attachment style to their children. Effective therapy may be able to create new connections and neural nets associated with better regulation of emotions and attuned communication, fostering better interpersonal relationships.

Applications to practice

Although little empirical research asseses the in-depth application of interpersonal neurobiology, various IPNB-informed studies have been conducted.

Counselling

Miller et al. 2016

This small study (n=6) used an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) framework in collecting beliefs about the potential improvements of counsellors clinical practice after learning IPNB in a one-year course. In sum, the counsellors accepted that IPNB facilitated personal and professional development. They reported an increase in compassion, empathy, and acceptance towards self and others. They also reported increased self-awareness, presence in relationships with others, and confidence in their own intuition as clinicians, all of which are proven qualities for effective counselling. [30] The majority of participants noted movement toward more secure attachments, allowing them to better engage with clients. [30] They reported greater awareness of reactions to clients that were due to their own personal histories, allowing them to respond more to clients' needs rather than their own needs. Participants reported that IPNB's perspective on experiences influencing brain development and the mind helped them see individuals' struggles in a less pathological frame. [30] This shift in understanding client struggles was deemed likely to improve the empathy and thus, interpersonal relationship and selected interventions between practitioner and client.

The subjective nature of the IPA framework and small sample size limits the reliability and validity of the study. Participants had relatively homogenous gender and ethnic characteristics, limiting the study's generality.

Meyer et al. 2013

Meyer, et al. (2013) addressed IPNB through the biological and interpersonal processes occurring within infant/caregiver relationships, and what this development of the nature vs nurture debate implies for counsellors. The study encouraged counsellors to take a holistic approach to practice, incorporating natural and nurturing influences, such as viewing the emotions learned from caregivers in relation to psychological functioning. Counsellors may measure constructs such as affect regulation to understand a patient's emotional development and relate it to the state of integrative fibres in the prefrontal cortex and limbic system. It recommended implementing IPNB concepts of attachment into the counselling relationship helping form a secure attachment between counsellor and client and aiding the client to reconstruct healthy affect patterns in a safe environment. The study advocated attuned communication, emotional mirroring, and empathy. It advised counsellors to determine what emotional patterns are in effect and attempt the neural wiring of healthy patterns. [8]

Therapies

Badenoch and Cox, 2013

Badenoch and Cox's (2013) text shares their experience of integrating IPNB into group therapy. It reported increased empathetic and mindful awareness between therapist and group members via a thorough understanding of IPNB. They report that this mindful awareness of the self and others assists the integration between prefrontal cortex and limbic regions, enhancing emotional regulation and sense of confidence, followed by increased compassion. This reported calmness provides calms the room, allowing a larger range of experiences to emerge. Infant-caregiver relationships in IPNB are explored to allow patients to recognise that previously believed character flaws may actually be indicative of neurobiological development issues, which decrease shame and heighten self-compassion. Information on neuroplasticity suggesting the potential to rewire unhealthy neural pathways is reported to have alleviated longstanding struggles within the group. [31]

An implicit memory activity involving the recall of a recent pleasant experience e.g., "playing frisbee with my dog in the park last Sunday," and reflecting afterwards was reportedly effective in the group therapy. [31] Recalling the positive feeling allowed patients to be more in-touch with their emotions and strengthen their emotional control. Understanding the types of memories and emotions may enable a group therapist to see participants with greater clarity and to discern the memory patterns affecting the movement or sensations of the body. [31] It may allow group therapists to maintain therapist-patient connections. [31]

Other

Page, L. 2006

Page's (2006) journal illustrates the application of IPNB concepts into leadership/management in constituting organisational change. Page states the mindful and social awareness IPNB-informed teachings can induce may allow more collaborative, contingent communication, allowing others to 'feel felt.' Page then believes this attuned communication and energy is then imitated and mirrored by employees. Over time, neural, mental, and behavioral patterns become engrained within the organisation, encouraging employees to take on the challenge of distributed leadership, enhancing individual and organizational complexity. [32]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amygdala</span> Each of two small structures deep within the temporal lobe of complex vertebrates

The amygdala is one of two almond-shaped clusters of nuclei located deep and medially within the temporal lobes of the brain's cerebrum in complex vertebrates, including humans. Shown to perform a primary role in the processing of memory, decision making, and emotional responses, the amygdalae are considered part of the limbic system. The term "amygdala" was first introduced by Karl Friedrich Burdach in 1822.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Limbic system</span> Set of brain structures involved in emotion and motivation

The limbic system, also known as the paleomammalian cortex, is a set of brain structures located on both sides of the thalamus, immediately beneath the medial temporal lobe of the cerebrum primarily in the forebrain.

Affective neuroscience is the study of how the brain processes emotions. This field combines neuroscience with the psychological study of personality, emotion, and mood. The basis of emotions and what emotions are remains an issue of debate within the field of affective neuroscience.

Reduced affect display, sometimes referred to as emotional blunting or emotional numbing, is a condition of reduced emotional reactivity in an individual. It manifests as a failure to express feelings either verbally or nonverbally, especially when talking about issues that would normally be expected to engage emotions. In this condition, expressive gestures are rare and there is little animation in facial expression or vocal inflection. Additionally, reduced affect can be symptomatic of autism, schizophrenia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, depersonalization disorder, schizoid personality disorder or brain damage. It may also be a side effect of certain medications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orbitofrontal cortex</span> Region of the prefrontal cortex of the brain

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is a prefrontal cortex region in the frontal lobes of the brain which is involved in the cognitive process of decision-making. In non-human primates it consists of the association cortex areas Brodmann area 11, 12 and 13; in humans it consists of Brodmann area 10, 11 and 47.

Joseph E. LeDoux is an American neuroscientist whose research is primarily focused on survival circuits, including their impacts on emotions such as fear and anxiety. LeDoux is the Henry and Lucy Moses Professor of Science at New York University, and director of the Emotional Brain Institute, a collaboration between NYU and New York State with research sites at NYU and the Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research in Orangeburg, New York. He is also the lead singer and songwriter in the band The Amygdaloids.

The amygdalofugal pathway is one of the three major efferent pathways of the amygdala, meaning that it is one of the three principal pathways by which fibers leave the amygdala. It leads from the basolateral nucleus and central nucleus of the amygdala. The amygdala is a limbic structure in the medial temporal lobe of the brain. The other main efferent pathways from the amygdala are the stria terminalis and anterior commissure.

Frontostriatal circuits are neural pathways that connect frontal lobe regions with the basal ganglia (striatum) that mediate motor, cognitive, and behavioural functions within the brain. They receive inputs from dopaminergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, and cholinergic cell groups that modulate information processing. Frontostriatal circuits are part of the executive functions. Executive functions include the following: selection and perception of important information, manipulation of information in working memory, planning and organization, behavioral control, adaptation to changes, and decision making. These circuits are involved in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease as well as neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and in neurodevelopmental disorder such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The developmental needs meeting strategy (DNMS) is a psychotherapy approach developed by Shirley Jean Schmidt. It is designed to treat adults with psychological trauma wounds and with attachment wounds. The DNMS is an ego state therapy based on the assumption that the degree to which developmental needs were not adequately met is the degree to which a client may be stuck in childhood. This model aims to identify ego states that are stuck in the past and help them get unstuck by remediating those unmet developmental needs. The processing starts with the DNMS therapist guiding a patient to mobilize three internal Resource ego states: a Nurturing Adult Self, a Protective Adult Self, and a Spiritual Core Self. The therapist then guides these three Resources to gently help wounded child ego states get unstuck from the past by meeting their unmet developmental needs, helping them process through painful emotions, and by establishing an emotional bond. The relationship wounded child parts have with these Resources is considered the primary agent for change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ventromedial prefrontal cortex</span> Body part

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is a part of the prefrontal cortex in the mammalian brain. The ventral medial prefrontal is located in the frontal lobe at the bottom of the cerebral hemispheres and is implicated in the processing of risk and fear, as it is critical in the regulation of amygdala activity in humans. It also plays a role in the inhibition of emotional responses, and in the process of decision-making and self-control. It is also involved in the cognitive evaluation of morality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel J. Siegel</span> Psychiatry professor and executive director of the Mindsight Institute

Daniel J. Siegel is a clinical professor of psychiatry at the UCLA School of Medicine and executive director of the Mindsight Institute.

Emotional self-regulation or emotion regulation is the ability to respond to the ongoing demands of experience with the range of emotions in a manner that is socially tolerable and sufficiently flexible to permit spontaneous reactions as well as the ability to delay spontaneous reactions as needed. It can also be defined as extrinsic and intrinsic processes responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and modifying emotional reactions. Emotional self-regulation belongs to the broader set of emotion regulation processes, which includes both the regulation of one's own feelings and the regulation of other people's feelings.

Consumer neuroscience is the combination of consumer research with modern neuroscience. The goal of the field is to find neural explanations for consumer behaviors in individuals both with or without disease.

Child neglect, often overlooked, is the most common form of child maltreatment. Most perpetrators of child abuse and neglect are the parents themselves. A total of 79.4% of the perpetrators of abused and neglected children are the parents of the victims, and of those 79.4% parents, 61% exclusively neglect their children. The physical, emotional, and cognitive developmental impacts from early childhood neglect can be detrimental, as the effects from the neglect can carry on into adulthood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parental brain</span>

Parental experience, as well as changing hormone levels during pregnancy and postpartum, cause changes in the parental brain. Displaying maternal sensitivity towards infant cues, processing those cues and being motivated to engage socially with her infant and attend to the infant's needs in any context could be described as mothering behavior and is regulated by many systems in the maternal brain. Research has shown that hormones such as oxytocin, prolactin, estradiol and progesterone are essential for the onset and the maintenance of maternal behavior in rats, and other mammals as well. Mothering behavior has also been classified within the basic drives.

The biological basis of personality it is the collection of brain systems and mechanisms that underlie human personality. Human neurobiology, especially as it relates to complex traits and behaviors, is not well understood, but research into the neuroanatomical and functional underpinnings of personality are an active field of research. Animal models of behavior, molecular biology, and brain imaging techniques have provided some insight into human personality, especially trait theories.

Even though intimacy has been broadly defined in terms of romantic love and sexual desire, the neuroanatomy of intimacy needs further explanation in order to fully understand their neurological functions in different components within intimate relationships, which are romantic love, lust, attachment, and rejection in love. Also, known functions of the neuroanatomy involved can be applied to observations seen in people who are experiencing any of the stages in intimacy. Research analysis of these systems provide insight on the biological basis of intimacy, but the neurological aspect must be considered as well in areas that require special attention to mitigate issues in intimacy, such as violence against a beloved partner or problems with social bonding.

Changing hormone levels during pregnancy and postpartum as well as parental experience cause changes in the parental brain. Both the father and mother undergo distinct biological changes as they transition to parents, but the changes that occur in the paternal brain are not as well studied. Similar to the changes that occur in the maternal brain, the same areas of the brain are activated in the father, and hormonal changes occur in the paternal brain to ensure display of parenting behavior. In only 5% of mammalian species, including humans, the father plays a significant role in caring for his young. Paternal caregiving has independently evolved multiple times in mammals, and can appear in some species under captivity.

Social cognitive neuroscience is the scientific study of the biological processes underpinning social cognition. Specifically, it uses the tools of neuroscience to study "the mental mechanisms that create, frame, regulate, and respond to our experience of the social world". Social cognitive neuroscience uses the epistemological foundations of cognitive neuroscience, and is closely related to social neuroscience. Social cognitive neuroscience employs human neuroimaging, typically using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Human brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation are also used. In nonhuman animals, direct electrophysiological recordings and electrical stimulation of single cells and neuronal populations are utilized for investigating lower-level social cognitive processes.

Nadine Gogolla is a Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology in Martinsried, Germany as well as an Associate Faculty of the Graduate School for Systemic Neuroscience. Gogolla investigates the neural circuits underlying emotion to understand how the brain integrates external cues, feeling states, and emotions to make calculated behavioral decisions. Gogolla is known for her discovery using machine learning and two-photon microscopy to classify mouse facial expressions into emotion-like categories and correlate these facial expressions with neural activity in the insular cortex.

References

  1. Clinton, Tim; Sibcy, Gary (June 2012). "Christian Counseling, Interpersonal Neurobiology, and the Future". Journal of Psychology and Theology. 40 (2): 141–145. doi:10.1177/009164711204000211. ISSN   0091-6471. S2CID   141499141.
  2. 1 2 3 The developing mind: how relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. 2012-10-01.
  3. Bowlby, John. (2 December 2008). Attachment and loss. ISBN   978-1-4070-7132-9. OCLC   1005519675.
  4. Schore, Allan N. (December 1997). "Early organization of the nonlinear right brain and development of a predisposition to psychiatric disorders". Development and Psychopathology. 9 (4): 595–631. doi:10.1017/s0954579497001363. ISSN   0954-5794. PMID   9448998. S2CID   782859.
  5. 1 2 3 Ng, Sharon Joy (2017-08-04). "Developmental Interpersonal Neurobiology, Attachment Style and Mindsight". Psychology and Cognitive Sciences - Open Journal. 3 (3): e9–e13. doi: 10.17140/pcsoj-3-e007 . ISSN   2380-727X.
  6. Lipton, Bruce H. (2012). Spontaneous evolution : our positive future (and a way to get there from here). Hay House. ISBN   978-1-4019-2631-1. OCLC   866088900.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 SIEGEL, DANIEL J. (2020). DEVELOPING MIND : how relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. GUILFORD. ISBN   978-1-4625-4275-8. OCLC   1113408719.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Meyer, Dixie; Wood, Sara; Stanley, Bethany (April 2013). "Nurture Is Nature: Integrating Brain Development, Systems Theory, and Attachment Theory". The Family Journal. 21 (2): 162–169. doi:10.1177/1066480712466808. ISSN   1066-4807. S2CID   10449229.
  9. Griffin, William A.; Greene, Shannon M. (2013-10-28). Models Of Family Therapy. doi:10.4324/9780203727584. ISBN   9780203727584.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Codrington, Rebecca (September 2009). "A Family Therapist's Look Into Interpersonal Neurobiology and the Adolescent Brain: An Interview With Dr Daniel Siegel". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 31 (3): 285–299. doi:10.1375/anft.31.3.285. ISSN   0814-723X.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Siegel, Daniel J. (June 2006). "The mind in psychotherapy: An interpersonal neurobiology framework for understanding and cultivating mental health". Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 92 (2): 224–237. doi:10.1111/papt.12228. ISSN   1476-0835. PMID   31001926. S2CID   121658470.
  12. Schore, Judith R. (January 2012). "Using Concepts from Interpersonal Neurobiology in Revisiting Psychodynamic Theory". Smith College Studies in Social Work. 82 (1): 90–111. doi:10.1080/00377317.2012.644494. ISSN   0037-7317. S2CID   9976100.
  13. "Triangle of Well-Being | Trauma Recovery" . Retrieved 2020-02-07.
  14. Flores, Philip J.; Porges, Stephen W. (2019-12-18), "Group Psychotherapy as a Neural Exercise: Bridging Polyvagal Theory and Attachment Theory", Attachment in Group Psychotherapy, Routledge, pp. 46–66, doi:10.4324/9781351010818-4, ISBN   978-1-351-01081-8 , retrieved 2020-11-09
  15. Gottlieb, Gilbert (1991). "Epigenetic systems view of human development". Developmental Psychology. 27 (1): 33–34. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.33. ISSN   1939-0599.
  16. Erikson, Erik H. (Erik Homburger), 1902-1994. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis : Youth and Crisis. W.W. Norton. ISBN   0-393-31144-9. OCLC   566548838.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  17. Doidge, Norman, author. (3 April 2017). The brain that changes itself : stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. ReadHowYouWant.com, Limited. ISBN   978-1-5252-4513-8. OCLC   993445153.{{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. Beaudoin, Marie-Nathalie; Zimmerman, Jeffrey (March 2011). "Narrative Therapy and Interpersonal Neurobiology: Revisiting Classic Practices, Developing New Emphases". Journal of Systemic Therapies. 30 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1521/jsyt.2011.30.1.1. ISSN   1195-4396.
  19. Kensinger, Elizabeth A. (August 2007). "Negative Emotion Enhances Memory Accuracy". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 16 (4): 213–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00506.x. ISSN   0963-7214. S2CID   16885166.
  20. "A Closer Look at Children's Skills", Boosting ALL Children's Social and Emotional Brain Power: Life Transforming Activities, Corwin Press, pp. 27–47, 2014, doi:10.4135/9781452284958.n3, ISBN   978-1-4522-5836-2
  21. Siegel, Daniel J. (2009), Mindsight : the new science of personal transformation, Brilliance Audio, ISBN   978-1-5012-2358-7, OCLC   962743641
  22. Atasoy, Selen; Donnelly, Isaac; Pearson, Joel (2016-01-21). "Human brain networks function in connectome-specific harmonic waves". Nature Communications. 7 (1): 10340. Bibcode:2016NatCo...710340A. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10340 . ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   4735826 . PMID   26792267.
  23. Atasoy, Selen. Deco, Gustavo. Kringelbach, Morten L. Pearson, Joel. (2018). "Harmonic Brain Modes: A Unifying Framework for Linking Space and Time in Brain Dynamics". The Neuroscientist. 24 (3): 277–293. doi:10.1177/1073858417728032. OCLC   1051960991. PMID   28863720. S2CID   21655571.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. Weyandt, Lisa; Weyandt, Lisa L. (2006-04-21). The Physiological Bases of Cognitive and Behavioral Disorders. doi:10.4324/9781410615695. ISBN   9781410615695.
  25. Berger, Kathleen Stassen, Verfasser. (2 January 2017). The developing person through the lifespan. Macmillan Learning. ISBN   978-1-319-01587-9. OCLC   990765389.{{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. Acharya, Sourya; Shukla, Samarth (2012). "Mirror neurons: Enigma of the metaphysical modular brain". Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine. 3 (2): 118–124. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.101878 . ISSN   0976-9668. PMC   3510904 . PMID   23225972.
  27. Haft, Wendy L.; Slade, Arietta (1989). "Affect Attunement and Maternal Attachment: A Pilot Study". Infant Mental Health Journal. 10 (3): 157–172. doi:10.1002/1097-0355(198923)10:3<157::aid-imhj2280100304>3.0.co;2-3. ISSN   0163-9641.
  28. Hooper, Lisa M. (July 2007). "The Application of Attachment Theory and Family Systems Theory to the Phenomena of Parentification". The Family Journal. 15 (3): 217–223. doi:10.1177/1066480707301290. ISSN   1066-4807. S2CID   145625155.
  29. Joseph, R. (1999). "Environmental influences on neural plasticity, the limbic system, emotional development, and attachment". Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 29 (3): 189–208. doi:10.1023/A:1022660923605. PMID   10080962. S2CID   22812181.
  30. 1 2 3 Miller, Raissa M.; Barrio Minton, Casey A. (January 2016). "Experiences Learning Interpersonal Neurobiology: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis". Journal of Mental Health Counseling. 38 (1): 47–61. doi:10.17744/mehc.38.1.04. ISSN   1040-2861.
  31. 1 2 3 4 Badenoch, Bonnie; Cox, Paul (2018-05-15), "Integrating interpersonal neurobiology with group psychotherapy*", The Interpersonal Neurobiology of Group Psychotherapy and Group Process, Routledge, pp. 1–23, doi:10.4324/9780429482120-1, ISBN   978-0-429-48212-0
  32. Page, Linda J (2006). "Why Can't We Trust Our Brains?". Critical Thinking, Science, and Pseudoscience. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company: 22–31. doi:10.1891/9780826194268.0005. ISBN   978-0-8261-9419-0 . Retrieved 2022-11-23 via PCPI.

Further reading