Narasimham Committee

Last updated

From the 1991 India economic crisis to its status of third largest economy in the world by 2011, India has grown significantly in terms of economic development, so has its banking sector. During this period, recognizing the evolving needs of the sector, the Finance Ministry of the Government of India set up various committees with the task of analyzing India's banking sector and recommending legislation and regulations to make it more effective, competitive and efficient. [1]

Contents

Two such expert Committees were set up under the chairmanship of Maidavolu Narasimham . They submitted their recommendations in the 1990s in reports widely known as the Narasimham Committee-I (1991) report and the Narasimham Committee-II (1998) Report. These recommendations not only helped unleash the potential of banking in India, they are also recognized as a factor towards minimizing the impact of global financial crisis starting in 2007.

Unlike the dirigist era up until the mid-1980s, India is no longer insulated from the global economy. The banks in India survived the 2008 financial crisis relatively unscathed, a feat due in part to these Narasimham Committees. [2]

Background

During the decades of the 60s and the 70s, India nationalised most of its banks. This culminated with the balance of payments crisis of the Indian economy where India had to airlift gold to International Monetary Fund (IMF) to loan money to meet its financial obligations. This event called into question the previous banking policies of India and triggered the era of economic liberalization in India in 1991.

Given the rigidities and weaknesses had made serious inroads into the Indian banking system by the late 1980s, the Government of India, post-crisis, took several steps to remodel the country's financial system. [3] The banking sector, handling 80% of the flow of money in the economy, needed serious reforms to make it internationally reputable, accelerate the pace of reforms and develop it into a constructive usher of an efficient, vibrant and competitive economy by adequately supporting the country's financial needs. [4]

In the light of these requirements, two expert Committees were set up in 1990s under the chairmanship of M. Narasimham, former Reserve Bank of India governor which are widely credited for spearheading the financial sector reform in India. [3]

The first Narasimhan Committee (Committee on the Financial System – CFS) was appointed by Manmohan Singh as India's Finance Minister on 14 August 1991, [1] [5] and the second one (Committee on Banking Sector Reforms) [6] was appointed by P.Chidambaram [7] as Finance Minister in December 1997. [8] Subsequently, the first one widely came to be known as the Narasimham Committee-I (1991) and the second one as Narasimham-II Committee(1998). [9] [10]

The purpose of the Narasimham-I Committee was to study all aspects relating to the structure, organisation, functions and procedures of the financial systems and to recommend improvements in their efficiency and productivity. The Committee submitted its report to the Finance Minister in November 1991 which was tabled in Parliament on 17 December 1991. [6]

The Narasimham-II Committee was tasked with the progress review of the implementation of the banking reforms since 1992 with the aim of further strengthening the financial institutions of India. [4] It focussed on issues like size of banks and capital adequacy ratio among other things. [9] M. Narasimham, chairman, submitted the report of the Committee on Banking Sector Reforms (Committee-II) to the Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha in April 1998. [4] [9]

Recommendations of the Committee

The 1998 report of the committee to the GOI made the following major recommendations:

Autonomy in Banking

Greater autonomy was proposed for the public sector banks in order for them to function with equivalent professionalism as their international counterparts. [11] For this the panel recommended that recruitment procedures, training and remuneration policies of public sector banks be brought in line with the best-market-practices of professional banking systems. It also recommended the RBI relinquish its seats on the board of directors of these banks. The committee further added that given that the government nominees to the board of banks are often members of parliament, politicians, bureaucrats, etc., they often interfere in the day-to-day operations of the bank in the form of the behest-lending. [4] As such the committee recommended a review of functions of banks boards with a view to make them responsible for enhancing shareholder value through formulation of corporate strategy and reduction of the government equity. [11]

To implement this, criteria for autonomous status was identified by March 1999 (among other implementation measures) and 17 banks were considered eligible for autonomy. [12] But some recommendations like reduction in Government's equity to 33%, [13] [14] the issue of greater professionalism and independence of the board of directors of public sector banks is still awaiting Government follow-through and implementation. [15]

Reform in the role of RBI

First, the committee recommended that the RBI withdraw from the 91-day treasury bills market and that interbank call money and term money markets be restricted to banks and primary dealers. [6] [12] Second, the Committee proposed a segregation of the roles of RBI as a regulator of banks and owner of bank. [16] It observed that "The Reserve Bank as a regulator of the monetary system should not be the owner of a bank in view of a possible conflict of interest". As such, it highlighted that RBI's role of effective supervision was not adequate and wanted it to divest its holdings in banks and financial institutions.

Pursuant to the recommendations, the RBI introduced a Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) operated through repo and reverse repos to set a corridor for money market interest rates. To begin with, in April 1999, an Interim Liquidity Adjustment Facility (ILAF) was introduced pending further upgradation in technology and legal/procedural changes to facilitate electronic transfer. [17] As for the second recommendation, the RBI decided to transfer its respective shareholdings of public banks like State Bank of India (SBI), National Housing Bank (NHB) and National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) to GOI. Subsequently, in 2007–08, GOI decided to acquire entire stake of RBI in SBI, NHB and NABARD. Of these, the terms of sale for SBI were finalised in 2007–08 itself. [18]

Stronger banking system

The Committee recommended for merger of large Indian banks to make them strong enough for supporting international trade. [11] It recommended a three tier banking structure in India through establishment of three large banks with international presence, eight to ten national banks and a large number of regional and local banks. [4] [9] This proposal had been severely criticized by the RBI employees union. [19] The Committee recommended the use of mergers to build the size and strength of operations for each bank. [20] However, it cautioned that large banks should merge only with banks of equivalent size and not with weaker banks, which should be closed down if unable to revitalize themselves. [6] Given the large percentage of non-performing assets for weaker banks, some as high as 20% of their total assets, the concept of "narrow banking" was proposed to assist in their rehabilitation. [11]

There were a string of mergers in banks of India during the late 90s and early 2000s, encouraged strongly by the Government of India in line with the committee's recommendations. [21] However, the recommended degree of consolidation is still awaiting sufficient government impetus. [15]

Non-performing assets

Non-performing assets had been the single largest cause of irritation of the banking sector of India. [4] Earlier the Narasimham Committee-I had broadly concluded that the main reason for the reduced profitability of the commercial banks in India was the priority sector lending. The committee had highlighted that 'priority sector lending' was leading to the buildup of non-performing assets of the banks and thus it recommended it to be phased out. [10] Subsequently, the Narasimham Committee-II also highlighted the need for 'zero' non-performing assets for all Indian banks with International presence. [10] The 1998 report further blamed poor credit decisions, behest-lending and cyclical economic factors among other reasons for the buildup of the non-performing assets of these banks to uncomfortably high levels. The Committee recommended creation of Asset Reconstruction Funds or Asset Reconstruction Companies to take over the bad debts of banks, allowing them to start on a clean-slate. [4] [22] [23] The option of re-capitalization through budgetary provisions was ruled out. Overall the committee wanted a proper system to identify and classify NPAs, [6] NPAs to be brought down to 3% by 2002 [4] and for an independent loan review mechanism for improved management of loan portfolios. [6] The committee's recommendations led to introduction of a new legislation which was subsequently implemented as the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and came into force with effect from 21 June 2002. [24] [25] [26]

Capital adequacy and tightening of provisioning norms

To improve the inherent strength of the Indian banking system the committee recommended that the Government should raise the prescribed capital adequacy norms. [9] This would also improve their risk taking ability. [11] The committee targeted raising the capital adequacy ratio to 9% by 2000 and 10% by 2002 and have penal provisions for banks that fail to meet these requirements. [4] [6] For asset classification, the Committee recommended a mandatory 1% in case of standard assets and for the accrual of interest income to be done every 90 days instead of 180 days. [12]

To implement these recommendations, the RBI in Oct 1998, initiated the second phase of financial sector reforms by raising the banks' capital adequacy ratio by 1% and tightening the prudential norms for provisioning and asset classification in a phased manner on the lines of the Narasimham Committee-II report. [27] The RBI targeted to bring the capital adequacy ratio to 9% by March 2001. [28] The mid-term Review of the Monetary and Credit Policy of RBI announced another series of reforms, in line with the recommendations with the committee, in October 1999. [12]

Entry of foreign banks

The committee suggested that the foreign banks seeking to set up business in India should have a minimum start-up capital of $25 million as against the existing requirement of $10 million. It said that foreign banks can be allowed to set up subsidiaries and joint ventures that should be treated on a par with private banks. [4]

Implementation of recommendations

In 1998, RBI Governor Bimal Jalan informed the banks that the RBI had a three to four-year perspective on the implementation of the committee's recommendations. [27] Based on the other recommendations of the committee, the concept of a universal bank was discussed by the RBI and finally ICICI bank became the first universal bank of India. [17] [29] [30] The RBI published an "Actions Taken on the Recommendations" report on 31 October 2001 on its own website. Most of the recommendations of the Committee have been acted upon (as discussed above) although some major recommendations are still awaiting action from the Government of India. [31]

Criticism

There were protests by employee unions of banks in India against the report. The Union of RBI employees made a strong protest against the Narasimham II Report. [19] There were other plans by the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU), representing about 1.3 million bank employees in India, to meet in Delhi and to work out a plan of action in the wake of the Narasimham Committee report on banking reforms. The committee was also criticized in some quarters as "anti-poor". According to some, the committees failed to recommend measures for faster alleviation of poverty in India by generating new employment. [3] This caused some suffering to small borrowers (both individuals and businesses in tiny, micro and small sectors).

Reception

Initially, the recommendations were well received in all quarters, including the Planning Commission of India leading to successful implementation of most of its recommendations. [32] During the financial crisis of 2007–2008, performance of the Indian banking sector was far better than its international counterparts. This was also credited to the successful implementation of the recommendations of the Narasimham Committee-II with particular reference to the capital adequacy norms and the re-capitalization of the public sector banks. [2] The impact of the two committees has been so significant that elite politicians and financial sectors professionals have been discussing these reports for more than a decade since their first submission applauding their positive contribution

Related Research Articles

Reserve Bank of India Regulatory Body in India

The Reserve Bank of India, chiefly known as, RBI is India's central bank and regulatory body responsible for regulation of the Indian banking system. It is under the ownership of Ministry of Finance, Government of India. It is responsible for the issue and supply of the Indian rupee. It also manages the country's main payment systems and works to promote its economic development. Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran is one of the specialised divisions of RBI through which it prints & mints Indian bank notes and coins. RBI established the National Payments Corporation of India as one of its specialised division to regulate the payment and settlement systems in India. Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation was established by RBI as one of its specialised division for the purpose of providing insurance of deposits and guaranteeing of credit facilities to all Indian banks.

State Bank of India Indian public sector bank

State Bank of India (SBI) is an Indian multinational public sector bank and financial services statutory body headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra. SBI is the 43rd largest bank in the world and ranked 221st in the Fortune Global 500 list of the world's biggest corporations of 2020, being the only Indian bank on the list. It is a public sector bank and the largest bank in India with a 23% market share by assets and a 25% share of the total loan and deposits market. It is also the fifth largest employer in India with nearly 250,000 employees.

ICICI Bank Indian private sector bank

ICICI Bank Limited is an Indian multinational bank and financial services company headquartered in Vadodara. It offers a wide range of banking products and financial services for corporate and retail customers through a variety of delivery channels and specialized subsidiaries in the areas of investment banking, life, non-life insurance, venture capital and asset management.

Basel II is the second of the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. It is now extended and partially superseded by Basel III.

Modern banking in India originated in the mid of 18th century. Among the first banks were the Bank of Hindustan, which was established in 1770 and liquidated in 1829–32; and the General Bank of India, established in 1786 but failed in 1791.

The IDBI Bank Limited is a subsidiary of Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) providing financial and banking services. It was established in 1964 as Industrial Development Bank of India, a development finance institution, which provided financial services to industrial sector. In 2005, the institution was merged with its commercial division, IDBI Bank, forming the present-day banking entity and was categorised as "other public sector banks" category. Later in March 2019, RBI recategorised it as a private bank. Many national institutes find their roots in IDBI like SIDBI, India Exim Bank, National Stock Exchange of India and National Securities Depository Limited.

Maidavolu Narasimham was an Indian banker who served as the thirteenth governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) from 2 May 1977 to 30 November 1977. For his contributions to the banking and financial sector in India, he is often referred to as the father of banking reforms in India. Some of the reforms attributed to his recommendations include changes to banking structures, introduction of private sector banks, creation of asset recovery funds, rural banking, changes to capital adequacy and provisioning standards, technology upgradation and modernization of public sector banks, and capital market linked banking reforms.

Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 of India, engaged in the business of loans and advances, acquisition of shares, stock, bonds, hire-purchase insurance business or chit-fund business, but does not include any institution whose principal business is that of agriculture, industrial activity, purchase or sale of any goods or providing any services and sale/purchase/construction of immovable property.

The economic liberalisation in India refers to the economic liberalisation of the country's economic policies with the goal of making the economy more market and service-oriented and expanding the role of private and foreign investment. Indian economic liberalisation was part of a general pattern of economic liberalisation occurring across the world in the late 20th century. Although some attempts at liberalisation were made in 1966 and the early 1980s, a more thorough liberalisation was initiated in 1991. The reform was prompted by a balance of payments crisis that had led to a severe recession and also as per structural adjustment programs for taking loans from IMF and World Bank.

Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) are government owned scheduled commercial banks of India that operate at regional level in different states of India. These banks are under the ownership of Ministry of Finance, Government of India. They were created to serve rural areas with basic banking and financial services. However, RRBs also have urban branches.

More than half of personal savings are invested in physical assets such as land, houses, cattle, and gold.

Risk-weighted asset is a bank's assets or off-balance-sheet exposures, weighted according to risk. This sort of asset calculation is used in determining the capital requirement or Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) for a financial institution. In the Basel I accord published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Committee explains why using a risk-weight approach is the preferred methodology which banks should adopt for capital calculation:

Yes Bank Indian bank

Yes Bank is an Indian bank headquartered in Mumbai, India and was founded by Rana Kapoor and Ashok Kapur in 2004.

Yezdi Hirji Malegam is an Indian chartered accountant who was the president of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India from 1979 to 1980. He was the chairman of National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards. Since 27 November 2000, he has been a board member of Reserve Bank of India and holds a position as a trustee of The Willingdon Sports Club. He is also engaged in various other fields of business and finance. He has been a director of the Indian Central Bank's board for 17 years.

The Sukhamoy Chakravarty Committee was formed in December 1982 under the chairmanship of Prof. Sukhamoy Chakroborty to assess the functioning of the Indian Monetary system. Its goal was to improve monetary regulation, a feat that was hoped would enable price stability. The committee, which submitted its report in April 1985, believed that price stability was essential for promoting growth and achieving other social objectives.

Money market in India

The Money market in India is a correlation for short-term funds with maturity ranging from overnight to one year in India including financial instruments that are deemed to be close substitutes of money. Similar to developed economies the Indian money market is diversified and has evolved through many stages, from the conventional platform of treasury bills and call money to commercial paper, certificates of deposit, repos, forward rate agreements and most recently interest rate swaps

Public Sector Banks (PSBs) are a major type of government owned banks in India, where a majority stake is held by the Ministry of Finance of the Government of India or State Ministry of Finance of various State Governments of India.. The shares of these banks are listed on stock exchanges. Their main objective is social welfare

Committee on Comprehensive Financial Services for Small Businesses and Low Income Households was an expert committee formed by Raghuram Rajan on 23 September 2013, after he was appointed as the governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). It was headed by Nachiket Mor. The objective of the panel was to study various aspects of financial inclusion in India. The panel submitted its final report on 7 January 2014.

Payments bank New model of banks initiative by Reserve Bank of India

Payments banks are new model of banks, conceptualised by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which cannot issue credit. These banks can accept a restricted deposit, which is currently limited to ₹200,000 per customer and may be increased further. These banks cannot issue loans and credit cards. Both current account and savings accounts can be operated by such banks. Payments banks can issue ATM cards or debit cards and provide online or mobile banking. Bharti Airtel set up India's first payments bank, Airtel Payments Bank.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance (SCOF) is a department related standing committee (DRSC) constituted by the Parliament of India comprising selected members of parliament for the purpose of legislative oversight on the policies and decision making of the following four ministries:

  1. Ministry of Finance (MoF)
  2. Ministry of Corporate Affairs
  3. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation
  4. NITI Aayog

References

  1. 1 2 "Prime Minister's address at RBI Platinum Jubilee Celebrations". Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 1 April 2010. Retrieved 22 February 2011.
  2. 1 2 "Kudos in order, as also more work", Oct13,2008". Business Line. 13 October 2008. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  3. 1 2 3 "Financial reforms and development". S.D.Naik, Business Line, the Hindu. 26 April 2002. Retrieved 22 February 2011.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "BANKING REFORMS,
    Radical prescriptions"    . SUDHA MAHALINGAM, Frontline Vol. 15 :: No. 10. 9–22 May 1998. Archived from the original on 24 October 2008. Retrieved 21 February 2011.    {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  5. ↑ India. Committee on the Financial System; M. Narasimham (1992). Narasimham Committee report on the financial system, 1991. Standard Book Co. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TR Jain; OP Khanna. Macroeconomics. FK Publications. pp. 345–. ISBN   978-81-87140-65-8 . Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  7. ↑ "Financial sector reforms – an assessment". Sudha Sharma, Expressindia.com. 30 December 1997. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  8. ↑ "Make the Buck Stop". India Today, on the net. 11 December 2000. Archived from the original on 24 November 2010. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 "Narasimham Committee Report 1991 1998 – Recommendations". Gaurav Akrani. 16 September 2010. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  10. 1 2 3 "Vidyanidhi Document" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/PublicationReport/Pdfs/24157.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  12. 1 2 3 4 anurag. "Banking Sector Reforms 1999–2000". Banknetindia.com. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  13. ↑ "Now Govt has to top up funds banks need to grow". Business Line. 21 May 2004. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  14. ↑ "Business houses can set up banks". The Economic Times. 2 September 2006. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  15. 1 2 "Budget and banking reforms". K. KANAGASABAPATHY, BusinessLine, Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications. 5 March 2010. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  16. ↑ "Nip state-run banks stake below 51%, Centre told". The Indian Express. 18 August 1998. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  17. 1 2 "Text of the monetary and credit policy 2000–01". The Indian Express. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  18. ↑ "Government acquires entire RBI shareholding in SBI". Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 29 June 2007. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  19. 1 2 "RBI Union's protest article". The Indian Express. 25 April 1998. Retrieved 19 February 2011.[ permanent dead link ]
  20. ↑ "Going ahead with bank mergers". Business Line. 29 January 2010. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  21. ↑ "Govt favors consolidation in banks". Business Line. 29 August 2004. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  22. ↑ "Asset reconstruction firm mooted to issue swap bonds for bad loans". Banking Bureau,Expressindia.com. 6 May 1998. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  23. ↑ "Panel moots ARC to tackle mounting NPA". ENS ECONOMIC BUREAU, Expressindia.com. 6 May 1998. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  24. ↑ "NEW LEGISLATION FOR RECOVERY OF DEBTS". Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 20 May 2002. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  25. ↑ "Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002" (PDF). Retrieved 22 February 2011.
  26. ↑ "Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002" (PDF). Retrieved 22 February 2011.
  27. 1 2 "RBI policy sets deadline for banking reforms". Indian Express Article. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  28. ↑ "Reforms have been taken up in right earnest: Narasimhan". The Indian Express. 31 October 1998. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  29. ↑ ICICI Bank. "History of ICICI Bank". Icicibank.com. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  30. ↑ "First Indian Universal Bank". the banknetindia team. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  31. ↑ "RBI Action Taken Report". Rbi.org.in. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
  32. ↑ "INDIA'S ECONOMIC REFORMS: AN APPRAISAL". Montek Singh Ahluwalia . 26 August 1999.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.