Seneca language

Last updated
Native to United States, Canada
RegionWestern New York and the Six Nations Reserve, Ontario
Ethnicity Seneca
Native speakers
100 (2007) [1]
  • Northern
    • Lake Iroquoian
      • Five Nations
        • Seneca–Cayuga
          • Seneca
Language codes
ISO 639-3 see
Glottolog sene1264
ELP Seneca
Early Localization Native Americans NY.svg
Map of the New York tribes before European arrival, showing the pre-contact distribution of Seneca in western New York
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Seneca ( /ˈsɛnɪkə/ ; [2] in Seneca, Onödowáʼga꞉ or Onötowáʼka꞉) is the language of the Seneca people, one of the Six Nations of the Iroquois League; it is an Iroquoian language, spoken at the time of contact in the western portion of New York. [3] While the name Seneca, attested as early as the seventeenth century, is of obscure origins, the endonym Onödowáʼga꞉ translates to "those of the big hill." [3] About 10,000 Seneca live in the United States and Canada, primarily on reservations in western New York, with others living in Oklahoma and near Brantford, Ontario. As of 2013, an active language revitalization program is underway.


Classification and history

Seneca is an Iroquoian language spoken by the Seneca people, one of the members of the Iroquois Five (later, Six) Nations confederacy. [4] It is most closely related to the other Five Nations Iroquoian languages, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, and Mohawk (and among those, it is most closely related to Cayuga). [5] [3]

Seneca is first attested in two damaged dictionaries produced by the French Jesuit missionary Julien Garnier around the turn of the eighteenth century. It is clear from these documents, and from early nineteenth century Seneca writings, that the eighteenth century saw an extremely high degree of phonological change, such that the Seneca collected by Garnier would likely be mutually unintelligible with modern Seneca. [6] Moreover, as these sound changes appear to be unique to Seneca, they have had the effect of making Seneca highly phonologically divergent from the languages most closely related to it, as well as making the underlying morphological richness of the language incredibly opaque. [7] Today, Seneca is spoken primarily in western New York, on three reservations, Allegany, Cattaraugus, and Tonawanda, and in Ontario, on the Grand River Six Nations Reserve. [3] [4] While the speech community has dwindled to approximately one hundred native speakers, revitalization efforts are underway.


Seneca words are written with 13 letters, three of which can be umlauted, plus the letter colon (꞉) and the acute accent mark. Seneca language is generally written in all-lowercase, and capital letters are only used rarely, even then only for the first letter of a word; all-caps is never used, even on road signs. The vowels and consonants are a, ä, e, ë, i, o, ö, h, j, k, n, s, t, w, y, and ʼ. [8] [9] In some transliterations, t is replaced by d, and likewise k by g; Seneca does not have a phonemic differentiation between voiced and voiceless consonants (see below in Phonology 2.1: Consonants). The letter j can also be replaced by the three-letter combination tsy. (For example, a creek in the town of Coldspring, New York, and the community near it, bears a name that can be transliterated as either jonegano꞉h or tsyo꞉nekano꞉h.)


As per Wallace Chafe's 2015 grammar of Seneca, the consonantal and non-vocalic inventory of Seneca is as follows. [10] Note that orthographic representations of these sounds are given in angled brackets where different than the IPA transcription.

Dental and
and palatal
Velar Glottal
Nasal n
Stop Voicelesstkʔ ʼ
Affricate Voicelesst͡s tst͡ʃ č
Fricative sʃšh
Approximant jyw


A sign in the Seneca language on the Cattaraugus Reservation. This is also an unorthodox example of the use of capital letters in Seneca. DSCN4477 cattaraugusreservationsign e.jpg
A sign in the Seneca language on the Cattaraugus Reservation. This is also an unorthodox example of the use of capital letters in Seneca.

/j/ is a palatal semivowel. After [s] it is voiceless and spirantized [ç]. After [h] it is voiceless [j̊], in free variation with a spirant allophone [ç]. After [t] or [k] it is voiced and optionally spirantized [j], in free variation with a spirant allophone [ʝ]. Otherwise it is voiced and not spirantized [j].

/w/ is a velar semivowel. It is weakly rounded [w].

/n/ is a released apico-alveolar nasal [n̺]. [11]

Oral obstruents

/t/ is an apico-alveolar stop [t̺]. It is voiceless and aspirated [t̺ʰ] before an obstruent or an open juncture (but is hardly audible between a nasalized vowel and open juncture). It is voiced and released [d̺] before a vowel and resonant.

/k/ is a dorso-velar stop [k]. It is voiceless and aspirated [kʰ] before an obstruent or open juncture. It is voiced and released [g] before a vowel or resonant.

/s/ is a spirant with blade-alveolar groove articulation [s]. It is always voiceless, and is fortified to [s˰][ clarification needed ] everywhere except between vowels. It is palatalized to [ʃ] before [j],[ clarification needed ] and lenited to [s˯][ clarification needed ] intervocalically. [11]

/dʒ/ is a voiced postalveolar affricate [dʒ], and /dz/ a voiced alveolar affricate [dz]. Before [i] it is optionally palatalized [dz] in free variation with [dź].[ clarification needed ] [7] Nevertheless, among younger speakers, it appears as though /dʒ/ and /dz/ are in the process of merging to [dʒ]. [12]

Similarly, /tʃ/ is a voiceless postalveolar affricate [tʃ], and /ts/ a voiceless alveolar affricate [ts]. [12]

Laryngeal obstruents

/h/ is a voiceless segment [h] colored[ clarification needed ] by an immediately preceding and/or following vowel and/or resonant.

/ʔ/ is a glottal stop [ʔ]. [7]


The vowels can be subclassified into the oral vowels /i/, /e/, /æ/, /a/, and /o/, and the nasalized vowels /ɛ/ and /ɔ/. Of these vowels, /æ/ is relatively rare, an innovation not shared with other Five Nations Iroquoian languages; even rarer is /u/, a vowel only used to describe unusually small objects. [11] [13] Note that orthographic representations of these sounds are given in angled brackets where different than the IPA transcription.

  Front Back
Close i u
Close-mid e o
Open-mid ɛ̃ ⟨ë⟩ ɔ̃ ⟨ö⟩
(Near)Open æ ⟨ä⟩ ɑ ⟨a⟩

The orthography described here is the one used by the Seneca Bilingual Education Project. The nasal vowels, /ɛ̃/ and /ɔ̃/, are transcribed with tremas on top: ë ö. Depending on the phonetic environment, the nasal vowel ë may vary between [ɛ̃] and [œ̃], whereas ö may vary from [ɔ̃] to [ɑ̃]. [13] Long vowels are indicated with a following :, while stress is indicated with an acute accent over the top. æ is transcribed as ä. [14]

Oral vowels

/i/ is a high front vowel [i].

/e/ is a high-mid front vowel. Its high allophone [ɪ] occurs in postconsonantal position before [i] or an oral obstruent. Its low allophone [e] occurs in all other environments.

/æ/ is a low front vowel [æ].

/a/ is a low central vowel. Its high allophone [ʌ] occurs in postconsonantal position before [i], [w], [j], or an oral obstruent. Its low allophone [ɑ] occurs in all other environments. Before [ɛ] or [ɔ] it is nasalized [æ].[ clarification needed ]

/o/ is a mid back vowel. It is weakly rounded. Its high allophone [ʊ] occurs in postconsonantal position before [i] or an oral obstruent. Its low allophone [o] occurs in all other environments. [11]

/u/ is a rounded high back vowel [u]. It has also, however, been recorded as [ɯ]. [12]

Nasal vowels

/ɛ/ is a low-mid front vowel. It is nasalized [ɛ̃].

/ɔ/ is a low back vowel. It is weakly rounded and nasalized [ɔ̃]. [11]


The following oral diphthongs occur in Seneca: ae, ai, ao, ea, ei, eo, oa, oe, and oi.

The following nasal diphthongs occur as well: aö, eö, and oë.[ clarification needed ] [15]


Vowel length is marked with a colon , and open juncture by word space. [16] Long vowels generally occur in one of two environments: 1. In even-numbered (i.e. falling and even number of syllables from the beginning of the word) word-penultimate syllables not followed by a laryngeal stop; and 2. In odd-numbered penultimate syllables that A. are followed by only one non-vocalic segment before the succeeding vowel, B. are not followed by a laryngeal stop, and C. do not contain the vowel [a] (unless the syllable is word-initial). Moreover, vowels are often lengthened compensitorally as the reflex of a short vowel and an (elided) glottal segment (e.g. vowels are long preceding glottal fricatives elided before sonorants (*V̆hR > V̄R)). [17]

Stress is either strong, marked with an acute accent mark (e.g. ⟨é⟩), or weak, which is unmarked (e.g. ⟨e⟩). [16] Seneca accented short vowels are typically higher in pitch than their unaccented counterparts, while accented long vowels have been recorded as having a falling pitch. Short vowels are typically accented in a trochaic pattern, when they appear in even-numbered syllables preceding A. a laryngeal obstruent, B. a cluster of non-vocalic segments, or C. an odd-numbered syllable containing either A or B. There does not appear to be any upper or lower limit on how many such syllables can be accented – every even-numbered syllable in a word can be accented, but none need be accented. Syllables can also be stressed by means of accent spreading, if an unaccented vowel is followed immediately by a stressed vowel (i.e. VV́ > V́V́). Additionally, word-initial and word-final syllables are underlyingly unaccented, although they can be given sentence level stress. [18]

Syllable structure

Seneca allows both open and closed syllables; a Seneca syllable is considered to be closed when the nucleus is followed by a cluster of multiple consonants. Moreover, [h] appears to be ambisyllabic intervocalically, and can be included in a cluster of multiple non-consonantal segments in the onset. [18]


Seneca is a polysynthetic, agglutinative language with a remarkably rich verbal morphological system, and to a lesser extent, a fairly rich system of nominal morphology as well. Verbs constitute a decisive majority of Seneca words (by one estimate, as much as eighty-five percent of different words), [19] and between the numerous classes of morphemes that can added to the verb root, the generally multiple morphemes constituent thereto, and the variants thereof, a truly staggering number of Seneca verbs is grammatically possible. While most verb forms have multiple allomorphs, however, in the majority of cases, variants of morphemes cannot be reliably predicted on the basis of its phonological environment.

Verbal morphology

Composition of the verb base [20]

The verb base can be augmented by adding a derivational suffix, a middle voice or reflexive prefix, or an incorporated noun root. The common middle voice prefix describes actions performed by on agent and received by that same agent. Its forms, in descending order or prevalence, are as follows:

Forms of the middle voice prefix
-at-Primarily, before roots beginning in vowels or resonants followed by a vowel.
-ate-Before most clusters of multiple consonants.
-ë-Before n, or laryngeal obstruents followed by n.
-atë-In the above environment, but with a historically distinct group of bases
-ën-Before some bases beginning with i.
-an-In the above environment, but with a historically distinct group of bases.
-ër-Before some bases beginning with ah.
-ëni-, -a-Each appears with one verb root each, -sʼoht-, "hand," and -tsëh-, "fire," respectively.

The similar reflexive prefix is nearly semantically identical, the only difference being that the reflexive prefix more clearly distinguishes the two (unitary) roles of agent and recipient. Its forms are not regularly predictable by phonetic environment, and are derived from the underlying form -at-. A noun can be incorporated into the verb base by placing it before the middle voice or reflexive prefix (i.e. at the front of the base noun), such that that noun becomes the patient (or often, instrument or manner) of the verb. In between noun-final and prefix/verb root-initial consonants, the "stem-joining" vowel -a- is epenthesized. The following types of derivational suffixes can be added at the end of a base noun to alter the meaning of the verb; these are as follows (given with the underlying form or most common form of the suffix):

Seneca derivational suffixes
NameFormTranslation or meaningNotes
Ambulative-hne-"while walking"
Andative-h-Indicates that the agent travels to a different location to perform the action.
Andative plus Purposive-e-Indicates that an event is imminent.
Archaic Causative-hw-"cause," "make"Far less common than the New Causative morpheme.
Archaic Reversive-hs-Reverses the meaning of the verb; can often be translated as "un-" (e.g. "tie" > "untie").Less common than the New Reversive morpheme.
Benefactive-ni-, -ne-Indicates that an action has a beneficial or detrimental effect on some party; can be translated as "for him/her/them", etc.
Directive-n-Indicates that an action takes place in the direction of a certain place; can be translated as "there", as in, "go there", "fly there".
Distributive-hö-Indicates that the actions affects parties at multiple places in time and space.
Double Distributive-nyö-Occasionally follows the distributive, does not appear to carry additional semantic weight.
Inchoative-ʼ-"become," "get," "come to be"
Instrumental-hkw-"by means of"
New Causative-ht-"cause," "make"Far more common than the New Causative morpheme.
New Reversive-kw-Reverses the meaning of the verb; can often be translated as "un-" (e.g. "tie" > "untie").More common than the New Reversive morpheme.

Aspect suffixes

Seneca verbs consist of a verb base that represents a certain event or state, which always includes a verb root; this is always followed by an aspect suffix, and almost always preceded by a pronominal prefix. Pronominal prefixes can describe an agent, a patient, or the object of the verb, while aspect suffixes can be habitual or stative, describing four types of meanings: habitual, progressive, stative, and perfect. Bases are classified as "consequential" or "nonconsequential," on the basis of whether or not they "result in a new state of affairs." Nonconsequential bases use habitual aspect suffixes to describe habitual actions, and stative aspect stems to describe progressive actions. Consequential bases use habitual aspect suffixes to describe habitual or progressive actions, and stative aspect stems to describe perfect actions. Some verb roots are said to be stative-only; these typically describe long states (e.g. "to be heavy," "to be old," etc.). Habitual and stative roots are related to the ending of the verb base, but have become largely arbitrary, or at least inconsistent. Additionally, there is a common punctual suffix, an aspect suffix that is added to describe punctual events. It necessarily takes the "modal prefix," which precedes a pronominal prefix, and indicate the relationship of the action described in the verb to reality; these three prefixes are factual, future, and hypothetical. A list of forms of each of the stems is as follows: [21]

Aspect suffixes in Seneca
AspectSuffixes (listed in descending order of frequency)Environment
Forms of the habitual aspect suffix-ahs, -aʼ, -aʼs, -eʼs, -ëh, -ëhs, -h, -haʼ, -hs, -öhs, -s, -ʼsPhonologically unconditioned
Forms of the stative aspect suffix-eʼ, -ëh, -꞉h, -ih, -öh, -ʼ, -∅Phonologically unconditioned
Forms of the punctual aspect suffixesAfter a vowel or resonant; in the latter case, the resonant is deleted, and the preceding vowel lengthened compensatorilly (*VR-ʔ > V̄ʔ)
-꞉ʼAfter vowels, and is clearly related to the above morpheme; it applies to a historically distinct set of verb bases
-∅After obstruents
-tAfter glottal stops
-ëʼ, -aʼ, -a꞉ʼ, -h, -iʼ, -ah, -k, -e꞉ʼ, -꞉hPhonologically unconditioned, or highly unpredictable

Pronominal morphology

The system of pronominal prefixes attached to Seneca verbs is incredibly rich, as each pronoun accounts not only for the agent of an action, but for the recipient of that action (i.e. "patient") as well. For example, the first person singular prefix is k- ~ ke- when there is no patient involved, but kö- ~ köy- when the patient is 2sg, kni- ~ kn- ~ ky- when the patient is 2du., and kwa- ~ kwë- ~ kw- ~ ky- when the patient is 2pl. There are fifty-five possible pronominal pronouns, depending on who is performing an action, and who is receiving that action. These pronouns express number as singular, dual, or plural; moreover, in the case of pronominal prefixes describing agents, there is an inclusive/exclusive distinction in the first person. Gender and animacy are expressed as well in the third person; gender distinctions are made between masculine entities and "feminine-zoic" entities (i.e. women and animals), and inanimacy is distinguished in singular forms. Moreover, before pronominal prefixes, "preproniminal" prefixes carrying a variety of meanings can be placed to modify the meaning of the verb. The prefixes, in the order in which the precede one another, are as follows: [22]

Order of prepronominal prefixes
Coincident or contrastive
Repetitive or cislocative

Nominal morphology [23]

Seneca nominal morphology is far simpler than verbal morphology. Nouns consist of a noun root followed by a noun suffix and a pronominal prefix. The noun suffix appears as either a simple noun suffix (denoting, naturally, that it is a noun), an external locative suffix, denoting that something is "on" or "at" that noun, or an internal locative suffix, denoting that something is "in" that noun. The forms of these are as follows:

- Simple noun suffix: -aʼ ~ -öʼ (in a nasalizing context)

- External locative suffix: -aʼgeh

- Internal locative suffix: -aʼgöh

Nouns are often preceded by pronominal prefixes, but in this context, they represent possession, as opposed to agency or reception. Nouns without pronominal prefixes are preceded by either the neuter patient prefix yo- ~ yaw- ~ ya-, or the neuter agent prefix ka- ~ kë- ~ w- ~ y-. These morphemes do not hold semantic value, and are historically linked to certain noun roots arbitrarily. Finally, certain prepronominal verbal prefixes can be suffixed to nouns to alter the meaning thereof; in particular, the cislocative, coincident, negative, partitive, and repetitive fall into this group.


As much of what, in other languages, might be included in a clause is included in the Seneca word, Seneca features free word order, and cannot be neatly categorized along the lines of a subject/object/verb framework. Rather, new information appears first in the Seneca sentence; when a noun is judged by the speaker to be more "newsworthy" than a verb in the same sentence, it is likely to appear before the verb; should it not be deemed to hold such relevance, it typically follows the verb. [24] Particles, the only Seneca words that cannot be classified as nouns or verbs, [19] appear to follow the same ordering paradigm. Moreover, given the agent/participant distinction that determines the forms of pronominal morphemes, it seems appropriate to consider Seneca a nominative-accusative language. [22]


In Seneca, multiple constituents of a sentence can be conjoined, in a number of ways. They are summarized as follows: [25]

Seneca conjunctions
'and'Appears[ what appears? ] between any two verb phrases.
koh'and'Usually appears as a postpositional conjunction.
háéʼgwah or há꞉ʼgwah'also,' 'too'Joins "constituents of equal weight;" position varies.
gi꞉h'or'Usually appears between the two alternatives.
giʼsëh'maybe'Usually appears sentence-finally.
giʼsëh ... giʼsëh'either ... or'The first element appears between the two alternatives, where as the second element appears immediately after both (as in English)
gwa꞉h heh'but'Usually appears before the clause that it introduces.
sëʼëh'because'Usually appears before the reason introduced.


The words utilized in Seneca to identify referents based on their position in time and space are characterized by a proximal/distal distinction, as seen in the following demonstrative pronouns: [26]

Deictic pronouns
në꞉dah'this one here'
né꞉neʼ'that one here'
neʼhoh'that,' 'there'

Language revitalization

Bilingual stop signs, erected in 2016, on the Allegany Indian Reservation in Jimerson Town, New York. Top is in English; bottom is in Seneca. Sae'he't stop sign in Seneca.jpg
Bilingual stop signs, erected in 2016, on the Allegany Indian Reservation in Jimerson Town, New York. Top is in English; bottom is in Seneca.

In 1998, the Seneca Faithkeepers School was founded as a five-day-a week school to teach children the Seneca language and tradition. [27] In 2010, K-5 Seneca language teacher Anne Tahamont received recognition for her work with students at Silver Creek School and in language documentation, presenting "Documenting the Seneca Language' using a Recursive Bilingual Education Framework" at the International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation (ICLDC). [28]

As of summer 2012,

The fewer than 50 native speakers of the Seneca Nation of Indians' language would agree that it is in danger of becoming extinct. Fortunately, a $200,000 federal grant for the Seneca Language Revitalization Program has further solidified a partnership with Rochester Institute of Technology that will help develop a user-friendly computer catalogue allowing future generations to study and speak the language.

The revitalization program grant, awarded to RIT's Native American Future Stewards Program, is designed to enhance usability of the Seneca language. [29]

The project will develop "a user-friendly, web-based dictionary or guide to the Seneca language." [30] "Robbie Jimerson, a graduate student in RIT's computer science program and resident of the Cattaraugus Indian Reservation near Buffalo," who is working on the project, commented: "My grandfather has always said that a joke is funnier in Seneca than it is in English." [31] As of January 2013, a Seneca language app was under development. [32]

As of fall 2012, Seneca language learners are partnering with fluent mentors, and a newsletter, Gae꞉wanöhgeʼ! Seneca Language Newsletter, is available online. [33]

Although Seneca-owned radio station WGWE (whose call sign derives from "gwe," a Seneca word roughly translating to "what's up?") broadcasts primarily in English, it features a daily "Seneca Word of the Day" feature before each noon newscast, broadcasts a limited amount of Seneca-language music, and makes occasional use of the Seneca language in its broadcasts in a general effort to increase awareness of the Seneca language by the general public.

In 2013, the first public sports event was held in the Seneca language, when middle school students served as announcers for a lacrosse match. [34]

Bilingual road signs, such as stop signs and speed limit signs, appear in the Seneca capital of Jimersontown; these signs were erected in 2016. Prior to this, as part of the upgrade to Interstate 86, the names of townships within the Allegany Indian Reservation were marked in Seneca along the highway in Comic Sans.

Sample texts

"Funny Story"

As translated by Nils M. Holmer. [35] Note: for clarity, certain graphemes employed by Mr. Holmer have been replaced with their modern, standard equivalents.

In Seneca

1. hatinöhsutkyöʼ yatatateʼ wayatuwethaʼkyöʼ. 2. tyëkwahkyöʼshö katyeʼ citeʼö hukwa uswëʼtut katyeʼ nekyöʼ nehuh hösakayöʼ. 3. tatyöʼkyöʼshö katyeʼ tötakayakëʼt. 4. tatyöʼkyöʼshö skatyeʼ hösakayöʼ. 5. tatyöʼshö katyeʼ tötakayakëʼt.

Literal translation

1. They-had-a-house-it-is-said they-are-grandfather-and-grandson they-went-hunting-it-is-said. 2. All-of-a-sudden-they-say it-flies a-bird nearby it-hollow-tree then-it-is-said here it-went-into. 3. In-just-a-little-while it-flies just-a-little-while it-flew-again. 4. In-just-a-little-while it-flew-again it-went-in. 5. In-just-a-little-while it-flies it-came-out-again.

Free translation

A grandfather and a grandson had a house, it is said; they went hunting. All of a sudden a bird came flying (from) near a hollow tree; then, it is said, it flew into it. After a little while it flew in again. After a little while, it flew back (into the hollow tree). After a while it came flying out again, etc.

"The Burning of Pittsburgh"

As translated by Nils M. Holmer; unfortunately, the story is not preserved completely. [36] Note: for clarity, certain graphemes employed by Mr. Holmer have been replaced with their modern, standard equivalents.

In Seneca

1. wae neʼkyöʼ nökweʼöweh ëötinötëʼtaʼ työtekëʼ skat tewënyaʼe kei (corrected: wis) niwashë keiskai nyushake nyuweʼ. 2. wäönöhtakuʼkeʼö a꞉tinötëʼtaʼ neʼkeʼö. 3. tyuhateisyöʼkeʼö tkayasöh waatinötayë꞉. 4. kanyuʼkeʼö wäönöhtakuʼ a꞉tyueʼtaʼ kanötayë꞉ʼ tanëh tethönöhtëtyöʼ. 5. tanë(h) hatyunyaʼtak (?) catek ne hënökweʼöweh. 6. thönöëcatek ne hënökweʼöweh. 7. tekyöʼ tyushiyaköh (?) kanöhkaʼitawiʼ. 8. cyäöwauwiʼ nuytiyenöweʼöh hënökweʼöweh ...

Literal translation

1. Therefore, so-it-is-said the-Indians they-will-burn-the-city Pittsburgh four hundred four tens and-one years ago. 2. They-failed-it-is-said that-they-burn-the-city so-it-is-said. 3. Fallen-timber-it-is-said where-it-is-called they-camped. 4. When-it-is-said they-failed that-they-burn the-city then they-went-back. 5. Then they-used-to-tell Kanöhka'itawi'-it-is-said what-they-tried-to-do the-Indians. 6. There-they-used-to-own-land the Indians. 7. Eight years-old Kanöhka'itawi' 8. When-they-told-him what-they-tried-to-do the-Indians ...

Free translation

Therefore, it is said, the Indians intended to burn (the city of) Pittsburgh one-hundred-and-forty (fifty) -four years ago. They failed to burn the city, so it is told. At the place which is called Fallen Timber, there they camped. When they failed to burn the city they returned (to the camp). Then they used to tell a boy, whose name was Kanöhka'itawi', of what they tried to do. The Indians used to own the land (they would tell him). Eight years old was Kanöhka'itawi'. When they told him what the Indians tried to do ... (the story was not finished).

See also


  1. Seneca at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
  2. Laurie Bauer, 2007, The Linguistics Student's Handbook, Edinburgh
  3. 1 2 3 4 Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. p. 1. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  4. 1 2 Holmer, Nils M. (1954). The Seneca Language (A Study in Iroquoian). Upsala: Upsala Canadian Studies. p. 11.
  5. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Berkeley: University of California Publications. p. 1. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  6. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Berkeley: University of California Publications. p. 2. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  7. 1 2 3 Chafe, 1967, p. 6
  8. Chafe, 1963, p.4
  9. Preston, 1949, p.23
  10. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. p. 10. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Chafe, 1967, p. 5, 8, 15-18
  12. 1 2 3 Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. p. 9. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  13. 1 2 Campbell, George L. (2004). Compendium of the World's Languages . Taylor & Francis. p.  1474. ISBN   0-415-20297-3.
  14. Harvey, Christopher (February 22, 2008). "Onödowága – Seneca". The LinguaSphere Online. Retrieved 2008-06-27.
  15. Holmer, 1952, p. 217
  16. 1 2 Chafe, 1960, p. 12
  17. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. pp. 12–13. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  18. 1 2 Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. pp. 14–15. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  19. 1 2 Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. p. 23. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  20. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oaklands: University of California Publications. pp. 61–75. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  21. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. pp. 23–29. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  22. 1 2 Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. pp. 31–36. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  23. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. pp. 86–91. ISBN   978-0-520-28641-2.
  24. Chafe, Wallace (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. p. 147. ISBN   978-1-897367-13-1.
  25. Carzis, Peter (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: University of California Publications. pp. 149–51. ISBN   978-1-897367-13-1.
  26. Carzis, Peter (2015). A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Oakland: A Grammar of the Seneca Language. p. 119. ISBN   978-1-897367-13-1.
  27. Dan Herbeck (2004-06-05). "Seneca Faithkeepers School Tries to Keep Alive the Tribe's Traditional Ways, Language". Canku Ota (Many Paths) An Online Newsletter Celebrating Native America (114). Archived from the original on 2015-04-02. Retrieved 2012-09-27.
  28. Nicole Gugino. "Teacher feted for work with language of the Senecas". The Observer, Archived from the original on 2011-01-05. Retrieved 2012-09-27.
  29. "RIT Partners with Seneca Nation to Preserve 'Endangered' Language" . Retrieved 2012-09-27.
  30. Tim Louis Macaluso (2012-07-04). "New life for Seneca language". City Newspaper. Retrieved 2012-09-27.
  31. "RIT Partners with Seneca Indian Nation to Preserve 'Endangered' Native Language". RIT News. Archived from the original on 2012-12-12. Retrieved 2012-09-27.
  32. Diana Louise Carter (2013-01-07). "Want to speak Seneca? There's an app for that". Press & Sun-Bulletin. Retrieved 2013-01-12.
  33. Gae꞉wanöhgeʼ! Seneca Language Newsletter(PDF) (in English and Seneca). Vol. Gë꞉ih no. Johdö:h. 2012 . Retrieved 2012-09-27.Missing or empty |title= (help)
  34. "Students announce lacrosse games in Seneca language". The Observer, Dunkirk, NY. 2013-05-10. Retrieved 2013-05-13.
  35. Holmer, Nils M. (1954). The Seneca Language (A Study in Iroquoian). Upsala: Upsala Canadian Studies. pp. 61–2.
  36. Holmer, 1954, pp.63-4

Related Research Articles

Mohawk language Iroquoian language spoken by Mohawks in the United States and Canada

Mohawk is an Iroquoian language currently spoken by around 3,500 people of the Mohawk nation, located primarily in Canada, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and to a lesser extent in the United States. The word "Mohawk" is an exonym. In the Mohawk language, the people say that they are from Kanienʼkehá꞉ka or "Flint Stone Place" or "People of the Flint Nation".

Cheyenne language Native American language spoken by the Cheyenne people, predominantly in present-day Montana and Oklahoma in the United States

The Cheyenne language, is the Native American language spoken by the Cheyenne people, predominantly in present-day Montana and Oklahoma, in the United States. It is part of the Algonquian language family. Like all other Algonquian languages, it has complex agglutinative morphology. This language is considered endangered, at different levels, in both states.

Cherokee language Iroquoian language spoken by the Cherokee people

Cherokee is an endangered-to-moribund Iroquoian language and the native language of the Cherokee people. Ethnologue states that there were 1,520 Cherokee speakers out of 376,000 Cherokee in 2018, while a tally by the three Cherokee tribes in 2019 recorded ~2,100 speakers. The number of speakers is in decline. About eight fluent speakers die each month, and only a handful of people under the age of 40 are fluent. The dialect of Cherokee in Oklahoma is "definitely endangered", and the one in North Carolina is "severely endangered" according to UNESCO. The Lower dialect, formerly spoken on the South Carolina–Georgia border, has been extinct since about 1900. The dire situation regarding the future of the two remaining dialects prompted the Tri-Council of Cherokee tribes to declare a state of emergency in June 2019, with a call to enhance revitalization efforts.

The Ho-Chunk language, also known as Winnebago, is the traditional language of the Ho-Chunk nation of Native Americans in the United States. The language is part of the Siouan language family, and is closely related to the languages of the Iowa, Missouri, and Oto.

Crow language

Crow is a Missouri Valley Siouan language spoken primarily by the Crow Nation in present-day southeastern Montana. The word, Apsáalooke, translates to "children of the large beaked bird." It is one of the larger populations of American Indian languages with 2,480 speakers according to the 1990 US Census.

Choctaw language

The Choctaw language or Chahta Anumpa, traditionally spoken by the Native American Choctaw people of the southeastern United States, is a member of the Muskogean family. Chickasaw (Chikashshanompa), Choctaw and Houma form the Western branch of the Muskogean language family. Although Chickasaw is sometimes listed as a dialect of Choctaw, more extensive documentation of Chickasaw has shown that Choctaw and Chickasaw are best treated as separate but closely related languages.

Muscogee language

The Muscogee language, also known as Creek, is a Muskogean language spoken by Muscogee (Creek) and Seminole people, primarily in the US states of Oklahoma and Florida. Along with Mikasuki, when it is spoken by the Seminole, it is known as Seminole.

Koasati language

Koasati is a Native American language of Muskogean origin. The language is spoken by the Coushatta people, most of whom live in Allen Parish north of the town of Elton, Louisiana, though a smaller number share a reservation near Livingston, Texas, with the Alabama people. In 1991, linguist Geoffrey Kimball estimated the number of speakers of the language at around 400 people, of whom approximately 350 live in Louisiana. The exact number of current speakers is unclear, but Coushatta Tribe officials claim that most tribe members over 20 speak Koasati. In 2007, the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana, in collaboration with McNeese State University and the College of William and Mary, began the Koasati (Coushatta) Language Project as a part of broader language revitalization efforts with National Science Foundation grant money under the Documenting Endangered Languages program.

Supyire language Language

Supyire, or Suppire, is a Senufo language spoken in the Sikasso Region of southeastern Mali and in adjoining regions of Ivory Coast and Burkina Faso, where it is known as Shempire (Syenpire). In their native language, the noun sùpyìré means both "the people" and "the language spoken by the people".

Tunica language

The Tunica or Luhchi Yoroni language is a language isolate that was spoken in the Central and Lower Mississippi Valley in the United States by Native American Tunica peoples. There are no native speakers of the Tunica language, but as of 2017, there are 32 second language speakers.

Kiowa language

Kiowa or Cáuijògà/Cáuijò:gyà is a Tanoan language spoken by the Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma in primarily Caddo, Kiowa, and Comanche counties. The Kiowa tribal center is located in Carnegie. Like most North American languages, Kiowa is an endangered language.

Tuscarora language

Tuscarora, sometimes called Skaròꞏrə̨ʼ, is the Iroquoian language of the Tuscarora people, spoken in southern Ontario, Canada, North Carolina and northwestern New York around Niagara Falls, in the United States. The historic homeland of the Tuscarora was in eastern North Carolina, in and around the Goldsboro, Kinston, and Smithfield areas. Some Tuscaroras still live in that region after they had migrated to what is now Robeson County, North Carolina.

Cayuga language

Cayuga is a Northern Iroquoian language of the Iroquois Proper subfamily, and is spoken on Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation, Ontario, by around 240 Cayuga people, and on the Cattaraugus Reservation, New York, by fewer than 10.

Wintu is an extinct Wintuan language which was spoken by the Wintu people of Northern California. It was the northernmost member of the Wintun family of languages. The Wintuan family of languages was spoken in the Sacramento River Valley and in adjacent areas up to the Carquinez Strait of San Francisco Bay. Wintun is a branch of the hypothetical Penutian language phylum or stock of languages of western North America, more closely related to four other families of Penutian languages spoken in California: Maiduan, Miwokan, Yokuts, and Costanoan.

Tübatulabal is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language, traditionally spoken in Kern County, California, United States. It is the traditional language of the Tübatulabal, who have now shifted to English. The language originally had three main dialects: Bakalanchi, Pakanapul and Palegawan.

Aguaruna language

Aguaruna is an indigenous American language of the Chicham family spoken by the Aguaruna people in Northern Peru. According to Ethnologue, based on the 2007 Census, 53,400 people out of the 55,7000 ethnic group speak Aguaruna, making up almost the entire population. It is used vigorously in all domains of life, both written and oral. It is written with the Latin script. The literacy rate in Aguaruna is 60-90%. However, there are few monolingual speakers today; nearly all speakers also speak Spanish. The school system begins with Aguaruna, and as the students progress, Spanish is gradually added. There is a positive outlook and connotation in regard to bilingualism. 50 to 75% of the Aguaruna population are literate in Spanish. A modest dictionary of the language has been published.

This article is about the sound system of the Navajo language. The phonology of Navajo is intimately connected to its morphology. For example, the entire range of contrastive consonants is found only at the beginning of word stems. In stem-final position and in prefixes, the number of contrasts is drastically reduced. Similarly, vowel contrasts found outside of the stem are significantly neutralized. For details about the morphology of Navajo, see Navajo grammar.

Ute dialect

Ute is a dialect of the Colorado River Numic language, spoken by the Ute people. Speakers primarily live on three reservations: Uintah-Ouray in northeastern Utah, Southern Ute in southwestern Colorado, and Ute Mountain in southwestern Colorado and southeastern Utah. Ute is part of the Numic branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family. Other dialects in this dialect chain are Chemehuevi and Southern Paiute. As of 2010, there were 1,640 speakers combined of all three dialects Colorado River Numic. Ute's parent language, Colorado River Numic, is classified as a threatened language, although there are tribally-sponsored language revitalization programs for the dialect.

Nottoway language

Nottoway, also called Cheroenhaka, was a language spoken by the Nottoway people. Nottoway is closely related to Tuscarora within the Iroquoian language family. Two tribes of Nottoway are recognized by the state of Virginia: the Nottoway Indian Tribe of Virginia and the Cheroenhaka (Nottoway) Indian Tribe. Other Nottoway descendants live in Wisconsin and Canada, where some of their ancestors fled in the 18th century. The last known speaker, Edith Turner, died in 1838. The Nottoway people are undertaking work for language revival.

Neve’ei, also known as Vinmavis, is an Oceanic language of central Malekula, Vanuatu. There are around 500 primary speakers of Neve’ei and about 750 speakers in total.


Further reading