This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page . (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Ubykh | |
---|---|
tuex̂ıbze | |
Pronunciation | /tʷɜxɨbzɜ/ |
Native to | Circassia |
Region | Sochi |
Ethnicity | Ubykh |
Extinct | 7 October 1992, with the death of Tevfik Esenç |
Northwest Caucasian
| |
Unwritten, but provisional orthographies have been developed | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | uby |
Glottolog | ubyk1235 |
Ubykh (extinct) | |
Ubykh is classified as Extinct according to the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger [1] | |
Ubykh is an extinct Northwest Caucasian language once spoken by the Ubykh people, a subgroup of Circassians who originally inhabited the eastern coast of the Black Sea before being deported en masse to the Ottoman Empire in the Circassian genocide. [2]
The Ubykh language is ergative and polysynthetic, with a high degree of agglutination, with polypersonal verbal agreement and a very large number of distinct consonants but only two phonemically distinct vowels. With around eighty consonants, it has one of the largest inventories of consonants in the world, [3] and the largest number for any language without clicks.
The name Ubykh is derived from Убых (/wɨbɨx/), from Убыхыбзэ, its name in the Adyghe language. It is known in linguistic literature by many names: variants of Ubykh, such as Ubikh, Oubykh (French); and its Germanised variant Päkhy (from Ubykh /tʷɜχɨ/).
Ubykh is distinguished by the following features, some of which are shared with other Northwest Caucasian languages:
Ubykh has 84 phonemic consonants, a record high amongst languages without click consonants, but only 3 phonemic vowels. [5] Four of these consonants are found only in loanwords and onomatopoeiae. There are nine basic places of articulation for the consonants and extensive use of secondary articulation, such that Ubykh has 20 different uvular phonemes. Ubykh distinguishes three types of postalveolar consonants: apical, laminal, and laminal closed. Regarding the vowels, since there are only three phonemic vowels, there is a great deal of allophony.
Ubykh is agglutinative and polysynthetic: /ʃɨkʲʼɐjɨfɜnɜmɨt/ ('we will not be able to go back'), /ɐwqʼɜqʼɜjtʼbɜ/ ('if you had said it'). It is often extremely concise in its word forms.
The boundaries between nouns and verbs is somewhat blurred. Any noun can be used as the root of a stative verb (/mɨzɨ/ 'child', /sɨmɨzɨjtʼ/ 'I was a child'), and many verb roots can become nouns simply by the use of noun affixes (/qʼɜ/ 'to say', /sɨqʼɜ/ 'what I say'). [6] [7]
The noun system in Ubykh is quite simple. It has three main noun cases (the oblique-ergative case may be two homophonous cases with differing function, thus presenting four cases in total):
There are X other cases that exist in Ubykh too:
Nouns do not distinguish grammatical gender. The definite article is /ɐ/ (e.g. /ɐtɨt/ 'the man'). There is no indefinite article directly equivalent to the English a or an, but /zɜ/-(root)-/ɡʷɜrɜ/ (literally 'one'-(root)-'certain') translates French un : e.g. /zɜnɜjnʃʷɡʷɜrɜ/ ('a certain young man').
Number is only marked on the noun in the ergative case, with -/nɜ/. The number marking of the absolutive argument is either by suppletive verb roots (e.g. /ɐkʷɨnblɜs/ 'he is in the car' vs. /ɐkʷɨnblɜʒʷɜ/ 'they are in the car') or by verb suffixes: /ɐkʲʼɜn/ ('he goes'), /ɐkʲʼɐn/ ('they go'). The second person plural prefix /ɕʷ/- triggers this plural suffix regardless of whether that prefix represents the ergative, the absolutive, or an oblique argument:
Note that, in this last sentence, the plurality of it (/ɐ/-) is obscured; the meaning can be either 'You all give it to me' or 'You all give them to me'.
Adjectives, in most cases, are simply suffixed to the noun: /tʃɨbʒɨjɜ/ ('pepper') with /pɬɨ/ ('red') becomes /tʃɨbʒɨjɜpɬɨ/ ('red pepper'). Adjectives do not decline.
Postpositions are rare; most locative semantic functions, as well as some non-local ones, are provided with preverbal elements: /ɐsχʲɜwtxqʼɜ/ ('you wrote it for me'). However, there are a few postpositions: /sɨʁʷɜsɨɡʲɐtɕʼ/ ('like me'), /ɐχʲɨlɐq/ ('near the prince').
Free pronouns in all North-West Caucasian languages lack an ergative-absolutive distinction. [5]
1st Person | 2nd Person | 3rd Person | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Singular | Standard | /s(ɨ)ʁʷɜ/ | /(w(ɨ))ʁʷɜ/(joc. /χɜʁʷɜ/) | /ɐʁʷɜ/ |
AB | /(s)χɜ/ | |||
Plural | Standard | /ʃɨʁʷɜɬɜ/ | /ɕʷɨʁʷɜɬɜ/ | /ɐʁʷɜɬɜ/ |
Tevfik Esenç | /ʃɜɬɜ/ | /ɕʷɜɬɜ/ | ||
Osman Güngür | /ʃɨʁʷɜ/ | /ɕʷɨʁʷɜ/ |
1st Person | 2nd Person | 3rd Person | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Jocular | |||
Singular | /sɨ/- | /wɨ/- | /χɜ/- | /ʁɜ/- |
Plural | /ʃɨ/- | /ɕʷɨ/- | /ɐʁɜ/- |
Possessed nouns have their plurality marked with the affix /-ɜw-/.
/ʃɜwtʃɨ/
/ʃ(ɨ)-ɜw-tʃɨ/
1.POSS-PL-horse
Our horses
A past – present – future distinction of verb tense exists (the suffixes -/qʼɜ/ and -/ɜwt/ represent past and future) and an imperfective aspect suffix is also found (-/jtʼ/, which can combine with tense suffixes). Dynamic and stative verbs are contrasted, as in Arabic, and verbs have several nominal forms. Morphological causatives are not uncommon. The conjunctions /ɡʲɨ/ ('and') and /ɡʲɨlɜ/ ('but') are usually given with verb suffixes, but there is also a free particle corresponding to each:
Pronominal benefactives are also part of the verbal complex, marked with the preverb /χʲɜ/-, but a benefactive cannot normally appear on a verb that has three agreement prefixes already.
Gender only appears as part of the second person paradigm, and then only at the speaker's discretion. The feminine second person index is /χɜ/-, which behaves like other pronominal prefixes: /wɨsχʲɜntʷɨn/ ('he gives [it] to you [normal; gender-neutral] for me'), but compare /χɜsχʲɜntʷɨn/ 'he gives [it] to you [feminine] for me').
Oblique 1 markers are limited to marking the agreement of a noun before a relational preverb and Oblique 2 markers are used for not only marking agreement with local and directional preverbs but also the simple oblique, or dative, arguments. [5]
Absolutive | Oblique (1 and 2) | Ergative | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Person | sg. | /s(ɨ)/- | /s(ɨ)/- ~ /z/ | /s(ɨ)/- ~ /z/ |
pl. | /ʃ(ɨ)/- | /ʃ(ɨ)/- ~ /ʒ/- | /ʃ(ɨ)/- ~ /ʒ/- | |
Second Person | sg. | /wɨ/- | /w(ɨ)/- | /w(ɨ)/- |
pl. | /ɕʷ(ɨ)/- | /ɕʷ(ɨ)/- ~ /ʑʷ(ɨ)/- | /ɕʷ(ɨ)/- ~ /ʑʷ(ɨ)/- | |
sg. (joc., arc.) | /χɜ/- | /χɜ/- | /χɜ/- | |
Third Person | sg. | /ɐ/-,/jɨ/-,/ɨ/-,/Ø/- | /Ø/- | n(ɨ)/-/Ø/- |
pl. | /ɐ/-,/jɨ/-,/Ø/- | /ɐ/- | /ɐ/-,/nɐ/- |
The second-person /χɜ/- is an archaic pronoun used to indicate that the person being referred to is a female, or heckling the speaker in some way.
Dynamic Ubykh verbs are split up in two groups: Group I which contain the simple tenses and Group II which contain derived counterpart tenses. Only the Karaclar dialect uses the progressive tense and the plural is unknown.
The singular-plural distinction is used when the subject, the ergative, is singular or plural.
Square brackets indicate elided vowels; parenthesis indicate optional parts of the stem; and the colon indicates the boundary of a morpheme. [5]
Singular | Plural | |
---|---|---|
Simple Past | -/qʼɜ/ | -/qʼɜ-n(ɜ)/ |
Mirative Past | -/jtʼ/ | -/jɬ(ɜ)/ |
Present | -/n/ | -/ɐ-n/ |
Future I | -/ɜw/ | -/n[ɜ]-ɜw/ |
Future II | -/ɜwːt/ | -/n[ɜ]-ɜwːt/ |
(Progressive) | -/ɜwɨːn/ | ? |
Singular | Plural | |
---|---|---|
Pluperfect | -/qʼɜːjtʼ/ | -/qʼɜːjɬ(ɜ)/ ~ -/qʼɜːnɜːjtʼ/ |
Imperfect | -/nɜːtjʼ/ | -/ɐ-nɜːjɬ(ɜ)/ |
Conditional I | -/ɜwɨːjtʼ/ | -/n[ɜ]-ɜwɨːjɬ(ɜ)/ |
Conditional II | -/ɜwːtʷːqʼɜ/ | -/(n[ɜ]-)ɜwːtʷːqʼɜ(-n)/ |
The verbs in the simple past tense are conjugated with -/qʼɜ/ in the singular and -/qʼɜ-n(ɜ)/ in the plural.
Examples:
Plurality | Person | Ubykh | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
Singular | First-person | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-qʼɜ/ | I ate |
Second-person | /wɨ-fɨ-qʼɜ/ | you ate | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-qʼɜ/ | (s)he ate | |
Plural | First-person | /ʃ(ɨ)-fɨ-qʼɜ-n(ɜ)/ | we ate |
Second-person | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-qʼɜ-n(ɜ)/ | you (all) ate | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-qʼɜ-n(ɜ)/ | they ate |
The verbs in the mirative past tense are conjugated with -/jtʼ/ in the singular and -/jɬ(ɜ)/ in the plural.
Examples:
Plurality | Person | Ubykh | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
Singular | First-person | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-jtʼ/ | I ate apparently |
Second-person | /wɨ-fɨ-jtʼ/ | you ate apparently | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-jtʼ/ | (s)he ate apparently | |
Plural | First-person | /ʃ(ɨ)-fɨ-jɬ(ɜ)/ | we ate apparently |
Second-person | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-jɬ(ɜ)/ | you (all) ate apparently | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-jɬ(ɜ)/ | they ate apparently |
The verbs in the present tense are conjugated with -/n/ in the singular and -/ɐ-n/ in the plural.
Examples:
Plurality | Person | Ubykh | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
Singular | First-person | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-n/ | I eat |
Second-person | /wɨ-fɨ-n/ | you eat | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-n/ | (s)he eats | |
Plural | First-person | /ʃ(ɨ)-f-ɐ-n/ | we eat |
Second-person | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-f-ɐ-n/ | you (all) eat | |
Third-person | /ɐ-f-ɐ-n/ | they eat |
The verbs in the present tense are conjugated with -/ɜw/ in the singular and -/n[ɜ]-ɜw/ in the plural. It conveys a sense of certainty, immediacy, obligation, or intentionality.
Examples:
Plurality | Person | Ubykh | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
Singular | First-person | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜw/ | I certainly will eat |
Second-person | /wɨ-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜw/ | you certainly will eat | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜw/ | (s)he certainly will eat | |
Plural | First-person | /ʃ(ɨ)-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜw/ | we certainly will eat |
Second-person | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜw/ | you (all) certainly will eat | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜw/ | they certainly will eat |
The verbs in the present tense are conjugated with -/ɜwːt/ in the singular and -/n[ɜ]-ɜwːt/ in the plural. It conveys a generic sense of the future as well as an exhortative sense such as: /ʃɨ-kʲʼɜ-n[ɜ]-ɜw/ (let's go!).
Examples:
Plurality | Person | Ubykh | Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
Singular | First-person | /s(ɨ)-f-ɜwːt/ | I will eat |
Second-person | /wɨ-f-ɜwːt/ | you will eat | |
Third-person | /ɐ-f-ɜwːt/ | (s)he will eat | |
Plural | First-person | /ʃ(ɨ)-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜwːt/ | we will eat |
Second-person | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜwːt/ | you (all) will eat | |
Third-person | /ɐ-fɨ-n[ɜ]-ɜwːt/ | they will eat |
In all dialects and speakers, only two static tenses exist: present and past.
Singular | Plural | |
---|---|---|
Present | -/Ø/ | -/n(ɜ)/ |
Past | -/jtʼ/ | -/jɬ(ɜ)/ |
There are five basic aspects that exist besides the aspects that exist within the Ubykh tense system. They are: habitual, iterative, exhaustive, excessive, and potential.
A speaker may combine one of these aspects with another to convey more complex aspects in conjunction with the tenses. [5]
habitual | -/ɡʲɜ/ |
---|---|
iterative | -/ɐj(ɨ)/ |
exhaustive | -/lɜ/ |
excessive | -/tɕʷɜ/ |
potential | -/fɜ/ |
A few meanings covered in English by adverbs or auxiliary verbs are given in Ubykh by verb suffixes:
1st person | 2nd person | 3rd person | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
singular | plural | singular | plural | singular | plural | |
simple | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-n/ | /ʃ(ɨ)-f-ɐ-n/ | /wɨ-fɨ-n/ | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-f-ɐ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-n/ | /ɐ-f-ɐ-n/ |
habitual | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-ɡʲɜ-n/ | /ʃ(ɨ)-f-ɡʲ[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /wɨ-fɨ-ɡʲɜ-n/ | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-ɡʲ[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-ɡʲɜ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-ɡʲ[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ |
iterative | /s(ɨ)-f-ɐj(ɨ)-n/ | /ʃ(ɨ)-f-ɐj(ɨ)-ɐ-n/ | /wɨ-f-ɐj(ɨ)-n/ | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-f-ɐj(ɨ)-ɐ-n/ | /ɐ-f-ɐj(ɨ)-n/ | /ɐ-f-ɐj(ɨ)-ɐ-n/ |
exhaustive | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-lɜ-n/ | /ʃ(ɨ)-fɨ-l[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /wɨ-fɨ-lɜ-n/ | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-l[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-lɜ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-l[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ |
excessive | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-tɕʷɜ-n/ | /ʃ(ɨ)-fɨ-tɕʷ[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /wɨ-fɨ-tɕʷɜ-n/ | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-tɕʷ[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-tɕʷɜ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-tɕʷ[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ |
potential | /s(ɨ)-fɨ-fɜ-n/ | /ʃ(ɨ)-fɨ-f[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /wɨ-fɨ-fɜ-n/ | /ɕʷ(ɨ)-fɨ-f[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-fɜ-n/ | /ɐ-fɨ-f[ɜ]-ɐ-n/ |
Questions may be marked grammatically, using verb suffixes or prefixes:
Other types of questions, involving the pronouns 'where' and 'what', may also be marked only in the verbal complex: /mɐwkʲʼɜnɨj/ ('where are you going?'), /sɐwqʼɜqʼɜjtʼɨj/ ('what had you said?').
Many local, prepositional, and other functions are provided by preverbal elements providing a large series of applicatives, and here Ubykh shows remarkable complexity. Two main types of preverbal elements exist: determinants and preverbs. The number of preverbs is limited, and mainly show location and direction. The number of determinants is also limited, but the class is more open; some determinant prefixes include /tʃɜ/- ('with regard to a horse') and /ɬɜ/- ('with regard to the foot or base of an object').
For simple locations, there are a number of possibilities that can be encoded with preverbs, including (but not limited to):
There is also a separate directional preverb meaning 'towards the speaker': /j/-, which occupies a separate slot in the verbal complex. However, preverbs can have meanings that would take up entire phrases in English. The preverb /jtɕʷʼɐ/- signifies 'on the earth' or 'in the earth', for instance: /ʁɜdjɜɐjtɕʷʼɐnɐɬqʼɜ/ ('they buried his body'; literally, "they put his body in the earth"). Even more narrowly, the preverb /fɐ/- signifies that an action is done out of, into or with regard to a fire: /ɐmdʒɜnzɜtʃɨtʃɜqʲɜfɐstχʷɨn/ ('I take a brand out of the fire').
Writing systems for the Ubykh language have been proposed, [5] but there has never been a standard written form. However, Fenwick gives a guide for their "practical Ubykh orthography", intended to be typeable on a Turkish computer keyboard, which is shown below: [8]
IPA | Orthography | IPA | Orthography | IPA | Orthography | IPA | Orthography |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[ɐ] | a | [z] | z | [tʃʼ] | ç' | [qʼ] | q' |
[ɜ] | e | [s] | s | [ʒ] | j | [ʁ] | ğ |
[ɨ] | ı | [r] | r | [ʃ] | ş | [χ] | x |
[b] | b | [n] | n | [ʒʷ] | ju | [qʲ] | qi |
[p] | p | [l] | l | [ʃʷ] | şu | [qʲʼ] | q'i |
[pʼ] | p' | [ɬ] | lh | [ɖʐ] | cr | [ʁʲ] | ği |
[v] | v | [ɬʼ] | l'h | [ʈʂ] | çr | [χʲ] | xi |
[f] | f | [dʷ] | du | [ʈʂʼ] | ç'r | [qʷ] | qu |
[w] | w | [tʷ] | tu | [j] | y | [qʷʼ] | q'u |
[m] | m | [tʷʼ] | t'u | [ɡ] | g | [ʁʷ] | ğu |
[bˤ] | bh | [dʑ] | ci | [k] | k | [χʷ] | xu |
[pˤ] | ph | [tɕ] | çi | [kʼ] | k' | [qˤ] | qh |
[pˤʼ] | p'h | [tɕʼ] | ç'i | [ɣ] | ĝ | [qˤʼ] | q'h |
[vˤ] | vh | [ʑ] | ji | [x] | x̂ | [ʁˤ] | ğh |
[wˤ] | wh | [ɕ] | şi | [ɡʲ] | gi | [χˤ] | xh |
[mˤ] | mh | [dʑʷ] | cü | [kʲ] | ki | [qʷˤ] | qö |
[d] | d | [tɕʷ] | çü | [kʲʼ] | k'i | [qʷˤʼ] | q'ö |
[t] | t | [tɕʷʼ] | ç'ü | [ɡʷ] | gu | [ʁʷˤ] | ğö |
[tʼ] | t' | [ʑʷ] | jü | [kʷ] | ku | [χʷˤ] | xö |
[dz] | dz | [ɕʷ] | şü | [kʷʼ] | k'u | [h] | h |
[ts] | ts | [dʒ] | c | [xʷ] | x̂u | [ʐ] | jr |
[tsʼ] | ts' | [tʃ] | ç | [q] | q | [ʂ] | şr |
Ubykh syllables have a strong tendency to be CV, although VC and CVC also exist. Consonant clusters are not as large as in Abzhywa Abkhaz or in Georgian, rarely being larger than two terms. Three-term clusters exist in two words - /ndʁɜ/ ('sun') and /pstɜ/ ('to swell up'), [9] but the latter is a loan from Adyghe, and the former more often pronounced /nədʁa/ when it appears alone. Compounding plays a large part in Ubykh and, indeed, in all Northwest Caucasian semantics. For instance, the verb to love is expressed as /ʈʂʼɜnbɨjɜ/ (lit. 'to see well'), [10] as in /ʈʂʼɜnzbɨˈjɜn/'I love him'. [11]
Reduplication occurs in some roots, often those with onomatopoeic values (/χˤɜχˤɜ/, 'to curry[comb]' from /χˤɜ/'to scrape'; /kʼɨrkʼɨr/, 'to cluck like a chicken' [a loan from Adyghe]); and /wɜrqwɜrq/, 'to croak like a frog').
Roots and affixes can be as small as one phoneme. The word /wɜntʷɐn/, 'they give you to him', for instance, contains six phonemes, each a separate morpheme:
However, some words may be as long as seven syllables (although these are usually compounds): /ʂɨqʷʼɜwɨɕɜɬɐdɨtʃɜ/ ('staircase').
As with all other languages, Ubykh is replete with idioms. The word /ntʷɜ/ ('door'), for instance, is an idiom meaning either "magistrate", "court", or "government." However, idiomatic constructions are even more common in Ubykh than in most other languages; the representation of abstract ideas with series of concrete elements is a characteristic of the Northwest Caucasian family. As mentioned above, the phrase meaning "You loved him" translates literally as 'You saw him well'; similarly, "she pleased you" is literally 'she cut your heart'. The term /wɨrɨs/ ('Russian'), an Arabic loan, has come to be a slang term meaning "infidel", "non-Muslim" or "enemy" (see History below).
The majority of loanwords in Ubykh are derived from either Adyghe or Arabic, with smaller numbers from Persian, Abkhaz, and the South Caucasian languages. Towards the end of Ubykh's life, a large influx of Adyghe words was noted; Vogt (1963) notes a few hundred examples. The phonemes /ɡ//k//kʼ/ were borrowed from Arabic and Adyghe. /ɬʼ/ also appears to come from Adyghe, although it seems to have arrived earlier on. It is possible, too, that /ɣ/ is a loan from Adyghe, since most of the few words with this phoneme are obvious Adyghe loans: /pɐɣɜ/ ('proud'), /ɣɜ/ ('testis').
Many loanwords have Ubykh equivalents, but were dwindling in usage under the influence of Arabic, Circassian, and Russian equivalents:
Some words, usually much older ones, are borrowed from less influential stock: Colarusso (1994) sees /χˤʷɜ/ ('pig') as a borrowing from a proto-Semitic *huka, and /ɜɡʲɜrɨ/ ('slave') from an Iranian root; however, Chirikba (1986) regards the latter as being of Abkhaz origin ( ← Abkhaz agər-wa 'lower cast of peasants; slave', literally 'Megrelian').
In the scheme of Northwest Caucasian evolution, despite its parallels with Adyghe and Abkhaz, Ubykh forms a separate third branch of the family. It has fossilised palatal class markers where all other Northwest Caucasian languages preserve traces of an original labial class: the Ubykh word for 'heart', /ɡʲɨ/, corresponds to the reflex /ɡʷə/ in Abkhaz, Abaza, Adyghe, and Kabardian. Ubykh also possesses groups of pharyngealised consonants. All other NWC languages possess true pharyngeal consonants, but Ubykh is the only language to use pharyngealisation as a feature of secondary articulation.
With regard to the other languages of the family, Ubykh is closer to Adyghe and Kabardian[ contradictory ] but shares many features with Abkhaz due to geographic influence; many later Ubykh speakers were bilingual in Ubykh and Adyghe.
While not many dialects of Ubykh existed, one divergent dialect of Ubykh has been noted (in Dumézil 1965:266-269). Grammatically, it is similar to standard Ubykh (i.e. Tevfik Esenç's dialect), but has a very different sound system, which had collapsed into just 62-odd phonemes:
Ubykh was spoken in the eastern coast of the Black Sea around Sochi until 1864, when the Ubykhs were driven out of the region by the Russians. They eventually came to settle in Turkey, founding the villages of Hacı Osman, Kırkpınar, Masukiye and Hacı Yakup. Arabic and Circassian eventually became the preferred languages for everyday communication, and many words from these languages entered Ubykh in that period.
The Ubykh language died out on 7 October 1992, when its last fluent speaker, Tevfik Esenç, died. [2] Before his death, thousands of pages of material and many audio recordings had been collected and collated by a number of linguists, including Georges Charachidzé, Georges Dumézil, Hans Vogt, George Hewitt and A. Sumru Özsoy, with the help of some of its last speakers, particularly Tevfik Esenç and Huseyin Kozan. [2] Ubykh was never written by its speech community, but a few phrases were transcribed by Evliya Çelebi in his Seyahatname and a substantial portion of the oral literature, along with some cycles of the Nart saga, was transcribed. Tevfik Esenç also eventually learned to write Ubykh in the transcription that Dumézil devised.
Julius von Mészáros, a Hungarian linguist, visited Turkey in 1930 and took down some notes on Ubykh. His work Die Päkhy-Sprache was extensive and accurate to the extent allowed by his transcription system (which could not represent all the phonemes of Ubykh) and marked the foundation of Ubykh linguistics.
The Frenchman Georges Dumézil also visited Turkey in 1930 to record some Ubykh and would eventually become the most celebrated Ubykh linguist. He published a collection of Ubykh folktales in the late 1950s, and the language soon attracted the attention of linguists for its small number of phonemic vowels. Hans Vogt, a Norwegian, produced a monumental dictionary that, in spite of its many errors (later corrected by Dumézil), is still one of the masterpieces and essential tools of Ubykh linguistics.
Later in the 1960s and into the early 1970s, Dumézil published a series of papers on Ubykh etymology in particular and Northwest Caucasian etymology in general. Dumézil's book Le Verbe Oubykh (1975), a comprehensive account of the verbal and nominal morphology of the language, is another cornerstone of Ubykh linguistics.
Since the 1980s, Ubykh linguistics has slowed drastically with the most recent treatise being Fenwick's A Grammar of Ubykh (2011), who was also working on a dictionary. [12] The Ubykh themselves have shown interest in relearning their language.
The Abkhaz writer Bagrat Shinkuba's historical novel Bagrat Shinkuba. The Last of the Departed treats the fate of the Ubykh people.
People who have published literature on Ubykh include
Ubykh had been cited in the Guinness Book of Records (1996 ed.) as the language with the most consonant phonemes, but since 2017 the !Xóõ language (a member of the Tuu languages) has been considered by the book to have broken that record, with 130 consonants. [13] Ubykh has 20 uvular and 29 pure fricative phonemes, more than any other known language.
All examples from Dumézil 1968 and retranscribed by Fenwick. [14]
Fáxie
fɐ́χʲɜ
zebıyale
zɜ-bɨj-ɐlɜ
zewaqʼalé
zɜ-wɜqʼ-ɐlɜ́
azecíne
ɐ-zɜ-dʒɨ́-nɜ-n
long.ago one-sheep-COM one-goat-COM 3pABS-RECIP.OBL-accompany-PL-CONV
yaxhewtıní
j[ɜ]-ɐ-χˤ-ɜw:tɨ-nɨ́
aduıgiıqʼén.
ɐ-dʷɨ:gʲɨ-kʲɜ-qʼɜ́-n.
NULL.ABS-3pERG-graze-FUT.II-CONV 3pABS-PVB-enter(PL)-PAST-PL
daxiebzínetʼın
d[ɜ]-ɐ-Ø-χʲɜ-bzɨ́-nɜ-tʼɨn
ábıj
ɐ́-bɨj
ácʼrefén
ɐ-ʈʂʼɜfɜ́-n
SUB-3pABS-3sOBL-BEN-meet-IMPF-NFIN the-sheep -the-front-OBL
giıtıní
Ø-Ø-gʲɨ-tɨ-nɨ́
aqárğue
ɐ-qɐ́rʁʷɜ[-n]
şreğecʼiedeqʼé
Ø-Ø-ʂɜ:ʁɜ-tɕʼɜdɜ-qʼɜ́
3pABS-3sOBL-PVB-be.standing(SG)-CONV the-gully[-OBL] 3sABS-3sOBL-PVB-jump-PAST
deşreğe-çʼiedetʼín
dɜ-Ø-Ø-ʂɜ:ʁɜ-tɕʼɜdɜ-tʼɨ́n
ğekʼuecé
ʁɜ-kʷʼɜtʃɜ́
qʼéşieqʼe
Ø-qʼɜ́ɕɜ-qʼɜ
ğélheqʼen
ʁɜ́-ɬɜqʼɜ-n
SUB-3sABS-3sOBL-PVB-jump-CONV 3sPOSS-tail 3sABS-raise-PAST 3sPOSS-footprint-OBL
giıtuqʼejtʼ
Ø-Ø-gʲɨ́-tʷ-qʼɜ:jtʼ
wuqʼí
wɜqʼɨ́
aşueçegií
ɐ-ʃʷɜtʃɜ-gʲɨ́
3sABS-3sOBL-PVB-be.standing(SG)-PLUP[.NFIN] goat 3sABS-laugh-CONV
mğiawqʼé
Ø-mʁʲɐ-w-qʼɜ́
«wıtxiéşeçen
«wɨ-t-χʲɜ́-ʃʷɜtʃɜ-n
3sABS-PVB-enter(SG)-PAST «2sABS-REL-BEN-laugh-PRES
sákiıy?»
Ø-sɐ́kʲɨ-j?»
qʼɜn
Ø-qʼɜ-n
aweqʼín
ɐ-wɜqʼɨ́-n
3sABS-what[.STAT.PRES.NFIN]-INTERR 3sABS-say-CONV the-goat-OBL
déğadzğetʼín
dɜ́-Ø-ʁ[ɜ]-ɐ-dzʁɜ-tʼɨn
«wípşe
«wɨ́-pʃɜ
zbyeqʼé
Ø-z-bjɜ-qʼɜ́
SUB-3sABS-3sPOSS-PVB-ask-CONV «3sPOSS-bottom 3sABS-1sERG-see-PAST
wenéci
Ø-wɜnɜ́-dʑ
sıtxieşeçén»
sɨ-t-χʲɜ-ʂɜ-ʃʷɜtʃɜ́-n»
qʼɜqʼé
Ø-Ø-qʼɜ-qʼɜ́
3sABS-that-COP[.STAT.PRES] 1sABS-REL-PVB-laugh-PRES[.NFIN]» 3sABS-3sERG-say-PAST
ábıyıytʼíngiı
Ø-ɐ́-bɨjɨ-jtʼɨ-n-gʲɨ
díbrazen
Ø-Ø-dɨ́-brɐzɜ-n
«ğue
«ʁʷɜ
3sABS-the-sheep-STAT.PAST[.NFIN]-ERG-EMPH 3sABS-3sERG-CAUS-turn-CONV «you(SG)
mışüe-sresrıní
mɨɕʷɜ-ʂɜʂɨnɨ́
wípşe
wɨ́-pʃɜ
ɐduın
ɐ-dʷɨ-n
giıt
Ø-Ø-gʲɨ-t
day-every 2sPOSS-bottom the-field-OBL 3sABS-3sOBL-PVB-be.standing(SG)[.STAT.PRES]
wıgié
wɨ-gʲɜ́
wmcʼiáyın,
Ø-w-m-tɕʼ[ɜ]-ɐ́jɨ-n,
ğue
ʁʷɜ
zekié
zɜ:kʲɜ́
2sPOSS-self 3sABS-3sERG-NEG-know-ITER-CONV you(SG) once
sípşe
sɨ́-pʃɜ
déwbyeqʼeğafé
dɜ́-Ø-w-bjɜ-qʼɜ-ʁ[ɜ]:ɐfɜ́
wışueçén
wɨ-ʃʷɜtʃɜ́-n»
1sPOSS-bottom SUB-3sABS-3sERG-see-PAST[.NFIN]-becayuse 2sABS-laugh-PRES»
ınqʼeqʼé.
ɨ-Ø-n-qʼɜ-qʼɜ́.
3sABS-3sOBL-3sERG-say-PAST
Once, a sheep and a goat went into the field to go grazing. Where they went to graze, they came upon a gully, and the sheep, who was in front, jumped over it. When the sheep jumped, its tail flew up. The goat, who had been following behind it, began to laugh.
"What are you laughing for?" the sheep asked the goat. "I saw your arse, that's what I'm laughing about," said the goat. The sheep turned to the goat and said, "your arse is out in the open every day without you knowing it. And you laugh because you saw mine once."
The Northwest Caucasian languages, also called West Caucasian, Abkhazo-Adyghean, Abkhazo-Circassian, Circassic, or sometimes Pontic languages, is a family of languages spoken in the northwestern Caucasus region, chiefly in three Russian republics, the disputed territory of Abkhazia, Georgia, and Turkey, with smaller communities scattered throughout the Middle East.
The Northeast Caucasian languages, also called East Caucasian, Nakh-Daghestani or Vainakh-Daghestani, or sometimes Caspian languages, is a family of languages spoken in the Russian republics of Dagestan, Chechnya and Ingushetia and in Northern Azerbaijan as well as in Georgia and diaspora populations in Western Europe and the Middle East. According to Glottolog, there are currently 36 Nakh-Dagestanian languages.
Abkhaz, also known as Abkhazian, is a Northwest Caucasian language most closely related to Abaza. It is spoken mostly by the Abkhaz people. It is one of the official languages of Abkhazia, where around 100,000 people speak it. Furthermore, it is spoken by thousands of members of the Abkhazian diaspora in Turkey, Georgia's autonomous republic of Adjara, Syria, Jordan, and several Western countries. 27 October is the day of the Abkhazian language in Georgia.
Ubykh, an extinct Northwest Caucasian language, has the largest consonant inventory of all documented languages that do not use clicks, and also has the most disproportional ratio of phonemic consonants to vowels. It has consonants in at least eight, perhaps nine, basic places of articulation and 29 distinct fricatives, 27 sibilants, and 20 uvulars, more than any other documented language. Some Khoisan languages, such as Taa, may have larger consonant inventories due to their extensive use of click consonants, although some analyses view a large proportion of the clicks in these languages as clusters, which would bring them closer into line with the Caucasian languages.
Tevfik Esenç was a Turkish citizen of Circassian origin, known for being the last speaker of the Ubykh language. He was fluent in Ubykh, Adyghe and Turkish. After his death in 1992, the Ubykh language went extinct despite the efforts and work of numerous linguists to revive it. Nevertheless, Esenç is single-handedly responsible for the world's current knowledge of Ubykh language and culture being as extensive and detailed as it is.
Wichita is a Caddoan language spoken in Anadarko, Oklahoma by the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes. The last fluent heritage speaker, Doris Lamar-McLemore, died in 2016, although in 2007 there were three first-language speakers alive. This has rendered Wichita functionally extinct; however, the tribe offers classes to revitalize the language and works in partnership with the Wichita Documentation Project of the University of Colorado, Boulder.
The North Caucasian languages, sometimes called simply Caucasic, is a proposed language family consisting of a pair of well established language families spoken in the Caucasus, predominantly in the north, consisting of the Northwest Caucasian family and the Northeast Caucasian family. There are some 34 to 38 distinct North Caucasian languages.
The uvular ejective is a type of consonantal sound, used in some spoken languages. The symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet that represents this sound is ⟨qʼ⟩.
In linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument ("subject") of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the agent ("subject") of a transitive verb. Examples include Basque, Georgian, Mayan, Tibetan, and certain Indo-European languages. It has also been attributed to the Semitic modern Aramaic languages. Ergative languages are classified into two groups: those that are morphologically ergative but syntactically behave as accusative and those that, on top of being ergative morphologically, also show ergativity in syntax. No language has been recorded in which both the morphological and syntactical ergative are present. Languages that belong to the former group are more numerous than those to the latter. Dyirbal is said to be the only representative of syntactic ergativity, yet it displays accusative alignment with certain pronouns.
Although not used in general linguistic theory, the term preverb is used in Caucasian, Caddoan, Athabaskan, and Algonquian linguistics to describe certain elements prefixed to verbs. In the context of Indo-European languages, the term is usually used for separable verb prefixes.
The Arapaho (Arapahoe) language is one of the Plains Algonquian languages, closely related to Gros Ventre and other Arapahoan languages. It is spoken by the Arapaho of Wyoming and Oklahoma. Speakers of Arapaho primarily live on the Wind River Indian Reservation in Wyoming, though some have affiliation with the Cheyenne living in western Oklahoma.
Dameli (دَميلي), also Damia, Damɛ̃ḍī, Dāmia bāṣa or Gidoj, is an Indo-Aryan language of the Dardic subgroup spoken by approximately 5,000 people in the Domel Town, in the Chitral District of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan.
The Ojibwe language is an Algonquian North American indigenous language spoken throughout the Great Lakes region and westward onto the northern plains. It is one of the largest indigenous language north of Mexico in terms of number of speakers, and exhibits a large number of divergent dialects. For the most part, this article describes the Minnesota variety of the Southwestern dialect. The orthography used is the Fiero Double-Vowel System.
Hindustani, the lingua franca of Northern India and Pakistan, has two standardised registers: Hindi and Urdu. Grammatical differences between the two standards are minor but each uses its own script: Hindi uses Devanagari while Urdu uses an extended form of the Perso-Arabic script, typically in the Nastaʿlīq style.
The Yimas language is spoken by the Yimas people, who populate the Sepik River Basin region of Papua New Guinea. It is spoken primarily in Yimas village, Karawari Rural LLG, East Sepik Province. It is a member of the Lower-Sepik language family. All 250-300 speakers of Yimas live in two villages along the lower reaches of the Arafundi River, which stems from a tributary of the Sepik River known as the Karawari River.
Roviana is a member of the North West Solomonic branch of Oceanic languages. It is spoken around Roviana and Vonavona lagoons at the north central New Georgia in the Solomon Islands. It has 10,000 first-language speakers and an additional 16,000 people mostly over 30 years old speak it as a second language. In the past, Roviana was widely used as a trade language and further used as a lingua franca, especially for church purposes in the Western Province, but now it is being replaced by the Solomon Islands Pijin. Published studies on Roviana include: Ray (1926), Waterhouse (1949) and Todd (1978) contain the syntax of Roviana. Corston-Oliver discuss ergativity in Roviana. Todd (2000) and Ross (1988) discuss the clause structure in Roviana. Schuelke (2020) discusses grammatical relations and syntactic ergativity in Roviana.
Punjabi is an Indo-Aryan language native to the region of Punjab of Pakistan and India and spoken by the Punjabi people. This page discusses the grammar of Modern Standard Punjabi as defined by the relevant sources below.
Daakaka is a native language of Ambrym, Vanuatu. It is spoken by about one thousand speakers in the south-western corner of the island.
Eastern Circassian grammar, as described in this article, is the grammar of standard East Circassian also known as Kabardian, as spoken and written by the Kabardian and Besleney communities primarily in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and Karachay-Cherkessian Republic in Russia.
Ubykh was a polysynthetic language with a high degree of agglutination that had an ergative-absolutive alignment.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link){{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)