2022 Michigan Proposal 3

Last updated

Proposal 3
Flag of Michigan.svg
November 8, 2022

Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes2,482,38256.66%
Light brown x.svgNo1,898,90643.34%
Total votes4,381,288100.00%

2022 Michigan Proposal 3 results map by county.svg
MI Proposal 3 2022.svg
MI Proposal 3 2022 State Senate Districts.svg
2022 Michigan Proposal 3 results map by municipality.svg

2022 Michigan Proposal 3, the Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative, also known as Reproductive Freedom for All, was a citizen-initiated proposed constitutional amendment in the state of Michigan, which was voted on as part of the 2022 Michigan elections. The amendment, which passed, codified reproductive rights, including access to abortion, in the Constitution of Michigan.

Contents

Background

Following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling which overturned Roe v. Wade , access to abortion in Michigan became regulated by a 1931 law which criminalized abortion except in cases where the mother's life was at risk. The law was ruled unconstitutional by Michigan Court of Claims Judge Elizabeth L. Gleicher, characterizing the law as a violation of due process; however, the case was appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court. Regardless of the outcome of that appeal, there was no clear constitutional protection for abortion access in Michigan, making further potential regulation of abortion access by the legislature possible. [1]

The amendment was introduced to overturn the 1931 abortion ban and make the right to "reproductive freedom" explicit in the Michigan Constitution. [2] The Reproductive Freedom For All ballot committee gathered 753,759 signatures for the constitutional amendment, the most ever gathered for a ballot measure in state history, and more than enough for it to be placed on the 2022 ballot. On August 31, the Board of State Canvassers, responsible for determining whether candidates and initiatives should be placed on the ballot, deadlocked 2–2, with challengers arguing that the initiative's wording was poorly-spaced. On September 9, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that the initiative should be placed on the November ballot. [3]

Contents

The proposal appeared on the ballot as follows: [4]

A proposal to amend the state constitution to establish new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make all decisions about pregnancy and abortion; allow state to regulate abortion in some cases; and forbid prosecution of individuals exercising established right

This proposed constitutional amendment would:

Should this proposal be adopted?

Restrictions on reproductive rights must be implemented in the "least restrictive means", and with a "compelling" interest. [5] [6]

The full text of the section that the proposal added to Article I of the state constitution is as follows: [7]

Sec. 28. (1) Every individual has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make and effectuate decisions about all matters relating to pregnancy, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion care, miscarriage management, and infertility care.
An individual’s right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied, burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means.
Notwithstanding the above, the state may regulate the provision of abortion care after fetal viability, provided that in no circumstance shall the state prohibit an abortion that, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional, is medically indicated to protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.
(2) The state shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.
(3) The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes, including but not limited to miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or assisting a pregnant individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with their voluntary consent.
(4) For the purposes of this section:
A state interest is “compelling” only if it is for the limited purpose of protecting the health of an individual seeking care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and evidence-based medicine, and does not infringe on that individual’s autonomous decision-making. “Fetal viability” means: the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional and based on the particular facts of the case, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’s sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of extraordinary medical measures.
(5) This section shall be self-executing. Any provision of this section held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section.

Arguments

Proponents of Proposal 3

The proposal's main supporters, Reproductive Freedom for All, state that Proposal 3 would "ensure that all Michiganders have the right to safe and respectful care during birthing, everyone has the right to use temporary or permanent birth control, everyone has the right to continue or end a pregnancy pre-viability, and no one can be punished for having a miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion." [8]

Opponents of Proposal 3

The proposal's main opponents, Citizens to Support MI Women and Children, have called Proposal 3 "extreme", arguing that it could invalidate 41 state laws related to abortion and other issues (including prostitution, statutory rape, and human cloning). [9] [6] [10] They have argued that due to the right to reproductive freedom applying to "all individuals", that it would repeal the requirement for minors to receive parental consent in order to receive an abortion. The group also asserted that the proposal would allow any "attending health care professional" to perform an abortion (a definition under state law that includes athletic trainers and masseuses), and repeal safety standards and inspections of abortion clinics. [5] [6] University of Detroit Mercy associate law professor Michelle Richards argued that such issues could still be regulated under Proposal 3, as a compelling interest to protect the safety and welfare of residents. [6]

Opponents of Proposal 3 claimed that the amendment would codify an "unlimited right to abortion" by allowing abortions up to the last week of pregnancy for any reason. [11] [12]

It was also argued by opponents that Proposal 3 would allow minors to receive puberty blockers, castration, or a hysterectomy without parental consent, under an interpretation of the proposal that classified these procedures as falling under "infertility" and "sterilization". [5] [6] Washtenaw County Prosecuting Attorney Eli Savit and University of Michigan constitutional law professor Leah Litman disputed the claim, citing that Proposal 3 specifically defines the right to "reproductive freedom" as being within the context of pregnancy, with no explicit references to other contexts such as transgender health care. [13] [5] The Michigan Supreme Court will have to rule on the precise effects of the amendment.

Fundraising

Reproductive Freedom for All has received $44 million, mostly from groups such as the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and NARAL and Sam Bankman-Fried. [14] [15] Meanwhile, the Citizens to Support MI Women and Children has raised almost $17 million from groups such as the Michigan Catholic Conference and Right to Life of Michigan. Both committees have spent millions of dollars on advertising, including on TV and digital ads. [16] [17] [15]

Polling

Opinion polls for the first few months before the referendum indicated significant majority support for the amendment. Its popularity waned from the initial summer backlash from the Dobbs decision, but nonetheless, the amendment had a clear lead in the polls throughout the campaign. [18]

Graphical summary
Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [lower-alpha 1]
Margin
of error
For
Proposal 3
Against
Proposal 3
Undecided [lower-alpha 2] Lead
Cygnal (R) November 1–4, 20221,603 (LV)± 2.5%52%44%5%8%
Mitchell Research November 3, 2022658 (LV)± 3.8%51%46%3% [lower-alpha 3] 5%
Cygnal (R) October 31 – November 2, 20221,754 (LV)± 2.3%52%43%5%9%
EPIC-MRA [lower-alpha 4] October 28 November 1, 2022600 (LV)± 4.0%57%40%4%17%
Emerson College October 28–31, 2022900 (LV)± 3.2%51%42%7%9%
The Glengariff Group, Inc. [lower-alpha 5] October 26–28, 2022600 (LV)± 4.0%55%41%4%14%
Mitchell Research October 19, 2022541 (LV)± 4.2%50%47%3% [lower-alpha 3] 3%
CNN/SSRS October 13–18, 2022901 (RV)± 4.2%54%45%1% [lower-alpha 6] 9%
651 (LV)± 4.9%54%45%2% [lower-alpha 7] 9%
Emerson College October 12–14, 2022580 (LV)± 4.0%52%38%10%14%
EPIC-MRA October 6–12, 2022600 (LV)± 4.0%60%33%7%27%
CBS News/YouGov October 3–6, 20221,285 (RV) [lower-alpha 8] ± 3.6%54%38%7% [lower-alpha 9] 16%
The Glengariff Group, Inc. [lower-alpha 5] September 26–29, 2022600 (LV)± 4.0%62%24%14%38%
EPIC-MRA [lower-alpha 4] September 15–19, 2022600 (LV)± 4.0%64%27%9%37%
EPIC-MRA Archived October 1, 2022, at the Wayback Machine September 7–13, 2022800 (LV)± 3.5%56%23%21%33%
EPIC-MRA August 18–23, 2022600 (LV)± 4.0%67%24%9%43%

Results

Proposal 3 was approved with 56.66% of the vote. [21] One factor in the proposal's passage was the increased participation in the midterm election by younger voters. [22]

Proposal 3 [21]
ChoiceVotes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes2,482,38256.66
No1,898,90643.34
Total votes4,381,288100.00

Results by congressional district are shown below.

Congressional districtYesNoTotal VotesRepresentative
#%#%#Name
District 1 190,67849.2%197,13350.8%387,811 Jack Bergman
District 2 153,02944.6%189,91155.4%342,940 John Moolenaar
District 3 188,64455.8%149,56244.2%338,206 Hillary Scholten
District 4 174,56451.5%164,31248.5%338,876 Bill Huizenga
District 5 146,01446.3%169,42853.7%315,442 Tim Walberg
District 6 254,03668.5%116,85531.5%370,891 Debbie Dingell
District 7 212,55457.4%157,86742.6%370,421 Elissa Slotkin
District 8 186,89956.2%145,54643.8%332,445 Dan Kildee
District 9 177,81446.9%201,01253.1%378,826 Lisa McClain
District 10 185,34957.6%136,30542.4%321,654 John James
District 11 246,41366.9%121,64433.1%368,057 Haley Stevens
District 12 197,19871.1%80,18128.9%277,379 Rashida Tlaib
District 13 170,94372.1%66,15527.9%237,098 Shri Thanedar
Totals2,482,38256.7%1,898,90643.3%4,381,2887D, 6R
Source: Google Sheets

In the wake of the constitutional amendment's approval, the 1931 abortion law was repealed on April 5, 2023. [23] The Reproductive Health Act, which repealed several abortion restrictions, was enacted on November 21, 2023. [24] [25] The act also repealed a Republican-passed 10-year-old law requiring a separate health insurance add-on for abortion coverage that critics called 'rape insurance'. [26]

Recount

The America Project, a Donald Trump-aligned organization, funded a partial recount of this proposal as well as 2022 Michigan Proposal 2 despite their passage by wide margins. The recount was spearheaded by Jerome Jay Allen of the conservative group Election Integrity Fund and Force. The recount lasted two weeks and added 116 yes votes and 7 no votes to the totals. This led to calls to tighten recount rules to disallow frivolous recounts with no chance of changing the vote outcome. [27]

See also

Notes

  1. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  2. Some polling results do not add up to 100% due to rounding.
  3. 1 2 "Don’t plan on voting on the proposal" with 3%
  4. 1 2 Commissioned by the Detroit Free Press [19] [20]
  5. 1 2 Commissioned by WDIV-TV and The Detroit News
  6. "No opinion" with 1%
  7. "No opinion" with 2%
  8. Poll conducted among 1,285 registered voters, question results from a subset of likely voters.
  9. "Won’t vote on this proposal" with 7%

Related Research Articles

Abortion in Ireland is regulated by the Health Act 2018. Abortion is permitted in Ireland during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy, and later in cases where the pregnant woman's life or health is at risk, or in the cases of a fatal foetal abnormality. Abortion services commenced on 1 January 2019, following its legalisation by the aforementioned Act, which became law on 20 December 2018. Previously, the 8th Constitutional Amendment had given the life of the unborn foetus the same value as that of its mother, but the 36th constitutional amendment, approved by referendum in May 2018, replaced this with a clause permitting the Oireachtas (parliament) to legislate for the termination of pregnancies.

<i>In re Article 26 and the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Bill 1995</i>

In re Article 26 and the Regulation of Information Bill 1995 [1995] 1 IR 1 was a decision of the Supreme Court of Ireland after a referral by President Mary Robinson under Article 26 of the Constitution of Ireland. This is a procedure whereby the constitutionality of a bill is considered by the Supreme Court before it is signed into law, similar to the concept of a facial challenge in the United States. If the Court finds that it is constitutional, it may not later be challenged after its enactment.

The Twenty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2001 was a proposed amendment to the Constitution of Ireland to tighten the constitutional ban on abortion. It would have removed the threat of suicide as a grounds for legal abortion in the state, as well as introducing new penalties for anyone performing an abortion, by giving constitutional status to legislation proposed to be enacted after the amendment. It was narrowly rejected in a referendum held on 6 March 2002, with 50.4% against.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law in the United States by state</span> Termination of pregnancy in states of the United States

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions, others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while others allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fairness Project</span> Charitable organization in the U.S.

The Fairness Project is a United States 501(c)(4) charitable organization created in October 2015. They promote general economic and social justice throughout the US by the use of ballot measures to circumvent deadlocks in law changes by the legislative and executive branches of government. They act as a national body by supporting state organizations and campaigns with targeted funding rather than by direct campaigning. They support the gathering of signatures to meet the variable requirements to trigger ballots in states and then aid the campaigns with early financial backing, strategic advice, and various campaign tools.

Abortion in Michigan is legal throughout all stages of pregnancy. A state constitutional amendment to explicitly guarantee abortion rights was placed on the ballot in 2022 as Michigan Proposal 22–3; it passed with 57 percent of the vote, adding the right to abortion and contraceptive use to the Michigan Constitution. The amendment largely prevents the regulation of abortion before fetal viability, unless said regulations are to protect the individual seeking an abortion, and it also makes it unconstitutional to make laws restricting abortions which would protect the life and health, physical and/or mental, of the pregnant individual seeking abortion.

Abortion in Ohio is legal on request up to the point of fetal viability. After viability, abortion is legal if, in the professional judgement of an attending physician, the abortion is necessary to protect the pregnant individual’s life or health.

Abortion in California is legal up to the point of fetal viability. An abortion ban was in place by 1900, and by 1950, it was a criminal offense for a woman to have an abortion. In 1962, the American Law Institute published their model penal code, as it applied to abortions, with three circumstances where they believed a physician could justifiably perform an abortion, and California adopted a version of this code. In 2002, California passed a law guaranteeing women the right to have an abortion "prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman". In 2022, California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 1, which amended the Constitution of California to explicitly protect the right to abortion and contraception by a margin of 33.76%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 California elections</span>

The 2022 California elections took place on November 8, 2022. The statewide direct primary election was held on June 7, 2022.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. The court's decision overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), returning to individual states the power to regulate any aspect of abortion not protected by federal statutory law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Michigan elections</span>

The 2022 Michigan elections were held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 throughout Michigan. The Democratic Party made historic gains, taking full control of state government for the first time since 1983. Democrats won control of the Michigan House of Representatives for the first time since 2008, and the Michigan Senate for the first time since 1984. Additionally, incumbent Democratic governor Gretchen Whitmer won reelection by a comfortable margin, with Democrats sweeping every statewide office. Furthermore, the Democrats maintained control of seven seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, while the Republican Party took a net loss of one seat. The elections in Michigan were widely characterized as a "blue wave".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Kansas abortion referendum</span> Abortion ballot measure

The 2022 Kansas abortion referendum was a rejected legislatively referred constitutional amendment to the Kansas Constitution that appeared on the ballot on August 2, 2022, alongside primary elections for statewide offices, with early voting from July 13. If enacted, the amendment would have declared that the Kansas Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion, given the Kansas state government power to prosecute individuals involved in abortions, and further declared that the Kansas government is not required to fund abortions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 California Proposition 1</span> Abortion and contraception proposition

Proposition 1, titled Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom and initially known as Senate Constitutional Amendment 10 (SCA 10), was a California ballot proposition and state constitutional amendment that was voted on in the 2022 general election on November 8. Passing with more than two-thirds of the vote, the proposition amended the Constitution of California to explicitly grant the right to an abortion and contraceptives, making California among the first states in the nation to codify the right. The decision to propose the codification of abortion rights in the state constitution was precipitated in May 2022 by Politico's publishing of a leaked draft opinion showing the United States Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The decision reversed judicial precedent that previously held that the United States constitution protected the right to an abortion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Michigan Proposal 2</span>

2022 Michigan Proposal 2, the Right to Voting Policies Amendment, and also known as Promote the Vote, was a citizen-initiated proposed constitutional amendment in the state of Michigan, which was voted on as part of the 2022 Michigan elections. The amendment changed voting procedures in the state with the goal of making it easier to vote.

The following is a list of ballot measures which were on the ballot for the 2022 United States elections. Some were held prior to the federal elections on November 8. Many were initiated by state legislatures, while others were initiated by public petitions.

The following is a list of ballot measures, whether initiated by legislators or citizens, which have been certified to appear on various states' ballots during the 2024 United States elections as of 17 December 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 2023 Ohio Issue 1</span> 2023 ballot initiative

The 2023 Ohio reproductive rights initiative, officially titled "The Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and Safety", and listed on the ballot as Issue 1, was a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment that was adopted on November 7, 2023, by a majority of 56.8% of voters. It codified reproductive rights in the Ohio Constitution, including contraception, fertility treatment, whether to continue one's own pregnancy, and miscarriage care, restoring Roe v. Wade-era access in Ohio and protecting "the right to abortion up to the point of fetal viability" while permitting restrictions after.

The Tennessee Constitutional Amendment: 1, commonly known as Amendment 1 or the No State Constitutional Right to Abortion and Legislative Power to Regulate Abortion Amendment, is an approved legislatively referred constitutional amendment to the Constitution of Tennessee that appeared on the ballot on November 4, 2014. The amendment would ensure that Constitution of Tennessee, would not support, fund, or protect the right to an abortion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 Maryland abortion referendum</span> 2024 ballot initiative

The 2024 Maryland abortion referendum is a voter referendum to amend the Constitution of Maryland in order to codify the right to reproductive care in Maryland.

References

  1. Boucher, Dave (September 7, 2022). "Michigan judge rules 1931 law criminalizing most abortions is unconstitutional". Detroit Free Press . Archived from the original on October 4, 2022. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  2. Mulka, Angela (October 27, 2022). "What Proposal 3 would do: Abortion on the ballot in Michigan". Midland Daily News . Archived from the original on October 31, 2022. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  3. Yu, Yue Stella (September 14, 2022). "2022 Michigan ballot issues tracker: What to know about election proposals". Bridge Michigan . Lansing. Archived from the original on October 4, 2022. Retrieved October 4, 2022.
  4. "Proposal 22-3" (PDF). Michigan Bureau of Elections. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 22, 2022. Retrieved October 22, 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "To Stop An Abortion-Rights Amendment, Conservatives Are Attacking LGBTQ Rights". HuffPost. October 21, 2022. Retrieved October 29, 2022.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 "Michigan Proposal 3 fact check: No, masseuses won't give abortions to minors". Bridge Michigan . Retrieved October 29, 2022.
  7. "Ballot Proposal 3 of 2022 (Michigan)" (PDF). Michigan State House of Representatives. Retrieved February 1, 2023.
  8. Haddad, Ken (June 29, 2022). "Michigan abortion ballot drive nears signature goal in final push for Nov. election". WDIV. Retrieved October 29, 2022.
  9. Fowler, Megan (October 28, 2022). "Five States to Vote on Abortion Rights This Election Day". Christianity Today. Retrieved October 29, 2022.
  10. "Constitutional Amendment Summary". Citizens to Support MI Women & Children. Retrieved October 29, 2022.
  11. "Michigan Is Sleepwalking toward Abortion Extremism". National Review. October 9, 2022. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
  12. "Former Dem Congresswoman Warns Michigan's Abortion Referendum Would Allow 'Infanticide'". National Review. November 7, 2022. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
  13. Boucher, Clara Hendrickson and Dave. "Michigan's abortion amendment: Here's what it will and won't do if approved". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved October 29, 2022.
  14. "SBF |A new indictment shows how Sam Bankman-Fried's political influence worked" . Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  15. 1 2 "Statement Details | Michigan Campaign Finance Committee Search". cfrsearch.nictusa.com. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  16. Ollstein, Alice Miranda (October 31, 2022). "Michigan abortion-rights battle rakes in cash ahead of referendum". POLITICO. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  17. "Statement Details | Michigan Campaign Finance Committee Search". cfrsearch.nictusa.com. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  18. Orner, Ben (October 28, 2022). "Prop 3 fight eclipses $50 million: 'Yes' outraising 'No' and polling ahead". MLive.com . Archived from the original on November 2, 2022. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  19. Hendrickson, Clara (September 22, 2022). "Michigan abortion proposal has strong support, poll shows" . Detroit Free Press . Archived from the original on October 21, 2022. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  20. Hendrickson, Clara (November 5, 2022). "Where support for Michigan ballot proposals stands before Nov. 8 election" . Detroit Free Press . Archived from the original on November 5, 2022. Retrieved November 6, 2022.
  21. 1 2 "2022 Michigan Election Results - General". Michigan Secretary of State. November 28, 2022. Archived from the original on November 29, 2022. Retrieved November 29, 2022.
  22. "Michigan's youngest voters made biggest gains in midterm voter turnout".
  23. "Governor Whitmer Repeals Michigans Extreme 1931 Abortion Ban".
  24. "Whitmer signs Michigan 'Reproductive Health Act,' repeals abortion restrictions".
  25. "How Michigan did, and didn't, change abortion laws in 2023". November 24, 2023.
  26. "Michigan removes 'rape insurance' abortion coverage requirement". December 11, 2023.
  27. Brand-Williams, Oralandar (December 21, 2022). "Two-week recount of Proposals 2, 3 ends quietly, changes little in Michigan". Bridge Michigan . Retrieved December 23, 2022.