Cultural contracts

Last updated

Cultural contracts refer to the degree that cultural values are exchanged between groups. [1] They are the agreements made between two groups of people regarding how they will modify their identities in unison. [2] Cultural contract theory investigates how identities shift and are negotiated through cross-cultural interaction. [2] It extends identity negotiation theory and uncertainty reduction theory by focusing defining the negotiation experience from the perspective of minority groups when dealing with cultural norms set by the majority groups. Relationally coordinating with others is the main objective of a cultural contract. [3] The three fundamental premises of the cultural contracts theory are that identities are contractual, continually transferred, and requirement for validation. [3]

Contents

Cultural contracts theory was developed in 1999 [4] by Dr. Ronald L. Jackson, an identity scholar and a professor in media and cinema studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.

Background

Cultural contracts first appeared in Communication Quarterly in 1999. Dr. Ronald L. Jackson came up with the original idea while negotiating a deal for a new house. [3] He was fascinated by the general outline of a contract and was interested in identity as a communication researcher, so the process struck a chord with him and made him think about how cultural diversity functions in our society. [3]

The theory is inspired by Ting-Toomey's (1986) identity validation model (IDM) that emerged from a study of European American and African American communication experiences. [5] Both theories are rooted in the exchanges between strangers as described in Berger and Calabrese's (1975) uncertainty reduction theory. [6] Cultural contracts focuses specifically on the exchanges between traditionally marginalized groups and majority groups in power in American society from the standpoint of the minority member.

The theory is not limited to oral communication, and also include nonverbal communications such as clothing, hairstyle, and other items. [3] Any value that makes up an individual's worldview, including behavior and other cultural norms, can be negotiated and subjected to a cultural contract. For humans, culture is a fundamental and essential component. Cultural contracts are required for people to protect and define their identity. [2] Contracts can be long-lasting (like when individuals of marginalized groups want to fit in with American society. [3] ) or transient(similar to how someone might speak in a more professional tone when trying to impress others [3] ). People can simultaneously negotiate several identities when engaging in interactions. [2] In other words, it is conceivable for one individual to have multiple cultural contracts with various parties for various objectives. [3] In the negotiation, power is a key factor. [2] The group with less power must choose whether or not to enter into a contract with the dominant group. [2]

Contract violations have three possible outcomes: ending the relationship, renegotiating the contract, or nothing if the harm is slight or the relationship is crucial. [2]

Types of contracts

Cultural contract types
Ready-to-Sign
Quasi-Complete
Co-Created

Cultural contracts suggests that mainstream and marginalized identities are in natural conflict. In order to achieve communication, individuals must decide how much of their values will be negotiated. This results in one of three contracts by the minority identity: ready-to-sign contracts (assimilating to mainstream values); quasi-completed contracts (adapting marginalized values to accommodate mainstream values); and co-created contracts (validating both mainstream and marginalized values). [7] Most individuals are not aware that they create or sign cultural contracts. Each contract is a "result of how identities have been personally and socially constructed and exposed." [8]

Ready-to-sign contract

The first contract is a ready-to-sign contract, or assimilation, which occurs when individuals replace their culture identity for the dominant culture. This contract can be temporary or long-term and benefits the majority. There is no room for negotiating marginalized identity with mainstream ideals in this contract with no perceived benefit to the marginalized group. The signing of contract is driven by the desire to maintain an artificial harmony or to accomplish specific goals. [9]

Ready-to-sign contracts are typically the product of power and culture loyalty. [2] In any given society, those in positions of power frequently keep ready-to-sign contracts. [3] "Dominant group members' fears" can cause the majority group to hold ready-to-sign cultural contracts about the minority group with little room for negotiation. [10] Resisting assimilation can be dangerous and frequently tiring for the minority groups. [11] They not only manage the numerous challenges and strains that the majority group may confront, but also the cultural isolation that results from being cut off from the community. [11]

Quasi-completed contracts

Quasi-completed contracts (adaptation) result in temporarily incorporating a small part of an individual's value to the mainstream value, and vice versa. This is usually a short-term contract since neither identity is dominant in this interaction. Quasi-completed contracts are created to strike a balance between upholding current identities and attempting to connect with other communities. [2] Avoiding conflicts, developing cultural pride, or raising cultural awareness are the driving forces behind it. [9]

Co-created contracts

Lastly, co-created contracts (mutual validation) result in blending values together. Cultural differences are acknowledged and valued in this contract. [12] In certain instance, values are deeply penetrated and are not up for exchange. Others are more surface and the perceived benefits of the contract do not conflict with our core identity. This will determine if an individual is willing to sign a cultural contract or remain in conflict. [1]

The signing of contract is driven by actually coming to esteem the other individual, demonstrating one's allyship, or fending off marginalization. [9] The contracts can be signed one or two ways: the signee perceives a benefit in accommodating or assimilating, or the signee is forced to accommodate or assimilate. Members of marginalized groups are more likely to look for co-created cultural contracts. [3] Co-created contracts are also desired by those who identify as multicultural. [3] This promotes the release of emotional, interpersonal, psychological, and personal burden while enabling the highest level of trust and openness. [3]

The transformation among different types of contracts

During the COVID-19 pandemic, disabled students changed how they negotiated their identities in the classrooms. Researchers found that some instructors relaxed strict standards of what constitutes "perfect" student engagement, substituting ready-to-sign contracts for quasi-complete and co-created ones. [13] This was motivated by the uncertainty of pandemic life. [13] However, the researchers also voice concerns about teachers reverting to the earlier expectations once the pre-COVID classroom settings resume. [13]

A 2015 study that focused on the Ice Bucket Challenge discovered that if one party in the identity negotiation wants to end the relationship, there can be a shift from a quasi-completed contract to a ready-to-sign contract, where this party changed from being open to discussion to taking control and making decisions that cannot be challenged. [14] But for the time being, neither party's choice will be influenced by popular opinion. [14]

Applications

In identity studies

A transient must renegotiate both "culture contract" and reintegration into country of origin. [15] Cultural contracts are traded and implicitly controlled during the multiple reentry process. [15] A period of absence from home may necessitate some adjusting to changes because values, attitudes, norms, communication patterns, and perspectives on the world are subject to change with time. [15] The "signing" of a cultural contract occurs when any one or all of these dimensions of identity change. [15]

In rhetoric studies

Everyday rhetorical transmission, public property, historical context, and social ties are all characteristics of culture. [9] Every negotiation is a rhetorical one because people are actually negotiating to keep access to a cultural collective or rhetorical community rather than giving that access away. [9] In order to understand how communicators' identities are impacted by typical rhetorical transactions, paradigms like the cultural contracts theory need to be developed. [9] For investigating how relationships and identities are created, managed, rejected, or terminated, as well as how this process occurs rhetorically, the paradigm of cultural contracts is also helpful. [9]

In racial and gender studies

Cultural contracts theory has been used in higher education scholarship to explore the relationships between White students and African American faculty. [8] [16] [17] The theory has also been used to explore the contracts African American women sign in their beauty and hair choices. [18]

The notion of cultural contracts has provided an effective framework for investigating how biracial young adults position themselves within current U.S. conceptions of race. [19] In part, study participants described how traditional racial categorizations affected how they developed their sense of identity. [19] Most multiracial women renegotiate their identities through quasi-completed cultural contracts. [19] Although some of the multiracial women were successful in fostering co-created cultural contracts, doing so seems to be an ongoing challenge. [19] The multiracial women who managed co-created contracts in their daily lives appeared to be particularly concerned with bucking "mainstream thinking," which manifested itself in a variety of ready-to-sign cultural contracts. [19]

In the classroom

A study discovered that parents from different racial origins have diverse ideas on what constitutes a good education and how important education is. [20] Interracial couples have the advantage of diverse viewpoints and exhibit a willingness to have quasi-completed and co-created cultural contracts with their spouses when negotiating the educational options for their children. [20]

In the hospital

The theory is applied to research how Saudi nurses negotiate their identities at work. The hospital administration disregarded the female nurses demands and rigidly insisted that the nurses perform their responsibilities without exceptions even after they protested to delivering duties involving male genitalia. [21] In this phase, the nurses had ready-to-sign contracts with the administration. [21] However, the nurses fought the administration's directives on several levels and signed the quasi-complete contracts. [21] Some nurses signed the co-created contracts when they do not think that their work violate their values and norms as Saudi women. [21] For example, a nurse had appealed to the importance of assistance which is one of the basic Islamic teachings. [21]

Related Research Articles

Queer theory is a field of post-structuralist critical theory that emerged in the early 1990s out of queer studies and women's studies. The term "queer theory" can have various meanings depending upon its usage, but has been broadly associated with the study and theorization of gender and sexual practices that exist outside of heterosexuality, and which challenge the notion that heterosexual desire is "normal". Following social constructivist developments in sociology, queer theorists are often critical of what they consider essentialist views of sexuality and gender. Instead, they study those concepts as social and cultural phenomena, often through an analysis of the categories, binaries, and language in which they are said to be portrayed.

Acculturation is a process of social, psychological, and cultural change that stems from the balancing of two cultures while adapting to the prevailing culture of the society. Acculturation is a process in which an individual adopts, acquires and adjusts to a new cultural environment as a result of being placed into a new culture, or when another culture is brought to someone. Individuals of a differing culture try to incorporate themselves into the new more prevalent culture by participating in aspects of the more prevalent culture, such as their traditions, but still hold onto their original cultural values and traditions. The effects of acculturation can be seen at multiple levels in both the devotee of the prevailing culture and those who are assimilating into the culture.

Alternative media are media sources that differ from established or dominant types of media in terms of their content, production, or distribution. Sometimes the term independent media is used as a synonym, indicating independence from large media corporations, but generally independent media is used to describe a different meaning around freedom of the press and independence from government control. Alternative media does not refer to a specific format and may be inclusive of print, audio, film/video, online/digital and street art, among others. Some examples include the counter-culture zines of the 1960s, ethnic and indigenous media such as the First People's television network in Canada, and more recently online open publishing journalism sites such as Indymedia.

Intercultural communication is a discipline that studies communication across different cultures and social groups, or how culture affects communication. It describes the wide range of communication processes and problems that naturally appear within an organization or social context made up of individuals from different religious, social, ethnic, and educational backgrounds. In this sense, it seeks to understand how people from different countries and cultures act, communicate, and perceive the world around them. Intercultural communication focuses on the recognition and respect of those with cultural differences. The goal is mutual adaptation between two or more distinct cultures which leads to biculturalism/multiculturalism rather than complete assimilation. It promotes the development of cultural sensitivity and allows for empathic understanding across different cultures.

Identity is the set of qualities, beliefs, personality traits, appearance, and/or expressions that characterize a person or a group.

Standpoint theory, also known as standpoint epistemology, is a foundational framework in social theory that examines how individuals' unique perspectives, shaped by their social and political experiences, influence their understanding of the world. Standpoint theory proposes that authority is rooted in individuals' personal knowledge and perspectives and the power that such authority exerts.

Muted Group Theory (MGT) is a communication theory developed by cultural anthropologist Edwin Ardener and feminist scholar Shirley Ardener in 1975, that exposes the sociolinguistic power imbalances that can suppress social groups' voices.

Symbolic convergence theory (SCT) is a communication theory developed by Ernest Bormann proposing that the holding of fantasies in common transforms collections of individuals into cohesive groups. SCT offers an explanation for the appearance of a group's cohesiveness, consisting of shared emotions, motives, and meanings. Through SCT, individuals can build a community or a group consciousness which grows stronger if they share a cluster of fantasy themes. Symbolic convergence theory provides a description of the dynamic tendencies within systems of social interaction that cause communicative practices and forms to evolve. This theory allows theorists and practitioners to anticipate or predict what will happen and explain what did happen. One thing SCT does not do is allow for control of human communication. It attempts to explain how communication can create and sustain group consciousness through the sharing of narratives or fantasies.

Feminist theory in composition studies examines how gender, language, and cultural studies affect the teaching and practice of writing. It challenges the traditional assumptions and methods of composition studies and proposes alternative approaches that are informed by feminist perspectives. Feminist theory in composition studies covers a range of topics, such as the history and development of women’s writing, the role of gender in rhetorical situations, the representation and identity of writers, and the pedagogical implications of feminist theory for writing instruction. Feminist theory in composition studies also explores how writing can be used as a tool for empowerment, resistance, and social change. Feminist theory in composition studies emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a response to the male-dominated field of composition and rhetoric. It has been influenced by various feminist movements and disciplines, such as second-wave feminism, poststructuralism, psychoanalysis, critical race theory, and queer theory. Feminist theory in composition studies has contributed to the revision of traditional rhetorical concepts, the recognition of diverse voices and genres, the promotion of collaborative and ethical communication, and the integration of personal and political issues in writing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Face negotiation theory</span> Theory in social science

Face negotiation theory is a theory conceived by Stella Ting-Toomey in 1985, to understand how people from different cultures manage rapport and disagreements. The theory posited "face", or self-image when communicating with others, as a universal phenomenon that pervades across cultures. In conflicts, one's face is threatened; and thus the person tends to save or restore his or her face. This set of communicative behaviors, according to the theory, is called "facework". Since people frame the situated meaning of "face" and enact "facework" differently from one culture to the next, the theory poses a cross-cultural framework to examine facework negotiation. It is important to note that the definition of face varies depending on the people and their culture and the same can be said for the proficiency of facework. According to Ting-Toomey's theory, most cultural differences can be divided by Eastern and Western cultures, and her theory accounts for these differences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultural sensitivity</span> Knowledge, awareness, and acceptance of other cultures

Cultural sensitivity, also referred to as cross-cultural sensitivity or cultural awareness, is the knowledge, awareness, and acceptance of other cultures and others' cultural identities. It is related to cultural competence, and is sometimes regarded as the precursor to the achievement of cultural competence, but is a more commonly used term. On the individual level, cultural sensitivity is a state of mind regarding interactions with those different from oneself. Cultural sensitivity enables travelers, workers, and others to successfully navigate interactions with a culture other than their own.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Identity management theory</span>

Identity management theory is an intercultural communication theory from the 1990s. It was developed by William R. Cupach and Tadasu Todd Imahori on the basis of Erving Goffman's Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (1967). Cupach and Imahori distinguish between intercultural communication and intracultural communication.

Co-cultural communication theory was built upon the frameworks of muted group theory and standpoint theory. The cornerstone of co-cultural communication theory is muted group theory as proposed in the mid 1970s by Shirley and Edwin Ardener. The Ardeners were cultural anthropologists who made the observation that most other cultural anthropologists practicing ethnography in the field were talking only to the leaders of the cultures, who were by and large adult males. The researchers would then use this data to represent the culture as a whole, leaving out the perspectives of women, children and other groups made voiceless by the cultural hierarchy. The Ardeners maintained that groups which function at the top of the society hierarchy determine to a great extent the dominant communication system of the entire society. Ardener's 1975 muted group theory also posited that dominant group members formulate a "communication system that support their perception of the world and conceptualized it as the appropriate language for the rest of society".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interpersonal communication</span> Exchange of information among people

Interpersonal communication is an exchange of information between two or more people. It is also an area of research that seeks to understand how humans use verbal and nonverbal cues to accomplish several personal and relational goals. Communication includes utilizing communication skills within one's surroundings, including physical and psychological spaces. It is essential to see the visual/nonverbal and verbal cues regarding the physical spaces. In the psychological spaces, self-awareness and awareness of the emotions, cultures, and things that are not seen are also significant when communicating.

Individualistic cultures are characterized by individualism, which is the prioritization or emphasis of the individual over the entire group. In individualistic cultures people are motivated by their own preference and viewpoints. Individualistic cultures focus on abstract thinking, privacy, self-dependence, uniqueness, and personal goals. The term individualistic culture was first used in the 1980s by Dutch social psychologist Geert Hofstede to describe countries and cultures that are not collectivist, Hofstede created the term individualistic culture when he created a measurement for the five dimensions of cultural values.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Holistic nursing</span> Medical care practice

Holistic nursing is a way of treating and taking care of the patient as a whole body, which involves physical, social, environmental, psychological, cultural and religious factors. There are many theories that support the importance of nurses approaching the patient holistically and education on this is there to support the goal of holistic nursing. The important skill to be used in holistic nursing would be communicating skills with patients and other practitioners. This emphasizes that patients being treated would be treated not only in their body but also their mind and spirit.. Holistic nursing is a nursing speciality concerning the integration of one's mind, body, and spirit with his or her environment. This speciality has a theoretical basis in a few grand nursing theories, most notably the science of unitary human beings, as published by Martha E. Rogers in An Introduction to the Theoretical Basis of Nursing, and the mid-range theory Empowered Holistic Nursing Education, as published by Dr. Katie Love. Holistic nursing has gained recognition by the American Nurses Association (ANA) as a nursing specialty with a defined scope of practice and standards. Holistic nursing focuses on the mind, body, and spirit working together as a whole and how spiritual awareness in nursing can help heal illness. Holistic medicine focuses on maintaining optimum well-being and preventing rather than just treating disease.

Ronald L. Jackson II is an American academic and author. He is Past President of the National Communication Association and a professor of communication, culture, and media, and a former dean of the McMicken College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Cincinnati.

African American Communication: Exploring Identity and Culture is a 2003 book by Michael Hecht, Ronald L. Jackson II and Sidney A. Ribeau.

Karen A. Foss is a rhetorical scholar and educator in the discipline of communication. Her research and teaching interests include contemporary rhetorical theory and criticism, feminist perspectives on communication, the incorporation of marginalized voices into rhetorical theory and practice, and the reconceptualization of communication theories and constructs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminist rhetoric</span> Practice of rhetoric

Feminist rhetoric emphasizes the narratives of all demographics, including women and other marginalized groups, into the consideration or practice of rhetoric. Feminist rhetoric does not focus exclusively on the rhetoric of women or feminists, but instead prioritizes the feminist principles of inclusivity, community, and equality over the classic, patriarchal model of persuasion that ultimately separates people from their own experience. Seen as the act of producing or the study of feminist discourses, feminist rhetoric emphasizes and supports the lived experiences and histories of all human beings in all manner of experiences. It also redefines traditional delivery sites to include non-traditional locations such as demonstrations, letter writing, and digital processes, and alternative practices such as rhetorical listening and productive silence. According to author and rhetorical feminist Cheryl Glenn in her book Rhetorical Feminism and This Thing Called Hope (2018), "rhetorical feminism is a set of tactics that multiplies rhetorical opportunities in terms of who counts as a rhetor, who can inhabit an audience, and what those audiences can do." Rhetorical feminism is a strategy that counters traditional forms of rhetoric, favoring dialogue over monologue and seeking to redefine the way audiences view rhetorical appeals.

References

  1. 1 2 Jackson, Ronald L. (June 2002). "Cultural contracts theory: Toward an understanding of identity negotiation". Communication Quarterly. 50 (3–4): 359–367. doi:10.1080/01463370209385672. S2CID   143619365.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Littlejohn, Stephen W.; Foss, Karen A.; Oetzel, John G. (2016). Theories of Human Communication. Waveland Press. ISBN   978-1-4786-3477-5.[ page needed ]
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Jackson, Ronald L. (2015). "Cultural Contracts Theory". In Bennett, Janet M. (ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence. doi:10.4135/9781483346267.n60. ISBN   978-1-4522-4428-0.
  4. Jackson, R. L. (1999). The Negotiation of Cultural Identity. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.[ page needed ]
  5. Ting-Toomey, Stella (1986). "Conflict communication styles in black and white subjective cultures". In Kim, Young Yun (ed.). Interethnic Communication: Current Research. SAGE Publications. pp. 75–88. ISBN   978-0-8039-2836-7. OCLC   1150003633.
  6. Berger, Charles R.; Calabrese, Richard J. (January 1975). "Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Developmental Theory of Interpersonal Communication". Human Communication Research. 1 (2): 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x. S2CID   144506084.
  7. Jackson, R. L. (2004). "Cultural contracts theory: Toward a critical-rhetorical identity negotiation paradigm". In Sullivan, Patricia A.; Goldzwig, Steven R. (eds.). New Approaches to Rhetoric. SAGE. pp. 89–102. ISBN   978-0-7619-2912-3.
  8. 1 2 Jackson, Ronald; Crawley, Rex (1 October 2003). "White Student Confessions about a Black Male Professor: A Cultural Contracts Theory Approach to Intimate Conversations about Race and Worldview". The Journal of Men's Studies. 12 (1): 25–41. doi:10.3149/jms.1201.25. S2CID   145538047.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jackson, Ronald L. (2004). "Cultural Contracts Theory: Toward a Critical-Rhetorical Identity Negotiation Paradigm". New Approches to Rhetoric. pp. 89–108. doi:10.4135/9781452233116.n4. ISBN   978-0-7619-2913-0.
  10. Castle Bell, Gina (27 May 2019). "'There's a difference between Black people and n******': A cultural contracts exploration of interracial communication barriers". Communication Quarterly. 67 (3): 243–270. doi:10.1080/01463373.2019.1573744. S2CID   151018920.
  11. 1 2 Lamsam, TT (2014). "A cultural contracts perspective: examining American Indian identity negotiations in academia". Journal of Cultural Diversity. 21 (1): 29–35. PMID   24855812. ProQuest   1518918170.
  12. Hecht, Michael L.; Jackson, Ronald L.; Ribeau, Sidney A. (2003). African American Communication: Exploring Identity and Culture. Routledge. p. 248. ISBN   978-1-135-64276-1.
  13. 1 2 3 Parsloe, Sarah M.; Smith, Elizabeth M. (3 July 2022). "COVID as a catalyst: shifting experiences of disability and (mis)fitting in the college classroom". Communication Education. 71 (3): 204–222. doi:10.1080/03634523.2022.2078497. S2CID   249145515.
  14. 1 2 Fullman, Aaron (2015). That's Pretty Cool: A Look at the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge as a Rhetorical Moment. University of Nebraska at Omaha. ISBN   978-1-339-01758-7.[ page needed ]
  15. 1 2 3 4 Onwumechili, Chuka; Nwosu, Peter O.; Jackson, Ronald L.; James-Hughes, Jacqueline (February 2003). "In the deep valley with mountains to climb: exploring identity and multiple reacculturation". International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 27 (1): 41–62. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00063-9.
  16. Harris, Tina M. (2007). "Black feminist thought and cultural contracts: Understanding the intersection and negotiation of racial, gendered, and professional identities in the academy". New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2007 (110): 55–64. doi:10.1002/tl.274.
  17. "Inter-cultural relationships work best when both sides treat each other as equals". Science Blog. April 2003.[ self-published source? ]
  18. Robinson-Moore, C. L. (20 November 2008). Beauty Perceptions and Identity Negotiations: Examining Black Female Beauty through Cultural Contracts Theory. NCA 94th Annual Convention. San Diego.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 P. Orbe, Mark; Harrison, Robert; Kauffman, Lydia D.; Laurent, Vanessa (2 October 2015). "Evolutions of Cultural Contractual Understanding: Exploring Biracial Women's Communicative Experiences". Howard Journal of Communications. 26 (4): 422–443. doi:10.1080/10646175.2015.1080638. S2CID   143411493.
  20. 1 2 Lawton, Bessie; Foeman, Anita; Brown, Laura (July 2013). "Blending Voices: Negotiating Educational Choices for Upper/Middle Class Well-Educated Interracial Couples' Children". Howard Journal of Communications. 24 (3): 215–238. doi:10.1080/10646175.2013.805974. S2CID   143697235.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 Boali, Fairooz M. (2017). Saudi Nurses and Cultural Struggle (Thesis).