![]() Artist rendering of Mars Observer in orbit around Mars | |
Names | Mars Geoscience and Climatology Orbiter |
---|---|
Mission type | Mars orbiter |
Operator | NASA / JPL |
COSPAR ID | 1992-063A |
SATCAT no. | 22136 |
Website | science.nasa.gov |
Mission duration | 330 days Mission failure |
Spacecraft properties | |
Bus | Mars Observer bus (AS-4000-TIROS/DMSP hybrid) |
Manufacturer | General Electric Astro Space |
Launch mass | 1,018 kg (2,244 lb) |
Power | 1,147 watts |
Start of mission | |
Launch date | September 25, 1992, 17:05:01 UTC |
Rocket | Commercial Titan III/TOS |
Launch site | Cape Canaveral LC-40 |
Contractor | Martin Marietta |
End of mission | |
Last contact | August 21, 1993, 01:00 UTC |
Orbital parameters | |
Reference system | Areocentric |
Semi-major axis | 3,766.159 km (2,340.183 mi) |
Eccentricity | 0.004049 |
Inclination | 92.869° |
Epoch | December 6, 1993 Planned |
Flyby of Mars (failed insertion) | |
Closest approach | August 24, 1993 |
Mars Observer was an American robotic space probe launched by NASA on September 25, 1992 to study the surface, atmosphere, climate and magnetic field of Mars. The spacecraft was developed and managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
The project originated with a 1984 proposal for a new Mars mission, originally titled the Mars Geoscience Climatology Orbiter. As the first and ultimately only mission in the Planetary Observer program, its design was based on earlier Earth-orbiting satellites, including the TIROS and DMSP series. Eight scientific instruments were included.
On August 21, 1993, during the interplanetary cruise phase, communication with Mars Observer was lost, three days prior to the probe's scheduled orbital insertion around Mars. Attempts to re-establish communications with the spacecraft were unsuccessful. Investigators concluded that the likely cause of the failure was a rupture of the fuel pressurization tank in the craft's propulsion system. Several instruments designed for Mars Observer, including the Mars Orbiter Camera, were successfully flown on subsequent missions, beginning with Mars Global Surveyor in 1996.
In October 1984, NASA approved a new mission to Mars, considered high priority by the Solar System Exploration Committee. The original name of the mission was the Mars Geoscience Climatology Orbiter, emphasizing the scientific goals of geology, geophysics and climatology. [1] The Martian orbiter was planned to expand on the information already gathered by the Viking program. Preliminary mission goals expected the probe to provide planetary magnetic field data, detection of certain spectral line signatures of minerals on the surface, images of the surface at 1 meter/pixel and global elevation data. [2] The Jet Propulsion Laboratory managed the project for NASA, and was responsible for mission design, acquisition of science instruments, and direction of flight operations. [1]
Mars Observer was originally planned to be launched in 1990 by a Space Shuttle orbiter. The possibility for an expendable rocket to be used was also suggested, if the spacecraft was designed to meet certain constraints. [2] On March 12, 1987, the mission was rescheduled for launch in 1992, with NASA explaining that this was due to budget concerns over the cost of the launch vehicle. [3] Instead, other missions ( Galileo , Magellan , and Ulysses ) that had been backlogged after the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster were given priority. Along with a launch delay, budget overruns necessitated the elimination of two instruments to meet the 1992 planned launch: a mapping spectrometer was removed for programmatic reasons, and a laser altimeter was substituted for the original, more complex radar altimeter. [1] [4] [5] As the development matured, the primary science objectives were finalized as: [4] [6] [7]
The program's total cost is estimated at $813 million. [8]
The Mars Observer spacecraft had a mass of 1,018 kilograms (2,244 lb). Its bus measured 1.1 meters tall, 2.2 meters wide, and 1.6 meters deep. The spacecraft was based on previous satellite designs, originally intended and developed to orbit Earth. The RCA AS-4000 Ku-band satellite design was used extensively for the spacecraft bus, propulsion, thermal protection, and solar array. RCA TIROS and DMSP Block 50-2 satellite designs were also utilized in the implementing the Attitude and Articulation Control System (AACS), command and data handling subsystem, and power subsystem, into Mars Observer. Other elements such as the bipropellant components and high-gain antenna were designed specifically for the mission. [9] [8] [10]
Mars Observer Camera (MOC) | ||||
![]() - see diagram |
Consists of narrow-angle and wide-angle telescopic cameras to study the meteorology/climatology and geoscience of Mars. [13]
| |||
Mars Observer Laser Altimeter (MOLA) | ||||
![]() - see diagram |
A laser altimeter used to define the topography of Mars. [14]
| |||
Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) | ||||
![]() - see diagram |
Uses three sensors (Michelson interferometer, solar reflectance sensor, broadband radiance sensor) to measure thermal infrared emissions to map the mineral content of surface rocks, frosts and the composition of clouds. [15]
| |||
Pressure Modulator Infrared Radiometer (PMIRR) | ||||
![]() |
Uses narrow-band radiometric channels and two pressure modulation cells to measure atmospheric and surface emissions in the thermal infrared and a visible channel to measure dust particles and condensates in the atmosphere and on the surface at varying longitudes and seasons. [16]
| |||
Gamma Ray Spectrometer (GRS) | ||||
![]() - see diagram |
Records the spectrum of gamma rays and neutrons emitted by the radioactive decay of elements contained in the Martian surface. [17]
| |||
Magnetometer and Electron Reflectometer (MAG/ER) | ||||
![]() |
Uses the components of the on-board telecommunications system and the stations of the Deep Space Network to collect data on the nature of the magnetic field and interactions the field may have with solar wind. [18]
| |||
Radio Science experiment (RS) | ||||
![]() |
Collects data on the gravity field and the Martian atmospheric structure with a special emphasis on temporal changes near the polar regions. [19]
| |||
Mars Balloon Relay (MBR) | ||||
Planned as augmentation to return data from the penetrators and surface stations of the Russian Mars '94 mission and from penetrators, surface stations, a rover, and a balloon from the Mars '96 mission. [20]
| ||||
Timeline of operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Items in red were unrealized events. |
Mars Observer was launched on September 25, 1992, at 17:05:01 UTC by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration from Space Launch Complex 40 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida, aboard a Commercial Titan III CT-4 launch vehicle. The complete burn sequence lasted for 34 minutes after a solid propellant Transfer Orbit Stage placed the spacecraft into an 11-month, Mars transfer trajectory, at a final speed of 5.28 km/s with respect to Mars. [10]
On August 25, 1992, particulate contamination was found within the spacecraft. After a full inspection, a cleaning was determined necessary and was performed on August 29. The suspected cause of the contamination were measures taken to protect the spacecraft prior to the landfall of Hurricane Andrew which struck the coast of Florida on August 24. [10] [21] [22]
Mars Observer was scheduled to perform an orbital insertion maneuver on August 24, 1993, but contact with the spacecraft was lost on August 21, 1993. The likely reason for the spacecraft failure was the leakage of fuel and oxidizer vapors through the improperly designed PTFE check valve to the common pressurization system. During interplanetary cruise, the vapor mix had accumulated in feed lines and pressurant lines, resulting in explosion and their rupture after the engine was restarted for routine course correction. Although none of the primary objectives were achieved, the mission provided interplanetary cruise phase data, collected up to the date of last contact. This data would be useful for subsequent missions to Mars. Science instruments originally developed for Mars Observer were placed on four subsequent spacecraft to complete the mission objectives: Mars Global Surveyor launched in 1996, Mars Climate Orbiter launched in 1998, 2001 Mars Odyssey launched in 2001m and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter launched in 2005. [23]
On August 24, 1993, Mars Observer would turn 180 degrees and ignite the bipropellant thrusters to slow the spacecraft, entering into a highly elliptical orbit. Over the next three months, subsequent "transfer to lower orbit" (TLO) maneuvers would be performed as the spacecraft reached periapsis, eventually resulting in an approximately circular, 118-minute orbit around Mars. [24]
The primary mission was to begin on November 23, 1993, collecting data during one Martian year (approximately 687 Earth days). The first global map was expected to be completed on December 16, followed by solar conjunction beginning on December 20, and lasting for nineteen days, ending on January 3, 1994; during this time, mission operations would be suspended as radio contact would not be possible. [24]
Orbiting Mars at an approximate speed of 3.4 km/s, the spacecraft would travel around Mars in a north to south, polar orbit. As the spacecraft circles the planet, horizon sensors indicate the orientation of the spacecraft while the reaction wheels would maintain the orientation of the instruments, towards Mars. The chosen orbit was also Sun-synchronous, allowing the daylit side of Mars to always be captured during the mid-afternoon of each Martian Sol. While some instruments could provide a real-time data link when Earth was in view of the spacecraft, data would also be recorded to the digital tape recorders and played back to Earth each day. Over 75 gigabytes of scientific data was expected to be yielded during the primary mission, much more than any previous mission to Mars. The end of the operable life for the spacecraft was expected to be limited by the supply of propellant and the condition of the batteries. [24]
On August 21, 1993, at 01:00 UTC, three days prior to the scheduled Mars orbital insertion, there was an "inexplicable" loss of contact with Mars Observer. [25] New commands were sent every 20 minutes in the hopes that the spacecraft had drifted off course and could regain contact. However, the attempt was unsuccessful. [25] It is unknown whether the spacecraft was able to follow its automatic programming and go into Mars orbit or if it flew by Mars and is now in a heliocentric orbit.
On January 4, 1994, an independent investigation board from the Naval Research Laboratory, announced their findings: the most probable cause in the loss of communication was a rupture of the fuel pressurization tank in the spacecraft's propulsion system. [26] It is believed that hypergolic fuel may have leaked past valves in the system during the cruise to Mars, allowing the fuel and oxidizer to combine prematurely before reaching the combustion chamber. The leaking fuel and gas probably resulted in a high spin rate, causing the spacecraft to enter into the "contingency mode"; this interrupted the stored command sequence and did not turn the transmitter on. [26] A NASA investigation board further suggested that too much reliance may have been placed on spacecraft hardware that had been designed for fundamentally different operations than required of the Mars Observer mission. [1]
Quoted from the report [26] |
---|
Because the telemetry transmitted from the Observer had been commanded off and subsequent efforts to locate or communicate with the spacecraft failed, the board was unable to find conclusive evidence pointing to a particular event that caused the loss of the Observer. However, after conducting extensive analyses, the board reported that the most probable cause of the loss of communications with the spacecraft on August 21, 1993, was a rupture of the fuel (monomethyl hydrazine (MMH)) pressurization side of the spacecraft's propulsion system, resulting in a pressurized leak of both helium gas and liquid MMH under the spacecraft's thermal blanket. The gas and liquid would most likely have leaked out from under the blanket in an unsymmetrical manner, resulting in a net spin rate. This high spin rate would cause the spacecraft to enter into the "contingency mode," which interrupted the stored command sequence and thus, did not turn the transmitter on. Additionally, this high spin rate precluded proper orientation of the solar arrays, resulting in discharge of the batteries. However, the spin effect may be academic, because the released MMH would likely attack and damage critical electrical circuits within the spacecraft. The board's study concluded that the propulsion system failure most probably was caused by the inadvertent mixing and the reaction of nitrogen tetroxide (NTO) and MMH within titanium pressurization tubing, during the helium pressurization of the propellant tanks. This reaction caused the tubing to rupture, resulting in helium and MMH being released from the tubing, thus forcing the spacecraft into a catastrophic spin and also damaging critical electrical circuits. |
NASA undertook several organizational reforms following the failure of the mission, implementing new policies to avoid over-reliance on heritage spacecraft systems and revising project management protocol. [1] Furthermore, the Mars Exploration Program was formed officially in the wake of the Mars Observer failure, with goals focused on identifying the location of water, and preparing for crewed missions to Mars. [27]