Mars Polar Lander

Last updated

The Mars Polar Lander carried two small, identical impactor probes known as "Deep Space 2 A and B". The probes were intended to strike the surface with a high velocity at approximately 73°S210°W / 73°S 210°W / -73; -210 (Deep Space 2) to penetrate the Martian soil and study the subsurface composition up to a meter in depth. However, after entering the Martian atmosphere, attempts to contact the probes failed. [4]

Deep Space 2 was funded by the New Millennium Program, and their development costs was US$28 million. [3]

Spacecraft design

The spacecraft measured 3.6 meters wide and 1.06 meters tall with the legs and solar arrays fully deployed. The base was primarily constructed with an aluminum honeycomb deck, composite graphite-epoxy sheets forming the edge, and three aluminum legs. During landing, the legs were to deploy from stowed position with compression springs and absorb the force of the landing with crushable aluminum honeycomb inserts in each leg. On the deck of the lander, a small thermal Faraday cage enclosure housed the computer, power distribution electronics and batteries, telecommunication electronics, and the capillary pump loop heat pipe (LHP) components, which maintained operable temperature. Each of these components included redundant units in the event that one may fail. [4] [1] [7]

Attitude control and propulsion

While traveling to Mars, the cruise stage was three-axis stabilized with four hydrazine monopropellant reaction engine modules, each including a 22-newton trajectory correction maneuver thruster for propulsion and a 4-newton reaction control system thruster for attitude control (orientation). Orientation of the spacecraft was performed using redundant Sun sensors, star trackers, and inertial measurement units. [1]

During descent, the lander used three clusters of pulse-modulated engines, each containing four 266-newton hydrazine monopropellant thrusters. Altitude during landing was measured by a Doppler radar system, and an attitude and articulation control subsystem (AACS) controlled the attitude to ensure the spacecraft landed at the optimal azimuth to maximize solar collection and telecommunication with the lander. [4] [1] [7]

The lander was launched with two hydrazine tanks containing 64 kilograms of propellant and pressurized with helium. Each spherical tank was located at the underside of the lander and provided propellant during the cruise and descent stages. [4] [1] [7]

Communications

During the cruise stage, communications with the spacecraft were conducted over the X band using a medium-gain, horn-shaped antenna and redundant solid state power amplifiers. For contingency measures, a low-gain omnidirectional antenna was also included. [4]

The lander was originally intended to communicate data through the failed Mars Climate Orbiter via the UHF antenna. With the orbiter lost on September 23, 1999, the lander would still be able to communicate directly to the NASA Deep Space Network through the Direct-To-Earth (DTE) link, an X band, steerable, medium-gain, parabolic antenna located on the deck. Alternatively, Mars Global Surveyor could be used as a relay using the UHF antenna at multiple times each Martian day. However the Deep Space Network could only receive data from, and not send commands to, the lander using this method. The direct-to-Earth medium-gain antenna provided a 12.6-kbit/s return channel, and the UHF relay path provided a 128-kbit/s return channel. Communications with the spacecraft would be limited to one-hour events, constrained by heat-buildup that would occur in the amplifiers. The number of communication events would also be constrained by power limitations. [4] [6] [1] [7]

Power

The cruise stage included two gallium arsenide solar arrays to power the radio system and maintain power to the batteries in the lander, which kept certain electronics warm. [4] [1]

After descending to the surface, the lander was to deploy two 3.6-meter-wide gallium arsenide solar arrays, located on either side of the spacecraft. Another two auxiliary solar arrays were located on the side to provide additional power for a total of an expected 200 watts and approximately eight to nine hours of operating time per day. [4] [1]

While the Sun would not have set below the horizon during the primary mission, too little light would have reached the solar arrays to remain warm enough for certain electronics to continue functioning. To avoid this problem, a 16-ampere-hour nickel–hydrogen battery was included to be recharged during the day and to power the heater for the thermal enclosure at night. This solution also was expected to limit the life of the lander. As the Martian days would grow colder in late summer, too little power would be supplied to the heater to avoid freezing, resulting in the battery also freezing and signaling the end of the operating life for the lander. [4] [1] [7]

Scientific instruments

Mars Descent Imager (MARDI)
Mounted to the bottom of the lander, the camera was intended to capture 30 images as the spacecraft descended to the surface. The images acquired would be used to provide geographic and geologic context to the landing area. [8]
Surface Stereo Imager (SSI)
Using a pair of charge-coupled devices (CCDs), the stereo panoramic camera was mounted to a one-meter-tall mast and would aid in the thermal evolved gas analyzer in determining areas of interest for the robotic arm. In addition, the camera would be used to estimate the column density of atmospheric dust, the optical depth of aerosols, and slant column abundances of water vapor using narrow-band imaging of the Sun. [9]
Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR)
The laser sounding instrument was intended to detect and characterize aerosols in the atmosphere up to three kilometers above the lander. The instrument operated in two modes: active mode, using an included laser diode, and acoustic mode, using the Sun as the light source for the sensor. In active mode, the laser sounder was to emit 100-nanosecond pulses at a wavelength of 0.88-micrometer into the atmosphere, and then record the duration of time to detect the light scattered by aerosols. The duration of time required for the light to return could then be used to determine the abundance of ice, dust and other aerosols in the region. In acoustic mode, the instrument measures the brightness of the sky as lit by the Sun and records the scattering of light as it passes to the sensor. [10]
Robotic Arm (RA)
Located on the front of the lander, the robotic arm was a meter-long aluminum tube with an elbow joint and an articulated scoop attached to the end. The scoop was intended to be used to dig into the soil in the direct vicinity of the lander. The soil could then be analyzed in the scoop with the robotic arm camera or transferred into the thermal evolved gas analyzer. [9]
Robotic Arm Camera (RAC)
Located on the robotic arm, the charge coupled camera included two red, two green, and four blue lamps to illuminate soil samples for analysis. [9]
Meteorological Package (MET)
Several instruments related to sensing and recording weather patterns, were included in the package. Wind, temperature, pressure, and humidity sensors were located on the robotic arm and two deployable masts: a 1.2-meter main mast, located on top of the lander, and a 0.9-meter secondary submast that would deploy downward to acquire measurements close to the ground. [9]
Thermal and Evolved Gas Analyzer (TEGA)
The instrument was intended to measure abundances of water, water ice, adsorbed carbon dioxide, oxygen, and volatile-bearing minerals in surface and subsurface soil samples collected and transferred by the robotic arm. Materials placed onto a grate inside one of the eight ovens, would be heated and vaporized at 1,000 °C. The evolved gas analyzer would then record measurements using a spectrometer and an electrochemical cell. For calibration, an empty oven would also be heated during this process for differential scanning calorimetry. The difference in the energy required to heat each oven would then indicate concentrations of water ice and other minerals containing water or carbon dioxide. [9]
Mars Microphone
The microphone was intended to be the first instrument to record sounds on another planet. Primarily composed of a microphone generally used with hearing aids, the instrument was expected to record sounds of blowing dust, electrical discharges and the sounds of the operating spacecraft in either 2.6-second or 10.6-second, 12-bit samples. [11] The microphone was built using off-the-shelf parts including a Sensory, Inc. RSC-164 integrated circuit typically used in speech-recognition devices. [12]

Mission profile

Mars Polar Lander
Mars Polar Lander - artist depiction.png
Artist's depiction of the Mars Polar Lander on the Martian surface
NamesMars Surveyor '98 Lander
Mission type Mars lander
Operator NASA / JPL
COSPAR ID 1999-001A OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
SATCAT no. 25605
Website science.nasa.gov
Mission duration334 days
Mission failure
Spacecraft properties
Manufacturer Martin Marietta
Launch mass290 kg [1]
Power200 W solar array and NiH2 battery
Start of mission
Launch date20:21:10,January 3, 1999(UTC) (1999-01-03T20:21:10Z)
Rocket Delta II 7425-9.5
D-265
Launch site Cape Canaveral Air Force Station SLC-17A
Contractor Boeing
End of mission
DisposalCommunication failure after landing
DeclaredJanuary 17, 2000 (2000-01-17)
Last contact20:00,December 3, 1999(UTC) (1999-12-03T20:00Z)
Mars impact (failed landing)
Impact date~20:15 UTC ERT, December 3, 1999
Impact site Ultimi Scopuli, 76°S195°W / 76°S 195°W / -76; -195 (Mars Polar Lander) (projected)
Timeline of observations
DateEvent
1999-01-03
Spacecraft launched at 20:21:10 UTC
1999-12-03
1999-12-03
2000-01-17
Mission declared a loss. No further attempts to contact.

Launch and trajectory

Mars Polar Lander was launched on January 3, 1999, at 20:21:10 UTC by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration from Space Launch Complex 17B at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida, aboard a Delta II 7425–9.5 launch vehicle. The complete burn sequence lasted for 47.7 minutes after a Thiokol Star 48B solid-fuel third stage booster placed the spacecraft into an 11-month, Mars transfer trajectory at a final velocity of 6.884 kilometers per second with respect to Mars. During cruise, the spacecraft was stowed inside an aeroshell capsule and a segment known as the cruise stage provided power and communications with Earth. [4] [6] [1]

Landing zone

The target landing zone was a region near the south pole of Mars, called Ultimi Scopuli, because it featured a large number of scopuli (lobate or irregular scarps).[ citation needed ]

Landing attempt

Mars Polar Lander - cruise configuration.png
Cruise configuration
Mars Polar Lander - landing diagram.png
Landing procedure
Mars Polar Lander - targeted landing sector.png
Landing region
Mars Polar Lander entered the Martian atmosphere with an aeroshell for protection from atmospheric friction.

On December 3, 1999, Mars Polar Lander arrived at Mars and mission operators began preparations for landing. At 14:39:00 UTC, the cruise stage was jettisoned, which began a planned communication dropout to last until the spacecraft had touched down on the surface. Six minutes prior to atmospheric entry, a programmed 80-second thruster firing turned the spacecraft to the proper entry orientation, with the heat shield positioned to absorb the 1,650 °C heat that would be generated as the descent capsule passed through the atmosphere.

Traveling at 6.9 kilometers per second, the entry capsule entered the Martian atmosphere at 20:10:00 UTC, and was expected to land in the vicinity of 76°S195°W / 76°S 195°W / -76; -195 (Mars Polar Lander) in a region known as Planum Australe. Reestablishment of communication was anticipated for 20:39:00 UTC, after landing. However communication was not reestablished, and the lander was declared lost. [4] [6] [1]

On May 25, 2008, the Phoenix lander arrived at Mars, and has subsequently completed most of the objectives of the Mars Polar Lander, carrying several of the same or derivative instruments.

(view * discuss) Interactive image map of the global topography of Mars, overlaid with the position of Martian rovers and landers. Coloring of the base map indicates relative elevations of Martian surface. Clickable image: Clicking on the labels will open a new article. ( .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Active * Inactive * Planned) (See also: Mars map; Mars Memorials list) Mars Map.JPG
Interactive image map of the global topography of Mars, overlaid with the position of Martian rovers and landers. Coloring of the base map indicates relative elevations of Martian surface.
Mano cursor.svg Clickable image:Clicking on the labels will open a new article.
(  Active •   Inactive •   Planned)
PhoenixIcon.png Beagle 2
CuriosityIcon.png
Curiosity
PhoenixIcon.png
Deep Space 2
PhoenixIcon.png InSight
Mars3landericon.jpg Mars 2
Mars3landericon.jpg Mars 3
Mars3landericon.jpg Mars 6
PhoenixIcon.png
Mars Polar Lander ↓
RoverIcon.png Opportunity
CuriosityIcon.png
Perseverance
PhoenixIcon.png Phoenix
RoverIcon.png Rosalind Franklin
EDMIcon.png
Schiaparelli EDM
SojournerIcon.png Sojourner
RoverIcon.png
Spirit
ZhurongIcon.jpg Zhurong
VikingIcon.png
Viking 1
VikingIcon.png Viking 2

Intended operations

Traveling at approximately 6.9 kilometers/second and 125 kilometers above the surface, the spacecraft entered the atmosphere and was initially decelerated by using a 2.4 meter ablation heat shield, located on the bottom of the entry body, to aerobrake through 116 kilometers of the atmosphere. Three minutes after entry, the spacecraft had slowed to 496 meters per second, signaling an 8.4-meter polyester parachute to deploy from a mortar, followed immediately by heat shield separation and MARDI powering on while 8.8 kilometers above the surface. The parachute further slowed the speed of the spacecraft to 85 meters per second when the ground radar began tracking surface features to detect the best possible landing location and determine the vertical speed via the Doppler effect for thrust control.

When the spacecraft had slowed to 80 meters per second, one minute after parachute deployment, the lander separated from the backshell and began a powered descent at 1.3 kilometers aloft. Vertical speed was intended to drop to 2.4 meters per second at 12 m height and then be constant until touchdown. Below 40 meters, the radar would become unreliable by raised dust and was switched off already at that height; for the final seconds, the thrust would be controlled by inertial sensors. A function to switch off the thrust immediately at touchdown was also armed at 40 meters. Touchdown was expected at 20:01 UTC, given as 20:15 ″Earth-received time″. [4] [6] [1] [7]

Lander operations were to begin five minutes after touchdown, first unfolding the stowed solar arrays, followed by orienting the medium-gain, direct-to-Earth antenna to allow for the first communication with the NASA Deep Space Network. A 45-minute transmission was to be broadcast to Earth containing 30 landing images acquired by MARDI. Arrival of that signal of a successful landing was expected at 20:39 UTC. The lander would then power down for six hours to allow the batteries to charge. On the following days, the spacecraft instruments would be checked by operators and science experiments were to begin on December 7 and last for at least the following 90 Martian Sols, with the possibility of an extended mission. [4] [6] [1] [7]

Loss of communications

On December 3, 1999, at 14:39:00 UTC, the last telemetry from Mars Polar Lander was sent, just prior to cruise stage separation and the subsequent atmospheric entry. No further signals were received from the spacecraft. Attempts were made by the Mars Global Surveyor to photograph the area in which the lander was believed to be. An object was visible and believed to be the lander. However, subsequent imaging in September 2005 resulted in the identified object being ruled out. Mars Polar Lander remains lost. [13] [14]

The cause of the communication loss is not known. However, the Failure Review Board concluded that the most likely cause of the mishap was a software error that incorrectly identified vibrations, caused by the deployment of the stowed legs, as surface touchdown. [15] The resulting action by the spacecraft was the shutdown of the descent engines, while still likely 40 meters above the surface. Although it was known that leg deployment could create the false indication, the software's design instructions did not account for that eventuality. [16]

In addition to the premature shutdown of the descent engines, the Failure Review Board also assessed other potential modes of failure. [2] Lacking substantial evidence for the mode of failure, the following possibilities could not be excluded:

The failure of the Mars Polar Lander took place two and a half months after the loss of the Mars Climate Orbiter. Inadequate funding and poor management have been cited as underlying causes of the failures. [17] According to Thomas Young, chairman of the Mars Program Independent Assessment Team, the program "was under funded by at least 30%." [18]

Quoted from the report [2]

"A magnetic sensor is provided in each of the three landing legs to sense touchdown when the lander contacts the surface, initiating the shutdown of the descent engines. Data from MPL engineering development unit deployment tests, MPL flight unit deployment tests, and Mars 2001 deployment tests showed that a spurious touchdown indication occurs in the Hall Effect touchdown sensor during landing leg deployment (while the lander is connected to the parachute). The software logic accepts this transient signal as a valid touchdown event if it persists for two consecutive readings of the sensor. The tests showed that most of the transient signals at leg deployment are indeed long enough to be accepted as valid events, therefore, it is almost a certainty that at least one of the three would have generated a spurious touchdown indication that the software accepted as valid.

The software—intended to ignore touchdown indications prior to the enabling of the touchdown sensing logic—was not properly implemented, and the spurious touchdown indication was retained. The touchdown sensing logic is enabled at 40 meters altitude, and the software would have issued a descent engine thrust termination at this time in response to a (spurious) touchdown indication.

At 40 meters altitude, the lander has a velocity of approximately 13 meters per second, which, in the absence of thrust, is accelerated by Mars gravity to a surface impact velocity of approximately 22 meters per second (the nominal touchdown velocity is 2.4 meters per second). At this impact velocity, the lander could not have survived."

Planum Australe, which served as the exploration target for the lander and the two Deep Space 2 probes, [19] would in later years be explored by European Space Agency's MARSIS radar, which examined and analyzed the site from Mars' orbit. [20] [21] [22] [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Mars Observer</i> Failed NASA orbiter mission to Mars (1992–1993)

The Mars Observer spacecraft, also known as the Mars Geoscience/Climatology Orbiter, was a robotic space probe launched by NASA on September 25, 1992, to study the Martian surface, atmosphere, climate and magnetic field. On August 21, 1993, during the interplanetary cruise phase, communication with the spacecraft was lost, three days prior to the probe's orbital insertion. Attempts to re-establish communications with the spacecraft were unsuccessful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars 6</span> Soviet flyby/lander mission to Mars (1973–1974)

Mars 6, also known as 3MP No.50P was a Soviet spacecraft launched to explore Mars. A 3MP bus spacecraft launched as part of the Mars program, it consisted of a lander, and a coast stage with instruments to study Mars as it flew past.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars 2</span> Soviet orbiter and lander mission to Mars (1971–1972)

The Mars 2 was an uncrewed space probe of the Mars program, a series of uncrewed Mars landers and orbiters launched by the Soviet Union beginning 19 May 1971.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars 3</span> Soviet orbiter/lander mission to Mars (1971–1972)

Mars 3 was a robotic space probe of the Soviet Mars program, launched May 28, 1971, nine days after its twin spacecraft Mars 2. The probes were identical robotic spacecraft launched by Proton-K rockets with a Blok D upper stage, each consisting of an orbiter and an attached lander.

<i>Mars Express</i> European orbiter mission to Mars (2003–present)

Mars Express is a space exploration mission being conducted by the European Space Agency (ESA). The Mars Express mission is exploring the planet Mars, and is the first planetary mission attempted by the agency. "Express" originally referred to the speed and efficiency with which the spacecraft was designed and built. However, "Express" also describes the spacecraft's relatively short interplanetary voyage, a result of being launched when the orbits of Earth and Mars brought them closer than they had been in about 60,000 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lander (spacecraft)</span> Type of spacecraft

A lander is a spacecraft that descends towards, then comes to rest on the surface of an astronomical body other than Earth. In contrast to an impact probe, which makes a hard landing that damages or destroys the probe upon reaching the surface, a lander makes a soft landing after which the probe remains functional.

<i>Mars Global Surveyor</i> NASA orbiter mission to Mars (1996–2006)

Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) was an American robotic space probe developed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and launched November 1996. MGS was a global mapping mission that examined the entire planet, from the ionosphere down through the atmosphere to the surface. As part of the larger Mars Exploration Program, Mars Global Surveyor performed atmospheric monitoring for sister orbiters during aerobraking, and helped Mars rovers and lander missions by identifying potential landing sites and relaying surface telemetry.

<i>Beagle 2</i> Failed Mars lander launched in 2003

The Beagle 2 was an inoperative British Mars lander that was transported by the European Space Agency's 2003 Mars Express mission. It was intended to conduct an astrobiology mission that would have looked for evidence of past life on Mars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars Exploration Rover</span> NASA mission to explore Mars via two rovers

NASA's Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission was a robotic space mission involving two Mars rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, exploring the planet Mars. It began in 2003 with the launch of the two rovers to explore the Martian surface and geology; both landed on Mars at separate locations in January 2004. Both rovers far outlived their planned missions of 90 Martian solar days: MER-A Spirit was active until March 22, 2010, while MER-B Opportunity was active until June 10, 2018.

<i>Mars Climate Orbiter</i> Failed NASA mission to Mars (1998–1999)

The Mars Climate Orbiter was a robotic space probe launched by NASA on December 11, 1998, to study the Martian climate, Martian atmosphere, and surface changes and to act as the communications relay in the Mars Surveyor '98 program for Mars Polar Lander. However, on September 23, 1999, communication with the spacecraft was permanently lost as it went into orbital insertion. The spacecraft encountered Mars on a trajectory that brought it too close to the planet, and it was destroyed in the atmosphere. An investigation attributed the failure to a measurement mismatch between two measurement systems: SI units (metric) by NASA and US customary units by spacecraft builder Lockheed Martin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exploration of Mars</span>

The planet Mars has been explored remotely by spacecraft. Probes sent from Earth, beginning in the late 20th century, have yielded a large increase in knowledge about the Martian system, focused primarily on understanding its geology and habitability potential. Engineering interplanetary journeys is complicated and the exploration of Mars has experienced a high failure rate, especially the early attempts. Roughly sixty percent of all spacecraft destined for Mars failed before completing their missions, with some failing before their observations could begin. Some missions have been met with unexpected success, such as the twin Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, which operated for years beyond their specification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deep Space 2</span> Failed NASA impactor mission to Mars (1999)

Deep Space 2 was a NASA space probe, part of the New Millennium Program. It included two highly advanced miniature space probes that were sent to Mars aboard the Mars Polar Lander in January 1999. The probes were named "Scott" and "Amundsen", in honor of Robert Falcon Scott and Roald Amundsen, the first explorers to reach the Earth's South Pole. Intended to be the first spacecraft to penetrate below the surface of another planet, after entering the Mars atmosphere DS2 was to detach from the Mars Polar Lander mother ship and plummet to the surface using only an aeroshell impactor, with no parachute. The mission was declared a failure on March 13, 2000, after all attempts to reestablish communications following the descent went unanswered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars 96</span> Failed Mars mission

Mars 96 was a failed Mars mission launched in 1996 to investigate Mars by the Russian Space Forces and not directly related to the Soviet Mars probe program of the same name. After failure of the second fourth-stage burn, the probe assembly re-entered the Earth's atmosphere, breaking up over a 320 km (200 mi) long portion of the Pacific Ocean, Chile, and Bolivia. The Mars 96 spacecraft was based on the Phobos probes launched to Mars in 1988. They were of a new design at the time and both ultimately failed. For the Mars 96 mission the designers believed they had corrected the flaws of the Phobos probes, but the value of their improvements was never demonstrated due to the destruction of the probe during the launch phase.

<i>Phoenix</i> (spacecraft) NASA Mars lander

Phoenix was an uncrewed space probe that landed on the surface of Mars on May 25, 2008, and operated until November 2, 2008. Phoenix was operational on Mars for 157 sols. Its instruments were used to assess the local habitability and to research the history of water on Mars. The mission was part of the Mars Scout Program; its total cost was $420 million, including the cost of launch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars Surveyor 2001</span> Cancelled NASA spaceflight mission in the Mars Exploration Program

The Mars Surveyor 2001 project was a multi-part Mars exploration mission intended as a follow-up to Mars Surveyor '98. After the two probes of the 1998 project, Mars Climate Orbiter and Mars Polar Lander, were both lost, NASA's "better, faster, cheaper" exploration philosophy was re-evaluated, with a particular eye on the two 2001 project probes. As a result, the mission, along with the launch of its lander and rover, were canceled in May 2000, but the decision was made to continue development with its orbiter counterpart. The orbiter launched as 2001 Mars Odyssey in April 2001, in a mission independent of the Mars Surveyor project, and reached Mars in October 2001. After being placed in a cleanroom in 2001 and stored since, the nearly-completed lander component was eventually reused to fly the Phoenix mission, which launched in August 2007 and landed successfully on Mars in May 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars landing</span> Landing of a spacecraft on the surface of Mars

A Mars landing is a landing of a spacecraft on the surface of Mars. Of multiple attempted Mars landings by robotic, uncrewed spacecraft, ten have had successful soft landings. There have also been studies for a possible human mission to Mars including a landing, but none have been attempted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Light (spacecraft)</span> Cancelled Canadian Mars lander and rover mission

Northern Light was a concept mission for a robotic mission to Mars that would consist of a lander and a rover, being studied by a consortium of Canadian universities, companies and organisations. The primary contractor for the spacecraft was Thoth Technology Inc.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">InSight</span> NASA Mars lander (2018–2022)

The Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport (InSight) mission was a robotic lander designed to study the deep interior of the planet Mars. It was manufactured by Lockheed Martin Space, was managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and two of its three scientific instruments were built by European agencies. The mission launched on 5 May 2018 at 11:05:01 UTC aboard an Atlas V-401 launch vehicle and successfully landed at Elysium Planitia on Mars on 26 November 2018 at 19:52:59 UTC. InSight was active on Mars for 1440 sols.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars Geyser Hopper</span> Proposed robotic mission to explore carbon dioxide geysers on Mars

The Mars Geyser Hopper (MGH) was proposed in 2012 as a NASA design reference mission for a Discovery-class spacecraft concept that would investigate the springtime carbon dioxide Martian geysers found in regions around the south pole of Mars.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 "Mars Polar Lander". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. NASA . Retrieved 1 December 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 "Report on the Loss of the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Missions" (PDF). NASA / JPL. 22 March 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 March 2011.
  3. 1 2 "Mars Polar Lander Mission Costs". Associated Press . 8 December 1999. Archived from the original on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 "1998 Mars Missions" (PDF) (Press release). NASA / JPL. December 1998. Archived from the original (Press Kit) on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  5. ↑ Ben Huh (3 March 1998). "Kids' Names Going To Mars". Sun Sentinel. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Mars Polar Lander/Deep Space 2" (PDF) (Press release). NASA / JPL. December 1999. Archived from the original (Press Kit) on 23 December 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Mars Polar Lander / Deep Space 2 - NASA Science". science.nasa.gov. NASA . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  8. ↑ "Mars Polar Lander: Mars Descent Imager (MARDI)". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. NASA . Retrieved 17 March 2011.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 "Mars Polar Lander: Mars Volatiles and Climate Surveyor (MVACS)". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. NASA . Retrieved 17 March 2011.
  10. ↑ "Mars Polar Lander: Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR)". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. NASA . Retrieved 17 March 2011.
  11. ↑ "Mars Polar Lander: Mars Microphone". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. NASA . Retrieved 17 March 2011.
  12. ↑ "Projects: Planetary Microphones -- The Mars Microphone". The Planetary Society . Archived from the original on 18 August 2006.
  13. ↑ "Mars Polar Lander Found at Last?". Sky & Telescope . 6 May 2005. Archived from the original on 23 July 2008. Retrieved 22 April 2009.
  14. ↑ "Mars Polar Lander NOT Found". www.msss.com. NASA / JPL. 17 October 2005. MGS-MOC2-1253. Archived from the original on 7 December 2008. Retrieved 22 April 2009.
  15. ↑ NASA 3: Mission Failures on YouTube
  16. ↑ Nancy G. Leveson (July 2004). "The Role of Software in Recent Aerospace Accidents" (PDF). Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 41 (4). doi:10.2514/1.11950.
  17. ↑ Thomas Young (13 March 2000). Mars Program Independent Assessment Team Summary Report (Report). Draft #7. House Science and Technology Committee. Retrieved 22 April 2009.{{cite report}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  18. ↑ Jeffrey Kaye (14 April 2000). "NASA in the Hot Seat". NewsHour with Jim Lehrer. PBS. Archived from the original (transcript) on 26 December 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2009.
  19. ↑ Ben Evans (6 January 2019). "'Could Not Have Survived': 20 Years Since NASA's Ill-Fated Mars Polar Lander". AmericaSpace. Retrieved 15 April 2022.
  20. ↑ R. Orosei; S. E. Lauro; E. Pettinelli; A. Cicchetti; M. Coradini; et al. (25 July 2018). "Radar Evidence of Subglacial Liquid Water on Mars". Science . 361 (6401): 490–493. arXiv: 2004.04587 . Bibcode:2018Sci...361..490O. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7268 . hdl:11573/1148029. PMID   30045881.
  21. ↑ Kenneth Chang; Dennis Overbye (25 July 2018). "A Watery Lake Is Detected on Mars, Raising the Potential for Alien Life". The New York Times . Retrieved 15 April 2022.
  22. ↑ "Huge reservoir of liquid water detected under the surface of Mars". EurekAlert. 25 July 2018. Retrieved 15 April 2022.
  23. ↑ Mary Halton (25 July 2018). "Liquid water 'lake' revealed on Mars". BBC News . Retrieved 15 April 2022.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.