Minnesota Amendment 2

Last updated

Referendum 2
Voter ID Amendment
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes1,362,03046.16%
Light brown x.svg No1,588,75253.84%
Valid votes2,950,782100.00%
Invalid or blank votes00.00%
Total votes2,950,782100.00%

MN Amendment 2 2012.svg
Precinct results
Map of results shaded by winning percentage. Deeper reds are more no votes, and darker greens are more yes votes 2012VoterIDMeasureMNResults.svg
Map of results shaded by winning percentage. Deeper reds are more no votes, and darker greens are more yes votes

Minnesota Amendment 2 (also called Voter ID Amendment [1] ) was a proposed legislatively referred constitutional amendment that was on the ballot on November 6, 2012. If approved, it would have required a form of photographic identification before being permitted to vote in Minnesota municipal, state, and federal elections. However, it was defeated with 53.84% voting against and 46.16% for the measure. [2]

Contents

Legislative approval

The Minnesota Legislature approved the amendment for the ballot in April 2012 on essentially a party-line vote. The amendment was promoted by Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer, R-Big Lake, who had formerly served as Minnesota Secretary of State. [3]

Support and opposition

Institutional support for the measure broke down largely by party, with DFL leaders opposing the amendment, and Republicans supporting it. The two most recent Secretaries of State lined up on opposite sides, with Kiffmeyer pushing for adoption, and Mark Ritchie speaking against it.

Opinion polls

Date of opinion pollConducted by Sample size ForAgainstUndecided/OtherMargin of errorQuestion
May 2–5, 2011 [4] Star Tribune806 adults80%18%2%±4.7%"Please tell me if you would favor or oppose … requiring Minnesota voters to show a photo ID in order to vote."
May 23–24, 2011 [5] SurveyUSA552 RV76%18%1% not sure
4% not vote
±3.6%"If an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution were on the ballot, that requires voters to present a photo ID at the polls, would you vote for the amendment? Against the amendment? Or not vote on the measure?"
June 6–8, 2011 [6] [7] Rasmussen Reports1,000 LV75%18%7%±3%"Should voters be required to show photo identification such as a driver’s license before being allowed to vote?"
January 21–22, 2012 [8] [9] Public Policy Polling1,236 voters65%30%4%±2.8%"Do you think the Minnesota Constitution should be amended to require that voters present a current and accurate driver's license, state ID, or voter ID card in order to cast a ballot, or not?"
January 31 – February 2, 2012 [10] SurveyUSA542 RV70%23%4% not sure
4% not vote
±4%"If an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution were on the ballot that would require voters to show photo I.D.'s in order to vote on Election Day, how would you vote?"
May 31 – June 3, 2012 [11] Public Policy Polling973 voters58%34%8%±3.1%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters?"
July 17–19, 2012 [12] SurveyUSA552 LV65%28%4% not sure
2% not vote
±4.1%"An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution on the ballot would require voters to show photo I.D.'s in order to vote on Election Day. Will you vote FOR the amendment? Against the amendment? Or not vote on the measure?"
September 6–9, 2012 [13] SurveyUSA551 LV62%31%7%±4.1%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" ?"
September 10–11, 2012 [14] Public Policy Polling824 LV56%39%5% not sure±3.4%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters?"
September 17–19, 2012 [15] Mason-Dixon Polling and Research, Inc.800 LV52%44%4%±3.5%"The November ballot will include several proposed constitutional amendments. One asks "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?"
October 5–8, 2012 [16] Public Policy Polling937 LV51%43%6% not sure
0% won't vote
±3.2%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters?"
October 12–14, 2012 [17] SurveyUSA550 LV53%40%7%±4.3%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" "
October 15–21, 2012 [18] [19] St. Cloud State University Survey600 LV55%39%3% not sure
3% won't vote
±5%"This November Minnesota voters will vote on two proposed amendments to the Minnesota Constitution. One proposed amendment will ask, "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" If you were to vote today, would you vote for the amendment, vote against the amendment, or not vote on this issue??"
October 23–25, 2012 [20] [21] Mason-Dixon Polling and Research, Inc.800 LV53%41%6%±3.5%"The November ballot will include several proposed constitutional amendments. One asks "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" If the election were held today, would you vote YES in favor of the amendment NO against the amendment"
October 26–28, 2012 [22] SurveyUSA574 LV55%40%5%±4.2%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" "
November 1–3, 2012 [23] SurveyUSA556 LV48%48%5%±4.2%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" "
November 2–3, 2012 [24] Public Policy Polling1,164 LV46%51%3% not sure
0% won't vote
±2.9%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters??"

Results

Constitutional Amendment 2
Photo identification required for voting
ChoiceVotes %
Light brown x.svg No1,588,75253.84
Yes1,362,03046.16
Total votes2,950,782100.00
Source: Minnesota Secretary of State - Results for Constitutional Amendments

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 United States Senate elections</span>

The 2008 United States Senate elections were held on November 4, 2008, with 35 of the 100 seats in the Senate being contested. Thirty-three seats were up for regular elections; the winners were eligible to serve six-year terms from January 3, 2009, to January 3, 2015, as members of Class 2. There were also two special elections, the winners of those seats would finish the terms that ended January 3, 2013. The presidential election, which was won by Democrat Barack Obama, elections for all House of Representatives seats; elections for several gubernatorial elections; and many state and local elections occurred on the same date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 United States gubernatorial elections</span>

United States gubernatorial elections were held on November 7, 2006, in 36 states and two territories. The elections coincided with the midterm elections of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Ritchie (politician)</span> American politician

Donald Mark Ritchie is an American politician and a former Minnesota Secretary of State. Ritchie was elected the 21st Minnesota Secretary of State on November 7, 2006. He was re-elected in 2010.

The Tennessee Marriage Protection Amendment, also known as Tennessee Amendment 1 of 2006, is a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex unions. The referendum was approved by 81% of voters. It specified that only a marriage between a man and a woman could be legally recognized in the state of Tennessee. This prohibited same-sex marriages within the state, reinforcing previously existing statutes to the same effect until it was overturned by the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling in June 2015.

Rasmussen Reports is an American polling company founded in 2003. The company engages in political commentary and the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. Rasmussen Reports conducts nightly tracking, at national and state levels, of elections, politics, current events, consumer confidence, business topics, and the United States president's job approval ratings. Surveys by the company are conducted using a combination of automated public opinion polling involving pre-recorded telephone inquiries and an online survey. The company generates revenue by selling advertising and subscriptions to its polling survey data.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Florida Amendment 2</span> Ballot measure in Florida

Florida Amendment 2 is an amendment made to the Constitution of Florida in 2008. It added Article I, Section 27 to the constitution, which defines marriage as a union only between one man and one woman, and thus bans the creation of similar unions, such as civil unions or same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 Minnesota gubernatorial election</span> Election for the governorship of the U.S. state of Minnesota

The 2010 Minnesota gubernatorial election was held on Tuesday, November 2, 2010 to elect the 40th Governor of the U.S. state of Minnesota for a four-year term to begin in January 2011. The general election was contested by the major party candidates State Representative Tom Emmer (R–Delano), former U.S. Senator Mark Dayton (DFL), and Independence Party candidate Tom Horner. After a very close race, Dayton was elected governor. Emmer would be elected to the United States House of Representatives four years later.

Same-sex marriage has been fully recognized in Minnesota since August 1, 2013. Same-sex marriages have been recognized if performed in other jurisdictions since July 1, 2013, and the state began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on August 1, 2013. After 51.9% of state voters rejected a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in November 2012, the Minnesota Legislature passed a same-sex marriage bill in May 2013, which Governor Mark Dayton signed on May 14, 2013. Minnesota was the second state in the Midwest, after Iowa, to legalize marriage between same-sex couples, and the first in the region to do so by enacting legislation rather than by court order. Minnesota was the first state to reject a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, though Arizona rejected one in 2006 that banned all legal recognition and later approved one banning only marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Washington Referendum 71</span> LGBT rights referendum

The 2009 Washington Referendum 71 (R-71) legalized domestic partnership in Washington state, the first statewide referendum in the United States that extended to LGBT people the rights and responsibility of domestic partnership. The bill had passed State Legislature, and it was signed into law by the Governor in May 2009, but opponents gathered enough signatures to put the measure before the voters, who returned ballots by mail over three weeks ending on November 3, 2009, approving the measure 53% to 47%. The new law went into effect 30 days later, on December 3, 2009.

Before the legalization of same-sex marriage in Florida in January 2015, same-sex couples were able to have their relationships recognized in some Florida localities that had established a legal status known as domestic partnership.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Warren Limmer</span> American politician (born 1955)

Warren E. Limmer is a Minnesota politician and member of the Minnesota Senate. A member of the Republican Party of Minnesota, he represents the 34th District, which includes portions of Hennepin County in the northwestern Twin Cities metropolitan area. Limmer previously served in the Minnesota House of Representatives, and in 1998 he sought the Republican endorsement for Minnesota Secretary of State, losing to Mary Kiffmeyer. He was the author of the 2012 Minnesota constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Independence Party of Minnesota</span> Political party in Minnesota

The Independence Party of Minnesota, formerly the Reform Party of Minnesota, is a political party in the U.S. state of Minnesota. It was the party of former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura when he left the Reform Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 Illinois elections</span>

Elections were held in Illinois on Tuesday, November 2, 2010. Primary elections were held on February 2, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on same-sex marriage

Maine Question 1 was a voter referendum conducted in Maine in the United States in 2009 that rejected a law legalizing same-sex marriage in the state. The measure passed 53–47% on November 3, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on same-sex marriage

Maine Question 1 was a voter referendum on an initiated state statute that occurred on November 6, 2012. The referendum was held to determine whether or not to legalize same-sex marriage. The referendum passed with a 53-47% vote legalizing same-sex marriage in Maine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Washington Referendum 74</span>

Referendum 74 was a Washington state referendum to approve or reject the February 2012 bill that would legalize same-sex marriage in the state. On June 12, 2012, state officials announced that enough signatures in favor of the referendum had been submitted and scheduled the referendum to appear on the ballot in the November 6 general election. The law was upheld by voters in the November 6, 2012 election by a final margin of 7.4% and the result was certified on December 5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Maryland Question 6</span> Maryland same-sex marriage referendum

Question 6 is a referendum that appeared on the general election ballot for the U.S. state of Maryland to allow voters to approve or reject the Civil Marriage Protection Act—a bill legalizing same-sex marriage passed by the General Assembly in 2012. The referendum was approved by 52.4% of voters on November 6, 2012, and thereafter went into effect on January 1, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Minnesota Amendment 1</span> Proposed constitutional amendment

Minnesota Amendment 1 was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment proposed to ban marriage between same-sex couples in the state of Minnesota, that appeared on the ballot on November 6, 2012. It was rejected by 51.90% of voters.

Statewide polls for the 2016 United States presidential election are as follows. The polls listed here, by state, are from 2013 to December 31, 2015, and provide early data on opinion polling between a possible Republican candidate against a possible Democratic candidate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1954 Illinois elections</span>

Elections were held in Illinois on Tuesday, November 2, 1954.

References

  1. "Minnesota voter ID amendment defeated". twincities.com.
  2. "Voter ID Amendment". publicradio.org.
  3. "Voter ID amendment is now up to Minnesota's voters". startribune.com.
  4. MINNESOTA POLL DATA: Vast majority back photo IDs for voting Archived 2012-11-26 at the Wayback Machine
  5. "SurveyUSA News Poll #18243". www.surveyusa.com.
  6. 75% Support Showing Photo ID At The Polls Archived 2013-02-09 at archive.today
  7. Reports, Rasmussen. "Questions - Elections - June 6-8, 2011 - Rasmussen Reports®". www.rasmussenreports.com.
  8. "Minnesota Survey Results" (PDF). publicpolicypolling.com.
  9. "Dayton Sees Strong Approval in Minnesota" (PDF). publicpolicypolling.com.
  10. "SurveyUSA News Poll #18953". www.surveyusa.com.
  11. "Minnesotans' opposition to marriage amendment growing". publicpolicypolling.com.
  12. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #19394". www.surveyusa.com.
  13. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #19612". www.surveyusa.com.
  14. "Minnesota split on marriage amendment". publicpolicypolling.com.
  15. "MINNESOTA POLL RESULTS: Voter ID amendment". startribune.com.
  16. "Minnesota marriage amendment narrowly trails" (PDF). publicpolicypolling.com.
  17. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #19873". www.surveyusa.com.
  18. "St. Cloud State poll shows slender lead for opponents of marriage amendment". minnpost.com.
  19. "FALL STATEWIDE SURVEY OCTOBER, 2012" (PDF). minnpost.com.
  20. "Voter ID amendment: The poll results". startribune.com.
  21. "How the poll was conducted". startribune.com.
  22. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #20056". www.surveyusa.com.
  23. "SurveyUSA Election Poll #20105". www.surveyusa.com.
  24. "Obama up 8 in Minnesota, amendments trail for passage" (PDF). publicpolicypolling.com.