Eohupehsuchus

Last updated

Eohupehsuchus
Temporal range: Early Triassic
Eohupehsuchus.png
Holotype specimen, WGSC V26003
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Hupehsuchia
Genus: Eohupehsuchus
Chen et al., 2014
Species:
E. brevicollis
Binomial name
Eohupehsuchus brevicollis
Chen et al., 2014

Eohupehsuchus is a genus of extinct aquatic diapsid from the Upper Spathian (latest Early Triassic) of Hubei Province, located in Central China. [1] The genus is monotypic [1] and belongs to the order Hupehsuchia, whose members are characterized by toothless beak-like snouts, a row of dermal plates along their backs, and aquatic adaptations including paddle-shaped limbs and fusiform bodies with pachyostotic ribs. [2]

Contents

Eohupehsuchus is known only from its holotype, WGSC (Wuhan Centre of Geological Survey, China) V26003. It is the smallest known hupehsuchian along with Nanchangosaurus , measuring about 40 cm (16 in) long. [1] [3] Phylogenetic analyses have repeatedly recovered it as the second-most basal member of the Hupehsuchia and as the sister group to the family Hupehsuchidae. [1] [4] A pathology on the left forelimb of the holotype was interpreted by its discoverers as a bite wound from a larger marine reptile, and used to argue an early onset for modern trophic structures in marine ecosystems following the Permian-Triassic mass extinction [1] (see Paleoenvironment and paleoecology).

The generic name Eohupehsuchus comes from the Greek "eos" (Greek: ἠώς), meaning "early" or "dawn;" "Hupeh," an anglicisation of Hubei (Chinese :湖北; pinyin :Húběi); and the Greek "Suchos" (Greek: Σοũχος), meaning "Sobek." [1] (The Greek name for Sobek is a common element of scientific names for animals that resemble crocodiles, and is often translated as “crocodile” in this context, but hupehsuchians are not close relatives of crocodilians, the order that includes modern crocodiles.) The specific name brevicollis comes from the Latin "brevis," meaning "short," and "collis," meaning "neck." Thus the generic name can be translated as “early Hubei crocodile,” and the full binomial name as “short-necked early Hubei crocodile.”

Discovery and history

WGSC V26003 was discovered in Yangping, a town in Yuan’an County in Hubei Province, Central China, and excavated by Chinese paleontologists Xiao-hong Chen and Long Cheng in 2011. [1] Despite being exposed at the surface when discovered, the specimen is largely articulated and moderately complete, preserving much of the head, trunk, left pectoral girdle, and left forelimb, and parts of the left hindlimb and the anterior part of the tail. [1] However, several of the preserved elements have been extensively damaged by erosion, including the left pelvic girdle, and other elements were completely destroyed by erosion before discovery, including the tips of the jaws. [1]

The genus was named and formally diagnosed in a 2014 paper published in the open access journal PLOS One by paleontologists Xiao-hong Chen, Ryosuke Motani, Long Cheng, Da-yong Jiang, and Olivier Rieppel. [1] It was the fourth hupehsuchian to be formally named, [1] following Parahupehsuchus earlier in 2014, [4] Hupehsuchus in 1972, [5] and Nanchangosaurus in 1959, [6] and the sixth hupehsuchian to be given a full formal description [1] ( Eretmorhipus was first described in 1991, [7] but not named until 2015 after the discovery of better holotype material; [8] a sixth taxon with polydactyly similar to that found in the earliest tetrapods was partially described in 2003, but has yet to be fully described or named [9] [8] ).

Description and paleobiology

Skull

Top: the skull of the WGSC V260003. Bottom: annotated drawing of the skull, showing the rectangular frontals in red, and the posteriorly shifted parietal bones in pale yellow. Eohupehsuchus skull.jpg
Top: the skull of the WGSC V260003. Bottom: annotated drawing of the skull, showing the rectangular frontals in red, and the posteriorly shifted parietal bones in pale yellow.

Like other hupehsuchians, Eohupehsuchus has a superficially bird-like skull, with an elongate, narrowly tapered, edentulous snout that contributes more than half of its total length. [1] The genus is distinguished from other hupehsuchians in part by the shape and arrangement of bones in its skull roof: its parietal bones are further towards the back of the skull than those of Hupehsuchus and Nanchangosaurus, and its frontal bones are narrow and rectangular. [1] In contrast, in Hupehsuchus and Nanchangasaurus, the lateral posterior parts of the frontals (i.e., the regions closest to the jaw joint) are tapered and extend towards the back of the skull. [1] Based on orbit size, Eohupehsuchus was determined to have a smaller relative eye size than Nanchangosaurus, [1] although sclerotic rings have not been found for either animal. [1] [10] Paleontologists have not reached a consensus on the function of the hupehsuchian "beak," although one paper argues it was used in lunge feeding, as in modern pelicans. [11]

Spine and ribs

Eohupehsuchus has the shortest known neck among hupehsuchians, with a cervical series comprising only six vertebrae. [1] The shortness of its neck is the basis of its specific epithet, brevicollis, and distinguishes it from other hupehsuchians, along with the features of the skull roof discussed above. [1] Like other hupehsuchians, [7] Eohupehsuchus has vertebrae with bipartite neural spines consisting of a first segment that begins above the base of the neural arch and a second segment that begins above the first. [1] In Eohupehsuchus, the second segments appear throughout the dorsal series beginning with the third dorsal vertebra, and are absent in the sacral series. [1] Whether or not they reappear in the caudal series is unknown. [1] In common with Nanchangosaurus, the dorsal ribs of Eohupehsuchus are each marked by a longitudinal groove. [1]

Like other hupehsuchians, [2] [10] Eohupehsuchus has a row of boomerang-shaped, overlapping gastral elements on each side of its trunk. [1] In Eohupehsuchus, the width of the overlapping region is about one-third the width of the individual elements, and the trunk also has a third row of non-overlapping gastral elements along the midline. [1]

Limbs

The limbs of Eohupehsuchus are similar to those of other hupehsuchians in the large size ratio of the distal elements (including the phalanges, the metacarpals and carpals in the forelimbs, and the metatarsals and tarsals in the hindlimbs) to the proximal elements (the radius and ulna in the forelimbs, and the tibia and fibula in the hindlimbs). [1] This is a common feature of secondarily aquatic tetrapods in general, in which the limbs are adapted for steering and/or propulsion through water rather than walking and supporting the body against unidirectional gravity in a terrestrial environment. [12] The left forelimb of the holotype shows fractures in the distal phalanges of the second and fourth digits and kinks in the distal phalanges of the first and third. [1] Because the fractures and kinks run along a single line but do not extend into the matrix, and there are neither known fossils of scavengers from the assemblage where the specimen was found nor taphonomic evidence of scavenging in any other part of the carcass, the discoverers of Eohupehsuchus conclude that this pathology represents a bite wound from a predator. [1]

Dermal plates

Like other hupehsuchians, Eohupehsuchus has a series of dermal plates or ossicles along the midline of its back. [1] In Eohupehsuchus, these are arranged in three layers. [1] The first are positioned directly above the neural spines, with one ossicle per vertebra beginning with the first dorsal vertebra and continuing into the anterior caudal series, and fusion of the ossicles and neural spines beginning with the third dorsal vertebra. The ossicles of the second layer are positioned in the spaces in between those of the first, beginning with the space in front of the first-layer ossicle of the ninth dorsal vertebra. The ossicles of the third layer are positioned above those of the second layer, and span the distance between adjacent neural spines beginning with the tenth and eleventh dorsal vertebrae. [1]

Paleoenvironment and paleoecology

The site in Yangping where Eohupehsuchus was discovered is an exposure of the Jialingjiang Formation, [1] a laminated limestone sequence [13] determined in a 2002 survey to be Olenekian in age [14] (252.7 Ma to 247.2 Ma according to the International Stratigraphic Commission [15] ). In their paper describing Eohupehsuchus, Chen et al. more specifically attribute the horizon of the holotype to the Upper Spathian (latest Olenekian). [1] At this time, the South China plate, where the modern Jialingjiang Formation is found, was largely submerged on the eastern margin of the Paleo-Tethys Sea. [16]

Eohupehsuchus is a member of the Nanzhang-Yuan'an fauna, which includes all animals discovered in the same part of the Jialingjiang Formation. [13] This includes all known hupehsuchians, namely Nanchangosaurus , Eohupehsuchus, Parahupehsuchus , Hupehsuchus , Eretmorhipus , and the unnamed polydactylous taxon partially described in 2003. Eohupehsuchus was therefore coeval with up to five closely related animals in the Nanzhang-Yuan'an paleoenvironment. Chen et al. (2014) speculate that their coexistence may be explained by resource partitioning facilitated by body size disparity, dividing hupehsuchians into three distinct "size classes" with Nanchangosaurus and Eohupehsuchus sharing the smallest size class. [1] The 2015 redescription of Eretmorhipus further elucidated hupehsuchian morphological disparity by establishing a spectrum of forelimb shapes, with the broad, fan-like "paddles" of Eretmorhipus on one end and the narrow, pointed "flippers" of Parahupehsuchus on the other. [4] According to the authors, this diversity "further enhances morphological, and hence behavioral, variations among hupehsuchians" and "likely enabled hupehsuchians to divide resources, which allowed them, in turn, to have a high taxonomic diversity within a limited geographic area." [4]

Other members of the Nanzhang-Yuan'an fauna include the basal ichthyopterygian Chaohusaurus zhangjiawanensis [17] and the pachypleurosaurs Keichousaurus yuananensis [18] and Hanosaurus hupehensis . [19] [20] Noting the presence of pachypleurosaurs and the absence of fish among the Nanzhang-Yuan'an fauna, the authors who named Parahupehsuchus suggested that as apex predators, the pachypleurosaurs were likely to have preyed on smaller marine reptiles, including hupehsuchians. [4] According to the discoverers of Eohupehsuchus, the jaws of Hanosaurus hupehensis are sufficiently large to have caused the bite wound seen in the left forelimb of WGSC V26003, corroborating this picture of the assemblage's paleoecology. On this basis, they suggest that the trophic structure of modern marine ecosystems, in which the diet of apex predators includes secondarily aquatic tetrapods, was already present in the Early Triassic. [1]

Related Research Articles

<i>Dinocephalosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Dinocephalosaurus is a genus of long necked, aquatic protorosaur that inhabited the Triassic seas of China. The genus contains the type and only known species, D. orientalis, which was named by Li in 2003. Unlike other long-necked protorosaurs, Dinocephalosaurus convergently evolved a long neck not through elongation of individual neck vertebrae, but through the addition of neck vertebrae that each had a moderate length. As indicated by phylogenetic analyses, it belonged in a separate lineage that also included at least its closest relative Pectodens, which was named the Dinocephalosauridae in 2021. Like tanystropheids, however, Dinocephalosaurus probably used its long neck to hunt, utilizing the fang-like teeth of its jaws to ensnare prey; proposals that it employed suction feeding have not been universally accepted. It was probably a marine animal by necessity, as suggested by the poorly-ossified and paddle-like limbs which would have prevented it from going ashore.

<i>Chaohusaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Chaohusaurus is an extinct genus of basal ichthyopterygian, depending on definition possibly ichthyosaur, from the Early Triassic of Chaohu and Yuanan, China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thalattosauria</span> Extinct order of sea reptiles

Thalattosauria is an extinct order of prehistoric marine reptiles that lived in the middle to late Triassic period. Thalattosaurs were diverse in size and shape, and are divided into two superfamilies: Askeptosauroidea and Thalattosauroidea. Askeptosauroids were endemic to the Tethys Ocean, their fossils have been found in Europe and China, and they were likely semiaquatic fish eaters with straight snouts and decent terrestrial abilities. Thalattosauroids were more specialized for aquatic life and most had unusual downturned snouts and crushing dentition. Thalattosauroids lived along the coasts of both Panthalassa and the Tethys Ocean, and were most diverse in China and western North America. The largest species of thalattosaurs grew to over 4 meters (13 feet) in length, including a long, flattened tail utilized in underwater propulsion. Although thalattosaurs bore a superficial resemblance to lizards, their exact relationships are unresolved. They are widely accepted as diapsids, but experts have variously placed them on the reptile family tree among Lepidosauromorpha, Archosauromorpha, ichthyosaurs, and/or other marine reptiles.

<i>Hupehsuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Hupehsuchus is an extinct genus of small marine reptiles, about 1 m (3 ft) long, found in the area of Hubei in China. This marine reptile lived in the Olenekian stage of the Early Triassic period. It was a filter feeder, like modern baleen whales.

Nanchangosaurus is an extinct genus of aquatic reptiles native to the middle Triassic of China. It was named after the area in China, Nanchang, where it was found. It was about more than 40 cm (16 in) in length, and probably fed on fish or used its long jaws to probe for aquatic invertebrates. It resembled the ichthyosaurs in build, and may be related to them.

<i>Helveticosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Helveticosaurus is an extinct genus of diapsid marine reptile known from the Middle Triassic of southern Switzerland. It contains a single species, Helveticosaurus zollingeri, known from the nearly complete holotype T 4352 collected at Cava Tre Fontane of Monte San Giorgio, an area well known for its rich record of marine life during the Middle Triassic.

Hupehsuchia is an order of diapsid reptiles closely related to ichthyosaurs. The group was short-lasting, with a temporal range restricted to the late Olenekian age, spanning only a few million years of the Early Triassic. The order gets its name from Hubei Province, China, from which many specimens have been found. They are probable members of the clade Ichthyosauromorpha.

Dianopachysaurus is an extinct genus of pachypleurosaur known from the lower Middle Triassic of Yunnan Province, southwestern China. It was found in the Middle Triassic Lagerstatte of the Guanling Formation. It was first named by Jun Liu, Olivier Rieppel, Da-Yong Jiang, Jonathan C. Aitchison, Ryosuke Motani, Qi-Yue Zhang, Chang-Yong Zhou and Yuan-Yuan Sun in 2011 and the type species is Dianopachysaurus dingi, thanking a Professor Ding for his help.

<i>Wumengosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Wumengosaurus is an extinct aquatic reptile from the Middle Triassic Guanling Formation of Guizhou, southwestern China. It was originally described as a basal eosauropterygian and usually is recovered as such by phylogenetic analyses, although one phylogeny has placed it as the sister taxon to Ichthyosauromorpha while refraining from a formal re-positioning. It was a relatively small reptile, measuring 95.5–130.5 cm (3.13–4.28 ft) in total body length and weighing 6 kg (13 lb).

<i>Hanosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Hanosaurus is an extinct genus of marine reptiles that existed during the Triassic period in what is now China. The type species is Hanosaurus hupehensis. It was a small animal, with specimens measuring 79.4 cm (31.3 in) long in total body length, which likely fed on soft-bodied prey.

Parahupehsuchus is an extinct genus of hupehsuchian marine reptiles from the Early Triassic of China. The genus is monotypic, known from the single species Parahupehsuchus longus and based on a single specimen. Like other hupehsuchians, it had an elongated torso, a tail nearly as long as the rest of the body, short and paddle-like limbs, extra bones in the fore- and hind limbs, thick ribs and gastralia, neural spines of the vertebrae split into two parts, and bony plates over the neural spines. It differs from other hupehsuchians in having an even more elongated body and wider ribs that touch along their edges and have no spaces between them. The ribs connect with gastralia on the underside of the torso to form a bony "tube" around the body wall.

<i>Cartorhynchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Cartorhynchus is an extinct genus of early ichthyosauriform marine reptile that lived during the Early Triassic epoch, about 248 million years ago. The genus contains a single species, Cartorhynchus lenticarpus, named in 2014 by Ryosuke Motani and colleagues from a single nearly-complete skeleton found near Chaohu, Anhui Province, China. Along with its close relative Sclerocormus, Cartorhynchus was part of a diversification of marine reptiles that occurred suddenly during the Spathian substage, soon after the devastating Permian-Triassic extinction event, but they were subsequently driven to extinction by volcanism and sea level changes by the Middle Triassic.

The Ichthyosauriformes are a group of marine reptiles, belonging to the Ichthyosauromorpha, that lived during the Mesozoic.

Eretmorhipis is an extinct genus of hupehsuchian marine reptiles from the Early Triassic of China. It is currently known from two specimens that were discovered in an exposure of the Jialingjiang Formation in Yuan'an County, Hubei, and referred to the newly named species Eretmorhipis carrolldongi in 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saurosphargidae</span> Extinct family of reptiles

Saurosphargidae is an extinct family of marine reptiles known from the Early Triassic and early Middle Triassic of Europe and China.

<i>Sclerocormus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Sclerocormus is an extinct genus of ichthyosauriform from the early Triassic period. The fossil was discovered in the central Anhui Province, China. It is currently only known from one specimen, however the fossil is mostly complete and as such further increases the understanding of the early evolution of ichthyosaurs.

The Zhuganpo Formation is a Triassic geologic unit found in southern China. It has historically been known as the Zhuganpo Member of the Falang Formation. A diverse fossil assemblage known as the Xingyi biota or Xingyi Fauna can be found in the upper part of the Zhuganpo Formation. Fossils of the Xingyi biota include articulated skeletons of marine reptiles, abundant fish, and a plentiful assortment of invertebrates indicating a Ladinian to Carnian age for the sediments of the formation.

This list of fossil reptiles described in 2014 is a list of new taxa of fossil reptiles that were described during the year 2014, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to reptile paleontology that occurred in 2014.

<i>Luopingosaurus</i> Extinct genus of sauropterygian reptiles

Luopingosaurus is an extinct genus of pachypleurosaurid sauropterygian from the Middle Triassic Guanling Formation of Yunnan Province, China. The genus contains a single species, L. imparilis, known from a well-preserved, nearly complete skeleton.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Chen, X.-H.; Motani, R.; Cheng, L.; Jiang, D.-Y.; Rieppel, O. (2014). Farke, Andrew A. (ed.). "A Small Short-Necked Hupehsuchian from the Lower Triassic of Hubei Province, China". PLOS ONE. 9 (12): e115244. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9k5244C. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115244 . PMC   4269458 . PMID   25517113.
  2. 1 2 Wu, X-C.; Zhao, L-J.; Sato, T.; Gu, S-X.; Jin, X-S. (2015). "A new specimen of Hupehsuchus nanchangensis Young, 1972 (Diapsida, Hupehsuchia) from the Triassic of Hubei, China". Historical Biology. 28 (1–2): 43–52. doi:10.1080/08912963.2015.1013953. S2CID   86178230.
  3. Li, Qiang; Liu, Jun (2020). "An Early Triassic sauropterygian and associated fauna from South China provide insights into Triassic ecosystem health". Communications Biology. 3. 63. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0778-7 . PMC   7012838 .
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Chen, X; Motani, R; Cheng, L; Jiang, D; Rieppel, O (2014). "A carapace-like bony 'body tube' in an Early Triassic marine reptile and early onset of marine tetrapod predation". PLOS ONE. 9 (4): e94396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094396 . PMC   3981804 . PMID   24718682.
  5. Young C-C (1972) Hupehsuchus nanchangensis. In: Young C-C, Dong Z-M, editors. Aquatic reptiles from the Triassic of China. Peking: Academia Sinica. pp. 28–34.
  6. Wang, K (1959). "Ueber eine neue fossile Reptiliform von Provinz Hupeh, China". Acta Palaeontologica Sinica. 7: 367–373.
  7. 1 2 Carroll, R. L.; Dong, Z-m. (1991). "Hupehsuchus, an enigmatic aquatic reptile from the Triassic of China, and the problem of establishing relationships". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 331 (1260): 131–53. Bibcode:1991RSPTB.331..131C. doi:10.1098/rstb.1991.0004.
  8. 1 2 Chen X-h, Motani R; Cheng, L; Jiang D-y, Rieppel O (2015). "A New Specimen of Carroll's Mystery Hupehsuchian from the Lower Triassic of China". PLOS ONE. 10 (5): e0126024. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1026024C. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126024 . PMC   4446317 . PMID   26017585.
  9. Wu, X; Li, Z; Zhou, B; Dong, Z (2003). "A polydactylous amniote from the Triassic period". Nature. 426 (6966): 516. doi: 10.1038/426516a . PMID   14654831.
  10. 1 2 Chen X-h, Motani R; Cheng, L; Jiang D-y, Rieppel O (2014). "The enigmatic marine reptile Nanchangosaurus from the Lower Triassic of Hubei, China and the phylogenetic affinity of Hupehsuchia". PLOS ONE. 9 (7): e102361. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j2361C. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102361 . PMC   4094528 . PMID   25014493.
  11. Motani, Ryosuke; Chen, Xiao-hong; Jiang, Da-yong; Cheng, Long; Tintori, Andrea; Rieppel, Olivier (2015-03-10). "Lunge feeding in early marine reptiles and fast evolution of marine tetrapod feeding guilds". Scientific Reports. 5 (1): 8900. Bibcode:2015NatSR...5E8900M. doi:10.1038/srep08900. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   4354009 . PMID   25754468.
  12. Motani R (2009) The evolution of marine reptiles. Evolution: Education and Outreach 2: 224–235.
  13. 1 2 Chen, C & Chen, X & Cheng, L & Yan, C. (2016). Nanzhang-Yuan'an Fauna, Hubei province and its significance for biotic recovery. Dizhi Xuebao/Acta Geologica Sinica. 90. 409-420.
  14. Li, J; Liu, J; Li, C; Huang, Z (2002). "The horizon and age of the marine reptiles from Hubei Province, China". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 40: 241–244.
  15. Cohen, K.M., Finney, S.C., Gibbard, P.L. & Fan, J.-X. (2013; updated) The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes 36: 199-204.
  16. Song, Huyue; Tong, Jinnan; Algeo, Thomas J.; Horacek, Micha; Qiu, Haiou; Song, Haijun; Tian, Li & Chen, Zhong-Qiang (2013). "Large vertical δ13CDIC gradients in Early Triassic seas of the South China craton: Implications for oceanographic changes related to Siberian Traps volcanism". Global and Planetary Change. 105: 7–20. Bibcode:2013GPC...105....7S. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.023.
  17. Chen, Xiaohong; Sander, P. Martin; Cheng, Long & Wang, Xiaofeng (2013). "A new Triassic primitive ichthyosaur from Yuanan, South China". Acta Geologica Sinica. English Edition. 87 (3): 672–677. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.12078. ISSN   1000-9515.
  18. Young, C-C (1965). "On the new nothosaurs from Hupeh and Kweichou, China". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 9: 315–356.
  19. Young C-C (1972) A thalattosaur from Nanzhang, Hubei. In: Young C-C, Dong Z-M, editors. Aquatic reptiles from the Triassic of China. Peking: Academia Sinica. pp.17–27.
  20. Rieppel, Olivier (1998). "The systematic status of Hanosaurus hupehensis (Reptilia, Sauropterygia) from the Triassic of China". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 18 (3): 545–557. doi:10.1080/02724634.1998.10011082. JSTOR   4523926.