Hippocamp (moon)

Last updated

Hippocamp
Hippocamp-heic1904b.jpg
Composite of Hubble images from 2009 showing Neptune, its rings, and inner moons including Hippocamp (circled) [lower-alpha 1]
Discovery [1]
Discovered by M. R. Showalter
I. de Pater
J. J. Lissauer
R. S. French
Discovery date1 July 2013
Designations
Designation
Neptune XIV
Pronunciation /ˈhɪpəkæmp/ [2]
Named after
 ἱππόκαμπος hippokampos
S/2004 N 1
Adjectives Hippocampian /hɪpəˈkæmpiən/ [3]
Orbital characteristics [4]
Epoch 1 January 2020 (JD 2458849.5)
Earliest precovery date6 November 2004 [5]
105,283  km
Eccentricity 0.00084±0.00032
0.95  d (22.8  h)
329.901°
Inclination 0.0641°±0.0507°(to Neptune's equator) [6]
0.0019° (to local Laplace plane) [4]
110.467°
305.446°
Satellite of Neptune
Physical characteristics
17.4±2.0 km [6]
Mass (1.029–30.87)×1015 kg [4] [lower-alpha 2]
synchronous
Albedo ≈0.09 (assumed) [6]
26.5±0.3 [5]

    Hippocamp, also designated Neptune XIV, is a small moon of Neptune discovered on 1 July 2013. It was found by astronomer Mark Showalter by analyzing archived Neptune photographs the Hubble Space Telescope captured between 2004 and 2009. The moon is so dim that it was not observed when the Voyager 2 space probe flew by Neptune and its moons in 1989. It is about 35 km (20 mi) in diameter, and orbits Neptune in about 23 hours, just under one Earth day. Due to its unusually close distance to Neptune's largest inner moon Proteus, it has been hypothesized that Hippocamp may have accreted from material ejected by an impact on Proteus several billion years ago. The moon was formerly known by its provisional designation S/2004 N 1 until February 2019, when it was formally named Hippocamp, after the mythological sea-horse symbolizing Poseidon in Greek mythology.

    Contents

    History

    Discovery

    Hippocamp was discovered by a team of astronomers led by Mark Showalter of the SETI Institute on 1 July 2013. Showalter was examining archival Hubble Space Telescope images of Neptune from 2009, as part of his study on the ring arcs of Neptune. Since the inner moons and ring arcs of Neptune orbit quickly, Showalter developed and used a technique similar to panning, where multiple short-exposure images are gathered and digitally warped to compensate for orbital motion and to allow stacking of multiple images to bring out faint details. [6] On a whim, Showalter decided to extend his analysis to regions beyond Neptune's ring system; he then found Hippocamp as a faint but unambiguous white dot. [7] [8]

    To confirm the moon, Showalter further analyzed over 150 archival Hubble images going back to 2004. [7] Within a week, Showalter repeatedly found Hippocamp in these images and was able to identify the moon at ten different observation times from 2004 to 2009. [5] [9] Showalter had also checked images from the Voyager 2 spacecraft to find any detections of Hippocamp during its 1989 Neptune flyby, but was unable to identify the moon since it was too dim to be detected by Voyager 2's cameras. Nonetheless, the number of archival Hubble images with Hippocamp was enough to determine the moon's orbit. [7] [5] [8] The discovery of Hippocamp was formally announced in a notice issued by the International Astronomical Union's Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, along with a press release by the Space Telescope Science Institute on 15 July 2013. [5] [7] Given that the relevant images examined by Showalter were available to the public, the discovery could have been made by anyone. [8]

    Naming

    The moon is named after the hippocampus, a mythological creature depicted as having the upper body of a horse with the lower body of a fish in Greek mythology. [10] The hippocampus symbolizes the Greek sea god Poseidon as well as the Roman sea god Neptune. [11] [10] In Roman mythology, Neptune would often drive a sea-chariot pulled by hippocampi. [10]

    Upon the announcement of its discovery, the moon was given the provisional designation S/2004 N 1. The provisional designation indicates that it was the first Neptunian satellite identified in images dating from 2004. [5] Follow-up Hubble observations of Hippocamp were conducted by Showalter in 2016, and the moon was later given its permanent Roman numeral designation by the Minor Planet Center after its recovery. [12] [13] Hippocamp was formally numbered as Neptune XIV (14) on 25 September 2018, though it remained without an official name until February 2019. [13]

    By the International Astronomical Union's (IAU's) nomenclature guidelines, name proposals for Neptune's moons must be based on a figure from Greco-Roman mythology with a relationship to Poseidon or Neptune. [11] [14] Showalter and his team had sought for names since the announcement of their discovery; among the names considered was Polyphemus, the gigantic one-eyed son of Poseidon and Thoosa. [15] Showalter then settled on the name Hippocamp in acknowledgement of the seahorse genus, Hippocampus , mainly for his passion for scuba diving and the animal itself. [16] Showalter's name proposal was approved by the IAU's naming committee on 20 February 2019, and the name was announced in a press release by the Space Telescope Science Institute. [17] [14]

    Origin

    Size comparison of Neptune's seven inner moons Neptune inner moons size comparison.jpg
    Size comparison of Neptune's seven inner moons

    The mass distribution of the Neptunian moons is the most lopsided of the satellite systems of the giant planets in the Solar System. One moon, Triton, makes up nearly all of the mass of the system, with all other moons together comprising only one third of one percent. The reason for the lopsidedness of the present Neptunian system is that Triton was captured from the Kuiper belt well after the formation of Neptune's original satellite system, much of which was destroyed in the process of capture. Triton's orbit upon capture is presumed to have been highly eccentric, which would have caused chaotic perturbations in the orbits of the original inner Neptunian satellites, leading to the ejection of some moons and the collisional destruction of others. [18] [19] At least some of Neptune's present inner satellites are thought to have then accreted from the resulting rubble after Triton's orbit was circularized by tidal deceleration. [20]

    Among these re-accreted moons are Proteus, the largest and outermost of Neptune's present inner moons. Proteus bears a large impact crater named Pharos, which has a diameter around 250 km (160 mi)—more than half the diameter of Proteus itself. This unusually large size of Pharos relative to Proteus implies that the impact event that formed the crater would have nearly disrupted Proteus and ejected a significant amount of debris. [21] [6] The present orbit of Proteus is situated relatively close to that of Hippocamp, which orbits just 12,000 km (7,500 mi) interior of Proteus. Their orbital semi-major axes differ by only ten percent, implying that both had likely originated from the same position in the past. This is further evidenced by accounting for the moons' respective outward orbital migration rates, which also suggests that Hippocamp and Proteus were much closer together in the past. [22] Ordinarily, two adjoining objects of disparate sizes would have either resulted in the smaller object being ejected or colliding with the larger object—this does not appear to be the case for Hippocamp and Proteus. [10] [14]

    Based on this evidence, Showalter and colleagues proposed that Hippocamp may have originated from debris ejected from Proteus by the cometary impact that formed its largest crater, Pharos. In this scenario, Hippocamp would be considered as a third-generation satellite of Neptune, originating from impacts on Neptune's reformed regular moons after the capture of Triton. [10] The regular moons of Neptune are thought to have been disrupted by cometary impacts multiple times, with only Proteus surviving intact despite being nearly disrupted by the Pharos impact event. [18] Some of the debris ejected by the impact settled into a stable orbit 1,000–2,000 km (620–1,240 mi) interior to Proteus, and coalesced into Hippocamp. [6] However, Hippocamp only accounts for two percent of the missing volume of material generated by the Pharos impact event, and the reason for the absence of the rest of the debris remains unknown. [22]

    As with the other small inner moons of Neptune, Hippocamp is thought to have been repeatedly disrupted by comet impacts after it had coalesced from debris ejected from Proteus. Based on the formation rate of large craters on Proteus, Hippocamp is estimated to have been disrupted about nine times in the past 4 billion years, re-accreting back after each disruption event. [23] These disruption events substantially reduce the moon's orbital eccentricity and inclination, providing an explanation for Hippocamp's present circular orbit despite its proximity to Proteus. Hippocamp had also likely lost some of its mass during these disruption events, possibly accounting for some of the missing volume of material ejected from the Pharos impact event. [16] Proteus has since receded over 11,000 km (6,800 mi) from Neptune owing to tidal interactions with the planet, while Hippocamp remained close to its initial position where it formed as it migrates more slowly due to its smaller size. [6]

    Physical characteristics

    Artist's impression of Neptune and Hippocamp Neptune and its smallest moon Hippocamp (artist's impression).jpg
    Artist's impression of Neptune and Hippocamp

    Hippocamp is the second-smallest known moon of Neptune, with a diameter estimated at 34.8 km (21.6 mi). It is about 1,000 times less massive and 4,000 times less voluminous than its hypothesized progenitor, Proteus. [6] [14] Based on Hippocamp's estimated apparent magnitude of 26.5, its diameter was initially thought to be around 16–20 km (10–12 mi), but more recent observations revise this value upward two-fold. [5] [6] Nevertheless, it remains by a wide margin the smallest of Neptune's inner, regular, satellites. [22]

    The surface properties of Hippocamp are unknown as it was not extensively studied through different wavelengths of light, particularly in the near-infrared spectrum. Hippocamp is assumed to resemble Neptune's other inner satellites in having a dark surface. Their geometrical albedos range from 0.07 to 0.10, with the average being about 0.09. [6] [24] The Hubble Space Telescope's NICMOS instrument has examined Neptune's large inner moons in the near-infrared, and has found evidence that similar dark, reddish material, characteristic of small outer Solar System bodies, appears to be present on all their surfaces. The data is consistent with organic compounds containing C−H and/or C≡N bonds, but spectral resolution was inadequate to identify the molecules. [25] Water ice, abundant in the outer Solar System, is believed to be present, but its spectral signature could not be observed (unlike the case of small Uranian moons). [26]

    Orbit

    Diagram of the orbits of Neptune's moons out to Triton, with Hippocamp's orbit highlighted Orbits of inner moons of Neptune including S 2004 N 1.jpg
    Diagram of the orbits of Neptune's moons out to Triton, with Hippocamp's orbit highlighted

    Hippocamp completes one revolution around Neptune every 22 hours and 48 minutes (0.95 days), corresponding to a semi-major axis, or orbital distance of 105,283 km (65,420 mi). [5] For comparison, this distance is approximately 4.3 Neptune radii, or just over a quarter of the Earth–Moon distance. [lower-alpha 3] Both its inclination and eccentricity are close to zero. [6] It orbits between Larissa and Proteus, making it the second outermost of Neptune's regular satellites. Its small size at this location runs counter to a trend among the other regular Neptunian satellites of increasing diameter with increasing distance from the primary. [6]

    Being situated at a relatively close distance to the much larger Proteus, Hippocamp is subjected to its significant gravitational influence. [6] Its orbit is particularly sensitive to the mass of Proteus; orbital solutions using a variety of assumed masses for Proteus show that Hippocamp displays a significant in-orbit difference of around 100 km (62 mi). This can allow for an estimate of the mass of Proteus by observing its influence on Hippocamp's orbit for over a period of several decades. [4]

    Proteus and Hippocamp are nearly in a 11:13 mean-motion resonance, which may be the reason for Hippocamp's sensitivity to the mass of Proteus. [4] Both moons are outside the Neptune-synchronous orbit (Neptune's rotational period is 0.67 days or 16.1 hours) and are thus being tidally accelerated by Neptune and are migrating outward. [28] Compared to Hippocamp, Proteus migrates at a faster rate due to its higher mass and thus stronger tidal interaction with Neptune. Based on its orbital migration rate, Proteus is estimated to recede about 40 km (25 mi) from Neptune in 18 million years, in which it will enter a true 11:13 resonance with Hippocamp. [4] Additionally, the present orbital periods of Larissa and Hippocamp are within about one percent of a 3:5 orbital resonance. [lower-alpha 4]

    See also

    Notes

    1. ↑ The relative brightness of the moons is exaggerated in this composite of high and low exposure images. The color image of Neptune was taken separately by Hubble in August 2009.
    2. ↑ Mass range for assumed densities of 0.05–1.50 g/cm3. [4]
    3. ↑ Given Neptune’s radius of 24,600 km [4] and the Moon's semi-major axis of 384,400 km. [27]
    4. ↑ Given the moons' respective periods of 0.55465 and 0.95 days, the actual ratios are 2.92:5.00. [27]

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Nereid (moon)</span> Moon of Neptune

    Nereid, or Neptune II, is the third-largest moon of Neptune. It has the most eccentric orbit of all known moons in the Solar System. It was the second moon of Neptune to be discovered, by Gerard Kuiper in 1949.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Naiad (moon)</span> Moon of Neptune

    Naiad, named after the naiads of Greek legend, is the innermost satellite of Neptune and the nearest to the center of any gas giant with moons with a distance of 48,224 km from the planet's center. Its orbital period is less than a Neptunian day, resulting in tidal dissipation that will cause its orbit to decay. Eventually it will either crash into Neptune's atmosphere or break up to become a new ring.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Triton (moon)</span> Largest moon of Neptune

    Triton is the largest natural satellite of the planet Neptune. It is the only moon of Neptune massive enough to be rounded under its own gravity and hosts a thin but well-structured atmosphere. Triton orbits Neptune in a retrograde orbit— revolving in the opposite direction to the parent planet's rotation — the only large moon in the Solar System to do so. Triton is thought to have once been a dwarf planet from the Kuiper belt, captured into Neptune's orbit by the latter's gravity.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Puck (moon)</span> Moon of Uranus

    Puck is the sixth-largest moon of Uranus. It was discovered in December 1985 by the Voyager 2 spacecraft. The name Puck follows the convention of naming Uranus's moons after characters from Shakespeare. The orbit of Puck lies between the rings of Uranus and the first of Uranus's large moons, Miranda. Puck is approximately spherical in shape and has diameter of about 162 km. It has a dark, heavily cratered surface, which shows spectral signs of water ice.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Proteus (moon)</span> Large moon of Neptune

    Proteus, also known as Neptune VIII, is the second-largest Neptunian moon, and Neptune's largest inner satellite. Discovered by Voyager 2 in 1989, it is named after Proteus, the shape-changing sea god of Greek mythology. Proteus orbits Neptune in a nearly equatorial orbit at a distance of about 4.75 times the radius of Neptune's equator.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Larissa (moon)</span> Moon of Neptune

    Larissa, also known as Neptune VII, is the fifth-closest inner satellite of Neptune. It is named after Larissa, a lover of Poseidon.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Portia (moon)</span> Moon of Uranus

    Portia is an inner satellite of Uranus. It was discovered from the images taken by Voyager 2 on 3 January 1986, and was given the temporary designation S/1986 U 1. The moon is named after Portia, the heroine of William Shakespeare's play The Merchant of Venice. It is also designated Uranus XII.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Thalassa (moon)</span> Moon of Neptune

    Thalassa, also known as Neptune IV, is the second-innermost satellite of Neptune. Thalassa was named after sea goddess Thalassa, a daughter of Aether and Hemera from Greek mythology. "Thalassa" is also the Greek word for "sea".

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Despina (moon)</span> Moon of Neptune

    Despina, also known as Neptune V, is the third-closest inner moon of Neptune. It is named after Greek mythological character Despoina, a nymph who was a daughter of Poseidon and Demeter.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Galatea (moon)</span> Moon of Neptune

    Galatea, also known as Neptune VI, is the fourth-closest inner moon of Neptune. It is named after Galatea, one of the fifty Nereids of Greek legend, with whom Cyclops Polyphemus was vainly in love.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Perdita (moon)</span> Moon of Uranus

    Perdita is an inner satellite of Uranus. Perdita's discovery was very complicated, as the first photographs of Perdita were taken by the Voyager 2 spacecraft in 1986, but it was not recognized from the photographs for more than a decade. In 1999, the moon was noticed by Erich Karkoschka and reported. But because no further pictures could be taken to confirm its existence, it was officially demoted in 2001. However, in 2003, pictures taken by the Hubble Space Telescope managed to pick up an object where Perdita was supposed to be, finally confirming its existence.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Moons of Uranus</span> Natural satellites of the planet Uranus

    Uranus, the seventh planet of the Solar System, has 28 confirmed moons. Most of them are named after characters that appear in, or are mentioned in, the works of William Shakespeare and Alexander Pope. Uranus's moons are divided into three groups: thirteen inner moons, five major moons, and ten irregular moons. The inner and major moons all have prograde orbits and are cumulatively classified as regular moons. In contrast, the orbits of the irregular moons are distant, highly inclined, and mostly retrograde.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Moons of Neptune</span> Natural satellites of the planet Neptune

    The planet Neptune has 16 known moons, which are named for minor water deities and a water creature in Greek mythology. By far the largest of them is Triton, discovered by William Lassell on 10 October 1846, 17 days after the discovery of Neptune itself. Over a century passed before the discovery of the second natural satellite, Nereid, in 1949, and another 40 years passed before Proteus, Neptune's second-largest moon, was discovered in 1989.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Rings of Neptune</span> Rings of the planet Neptune

    The rings of Neptune consist primarily of five principal rings. They were first discovered by simultaneous observations of a stellar occultation on 22 July 1984 by André Brahic's and William B. Hubbard's teams at La Silla Observatory (ESO) and at Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory in Chile. They were eventually imaged in 1989 by the Voyager 2 spacecraft. At their densest, they are comparable to the less dense portions of Saturn's main rings such as the C ring and the Cassini Division, but much of Neptune's ring system is quite faint and dusty, in some aspects more closely resembling the rings of Jupiter. Neptune's rings are named after astronomers who contributed important work on the planet: Galle, Le Verrier, Lassell, Arago, and Adams. Neptune also has a faint unnamed ring coincident with the orbit of the moon Galatea. Three other moons orbit between the rings: Naiad, Thalassa and Despina.

    In astronomy, an inner moon or inner natural satellite is a natural satellite following a prograde, low-inclination orbit inwards of the large satellites of the parent planet. They are generally thought to have been formed in situ at the same time as the coalescence of the original planet. Neptune's moons are an exception, as they are likely reaggregates of the pieces of the original bodies, which were disrupted after the capture of the large moon Triton. Inner satellites are distinguished from other regular satellites by their proximity to the parent planet, their short orbital periods, their low mass, small size, and irregular shapes.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Exploration of Neptune</span> Overview of the exploration of Neptune

    Neptune has been directly explored by one space probe, Voyager 2, in 1989. As of 2024, there are no confirmed future missions to visit the Neptunian system, although a tentative Chinese mission has been planned for launch in 2024. NASA, ESA, and independent academic groups have proposed future scientific missions to visit Neptune. Some mission plans are still active, while others have been abandoned or put on hold.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Vanth (moon)</span> Moon of Orcus

    Vanth is a natural satellite or moon of the large trans-Neptunian dwarf planet Orcus. It was discovered by Michael Brown and Terry-Ann Suer using images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope on 13 November 2005. The moon has a diameter of 443 km (275 mi), making it about half the size of Orcus and the third-largest moon of a trans-Neptunian object. Vanth is massive enough that it shifts the barycenter of the Orcus–Vanth system outside of Orcus, forming a binary system in which the two bodies revolve around the barycenter, much like the Pluto–Charon system. It is hypothesized that both systems formed similarly, most likely by a giant impact early in the Solar System's history. In contrast to Orcus, Vanth has a darker and slightly redder surface that apparently lacks exposed water ice, resembling primordial Kuiper belt objects.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Weywot</span> Moon of dwarf planet Quaoar

    Weywot is a natural satellite or moon of the trans-Neptunian dwarf planet Quaoar. It was discovered by Michael Brown and Terry-Ann Suer using images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope on 14 February 2006. Named after the Tongva sky god and son of Quaoar, Weywot is thought to be a fragment of Quaoar that was ejected into an eccentric orbit around the dwarf planet by a major impact event billions of years ago. The moon is nearly 200 km (120 mi) in diameter and it orbits Quaoar every 12.4 days at an average distance of 13,300 km (8,300 mi). Weywot is thought to play a role in maintaining Quaoar's outer ring by gravitationally influencing it in an orbital resonance.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark R. Showalter</span> American astronomer

    Mark Robert Showalter is a senior research scientist at the SETI Institute. He is the discoverer of six moons and three planetary rings. He is the Principal Investigator of NASA's Planetary Data System Rings Node, a co-investigator on the Cassini–Huygens mission to Saturn, and works closely with the New Horizons mission to Pluto.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Pharos (crater)</span> Crater on Proteus

    Pharos is the largest known impact crater on Neptune's moon Proteus. It is named after the island of Pharos, making it the only named surface feature on Proteus as of 2024. It measures 10–15 km deep and has a diameter of around 250 km (160 mi), making it more than half the diameter of Proteus itself. Debris ejected from the impact that created Pharos may have formed Hippocamp, a small moon whose orbit is unusually close to Proteus's.

    References

    1. ↑ "Planetary Satellite Discovery Circumstances". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 28 October 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
    2. ↑ "Hippocamp". Lexico UK English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020.
    3. ↑ Anon. (1899) "Invocation to Neptune", Poems, New York, p. 84
    4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Brozović, M.; Showalter, M. R.; Jacobson, R. A.; French, R. S.; Lissauer, J. J.; de Pater, I. (March 2020). "Orbits and resonances of the regular moons of Neptune". Icarus. 338 (113462): 113462. arXiv: 1910.13612 . Bibcode:2020Icar..33813462B. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113462. S2CID   204960799.
    5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Showalter, M. R.; De Pater, I.; Lissauer, J. J.; French, R. S. (15 July 2013). "New Satellite of Neptune: S/2004 N 1" (PDF). Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams. 3586. International Astronomical Union: 1. Bibcode:2013CBET.3586....1S . Retrieved 21 June 2020.
    6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Showalter, M. R.; de Pater, I.; Lissauer, J. J.; French, R. S. (February 2019). "The seventh inner moon of Neptune". Nature. 566 (7744): 350–353. Bibcode:2019Natur.566..350S. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0909-9. PMC   6424524 . PMID   30787452.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
    7. 1 2 3 4 "Hubble Finds New Neptune Moon". HubbleSite. Space Telescope Science Institute. 15 July 2013. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
    8. 1 2 3 Beatty, Kelly (15 July 2013). "Neptune's Newest Moon". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved 12 June 2017.
    9. ↑ Showalter, Mark (15 July 2013). "How to Photograph a Racehorse ...and how this relates to a tiny moon of Neptune". Cosmic Diary. Retrieved 16 July 2013.
    10. 1 2 3 4 5 "Hubble helps uncover origin of Neptune's smallest moon Hippocamp". Spacetelescope.org. European Space Agency. 20 February 2019. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
    11. 1 2 "Planet and Satellite Names and Discoverers". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. USGS Astrogeology Science Center. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    12. ↑ Showalter, Mark (October 2015). "Neptune's Evolving Inner Moons and Ring-Arcs". Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes. Space Telescope Science Institute: 14217. Bibcode:2015hst..prop14217S . Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    13. 1 2 "M.P.C. 111804" (PDF). Minor Planet Circular. Minor Planet Center. 25 September 2018. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    14. 1 2 3 4 "Tiny Neptune Moon Spotted by Hubble May Have Broken from Larger Moon". HubbleSite. Space Telescope Science Institute. 20 February 2019. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    15. ↑ Billings, Lee (18 July 2013). "Neptune's New Moon May Be Named after One of Sea God's Monstrous Children". Scientific American. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    16. 1 2 Beatty, Kelly (20 February 2019). "Meet Hippocamp, Neptune's Smallest Moon". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    17. ↑ "Name Approved for Neptunian Satellite: Hippocamp". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. USGS Astrogeology Science Center. 20 February 2019. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    18. 1 2 Goldreich, P.; Murray, N.; Longaretti, P. Y.; Banfield, D. (August 1989). "Neptune's Story". Science. 245 (4917): 500–504. Bibcode:1989Sci...245..500G. doi:10.1126/science.245.4917.500. PMID   17750259. S2CID   34095237.
    19. ↑ Agnor, Craig B.; Hamilton, Douglas P. (May 2006). "Neptune's capture of its moon Triton in a binary–planet gravitational encounter". Nature. 441 (7090): 192–194. Bibcode:2006Natur.441..192A. doi:10.1038/nature04792. PMID   16688170. S2CID   4420518.
    20. ↑ Banfield, Don; Murray, Norm (October 1992). "A dynamical history of the inner Neptunian satellites". Icarus. 99 (2): 390–401. Bibcode:1992Icar...99..390B. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90155-Z.
    21. ↑ Croft, Steven K. (October 1992). "Proteus: Geology, shape, and catastrophic destruction". Icarus. 99 (2): 402–419. Bibcode:1992Icar...99..402C. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90156-2.
    22. 1 2 3 Verbiscer, Anne J. (20 February 2019). "A new moon for Neptune". Nature. 566 (7744): 328–329. Bibcode:2019Natur.566..328V. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00576-1 . PMID   30787456.
    23. ↑ Haynes, Korey (20 February 2019). "Meet Neptune's new moon, Hippocamp". Astronomy Magazine. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    24. ↑ Karkoschka, Erich (April 2003). "Sizes, shapes, and albedos of the inner satellites of Neptune". Icarus. 162 (2): 400–407. Bibcode:2003Icar..162..400K. doi:10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00002-2.
    25. ↑ Dumas, C.; Terrile, R. J.; Smith, B. A.; Schneider, G. (March 2002). "Astrometry and Near-Infrared Photometry of Neptune's Inner Satellites and Ring Arcs". The Astronomical Journal. 123 (3): 1776–1783. Bibcode:2002AJ....123.1776D. doi: 10.1086/339022 . ISSN   0004-6256.
    26. ↑ Dumas, C.; Smith, B. A.; Terrile, R. J. (August 2003). "Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS Multiband Photometry of Proteus and Puck". The Astronomical Journal. 126 (2): 1080–1085. Bibcode:2003AJ....126.1080D. doi:10.1086/375909. ISSN   0004-6256. S2CID   122085744.
    27. 1 2 "Planetary Satellite Mean Orbital Parameters". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 17 July 2020. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
    28. ↑ Zhang, K.; Hamilton, D. P. (January 2008). "Orbital resonances in the inner neptunian system: II. Resonant history of Proteus, Larissa, Galatea, and Despina". Icarus. 193 (1): 267–282. Bibcode:2008Icar..193..267Z. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.08.024. ISSN   0019-1035.
    This page is based on this Wikipedia article
    Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
    Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.