The Landless Workers' Movement (Portuguese: Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra, MST) is a social movement in Brazil aimed at land reform. Inspired by Marxism,[1] it is the largest such movement[2] in Latin America, with an estimated informal membership of 1.5 million[3] across 23 of Brazil's 26 states.[4]
MST defines its goals as access to the land for poor workers through land reform in Brazil, and activism around social issues that make land ownership more difficult to achieve, such as unequal income distribution, racism, sexism, and media monopolies.[5] MST strives to achieve a self-sustainable way of life for the rural poor.[6]
The MST differs from previous land reform movements in its single-issue focus; land reform for them is a self-justifying cause. The organization maintains that it is legally justified in occupying unproductive land, pointing to the most recent[when?]Constitution of Brazil (1988), which contains a passage saying that land must fulfill a social function (Article 5, XXIII). The MST also notes, based on 1996 census statistics, that a mere 3% of the population owns two-thirds of all arable land in Brazil.[7]
In 1991, MST received the Right Livelihood Award "for winning land for landless families, and helping them to farm it sustainably."[8]
Land reform before the 1988 Constitution
Land reform has a long history in Brazil, and the concept predates the MST. In the mid-20th century, Brazilian leftists reached a consensus that the democratization and widespread actual exercise of political rights would require land reform.[9] Brazilian political elites actively opposed land reform initiatives, which they felt threatened their social and political status.[10] Political leaders of the rural poor then attempted to achieve land reform from below, through grassroots action. MST broke new ground by tackling land reform itself, by "breaking...dependent relations with parties, governments, and other institutions,"[11] and framing the issue in purely political terms, rather than social, ethical, or religious ones.
The first statute to regulate land ownership in Brazil after its independence, Law 601 or Lei de Terras (Landed Property Act), took effect September 18, 1850. A colonial administration, based on Portuguese feudal law, had previously considered property ownership to stem from royal grants (sesmarias), and were passed through primogeniture (morgadio). In the independent Brazilian state, the default means of acquiring land was through purchase, from either the state or a previous private owner. This law strongly limited squatter's rights, and favoured the historic concentration of land ownership, which became a hallmark of modern Brazilian social history.[12] The Lei de Terras left in place the colonial practice of favoring of large landholdings created by mammoth land grants to well-placed people, which were usually worked by enslaved people.[13]
Continuing the policy favored economies of scale, given the limited number of landowners, but simultaneously made it difficult for small planters and peasants to obtain the land needed to practice subsistence agriculture and small-scale farming.[14]
The consolidation of land ownership into just a few hands had ties to the advent of capitalism in Brazil, and opposition and insurrection in the 19th and early 20th century (for example, the Canudos War in the 1890s, and the Contestado War in the 1910s) idealized older forms of property,[which?] and revitalized ideologies[15] centered on a fabled millenarian return to an earlier, pre-bourgeois social order. Advocated by groups led by rogue messianic religious leaders outside the established Catholic hierarchy, these ideologies seemed heretical and revolutionary.[16] Some leftist historians, following the tracks of the groundbreaking 1963 work by journalist Rui Facó[pt; fr] (Cangaceiros e Fanáticos[17]), tend to conflate early 20th-century banditry in northeastern Brazil (cangaço) with messianism as a kind of social banditry, a protest against such social inequalities as the uneven distribution of land assets.[18][19] This theory developed independently in English-speaking academia around Eric Hobsbawn's 1959 work Primitive Rebels. It was criticized for its unspecific definition of "social movement," but also praised for melding political and religious movements, previously separately examined.[20] This blend was later the basis for the MST's emergence.
Both messianism and cangaço disappeared in the late 1930s, but in the 1940s and '50s, additional peasant resistance broke out to evictions and land grabbing by powerful ranchers:
These local affairs, however, were repressed or settled locally, and did not give rise to an ideology. Policy makers and scholars across the political spectrum believed that it was an objective economic necessity to permit the end of Brazilian rural society through mechanized agrobusiness and forced urbanization. The left, in particular, felt that the technologically backward, feudal latifundia impeded both economic modernization and democratization.[22]
During the 1960s, various groups attempted land reform through the legal system, beginning with the peasant leagues (Ligas Camponesas) in northeastern Brazil,[23] which opposed the evictions of tenant farmers land, and the transformation of plantations into cattle ranches.[24] These groups questioned the existing distribution of land ownership through a rational appeal to the social function of property.[clarification needed]
Despite the efforts of these groups, land ownership continued to concentrate, and Brazil to this day has had a highly dynamic and robust agricultural business sector at the price of extensive dislocation of the rural poor.[25] MST questioned the scope of the benefits from the alleged efficiency of the change, given that since 1850, Brazilian land development had been concerned with the interests of a single class — the rural bourgeoisie.[26] While the MST frames its policies in socio-economic terms, it still points to Canudos and its alleged millenarism[27] to legitimize its existence,[28] and to develop a powerful mystique of its own.[29]
A great deal of the early organizing in the MST came from Catholic communities.[30] Much of MST ideology and practice come from a social doctrine of the Catholic Church: that private property should serve a social function.[31] This principle developed during the 19th century,[32] and became Catholic doctrine with Pope Leo XIII's Rerum novarum encyclical,[33] promulgated on the eve of the 1964 military coup (golpe militar). This doctrine was evoked by President João Goulart at a rally in Rio de Janeiro, at which he offered a blueprint for political and social reforms, and proposed expropriation of estates larger than 600 hectares in areas near federal facilities, such as roads, railroads, reservoirs, and sanitation works; these ideas triggered a strong conservative backlash, and led to Goulart's loss of power.[34] Nevertheless, the Brazilian Catholic hierarchy formally acknowledged the principle in 1980.[35][36]
In Brazilian constitutional history, land reform — understood in terms of public management of natural resources[37] — was first explicitly mentioned as a guiding principle of government in the 1967 constitution,[38] which sought to institutionalize an authoritarian consensus after the 1964 coup. The military dictatorship intended to use land reform policy to develop a buffer of conservative small farmers between latifundia owners and the rural proletariat.[39] In 1969, at the most repressive point of the dictatorship, the 1967 constitution was amended via a decree (ato institucional) by a junta that held interim power during the final illness of president Arthur da Costa e Silva, and authorized government compensation for property expropriated for land reform. This compensation would be made in government bonds rather than cash, previously the only legal practice (Art. 157, §1, as amended by Institutional Act No. 9, 1969).[40]
Land reform and the 1988 Constitution
The Constitution passed in 1988 required that "property shall serve its social function,"[41] and that the government should "expropriate for the purpose of agrarian reform, rural property that is not performing its social function."[42]
Under Article 186 of the Constitution, a social function is performed when rural property simultaneously meets the following requirements:
Rational and adequate use.
Adequate use of available natural resources, and preservation of the environment.
Compliance with the provisions which regulate labor relations.
Development uses which favor the well-being of owners and workers.
Since the criteria are vague and not objectively defined, the social interest principle was seen as a mixed blessing,[who?] but accepted in general. Landowners have lobbied against the principle since 1985 through the landowners' organization, União Democrática Ruralista (Democratic Union of Rural People, or UDR), whose rise and organization parallels that of the MST. Although it avowedly dissolved itself in the early 1990s, some believe it persists in informal regional ties between landowners.[43] UDR lobbying over the constitutional text is believed[who?] to have watered down concrete enforcement of the "social interest" principle.[44]
One Brazilian law handbook argues that land reform, as understood in the 1988 Constitution, is a concept made up of various "compromises," on which constitutional law has consistently evaded taking a clear stance, and so one could argue either for or against the MST without leaving the framework of the Constitution.[45] The lack of clear government commitment to land reform precludes the MST engaging in public-interest litigation,[46] so concrete proceedings for land reform are left to the initiative of the groups concerned, through onerous and time-consuming legal proceedings. Given "the highly problematic and ideologically driven nature of the Brazilian justice system,"[47] all parties have an incentive to resort to more informal methods: "while the large landowners try to evacuate squatters from their land, squatters might use violence to force institutional intervention favoring them with the land expropriation afterwards [...] violence is mandatory for both sides to achieve their goals."[48] These tactics raise controversy about the legality of the MST's actions, since it tries to ensure social justice unilaterally.[49]
The MST identifies rural land it believes to be unproductive and that does not meet its social function, then occupies the land,[50] only afterwards moving to ascertain the legality of the occupation. The MST is represented in these activities by public interest legal counsel, including their own lawyers, sons and daughters of MST families, and organizations, such as Terra de Direitos, a human rights organization co-founded by Darci Frigo, the 2001 Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Human Rights Award Laureate.[51] The courts might eventually issue a warrant for eviction, requiring the occupier families to leave, or they might deny the landowner's petition, and allow the families to stay provisionally, and engage in subsistence farming until the federal agency responsible for agrarian reform, Brazil's National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform (INCRA), determines whether occupied property had indeed been unproductive. The MST's legal activity bases itself on the idea that property rights are in a continuous process of social construction, so litigation and seeking to strike sympathy among the judiciary is essential to MST's legitimacy.[52]
Traditionally, Brazilian courts side with landowners, and file charges against MST members some call "frivolous and bizarre."[53] For instance, in a 2004 land occupation in Pernambuco, a judge issued arrest warrants for MST members, and described them as highly dangerous criminals.[54] Nevertheless, many individual judges have shown themselves sympathetic.[55] Brazilian higher courts have usually regarded the MST with reserve: in February 2009, for instance, the then-president of the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF), Gilmar Mendes, declared the MST engaged in "illicit" activities, opposed granting it public monies, and supported an "adequate" judicial response towards land occupation.[56] The MST leadership has, in turn on various occasions, charged that the STF as a whole is consistently hostile to the movement. In late 2013, it described the court as "lackeying to the ruling class," and "working for years against the working class and social movements."[57] This fraught relationship came to a head on February 12, 2014, when a court session was suspended after an attempted invasion of the court building in Brasília by MST activists, who were met by police firing rubber bullets and tear gas.[58]
The smashing of the peasant leagues following the 1964 coup opened the way for commercialized agriculture and concentration of land ownership throughout the period of the military dictatorship, and an absolute decline in the rural population during the 1970s.[59] In the mid-1980s, out of 370 million hectares of total farm land, 285 million hectares (77%) were held by latifundia.[60] The re-democratization process in the 1980s, however, allowed grassroots movements to pursue their own interests,[61] rather than those of the state and the ruling classes. The emergence of the MST fits into this framework.
Between late 1980 and early 1981, over 6,000 landless families established an encampment on land located between three unproductive estates in Brazil's southernmost state of Rio Grande do Sul. These families included 600 households expropriated and dislocated in 1974 from nearby Passo Real[pt] to make way for construction of a hydroelectric dam.[62] This first group was later joined by an additional 300 (or, according to other sources, over 1,000) households evicted by FUNAI[who?] from the Kaingang Indian reservation in Nonoai, where they had been renting plots since 1968.[63][bettersourceneeded] Local mobilization of the Passo Real and Nonoai people had already achieved some land distribution on non-Indian land, followed by demobilization. Those who had not received land under these claims, joined by others, and led by leaders from the existing regional movement, MASTER (Rio Grande do Sul landless farmers' movement), made up the 1980/1981 encampment.[64] The location became known as the Encruzilhada Natalino. With the support of civil society, including the progressive branch of the Catholic Church, the families resisted a blockade imposed by military force. Enforcement of the blockade was entrusted by the government to Army colonel Sebastião Curió[pt], already notorious for his past counter-insurgency efforts against the Araguaia guerrillas.
Curió enforced the blockade ruthlessly;[65] most of the landless refused his offer of resettlement on the Amazonian frontier, and eventually pressured the military government into expropriating nearby lands for agrarian reform.[66] The Encruzilhada Natalino episode set a pattern. Most of subsequent early development of the MST concerned exactly the areas of southern Brazil where, in the absence of an open frontier, an ideological appeal at an alternate foundation for access to the land—other than formal private property—was developed in response to the growing difficulties agribusiness posed for family farming.[67] The MST also developed what became its chief modus operandi: local organizing around the concrete struggles of a specific demographic group.[68]
The MST was officially founded in January 1984, during a National Encounter of landless workers in Cascavel, Paraná,[69] as Brazil's military dictatorship drew to a close. Its founding was strongly connected to Catholic-based organizations, such as the Pastoral Land Commission, which provided support and infrastructure.[70]
During much of the 1980s, the MST faced political competition from the National Confederacy of Agrarian Workers' (CONTAG), heir to the peasant leagues of the 1960s, who sought land reform strictly through legal means, by favoring trade unionism, and striving to wrestle concessions from bosses for rural workers. But the more aggressive tactics of the MST in striving for access to land gave a political legitimacy that soon outshone CONTAG, which limited itself to trade-unionism in the strictest sense, acting until today as a rural branch of the Central Única dos Trabalhadores (CUT).[71] MST eventually all but monopolized political attention as a spokesman for rural workers.[72]
From the 1980s on, the MST has not maintained a monopoly of land occupations, many of which are carried out by a host of grassroots organizations (dissidents from the MST, trade unions, informal coalitions of land workers). However, the MST is by far the most organized group dealing in occupations, and has enough political leverage to turn occupations into formal expropriations for public purposes. In 1995, only 89 of 198 occupations (45%) were organized by the MST, but these included 20,500 (65%) out of the grand total of 31,400 families involved.[73]
1995–2005 Cardoso government
Brazil has long history of violent land conflict. During the 1990s, the MST emerged as the most prominent land reform movement in Brazil, and in 1995–1999, led a first wave of occupations[74] which resulted in violence. The MST, landowners, and the government accused each other of the killings, maimings, and property damage.
In the notorious Eldorado de Carajás massacre in 1996, nineteen MST members were gunned down, and another 69 were wounded by police as they blocked a state road in Pará.[75] In 1997 alone, similar confrontations with police and landowners' security details accounted for two dozen internationally acknowledged deaths.[76]
In 2002, the MST occupied the family farm of then-president Fernando Henrique Cardoso[77] in Minas Gerais, a move publicly condemned by Lula, then-leader of the leftist opposition,[78] and other prominent members of the PT.[79][80] The farm was damaged and looted in the occupation, and a combine harvester, tractor, and several pieces of furniture were destroyed.[81] MST members also drank all the alcohol at the farm. Later, 16 MST leaders were charged with theft, vandalism, trespassing, kidnapping, and resisting arrest.[82]
In 2005, two undercover police officers investigating cargo truck robberies near an MST homestead in Pernambuco were attacked. One was shot dead, and the other tortured; MST was suspected to be involved.[83]
Throughout the early 2000s, the MST occupied functioning facilities owned by large corporations, whose activities it considered at odds with the social function of property. On March 8, 2005, the MST invaded a nursery and a research center in Barra do Ribeiro, 56km (34.8 mi) from Porto Alegre, both owned by Aracruz Celulose. The MST members held local guards captive while they ripped plants from the ground. MST president João Pedro Stédile commented that MST should oppose not only landowners, but also agrobusinesses that partook in "the project of organization of agriculture by transnational capital allied to capitalist farming"—a model he deemed socially backwards and environmentally harmful.[84] In the words of an anonymous activist: "our struggle is not only to win the land... we are building a new way of life."[85] The shift had been developing since the movement's 2000 national congress, which focused mainly on the perceived threat of transnational corporations, whether Brazilian or foreign, to both small property in general, and to Brazilian national food sovereignty,[86] especially in the area of intellectual property.[87] In July 2000, this principle was the impetus for MST to mobilize and lead farmers in an attack against a ship loaded with GM maize from Argentina that was docked in Recife.[88] Since 2000, much of the movement's activism consisted in symbolic acts in opposition of multinational corporations, as "a symbol of the intervention politics of the big monopolies operating in Brazil."[89]
A possible reason contributing to the change in strategy might have been the perceived shift in government stances in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The Cardoso government declared that Brazil "had no need" for land reform, that small farms were not competitive, and were unlikely to increase personal incomes in rural areas.[90] He believed that it would be better to create skilled jobs, which would cause the land reform issue to recede into the background.[91] Cardoso denounced the MST's actions as aiming for a return to an archaic, agrarian past, and therefore, in conflict with "modernity"—"one of the enabling myths of the neoliberal discourse."[92]
Cardoso offered lip service to agrarian reform in general, but also described the movement as "a threat to democracy."[93] He compared the MST's demands for subsidized credit, which led to the 1998 occupation of various banks in Paraná, to bank robbery.[94] In a memoir written after he left office, Cardoso expressed sympathy for land reform, stating, "were I not President, I would probably be out marching with them," but also countering, "the image of mobs taking over privately-owned farms would chase away investment, both local and foreign."[95] Although Cardoso himself never branded the MST as terrorists, his Minister of Agricultural Development did, and even hypothesized that the MST invaded Argentina from the north in order to blackmail the Brazilian government into action.[96] In July 1997, Senior General Alberto Cardoso,[97] Cardoso's Chief of Military Household (Chefe da Casa Militar, among other things, a general comptroller over all issues regarding the military and police forces as armed civil servants), expressed concern about participation of MST activists in the then-ongoing police officers' strikes, as a plot to "destabilize" the military.[98]
In terms of concrete measures, Cardoso's government's approach to land reform was divided: while the administration simultaneously acquired land for settlement and increased taxes on unused land, it also forbade public inspection of invaded land—thereby precluding future expropriation, and the disbursement of public funds to people involved in such invasions.[99] Cardoso's main land reform project, supported by a World Bank US$90 million loan, was addressed to individuals who had experience in farming, and a yearly income of up to US$15,000; they were granted a loan of up to US$40,000 if they could associate with other rural producers in order to buy land from a willing landholder.[100] Thus, this programme catered primarily to substantial small farmers, not to the MST's traditional constituency—the rural poor. Cardoso's project, Cédula da Terra ("landcard"), did offer previously landless people the opportunity to buy land from landowners, but in a negotiated process.[101]
In the words of an American scholar, despite its efforts in resettlement, the Cardoso government did not confront the prevailing mode of agricultural production: concentrated, mechanized, latifundia-friendly commodity production—and the resulting injustices.[102] In his own words, what Cardoso could not accept about the MST was what he saw not as a struggle for land reform, but a wider struggle against the capitalist system.[103] Therefore, Cardoso's administration tried to initiate tamer social movements for land reform on purely negotiated terms, such as the Movement of Landless Producers (Movimento dos Agricultores Sem Terra, or MAST), organized on a local basis in the São Paulo State, around the trade union central Syndical Social Democracy (SDS).[104]
By contrast, MST leaders emphasized that their practical activity was a response to the poverty of so many people who had little prospects of productive, continuous work in conventional labor markets. This reality was admitted by President Cardoso in a 1996 interview: "I'm not going to say that my government will be of the excluded, for that it cannot be... I don't know how many excluded there will be."[105] In 2002, João Pedro Stedile admitted that in plotting the movement's politics, one had to keep in mind "that there are a great many lumpens in the country areas."[106] In Stedile's view, the existence of the large underclass should not be held against the working class character of the movement, because many rural working class had been "absorbed" into the periphery of the urban proletariat.[107] Such a view is shared by some academic authors, who argue that, behind its avowedly "peasant" character, the MST, as far as class politics is concerned, is mostly a semi proletarian movement, consisting of congregations of people trying to eke out a living in the absence of formal wage employment, out of a range of activities across a whole section of the social divisions of labour.[108]
MST somewhat filled the void left by the decline of the organized labor movement in the wake of Cardoso's neoliberal policies.[109] Therefore, the movement took steps to ally with urban struggles, especially those connected to housing.[110] João Pedro Stedile stated that the struggle for land reform would unfold in the countryside, but would be decided in the city, where "political power for structural change" resided.[111]
2005–2010 Lula government and March for Agrarian Reform
The Lula government was seen by the MST as a leftist and therefore friendly government, so MST decided to shun occupations of public buildings in favor of actions against private landed states[clarification needed], in a second wave of occupations starting in 2003.[112] However, the Lula government's increasingly conservative positions, including its low profile on land reform,[113][114] (actually somewhat less than achieved by Cardoso in his first term[115]) impelled the movement to change its stance as early as early 2004, when it again began to occupy public buildings and Banco do Brasil agencies.
In June 2003, the MST occupied the R&D farm of the Monsanto Company in the state of Goiás.[116] On March 7, 2008, a similar action by women activists at another Monsanto facility in Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, São Paulo, destroyed a nursery and an experimental patch of genetically modified maize, slowing ongoing scientific research. MST said they destroyed the facility to protest government support for the extensive use of GMOs supplied by transnational corporations in agriculture. In 2003, Lula authorized the sale and use of GM soybeans, which led MST's Stedile to call him a "transgenic politician."[117] The dominance of transnationals over Brazilian seed production was summed by the fact that the Brazilian hybrid seed industry in the early 2000s was already 82% Monsanto-owned,[118] which the MST saw as detrimental to the development of organic agriculture in spite of the economic benefits, and enabling possible future health hazards similar to intensive use of pesticides.[119] Stedile later called Monsanto one of the ten transnational companies that controlled virtually all international agrarian production and commodity trading.[120] Similarly, in 2006, the MST occupied a research station in Paraná owned by Swiss corporation Syngenta, which had produced GMO contamination near the Iguaçu National Park. After a bitter confrontation over the existence of the station (which included easing of previous restrictions by the Lula government to allow Syngenta to continue GMO research), the premises were transferred to the Paraná state government, and converted into an agroecology research center.[121]
After an exchange of barbs between Lula and Stedile over what Lula saw as an unnecessary radicalization of the movement's demands,[122] the MST decided to call a huge national demonstration. In May 2005, after a two-week, 200-odd kilometer march from the city of Goiânia, nearly 13,000 landless workers arrived in their nation's capital, Brasília. The MST march targeted the U.S. embassy and Brazilian Finance Ministry, rather than President Lula. While thousands of landless carried banners and scythes through the streets, a delegation of 50 held a three-hour meeting with Lula, who donned an MST cap for the cameras. During this session, Lula recommitted to settling 430,000 families by the end of 2006, and to allocating the human and financial resources to accomplish this. He also committed to a range of related reforms, including an increase in the pool of land available for redistribution [Ramos, 2005]. Later, the Lula government would claim to have resettled 381,419 families between 2002 and 2006—a claim disputed by the MST.[123] The movement argued the numbers had been doctored by the inclusion of people already living in areas (national forests and other managed areas of environmental protection, as well as other already existing settlements) where their presence had only been legally acknowledged by the government.[124] The MST also criticised Lula's administration to call mere land redistribution by means of handing out of small plots land as "reform," when it was simply a form of welfarism (assistencialismo) that was unable to change the productive system.[90]
The march was held to demand, among other things, that President Lula implement his own limited agrarian reform plan, rather than spend the project's budget on servicing the national debt [Ramos, 2005]. Several MST leaders met with President Lula da Silva on May 18, 2005—a meeting that had been resisted by Lula since his taking of office.[125] The leaders presented Lula with 16 demands, including economic reform, greater public spending, and public housing. In interviews with Reuters, many of the leaders said they still regarded Lula as an ally, but demanded that he accelerate his promised land reforms. However, in September of that year, João Pedro Stedile declared that, in terms of land reform, Lula's government was "finished."[126] By the end of Lula's first term, it was clear that the MST had decided to act again as a separate movement, irrespective of the government's agenda.[127] As far as the MST was concerned, the greatest gain it received from the Lula government was the non-criminalization of the movement itself; the tough, anti-occupation measures taken by the Cardoso government were left in abeyance, and not enforced.[128] Attempts to officially define the MST as a "terrorist organization" were also opposed by Workers' Party congresspersons.[129] Nevertheless, the Lula government never acted in tandem with the MST, according to a general pattern of keeping organized social movements outside the fostering of the government's agenda.[130]
However, as stated by a German author, the Lula government year after year proposed a blueprint for land reform that was regularly blocked by regional agrarian elites.[131]
Lula's election to the presidency raised the possibility of active government support for land reform, so conservative media increased their efforts to brand the MST's actions as felonies.[132] In May 2005, Veja accused the MST of helping the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC), the most powerful prison-gang criminal organization in São Paulo. A police phone tap recording of a conversation between PCC leaders mentioned the MST; one of them said he had "just talked with the leaders of the MST," who would "give instructions" to the gang [133] about the best ways to stage what became the largest protest by prisoners' relatives in Brazilian history. On April 18, 2005, some 3,000 relatives protested prevailing conditions in São Paulo's correctional facilities.[134] The MST "leaders" were not named. No MST activist, real or alleged, took part in the taped conversations. The MST denied any link in a formal written statement, calling the supposed evidence hearsay, and an attempt to criminalize the movement.[135] In the wake of 9/11, Brazilian media tended to describe the MST as "terrorists," lumping it together loosely with various historical and mediatic happenings[136] in keeping with an international post-9/11 trends of relegating any political movement against existing globalization to beyond the pale, and outside the boundaries of permissible political discourse.[137]
The MST assumes its activities are continuously surveilled by military intelligence.[138] Various intelligence organs, Brazilian and foreign, assume a relationship between the MST and various terrorist groups.[139] The MST is regarded as a source of "civil unrest."[140]
In late 2005, a parliamentary inquiry commission, where landowner-friendly congressmen held a majority, classified the MST's activities as terrorism, and the MST itself as a criminal organization. However, its report met no support from the PT members of the commission, and a senator ripped it up before TV cameras, saying that those who voted for it were "accomplices of murder, people who use slave labor, [and] who embezzle land illegally."[141] Nevertheless, based on this report, a bill presented to the Chamber of Deputies in 2006 by Congressman Abelardo Lupion (Democrats- Paraná), proposed making "invading others' property with the end of pressuring the government" a terrorist action, and therefore, a heinous crime. A "heinous" crime in Brazilian law is a felony, designated as such in a 1990 Brazilian law, and those accused of committing them are ineligible for pretrial release.[142][143]
In April 2006, the MST took over the farm of Suzano Papel e Celulose, a large maker of paper products, in the state of Bahia, because it had more than six square kilometres devoted to eucalyptus growth.[144] Eucalyptus, a non-native plant, has been blamed for environmental degradation in northeastern Brazil,[145] as well as reducing the availability of land for small agricultural production, called by some as "cornering" producers (encurralados pelo eucalipto).[146] In 2011, Veja described such activities as plain theft of eucalyptus wood, quoting an estimate from the state's military police that 3,000 people earned a living in Southern Bahia from theft of wood.[147]
In 2008, a group of public attorneys from Rio Grande do Sul who were working with the state's military police issued a report, charging the MST with collusion with international terrorist groups. The report was used in state courts, according to Amnesty International, to justify eviction orders carried out by the police with "excessive use of force."[148] The group of attorneys made public a previously classified report by the Council of Public Attorneys of Rio Grande do Sul, and asked the state to ban the MST by declaring it an illegal organization.
The report declared further investigation pointless, "as it was public knowledge that the movement and its leadership were guilty of engaging in organized criminality." The report also proposed that where MST activists could "cause electoral disequilibrium," the activists' right to vote be withdrawn by striking them from the voter registry.[149] Declarations issued at the same time by the State Association of Military Policy Commissioned Officers, in an open Red Scare vein, declared the MST "an organized movement, striving at instituting a totalitarian state in our country."[150]
Between September 27 and October 7, 2009, the MST occupied an orange plantation in Borebi, State of São Paulo, owned by orange juice multinational Cutrale. The corporation claimed to have lost R$1.2 million (roughly US$603,000) in damaged equipment, missing pesticide, destroyed crops, and trees cut by MST activists.[151] In response, the MST declared the farm to be government property that was illegally embezzled by Cutrale, and that the occupation was intended to protest this, while the destruction was done by provocateurs.[152] Such questioning of the legality of existing private property by denouncing landowners as holding land in adverse possession was one of the movement's main political tools.[153] The Cutrale plantation, Fazenda S. Henrique, was occupied by the MST four more times until 2013, and the multinational's property rights over it are being contested in court by the Federal Government, who alleges that the farm lands were set aside as part of a 1910 settlement projects for foreign immigrants, rights over it going afterward astray during the following century.[154]
During the same period, the MST also repeatedly blocked highways[155][156][157][158] and railroads,[159] to create calls for public attention to the plight of landless workers.[160]
2010–present
The MST wholeheartedly declared support for Dilma Rousseff's candidacy, and once elected, she offered the movement very qualified support. In a national broadcast in November 2010, she declared land reform a question "of human rights," that is, a purely humanitarian one.[161] As Lula's chief of staff, she supported economic growth over ecological and land reform concerns.[162] In a radio interview during the campaign, she repeated the old conservative trope that economic growth could make Brazilian land issues recede: "What we are doing is doing away with the real basis for the instabilities of the landless. They are losing reasons to fight."[163] Thus, one author described the MST's endorsement of Rousseff as a choice of the "lesser evil."[164]
State agencies and private individuals continued to violently oppose the movement's activities. On 16 February 2012, eighty families were evicted from an occupation in Alagoas of a farm rented to a sugar mill awash in unpaid debts.[165] According to MST activist Janaina Stronzake, MST assumes that landowners have a hit list of MST leaders. Many have in fact been killed, although some murders were doctored to make them look like accidents.[166] In April 2014, a Global Witness report called Brazil "the most dangerous place to defend rights to land and the environment," with at least 448 people killed between 2002 and 2013 in disputes over environmental rights and access to land.[167] A report for the Catholic Pastoral Land Commission, Land Conflicts in Brazil 2013, estimated that land struggles were involved in 34 murders in Brazil in 2013, and 36 in 2012.
On April 16, 2012, a group of MST activists occupied the headquarters of the Ministry of Agrarian Development in Brasília, as part of the movement's regular "Red April" campaign, a yearly nationwide occupation initiative in honor of the April 1996 Eldorado dos Carajás massacre.[168] Minister Pepe Vargas[pt] declared ongoing talks between the government and the MST suspended for the duration of the occupation.[169]
Land activists were dissatisfied with the slowing pace of official land reform projects under the Rousseff government. Fewer families were officially settled in 2011 than in the previous 16 years. Government reaction to the occupation sparked widespread accusations from the PT base that Rousseff had sold out.[170] In a 2012 interview, Stedile admitted that the movement had not benefited from the policies of the PT administrations, since the coalition governments of the PT could not act politically on behalf of land reform.[171]
Both political pundits and activists thought Rousseff's first term was a lean period for land reform, and mainstream media called the MST "tamed" by the two consecutive PT administrations, and drained of mass support by steady economic growth and expanding employment—denying the movement its chief raison d'être. In 2013, MST attempted only 110 occupations.[172] The same year saw another low, with only 159 families resettled. MST National Coordinator João Paulo Rodrigues said that the federal government's reliance on agribusiness exports for procuring hard currency was the main reason the Rousseff administration did not advance land reform, and even went backwards in some cases.[173] The only recent advances in land reform policies had come in programs, such as the National Program for School Meals (PNAE) and Food Catering Plan (PAA), which purchased food from land reform farmers for use at public schools and other government facilities. However, Rodrigues disputed that such programs were "entirely disproportionate to what [was] being offered [in terms of public money, subsidized credits, etc.] to agribusiness." He concluded that the only chance for land reform in Brazil would be a kind of joint venture between small producers and urban working class consumers, as simple land redistribution would be fated to fail, as it had in Venezuela, "where Hugo Chávez stockedpiled seven million hectares of nationalized land property which remained unused for want of proper peasants."[174]
The PT government's base generally felt that the vested interest of agribusiness in setting development policies during the Lula and Rousseff administrations hampered aggressive policies of expropriation and land reform.[175]
In November 2014, amid the radicalization surrounding Rousseff's reelection, an unannounced visit to Brazil by Venezuelan Minister for Communities and Social Movements Elias Jaua led to an information exchange agreement in agro-ecology between the MST and the Venezuelan government. The visit and agreement created tension among the conservatives in the Brazilian Congress; Senator and landowner Ronaldo Caiado described it as "an arrangement between a high-placed representative of a foreign government and an unlawful entity, aimed at building a socialist society," and argued for a clearly more conservative stance on land reform, and therefore, less maneuvering room for the MST.[176] The movement described Caiado's reaction as evidence that "conservative sectors are hostile to any form of grassroots participation [in the political process]."[177]
In an even clearer sign of limited room, Rousseff chose Kátia Abreu, the notorious female landowner, to be a member of her second-term cabinet.[178][179] However, some have suggested that the ongoing tension between the MST and the PT, far from signaling an impending end, on the contrary, suggested a reconfiguration of the MST, from a single-issue movement to one with a wider focus on political and social emancipation.[180] Since the 1990s, such a tendency has been expressed in the integration of MST with various other grassroots organizations in a network sponsored by progressive Catholics, the CMP (Central de Movimentos Populares, or Union of Popular Movements),[181] through which the MST developed its collaboration with its urban "sister" organization, the MTST.[182]
Land ownership
Consolidation of land ownership continued unabated. In 2006, according to the property census, the Gini index of land concentration stood at 0.854, while at the beginning of military regime in 1967, it was at 0.836. In other words, concentration of land ownership into just a few hands actually increased.[183] As of 2009, Brazilian economic policy, especially in foreign exchange, relied upon trade surpluses generated by the agricultural exports, so "the correlation of forces moves against agrarian reform."[184] The resumption of sustained general economic growth in the Lula years might have greatly diminished social demand for land reform, especially among the informally and/or under-employed urban workers, who formed most of the movements' later membership.[185][186] In a 2012 interview, a member of the MST national caucus, Joaquim Pinheiro, declared that the recent increase in welfare spending and employment levels had had a "sobering" influence on Brazilian agrarian activism, but he declared himself in favor of government spending on social programs, adding that the MST feared, however, that people would become "hostages" to such programs.[187] But as of 2006, according to the MST, 150,000 families lived in its encampments, compared to 12,805 families in 1990.[188]
Organizational structure
The MST is organized entirely, from the grassroots level up to the state and national coordinating bodies, into collective units that make decisions through discussion, reflection, and consensus. This non-hierarchical pattern of organization, reflecting liberation theology and Freirean pedagogy, also avoids distinct leadership that can be bought off or assassinated.[189] The basic organizational unit, 10 to 15 families living in an MST encampment settlement,[190][191] is known as a nucleo de base. A nucleo de base addresses the issues faced by member families, and members elect two representatives, one woman and one man, to represent them at settlement/encampment meetings. These representatives attend regional meetings, and elect regional representatives, who then elect the members of the state coordinating body of the MST, a total of 400 members of state bodies—around 20 per state—and 60 members of the national coordinating body, around 2 per state. Every MST family participates in a nucleo de base, roughly 475,000 families, or 1.5 million people. João Pedro Stédile, economist and author of texts on land reform in Brazil, is a member of the MST's national coordinating body.
The MST is not a political party, and has no formal leadership, other than a dispersed group of some 15 leaders, whose public appearances are scarce. This secrecy minimizes the risk of arrest,[192] and also preserves a grassroots, decentralized organizational model. This is regarded as an important strategy by the MST, in that it allows the movement to maintain an ongoing and direct flow of communication between member-families and their representatives. Coordinators are aware of the realities faced by member-families, and are encouraged to discuss important issues with said families. This organizational blueprint seeks, in a way, to empower people politically by having them acting "in the way they see fit, true to local context."[193] To assist with communication between Coordinators and member-families, and as an attempt to democratize the media, the MST produces the Jornal Sem Terra and the MST Informa.
The MST is an ideologically eclectic rural movement of hundreds of thousands of landless peasants (and some who live in small cities), striving for land reform in Brazil. Since its inception, the MST has been inspired by liberation theology, Marxism, the Cuban Revolution, and other leftist ideologies. The flexible mix of discourse that includes "marxist concepts, popular religion, communal practices, citizenship principles, and radical democracy" has increased the movement's popular appeal.[196] The radical democratic and anti-hierarchical structure and goals of the MST have led some authors to consider it a large libertarian socialist, anarchist,[194] or autonomist Marxist organization.[195]
The landless say they have found institutional support in the Catholic Church's teachings of social justice and equality, as embodied in the activities of Catholic Base Committees (Comissões Eclesiais de Base, or CEBs), which generally advocate liberation theology and anti-hierarchical social relations. This theology, a radicalized re-reading of the existing social doctrine of the Church, became the basis of the MST's ideology and organizational structure.[189] The loss of influence of progressives in the later Catholic Church[when?], however, has reduced the closeness of the relationship between the MST and the Church, as such.[197]
MST's anti-hierarchical stance stems from the influence of Paulo Freire. After working with poor communities in the rural Brazilian state of Pernambuco, Freire observed that aspects of traditional classrooms, such as teachers with more power than students, hindered the potential for success of adults in adult literacy programs. He determined that the students' individual abilities to learn and absorb information were severely impeded by their passive role in the classroom. His teachings encouraged activists to break their passive dependence on oppressive social conditions, and become engaged in active modes of behaving and living. In the mid-1980s, the MST created a new infrastructure for the movement, directly guided by liberation theology and Freirian pedagogy. They did not elect leaders, so as to not create hierarchies, and to prevent corrupt leadership from developing.[189]
The MST has widened the scope of their movement. They have invaded the headquarters of public and multinational institutions, and begun to resist the appearance of fields of genetically modified crops, carrying out marches, hunger strikes, and other political actions. The MST cooperates with a number of urban and rural worker movements in other areas of Brazil[where?]. The MST also remains in touch with broader international organizations and movements that support and embrace the same cause.[198] The MST includes not only landless workers stricto sensu, or rural workers recently evicted from the land, but also the urban jobless and homeless people who want to make a living by working on the land; thus, its affinity with housing reform and other urban movements.[199] The squatters' movement MTST (Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem teto - Homeless Workers' Movement) is commonly seen as an offshoot of the MST.[200]
Liberation Theology and Mística
As mentioned above, the MST draws ideological inspiration from many conceptual frameworks, both religious and political, with one aspect of this inspiration being the practice of mística. Mística refers to performance or dance conducted in ceremony-like conditions, often with nonverbal components, and carried out with the intention of affirming confidence in desired goals or action.[201] With this in mind, mística can be considered a form of mysticism that exists within a distinctly Latin American context.[201] With regards to the MST, this form of mística underwent a series of changes prior to becoming fully adopted by the organisation as part of its methods and practices. Christian mysticism is often an individual experience, rather than collective and communal, and consequently, the form of mística practiced by the MST differs chiefly in this regard. It is a communal experience (often linked keenly with the emergence of CEBs) that often sees participation from the assembled group, rather than an individual, and this change was brought about by the influence of liberation theology on the MST in the late sixties.[201]
Additionally, as historian Daniela Issa notes, mística is a process by which communities associated with the MST can narrate their own history by reviving a collective memory of the oppressed, often in contexts where censorship and state violence are commonplace.[202] The form of mística associated with the MST also draws on a variety of cultures and origins, with roots in Catholic ritualism, as well as Afro-Brazilian religious practices that had first been introduced after the migration of slavery into Brazil in the 16th century. Not only this, but some contemporary historians have also identified aspects of the MST mística as having originated from Indigenous practices and belief systems.[202] One example of recent demonstrations of mística within the MST is found in the practices of the ceremony at the ten year anniversary of the Eldorado do Carajás massacre. Members engaging in mística carried effigies of the bodies, while singing and chanting, as they converged on a location that symbolised the site of the event.[202]
The MST highly value education, and the organisation is committed to the teachings of Freirian pedagogy, which espouses the process of conscientisation. This commitment to community education forms another aspect of the group's mixture of influences. Popular education and liberation theology are closely linked with the practice of mística within the MST, as CEB's, and the sense of community generated by popular education often form the site of mística—with many members having overlapping interests and participation in each aspect.[201] Such settlements and communities produced by the encampments of the MST actively encourage and sponsor the practice of mística within CEB's present, as a method of reaffirming commitment and dedication to the goals of the group, these goals often being exclusively linked to the political ambitions and campaigns at the time of practice.[201]
Ideological foundations of MST's later activism
The supposed opposition to capitalist modernity on the part of the movement[203] has led authors to ascertain that the MST activities express, in a way, the decline of a traditional peasantry, and its desire of restoring traditional communal rights.[204] This is what differentiates between the MST and a movement for the preservation of communal rights, such as the Zapatista Army of National Liberation.[205]
However, there are others who assert that instead of expressing the "decline" of the peasantry, the MST, developing as it was in Brazil, a country where agriculture has been tied to commodity production since colonial times, expresses the absence of a proper peasantry,[206] and has, as its social basis, a rural working class that strives to gain a foothold in the field of capitalist production. As remarked by non-specialist foreign onlookers, the MST's tagging of the landless as "rural workers"—i.e. proletarians, in the Marxist sense—appears sometimes more as a purely ideological branding than anything else.[207]
According even to a Leftist scholar like James Petras, the MST is undoubtedly a modernizing social movement, in that its main goal is to convert fallow states into viable units that are able to produce a marketable surplus—"to occupy, resist, and produce," as the movement's own motto goes.[208] It is also not a movement with a clear-cut anti-capitalist stance, as what it seeks is to "create a land reform based on small individual property-owners."[209] As far as its steads are concerned, the movement has adopted a mostly private enterprise-friendly stance: with the monies it has procured, it has financed mechanization, processing enterprises, livestock breeding, as well as granting access to additional credit sources.[210] Some even see the movement's aims as "quite limited," as in practice, it tends to merely provide a chance for some people "to interact with the [ruling] capitalist economy"[211] by means of a kind of "guerrilla capitalism," aimed at ensuring that smaller producers' associations carve a share of the market for agrarian produce against the competition of mammoth agribusiness trusts.[212]
In the view of Marxist authors, like Petras and Veltmeyer, such a stance would reflect the incapacity of a heterogeneous coalition of rural people to engage in a broad, anti-systemic coalition, which would include the urban working classes.[213] Shunning this Marxist paradigm, other authors see in the rhetoric of the MST the reflection of an ideological struggle, not for taking power, but for recognizance, for "reconstituting the diversity of rural Brazil".[214] This struggle for recognizance - despite its being couched in fiery radical rhetoric - is seen by some as "indeed relevant for the democratization of 'rural society', but [it does] not entail political motivations destined to promote ruptures".[215] In even more blunt terms, a recent academic paper asserts that the ideology of the MST, connected as it is in practice with the landlesss' concrete needs for making out a living in the countryside, is above all an edible ideology.[216] A recent German handbook describes the MST as a mere pressure group, unable to exert actual political power.[217] Other authors, however, maintain that the interest of the MST in maximize its members' everyday participation in the running of their own affairs is enough to describe the movement as "socialist" in a broad sense.[218]
Education
According to the MST, it taught over 50,000 landless workers to read and write between 2002 and 2005. It also runs the Popular University of Social Movements (PUSM)[219] at a campus in Guararema, São Paulo. Also called Florestan Fernandes School (FFS), after Marxist scholar Florestan Fernandes, the school offers secondary school classes in a variety of fields; its first graduating class (2005) of 53 students received degrees in Specialized Rural Education and Development. With the University of Brasília, the government of Venezuela and the NGO Via Campesina, as well as agreements with federal, state and community colleges, it offers classes in pedagogy, history, and agronomy, and technical subjects at different skill levels.[220] The building was constructed with by brigades of volunteers using soil cement bricks made onsite at the school.[221] The late Oscar Niemeyer designed an auditorium and further sustainable, low environmental impact expansion of the school complex is pending.[222][when?]
The MST formed its education sector in Rio Grande do Sul in 1986, a year after its first national convention.[223] By 2001, about 150,000 children attended 1,200 primary and secondary schools in its settlements and camps. The schools employ 3,800 teachers, many of them MST-trained. The movement has trained 1,200 educators, who run classes for 25,000 young people and adults. It trains primary-school teachers in most states of Brazil, and partners with international agencies such as UNESCO, UNICEF and the Catholic Church. Seven institutions of higher education in different regions provide degree courses in education for MST teachers.[224] Some call MST communal schools markedly better than their conventional counterparts in rural communities, in both quantitative and qualitative terms.[225]
Media coverage
The role of the MST as a grassroots organization running charter schools activity has attracted considerable attention from the Brazilian press, much of it accusatory. Veja, Brazil's largest magazine, known for unrestrained hostility [226] to social movements in general[227] published a profile[228] of two MST schools in Rio Grande do Sul and said the MST was "indoctrinating" children between 7 and 14.[229] Children were also shown what the article called propaganda films, which taught that genetically modified (GMO) products contain "poison", and were advised not to eat margarine that might contain GMO soybean. The Brazilian authorities allegedly had no control over MST schools, and according to the profile they did not follow the mandatory national curriculum set out by the Ministry of Education, which calls for "pluralism of ideas" and "tolerance". "Preaching" "Marxism" in MST schools was analogous to preaching radical Islam tenets in madrassas, the article said.[230]
This was just one episode in a long history of mutual very bitter animosity between Veja and the MST. In 1993, the magazine described the MST as "a peasant organization of Leninist character" and charged its leaders and activists with pretending to be homeless.[231] In February 2009 the magazine opposed public support for the "criminal" activities of the movement[232] and the MST charged the magazine a year later with "vandalizing" both journalism and the truth itself.[233] In 2011, a mention of the MST in Veja called it "a criminal mob".[234] In early 2014, after MST tried to invade the STF building, a Veja columnist described said it was "playing leader to a non-existing cause".[235] This journalistic mud-slinging has justified at least two academic monographs wholly dedicated to it alone.[236][237]
Overall the relationship of the mainstream media with the MST has been ambiguous: in the 1990s they tended to support land reform as a goal in general, and presented MST in a sympathetic light. For example, between 1996 and 1997 TV Globo broadcast a telenovelaO Rei do Gado (The Cattle Baron), in which a beautiful female sem terra played by actress Patricia Pillar falls in love with a male landowner.[238] In the same telenovela, a wake for the fictitious Senator Caxias, killed while defending an MST occupation, offered the opportunity for two real-life senators from the PT, Eduardo Suplicy and Benedita da Silva, to make cameo appearances as themselves praising their fictive colleague's agenda.[239]
The media however tend to disavow what they see as violent methods,[240] especially as the movement gathered strength.[241] It does not outright disavow the movement's struggle for land reform, but Brazilian media moralize: "to deplore the invasion of productive land, the MST's irrationality and lack of responsibility, the ill-using of distributed land parcels and to argue for the existence of alternate peaceful solutions".[242]
Sustainable agriculture
The increased importance of the technicians and experts within the MST has led some sections of the movement to strive to develop and diffuse technology suitable for a model of sustainable agriculture on the land the families farm.[243] Such self-developed technology is seen as a way to turn small producers from consumers into producers of technologies,[244] - and therefore as a hedge against small producers' dependence on chemical inputs and single-crop price fluctuations[245] and a way to preserving natural resources.[246] These efforts are gaining in importance as more movement families gain access to the land. For example, the Chico Mendes Center for Agroecology, founded May 15, 2004 in Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil on land formerly used by the Monsanto Company to grow genetically modified crops, intends to produce organic, native seed to distribute through MST. Various other experiments in reforestation, taming of native species[clarification needed] and medicinal uses of plans have been carried out in MST settlements.[247] The MST is the largest producer of organic rice in Latin America.[248]
In 2005, the MST partnered with the federal government of Venezuela, and the state government of Paraná, the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), and the International Via Campesina, an organization that brings together movements involved in the struggle for land from all over the world, to establish the Latin American School of Agroecology. The school, located in an MST agrarian reform project known as the Contestado settlement, signed a protocol of intentions in January[when?] during the fifth World Social Forum.[249]
↑ Anders Corr, No trespassing!: squatting, rent strikes, and land struggles worldwide. New York: South End Press, 1999, ISBN0-89608-595-3, page 146 in 2007
↑ Herbert Girardet, ed. Surviving the century: facing climate chaos and other global challenges. London, Earthscan, 2007, ISBN978-1-84407-458-7, page 185
↑ Dave Hill & Ravi Kumar, eds., Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences. New York: Routledge, 2009, ISBN978-0-415-95774-8, page 146
↑ James, Deborah (2007). Gaining Ground? Rights and Property in South African Land Reform. New York, New York: Routledge Cavendish. pp.148–149. ISBN978-0-415-42031-0.
↑ Michael Moran,Geraint Parry, eds., Democracy and Democratization. London: Routledge, 1994, ISBN0-415-09049-0, page 191; Arthur MacEwan, Neo-liberalism Or Democracy?: Economic Strategy, Markets, and Alternatives for the 21st Century. London: Zed Books, 1999, ISBN1-85649-724-0, page 148
↑ Michael Lipton, Land Reform in Developing Countries: Property Rights and Property Wrongs London: Routledge, 2009, ISBN978-0-415-09667-6, p. 275; Rodolfo Stavenhagen, Between Underdevelopment and Revolution: A Latin American Perspective. New Delhi: Abhinav, 1981, p. 10; Carlos H. Waisman,Raanan Rein, eds., Spanish and Latin American Transitions to Democracy. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2006, ISBN1-903900-73-5, pp. 156/157
↑ Bernardo Mançano Fernandes, "The MST and Agrarian Reform in Brazil". Socialism and Democracy online, 51, Vol. 23, No.3, available at Archived 2017-12-15 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Robert M. Levine, John Crocitti, eds., The Brazil Reader: History, Culture, Politics. Duke University Press, 1999, ISBN0-8223-2258-7, p. 264
↑ Wendy Wolford, This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil. Duke University Press, 2010, ISBN978-0-8223-4539-8, pages 38 sqq.
↑ Candace Slater, Trail of Miracles: Stories from a Pilgrimage in Northeast Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986, ISBN0-520-05306-0, p. 45
↑ Michael L. Conniff, Frank D. MacCann, eds., Modern Brazil: Elites and Masses in Historical Perspective. The University of Nebraska Press, 1991, ISBN0-8032-6348-1, page 133
↑ Sarah R. Sarzynski, History, Identity and the Struggle for Land in Northeastern Brazil, 1955--1985. ProQuest, 2008: page 284
↑ Candace Slater, Stories on a String: The Brazilian Literatura de Cordel. University of California Press, 1982, ISBN0-520-04154-2, page 210, footnote 10
↑ Anthony L. Hall, Developing Amazonia: deforestation and social conflict in Brazil's Carajás Programme. Manchester University Press: 1991, ISBN978-0-7190-3550-0, pages 188/189
↑ José Carlos Reis, As identidades do Brasil: de Varnhagen a FHC. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2007, ISBN978-85-225-0596-8, V.1, page 164
↑ Sam Moyo & Paris Yeros, eds., Reclaiming the land: the resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. London, Zed Books, ISBN1-84277-425-5, page 342
↑ Ronald H. Chilcote, ed. - Protest and resistance in Angola and Brazil: comparative studies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972, ISBN0-520-01878-8, page 191
↑ James F. Petras, Henry Veltmeyer, Cardoso's Brazil: a land for sale. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003, ISBN0-7425-2631-3, page 17
↑ Luiz Bezerra Neto, Sem-terra aprende e ensina: estudo sobre as práticas educativas do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais. Campinas, SP: Autores Associados, 1999, ISBN85-85701-82-X, page 30
↑ Robert M. Levine, Vale of tears: revisiting the Canudos massacre in northeastern Brazil, 1893–1897. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995, ISBN0-520-20343-7, page 65
↑ Angela Maria de Castro Gomes et al., A República no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2002, ISBN978-85-209-1264-5, page 118
↑ Edward L. Cleary, How Latin America Saved the Soul of the Catholic Church. Mahwah, NJ, Paulist Press, 2009, ISBN978-0-8091-4629-1, page 32; Angus Lindsay Wright & Wendy Wolford, To inherit the earth: the landless movement and the struggle for a new Brazil. Oakland, Food First Books, 2003, ISBN0-935028-90-0, page 74
↑ Sándor Agócs, The troubled origins of the Italian Catholic labor movement, 1878–1914. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1988, ISBN0-8143-1938-6, page 25; Scott Mainwaring, The Catholic Church and politics in Brazil, 1916–1985. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986, page 55
↑ Charles C. Geisler & Gail Daneker, eds. Property and values: alternatives to public and private ownership. Washington DC: Island Press, 2000, ISBN1-55963-766-8, page 31
↑ Marieta de Moraes Ferreira, ed., João Goulart: entre a memória e a história, Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2006, ISBN85-225-0578-0 , page 74
↑ the National Conference of Brazilian Bishops (CNBB) issued a document - Church and Land Problems - recognizing and pleading for public acknowledgement of communal rights to the land.
↑ José de Souza Martins, Reforma agrária: o impossível diálogo. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2004, ISBN85-314-0591-2, page 104
↑ Albert Breton, ed., Environmental governance and decentralisation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2007, ISBN978-1-84720-398-4, page 52
↑ Peter Rosset, Raj Patel, Michael Courville, Land Research Action Network, eds. Promised land: competing visions of agrarian reform. New York: Food First Books, ISBN978-0-935028-28-7, page 266
↑ "Constituição67". www.planalto.gov.br. Archived from the original on 24 October 2015. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
↑ Sonia Maria Ribeiro de Souza & Anthonio Thomaz Jr, "O Mst e a Mídia: O Fato e a Notícia". Scripta Nova, Vol. VI, no. 119 (45), 1st. August de 2002, available at Archived 2011-09-28 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Alfred P. Montero, Brazilian politics: reforming a democratic state in a changing world. Cambridge (U.K.): Polity Press, 2005, ISBN0-7456-3361-7, page 87
↑ Felipe Dutra Asensi, Curso Prático de Argumentação Jurídica, Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010, Google Books, partially available at
↑ Boaventura de Sousa Santos,César A. Rodríguez-Garavito, eds., Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. Cambridge University Press, 2005, ISBN978-0-521-84540-3, page 224
↑ George Meszaros, Social Movements, Law and the Politics of Land Reform: Lessons from Brazil. London: Routledge, 2013, ISBN978-0-415-47771-0, page 21
↑ Artur Zimerman, "Land and Violence in Brazil: A Fatal Combination". LASA paper, page 9. Available at Archived 2012-04-26 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved December the 20th.2011
↑ Roberto Gargarela, "Tough on Punishment: Criminal Justice, Deliberation, and Legal Alienation". IN Samantha Besson, José Luis Martí, eds. Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2009, ISBN978-0-19-955916-9, page 168
↑ Eugene Walker Gogol, The concept of Other in Latin American liberation. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, ISBN0-7391-0331-8, page 311
↑ Jan Rocha and Sue Branford. Cutting the Wire: The story of the landless movement in Brasil. 2002, Latin American Bureau, page 291
↑ James K. Boyce, Sunita Narain, Elizabeth A. Stanton, Reclaiming nature: environmental justice and ecological restoration. London: Anthem Press, 2007, ISBN1-84331-235-2, page 134; Peter P. Houtzager, The movement of the landless (MST) and the juridical field in Brazil. Institute of Development Studies, 2005
↑ Wilder Robles-Cameron, D.Phil. Thesis, University of Guelph. Dept. of Sociology & Anthropology, 2007: Peasant mobilization, land reform and agricultural co-operativism in Brazil. page 160. Available at Archived 2016-12-16 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Jayme Benvenuto Lima Jr., ed: Independence of Judges in Brazil. Recife: GAJOP/Bagaço, 2005, page 89. Available at Archived 2015-09-24 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved December 12, 2011.
↑ In August 1999, State Higher Court Judge Rui Portanova overruled a trial court decision granting a landowner's petition to evict MST from his property, with the following reasoning:
Before applying a law, the judge must consider the social aspects of the case: the law's repercussions, its legitimacy and the clash of interests in tension. The [MST] are landless workers who want to grow produce in order to feed and enrich Brazil, amid this globalized, starving world... However, Brazil turns her back on them, as the Executive offers money to the banks. The Legislative... wants to make laws to forgive the debts of the large farmers. The press charges the MST with violence. Despite all that, the landless hope to plant and harvest with their hands, and for this they pray and sing. The Federal Constitution and Article 5... offers interpretive space in favor of the MST... [I]n the terms of paragraph 23 of Article 5 of the Federal Constitution [that landed property must fulfill a social function], I suspended [the eviction.] (Decision #70000092288, Rui Portanova, State Court of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre)
↑ Mendes condena ações de sem-terra em Pernambuco e São Paulo. G1 newssite, 25 February 2009, available at Archived 2012-10-04 at the Wayback Machine
↑ MST tenta invadir STF em Brasília; PM usa bomba para dispersar manifestante. UOL newssite, February 12, 2014, available at Archived 2014-09-03 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Thomas William Merrick, Elza Berquó, National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Population and Demography. Panel on Fertility Determinants: The determinants of Brazil's recent rapid decline in fertility. Washington D.C.: National Academic Press, 1983, page 133
↑ Lee J. Alston, Gary D. Libecap, Bernardo Mueller, Titles, conflict, and land use: the development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian Amazonian Frontier. University of Michigan Press, 1999, ISBN0-472-11006-3, pages 67/68
↑ Biorn Maybury-Lewis, The politics of the possible: the Brazilian rural workers' trade union movement, 1964–1985. Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1994, ISBN1-56639-167-9, page 169
↑ Local mobilization of peasants dislocated by dam constructions was one of the primary sources of grassroots rural mobilization in the 1980s in southern Brazil, which gave rise to a national organization, the Movimento dos Atingidos por Barragens (MAB), or "Dam-slighted people's Movement"; cf. Franklin Daniel Rothman and Pamela E. Oliver, "From Local to Global: The Anti-Dam Movement in Southern Brazil". Mobilization: An International Journal, 1999, 4(1), available at Archived 2012-04-04 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed 16 November 2011
↑ Michel Duquette and others, Collective action and radicalism in Brazil: women, urban housing, and rural movements. University of Toronto Press, 2005, ISBN0-8020-3907-3, pages 140/141
↑ Gabriel A. Ondetti, Land, protest, and politics: the landless movement and the struggle for Agrarian Reform in Brazil. Pennsylvania State University, 2008, ISBN978-0-271-03353-2, pages 67/69
↑ Hank Johnston, Paul Almeida, eds.: Latin American social movements: globalization, democratization, and Transnational Networks. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006, ISBN978-0-7425-5332-3, Chapter 10
↑ Magda Zanoni, Hugues Lamarche, eds. Agriculture et ruralité au Bréil: un autre modèle de developpement, Paris: Khartala, 2001, ISBN2-84586-173-7, page 113
↑ Marlene Grade & Idaleto Malvezzi Aued, "A busca de uma nova forma do agir humano: o MST e seu ato teleológico", Paper presented at the XIth. Congress of Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política, Vitória, 2006; published at Textos e Debates (UFRR), Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista-RR, v. I, p. 16-35, 2005.
↑ Mauricio Augusto Font, Transforming Brazil: a reform era in perspective. Lanham, Ma: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003, ISBN0-8476-8355-9, page 94
↑ Cf. The description offered by the Trotskyist review International Viewpoint, in the article by João Machado, "The two souls of the Lula government", March 2003 issue (IV348), available at Archived 2011-10-17 at the Wayback Machine
1 2 William C. Smith, ed. Latin American democratic transformations: institutions, actors, and processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell-Wiley, 2009, ISBN978-1-4051-9758-8, page 259
↑ A stance endorsed by former US ambassador to Brazil Lincoln Gordon, known for his support for the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état: Lincoln Gordon, Brazil's second chance: en route toward the first world. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2001, ISBN0-8157-0032-6, page 129
↑ Eugene Walker Gogol, The concept of Other in Latin American liberation: fusing emancipatory philosophic thought and social revolt. Lanham, MA, Lexington Books, 2002, ISBN0-7391-0330-X, page 318
↑ Benjamin Keen, Keith Haynes: A History of Latin America: Independence to the Present. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2009, ISBN978-0-618-78321-2, Volume 2, page 526
↑ Fernando Henrique Cardoso (with Brian Winter), The accidental President of Brazil: a memoir.New York: Publicaffairs, 2006, ISBN978-1-58648-324-1, page 210
↑ Jorge I. Domínguez, Anthony Jones, eds.: The Construction of Democracy: Lessons from Practice and Research. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007, ISBN978-0-8018-8595-2, page 157
↑ João R. Martins Filho & Daniel Zirker, "The Brazilian Armed Forces After the Cold War: Overcoming the Identity Crisis". LASA paper, 1998, available at Archived 2012-04-26 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed December the 28th. 2011
↑ A. Haroon Akram-Lodhi, Saturnino M. Borras, Cristóbal Kay,eds., Land, poverty and livelihoods in an era of globalization: perspectives from developing and transition countries.Abingdon: Routledge, 2007, ISBN0-203-96225-7, pages 87/88
↑ Becky Mansfield, Privatization: property and the remaking of nature-society relations. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008, ISBN978-1-4051-7550-0, page 166
↑ Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize, Camille Bourguignon, Rogerius Johannes Eugenius van den Brink, eds.: Agricultural Land Redistribution: Toward Greater Consensus. Washington D.C.: The World Bank Publications, 2009, ISBN978-0-8213-7962-2, pages 295/296
↑ Alfred P. Montero, Brazilian politics, pages 88/89.
↑ Juan David Lindau, Timothy Cheek, Market economics and political change: comparing China and Mexico. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998, ISBN0-8476-8733-3, page 70
↑ Jurandyr Luciano Sanches Ross,ed. Geografia do Brasil,São Paulo: EDUSP, 2005, ISBN85-314-0242-5, page 534
↑ Anthony Peter Spanakos & Cristina Bordin, eds. Reforming Brazil. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press, 2004, ISBN0-7391-0587-6, page 103
↑ Stedile, "Landless Battalions", interview to Francisco de Oliveira, IN Francis Mulhern, ed., Lives on the Left: a Group Portrait. London: Verso, 2011, ISBN978-1-84467-798-6, preview available at Archived 2016-12-16 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Tom Mertes, Walden F. Bello, eds., A Movement of Movements: Is Another World Really Possible?. London: 2004, Verso edns., ISBN1-85984-504-5, pages 34/35
↑ David Clark, ed., The Elgar Companion to Development Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006, ISBN978-1-84376-475-5, page 332
↑ William C. Smith,ed. Latin American democratic transformations: institutions, actors, and processes. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 2009, ISBN978-1-4051-9758-8, page 258
↑ Thomas Janoski, ed., A handbook of political sociology: states, civil societies, and globalization. Cambridge University Press, 2005, ISBN978-0-521-52620-3, page 602
↑ Douglas H. Boucher,ed. The paradox of change: hunger in a bountiful world. Food First Books, 1999, ISBN0-935028-71-4, page 325
↑ out of a promised grand total of 430,000 resettled families, Lula had managed to actually settle a mere 60,000 in the first two years of his administration
↑ Alfred P. Montero, Brazilian politics: reforming a democratic state in a changing world. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press, 2005, ISBN0-7456-3361-7, page 139
↑ Wendy Hunter, The Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil, 1989–2009 . Cambridge University Press, 2010, ISBN978-0-521-73300-7, page 153
↑ Erin C. Heil, Powerless resistance: a theoretical discussion of power, resistance and the Brazilian Landless Movement. D, Phil. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2008, page 125. Available at Archived 2016-12-16 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Michael Ekers, Gillian Hart, Stefan Kipfer, Alex Loftus, eds: Gramsci: Space, Nature, Politics. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, ISBN978-1-4443-3970-3, pages 154/155
↑ Peter R. Kingstone, Timothy Joseph Power,eds. Democratic Brazil revisited. University of Pittisburgh Press, 2008, ISBN0-8229-6004-4, page 47
↑ Jorge Almeida, ed., Brazil in focus: economic, political and social issues. New York: Nova Science, 2008, ISBN978-1-60456-165-4, page 20
↑ "Folha de S.Paulo Reports: Lula Government Inflates Agrarian Reform Numbers". February 19, 2007, MST site, available at Archived 2011-09-27 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Kathryn Hochstetler, Civil society in Lula's Brazil. Centre for Brazilian Studies, University of Oxford, Working Paper 57, page 10. Available at "Archived copy"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 28 September 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
↑ Richard Bourne, Lula of Brazil: the story so far . Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008, ISBN978-0-520-24663-8, page 139
↑ Kurt Gerhard Weyland, Raúl L. Madrid, Wendy Hunter, eds: Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings. Cambridge University Press, 2010, ISBN978-0-521-13033-2, page 122
↑ Gabriel Ondetti, Land, Property and Politics, page 207
↑ Arinda Fernandes, "Crime Organizado e Terrorismo:Uma Relação Simbiótica Afetando a Economia Global". Revista do Mestrado em Direito da UCB, n.d.g., page 14. Available at "Fernandes". Archived from the original on 13 July 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2011. . Accessed December 16, 2011
↑ Steven Levitsky, Kenneth M. Roberts, eds. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011, ISBN978-1-4214-0109-6, page 301
↑ Christoph Blepp, Blockaden und Disparitäten?: Über das Entwicklungspotential und dessen Hindernisse in Brasilien. GRIN Verlag, 2011, n;p.g., page 10
↑ Noemí María Girbal-Blacha, Sonia Regina de Mendonça, eds., Cuestiones Agrarias en Argentina y Brasil, Buenos Aires, Prometeo, 2007, ISBN978-987-574-200-0, pages 146/147
↑ "VEJA on-line". Veja.abril.com.br. Archived from the original on 2 November 2013. Retrieved 14 August 2012.
↑ Police Brutality Observatory site Archived 2009-12-20 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved October 19, 2014
↑ Fhoutine Marie Reis Souto, "Mídia e terror: a pesquisa sobre cobertura jornalística do terrorismo no Brasil", page 6. Brazilian Political Science Association (ABCP) paper, available at "Archived copy"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link). Accessed December 16, 2011.
↑ Stanley Aronowitz, Heather Gautney, eds., Implicating Empire: Globalization and Resistance in the 21st Century World Order. New York: Basic Books, 2003, ISBN978-0-465-00494-2, page 282
↑ Alvarado, Arturo, "The Militarization of Internal Security and Its Consequences for Democracy: A Comparison Between Brazil, Mexico and Colombia". APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at Archived 2014-01-21 at the Wayback Machine
↑ John B. Alexander, "Intelligence Scotomas in Central and South America", The Proteus Monograph Series, Vol. 1, issue 4, March 2008.
↑ Karl R. DeRouen, Uk Heo: Defense and security: a compendium of national armed forces and security policies. ABC-Clio, Santa Barbara, Calif., Volume I, page. 75; Gary Prevost,ed. Neoliberalism and Neopanamericanism: the view from Latin America, New York: Palgrave, 2002, ISBN0-312-29456-5, page 116
↑ Relatório de CPI chama invasão de terra de "ato terrorista". Folha de S. Paulo, 29 November 2005. Available at Archived 2012-04-06 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Robert Gay, Lucia:testimonies of a Brazilian drug dealer's woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2005, ISBN1-59213-339-8, page 191
↑ Rafael Litvin Villas Bôas, "Terrorismo à brasileira: a retórica da vez da classe dominante contra o MST". Revista NERA, Ano 11, nº. 13, July-Dec./2008. Available at Archived 2012-04-25 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved December 11, 2011
↑ Amnesty International, Informe 2009 Amnistía International (in Spanish), Madrid:2009, ISBN978-84-96462-23-6, pages 124–125
↑ Pedrinho A. Guareschi, Alinne Hernandez, Manuel Cardenas, orgs.: Representaçoes Sociais em Movimento. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2010, ISBN978-85-7430-989-7, page 33
↑ Mario Guerreiro, "Ele estava certo e todos estavam errados". Federal University of Santa Catarina paper, n.d.g., available at Archived 2012-04-07 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed December 27, 2011
↑ "Cutrale afirma que MST causou R$1,2 milhão de prejuízo em sua fazenda de laranja". Agencia Brasil newssite, October 14, 2009, Archived 2014-10-19 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved October 19, 2014
↑ Boaventura de Sousa Santos, César A. Rodríguez Garavito, eds.: Land and Globalization from Below: towards a cosmopolitan legality. Cambridge University Press, 2005, ISBN978-0-521-60735-3, page 226
↑ "MST volta a ocupar fazenda da Cutrale no interior paulista". Agencia Brasil newssite, July 31, 2013, Archived 2014-10-19 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved October 19, 2014
↑ Lee J. Alston, Gary D. Libecap, and Bernardo Mueller, "Interest Groups, Information Manipulation in the Media, and Public Policy: The Case of the Landless Peasants Movement in Brazil". NBER Working Paper No. 15865, April 2010, page 12. Available at Archived 2015-09-15 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed December 16, 2010.
↑ Genny Petschulat, "Grass-Roots Struggle in the 'Culture of Silence': Collective Dialogue and the Brazilian Landless Movement". University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects, 2010, pages 47/48, available at Archived 2012-04-30 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved November the 19th. 2011
↑ Gustavo de L. T. Oliveira, "Land Regularization in Brazil and the Global Land Grab: A Statemaking Framework for Analysis". International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, p. 12.
↑ Benjamin Dangl, "Why land reform makes sense for Dilma Rousseff". The Guardian, 27th January 2011, available at Archived 2016-12-03 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Eduardo Silva, ed., Transnational Activism and National Movements in Latin America: Bridging the Divide. New York: Routledge, 2013, ISBN978-0-415-83237-3 , page 74
↑ "MST invade prédio do Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário". Folha.com newssite, April the 16th. 2012, available at Archived 2013-12-30 at the Wayback Machine
↑ "Governo suspende negociações após MST invadir ministério". Folha.com newssite, April the 16th. 2012, available at Archived 2013-12-31 at the Wayback Machine
↑ "Dilma fights accusations of selling out, risks losing party support". Global Post, April 6, 2012, available at Archived 2012-04-14 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Interview, Jornal dos Economistas, no.278, November 2012, pages 6/7
↑ "Em 2013, MST registra o menor número de invasões durante governos do PT". O Globo , January 1, 2014, Archived 2014-01-06 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved January 5, 2014
↑ Século Diário, December 28, 2013, Archived 2013-12-26 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved December 29, 2013
↑ " 'Agora estão tentando privatizar inclusive o ar', diz João Pedro Stédile" - IG newssite, December 11, 2013, Archived 2013-12-14 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved December 30, 2013
↑ Armando Boito Jr. & Tatiana Berringer, "BRASIL: CLASSES SOCIAIS, NEODESENVOLVIMENTISMO E POLÍTICA EXTERNA NOS GOVERNOS LULA E DILMA".REVISTA DE SOCIOLOGIA E POLÍTICA V. 21, Nº 47: 31-38 SET. 2013. Available at Archived 2015-04-27 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved April 19, 2015
↑ George Meszaros, Social Movements, Law and the Politics of Land Reform: Lessons from Brazil. London: Routledge, 2013, ISBN978-0-415-47771-0 , page 20
↑ "MST defende acordo de cooperação assinado com ministro venezuelano". Agencia Brasil, Carta Capital, 10 November 2014, available at Archived 2014-11-13 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved November 13, 2014
↑ "Lil' Miss Deforestation", who had clashed in public with the MST over the issue of slavelabour
↑ Bret Wallach, A World Made for Money: Economy, Geography, and the Way We Live Today.University Of Nebrasca Press:2015, ISBN978-0-8032-9891-0 , page 218; Francesco Giappichini, Brasile terzo millennio. Lulu Author: 2011. ISBN978-1-4709-2543-7 , page 216
↑ Jan Nederveen Pieterse,Adalberto Cardoso, eds., Brazil Emerging: Inequality and Emancipation. London: Routledge, 2014, ISBN978-0-415-83704-0 , Chapter 6
↑ Lúcio Flávio de Almeida & Félix Ruiz Sánchez. "Um grão menos amargo das ironias da história: o MST e as lutas sociais contra o neoliberalismo." Lutas Sociais-Desde 1996 - ISSN1415-854X (1998): 77-91.
↑ Jeffery R. Webber,Barry Carr, eds. The New Latin American Left: Cracks in the Empire.Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,2013, ISBN978-0-7425-5757-4 , pages 101/102
↑ A. Haroon Akram-Lodhi, Saturnino M. Borras, Cristóbal Kay, Land, poverty and livelihoods in an era of globalization, p. 111
↑ Wendy Muse Sinek, Coalitional Choices and Strategic Challenges: the Landless Movement in Brazil 1975–2000. Center for Latin American Studies working paper, University of California-Berkeley, September 2007, Paper no. 19. Available at Archived 2015-01-21 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed December the 28th. 2011. Pp. 29 sqq.
↑ Haro Brookfield, H. C. Brookfield, Helen Parsons: Family Farms: survival and prospect, p. 169
↑ Armando Boito, Andréia Galvão e Paula Marcelino: "Brasil: o movimento sindical e popular na década de 2000". CLACSO paper, n.d.g., available at Archived 2012-04-25 at the Wayback Machine , page 50. Accessed December the 29th. 2011
1 2 3 Gautney, Heather; Omar Dahbour; Ashley Dawson; Neil Smith (2009). Democracy, States, and the Struggle for Global Justice. New York, New York: Routledge Cavendish. pp.244–245. ISBN978-0-415-98983-1.
↑ "encampment" is for a non-legally recognized occupation, "settlement" for one already recognized
↑ Herbert Girardet, ed.Surviving the century: facing climate chaos and other global challenges. London: Earthscan, 2007, ISBN978-1-84407-458-7, page 186
↑ Lee J. Alston, Gary D. Libecap, Bernardo Mueller, Titles, conflict, and land use: the development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian Amazon frontier . The University of Michigan Press, 1999, ISBN0-472-11006-3, page 63
↑ Anil Hira, Trevor W. Parfitt, Development projects for a new millennium. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2004, ISBN0-275-97502-9, page 25
1 2 Zibechi, Raúl (2003). Genealogía de la revuelta: Argentina, la sociedad en movimiento (1. ed. en Argentinaed.). La Plata: Letra Libre. ISBN978-987-20834-1-0.
↑ Magda Zanoni, Hugues Lamarche,eds. Agriculture et ruralité au Brésil: un autre modèle de développement. Paris: Karthala,2001, ISBN2-84586-173-7, page 114
↑ John Burdick, Legacies of liberation: the progressive Catholic Church in Brazil at the start of a new millennium. Ashgate, The University of Virginia Press, 2004, ISBN978-0-7546-1550-7, page 101; Lícia Soares de Souza, Utopies américaines au Québec et au Brésil. Québec, Presses de L'Université Laval, 2004, ISBN2-7637-8075-X, page 120
↑ Richard Feinberg,Carlos H. Waisman,Leon Zamosc, eds., Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, ISBN1-4039-7228-1 , pages 156/157
↑ Magda Zanoni & Hugues Lamarche, eds. Agriculture et ruralité au Brésil, page 165
↑ Ben Selwyn, The Global Development Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, ISBN978-0-7456-6014-1 , page 198
↑ Jagdish N. Bhagwati,In defense of globalization, 24, which equates MST activism with the late mediaeval and early modern anti-usury laws
↑ Anthony W. Pereira, The end of the peasantry: the rural labor movement in northeast Brazil. University of Pittisburgh Press: 1997, ISBN0-8229-3964-9,page 165
↑ Henry Veltmeyer, Tom Brass: Latin American peasants. London, Frank Cass, 2003, ISBN0-203-50566-2, page 312
↑ Joan Martínez Alier, Ecologia dei poveri. La Lotta per la giustizia ambientale. Milan: Jaca Book, 2009, ISBN978-88-16-40840-1, page 341
↑ Ana Sofia Ganho, Timothy Michael McGovern, Using Portuguese: A Guide to Contemporary Usage. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2004, ISBN0-521-79663-6, page 17
↑ James F. Petras, The new development politics: the age of empire building and new social movements. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing,2003, ISBN0-7546-3540-6, page 97
↑ David Nugent,& Joan Vincent, eds. A companion to the anthropology of politics. Malden, MA: Blackwel, ISBN0-631-22972-8, page 346
↑ Haro Brookfield, H. C. Brookfield, Helen Parsons, Family farms: survival and prospect: a world-wide analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007, ISBN0-203-93597-7, page 169
↑ Anil Hira, An East Asian model for Latin American success: the new path. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, ISBN978-0-7546-7108-4, page xii
↑ Michel DuQuette, Collective Action and Radicalism in Brazil,145
↑ Tom Brass,ed., Latin American Peasants. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2003, ISBN0-7146-8319-1, page 15
↑ Malcolm K. McNee, "Soundtracking landlessness", IN Idelber Avelar & Christopher Dunn, eds., Brazilian Popular Music and Citizenship. Duke University Press, 2011, page 151
↑ Zander Navarro, "'Mobilization without emancipation': the social struggles of the landless in Brazil". IN Boaventura De Sousa Santos, ed., Another Production Is Possible: beyond the capitalist canon. London: Verso, 2006, ISBN978-1-84467-078-9, page 156
↑ Wendy Wolford, "Edible Ideology? Survival Strategies in Brazilian Land-Reform Settlements".Geographical Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, July 1996, pp.457–461
↑ Markus Porsche-Ludwig,Wolfgang Gieler,Jürgen Bellers, eds., Handbuch Sozialpolitiken der Welt. Münster: LIT Verlag, 2013, ISBN978-3-643-10987-3 , page 140
↑ Steve Ellner, ed., Latin America's Radical Left: Challenges and Complexities of Political Power in the Twenty-first Century . Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014, ISBN978-1-4422-2948-8 , page 39
↑ See managing NGO's Association of Friends of the Florestan Fernandes School site, Archived 2014-08-06 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved August 29, 2014
↑ Cf. América Latina en Movimiento news website, January the 19th. 2005: "MST inaugura Escola Nacional Florestan Fernandes", text available at Archived 2011-07-18 at the Wayback Machine
↑ Rainer Grassmann & Analia Amorim, "Tecnologias construtivas de baixo impacto ambiental, alto valor social e cultural". Undergraduate monograph, abridgment, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism of the São Paulo University site Archived 2014-10-06 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved October 5, 2014
↑ Fernandes, Barnard Mancano. The Formation of the MST in Brazil. Editora Vozes, Petropolis 2000, page 78
↑ Edward L. Cleary, Mobilizing for human rights in Latin America. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, 2007, ISBN978-1-56549-241-7, page 79
↑ A Forbes magazine obituary of the recently deceased Veja boss, media mogul Roberto Civita, described the magazine's content as "filled with bomb-throwers and in clear opposition to the Workers' Party government": Forbes May 27, 2013, Archived 2017-09-08 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved July 18, 2013
↑ João Freire Filho,& Paulo Vaz, eds. Construções do Tempo e do Outro. Rio de Janeiro: MAUAD, 2006, ISBN85-7478-205-X, page 80; on the derogatory stance taken by Veja on Brazilian mass movements and on the common people in general, see Daniel do Nascimento e Silva, "Identities forged in pain and violence: Nordeste's writing" - Paper Prepared for delivery at the 2010 Congress of the Latin American Studies, Toronto, October 6–9, 2010, available at Archived 2011-07-18 at the Wayback Machine ; on the magazine's harsh treatment of all MST issues, see Miguel Carter, "The landless rural workers' movement (MST) and democracy in Brazil", University of Oxford/Center of Brazilian Studies, Working Paper CBS-60-05, available at "Archived copy"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 27 January 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link), especially footnote 47)
↑ September 8, 2004, titled "The MST's Madrassas". Author Monica Weinberg
↑ based on an MST publication "Education Notebook, no. 8" saying that one of the goals for children who attend the classes is to "develop class and revolutionary conscience".
↑ "VEJA on-line". Veja.abril.com.br. Archived from the original on 17 December 2012. Retrieved 14 August 2012.
↑ Diogo de Almeida Moisés, A Revista Veja na Cobertura da Luta de Terras no Brasi. B.A. Monography, Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte, Communication Sciences Department, 2005, available at "Archived copy"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 16 March 2012. Retrieved 9 April 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
↑ Do Silêncio à Satanização: o Discurso de Veja e o MST [From silence to "satanization": Veja discourse and the MST], by Eduardo Ferreira de Souza, São Paulo: Annablume, 2005, ISBN978-85-7419-453-0
↑ Chris Healy and Stephen Muecke, eds., Cultural Studies Review: Homefronts. The University of Melbourne: V.15, no.1, March 2009, page 158
↑ Kristina Riegert, ed., Politicotainment: television's take on the real. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2007, ISBN978-0-8204-8114-2, page 165
↑ John L. Hammond, "The MST and the Media: Competing Images of the Brazilian Farmworkers' Movement" . Latin American Politics & Society - Volume 46, Number 4, Winter 2004, pp.61–90
↑ Luciana Oliveira, Fighting for a Voice: Support for Land Reform Versus the Landless Workers Movement: A Framing Analysis of the Brazilian Press. VDM Verlag, 2009, ISBN978-3-639-19018-2
↑ Alessandra Aldé & Fernando Lattman-Weltman: "O Mst na TV: Sublimação do Político, Moralismo e Crônica Cotidiana do Nosso 'Estado de Natureza'". LPCPOP-Iuperj paper, available at "Archived copy"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 15 April 2012. Retrieved 22 December 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link). Retrieved December 22, 2011
↑ Ana Delgado Alemán, "Towards Inclusive Environmental Governance: a Study of the Expert-Lay Interplay in a Brazilian Social Movement". Doctoral Thesis, the University of Bergen, 2009, available at Archived 2012-04-25 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed November the 16th. 2011
↑ Michel P. Pimbert, ed L'Avenir de la alimentation et des petits producteurs, Reclaiming Diversity and Citizenship electronic conference, 2005, ISBN978-1-84369-589-9, page 33
↑ Ivette Perfecto, John H. Vandermeer, Angus Lindsay Wright: Nature's matrix: linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. London: Earthscan, 2009, ISBN978-1-84407-782-3, page 115
↑ Márcio Rosa D'Avila, Zur Einsatzmögilichkeit nichtkonventioneller Bauweisen in genosseschaftiliche organisierten sozialen Wohnungsbau für Rio Grande do Sul, Brasilien. Kassel University Press, 2006, ISBN978-3-89958-245-1, page 19
↑ Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Sebastião Venâncio Martins, High diversity forest restoration in degraded areas: methods and projects in Brazil. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2007, ISBN978-1-60021-421-9, page 218
↑ Ian Scoones, "Mobilizing Against GM Crops in India, South Africa and Brazil". Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol 8. issue 2-3, April 2008.
Related Research Articles
Fernando Henrique Cardoso, also known by his initials FHC, is a Brazilian sociologist, professor, and politician who served as the 34th president of Brazil from 1 January 1995 to 1 January 2003. He was the first Brazilian president to be reelected for a subsequent term. An accomplished scholar of dependency theory noted for his research on slavery and political theory, Cardoso has earned many honors including the Prince of Asturias Award for International Cooperation (2000) and the Kluge Prize from the US Library of Congress (2012).
The Workers' Party is a centre-left political party in Brazil that is currently the country's ruling party. Some scholars classify its ideology in the 21st century as social democracy, with the party shifting from a broadly socialist ideology in the 1990s, although the party retains a left-wing and marginal far-left faction to this day. Founded in 1980, PT governed at the federal level in a coalition government with several other parties from 1 January 2003 to 31 August 2016. After the 2002 parliamentary election, PT became the largest party in the Chamber of Deputies and the largest in the Federal Senate for the first time. With the highest approval rating in the history of the country at one time, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was PT's most prominent member. Dilma Rousseff, also a member of PT, was elected twice but did not finish her second term due to her impeachment in 2016. The party came back to power with Lula's victory in the 2022 presidential election.
The Brazilian Social Democracy Party, also known as the Brazilian Social Democratic Party or the Party of Brazilian Social Democracy, is a political party in Brazil. As the formerly third largest party in the National Congress, the PSDB was the main opposition party against the Workers' Party (PT) administrations of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff from 2003 to 2016.
Leonel de Moura Brizola was a Brazilian politician. Launched into politics by Brazilian president Getúlio Vargas in the 1930–1950s, Brizola was the only politician to serve as elected governor of two Brazilian states. An engineer by training, Brizola organized the youth wing of the Brazilian Labour Party and served as state representative for Rio Grande do Sul and mayor of its capital, Porto Alegre. In 1958 he was elected governor and subsequently played a major role in thwarting a first coup attempt by sectors of the armed forces in 1961, who wished to stop João Goulart from assuming the presidency, under allegations of communist ties. Three years later, facing the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état that went on to install the Brazilian military dictatorship, Brizola again wanted the democratic forces to resist, but Goulart did not want to risk the possibility of civil war, and Brizola was exiled in Uruguay.
José Serra Chirico is a Brazilian politician who has served as a Congressman, Senator, Minister of Planning, Minister of Health, Mayor of São Paulo, Governor of São Paulo state, and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Brazil.
Ciro Ferreira Gomes, known mononymously as Ciro, is a Brazilian politician, lawyer, and academic. Ciro is currently affiliated with and vice-president of the Democratic Labour Party (PDT).
Anthony William Matheus de Oliveira, also known as Anthony Garotinho, is a Brazilian politician, radio broadcaster and convicted felon. He legally adopted his stage name "Garotinho", originally a nickname he took while working as a radio sports broadcaster.
The Homeless Workers Movement is a social movement in Brazil. It originated from the Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra. Although the MTST can trace its first urban activism efforts to the occupation of Campinas in São Paulo during the 1997 National People's March, this intervention was organized within the Landless Rural Worker's Rural Movement (MST) structure. The first proper occupation as a new sociopolitical actor, distinct from the MST, took place in Guarulhos in 2002. It was named after Anita Garibaldi, considered to be a radical social reformer during her lifetime.
General elections were held in Brazil on 4 October 1998 to elect the President, National Congress and state governorships. If no candidate in the presidential election received more than 50% of the vote in the first round, a second-round runoff would have been held on 25 October. The election saw voting machines used for the first time in Brazilian history.
General elections were held in Brazil on 6 October 2002, with a second round of the presidential election on 27 October. The elections were held in the midst of an economic crisis that began in the second term of the incumbent president, Fernando Henrique Cardoso of the centre-right Brazilian Social Democracy Party (PSDB). Due to constitutional term limits, Cardoso was ineligible to run for a third consecutive term.
Socialism in Brazil is generally thought to trace back to the first half of the 19th century. There are documents evidencing the diffusion of socialist ideas since then, but these were individual initiatives with no ability to form groups with actual political activism.
General elections were held in Brazil on 1 October 2006 to elect the president, National Congress and state governors, with a second round of the presidential election on 29 October as no candidate received more than 50% of the vote in the first round.
General elections were held in Brazil on October 3, 1994, the second to take place under the provisions of the 1988 constitution and the second direct presidential election since 1960.
Agrarian socialism is a political ideology that promotes social ownership of agrarian and agricultural production as opposed to private ownership. Agrarian socialism involves equally distributing agricultural land among collectivized peasant villages. Many agrarian socialist movements have tended to be rural, locally focused, and traditional. Governments and political parties seeking agrarian socialist policies have existed throughout the world, in regions including Europe, Asia, North America, Latin America, Africa and Australia.
Lulism is a political ideology describing the 2006 consolidation of segments of Brazilian society previously hostile to social movements and the Workers' Party behind political forces led by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, appealed by a controlled reformism and limited structural change focused on the poorest sections of society. The lower classes, who had distanced themselves from Lula, accepted his candidacy after his first term as President as the middle class turned from him. The rhetoric and praxis which united the maintenance of stability and state distributism are the origins of Lulism. While advocating socialism, Lulism aims for a 'social liberal' approach that gradually resolves the gap between the rich and the poor in a market-oriented way.
The 2017 Brazilian general strike took place on 28 April, 100 years after Brazil's first general strike in June 1917. The movement was a protest against reforms of labor laws, which were later adopted and social security proposed by Michel Temer government and pending in National Congress of Brazil.
The International Committee of Solidarity in Defence of Lula and Democracy in Brazil, also known as the Free Lula Movement, was a political and social movement composed of several Brazilian entities that advocated the release of the ex-President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula, from prison. Lula was convicted of money laundering and passive corruption, defined in Brazilian criminal law as the receipt of a bribe by a civil servant or government official. In 2017 he was sentenced to nine years and six months in prison by judge Sergio Moro. On February 6, 2019, in another trial he was sentenced to 12 years and 11 months of imprisonment for the crimes of passive corruption and money laundering in the process that deals with the receipt of undue advantages through reforms made at a site in Atibaia and paid by Odebrecht and Schahin as counterpart for the conclusion of overburdened contracts with Petrobras. However, leaked cellphone chats published by The Intercept suggested Sergio Moro, who became a justice minister after the conviction, steered the case against Lula.
Squatting in Brazil is the occupation of unused or derelict buildings or land without the permission of the owner. After attempting to eradicate slums in the 1960s and 1970s, local governments transitioned to a policy of toleration. Cities such as Recife, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo have large informal settlements known as favelas. A more recent phenomenon is the occupation of buildings in city centres by organised groups. In rural areas across the country, the Landless Workers' Movement (MST) arranges large land occupations.
Nabhan Garcia is a Brazilian politician and farmer, who was the Secretary of Land Affairs in the government of President Jair Bolsonaro, in addition to being appointed as president of the Rural Democratic Union. A member of the Brazilian branch of the Nabhan family, he is the son of Sofia Nabhan Garcia and Rafael Garcia Martins.
Third Way politics have been used to describe many types of Brazilian political groups, vaugely ranging the political center. Stemming from the Brazilian Social Democracy Party, the Third Way movement in Brazil saw its hight during the presidency of Fernando Henrique Cardoso. In modern Brazilian politics, the term is more commonly used for politics in opposition or unaligned with the dominant forces of the left-wing Workers' Party and those of Jair Bolsonaro..
References
Patel, Raj. "Stuffed & Starved" Portobello Books, London, 2007
Wolford, Wendy. "This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil." Duke University Press, Durham, 2010. ISBN0-8223-4539-0
Wright, Angus, and Wendy Wolford. To Inherit the Earth: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for a New Brazil. Food First Books, Oakland, 2003. ISBN0-935028-90-0
Carter, Miguel.The MST and Democracy in Brazil. Working Paper CBS-60-05, Centre for Brazilian Studies, University of Oxford, 2005. Available at . Retrieved November 2, 2014
Ramos, Tarso Luis. Brazil at the Crossroads: Landless Movement Confronts Crisis of the Left. 2005.
—, "Agroecology vs. Monsanto in Brazil", Food First News & Views, vol. 27, number 94, fall 2004, 3.
Branford, Sue and Rocha, Jan. Cutting the Wire: The story of the landless movement in Brazil. 2002. Latin American Bureau, London.
Questoes Agrarias: Julgado Comentados e Paraceres. Editora Metodo, São Paulo, 2002.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
