Openness to experience

Last updated

Openness to experience is one of the domains which are used to describe human personality in the Five Factor Model. [1] [2] Openness involves six facets, or dimensions: active imagination (fantasy), aesthetic sensitivity, attentiveness to inner feelings, preference for variety (adventurousness), intellectual curiosity, and challenging authority (psychological liberalism). [3] A great deal of psychometric research has demonstrated that these facets or qualities are significantly correlated. [2] Thus, openness can be viewed as a global personality trait consisting of a set of specific traits, habits, and tendencies that cluster together.

Contents

Openness tends to be normally distributed with a small number of people scoring extremely high or low on the trait, and most people scoring moderately. [2] People who score low on openness are considered to be closed to experience. They tend to be conventional and traditional in their outlook and behavior. They prefer familiar routines to new experiences, and generally have a narrower range of interests.

Openness has moderate positive relationships with creativity, intelligence, and knowledge. [4] Openness is related to the psychological trait of absorption, and like absorption has a modest relationship[ specify ] to individual differences in hypnotic susceptibility. Openness has more modest relationships with aspects of subjective well-being than other Five Factor Model personality traits. [5]

On the whole, openness appears to be largely unrelated to symptoms of mental disorders. [6]

Measurement

Openness to experience is usually assessed with self-report measures, although peer-reports and third-party observation are also used. Self-report measures are either lexical [7] or based on statements. [8] Which measure of either type is used is determined by an assessment of psychometric properties and the time and space constraints of the research being undertaken.[ citation needed ]

A number of studies have found that openness to experience has two major subcomponents, one related to intellectual dispositions, the other related to the experiential aspects of openness, such as aesthetic appreciation and openness to sensory experiences. These subcomponents have been referred to as intellect and experiencing openness respectively, and have a strong positive correlation (r = .55) with each other. [11]

According to research by Sam Gosling, it is possible to assess openness by examining people's homes and work spaces. People who are highly open to experience tend to have distinctive and unconventional decorations. They are also likely to have books on a wide variety of topics, a diverse music collection, and works of art on display. [12]

Psychological aspects

Openness to experience has both motivational and structural components. [13] People high in openness are motivated to seek new experiences and to engage in self-examination. Structurally, they have a fluid style of consciousness that allows them to make novel associations between remotely connected ideas. Closed people by contrast are more comfortable with familiar and traditional experiences.

Creativity

Openness to experience correlates with creativity, as measured by tests of divergent thinking. [14] Openness has been linked to both artistic and scientific creativity as professional artists, musicians, and scientists have been found to score higher in openness compared to members of the general population. [15]

Intelligence and knowledge

Openness to experience correlates with intelligence, correlation coefficients ranging from about r=.30 to r=.45. [16] These relations vary significantly based on which component of intelligence is examined. For example, meta-analyses have found relations ranging from .08 with processing speed abilities to .29 with verbal abilities. [17] Another common distinction is between crystallized intelligence and fluid intelligence. Some studies have found moderate associations with crystallized intelligence but only weak associations with fluid intelligence. [16] [18] In contrast, more recent meta-analyses have found more similar relations for crystallized and fluid abilities (.20 and .19, respectively). [17] A study examining the facets of openness found that the Ideas and Actions facets had modest positive correlations with fluid intelligence (r=.20 and r=.07 respectively). [16] Meta-analyses have also found the ideas, curiosity, and need for cognition facets (i.e., facets most associated with the intellect aspect of openness) to be positive correlates of fluid abilities with correlations ranging from .18 to .21. [17] Fluid abilities may come more easily for people who tend to be curious and open to learning. Alternatively, people with strong fluid abilities may find it more enjoyable to ponder and explore ideas. Several studies have found positive associations between openness to experience and general knowledge, [19] [20] especially verbal knowledge. [17] People high in openness may be more motivated to engage in intellectual pursuits that increase their knowledge. [20] Openness to experience, especially the Ideas facet, is related to need for cognition, [21] a motivational tendency to think about ideas, scrutinize information, and enjoy solving puzzles, and to typical intellectual engagement [22] (a similar construct to need for cognition). [23]

Absorption and hypnotisability

Openness to experience is strongly related to[ clarification needed ] the psychological construct of absorption, [24] defined as "a disposition for having episodes of 'total' attention that fully engage one's representational (i.e. perceptual, enactive, imaginative, and ideational) resources.” [25]

The construct of absorption was developed in order to relate individual differences in hypnotisability to broader aspects of personality. [24] [26] The construct of absorption influenced Costa and McCrae's development of the concept of "openness to experience" in their original NEO model, due to the independence of absorption from extraversion and neuroticism. [24] A person's openness to becoming absorbed in experiences seems to require a more general openness to new and unusual experiences. Openness to experience, like absorption, has modest positive correlations with individual differences in hypnotisability. [26]

Factor analysis shows that the fantasy, aesthetics, and feelings facets of openness are closely related to absorption and predict hypnotisability, whereas the remaining three facets of ideas, actions, and values are largely unrelated to these constructs. [24] [26] This finding suggests that openness to experience may have two distinct yet related subdimensions: one related to aspects of attention and consciousness assessed by the facets of fantasy, aesthetics, and feelings; the other related to intellectual curiosity and social/political liberalism as assessed by the remaining three facets. However, all of these have a common theme of ‘openness’ in some sense. This two-dimensional view of openness to experience is particularly pertinent to hypnotisability. However, when considering external criteria other than hypnotisability, it is possible that a different dimensional structure may be apparent, e.g. intellectual curiosity may be unrelated to social/political liberalism in certain contexts. [26]

Relationship to other personality traits

Although the factors in the Big Five model are assumed[ by whom? ] to be independent, openness to experience and extraversion as assessed in the NEO-PI-R have a substantial positive correlation. [27] Openness to experience also has a moderate positive correlation with sensation-seeking, particularly, the experience seeking facet. [28] In spite of this, it has been argued[ by whom? ] that openness to experience is still an independent personality dimension from these other traits because most of the variance in the trait cannot be explained by its overlap with these other constructs. A study comparing the Temperament and Character Inventory with the Five Factor model found that Openness to experience had a substantial positive correlation with self-transcendence (a "spiritual" trait) and to a lesser extent novelty seeking (conceptually similar to sensation seeking). [29] It also had a moderate negative correlation with harm avoidance.

The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) measures the preference of "intuition," which is related to openness to experience. [30] Robert McCrae pointed out that the MBTI sensation versus intuition scale "contrasts a preference for the factual, simple, and conventional with a preference for the possible, complex, and original," and is therefore similar to measures of openness. [31]

Social and political attitudes

There are social and political implications to this personality trait. People who are highly open to experience tend to be liberal and tolerant of diversity. [32] As a consequence, they are generally more open to different cultures and lifestyles. They are lower in ethnocentrism, right-wing authoritarianism, [33] social dominance orientation, and prejudice. [34] Openness has a stronger (negative) relationship with right-wing authoritarianism than the other five-factor model traits (conscientiousness has a modest positive association, and the other traits have negligible associations). [34] Openness has a somewhat smaller (negative) association with social dominance orientation than (low) agreeableness (the other traits have negligible associations). Openness has a stronger (negative) relationship with prejudice than the other five-factor model traits (agreeableness has a more modest negative association, and the other traits have negligible associations). However, right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation are each more strongly (positively) associated with prejudice than openness or any of the other five-factor model traits. [34]

The relationship between openness and prejudice may be more complex, as the prejudice examined was prejudice against conventional minority groups (for example sexual and ethnic minorities) and that people who are high in openness can still be intolerant of those with conflicting worldviews. [35]

Regarding conservatism, studies have found that cultural conservatism was related to low openness and all its facets, but economic conservatism was unrelated to total openness, and only weakly negatively related to the Aesthetics and values facets. [36] The strongest personality predictor of economic conservatism was low agreeableness (r=−.23). Economic conservatism is based more on ideology whereas cultural conservatism seems to be more psychological than ideological and may reflect a preference for simple, stable, and familiar mores. [36] Some research indicates that within-person changes in levels of openness do not predict changes in conservatism. [37]

Subjective well-being and mental health

Openness to experience has modest yet significant correlations with happiness, positive affect, and quality of life, but is unrelated to life satisfaction, negative affect, and overall affect in people in general. [5] These relationships with aspects of subjective well-being tend to be weaker than those of other five-factor model traits, that is, extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, and agreeableness.

Openness to experience correlates with life satisfaction in older adults after controlling for confounding factors. [38]

Openness appears to be unrelated to the presence of mental disorders.[ clarification needed ] A meta-analysis of the relationships between five-factor model traits and symptoms of psychological disorders found that none of the diagnostic groups examined differed from healthy controls on openness to experience. [6]

Openness to experience may contribute to graceful aging, facilitating healthy memory and verbal abilities as well as a number of other significant cognitive features in older adults. [39]

Personality disorders

At least three aspects of openness are relevant to understanding personality disorders: cognitive distortions, lack of insight, and impulsivity. Problems related to high openness that can cause issues with social or professional functioning are excessive fantasizing, peculiar thinking, diffuse identity, unstable goals, and nonconformity with the demands of the society. [40]

High openness is characteristic to schizotypal personality disorder (odd and fragmented thinking), narcissistic personality disorder (excessive self-valuation), and paranoid personality disorder (sensitivity to external hostility). Lack of insight (shows low openness) is characteristic to all personality disorders and could explain the persistence of maladaptive behavioral patterns. [41]

Problems associated with low openness are difficulties adapting to change, low tolerance for different worldview or lifestyles, emotional flattening, alexithymia, and a narrow range of interests. [40] Rigidity is the most obvious aspect of (low) openness among personality disorders; it shows lack of knowledge of one's emotional experiences. It is most characteristic of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Its opposite, known as impulsivity (here: an aspect of openness that shows a tendency to behave unusually or autistically), is characteristic of schizotypal and borderline personality disorders. [41]

Religiosity and spirituality

Openness to experience has mixed relationships with different types of religiosity and spirituality. [42] General religiosity has a weak association with low openness. Religious fundamentalism has a somewhat more substantial relationship with low openness. Mystical experiences occasioned by the use of psilocybin were found to increase openness significantly (see 'Drug Use,' below).

Gender

A study examining gender differences in big-five personality traits in 55 nations found that across nations there were negligible average differences between men and women in openness to experience. [43] By contrast, across nations women were found to be significantly higher than men in average neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. In eight cultures, men were significantly higher than women in openness, but in four cultures women were significantly higher than men. Previous research found that women tend to be higher on the feelings facet of openness, whereas men tend to be higher on the ideas facet, although the 55-nation study did not assess individual facets. [43]

Dream recall

A study on individual differences in the frequency of dream recall found that openness to experience was the only big-five personality trait related to dream recall. Dream recall frequency has also been related to similar personality traits, such as absorption and dissociation. The relationship between dream recall and these traits has been considered as evidence of the continuity theory of consciousness[ clarification needed ]. People who have vivid and unusual experiences during the day, such as those who are high in these traits, tend to have more memorable dream content and hence better dream recall. [44]

Sexuality

Openness is related to many aspects of sexuality. Men and women high in openness are more well-informed about sex and have wider sexual experience, stronger sex drives, and more liberal sexual attitudes. [31] In married couples, wives' but not husbands' level of openness is related to sexual satisfaction. This might be because open wives are more willing to explore a variety of new sexual experiences, leading to greater satisfaction for both spouses. [36] Compared to heterosexuals, people who are homosexual, asexual, or bisexual—particularly bisexuals—average higher in openness. [45]

Genes and physiology

Openness to experience, like the other traits in the five-factor model, is believed to have a genetic component. Identical twins (who have the same DNA) show similar scores on openness to experience, even when they have been adopted into different families and raised in very different environments. [46] A meta-analysis by Bouchard and McGue, of four twin studies, found openness to be the most heritable (mean = 57%) of the Big Five traits. [47]

Higher levels of openness have been linked to activity[ clarification needed ] in the ascending dopaminergic system and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Openness is the only personality trait that correlates with neuropsychological tests of dorsolateral prefrontal cortical function, supporting theoretical links among openness, cognitive functioning, and IQ. [48]

Geography

An Italian study found that people who lived on Tyrrhenian islands tended to be less open to experience than those living on the nearby mainland, and that people whose ancestors had inhabited the islands for twenty generations tended to be less open to experience than more recent arrivals. Additionally, people who emigrated from the islands to the mainland tended to be more open to experience than people who stayed on the islands, and than those who immigrated to the islands. [49]

People living in the eastern and western parts of the United States tend to score higher on openness to experience than those living in the Midwestern United States and the Southern United States. The highest average scores on openness are found in the states of New York, Oregon, Massachusetts, Washington, and California. Lowest average scores come from North Dakota, Wyoming, Alaska, Alabama, and Wisconsin. [50]

Drug use

Psychologists in the early 1960s used the concept of openness to experience to describe people who are more likely to use marijuana. Openness was defined in these studies as high creativity, adventuresomeness, internal sensation novelty seeking, and low authoritarianism. Several correlational studies confirmed that young people who score high on this cluster of traits are more likely to use marijuana. [51] More recent research replicated this finding using contemporary measures of openness. [52]

Cross-cultural studies found that cultures high in Openness to experience have higher rates of use of the drug MDMA, although a study at the individual level in the Netherlands found no differences in openness levels between users and non-users. [36] MDMA users tended to be higher in extroversion and lower in conscientiousness than non-users.

A 2011 study found Openness (and not other traits) increased after the use of psilocybin, an effect that held even after 14 months. [53] The study found that individual differences in levels of mystical experience while taking psilocybin were correlated with increases in Openness. Participants who met criteria for a 'complete mystical experience' [note 1] experienced a significant mean increase in Openness, whereas those participants who did not meet the criteria experienced no mean change in Openness. Five of the six facets of Openness (all except Actions) showed this pattern of increase associated with having a mystical experience. Increases in Openness (including facets as well as total score) among those whose had a complete mystical experience were maintained more than a year after taking the drug. Participants who had a complete mystical experience changed more than four T-score points between baseline and follow up. By comparison, Openness has been found to normally decrease with aging by one T-score point per decade.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Six aspects of mystical experience were assessed: unity, transcendence of time and space, ineffability and paradoxicality, sacredness, noetic quality, and positive mood. Participants were deemed to have a 'complete' mystical experience if they scored 60% or higher on all six aspects. [53]

Related Research Articles

Personality is any person's collection of interrelated behavioral, cognitive and emotional patterns that comprise a person’s unique adjustment to life. These interrelated patterns are relatively stable, but can change over long time periods.

In psychology, trait theory is an approach to the study of human personality. Trait theorists are primarily interested in the measurement of traits, which can be defined as habitual patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion. According to this perspective, traits are aspects of personality that are relatively stable over time, differ across individuals, are relatively consistent over situations, and influence behaviour. Traits are in contrast to states, which are more transitory dispositions.

Trait ascription bias is the tendency for people to view themselves as relatively variable in terms of personality, behavior and mood while viewing others as much more predictable in their personal traits across different situations. More specifically, it is a tendency to describe one's own behaviour in terms of situational factors while preferring to describe another's behaviour by ascribing fixed dispositions to their personality. This may occur because peoples' own internal states are more readily observable and available to them than those of others.

Conscientiousness is the personality trait of being responsible, careful, or diligent. Conscientiousness implies a desire to do a task well, and to take obligations to others seriously. Conscientious people tend to be efficient and organized as opposed to easy-going and disorderly. They tend to show self-discipline, act dutifully, and aim for achievement; they display planned rather than spontaneous behavior; and they are generally dependable. Conscientiousness manifests in characteristic behaviors such as being neat, systematic, careful, thorough, and deliberate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Big Five personality traits</span> Personality model consisting of five broad dimensions

In trait theory, the Big Five personality traits is a group of five unique characteristics used to study personality:

Personality development encompasses the dynamic construction and deconstruction of integrative characteristics that distinguish an individual in terms of interpersonal behavioral traits. Personality development is ever-changing and subject to contextual factors and life-altering experiences. Personality development is also dimensional in description and subjective in nature. That is, personality development can be seen as a continuum varying in degrees of intensity and change. It is subjective in nature because its conceptualization is rooted in social norms of expected behavior, self-expression, and personal growth. The dominant viewpoint in personality psychology indicates that personality emerges early and continues to develop across one's lifespan. Adult personality traits are believed to have a basis in infant temperament, meaning that individual differences in disposition and behavior appear early in life, potentially before language of conscious self-representation develop. The Five Factor Model of personality maps onto the dimensions of childhood temperament. This suggests that individual differences in levels of the corresponding personality traits are present from young ages.

Neuroticism is a personality trait associated with negative emotions. It is one of the Big Five traits. Individuals with high scores on neuroticism are more likely than average to experience such feelings as anxiety, worry, fear, anger, frustration, envy, jealousy, pessimism, guilt, depressed mood, and loneliness. Such people are thought to respond worse to stressors and are more likely to interpret ordinary situations, such as minor frustrations, as appearing hopelessly difficult. Their behavioral responses may include procrastination, substance use, and other maladaptive behaviors, which may aid in relieving negative emotions and generating positive ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agreeableness</span> Personality trait

Agreeableness is a personality trait referring to individuals that are perceived as kind, sympathetic, cooperative, warm, honest, and considerate. In personality psychology, agreeableness is one of the five major dimensions of personality structure, reflecting individual differences in cooperation and social harmony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dark triad</span> Offensive personality types

The dark triad is a psychological theory of personality, first published by Delroy L. Paulhus and Kevin M. Williams in 2002, that describes three notably offensive, but non-pathological personality types: Machiavellianism, sub-clinical narcissism, and sub-clinical psychopathy. Each of these personality types is called dark because each is considered to contain malevolent qualities.

Fantasy-prone personality (FPP) is a disposition or personality trait in which a person experiences a lifelong, extensive, and deep involvement in fantasy. This disposition is an attempt, at least in part, to better describe "overactive imagination" or "living in a dream world". An individual with this trait may have difficulty differentiating between fantasy and reality and may experience hallucinations, as well as self-suggested psychosomatic symptoms. Closely related psychological constructs include daydreaming, absorption and eidetic memory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extraversion and introversion</span> Personality trait

Extraversion and introversion are a central trait dimension in human personality theory. The terms were introduced into psychology by Carl Jung, though both the popular understanding and current psychological usage are not the same as Jung's original concept. Extraversion tends to be manifested in outgoing, talkative, energetic behavior, whereas introversion is manifested in more reflective and reserved behavior. Jung defined introversion as an "attitude-type characterised by orientation in life through subjective psychic contents", and extraversion as "an attitude-type characterised by concentration of interest on the external object".

Sensation seeking is a personality trait defined by the search for experiences and feelings, that are "varied, novel, rich and intense", and by the readiness to "take physical, social, legal, and financial risks for the sake of such experiences." Risk is not an essential part of the trait, as many activities associated with it are not risky. However, risk may be ignored, tolerated, or minimized and may even be considered to add to the excitement of the activity. The concept was developed by Marvin Zuckerman of the University of Delaware. In order to assess this trait he created a personality test called the Sensation Seeking Scale. This test assesses individual differences in terms of sensory stimulation preferences. So there are people who prefer a strong stimulation and display a behavior that manifests a greater desire for sensations and there are those who prefer a low sensory stimulation. The scale is a questionnaire designed to measure how much stimulation a person requires and the extent to which they enjoy the excitement. Zuckerman hypothesized that people who are high sensation seekers require a lot of stimulation to reach their Optimal Level of Arousal. When the stimulation or sensory input is not met, the person finds the experience unpleasant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HEXACO model of personality structure</span> Six-dimensional model of human personality

The HEXACO model of personality structure is a six-dimensional model of human personality that was created by Ashton and Lee and explained in their book, The H Factor of Personality, based on findings from a series of lexical studies involving several European and Asian languages. The six factors, or dimensions, include honesty-humility (H), emotionality (E), extraversion (X), agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C), and openness to experience (O). Each factor is composed of traits with characteristics indicating high and low levels of the factor. The HEXACO model was developed through similar methods as other trait taxonomies and builds on the work of Costa and McCrae and Goldberg. The model, therefore, shares several common elements with other trait models. However, the HEXACO model is unique mainly due to the addition of the honesty-humility dimension.

The Revised NEO Personality Inventory is a personality inventory that assesses an individual on five dimensions of personality. These are the same dimensions found in the Big Five personality traits. These traits are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion(-introversion), agreeableness, and neuroticism. In addition, the NEO PI-R also reports on six subcategories of each Big Five personality trait.

Within personality psychology, it has become common practice to use factor analysis to derive personality traits. The Big Five model proposes that there are five basic personality traits. These traits were derived in accordance with the lexical hypothesis. These five personality traits: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience have garnered widespread support.

Personality change refers to the different forms of change in various aspects of personality. These changes include how we experience things, how our perception of experiences changes, and how we react in situations. An individual's personality may stay somewhat consistent throughout their life. Still, more often than not, everyone undergoes some form of change to their personality in their lifetime.

The Big Five personality traits are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. The Big Five Personality is a test that people can take to learn more about their personality in relation to the five personality traits. Cross-cultural psychology as a discipline examines the way that human behavior is different and/or similar across different cultures. One important and widely studied area in this subfield of psychology is personality, particularly the study of Big Five. The Big Five model of personality has become the most extensively studied model of personality and has broad support, starting in the United States and later in many different cultures. The Big Five model of personality started in the United States, and through the years has been translated into many different languages and has been used in many countries. Some researchers were attempting to determine the differences in how other cultures perceive this model. Some research shows that the Big Five holds up across cultures even with its origin in the English language. However, there is also some evidence which suggests that the Big Five traits may not be sufficient to completely explain personality in other cultures. In countries such as South America and East Asia, the results weren't as accurate because they weren't as open as some people in other countries are.

In psychology, a facet is a specific and unique aspect of a broader personality trait. Both the concept and the term "facet" were introduced by Paul Costa and Robert McCrae in the first edition of the NEO-Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) Manual. Facets were originally elaborated only for the neuroticism, openness to experience, and extraversion traits; Costa and McCrae introduced facet scales for the agreeableness and conscientiousness traits in the Revised NEO-PI. Each of the Big Five personality traits in the five factor model contains six facets, each of which is measured with a separate scale. The use of facets and facet scales has since expanded beyond the NEO PI-R, with alternative facet and domain structures derived from other models of personality. Examples include the HEXACO model of personality structure, psycholexical studies, circumplex models, the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), and the California Psychological Inventory.

Absorption is a disposition or personality trait in which a person becomes absorbed in their mental imagery, particularly fantasy. This trait thus correlates highly with a fantasy prone personality. The original research on absorption was by Dutch American psychologist Auke Tellegen. The construct of absorption was developed in order to relate individual differences in hypnotisability to broader aspects of personality. Absorption has a variable correlation with hypnotisability (r = 0.13–0.89) perhaps because in addition to broad personality dispositions, situational factors play an important role in performance on tests of hypnotic susceptibility. Absorption is one of the traits assessed in the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire.

Intelligence and personality have traditionally been studied as separate entities in psychology, but more recent work has increasingly challenged this view. An increasing number of studies have recently explored the relationship between intelligence and personality, in particular the Big Five personality traits.

References

  1. ↑ Goldberg, L. R. (1993). "The structure of phenotypic personality traits" . American Psychologist. 48 (1): 26–34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26. PMID   8427480. S2CID   20595956.
  2. 1 2 3 McCrae, R. R.; John, O. P. (1992). "An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications". Journal of Personality. 60 (2): 175–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x. PMID   1635039. S2CID   10596836.
  3. ↑ Costa, P. T.; McCrae, R. R. (1992), NEO personality Inventory professional manual, Odessa, Fla.: Psychological Assessment Resources[ page needed ]
  4. ↑ Aitken Harris, Julie (March 2004). "Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity". Personality and Individual Differences. 36 (4): 913–929. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00161-2. ISSN   0191-8869. S2CID   144326478.
  5. 1 2 Steel, Piers; Schmidt, Joseph; Shultz, Jonas (2008). "Refining the relationship between personality and Subjective well-being" . Psychological Bulletin. 134 (1): 138–161. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138. hdl: 1880/47915 . PMID   18193998.
  6. 1 2 Malouff, John M.; Thorsteinsson, Einar B.; Schutte, Nicola S. (2005). "The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: a meta-analysis" . Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 27 (2): 101–114. doi:10.1007/s10862-005-5384-y. S2CID   145806896.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Thompson, E.R. (October 2008). "Development and Validation of an International English Big-Five Mini-Markers" . Personality and Individual Differences. 45 (6): 542–548. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.013.
  8. 1 2 Goldberg, L.R.; Johnson, J.A.; Eber, H.W.; et al. (2006). "The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures" . Journal of Research in Personality. 40 (1): 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007. S2CID   13274640.
  9. ↑ Goldberg, L. R. (1992). "The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure" . Psychological Assessment. 4 (1): 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26. S2CID   144709415.
  10. ↑ Saucier, G. (1994). "Mini-Markers – a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers" . Journal of Personality Assessment. 63 (3): 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8. PMID   7844738.
  11. ↑ Connelly, B.S.; Ones, D. S.; Chernyshenko, O. S. (2014). "Introducing the Special Section on Openness to Experience: Review of Openness Taxonomies, Measurement, and Nomological Net" . Journal of Personality Assessment. 96 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.830620. PMID   24073877. S2CID   41617495.
  12. ↑ Gosling, Sam (2008). Snoop: What your stuff says about you . New York: Basic Books. ISBN   9780465027811.[ page needed ]
  13. ↑ McRae, Tobert R. (2004). "Openness to Experience". Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. Vol. 2. Elsevier.
  14. ↑ McCrae, R. R. (1987). "Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . 52 (6): 1258–1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258. Archived from the original on 2020-08-18. Retrieved 2020-09-05.
  15. ↑
  16. 1 2 3 Moutafi, Joanna; Furnham, Adrian; Crump, John (2006). "What facets of openness and conscientiousness predict fluid intelligence score?" . Learning and Individual Differences. 16: 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.003.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Stanek, Kevin C.; Ones, Deniz S. (2023-06-06). "Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120 (23): e2212794120. Bibcode:2023PNAS..12012794S. doi:10.1073/pnas.2212794120. ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   10266031 . PMID   37252971.
  18. ↑ Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN   978-1-59147-181-3.
  19. ↑
  20. 1 2 Furnham, Adrian; Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas (2008). "Cognitive ability, learning approaches and personality correlates of general knowledge" . Educational Psychology. 28 (4): 427–437. doi:10.1080/01443410701727376. S2CID   144132702.
  21. ↑ Fleischhauer, Monica; Enge, Sören; Brocke, Burkhard; Ullrich, Johannes; Strobel, Alexander; Strobel, Anja (2010). "Same or Different? Clarifying the Relationship of Need for Cognition to Personality and Intelligence" . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36 (1): 82–96. doi:10.1177/0146167209351886. PMID   19901274. S2CID   28728034.
  22. ↑ Rocklin, Thomas (1994). "Relation Between Typical Intellectual Engagement and Openness : Comment on Goff and Ackerman (1992)" . Journal of Educational Psychology. 86 (1): 145–149. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.145.
  23. ↑ Mussell, Patrick (2010). "Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity" . Personality and Individual Differences. 49 (5): 506–510. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.014.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Phares, E.J.; Chaplin, W.F. (1997). "Personality and Intellect" . Introduction to personality (4th ed.). New York: Longman. p.  522. ISBN   978-0-673-99456-1.
  25. ↑ Tellegen, Auke; Atkinson, Gilbert (June 1974). "Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ('absorption'), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility" . Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 83 (3): 268–77. doi:10.1037/h0036681. PMID   4844914.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Glisky, Martha L.; Tataryn, Douglas J.; Tobias, Betsy A.; Kihlstrom, John F.; McConkey, Kevin M. (February 1991). "Absorption, openness to experience, and hypnotizability" . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60 (2): 263–72. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.263. PMID   2016669.
  27. ↑ Aluja, Anton; García, Óscar; García, Luis F. (2002). "A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives" . Personality and Individual Differences. 33 (5): 713–725. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00186-6.
  28. ↑ García, Luis F.; Aluja, Anton; García, Óscar; Cuevas, Lara (2005). "Is Openness to Experience an Independent Personality Dimension?" (PDF). Journal of Individual Differences. 26 (3): 132–138. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.26.3.132. S2CID   56268785. Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 2019-12-13.
  29. ↑ De Fruyt, F.; Van De Wiele, L.; Van Heeringen, C. (2000). "Cloninger's Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character and the Five-Factor Model of Personality" . Personality and Individual Differences. 29 (3): 441–452. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00204-4.
  30. ↑ Costa, Paul T.; McCrae, Robert R. (1992). "Four ways five factors are basic" . Personality and Individual Differences. 13 (6): 653–665. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I. S2CID   86867568.
  31. 1 2 McCrae, Robert R. (1994). "Openness to Experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V". European Journal of Personality. 8 (4): 251–272. doi:10.1002/per.2410080404. S2CID   144576220. Archived from the original on 2021-01-27. Retrieved 2019-09-11.
  32. ↑
  33. ↑ Butler, J. C. (2000). "Personality and emotional correlates of right-wing authoritarianism" . Social Behavior and Personality. 28: 1–14. doi:10.2224/sbp.2000.28.1.1.
  34. 1 2 3 Sibley, Chris G.; Duckitt, John (2000). "Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review" . Personality and Social Psychology Review. 12 (3): 248–279. doi:10.1177/1088868308319226. PMID   18641385. S2CID   5156899.
  35. ↑
  36. 1 2 3 4 McCrae, Robert; Sutin, Angelina R. (2009). "Openness to Experience". In Leary, Mark R.; Hoyle, Rick H. (eds.). Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior . New York/London: The Guildford Press. pp.  257–273. ISBN   978-1-59385-647-2.
  37. ↑ Osborne, Danny; Sibley, Chris G. (2020). "Does Openness to Experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology" . Journal of Research in Personality. 87. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103979. S2CID   225474743.
  38. ↑ Stephan, Yannick (2009). "Openness to experience and active older adults' life satisfaction: A trait and facet-level analysis" . Personality and Individual Differences. 47 (6): 637–641. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.025.
  39. ↑
  40. 1 2 Piedmont, Ralph L.; Sherman, Martin F.; Sherman, Nancy C. (December 2012). "Maladaptively high and low openness: the case for experiential permeability" . Journal of Personality. 80 (6): 1641–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00777.x. PMID   22320184.
  41. 1 2 Piedmont, Ralph L.; Sherman, Martin F.; Sherman, Nancy C.; Dy-Liacco, Gabriel S.; Williams, Joseph E. G. (2009). "Using the Five-Factor Model to Identify a New Personality Disorder Domain: The Case for Experiential Permeability" . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 96 (6): 1245–1258. doi:10.1037/a0015368. PMID   19469599.
  42. ↑ Saroglou, Vassilis (2002). "Religion and the five-factors of personality: A meta-analytic review" . Personality and Individual Differences. 32: 15–25. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00233-6.
  43. 1 2 Schmitt, David P.; Realo, A; Voracek, M.; Allik, J. (2008). "Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in big five personality traits across 55 cultures" . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94 (1): 168–182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168. PMID   18179326.
  44. ↑ Watson, David (2003). "To dream, perchance to remember: Individual differences in dream recall" . Personality and Individual Differences. 34 (7): 1271–1286. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00114-9.
  45. ↑ Bogaert, Anthony F (2017). "Personality and Sexual Orientation: Extension to Asexuality and the HEXACO Model" . The Journal of Sex Research. 55 (8): 951–961. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1287844. PMID   28276935. S2CID   40027879.
  46. ↑ Jang, K. L.; Livesly, W. J.; Vemon, P.A. (1996). "Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study" . Journal of Personality. 64 (3): 577–592. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00522.x. PMID   8776880. S2CID   35488176.
  47. ↑ Bouchard, Thomas J.; McGue, Matt (2003). "Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences". Journal of Neurobiology. 54 (1): 4–45. doi: 10.1002/neu.10160 . ISSN   1097-4695. PMID   12486697.
  48. ↑ DeYoung, Colin G.; Peterson, Jordan B.; Higgins, Daniel M. (2005). "Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality". Journal of Personality. 73 (4): 825–858. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x . PMID   15958136.
  49. ↑ Camperio Ciani, A. S.; Capiluppi, C.; Veronese, A.; Sartori, G. (2006). "The adaptive value of personality differences revealed by small island population dynamics" . European Journal of Personality. 21: 3–22. doi:10.1002/per.595. S2CID   143581786.
  50. ↑
  51. ↑
  52. ↑ Flory, K.; Lynam, D.; Milich, R.; Leukefeld, C.; Clayton, R. (2002). "The relations among personality, symptoms of alcohol and marijuana abuse, and symptoms of comorbid psychopathology: Results from a community sample" . Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology . 10 (4): 425–434. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.10.4.425. PMID   12498340.
  53. 1 2 MacLean, K. A.; Johnson, M. W.; Griffiths, R. R. (2011). "Mystical experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin lead to increases in the personality domain of openness". Journal of Psychopharmacology. 25 (11): 1453–1461. doi:10.1177/0269881111420188. PMC   3537171 . PMID   21956378.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.