Slow fashion is an aspect of sustainable fashion and a concept antithetical to fast fashion. It is part of the "slow movement", which advocates for clothing and apparel manufactured with respect to people, the environment, and animals. As such, contrary to fast fashion industrial practices, slow fashion involves local artisans and the use of eco-friendly materials.[1]
Slow fashion is a way to "identify sustainable fashion solutions, based on the repositioning of strategies of design, production, consumption, use, and reuse, which are emerging alongside the global fashion system, and are posing a potential challenge to it."[2]
It is an alternative to fast fashion as it promotes a more ethical and sustainable way of living and consuming.[3] "It encompasses the whole range of 'sustainable,' 'eco,' 'green,' and 'ethical' fashion movement".[4] This movement is another business model focusing on slowing down consumerism and respecting the environment and ethics.[5]
Fast and slow fashion
Slow fashion is often defined in opposition to fast fashion. Unlike fast fashion, slow fashion production ensures quality manufacturing to lengthen the life of the garment or material. Slow fashion garments emphasize the quality of the materials and product and thus are commonly more expensive. The movement demands increasing awareness from manufacturers and consumers to decrease production and consumption speed.[6] Developing connection with one's garment is important to slow fashion: consumers will keep an article of clothing longer than one season if they feel emotionally or culturally connected to the article of clothing.[7] A taxation is in early stages of development[by whom?] in order to deter fashion companies from purchasing or producing materials that are not made with recycled, organic, or re-purposed materials.[8] Ideally, utilizing materials pre-manufactured will reduce the industry's carbon footprint.[8]
Slow fashion is part of a movement [among whom?] which aims to make companies more transparent about manufacturing processes and the environmental cost. Many sustainable fashion companies are transparent, from manufacturing to retail, with the aim of assisting buyers in making more eco-conscious purchasing decisions.[9] This trend [among whom?] towards more conscious buying is also a means by which sustainable companies attract new customers.
Authors
The idea of slow fashion became significant after Elizabeth L. Cline published Overdressed: The Shockingly High Cost of Cheap Clothing,[10] which heightened awareness of the detriments of fast fashion. The term "slow clothes movement" was coined by Angela Murrills, a fashion writer for Georgia Straight, a Vancouver-based online news magazine,[2] and was adopted on blogs and the internet[11]
The expression "slow fashion" was also used in an article by Kate Fletcher published in The Ecologist in 2007, where she compared the eco/sustainable/ethical fashion industry to the slow food movement:[12]
The concept of slow fashion borrows heavily from the Slow Food Movement. Founded by Carlo Petrini in Italy in 1986, Slow Food links pleasure and food with awareness and responsibility. It defends biodiversity in our food supply by opposing the standardisation of taste, defends the need for consumer information and protects cultural identities tied to food. It has spawned a wealth of other slow movements. Slow Cities, for example, design with slow values but within the context of a town or city and a commitment to improve its citizens' quality of life.[13]
Slow Food Movement advocates the following principles:[14]
Good: quality, flavorsome and healthy food
Clean: production that does not harm the environment
Fair: accessible prices for consumers and fair conditions and pay for producers
The slow fashion movement has been studied by Fletcher, a researcher, author, consultant, and design activist, and the author of Sustainable Fashion and Textiles. Her writings integrate design, fashion, and textiles as a necessary way to move towards a more sustainable fashion industry.
Based on the three principles of slow design that were created in 2006 in Milan, Hazel Clark, in SLOW + FASHION - an Oxymoron - or a Promise for the Future...?[2] defined the principles of the Slow Fashion Movement:[4]
Taking a local approach
Having a transparent production system
Making sustainable and sensorial products
In 2019, Debapratim Purkayastha provided an example of an operative in the slow fashion industry a case study, 7Weaves.[15] The Assam-based social venture deals in sustainably sourced and manufactured Eri silk products by working with both the forest-dependent indigenous people in the region and global slow fashion brands in the West.[16][17] The Eri silk is manufactured without killing the silk worm, and 7Weaves used only natural dyes when coloring the material.[18]
The model provided sustainable livelihood to the artisan who had traditional knowledge in handloom and sericulture.[19] 7Weaves provides guaranteed work for artisans at a fixed monthly emolument for the whole year, and redistributed 50 percent of its annual profits to the artisans and other players in the supply chain.[16] 7Weaves's was also able to preserve the biodiversity of the ecologically fragile Assam valley region.[20] Slow fashion brands from countries including Germany, France, Belgium and Australia source garments and fabrics from 7Weaves. 7Weaves's focus on sustainably sourced fair trade fabrics that were long-lasting and locally produced, use of traditional values and skills, preservation of the local ecosystem, source diversity, and responsible business practices emphasizes its slow fashion credentials.[21]
Context
In 2009, Vogue and The VOU Fashion Magazines traced the history of the context of the Slow Fashion Movement.[4]
In March 1990, the New York Times and Vogue published articles about the environmental trend in the fashion world. In the summer of 1990, British fashion designer Katharine Hamnett, who has been often recognized as one of the first designers to combine environmental activism with fashion, gave a speech about the environmental impacts of fashion at the United Nations. In 1995, Giorgio Armani began to use hemp in his Emporio Armani collection. In 2001, Natalie Chanin launched Project Alabama, a collection of 200 locally produced hand-sewn T-shirts that was well received at New York Fashion Week. The same year, Stella McCartney launched her own line, applying animal-friendly (no leather, no fur) policies.[4]
In recent years, many companies have supported movements advocating a shift away from fast fashion, such as Fashion Revolution Day and Second Hand September campaigns. This has led to major fast fashion retailers such as Zara and H&M to either pledge major change in the future[22] or launch a clothing line[23] dedicated to sustainable clothing.
Marketing
Slow fashion has its own marketing strategies, as it targets consumers expecting classic and timeless pieces of clothes. Thus, pieces emphasize versatility, low maintenance and high quality.[5]
Marketing strategies concerning slow fashion often revolve around a more conscious consumption, focusing the advertising on environmentally and socially sustainable aspects on the clothes. Companies use several strategies in order to be less wasteful than other fast fashion brands:[24]
changing their clothing lines less often
producing and stocking fewer items
paying attention to the material that they use
ensuring ethical and non-exploitative methods of production
Slow fashion is also often associated with vintage and second-hand clothing from thrift shops, to the extent that they offer clothes that are not produced within a just-in-time flow and do not compromise the environment for cheaper clothing.
Global economy
The production process is divided worldwide to maximize efficiency and profit. Slow fashion is more time-consuming, local, and quality-oriented. Therefore, it is not always competitive.[25] Several papers question the longevity of slow fashion in a market-driven society.[2][11]
Production
In slow fashion, designers are encouraged to produce locally, using local workforces and resources.[25] Quality is prioritized over quantity. The production chain is intended to be as transparent as possible. This redefines the hierarchy between designers, consumers and producers.[2] Fast fashion is typically ruled by trends that come and go quickly, encouraging consumption. The end products offered to clients by slow fashion designers are made to last longer and be timeless.
Slow fashion has different production costs and cannot produce as much in quantity. Slow fashion cannot compete with the mass produced products of fast fashion that use cheap labor and resources to maximize profits. Slow fashion is very local and uses fair-trade materials and fabrics of high quality.[11] Moreover, slow fashion cannot produced as much as fast fashion due to the different production process.[11] Many academic papers have looked into the viability of this movement in an era of mass-production and mass-consumption.
By keeping the production in "productive communities", this process is more transparent. There is less intermediation and a greater cultural and material value to the consumer. This is one of the ways Clarke presents to address the question of how slow fashion fit into the current economic model.[2] Recently, a carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chains has been implemented to encourage the use of local supplies. The effect of these measures has been limited.[26]
Pricing
The pricing of slow fashion clothing varies. Since the definition is broad, a second-hand dress from a thrift shop worth five dollars and a designer dress costing 700 dollars can both be considered slow fashion.[11]
The current economic system focuses on economic growth and quantity sold. However, research has shown that more parameters should be included due to a raising social conscience.[27] People have expressed willingness to pay more for clothes when they know that they have been produced with "sweat-free" manufacturing.[25]
Impact
The slow fashion movement, part of the greater goal of sustainable fashion and thus, a cleaner world is gaining strength, driven by growing environmental concerns. In 2018, a third of fashion consumers bought clothing once a month, a decrease from 37% compared to 2016, whereas those buying clothes every two or three months or less rose from 64% to 67%, according to the market research firm Mintel.[28]
After the release of the documentaries The True Cost and RiverBlue, there was attention drawn to companies that have fast fashion practices. Despite the spread movement, H&M had revenues amount to $25 billion in the fiscal year of 2016. However, as the movement has grown in popularity, H&M's stock and brand image has taken a hit as consumer awareness has spread of their environmentally unethical practices leading to a drop in sales.[29]
The spread of the movement has resulted in two fast fashion giants, Zara and H&M, switching narratives to become advocates for ethical fashion practices. With collections aimed at sustainable fashions, the two companies have shifted towards more ethical practices.[30] Due to the audience that the movement against unethical fashion practices has accumulated, organizations such as the United States Fashion Industry Association have devoted some of their attention to "social compliance and sustainability".[31]
Critics
Critics have called out against certain brands who have claimed to strive to follow slow fashion's principles. For example, Swedish brand H&M was accused of not being sustainable when reports found out that it burns its unsold clothes. While H&M is striving to create sustainability to the best of their abilities, they are still overproducing mass amounts of clothing while hawking it as sustainable. H&M has a stated "sustainability strategy", and brands some items with green "Conscious" tags to signal that they contain "more sustainable materials".[32] Where a company is untruthfully claiming sustainability, it is often called greenwashing.
↑ Choi, Tsan-Ming (September 2013). "Carbon footprint tax on fashion supply chain systems". The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 68 (1–4): 835–847. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-4947-4. ISSN0268-3768. S2CID110199159.
↑ Thorpe, Ann. (2012). Architecture and design versus consumerism: how design activism confronts growth. Abingdon, Oxon: Earthscan. ISBN9781849713559. OCLC758394577.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
