Gulf | |
---|---|
(proposed) | |
Geographic distribution | Gulf Coast, United States |
Linguistic classification | Proposed language family |
Subdivisions | |
Glottolog | None |
The Gulf languages are a proposed family of native North American languages composed of the Muskogean languages, along with four language isolates: Natchez, Tunica, Atakapa, and (possibly) Chitimacha.
Gulf was proposed as a language family by Mary Haas (Haas 1951, [1] 1952 [2] ), but the family has not been rigorously established by the comparative method. Historical linguists such as Lyle Campbell (Campbell and Mithun 1979, [3] Campbell 1997 [4] ) list the relationship as unproven, though a number of Muskogean scholars believe that Muskogean is at least related to Natchez (Campbell 1997:305).
However, the Gulf hypothesis is considered by a number of specialists on Muskogean languages, including Mary Haas and Pamela Munro. Munro (1995) has regarded the hypothesis of a Gulf family of languages as promising; Haas thought the closest language to Muskogean would be Natchez, followed by Tunica, Atakapa, and, rather dubiously, Chitimacha. [5] A difficulty in evaluating the hypothesis is the lack of available data. Most of the data on Chitimacha and Natchez is still unpublished and held in archives.
Additionally, Haas (1958) proposed that the Gulf languages are related to the Algonquian languages. [6]
Lexical comparisons by Kimball (1994) showing areal similarities among the "Gulf" languages: [7] : 35–38
gloss | Proto-Muskogean | Tunica |
---|---|---|
sibling of opposite sex | *xaya | -áhaya 'sister-in-law' |
to want | *kʷanna | -wána |
big gray heron | *watola | wátoru-hki 'whooping crane' |
fruit; to bear fruit | *aθi | ʔélu |
willow | osí (Koasati) | ʔx̌ša |
gloss | Tunica | Natchez |
---|---|---|
to stick in | čáhka | cak- |
to drip | čólu | col- |
corn | háhka | haku |
to gulp | kɔ́ra | kolkol- |
to put in the mouth | káhpu | hi-kap- |
chicken | kápaši | kapaꞏht(i) |
wild goose | lálahki | láꞏlak |
to fart | píhču | pic- |
to shine | réma | leM- |
to snore | róhku | loꞏk- |
sassafras | rɔ́wasi | waꞏ |
to blow the nose | šímu | šiꞏM- |
to blow (of wind) | wíhu | *wiꞏW- |
wild potato | ʔɔ́ška- | ʔac |
to cough | ʔúhu | ʔohoꞏ- |
like, resembling | -nahku | -neke |
intestines | -yóni | ʔuꞏnuh |
gloss | Tunica | Chitimacha |
---|---|---|
man / men | ší | ʔasi / ʔayš |
ear | -ála-wɛ́ča | waʔaš |
kingfisher | čárina | čana |
cypress | háhku | ʔak-šuš |
to die | lúpi | nuꞏp- |
war | náka | nakš |
gloss | Tunica | Atakapa |
---|---|---|
black | méli | meːl |
to call | wáli | wan |
gloss | Natchez | Proto-Muskogean |
---|---|---|
to buy | ciꞏp-hakiʔiš | *čoʔpa |
pine tree | col | *čolyi |
squash | coꞏY | *tahayo |
fox / bark or yelp like a fox | kaWkup | *kaxʷ-ka |
six | lahanaW | *xana-li |
perch / fish | šaꞏš(i) | *θaθi-xo |
wife | ʔaꞏL | *xalki |
tooth | ʔeNt | *innoti |
ten | ʔoꞏko | *poko-li |
nothing but | -aꞏnah | (Koasati) -nánna |
ergative / nominative | -c | -*t |
absolutive / accusative | -n | -*n |
gloss | Natchez | Chitimacha |
---|---|---|
water / liquid | kuN | kuꞏ |
hundred | puꞏp | puꞏp |
cow | waštaꞏN | waštik |
spider web | weykoL | way’ |
to hear | ʔeꞏp-le-halʔiš | wopi- |
vulture | ʔoꞏši | ʔoꞏš |
twenty / two | ʔoꞏk-ahp | ʔupa |
gloss | Natchez | Atakapa |
---|---|---|
name | ʔinu | eːŋ |
persimmon | ʔoꞏ | oːl |
gloss | Chitimacha | Atakapa |
---|---|---|
ten | heyč’i | hišiŋ |
liver | kesi | keːc(k) |
woman | kiča | kiš |
gourd | kupu | kipaco |
earth | ney | neː |
Spanish moss | siꞏc | šiːt |
mulberry | sisč’up | ses |
beaver | ʔaꞏci | oc |
gloss | Atakapa | Proto-Muskogean |
---|---|---|
shell | iwal | xʷolo |
gloss | Tunica | Proto-Muskogean | Natchez |
---|---|---|---|
red-headed woodpecker | čuhčuhina | *čaxčahka | cawcah |
pileated woodpecker | páhpahkana | *kʷahkʷa-ka | pakpakuꞏ-šiꞏL |
robin (Quapaw šį́kkokkóke) | wiškʔohku | *č/kʷiskoko | miškokʷ |
breast | ʔúču | *piči 'suckle; breasts' | šuꞏ |
gloss | Tunica | Chitimacha | Natchez | Atakapa | Proto-Muskogean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
hackberry | kó- | kamu | koŋ | ||
negative | -ʔaha | -haꞏt | -hah | ||
wind | húri | howi | hi | ||
uncle | waʔa / waꞏ | ʔaweh | wahš | ||
hand | ʔiꞏš | waši | woːš / wiːš | ||
to give | ʔaꞏ- | ha-ku-ši-ʔiš | *im-aka | ||
skunk | šíki | kištʔeʔe | šic | šikitiš |
Some lexical similarities between the Algonquian and Gulf languages given by Haas (1958): [6]
gloss | Proto- Central Algonquian | Proto-Muskogean | Natchez | Tunica | Chitimacha | Atakapa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
beat | *pak- | — | paꞏk- | pɛ́ka | — | pak |
cold | *tahk- | — | takap- | láka | č’aki | — |
cut | *kiꞏšk- | *kač- | kec- | káhču | — | kec |
die | *nepe- | *ili- | — | lúpi | nuꞏp- | (pih) |
fish | *nameꞏ- | *ɴaɴi/u | ʔeɴ | níni | (ni-) | nti |
hand | *-neθk-i | *-mkʷi | — | -hkeni | nok | |
name | *-iꞏn- | — | ʔinu | — | nuy-t- | eŋ |
neck | *-hkweꞏ- | — | kʷaht | — | k’eʔ | koy |
night | *tepeθk- | — | tewe | láwu | t’apk’i | iti |
one | *kwet-; *nekwet- | — | wiꞏt- | ʔunk’u | (ta)nuk | |
scrape | *kaꞏšk- | *kaꞏs- | koꞏc- | kɔ́sa | k’atka- | kau-š |
see | *neꞏw- | — | ʔeʟ- | hɛ́ra | heč-t- | ini |
sharp(en) | *kiꞏn-t- | *xʷulut- | pilit- | kíri | kihci | kini |
shoot | *pemw-, *-el- | — | -epenel- | — | paꞏhma- | pem |
split | *paꞏθk- | *paƚ- | paꞏʟ- | pása | [č]ap-t- | paƚ |
swallow | *kwan- | *kʷalak- | -akun- | kɔ́ra | kaꞏč-t- | kul |
tail | *-aθany- | *haci | ʔisi | -ása | mahči | — |
three | *neʔθ- | — | neꞏ- | ʔéni- | — | lat |
through | *šaꞏpw- | *ƚuput- | — | šíhpu | — | ƚop |
tree | *meʔtekw- | *itti/u | cuꞏ | ríhku | šuš | — |
turn | *kwetekw- | — | kitip- | kúra | kut’ih-t- | — |
Below are pronouns comparisons by Geoffrey Kimball (1994) showing areal similarities among the "Gulf" languages. [7] : 39 Note that Tunica distinguishes masculine and feminine pronominal forms.
gloss | Proto-Muskogean | Tunica | Natchez | Chitimacha | Atakapa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | *ano | ʔíma | takeꞏha | ʔiš | wiš |
you | *ično | má (M); hɛ́ma (F) | ʔakahni | himʔ | naš |
s/he | — | ʔúwi (M); tíhci (F) | ʔišina | hus | haːš |
we | *posno | ʔinima | takahniꞏ | ʔus | yukitiš |
you (pl) | *hačno | wínima (M); hínima (F) | ʔaNkahniꞏ | was | nakit |
they | — | sɛ́ma (M); sínima (F) | ʔišinaꞏniꞏ | hunks | hakitiš |
gloss | Proto-Muskogean | Tunica | Natchez | Chitimacha | Atakapa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
my | *ca- / *am- | ʔi- | -niš | ʔiš | wi |
your | *či- / *čim- | wi- (M); hi-, he- (F) | -piš | himʔ | na |
her / his | *i- / *im- | ʔu- (M); ti- (F) | -ʔiš | hus | ha |
our | *po- / pom- | ʔi-n | — | ʔus | yukit |
your (pl) | *hači- / *hačim- | wi-n- (M); hi-n- (F) | — | was | nakit |
their | — | si- (M); si-n- (F) | — | hunks | hakit |
gloss | Proto-Muskogean | Tunica | Natchez | Chitimacha | Atakapa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | *-li | -ni | ta- / ya- / ʔa- (ka-) | -ki | -o |
you | *ič- / *či- | wí- (M); hɛ́- (F) | pan- / pi- / paꞏ- | -iʔi | naš |
s/he | *Ø- | ʔú- (M); ʔá- (F) | na- / ʔi- / ʔaꞏ- | -iʔi | haš |
we | *il- / -*li | ʔína- | -naka | -cel | |
you (pl) | *hač- / *-hači | wína- (M); hɛ́na- (F) | — | -naʔa | -tem |
they | *Ø | ʔúna- (M); sina- (F) | — | -naʔa | -oɬ |
gloss | Proto-Muskogean | Tunica | Natchez | Chitimacha | Atakapa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | *ca- | ʔihk- | -t- | -ki- | hi |
you | *či- | wihk- (M); hihk- (F) | -p- | -Ø- | n |
s/he | *Ø- | ʔuhk- (M); tihk- (F) | -Ø- | -Ø- | ha |
we | *po- | ʔink- | — | -kuy- | iš |
you (pl) | *hači- | wink- (M); hink- (F) | — | -Ø- | nak- |
they | — | sihk- (M); sink- (F) | — | -Ø- | šak- |
reflexive | *ili- | — | -hši- | hat- | |
reciprocal | *ixti- | ʔak- | -tahn- | — | hok- |
gloss | Proto-Muskogean | Tunica | Natchez | Chitimacha | Atakapa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | *ca- | ʔi- | -t- | -ki- | hi |
you | *či- | wi- (M); hi- (F) | -p- | -Ø- | n |
s/he | *Ø- | ʔu- (M); ti- (F) | -Ø- | -Ø- | Ø- |
we | *po- | ʔi-n | — | -kuy- | ic- |
you (pl) | *hači- | wi-n- (M); hi-n- (F) | — | -Ø- | — |
they | — | si- (M); si-n- (F) | — | -Ø- | Ø- |
Mobilian Jargon was a pidgin used as a lingua franca among Native American groups living along the Gulf of Mexico around the time of European settlement of the region. It was the main language among Native tribes in this area, mainly Louisiana. There is evidence indicating its existence as early as the late 17th to early 18th century. The Native groups that are said to have used it were the Alabama, Apalachee, Biloxi, Chacato, Pakana, Pascagoula, Taensa, Tunica, Caddo, Chickasaw, Houma, Choctaw, Chitimacha, Natchez, and Ofo. The name is thought to refer to the Mobile Indians of the central Gulf Coast, but did not originate from this group; Mobilian Jargon is linguistically and grammatically different from the language traditionally spoken by the Mobile Indians.
The Algonquian languages are a subfamily of the Indigenous languages of the Americas and most of the languages in the Algic language family are included in the group. The name of the Algonquian language family is distinguished from the orthographically similar Algonquin dialect of the Indigenous Ojibwe language (Chippewa), which is a senior member of the Algonquian language family. The term Algonquin has been suggested to derive from the Maliseet word elakómkwik, "they are our relatives/allies".
A language isolate is a language that has no demonstrable genetic relationship with any other languages. Basque in Europe, Ainu in Asia, Sandawe in Africa, Haida and Zuni in North America, Kanoê in South America, and Tiwi in Australia are all examples of language isolates. The exact number of language isolates is yet unknown due to insufficient data on several languages.
The Indigenous languages of the Americas are a diverse group of languages that originated in the Americas prior to colonization, many of which continue to be spoken. Over a thousand of these languages are still used today, while many more are now extinct. The Indigenous languages of the Americas are not all related to each other; instead, they are classified into a hundred or so language families, as well as a number of extinct languages that are unclassified due to the lack of information on them.
The Algic languages are an indigenous language family of North America. Most Algic languages belong to the Algonquian subfamily, dispersed over a broad area from the Rocky Mountains to Atlantic Canada. The other Algic languages are the Yurok and Wiyot of northwestern California, which, despite their geographic proximity, are not closely related. All these languages descend from Proto-Algic, a second-order proto-language estimated to have been spoken about 7,000 years ago and reconstructed using the reconstructed Proto-Algonquian language and the Wiyot and Yurok languages.
Amerind is a hypothetical higher-level language family proposed by Joseph Greenberg in 1960 and elaborated by his student Merritt Ruhlen. Greenberg proposed that all of the indigenous languages of the Americas belong to one of three language families, the previously established Eskimo–Aleut and Na–Dene, and with everything else—otherwise classified by specialists as belonging to dozens of independent families—as Amerind. Due to a large number of methodological flaws in the 1987 book Language in the Americas, the relationships he proposed between these languages have been rejected by the majority of historical linguists as spurious.
The Caddoan languages are a family of languages native to the Great Plains spoken by tribal groups of the central United States, from present-day North Dakota south to Oklahoma. All Caddoan languages are critically endangered, as the number of speakers has declined markedly due to colonial legacy, lack of support, and other factors.
The Macro-Siouan languages are a proposed language family that includes the Siouan, Iroquoian, and Caddoan families. Most linguists remain unconvinced that these languages share a genetic relationship, and the existence of a Macro-Siouan language family remains a subject of debate.
Uto-Aztecan languages are a family of indigenous languages of the Americas, consisting of over thirty languages. Uto-Aztecan languages are found almost entirely in the Western United States and Mexico. The name of the language family reflects the common ancestry of the Ute language of Utah and the Nahuan languages of Mexico.
Muskogean is a Native American language family spoken in different areas of the Southeastern United States. Though the debate concerning their interrelationships is ongoing, the Muskogean languages are generally divided into two branches, Eastern Muskogean and Western Muskogean. Typologically, Muskogean languages are agglutinative. One documented language, Apalachee, is extinct and the remaining languages are critically endangered.
Plateau Penutian is a family of languages spoken in northern California, reaching through central-western Oregon to northern Washington and central-northern Idaho.
Atakapa is an extinct language isolate native to southwestern Louisiana and nearby coastal eastern Texas. It was spoken by the Atakapa people. The language became extinct in the early 20th century.
Siouan or Siouan–Catawban is a language family of North America that is located primarily in the Great Plains, Ohio and Mississippi valleys and southeastern North America with a few other languages in the east.
The Avoyel or Avoyelles were a small Native American tribe who at the time of European contact inhabited land near the mouth of the Red River at its confluence with the Atchafalaya River near present-day Marksville, Louisiana. The Avoyel are a member of the federally recognized Native American tribe and sovereign nation of the Tunica Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana.
The Natchez language is the ancestral language of the Natchez people who historically inhabited Mississippi and Louisiana, and who now mostly live among the Muscogee and Cherokee peoples in Oklahoma. The language is considered to be either unrelated to other indigenous languages of the Americas or distantly related to the Muskogean languages.
The Yuki–Wappo or Yukian languages are a small language family of western California consisting of two distantly related languages, both now extinct.
The Plains Algonquian languages are commonly grouped together as a subgroup of the larger Algonquian family, itself a member of the Algic family. Though the grouping is often encountered in the literature, it is an areal grouping rather than a genetic one. In other words, the languages are grouped together because they were spoken near one another, not because they are more closely related to one another than to any other Algonquian language. Most studies indicate that within the Algonquian family, only Eastern Algonquian constitutes a separate genetic subgroup.
The Central Algonquian languages are commonly grouped together as a subgroup of the larger Algonquian family, itself a member of the Algic family. Though the grouping is often encountered in the literature, it is an areal grouping, not a genetic grouping. In other words, the languages are grouped together because they were spoken near one another, not because they are more closely related to one another than to other Algonquian languages. Within the Algonquian family, only Eastern Algonquian is a valid genealogical group.
The indigenous languages of the Americas form various linguistic areas or Sprachbunds that share various common (areal) traits. The following list of linguistic areas is primarily based on Campbell.
The Takelma–Kalapuyan languages are a proposed small language family that comprises the Kalapuyan languages and Takelma, which are spoken in the Willamette Valley and the Rogue Valley in the U.S. state of Oregon.