Gulf languages

Last updated
Gulf
(hypothetical)
Geographic
distribution
Gulf Coast, United States
Linguistic classification Proposed language family
Subdivisions
Glottolog None

The Gulf languages are a proposed family of native North American languages composed of the Muskogean languages, along with four language isolates: Natchez, Tunica, Atakapa, and (possibly) Chitimacha.

Contents

History of proposal

Gulf was proposed as a language family by Mary Haas (Haas 1951, [1] 1952 [2] ), but the family has not been rigorously established by the comparative method. Historical linguists such as Lyle Campbell (Campbell and Mithun 1979, [3] Campbell 1997 [4] ) list the relationship as unproven, though a number of Muskogean scholars believe that Muskogean is at least related to Natchez (Campbell 1997:305).

However, the Gulf hypothesis is considered by a number of specialists on Muskogean languages, including Mary Haas and Pamela Munro. Munro (1995) has regarded the hypothesis of a Gulf family of languages as promising; Haas thought the closest language to Muskogean would be Natchez, followed by Tunica, Atakapa, and, rather dubiously, Chitimacha. [5] A difficulty in evaluating the hypothesis is the lack of available data. Most of the data on Chitimacha and Natchez is still unpublished and held in archives.

Additionally, Haas (1958) proposed that the Gulf languages are related to the Algonquian languages. [6]

Lexical comparisons

Lexical comparisons by Kimball (1994) showing areal similarities among the "Gulf" languages: [7] :35–38

gloss Proto-Muskogean Tunica
sibling of opposite sex*xaya-áhaya 'sister-in-law'
to want*kʷanna-wána
big gray heron*watolawátoru-hki 'whooping crane'
fruit; to bear fruit*aθiʔélu
willow osí (Koasati)ʔx̌ša
glossTunicaNatchez
to stick inčáhkacak-
to dripčólucol-
cornháhkahaku
to gulpkɔ́rakolkol-
to put in the mouthkáhpuhi-kap-
chickenkápašikapaꞏht(i)
wild gooselálahkiláꞏlak
to fartpíhčupic-
to shinerémaleM-
to snoreróhkuloꞏk-
sassafras rɔ́wasiwaꞏ
to blow the nosešímušiꞏM-
to blow (of wind)wíhu*wiꞏW-
wild potato ʔɔ́ška-ʔac
to coughʔúhuʔohoꞏ-
like, resembling-nahku-neke
intestines-yóniʔuꞏnuh
glossTunicaChitimacha
man / menšíʔasi / ʔayš
ear-ála-wɛ́čawaʔaš
kingfisher čárinačana
cypress háhkuʔak-šuš
to dielúpinuꞏp-
warnákanakš
glossTunicaAtakapa
blackmélimeːl
to callwáliwan
glossNatchezProto-Muskogean
to buyciꞏp-hakiʔiš*čoʔpa
pine treecol*čolyi
squash coꞏY*tahayo
fox / bark or yelp like a foxkaWkup*kaxʷ-ka
sixlahanaW*xana-li
perch / fishšaꞏš(i)*θaθi-xo
wifeʔaꞏL*xalki
toothʔeNt*innoti
tenʔoꞏko*poko-li
nothing but-aꞏnah(Koasati) -nánna
ergative / nominative-c-*t
absolutive / accusative-n-*n
glossNatchezChitimacha
water / liquidkuNkuꞏ
hundredpuꞏppuꞏp
cowwaštaꞏNwaštik
spider webweykoLway’
to hearʔeꞏp-le-halʔišwopi-
vultureʔoꞏšiʔoꞏš
twenty / twoʔoꞏk-ahpʔupa
glossNatchezAtakapa
nameʔinueːŋ
persimmon ʔoꞏoːl
glossChitimachaAtakapa
tenheyč’ihišiŋ
liverkesikeːc(k)
womankičakiš
gourdkupukipaco
earthneyneː
Spanish moss siꞏcšiːt
mulberry sisč’upses
beaverʔaꞏcioc
glossAtakapaProto-Muskogean
shelliwalxʷolo
glossTunicaProto-MuskogeanNatchez
red-headed woodpecker čuhčuhina*čaxčahkacawcah
pileated woodpecker páhpahkana*kʷahkʷa-kapakpakuꞏ-šiꞏL
robin (Quapaw šį́kkokkóke)wiškʔohku*č/kʷiskokomiškokʷ
breastʔúču*piči 'suckle; breasts'šuꞏ
glossTunicaChitimachaNatchezAtakapaProto-Muskogean
hackberry kó-kamukoŋ
negative-ʔaha-haꞏt-hah
windhúrihowihi
unclewaʔa / waꞏʔawehwahš
handʔiꞏšwašiwoːš / wiːš
to giveʔaꞏ-ha-ku-ši-ʔiš*im-aka
skunkšíkikištʔeʔešicšikitiš

Comparisons with Algonquian

Some lexical similarities between the Algonquian and Gulf languages given by Haas (1958): [6]

gloss Proto-
Central Algonquian
Proto-Muskogean NatchezTunicaChitimachaAtakapa
beat*pak-paꞏk-pɛ́kapak
cold*tahk-takap-lákač’aki
cut*kiꞏšk-*kač-kec-káhčukec
die*nepe-*ili-lúpinuꞏp-(pih)
fish*nameꞏ-*ɴaɴi/uʔeɴníni(ni-)nti
hand*-neθk-i*-mkʷi-hkeninok
name*-iꞏn-ʔinunuy-t-
neck*-hkweꞏ-kʷahtk’eʔkoy
night*tepeθk-teweláwut’apk’iiti
one*kwet-; *nekwet-wiꞏt-ʔunk’u(ta)nuk
scrape*kaꞏšk-*kaꞏs-koꞏc-kɔ́sak’atka-kau-š
see*neꞏw-ʔeʟ-hɛ́raheč-t-ini
sharp(en)*kiꞏn-t-*xʷulut-pilit-kírikihcikini
shoot*pemw-, *-el--epenel-paꞏhma-pem
split*paꞏθk-*paƚ-paꞏʟ-pása[č]ap-t-paƚ
swallow*kwan-*kʷalak--akun-kɔ́rakaꞏč-t-kul
tail*-aθany-*haciʔisi-ásamahči
three*neʔθ-neꞏ-ʔéni-lat
through*šaꞏpw-*ƚuput-šíhpuƚop
tree*meʔtekw-*itti/ucuꞏríhkušuš
turn*kwetekw-kitip-kúrakut’ih-t-

Pronoun comparisons

Below are pronouns comparisons by Geoffrey Kimball (1994) showing areal similarities among the "Gulf" languages. [7] :39 Note that Tunica distinguishes masculine and feminine pronominal forms.

Independent pronouns
glossProto-MuskogeanTunicaNatchezChitimachaAtakapa
I*anoʔímatakeꞏhaʔišwiš
you*ičnomá (M); hɛ́ma (F)ʔakahnihimʔnaš
s/heʔúwi (M); tíhci (F)ʔišinahushaːš
we*posnoʔinimatakahniꞏʔusyukitiš
you (pl)*hačnowínima (M); hínima (F)ʔaNkahniꞏwasnakit
theysɛ́ma (M); sínima (F)ʔišinaꞏniꞏhunkshakitiš
Possessive pronouns
glossProto-MuskogeanTunicaNatchezChitimachaAtakapa
my*ca- / *am-ʔi--nišʔišwi
your*či- / *čim-wi- (M); hi-, he- (F)-pišhimʔna
her / his*i- / *im-ʔu- (M); ti- (F)-ʔišhusha
our*po- / pom-ʔi-nʔusyukit
your (pl)*hači- / *hačim-wi-n- (M); hi-n- (F)wasnakit
theirsi- (M); si-n- (F)hunkshakit
Agentive pronouns
glossProto-MuskogeanTunicaNatchezChitimachaAtakapa
I*-li-nita- / ya- / ʔa- (ka-)-ki-o
you*ič- / *či-wí- (M); hɛ́- (F)pan- / pi- / paꞏ--iʔinaš
s/he*Ø-ʔú- (M); ʔá- (F)na- / ʔi- / ʔaꞏ--iʔihaš
we*il- / -*liʔína--naka-cel
you (pl)*hač- / *-hačiwína- (M); hɛ́na- (F)-naʔa-tem
theyʔúna- (M); sina- (F)-naʔa-oɬ
Patient pronouns
glossProto-MuskogeanTunicaNatchezChitimachaAtakapa
I*ca-ʔihk--t--ki-hi
you*či-wihk- (M); hihk- (F)-p--Ø-n
s/he*Ø-ʔuhk- (M); tihk- (F)-Ø--Ø-ha
we*po-ʔink--kuy-
you (pl)*hači-wink- (M); hink- (F)-Ø-nak-
theysihk- (M); sink- (F)-Ø-šak-
reflexive*ili--hši-hat-
reciprocal*ixti-ʔak--tahn-hok-
Stative verb subject pronouns
glossProto-MuskogeanTunicaNatchezChitimachaAtakapa
I*ca-ʔi--t--ki-hi
you*či-wi- (M); hi- (F)-p--Ø-n
s/he*Ø-ʔu- (M); ti- (F)-Ø--Ø-Ø-
we*po-ʔi-n-kuy-ic-
you (pl)*hači-wi-n- (M); hi-n- (F)-Ø-
theysi- (M); si-n- (F)-Ø-Ø-

See also

Related Research Articles

Mobilian Jargon was a pidgin used as a lingua franca among Native American groups living along the Gulf of Mexico around the time of European settlement of the region. It was the main language among Indian tribes in this area, mainly Louisiana. There is evidence indicating its existence as early as the late 17th to early 18th century. The Indian groups that are said to have used it were the Alabama, Apalachee, Biloxi, Chacato, Pakana, Pascagoula, Taensa, Tunica, Caddo, Chickasaw, Houma, Choctaw, Chitimacha, Natchez, and Ofo. The name is thought to refer to the Mobile Indians of the central Gulf Coast, but did not originate from this group; Mobilian Jargon is linguistically and grammatically different from the language traditionally spoken by the Mobile Indians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Algonquian languages</span> Subfamily of the Algic languages of North America

The Algonquian languages are a subfamily of the Indigenous languages of the Americas and most of the languages in the Algic language family are included in the group. The name of the Algonquian language family is distinguished from the orthographically similar Algonquin dialect of the Indigenous Ojibwe language (Chippewa), which is a senior member of the Algonquian language family. The term Algonquin has been suggested to derive from the Maliseet word elakómkwik, "they are our relatives/allies". A number of Algonquian languages are considered extinct languages by the modern linguistic definition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Language isolate</span> Language that has no demonstrable genetic relationship with another language

A language isolate is a language that has no demonstrable genetic relationship with another language. Basque in Europe, Ainu in Asia, Sandawe in Africa, Haida and Zuni in North America, Kanoê in South America, and Tiwi in Australia are all examples of language isolates. The exact number of language isolates is yet unknown due to insufficient data on several languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indigenous languages of the Americas</span>

The Indigenous languages of the Americas are the languages that were used by the Indigenous peoples of the Americas before the arrival of non-Indigenous peoples. Over a thousand of these languages are still used today, while many more are now extinct. The Indigenous languages of the Americas are not all related to each other, instead they are classified into a hundred or so language families, as well as a number of extinct languages that are unclassified due to the lack of information on them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Algic languages</span> Indigenous language family of North America

The Algic languages are an indigenous language family of North America. Most Algic languages belong to the Algonquian subfamily, dispersed over a broad area from the Rocky Mountains to Atlantic Canada. The other Algic languages are the Yurok and Wiyot of northwestern California, which, despite their geographic proximity, are not closely related. All these languages descend from Proto-Algic, a second-order proto-language estimated to have been spoken about 7,000 years ago and reconstructed using the reconstructed Proto-Algonquian language and the Wiyot and Yurok languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penutian languages</span> Proposed language family

Penutian is a proposed grouping of language families that includes many Native American languages of western North America, predominantly spoken at one time in British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and California. The existence of a Penutian stock or phylum has been the subject of debate among specialists. Even the unity of some of its component families has been disputed. Some of the problems in the comparative study of languages within the phylum are the result of their early extinction and limited documentation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amerind languages</span> Hypothetical language macrofamily of the Americas

Amerind is a hypothetical higher-level language family proposed by Joseph Greenberg in 1960 and elaborated by his student Merritt Ruhlen. Greenberg proposed that all of the indigenous languages of the Americas belong to one of three language families, the previously established Eskimo–Aleut and Na–Dene, and with everything else—otherwise classified by specialists as belonging to dozens of independent families—as Amerind. Due to a large number of methodological flaws in the 1987 book Language in the Americas, the relationships he proposed between these languages have been rejected by the majority of historical linguists as spurious.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caddoan languages</span> Family of Native American languages

The Caddoan languages are a family of languages native to the Great Plains spoken by tribal groups of the central United States, from present-day North Dakota south to Oklahoma. All Caddoan languages are critically endangered, as the number of speakers has declined markedly due to colonial legacy, lack of support, and other factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macro-Siouan languages</span> Proposed language family of North America

The Macro-Siouan languages are a proposed language family that includes the Siouan, Iroquoian, and Caddoan families. Most linguists remain unconvinced that these languages share a genetic relationship, and the existence of a Macro-Siouan language family remains a subject of debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muskogean languages</span> Language family of Southeast US

Muskogean is a Native American language family spoken in different areas of the Southeastern United States. Though the debate concerning their interrelationships is ongoing, the Muskogean languages are generally divided into two branches, Eastern Muskogean and Western Muskogean. Typologically, Muskogean languages are agglutinative. One documented language, Apalachee, is extinct and the remaining languages are critically endangered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plateau Penutian languages</span> Subgroup within the hypothetical Penutian language family

Plateau Penutian is a family of languages spoken in northern California, reaching through central-western Oregon to northern Washington and central-northern Idaho.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atakapa language</span> Extinct language of southern United States

Atakapa is an extinct language isolate native to southwestern Louisiana and nearby coastal eastern Texas. It was spoken by the Atakapa people. The language became extinct in the early 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siouan languages</span> Language family of North America

Siouan or Siouan–Catawban is a language family of North America that is located primarily in the Great Plains, Ohio and Mississippi valleys and southeastern North America with a few other languages in the east.

The Avoyel or Avoyelles were a small Native American tribe who at the time of European contact inhabited land near the mouth of the Red River at its confluence with the Atchafalaya River near present-day Marksville, Louisiana. Also called variously Shi'xkaltī'ni in Tunican and Tassenocogoula, Tassenogoula, Toux Enongogoula, and Tasånåk Okla in the Mobilian trade language; all names are said by early French chroniclers to mean either "Flint People" or "People of the Rocks". This is thought to either reflect their active trading of flint for tools from local sources on their land in the eponymously named modern Avoyelles Parish or more likely as their status as middlemen in trading flint from Caddoan peoples to their north to the stone deficit Atakapa and Chitimacha peoples of the Gulf Coast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natchez language</span> Extinct indigenous language of Mississippi and Louisiana

The Natchez language is the ancestral language of the Natchez people who historically inhabited Mississippi and Louisiana, and who now mostly live among the Muscogee and Cherokee peoples in Oklahoma. The language is considered to be either unrelated to other indigenous languages of the Americas or distantly related to the Muskogean languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yuki–Wappo languages</span> Family of Native American languages

The Yuki–Wappo or Yukian languages are a small language family of western California consisting of two distantly related languages, both now extinct.

The Plains Algonquian languages are commonly grouped together as a subgroup of the larger Algonquian family, itself a member of the Algic family. Though the grouping is often encountered in the literature, it is an areal grouping rather than a genetic one. In other words, the languages are grouped together because they were spoken near one another, not because they are more closely related to one another than to any other Algonquian language. Most studies indicate that within the Algonquian family, only Eastern Algonquian constitutes a separate genetic subgroup.

Macro-Mayan is a proposal linking the clearly established Mayan family with neighboring families that show similarities to Mayan. The term was apparently coined by McQuown (1942), but suggestions for historical relationships relevant to this hypothesis can be traced back to the Squier (1861), who offered comparisons between Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages, and Radin, who did the same for Mixe-Zoquean, Huave, and Mayan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linguistic areas of the Americas</span>

The indigenous languages of the Americas form various linguistic areas or Sprachbunds that share various common (areal) traits.

The Takelma–Kalapuyan languages are a proposed small language family that comprises the Kalapuyan languages and Takelma, which were formerly spoken in the Willamette Valley and the Rogue Valley in Oregon.

References

  1. Haas, Mary. (1951). The Proto-Gulf word for water (with notes on Siouan-Yuchi). International Journal of American Linguistics 17: 71-9.
  2. Haas, Mary. (1952). The Proto-Gulf word for 'land' (with notes on Proto-Siouan). International Journal of American Linguistics 18: 238-240.
  3. Campbell, Lyle and Marianne Mithun. 1979. The Languages of Native America: A Historical and Comparative Assessment. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  4. Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Munro, Pamela. 1995. Gulf and Yuki-Gulf. Anthropological Linguistics 36: 125-222.
  6. 1 2 Haas, Mary R. (1958). A New Linguistic Relationship in North America: Algonkian and the Gulf Languages. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 14(3), 231-264.
  7. 1 2 Kimball, Geoffrey. 1994. Comparative difficulties of the "Gulf" languages. In Langdon, Margaret (ed.), Proceedings of the Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous languages of the Americas July 2–4, 1993 and the Hokan-Penutian Workshop July 3, 1993 (both held at the 1993 Linguistic Institute at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio). Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, Report 8. Berkeley: University of California.