Primitive communism

Last updated

Primitive communism is a theory to describe the gift economies of hunter-gatherers throughout history, where resources and property hunted or gathered are shared within the group. In political sociology and anthropology, it is also a concept (often credited to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels), that describes hunter-gatherer societies as traditionally being based on egalitarian social relations and common ownership. [1] A primary inspiration for both Marx and Engels were Lewis H. Morgan's descriptions of "communism in living" as practised by the Haudenosaunee of North America. [2] In Marx's model of socioeconomic structures, societies with primitive communism had no social class structures or capital accumulation. [3]

Contents

The idea has been criticised by anthropologists as too ethnocentrically European a model to be applied to other societies, whilst also romanticising non European societies. Anthropologists such as Margaret Mead argue that private property exists in hunter-gatherer and other "primitive societies" and provide examples that Marx and subsequent theorists label as personal property, not private property.

Development of the idea

The original idea of primitive communism is rooted in the idea of the noble savage present in the works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau [4] and the early anthropological work of Morgan and Ely S. Parker. [5] [6] [7] Engels was the first to write about primitive communism in detail, with the 1884 publication of The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State . [5] [8] Engels categorised primitive communist societies into two phases: the "wild" (hunter-gatherer) phase that lacked permanent superstructure and had close relationships with the natural world, and the "barbarian" phase which held a superstructure like that of the ancient Germanic populations beyond the borders of the Roman Empire [6] and the Indigenous peoples of North America before colonisation by Europeans, [9] being intra-communally egalitarian and matrilineal within the community. [6]

Marx and Engels used the term more broadly than Marxists did later, and applied it not only to hunter-gatherers but also to some communities that engaged in subsistence agriculture. [10] There is also no agreement among later scholars, including Marxists, on the historical extent, or longevity, of primitive communism. [11] Marx and Engels also noted how capitalist accumulation latched itself onto social organizations of primitive communism. [12] For instance, in private correspondence the same year that The Origin of the Family was published, Engels attacked European colonialism, describing the Dutch regime in Java directly organizing agricultural production and profiting from it, "on the basis of the old communistic village communities".[ clarification needed ] He added that cases like the Dutch East Indies, British India and the Russian Empire showed "how today primitive communism furnishes ... the finest and broadest basis of exploitation". [13]

Anarchists, including Peter Kropotkin and Élisée Reclus, believed that societies that exemplified primitive communism were also examples of anarchist society before industrialisation. [14] An example of this is Kropotkin's anthropological work on anarchism and gift economies, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, which uses a study of the San people of southern Africa for its thesis. [15]

There was little development in the research of "primitive communism" among Marxist scholars beyond Engels' study until the 20th and 21st centuries when Ernest Mandel, Rosa Luxemburg, [16] Ian Hodder, Marija Gimbutas and others took up and developed upon the original theses. [17] [18] [19] Some non-Marxist scholars of prehistory did not accept the term. [20] [21] The term primitive communism first appeared in Russian scholarship in the late 19th century, with references to primitive communism existing in ancient Crete. [22] However, it was not researched in any depth until the 20th century, with work such as that of the ethnographer Dmitry Konstantinovich Zelenin, who looked at non-hunter-gatherer societies within the Soviet Union to identify remnants of primitive communism within their societies. [23]

Venus figurine found in the Kostyonki-Borshchyovo archaeological complex, Russia Kostenki I Venus.jpg
Venus figurine found in the Kostyonki–Borshchyovo archaeological complex, Russia

The belief of primitive communism as based on Morgan's work is inaccurate [6] due to Morgan's misunderstandings of Haudenosaunee society and his since-disproven theory of social evolution. [24] Subsequent and more accurate research has focused on hunter-gatherer societies and aspects of such societies in relation to land ownership, communal ownership, and criminality and justice. [25] A newer definition of primitive communism could be summarized as societies that practice economic cooperation among the members of their community, [26] [27] where almost every member of a community has their own contribution to society, where their labour-input roughly corresponded with their return in resources, and land and natural resources are often shared among the community. [26] [27]

From the 20th century onward, sociologists and archaeologists have looked at the application of the term of primitive communism to hunter-gatherer societies of the paleolithic through to horticultural societies of the Chalcolithic, [28] [29] including Paleo-American societies from the lithic stage through the archaic period. [30] Soviet archaeologists, influenced by Morgan's and Engels' works, interpreted the various paleolithic cultures that created Venus figures, many of which were found in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s, as evidence of the societies being primitive communist and matriarchal in nature. [31] [32] [33] The psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich concluded in 1931 [34] [35] the existence of an early communism from the information in Bronisław Malinowski's work. [36] However, Malinowski and the philosopher Erich Fromm did not consider this conclusion to be compelling. [37] Ernest Borneman supported Reich's ideas in his 1975 work Das Patriarchat. [38] [39]

Primitive communist societies

Characteristics

Mbendjele hunter-gatherer meat sharing Mbendjele meat sharing.jpg
Mbendjele hunter-gatherer meat sharing

In a primitive communist society, the productive forces would have consisted of all able-bodied persons engaged in obtaining food and resources from the land, [40] and everyone would share in what was produced by hunting and gathering. [41] [42] There would be no private property, which is distinguished from personal property [43] such as articles of clothing and similar personal items, because primitive society produced no surplus; what was produced was quickly consumed and this was because there existed no division of labour, hence people were forced to work together. [44] The few things that existed for any length of time - the means of production (tools and land), housing - were held communally. [45] In Engels' view, in association with matrilocal residence and matrilineal descent, [46] reproductive labour was shared. [47] There would have also been a lack of state. [48]

A term usually associated with Karl Marx, but most fully elaborated by Friedrich Engels (in The Origin of the Family , 1884), [5] and referring to the collective right to basic resources, egalitarianism in social relationships, and absence of authoritarian rule and hierarchy that is supposed to have preceded stratification and exploitation in human history. Both Marx and Engels were heavily influenced by Lewis Henry Morgan's speculative evolutionary history, which described the "liberty, equality and fraternity of the ancient gentes", and the "communism in living" said to be evident in the village architecture of native Americans.

—John Scott and Gordon Marshall, 2007, Dictionary of Sociology.

Domestication of animals and plants following the Neolithic Revolution through herding and agriculture, and the subsequent urban revolution, were seen as the turning point from primitive communism to class society, as this transition was followed by the appearance of private ownership and slavery, [49] with the inequality that those entail. [35] In addition, parts of the population began to specialize in different activities, such as manufacturing, culture, philosophy, and science which lead in part to social stratification and the development of social classes. [50] [51]

Egalitarian and communist-like hunter-gatherer societies have been studied and described by many well-known social anthropologists including James Woodburn, [52] Richard Borshay Lee, [53] Alan Barnard [54] and Jerome Lewis. [55] [56] Anthropologists such as Christopher Boehm, [57] Chris Knight [58] and Lewis [59] offer theoretical accounts to explain how communistic, assertively egalitarian social arrangements might have emerged in the prehistoric past. Despite differences in emphasis, these and other anthropologists follow Engels in arguing that evolutionary change—resistance to primate-style sexual and political dominance—culminated eventually in a revolutionary transition. Lee criticizes the mainstream and dominant culture's long-time bias against the idea of primitive communism, deriding "Bourgeois ideology [that] would have us believe that primitive communism doesn't exist. In popular consciousness it is lumped with romanticism, exoticism: the noble savage." [60]

Papers have argued that the depiction of hunter-gatherers as egalitarian is misleading. According to one paper published in Current Anthropology , while levels of inequality were low, they were still present, with the average hunter-gatherer group having a Gini coefficient of 0.25 (for comparison, this was attained by the nation of Denmark in 2007). [61] This argument is in part supported by Alain Testart and others, who have said that a society without property is not free from problems of exploitation, [62] domination [63] or wars. [64] Marx and Engels, however, did not argue that communism brought about equality, as according to them equality was a concept without connection in physical reality. [65] Testart does support Engels' observations that societies without surplus are economically egalitarian and conversely that societies with surplus are unequal. [66] [67] [68]

Arnold Petersen has used the existence of primitive communism to argue against the idea that communism goes against human nature. [69] Hikmet Kıvılcımlı in his The Thesis of History argued that in pre-capitalist societies, the main dynamic of historical change "was not class struggle within society but rather the strong collective action" of egalitarian and collectivist values of "primitive socialist society". [70]

Example societies

Catalhoyuk after the first excavations Catalhoyuk after the first excavations by James Mellaart and his team..jpg
Çatalhöyük after the first excavations

Due to the strong evidence of an egalitarian society, lack of hierarchy, and lack of economic inequality, historian Murray Bookchin has argued that Çatalhöyük was an early example of anarcho-communism, and so an example of primitive communism in a proto-city. [71] However, still others use Çatalhöyük as an example that refutes the concept of primitive communism. [72] Similarly, it has been argued that the Indus Valley civilisation is an example of a primitive communist society due to its perceived lack of conflict and social hierarchies. [73] Daniel Miller and others argue that such an assessment of the Indus Valley civilisation is not correct. [74] [75]

The Marxist archaeologist V. Gordon Childe carried out excavations in Scotland from the 1920s and concluded that there was a neolithic classless society that reached as far as the Orkney Islands. [76] [77] This has been supported by Perry Anderson, who has argued that primitive communism was prevalent in pre-Roman western Europe. [78] Descriptions of such societies are also present in the works of classical authors. [79] [44]

Biblical scholars have also argued that the mode of production seen in early Hebrew society was a communitarian domestic one that was akin to primitive communism. [80] [81] Claude Meillassoux has commented on how the mode of production seen in many primitive societies is a communistic domestic one. [82]

The Indian communist politician Shripad Amrit Dange considered ancient Indian society to be of a primitive communist nature. [83] Other communists within India have also labelled the societies of current indigenous groups, such as the Adivasi, as examples of primitive communism. [84] In Alfred Radcliffe-Brown's study of the Andamanese at the beginning of the 20th century he comments that they have "customs which result in an approach to communism" and "their domestic policy may be described as a communism". [85]

Rundale clachan patterns of settlement still visible in Inver, Kilcommon, Erris, County Mayo, Ireland Inver Rundale Clachan settlement patterns.JPG
Rundale clachan patterns of settlement still visible in Inver, Kilcommon, Erris, County Mayo, Ireland

Alexander Mikhailovich Zolotarev  [ ru ], in his 1960 work on the development of religious cult communities from tribal communities in the Balkans, spoke of the primitive communism of the "archaic form of the tribal system". [86]

Rolf Jensen in the 1980s conducted a historical study of Wolof society in west Africa looking at the development of class antagonisms from a primitive communist society. [87] Also in the 1980s, Bourgeault looked at the forceful transition of indigenous societies in Canada from their traditional structures, which were anarchist and communistic in nature, into capitalist exploitation due to encroaching imperialism and colonialism. [88] [18] [89] Such an area of interest has been a common topic of research for many fields beyond just Marxist scholars. [90] Some anthropologists, such as John H. Moore, have continued to argue that societies such as those of Native Americans constitute primitive communist societies, whilst acknowledging and incorporating the research showing the complexity and diversity in native American societies. [91] [92]

James Connolly believed that "Gaelic primitive communism" existed in remnants in Irish society after it "had almost entirely disappeared" from much of western Europe. [93] The agrarian communes of the rundale system in Ireland have subsequently been assessed using a framework of primitive communism, where the system fits Marx and Engels' definition. [94]

Soviet theorists and anthropologists, such as Lev Sternberg, considered some of the indigenous groups of Siberia and the Russian far east (such as the Nivkh) to be primitive communist in nature. [95] [96]

Criticism

A detail from Benjamin West's heroic, neoclassical history painting, The Death of General Wolfe (1771), depicting an idealized indigenous American. An example of the romanticisation of indigenous and non-Western people. Benjamin west Death wolfe noble savage.jpg
A detail from Benjamin West's heroic, neoclassical history painting, The Death of General Wolfe (1771), depicting an idealized indigenous American. An example of the romanticisation of indigenous and non-Western people.

Criticism of the idea of primitive communism relates to definitions of property, where anthropologists such as Margaret Mead argue that private property exists in hunter-gatherer and other "primitive societies" but provide examples that Marx and subsequent theorists label as personal property, not private property. [98] [99] Similar arguments have been made by other academics, such as the economist Richard Pipes. [42] The idea has also been critiqued by other anthropologists for being based on Morgan's evolutionary model of society and for romanticising non‐Western societies. [100]

Western and non-Western scholars have criticised applying models that are too ethnocentrically European to non-European societies. [101] [44] Western scholars, including Leacock, have also criticised the ethnocentric point of view and biases in previous ethnographic research into hunter-gatherer societies. [82] This is similar to criticism of adhering to stadialism in analysing cultures. [102] Feminist scholars have criticised the idea of the lack of subjugation of women as suggested from the works of Engels, [82] [5] while Marxist feminists have been critical of and have reassessed Engels' ideas in The Origin of the Family related to the development of women's subjugation in the transition from primitive communism to class society. [103]

The Marxian economist Ernest Mandel criticised the research of Soviet scholars on primitive communism due to the influence of "Soviet-Marxist ideology" in their social sciences work. [44] [104]

David Graeber and David Wengrow's The Dawn of Everything makes claims against the notion that humans lived in precarious, small-scale societies with little surplus. While they provide examples of sharing egalitarian societies in pre-history, they claim that a huge variety of complex societies (some with large cities) existed long before the supposed agricultural and then urban revolutions proposed by V. Gordon Childe. [72] Graeber and Wengrow's understanding of hunter-gatherer societies has, however, been questioned by many anthropologists such as Chris Knight, Camilla Power, James Suzman, Arjun Appadurai. [105] [106] [107] [108]

Anthropologist Manvir Singh argued that while some indigenous groups, such as the Aché of Paraguay, exemplified primitive communism, this did not apply to all indigenous groups, such as the Hiwi, using the example of the unequal distribution of meat from hunting, “hunter’s privilege.” Singh supposes that many hunter gatherers, including the Andaman Islanders and Northern Paiute, recognized private ownership over land and trees, and claims that all hunter gatherers had private property, but as with Margaret Mead, provides examples that Marx and subsequent theorists call personal property, not private property, such as personal "bows, arrows, axes and cooking implements". [109] Likewise, it may be argued that “hunter’s privilege,” as control of personal goods on the basis of the labor done to secure the meat (a basic supposition in Marx’s theory of species-being), does not exemplify differential control over the societal means of production, and therefore does not form a justified counterexample to primitive communism; the difference is captured by the Marxian phrase: “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.”

The use of the term "communism" to describe these societies has been questioned when put in comparison with a future post-industrial communism, particularly in relation to the difference in scale from small communal groups to the size of modern nation-states. [110] [111]

Use of the term "primitive"

The term “Primitive" in recent anthropological and social studies has begun to fall out of use due to racial stereotypes surrounding the ideas of what is primitive. [112] Such a move has been supported by indigenous peoples who have faced racial stereotyping and violence due to being viewed as "primitive". [113] [114] Due to this, the term "primitive communism" may be replaced by terms such as Pre-Marxist communism. [115]

Alain Testart and others have said that anthropologists should be careful when using research on current hunter-gatherer societies to determine the structure of societies in the paleolithic, where viewing current hunter-gatherer communities as "the most ancient of so-called primitive societies" is likely due to appearances and perceptions and does not reflect the progress and development that such societies have undergone in the past 10,000 years. [116]

There have been Marxist historians criticised for their comments on the "primitivism" and "barbarism" of societies prior to their contact with European empires, such as the comments of Endre Sík. Such views on "primitivism" and "barbarism" are also prevalent in the works of their non-Marxist contemporaries. [117] [118] [119] Marxist anthropologists have criticised and denounced Soviet anthropologists and historians for declaring indigenous communities they were studying for primitive communism as "degenerate". [44]

See also

Anthropology

Economy

Law

Marxism

Related Research Articles

<i>The Communist Manifesto</i> 1848 political publication by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

The Communist Manifesto, originally the Manifesto of the Communist Party, is a political pamphlet written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, commissioned by the Communist League and originally published in London in 1848. The text is the first and most systematic attempt by Marx and Engels to codify for wide consumption the historical materialist idea that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles", in which social classes are defined by the relationship of people to the means of production. Published amid the Revolutions of 1848 in Europe, the manifesto remains one of the world's most influential political documents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunter-gatherer</span> Peoples who forage or hunt for most or all of their food and life

A hunter-gatherer or forager is a human living in a community, or according to an ancestrally derived lifestyle, in which most or all food is obtained by foraging, that is, by gathering food from local naturally occurring sources, especially wild edible plants but also insects, fungi, honey, bird eggs, or anything safe to eat, and/or by hunting game. This is a common practice among most vertebrates that are omnivores. Hunter-gatherer societies stand in contrast to the more sedentary agricultural societies, which rely mainly on cultivating crops and raising domesticated animals for food production, although the boundaries between the two ways of living are not completely distinct.

Christian communism is a theological view that the teachings of Jesus compel Christians to support religious communism. Although there is no universal agreement on the exact dates when communistic ideas and practices in Christianity began, many Christian communists argue that evidence from the Bible suggests that the first Christians, including the Apostles in the New Testament, established their own small communist society in the years following Jesus' death and resurrection. Many advocates of Christian communism and other communists, including Karl Kautsky, argue that it was taught by Jesus and practised by the apostles themselves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social stratification</span> Concept in sociology

Social stratification refers to a society's categorization of its people into groups based on socioeconomic factors like wealth, income, race, education, ethnicity, gender, occupation, social status, or derived power. It is a hierarchy within groups that ascribe them to different levels of privileges. As such, stratification is the relative social position of persons within a social group, category, geographic region, or social unit.

The history of communism encompasses a wide variety of ideologies and political movements sharing the core principles of common ownership of wealth, economic enterprise, and property. Most modern forms of communism are grounded at least nominally in Marxism, a theory and method conceived by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels during the 19th century. Marxism subsequently gained a widespread following across much of Europe, and throughout the late 1800s its militant supporters were instrumental in a number of unsuccessful revolutions on that continent. During the same era, there was also a proliferation of communist parties which rejected armed revolution, but embraced the Marxist ideal of collective property and a classless society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marxism</span> Economic and sociopolitical worldview

Marxism is a political philosophy and method of socioeconomic analysis. It uses a dialectical and materialist interpretation of historical development, better known as historical materialism, to analyse class relations, social conflict, and social transformation. Marxism originates with the works of 19th-century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism has developed over time into various branches and schools of thought, and as a result, there is no single, definitive "Marxist theory". Marxism has had a profound effect in shaping the modern world, with various left-wing and far-left political movements taking inspiration from it in varying local contexts.

Common ownership refers to holding the assets of an organization, enterprise or community indivisibly rather than in the names of the individual members or groups of members as common property.

The theory of the Asiatic mode of production (AMP) was devised by Karl Marx around the early 1850s. The essence of the theory has been described as "[the] suggestion ... that Asiatic societies were held in thrall by a despotic ruling clique, residing in central cities and directly expropriating surplus from largely autarkic and generally undifferentiated village communities".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Influences on Karl Marx</span>

Influences on Karl Marx are generally thought to have been derived from three main sources, namely German idealist philosophy, French socialism and English and Scottish political economy.

Communism is a sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement, whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered around common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products to everyone in the society based on need. A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state.

Eleanor Burke Leacock was an American anthropologist and social theorist who made major contributions to the study of egalitarian societies, the evolution of the status of women in society, Marxism, and the feminist movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urgesellschaft</span>

Urgesellschaft is a term that, according to Friedrich Engels, refers to the original coexistence of humans in prehistoric times, before recorded history. Here, a distinction is made between the kind of Homo sapiens as humans, who hardly differed from modern humans biologically, and other representatives of the genus Homo such as the Homo erectus or the Neanderthal. Engels claimed "that animal family dynamics and human primitive society are incompatible things" because "the primitive humans that developed out of animalism either knew no family at all or at most one that does not occur among animals". The U.S. anthropologist Lewis Henry Morgan and translations of his books also make use of the term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pre-Marxist communism</span> Overview of communist-oriented ideologies and practices prior to the works of Karl Marx

While Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels defined communism as a political movement, there were already similar ideas in the past which one could call communist experiments. Marx himself saw primitive communism as the original hunter-gatherer state of humankind. Marx theorized that only after humanity was capable of producing surplus did private property develop.

Marxist archaeology is an archaeological theory that interprets archaeological information using the framework of dialectical materialism, which is often short-handed as Marxism.

Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis that originates in the works of 19th century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism analyzes and critiques the development of class society and especially of capitalism as well as the role of class struggles in systemic, economic, social and political change. It frames capitalism through a paradigm of exploitation and analyzes class relations and social conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development – materialist in the sense that the politics and ideas of an epoch are determined by the way in which material production is carried on.

Classical Marxism is the body of economic, philosophical, and sociological theories expounded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in their works, as contrasted with orthodox Marxism, Marxism–Leninism, and autonomist Marxism which emerged after their deaths. The core concepts of classical Marxism include alienation, base and superstructure, class consciousness, class struggle, exploitation, historical materialism, ideology, revolution; and the forces, means, modes, and relations of production. Marx's political praxis, including his attempt to organize a professional revolutionary body in the First International, often served as an area of debate for subsequent theorists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utopian socialism</span> Political theory concerned with imagined socialist societies

Utopian socialism is the term often used to describe the first current of modern socialism and socialist thought as exemplified by the work of Henri de Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier, Étienne Cabet, and Robert Owen. Utopian socialism is often described as the presentation of visions and outlines for imaginary or futuristic ideal societies, with positive ideals being the main reason for moving society in such a direction. Later socialists and critics of utopian socialism viewed utopian socialism as not being grounded in actual material conditions of existing society. These visions of ideal societies competed with revolutionary and social democratic movements.

Historical materialism is Karl Marx's theory of history. Marx located historical change in the rise of class societies and the way humans labor together to make their livelihoods.

Christopher Boehm (1931–2021) was an American cultural anthropologist with a subspecialty in primatology, who researched conflict resolution, altruism, the evolution of morality, and feuding and warfare. He was also the Director of the Jane Goodall Research Center at University of Southern California, a multi-media interactive database focusing on the social and moral behavior of world hunter gatherers. Boehm died on November 23, 2021, at the age of 90.

References

  1. Scott & Marshall (2007); Felluga (2011); Bealey (1999); Rozental & Judin (1955) , pp. 697–698
  2. Morgan, Lewis Henry (1881). Houses and House-Life of the American Aborigines. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Lee, Richard; DeVore, Irven (1969). Man the Hunter . Aldine Transaction. ISBN   978-0-202-33032-7.
  4. Woodcock, George (1983). "Anarchism: A Historical Introduction". In Woodcock, George (ed.). The Anarchist Reader (4 ed.). Fontana Paperbacks.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Engels, Friedrich (1972) [1884]. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan. International Publishers. ISBN   978-0-7178-0359-0.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Darmangeat, Christophe (2009). Le Communisme primitif n'est plus ce qu'il était[Primitive Communism is not what it used to be] (in French). Collectif d'édition Smolny.
  7. Brown, Garrett W.; McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (2018). A Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics and International Relations (4 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199670840.
  8. Wilson, James (2000). The Earth Shall Weep: A history of native America. New York: Grove Press.
  9. Gatto Trocchi, Cecilia [in Italian]. Storia Dell'Antropologia Culturale[History of Cultural Anthropology] (in Italian).
  10. Patterson, Thomas C. (2021). "Engels's Legacy to Anthropology". In Saito, Kohei (ed.). Reexamining Engels's Legacy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 237–256. ISBN   978-3-030-55210-7.
  11. Casal (2020); Knight & June 2021; Seagle (1937); Kostick (2021)
  12. Pal Singh, Nikhil (September 2016). "On Race, Violence, and So-Called Primitive Accumulation" (PDF). Social Text . 34 (3): 27–50. doi:10.1215/01642472-3607564. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021.
  13. Bottomore, T. B. (1991). A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 174.
  14. Clark, John P.; Martin, Camille (2005). "Elisee Reclus: Anarchy (1894)". In Graham, Robert (ed.). Anarchism: A documentary history of libertarian ideas. Vol. 1. Black Rose Books.
  15. Barnard, Alan (17 December 1992). "Primitive communism and mutual aid, Kropotkin visits the Bushmen". In Hann, C.M. (ed.). Socialism: Ideals, Ideologies, and Local Practice. Routledge. ISBN   9780415083225.
  16. Löwy, Michael (1 January 2012). "Zachodni imperializm przeciwko pierwotnemu komunizmowi – nowe odczytanie pism ekonomicznych Róży Luksemburg" [Western imperialism against primitive communism – a new reading of Rosa Luxemburg's economic writings]. Dziedzictwo Róży Luksemburg (in Polish). 6: 299–310. doi: 10.14746/prt.2012.6.16 .
  17. Reinisch, Dieter, ed. (2012). Der Urkommunismus. Auf den Spuren der egalitären Gesellschaft[Primitive communism. On the trail of the egalitarian society] (in German). Vienna: Promedia. ISBN   978-3-85371-350-1.
  18. 1 2 Parreira Álvares, Lucas (2017). "Comunismo Primitivo e transição capitalista no pensamento de Rosa Luxemburgo" [Primitive Communism and Capitalist Transition in Rosa Luxemburg's Thought]. Revista Direito e Práxis (in Portuguese). 8 (1). Archived from the original on 21 April 2021.
  19. Morton, Stephen (2018). "Capital Accumulation and Debt Colonialism after Rosa Luxemburg". New Formations. 94 (94). Lawrence & Wishart Ltd.: 82–99. doi:10.3898/NEWF:94.06.2018. S2CID   158517913.
  20. McGregor 2021.
  21. Harman, Chris (1994). "Engels and the Origins of Human Society". International Socialism . 2 (65). Archived from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021 via Marxists Internet Archive.
  22. Vodovozov, Vasily Vasilievich [in Russian] (1890–1907). Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' Brokgauza i Yefrona: v 86 t. (82 t. i 4 dop.)Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона: в 86 т. (82 т. и 4 доп.)[ Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary: in 86 volumes (82 volumes and 4 additional)] (in Russian). Saint Petersburg.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  23. Zelenin, Dmitry Konstantinovich (1934). "Imushchestvennyye zaprety kak perezhitki pervobytnogo kommunizma" Имущественные запреты как пережитки первобытного коммунизма[Property Restrictions as Survivals of Primitive Communism]. Transactions of the Institute of Anthropology and Ethnography (in Russian). 1 (1). Leningrad.
  24. Morgan (1964); Service et al. (1981); Hersey (1993); Smith (2009); Haller (1971); Hume (2011); Yang (2012)
  25. Yang 2012.
  26. 1 2 Ratner, Carl (2012). Cooperation, Community, and Co-Ops in a Global Era. Springer Science+Business Media. p. 40. ISBN   9781461458258 via Google Books.
  27. 1 2 Lee 1990.
  28. Saitta, Dean J. (1988). "Marxism, Prehistory, and Primitive Communism". Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society . 1 (4): 145–168. doi:10.1080/08935698808657836. Archived from the original on 27 March 2022. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  29. "Primitive communism: life before class and oppression". Socialist Worker . 28 May 2013. Archived from the original on 14 March 2021. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
  30. Trigger, Bruce G.; Washburn, Wilcomb E., eds. (1996). The Cambridge history of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Vol. 1: North America, Part 1. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Reshetov, A. M. (1972). Okhotniki, sobirateli, rybolovy. Problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy v dozemledel'cheskom obshchestveОхотники, собиратели, рыболовы. Проблемы социально-экономических отношений в доземледельческом обществе[Hunters, Gatherers, Fishermen: Problems of Socioeconomic Relations in Pre-Agrarian Society] (in Russian).
  32. Vaitovich, Alexandra Vladimirovna; Kurlovich, Polina Sergeevna (2020). ""Pervobytno-kommunisticheskoye obshchestvo i yego raspad": doistoricheskoye proshloye territorii Belarusi soglasno kontseptsii V. K. Shcherbakova" "Первобытно-коммунистическое общество и его распад": доисторическое прошлое территории Беларуси согласно концепции В. К. Щербакова ["Primitive communist society and its disintegration": the prehistoric past of the territory of Belarus according to the concept of V. K. Shcherbakov]. Journal of the Belarusian State University. History (in Russian). 4 (3). doi: 10.33581/2520-6338-2020-3-54-63 .
  33. Fehlmann, Meret (2011). Die Rede vom Matriarchat: Zur Gebrauchsgeschichte eines Arguments [Talk of matriarchy. To the history of use of an argument] (Thesis) (in German). Zurich: Chronos. ISBN   978-3-0340-1067-2. Archived from the original on 6 December 2018.
  34. Reich, Wilhelm (1936). Der Einbruch der Sexualmoral. Zur Geschichte der sexuellen Ökonomie [ The Invasion of Compulsory Sex Morality. On the history of the sexual economy] (in German) (2nd ed.). Berlin: International Psychoanalytic University.
  35. 1 2 Reich, Wilhelm (1972). Baxandall, Lee (ed.). SEX-POL: Essays 1929-1934 (PDF). Translated by Bostock, Anna. New York: Vintage Books New York. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 April 2021.
  36. Malinowski, Bronisław (1929). Życie seksualne dzikich w północno-zachodniej Melanezji[ The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia ] (in Polish).
  37. Fromm, Erich (1999). "Rezension zu Wilhelm Reich "Der Einbruch der Sexualmoral"" [Review of Wilhelm Reich's "The Invasion of Compulsory Sex Morality"]. Erich Fromm: Gesamtausgabe in zwölf Bänden[Erich Fromm: Complete edition in twelve volumes] (in German). Vol. 8. Munich. pp. 93–96. ISBN   3421052808.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  38. Borneman, Ernest (1975). Das Patriarchat[The Patriarchy] (in German).
  39. Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn (1979). "Marxist Reappraisal of the Matriarchate". Current Anthropology . 20 (2): 341–359. doi:10.1086/202272. S2CID   146605850.
  40. Matveevich, Rumyantsev Alexey [in Russian] (1987). Pervobytnyy sposob proizvodstva: Politiko-ekonomicheskiye ocherkiПервобытный способ производства: Политико-экономические очерки[The Primitive Mode of Production: Political and Economic Essays] (in Russian). Moscow.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  41. Borisov, Evgeniĭ Filippovich; Zhamin, Vitaliĭ Alekseevich; Makarova, M.F. (1975). Diccionario de Economía Política[Dictionary of Political Economy] (in Spanish). Madrid: Akal. ISBN   9788473390606.
  42. 1 2 Miropolsky, Dmitry Yurievich [in Russian] (2012). "Философия экономических Ценностей" [Philosophy of Economic Values]. Проблемы современной экономики (in Russian). 41 (1). Archived from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2022.
  43. "Eight myths about socialism—and their answers". Party for Socialism and Liberation. Archived from the original on 25 October 2013. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
  44. 1 2 3 4 5 Diamond 1979.
  45. Ward Gailey (2016); Stearns et al. (2004); Svizzero & Tisdell (2016); Tomba (2012); Semenov (1989) , p. 318
  46. Knight, Chris (2008). "Early Human Kinship Was Matrilineal". In Allen, Nicholas J.; Callan, Hilary; Dunbar, Robin; James, Wendy (eds.). Early Human Kinship (PDF). Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 61–82. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 October 2021.
  47. Faludi, Julianna; Crosby, Michelle (2021). "The Digital Economy of the Sourdough: Housewifisation in the Time of COVID-19". tripleC . 19 (1). tripleC. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021.
  48. Sims, Lionel (9 February 2012). "Primitive communism, barbarism and the origins of class society". Weekly Worker . Archived from the original on 7 October 2021.
  49. Cadigan-Deutsch, Noah; Ford, Peter; O'loughlin, Daniel (2020). "The Revolutionary Theory of Karl Marx". In Young, Gregory D.; Leszczcynski, Mateusz (eds.). Revolution: Theorists, Theories & Practice (PDF). University of Colorado, Boulder. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 April 2021.
  50. Stearns et al. 2004.
  51. Ember, Carol R. (1 June 2020). "Hunter-Gatherers (Foragers)". Human Relations Area Files . Archived from the original on 11 October 2021.
  52. Woodburn, James (September 1982). "Egalitarian Societies" (PDF). Man . 17 (3): 431–451. doi:10.2307/2801707. JSTOR   2801707.
  53. Lee 1992, pp. 73–94.
  54. Barnard, Alan (2008). "Social origins: sharing, exchange, kinship". In Botha, Rudolf; Knight, Chris (eds.). The Cradle of Language (Studies in the Evolution of Language 12). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 219–35.
  55. Lewis, Jerome (2008). "Ekila: "Blood, Bodies and Egalitarian Societies"" (PDF). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute . 14 (2): 297–315. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00502.x. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 June 2021.
  56. Lewis, Jerome (2002). Forest Hunter-Gatherers and Their World: A Study of Mbendjele Yaka Pygmies of Congo-Brazzaville and Their Secular and Religious Activities and Representations (PDF) (PhD). London School of Economics and Political Science. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  57. Boehm, Christopher (2001). Hierarchy in the Forest. The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  58. Knight, Chris (2002). "Language and revolutionary consciousness". In Wray, Alison (ed.). The Transition to Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 138–160.
  59. Knight, Chris; Lewis, Jerome (2014). "Vocal deception, laughter, and the linguistic significance of reverse dominance". In Dor, Daniel; Knight, Chris; Lewis, Jerome (eds.). The Social Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  60. Lee (1992) , pp. 73–94; Bloodworth (2018); Gowdy (1998); Power (2018a)
  61. Smith, Eric Alden; Hill, Kim; Marlowe, Frank W.; Nolin, David; Wiessner, Polly; Gurven, Michael; Bowles, Samuel; Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique; Hertz, Tom; Bell, Adrian (2010). "Wealth transmission and inequality among hunter-gatherers". Current Anthropology . 51 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1086/648530. PMC   2999363 . PMID   21151711.
  62. Darmangeat, Christophe (2015). "Were Some more Equal than Others? II- Forms of Exploitation under Primitive Communism". Actuel Marx . 58 (2): 144–158. doi:10.3917/amx.058.0144.
  63. Testart, Alain (2007). Critique du don: Etudes sur la circulation non marchande[Critique of the Gift: Studies on the non-mercantile circulation] (in French). Paris: Syllepse.
  64. Keeley, Lawrence H. (1996). War Before Civilization: the Myth of the Peaceful Savage. Oxford University Press.
  65. "Letters: Marx-Engels Correspondence 1875". Archived from the original on 11 September 2020. Retrieved 19 September 2020 via Marxists Internet Archive.
  66. Testart, Alain (2012). Avant l'histoire: l'évolution des sociétés, de Lascaux à Carnac[Before history: the evolution of societies, from Lascaux to Carnac ] (in French). Gallimard. ISBN   9782070131846.
  67. Testart, Alain (1995). Le communisme primitif: Tome I, Économie et Idéologie[Primitive communism: Volume 1, Economy and Ideology] (in French). Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. ISBN   978-2735101405.
  68. Dunayevskaya 2018.
  69. Petersen, Arnold (November 2004). Socialism and Human Nature (PDF). Socialist Labor Party of America. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 July 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2021.
  70. Cörüt, İlker; Jongerden, Joost (31 May 2021). "Radical Approaches to Nation: An Introduction". In Cörüt, İlker; Jongerden, Joost (eds.). Beyond Nationalism and the Nation-State: Radical Approaches to Nation. Routledge. ISBN   9780367684020.
  71. Bookchin, Murray (1987). The Rise of Urbanisation and Decline of Citizenship. pp. 18–22.
  72. 1 2 Kostick 2021.
  73. Khan, Lal (18 February 2014). "The Essence of the Legacy of Mohenjo-daro". In Defence of Marxism . International Marxist Tendency. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
  74. Miller, Daniel (1985). "Ideology and the Harappan Civilization" (PDF). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology . 4 (4): 34–71. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(85)90013-3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 October 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
  75. Cork, Edward (2005). "Peaceful Harappans? Reviewing the evidence for the absence of warfare in the Indus Civilisation of north-west India and Pakistan (c. 2500-1900 BC)". Antiquity . 79 (304): 411–423. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0011419X. S2CID   160617108.
  76. Gordon Childe, Vere (1940). Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles. London/Edinburgh: W. and R. Chambers.
  77. Gordon Childe, Vere (1935). The Prehistory of Scotland. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.
  78. Anderson, Perry (1996). Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. Verso Books.
  79. Vencl, Slavomil [in Czech] (1988). "The problem of disappearance of hunter-gatherer societies in prehistory. Archaeological evidence and testimonies of classical authors". Listy filologické / Folia philologica. 111 (3). Centre for Classical Studies at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences: 129–143. JSTOR   23465415.
  80. Boer, Roland (2005). "Women First? On the Legacy of 'Primitive Communism'". Journal for the Study of the Old Testament . 30 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1177/0309089205057775. S2CID   144103562.
  81. Boer, Roland (2009). Political Myth: On the Use and Abuse of Biblical Themes. Duke University Press.
  82. 1 2 3 Mojab, Shahrzad, ed. (12 March 2015). Marxism and Feminism. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN   9781783603220.
  83. Dange, Shripad Amrit (1949). India from Primitive Communism to Slavery: A Marxist Study of Ancient History in Outline.
  84. Shah, Alpa (February 2021). "For an anthropological theory of praxis: dystopic utopia in Indian Maoism and the rise of the Hindu Right" (PDF). Social Anthropology . 29 (1). Wiley: 68–86. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12978. S2CID   229583364.
  85. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred (1922). The Andaman Islanders: a study in social anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
  86. Shephard, Henry M. (2020). "On some geographical distribution of the Old Indo-European layer derivative roots". On Some Geographical Distribution of the Derivatives Roots of Old Indo-European Layer. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021.
  87. Jensen, Rolf (March 1982). "The Transition from Primitive Communism: The Wolof Social Formation of West Africa". The Journal of Economic History . 42 (1). Cambridge University Press: 69–76. doi:10.1017/S0022050700026899. JSTOR   2120497. S2CID   154554198. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  88. Bourgeault, Ron G. (1983). "The Indian, the Métis and the Fur Trade Class, Sexism and Racism in the Transition from "Communism" to Capitalism". Studies in Political Economy: A Socialist Review. 12 (1): 45–80. doi:10.1080/19187033.1983.11675649.
  89. Anthony, Thalia (23 March 2021). "Marx and Anti-Colonialism". In Gordon, Faith; Newman, Daniel (eds.). Leading Works in Law and Social Justice. Routledge.
  90. Pejnović, Vesna Stanković, ed. (2021). Beyond Capitalism and Neoliberalism. Belgrade: Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade. ISBN   978-86-7419-337-2. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021.
  91. Moore, John H. (2007). "Free Goods and Primitive Communism: An Anthropological Perspective" (PDF). Nature, Society, and Thought . 20 (3–4): 418–424. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2021.
  92. Dunayevskaya 1982.
  93. Dobbins, Gregory (2008). "Connolly, the archive, and method". Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies. 10 (1): 48–66. doi:10.1080/13698010801933853. S2CID   143827225.
  94. Slater, Eamonn; Flaherty, Eoin (2009). "Marx on Primitive Communism: The Irish Rundale Agrarian Commune, its internal Dynamics and the Metabolic Rift" (PDF). Irish Journal of Anthropology . 12 (2). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 June 2020.
  95. Slezkine, Yuri (30 April 1997). "Primitive Communism and the Other Way Around". In Lahusen, Thomas; Dobrenko, Evgeny (eds.). Socialist Realism without Shores. Duke University Press. ISBN   9780822398097.
  96. Grant, Bruce (8 February 2018). "The burdens of primitive communism". Anuário Antropológico. 25 (1): 157–174. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021.
  97. Fryd, Vivien Green (1995). "Rereading the Indian in Benjamin West's "Death of General Wolfe"". American Art. 9 (1): 75. doi:10.1086/424234. JSTOR   3109196. S2CID   162205173.
  98. Mead, Margaret (1 January 1961). "Some Anthropological Considerations Concerning Natural Law" (PDF). Natural Law Forum: 51–64. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021.
  99. Lowie, Robert H. (March 1928). "Incorporeal Property in Primitive Society". Yale Law Journal . 37 (5): 551–563. doi:10.2307/790747. JSTOR   790747. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  100. Martin, Keir (5 September 2018). "Communism". In Callan, Hilary; Coleman, Simon (eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology (PDF). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781118924396. ISBN   9780470657225. S2CID   186634758. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021.
  101. Kaviraj, Sudipta (2005). "An Outline of a Revisionist Theory of Modernity". European Journal of Sociology . 46 (3). Cambridge University Press: 497–526. doi:10.1017/S0003975605000196. JSTOR   23998994. S2CID   143843577. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  102. Bianchi, Bernardo; Filion-Donato, Emilie; Miguel, Marlon; Yuva, Ayşe (2021). "From 'Materialism' towards 'Materialities'". In Bianchi, Bernardo; Filion-Donato, Emilie; Miguel, Marlon; Yuva, Ayşe (eds.). Materialism and Politics (PDF). Berlin: ICI Berlin Press. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2021.
  103. Vogel (2014); Dunayevskaya (1982); Dunayevskaya (2018); McGregor (2021)
  104. Mandel, Ernest (October 1969). The Marxist Theory of the State. Pathfinder Press. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  105. Knight, Chris (December 2021). "Wrong About (Almost) Everything". Focaal. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 25 December 2021.
  106. Power, Camilla (August 2018). "Gender egalitarianism made us human: patriarchy was too little, too late". Open Democracy . Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
  107. Suzman, James (November 2021). "On the Origin of Our Species". Literary Review . Archived from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  108. Appadurai, Arjun (2022). "The dawn of everything?". Anthropology Today. 38 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.12694. ISSN   1467-8322.
  109. Singh, Manvir (19 April 2022). "The idea of primitive communism is as seductive as it is wrong". Aeon . Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  110. "Primitive communism versus integral communism - Antagonism". libcom.org . 6 July 2009. Archived from the original on 28 November 2020.
  111. Casal 2020.
  112. Lee (1990); Corry (2009); Croom (2015); Ward Gailey (2016); Diamond (1979); Brown (2009)
  113. Yunkaporta, Tyson (2020). Sand Talk: How Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World. Melbourne: Text Publishing.
  114. Dozier, Edward P. (1955). "The Concepts of "Primitive" and "Native" in Anthropology". Yearbook of Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research: 187–202. doi:10.1086/yearanth.0.3031146. JSTOR   3031146. S2CID   89259624. Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
  115. Hodges, Donald C. (1992). Sandino's Communism: Spiritual Politics for the Twenty-First Century. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. ISBN   978-0-292-71647-6.
  116. Testart, Alain; Arcand, Bernard; Ingold, Tim; Legros, Dominique; Linkenbach, Antje; Morton, John; Peterson, Nicolas; Raju, D. R.; Schrire, Carmel; Smith, Eric Alden; Walter, M. Susan; Zvelebil, Marek (February 1988). "Some Major Problems in the Social Anthropology of Hunter-Gatherers [and Comments and Reply]". Current Anthropology. 29 (1). The University of Chicago Press: 1–31. doi:10.1086/203612. JSTOR   2743319. S2CID   42136717. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  117. Wesseling, Henk (2011). "Eurocentrism". A Cape of Asia: Essays on European History. Leiden University Press.
  118. Bloodworth 2018.
  119. Rouse, Carolyn M. (September 2019). "Claude Lévi-Strauss's Contribution to the Race Question: Race and History". American Anthropologist . 121 (3): 721–724. doi:10.1111/aman.13298. S2CID   198838685.

Bibliography

Further reading

Historic and original texts

Other texts