Southeastern Pomo language

Last updated

Southeastern Pomo
Native to United States
Region Northern California
Native speakers
7 (2013) [1]
Pomoan
  • Southeastern Pomo
Language codes
ISO 639-3 pom
Glottolog sout2982
ELP Southeastern Pomo
Pomoan languages map.svg
The seven Pomoan languages with an indication of their pre-contact distribution within California
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Southeastern Pomo, also known by the dialect names Elem Pomo, Koi Nation Lower Lake Pomo and Sulfur Bank Pomo, is one of seven distinct languages comprising the Pomoan language family of Northern California. In the language's prime, Southeastern Pomo was spoken primarily in an area surrounding East Lake and Lower Lake, in Lake County, along the eastern coast of Clear Lake, in Northern California by the Pomo people. [2] [3] Southeastern Pomos inhabited an area on the northern bank of Cache Creek, and the Sulfur Bank Rancheria. Dialectal differences between the two sites of habitation seem to be minimal, and may be limited to a small number of lexical differences. [4]

Contents

Phonology

Vowels

Southeastern Pomo has six vowels, as depicted in the following table. Vowels that are inserted via epenthesis sometimes depend upon the adjacent consonants. Because of the variability of inserted vowels, they have been hypothesized to be excrescent. Southeastern Pomo is the only language in the Pomoan language family with only a marginal vowel length distinction.

   Front    Central    Back  
  High (close) iu
  Mid  e(ə)o
  Low (open) a

Consonants

The consonants in Southeastern Pomo are as laid out in the following table. Following Moshinsky (1974), at a systematic phonemic and abstract phonemic level, the parenthesized segments could be removed from the inventory. [4] The voiced stop /d/ can in some cases be retroflex, as in the production of the word [x̣óḍoḍ] 'gopher snake'. The ejective stops of /k/ and /q/ are often distinguished by articulatory position.

Labial Dental Alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Glottal
Stop voiceless p t [ ][ ]c [ t͡ʃ ] k q ʔ
ejective [ t̪ʼ ]ṭʼ [ t̺ʼ ](cʼ) [ t͡ʃʼ ]
voiced b d [ ]
Fricative voiceless f s š [ ʃ ] x [ χ ] h
Nasal voiceless m n ( ŋ )
Tap voiced ( ɾ )
Approximant voiceless w l y [ j ]

Stress

Words are stressed on the first syllable. Although, in some cases a short epenthetic vowel is inserted to break up word-initial consonant clusters. Examples of these cases are:

In cases of loanwords, which are often borrowed from Spanish (similar to the examples above), the stress is changed from later stresses that are found in the Spanish language to an initial stress. Some examples of words that are borrowed from Spanish are as follows:

Primary stress is applied to the first stem vowel within the categories of noun and verb, this vowel is also often the first phonemic vowel in the word. Although there are two distinct exceptions to this rule: when a directional prefix comes before the vowel and in reduplication, when the vowel is the second occurrence in the stem.

Stress placement

Examples of this, as noted by Moshinsky (1974) are:

/ca+qla+m+t/ 'it flew down to the ground'

→ cáqlamat

/cicala/ 'pea'

→ cícala

/qlacac/ 'woodpecker'

→ qəlácac

Phonological processes

Sonorant syllabicization

In this phonological rule, /m/ and /l/ become syllabic when they precede a consonant which has the same point or articulation. Examples of this are as follows:

/lde/ 'mountain lion'/lṭa/ 'shoulder blade'/mpu+k+t/ 'he whistles'/mbo+l+k+t/ 'it exploded'
→ ldé

→ ḷdé

→ lṭá

→ ḷṭá

→ mpú+k+t

→ ṃpú+k+t

→ ṃpú+ki+t

→ ṃpúkit

→ mbó+l+k+t

→ ṃbó+l+k+t

→ ṃbó+l+ki+t

→ ṃbólkit

D-deletion

This rule is as follows: d → ø / _ C

D-deletion occurs when it appears before a consonant, and Moshinsky (1974) has hypothesized that this may occur in order to eliminate two-consonant clusters when the first consonant is an alveolar stop or resonant. Some examples of d-deletion in Southeastern Pomo are:

/lod+t/ 'my hair is falling out'/bṭed+lay/ 'women'
→ lód+t

→ ló+t

→ lót

→ bṭéd+lay

→ bəṭéd+lay

→ biṭéd+lay

→ biṭé+lay

→ biṭélay

Pretonic vowel epenthesis

This rule inserts a schwa between stem-initial consonants, preceding the stress vowel. This phonological process most often appears in the most difficult to articulate constant clusters, such as two stops.

/blay/ 'blood'/qbandu x̣le/ 'white oak tree'
→ bláy

→ bəláy

→ buláy

→qbándu x̣lé

→qəbándu x̣lé ~ qəbándu x̣ə

→qəbàndu x̣ə

Vowel lowering

This rule lowers /i/ and /u/ to /e/ and /o/, respectively. This lowering occurs morpheme-finally: /i/ lowering before /s/, /u/ before /cʹ/ and both /i/ and /u/ lowering before /l/.

/ca+mlu+l+t/ 'he ran around'/cʹi+mkʹu+cʹ+t/ 'those three are fighting each other'
→ cá+mlu+l+t

→ cá+mlu+li+t

→cá+mlo+li+t

→cámlolit

→ cʹí+mkʹu+cʹ+t

→ cʹí+mkʹu+cʹi+t

→ cʹí+mkʹo+cʹi+t

→cʹímkʹocʹit

Stop metathesis

This rule metathesizes the last two segments of the suffix -mkʹu- when it is directly preceded by a consonant.

/pʹutʹ+mkʹu+t/ 'they kissed each other'/mxex+mkʹu+tta+t/ 'the two of them swapped something'
→ pʹútʹ+mkʹu+t

→ pʹútʹ+mukʹ+t

→ pʹútʹ+mukʹi+t

→pʹútʹmukʹit

→ mxéx+mkʹu+tta+t

→ mxéx+mukʹ+tta+t

→ mxéx+mukʹ+ta+t

→mxéxmukʹtat

Morphology

Nouns

Noun morphology is significantly more limited than among verbs. However, there are still some cases of morphological rules.

Reduplication

There are some nouns that show reduplication. As noted by Moshinsky (1974), these nouns include derived verbs, and the semantic domains of small animals, plants and birds. Below are a few examples of nouns with reduplication in the Southeastern Pomo language:

  • qwáqwà cà 'kitchen, cookhouse'
  • qólqòl 'thunder'
  • wówò 'grandfather'
  • iméimè 'pneumonia'
  • lúlù 'flute'

Pronouns

Person:Number:Gender (in third person):Position with relation to speaker:Displacement:Case:
wi- first

ma- second

third

singular

-ay plural

-yi, -wi masculine

-med feminine

mi-, me- near—this

far—that

non-displaced

displaced

subject

-il object

-itib benefactive

-it+baq alienable possession

-it inalienable possession

Verbs

Verbs take a great variety of suffixes divided into many position classes. There are also instrumental prefixes that figure crucially in the use of many verb stems.

Position classes

Moshinsky (1974) identifies the following position classes; it can be seen that there is far more complexity in the set of suffixes than in the prefixes.

  • Prefixes
    • A — Directional
    • B — Instrumental
  • Root
Reduplicative Morphemes
  • HAB habitual
  • INST intensive
  • DISTR distributed
  • ITCOM iter. to comp.
  • PLS plural source
  • PLF plural figure
  • ITER iterative
Suffix Position 1
  • -b- intensive change
  • -š- forceful contact
  • -pʹ- with force
  • -t- iterative
  • -y- plural figure
Suffix Position 2 Directionals
  • -mlu- circulative
  • -qla- downward
  • -qlo-~-ql- upward
Suffix Position 3
  • -mg- down towards a surface
  • -qc- causative
  • -qp- non-singular
  • -qx- to away from
Suffix Position 4
  • -mi- iterative
  • -n- figure separation
Suffix Position 5
  • -mkʹu- reciprocal
  • -w- plural action
Suffix Position 6
  • -ki- inceptive
  • -kp- plural figure, source
  • -ks- semelfactive
Suffix Position 7
  • -mp- plural source
  • -ćx- to away
Suffix Position 8
  • -cʹr- reflexive
  • -kp- plural figure, source
Suffix Position 9
  • -l- durative
Suffix Position 10
  • -cʹp- plural action
  • -qc- causative
  • -qp- non-singular
  • -ki- inceptive
Suffix Position 11
  • -x̣ot- negative
Suffix Position 12
  • -tta- dual
Suffix Position 13

MODE

  • -d- potential
  • -dey- about to
  • -mlaʔm- almost
Suffix Position 14
MODE
  • -a imperative
  • -da future conditional
  • -dowa hortative
  • -hine imperfect optative
  • -kʹli inabilitive
  • -wa impersonal agent
ASPECT
  • -kle habitual
  • -s negative imperfect
  • -t positive imperfect
  • -ya perfective
Deverbalizers
  • -baq past passive part.
  • -m instr. or place nom.
  • -n absolutive
Conjoining Elements
  • -btonwa after
  • -day simultaneous
  • -fed conditional
  • -fla sequential
  • -qat when
  • -yukinʹ before-switch reference
  • -miṭ identical subj.
Interrogatives
  • -ʔe interrogative
  • -ʔha yes no interrogative
  • -we locative interrogative
Evidentials
  • -do quotative
  • -qʹo introspective
  • -ya visual
Mode
  • -y perfective optative

Reduplication

There are six verb affixes that are realized phonologically by reduplication, and they are as follows:

  1. Habitual (HAB)
  2. Intensive (INTS)
  3. Iterative (ITER)
  4. Iterative to Completion (ITCOM)
  5. Plural source of motion (PLS)
  6. Plural figure (PLF)

Many, but not all, verb stems that occur with reduplication can also occur without it. There are four reduplication rules for verbs (two of which are minor), that accompany the reduplicative morphemes in the above table.

Reduplication 1. Stem reduplication, (Directional Prefix) + (Instrumental Prefix) + Root → (DP)+(IP)+Root+(IP)+Root

  • /b+la+ITCOM+k+t/ → bláblàtkit 'lap it up'

Reduplication 2. Directional prefix + -o-

  • /qʹwo+ITCOM+t/ → qʹwóqʹwòt 'cough something up'

Reduplication 3. Stem-final Consonant Loss (minor rule)

  • /ʔ+loy+HAB+l+t/ → ʔlóylòlit 'he skins an animal every day'

Reduplication 4. Root+Suffix (minor rule), Root+Suffix → Root+Suffix+Root+Suffix

  • /ʔ+na+PLF+t/ → ʔnáʔnàt '1 ties 3 up'

Instrumental prefixes

Instrumental prefixes in Southeastern Pomo are significantly more limited than other Pomo languages. Moshinsky (1974) found that this is the result of a pre-Southeastern Pomo phonological rule which deleted an unstressed vowel that preceded the stressed root vowel, reducing in shape from CV- to C-. [4] Because many of the prefixes are now rather similar, there is reduced analyzability of their meanings. The instrumental prefixes are as follows:

  • ʔ- 'with the hand'
    • ʔbóʔkit 'pull a plant out of the ground'
  • ʔ- 'action by natural forces, by gravity'
    • ʔəbétit 'destroy, run out of'
  • ʔ- 'with one or more fingers or claws'
    • ʔlótit 'touch with the finger'
  • b- 'with a protrusion; with the mouth, tongue, beak; talking, eating'
    • bqóyit 'to chop something into two pieces'
  • b- 'handling a number of objects'
    • bʔélit 'gather food'
  • c- 'with the front end, by flowing water'
    • cdót 'see'
  • c- 'with a massive object, with a knife'
    • cqát 'he put it down'
  • cʹ- 'momentaneous, intensive action, projecting from a surface'
    • cʹlétit 'it's dripping'
  • f- 'with the end of a long object'
    • fádakʹit 'to dress a deer'
  • f- 'with the side of a long object, piercing'
    • fqʹálit 'knock nuts off a tree'
  • k- 'poking, piercing, pounding, squeezing, mashing'
    • kcát 'to kick'
  • m- 'with a projection at the end of a long object; with the fingers, with the butt of the hand, with the foot'
    • mdútkit 'squeeze with the fingers'
  • m- 'with internal energy; with heat, exploding, burning; with the emotions'
    • mhólkit 'wood turns to charcoals'
  • m- 'with the projected end of an object'
    • mpúkit 'to whistle, blow a whistle'
  • q- 'with a biting, scratching, tearing, mashing action'
    • qcékit 'to eat along with, in addition to'
  • s- 'cutting, slicing, shearing'
    • sqóyit 'cut with scissors; saw off"
  • s- 'with water'
    • swótkiqat 'dissolve'
  • š- 'with a long, often flexible object'
    • šbút 'weave a basket'
  • š- 'spreading out, stretching'
    • šmó 'foam'
  • x̣- 'break, undo'
    • x̣lókit 'unwind, tear down, erase'

As noted by Sally McLendon (1973), most of the prefixes are cognate with prefixes in Pomoan languages. [5] Among those that are not direct cognates with the prefixes in these other languages, they are highly related. An example of this with two languages in the Pomoan family is c- 'with the front end, by flowing water';, which is cognate with Kashaya /cû/ and may be related to Eastern Pomo /ku-/.

Syntax

Word order

While Moshinsky (1974) notes that Southeastern Pomo has a somewhat free word order, and that sentences are often generated in the neutral order, Southeastern Pomo is a largely SOV language. [6]

Some examples of this are as follows:

Object-Verb sentences are also exemplified in the Moshinsky grammar: [4]

Case marking

Southeastern Pomo is classified as a nominative-accusative in nature. Some examples of this syntactic feature, as noted by Bernard Comrie [7] are: [8]

Switch reference

Southeastern Pomo also has various switch references that come through in a number of sentences. The categories for each sentence type are outlined below with some examples of how they are used in Southeastern Pomo.

-fla 'sequential action', affixed to the verb of the first sentence

-yukin 'sequential actions, different subjects', this suffix conjoins sentences with sequentially occurring events but that have different subjects

-day 'simultaneous actions', this suffix conjoins sentences in which the actions are occurring simultaneously, and can include either the same or different subjects

-fed 'conditional', conjoins two sentences, when the second of which is conditional upon the first

-qat 'contingent actions', this suffix conjoins two sentences in which the actions occur either simultaneously or sequentially, and can be used when the subject is the same or differs between the sentences

-miṭ 'contingent actions, same subject', conjoins two sentences with the same subject in which the actions are connected or simultaneous

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shoshoni language</span> Uto-Aztecan language spoken in western US

Shoshoni, also written as Shoshoni-Gosiute and Shoshone, is a Numic language of the Uto-Aztecan family, spoken in the Western United States by the Shoshone people. Shoshoni is primarily spoken in the Great Basin, in areas of Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Idaho.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tunica language</span> Extinct language isolate of the Mississippi Valley

The Tunica or Luhchi Yoroni language is a language isolate that was spoken in the Central and Lower Mississippi Valley in the United States by Native American Tunica peoples. There are no native speakers of the Tunica language, but there were 32 second-language speakers in 2017, and as of 2023, there are 60 second-language speakers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Klallam language</span> Dormant Salishan language of North America

Klallam,Clallam, Ns'Klallam or S'klallam, is a Straits Salishan language historically spoken by the Klallam people at Becher Bay on Vancouver Island in British Columbia and across the Strait of Juan de Fuca on the north coast of the Olympic Peninsula in Washington. The last native speaker of Klallam as a first language died in 2014, but there is a growing group of speakers of Klallam as a second language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tonkawa language</span> Native American language

The Tonkawa language was spoken in Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico by the Tonkawa people. A language isolate, with no known related languages, Tonkawa has not had L1 speakers since the mid 1900s. Most Tonkawa people now only speak English, but revitalization is underway.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quechan language</span> Yuman language spoken in California and Arizona

Quechan or Kwtsaan, also known as Yuma, is the native language of the Quechan people of southeastern California and southwestern Arizona in the Lower Colorado River Valley and Sonoran Desert. Despite its name, it is not related to the Quechua language of the Andes.

Wintu is a Wintu language which was spoken by the Wintu people of Northern California. It was the northernmost member of the Wintun family of languages. The Wintun family of languages was spoken in the Shasta County, Trinity County, Sacramento River Valley and in adjacent areas up to the Carquinez Strait of San Francisco Bay. Wintun is a branch of the hypothetical Penutian language phylum or stock of languages of western North America, more closely related to four other families of Penutian languages spoken in California: Maiduan, Miwokan, Yokuts, and Costanoan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comanche language</span> Uto-Aztecan language spoken by the Comanche people in the United States

Comanche is a Uto-Aztecan language spoken by the Comanche, who split from the Shoshone soon after the Comanche had acquired horses around 1705. The Comanche language and the Shoshoni language are quite similar, but certain consonant changes in Comanche have inhibited mutual intelligibility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natchez language</span> Extinct indigenous language of Mississippi and Louisiana

The Natchez language is the ancestral language of the Natchez people who historically inhabited Mississippi and Louisiana, and who now mostly live among the Muscogee and Cherokee peoples in Oklahoma. The language is considered to be either unrelated to other indigenous languages of the Americas or distantly related to the Muskogean languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eastern Pomo language</span> Pomoan language

Eastern Pomo, also known as Clear Lake Pomo, is a nearly extinct Pomoan language spoken around Clear Lake in Lake County, California by one of the Pomo peoples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kashaya language</span> Native American language

Kashaya is the critically endangered language of the Kashia band of the Pomo people. The Pomoan languages have been classified as part of the Hokan language family. The name Kashaya corresponds to words in neighboring languages with meanings such as "skillful" and "expert gambler". It is spoken by the Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheria.

The Ojibwe language is an Algonquian North American indigenous language spoken throughout the Great Lakes region and westward onto the northern plains. It is one of the largest indigenous language north of Mexico in terms of number of speakers, and exhibits a large number of divergent dialects. For the most part, this article describes the Minnesota variety of the Southwestern dialect. The orthography used is the Fiero Double-Vowel System.

The Shuswap language is a northern Interior Salish language traditionally spoken by the Shuswap people of British Columbia. An endangered language, Shuswap is spoken mainly in the Central and Southern Interior of British Columbia between the Fraser River and the Rocky Mountains. According to the First Peoples' Cultural Council, 200 people speak Shuswap as a mother tongue, and there are 1,190 semi-speakers.

The Yimas language is spoken by the Yimas people, who populate the Sepik River Basin region of Papua New Guinea. It is spoken primarily in Yimas village, Karawari Rural LLG, East Sepik Province. It is a member of the Lower-Sepik language family. All 250-300 speakers of Yimas live in two villages along the lower reaches of the Arafundi River, which stems from a tributary of the Sepik River known as the Karawari River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tiipai language</span> Yuman language spoken in Mexico and US

Tiipai (Tipay) is a Native American language belonging to the Delta–California branch of the Yuman language family, which spans Arizona, California, and Baja California. As part of the Yuman family, Tiipai has also been consistently included in the controversial quasi-stock Hokan. Tiipai is spoken by a number of Kumeyaay tribes in northern Baja California and southern San Diego County, California. There were, conservatively, 200 Tiipai speakers in the early 1990s; the number of speakers has since declined steadily, numbering roughly 100 speakers in Baja California in a 2007 survey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nukak language</span> Endangered indigenous language of Colombia

The Nukak language is a language of uncertain classification, perhaps part of the macrofamily Puinave-Maku. It is very closely related to Kakwa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paya language</span> Chibchan language of Honduras

Pech or Pesh is a Chibchan language spoken in Honduras. It was formerly known as Paya, and continues to be referred to in this manner by several sources, though there are negative connotations associated with this term. It has also been referred to as Seco. There are 300 speakers according to Yasugi (2007). It is spoken near the north-central coast of Honduras, in the Dulce Nombre de Culmí municipality of Olancho Department.

The Kwaio language, or Koio, is spoken in the centre of Malaita Island in the Solomon Islands. It is spoken by about 13,000 people.

Maia is a Papuan language spoken in the Madang Province of Papua New Guinea, and is a member of the Trans-New Guinea language family. It has a language endangerment status of 6a, which means that it is a vigorous and sustainable language spoken by all generations. According to a 2000 census, there are approximately 4,500 living speakers of the language, who are split between twenty-two villages in the Almani district of the Bogia sub-district.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ute dialect</span> Colorado River Numic dialect used in the US

Ute is a dialect of the Colorado River Numic language, spoken by the Ute people. Speakers primarily live on three reservations: Uintah-Ouray in northeastern Utah, Southern Ute in southwestern Colorado, and Ute Mountain in southwestern Colorado and southeastern Utah. Ute is part of the Numic branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family. Other dialects in this dialect chain are Chemehuevi and Southern Paiute. As of 2010, there were 1,640 speakers combined of all three dialects Colorado River Numic. Ute's parent language, Colorado River Numic, is classified as a threatened language, although there are tribally-sponsored language revitalization programs for the dialect.

Lala, Nara, or Pokau is an Austronesian language of the central southern coast of the Papuan Peninsula in Papua New Guinea. This language is spoken in the villages of Oloi, Diumana, Ala'ala, Tubu, Kaiau and Vanuamae. A count in 2017 showed there to be about 3000 speakers with a current language status of developing, meaning that the language is in vigorous use, with literature in a standardized form being used by some.

References

  1. As of 2009, there is only one remaining fluent native speaker, Loretta Kelsey. "Last living speaker works to keep NorCal tribe's language alive". www.azstarnet.com. Retrieved February 12, 2009.
  2. Kevin Fagan (September 29, 2007). "Only living Elem Pomo speaker teaches so she won't be the last". SFGate. Retrieved August 17, 2012.
  3. Lonny Shavelson (March 30, 2006). "California's Elém Pomo Tribe Tries to Save Its Language". VOA News. Retrieved August 17, 2012.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Moshinsky, Julius (1974). A Grammar of Southeastern Pomo. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  5. McLendon, Sally. (1973). Proto Pomo. Univ. of Calif. Press. ISBN   0-520-09444-1. OCLC   185287286.
  6. "The languages of native America: historical and comparative assessment". Lingua. 59 (2–3): 275–291. February 1983. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(83)90066-9. ISSN   0024-3841.
  7. "Department of Linguistics – Director". Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology . Leipzig Germany. Archived from the original on January 22, 2008. Retrieved July 5, 2023.
  8. "WALS Online - Datapoint Pomo (Southeastern) / Alignment of Case Marking of Full Noun Phrases". wals.info. Retrieved March 4, 2020.