1973 Australian price control referendum

Last updated

Australian Price Control referendum, 1973
Flag of Australia (converted).svg
8 December 1973 (1973-12-08)
"Do you approve the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled "An Act to alter the Constitution so as to enable the Australian Parliament to control prices"?
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes3,089,13943.81%
Light brown x.svg No3,962,09356.19%
Valid votes7,051,23298.65%
Invalid or blank votes96,1351.35%
Total votes7,147,367100.00%
Registered voters/turnout7,653,46993.39%
Results of 1973 Prices referendum Australia.png
Results by state
Note: Darkness of colour denotes strength of vote

The Constitution Alteration (Prices) 1973 was a bill proposing amendments to section 51 of the Australian Constitution which would give the Commonwealth legislative power over prices. The proposed changes to the constitution were not upheld, with Australians voting against the constitutional alteration. [1]

Contents

The Whitlam government proposed the amendments to the constitution reasoning that by granting increased power to federal government over prices they would be able to control inflation, which at the time was increasing significantly. [2] [3] However, it was ultimately determined by the voters that this was an unnecessary intervention by government, with concerns raised about the future possibility of the abuse of such powers. [4] [3]

Background

Economic context

The economic context that led to the eventual proposition of the 1973 Prices Referendum was driven by numerous economic factors. A resource boom derived from the demands of Japanese industrialisation and increased capital inflows due to the Australian dollar being perceived as undervalued drove Australia's economy in the early 1970s. [5] These factors contributed to an economic environment in 1971 that was generally considered strong, [6] with the AUD rising to $1.40, unemployment at 2% and economic growth rising 5% per year.

However, in the same period, inflation rose steadily to 7.3% as average weekly earnings rose to over 10% per annum. [7] Australia's inflation post World War II averaged around 2%. Therefore, this increase in inflation was very significant at the time. [5] Fiscal policy was expansionary with concerns over the slow rise of unemployment. The Whitlam Labor government announced tax cuts, along with spending on education, health, urban development and the environment. [7] Additionally, Whitlam's government supported pay rises, improvements in working conditions and gender equality in income. This led to an increase in minimum wage for women from 75% to 100% of the corresponding male wage. [5]

In 1973, average weekly earnings had increased to 15.3% driven by wage decisions and consequently the inflation rate began to push double figures. [8] In October 1973, the Arab-Israel conflict quadrupled world oil prices, triggering global high unemployment and high inflation or "stagflation". [5] Australia's own inflation rate rose to 10.1% in 1973. [8]

Then-Prime Minister Gough Whitlam Gough Whitlam 1972 (cropped).jpg
Then-Prime Minister Gough Whitlam

Political context

By 1973, Gough Whitlam's government was under growing pressure to slow the rising inflation. Snedden's Liberal party opposition accused Whitlam of allowing inflation to get out of control, while instead spending extensively on social issues like education and health. [9] They also criticised Labor as hypocritical, because as the opposition Labor scrutinised the Liberal government for not acting on inflation which at the time was in a more stable state. [10]

Whitlam argued the Labor Party had inherited 'stagflation' from the previous government [11] who had instigated wage rises and created circumstances for an overvalued dollar. [12] Whitlam offered several policies to address the issue, such as famously cutting tariffs by 25% across the board. [12] In August 1973, Whitlam introduced legislation that established the Prices Justification Tribunal, which ultimately scrutinised price changes by large corporations. Although this provided the federal government with some general powers on pricing, the Prices Justification Tribunal was not given the power to act on decisions found from their enquiries. [13] Opponents of the tribunal criticised its ineffectiveness, arguing that the tribunal had no real power in effecting market prices and thus curbing inflation. The ineffective nature of the tribunal was under fire with Snedden ironically calling it the Prices "Exemption" Tribunal. [14] However, supporters of the tribunal argued that it was effective in holding back price rises. [15] The first Prices Justification Tribunal Annual Report identified the difference between prices originally proposed to the tribunal and the prices found to be justified by the tribunal was $253 million. [16] Additionally, the existence of the tribunal made companies more cautious about price rises, although the effect of this is unquantifiable. [15] In a ploy to boost the effectiveness of the tribunal and silence critics, Whitlam on 22 September proposed the Prices Referendum that sought to give power to Australian Parliament to control prices as one element in an anti-inflationary strategy. [17]

Question

The question appeared on the ballot paper as:

Do you approve the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled "An Act to alter the Constitution so as to enable the Australian Parliament to control prices"?

Public opinion polls

Numerous polls were published before the referendum by reputable polling organisations. Overwhelmingly, these public opinion polls predicted that voting intentions were to affirm the referendum.

A poll published in The Age on 6 December predicted: [18]

YesNoUndecided
Opinion poll54.6%39.8%5.6%

Another poll was taken by the McNair Gallup Poll on 23 October, which was published in The Herald. It must be noted that this poll was taken early in the referendum campaign and thus may not have captured accurate public voting intentions. The poll predicted: [18]

YesNoUndecided
Opinion poll70%27%3%

Morgan Polls published a poll in The Bulletin in mid-November. This poll predicted: [18]

YesNoUndecided
Opinion poll57%28%15%

Arguments for and against

Major political parties

The referendum was debated primarily on party lines, with Whitlam's Labor Party proposing the "Yes" case and Snedden's Liberal Party proposing the "No" case.

Whitlam's "Yes" case can be summarised into three arguments: [17]

  1. For the government to be effective in fighting inflation, it must have every possible weapon at its disposal to effectively curb inflation. [3]
  2. The government should have the power to prevent, where necessary and logical, at times of global economic uncertainty the excessive rise of prices in essential commodities. [3]
  3. It is logical that power over prices are exercised by the federal government and not by state government. State government have historically been unable and unwilling to utilise its power over prices in an effective manner. [3]
Billy Snedden, Leader of the Opposition Billy Snedden 1973 (1).jpg
Billy Snedden, Leader of the Opposition

Snedden's "No" case can be summarised into three arguments:

  1. The uncertain economic circumstance is being taken advantage by government to get a power that has the potential to change the social and economic circumstances of Australia. [4] A "No" vote would safeguard federalism, ensuring that an already centralist government would not gain additional power, which is essential in maintaining democracy and individual liberty. [4] This was an especially potent argument with the Watergate scandal at its height, raising the level of scrutiny on governments globally. [2]
  2. There is no evidence that giving government power over prices will prove an effective tool in curbing inflation. Additionally, the government have been ambiguous and secretive of details in how it intends to use this power. [3] [4]
  3. The opposition proposed differing policy in curbing inflation. The policy was threefold; pulling back public sector spending, a temporary freeze on incomes and prices and a national conference of federal and state governments, unions and employer organisations to agree on a plan to fight inflation. [19]

A Melbourne-based newspaper, The Age, summarised the debate: "If you hate inflation, love your country and trust Gough Whitlam, vote "yes"... If you hate controls, fear the unknown and believe Bill Snedden, vote "no"..." [18]

Minor parties

Other minor party stances included support for the proposal by the Australia Party and Aarons Communist Party. Opposition to the proposed changes were supported by the Democratic Labour Party and Maoists. [18]

Organised groups

Groups other than political parties took clear sides in regard to the proposal outside of Parliament. It is a common occurrence for organised groups to participate actively in referendums, where they usually would not in general elections. [18]

Trade unions such as the ACTU and Queensland Trades and Labour Unions along with other unions generally advocated in favour of the proposed change. [18] Strong public opposition to the proposed changes came from organisations that considered the governments control of prices a direct threat to their industry. Such organisations included the Chamber of Commerce, Chamber of Manufacturers, Real Estate Institutes, the Wool Growers and Grazer’s Association, the NSW Institute of Public Affairs and various other organisations that had a vested interest in the proposal. [18]

Results

Result  [20]
StateElectoral rollBallots issuedForAgainstInformal
Vote %Vote %
New South Wales2,827,9892,618,6731,257,49948.551,332,48551.4528,689
Victoria2,129,4942,001,924891,14445.181,081,12054.8229,660
Queensland1,128,4171,055,299402,50638.47643,77061.539,023
South Australia737,573700,333282,75441.16404,18158.8413,398
Western Australia588,789542,122169,60531.90362,12168.1010,396
Tasmania241,207229,01685,63138.22138,41661.784,969
Total for Commonwealth7,653,4697,147,3673,089,13943.813,962,09356.1996,135
ResultsObtained majority in no state and an overall minority of 872,954 votes.Not carried

Before the 1977 Australian Referendum citizens living in Australian Territories were not able to vote in referendums.

Aftermath

Prices Justification Tribunal

Following the failed referendum in 1974 Whitlam further strengthened the powers of the Prices Justification Tribunal. [13] The power was extended so that the tribunal could inquire and report on prices charged by a company irrespective of their annual turnover. [13] Where previously the tribunal could only inquire and report on companies with annual turnover of $20 million or more. These changes were aimed at examining retail prices and the price of imported goods, which were previously not examined by the tribunal. [13] [15] However, the jurisdiction of the tribunal was not extended to make the findings of inquiries mandatory for companies to comply with. [21] Therefore, the tribunal was scrutinised for lacking the appropriate power to make real economic differences. [21] Additionally, separate legislation that gave pricing power to state governments such as New South Wales, South Australia, Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory meant that giving the tribunal further power over prices would contradict this existing legislation. [13]

Malcolm Fraser, the 22nd Prime Minister of Australia Fraser Malcolm BANNER.jpg
Malcolm Fraser, the 22nd Prime Minister of Australia

The coverage and role of the Prices Justification Tribunal was reduced, as Fraser's Liberal party took office in 1975. In addition to scrutiny over the ineffective nature of the tribunal, concerns were raised about compliance costs, the overlapping of the tribunals operations with existing government bodies and the effect of the tribunal on industry efficiency and investment decisions. [21] The tribunal was ultimately abolished in 1981. [13]

Economic policy

The rejection of the referendum and the ultimate reduction of the Prices Justification Tribunal, meant that other economic policies took greater credence. [13] As such two key economic policies were adopted; monetary targeting and indexation.

Following the global trend of inflation targeting, the Reserve Bank of Australia employed a loose form of monetary targeting. [5] The policy objective was to reduce the rate of increase in domestic prices. From 1976 to 1985, between which monetary targeting was employed, the inflation rate decreased from 13% to 8.4%. [5] Although the decline in inflation would suggest this policy was a success, the policy relied on a consistent and stable relationship between growth rates and price changes. [22] However, this period proved this consistent relationship was not the case suggesting a causal link between the decrease in domestic prices and monetary targeting. [22] This led to the RBA's ultimate transition to inflation targeting. [5]

Indexation was adopted by the Arbitration Commission in 1975, on the basis that it would restrain wage increases. [5] Indexation linked wage increases to past price increases. [23] Inflation began to decrease with the establishment of indexation, decreasing from a peak of nearly 20% in 1975 to 10% by 1977. [5] This showed the effectiveness of wage indexation in constraining wage increases. [23] However, after 1977 wages rapidly increased due to pressure from unions who argued that wage increases were falling behind cost of living increases. [5] [23] The Arbitration Commission was unable to keep relevant parties in agreement with its indexation approach. As such indexation was abolished in 1981. [5]

Although these policies had contributed to decreasing the inflation rate to 10% in 1977, further success proved difficult. In 1977 Australia experienced high economic growth and rising oil prices which forced an increase in inflation before it was back under control. [5]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gough Whitlam</span> Prime Minister of Australia from 1972 to 1975

Edward Gough Whitlam was the 21st prime minister of Australia, serving from 1972 to 1975. He held office as the leader of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), of which he was the longest-serving. He was notable for being the head of a reformist and socially progressive administration that ended with his removal as prime minister after controversially being dismissed by the governor-general of Australia, Sir John Kerr, at the climax of the 1975 constitutional crisis. Whitlam is the only Australian prime minister to have been removed from office by the governor-general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Malcolm Fraser</span> Prime Minister of Australia from 1975 to 1983

John Malcolm Fraser was an Australian politician who served as the 22nd prime minister of Australia from 1975 to 1983. He held office as the leader of the Liberal Party of Australia.

In economics, stagflation or recession-inflation is a situation in which the inflation rate is high or increasing, the economic growth rate slows, and unemployment remains steadily high. It presents a dilemma for economic policy, since actions intended to lower inflation may exacerbate unemployment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inflation</span> Devaluation of currency over a period of time

In economics, inflation is a general increase in the prices of goods and services in an economy. This is usually measured using the consumer price index (CPI). When the general price level rises, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services; consequently, inflation corresponds to a reduction in the purchasing power of money. The opposite of CPI inflation is deflation, a decrease in the general price level of goods and services. The common measure of inflation is the inflation rate, the annualized percentage change in a general price index. As prices faced by households do not all increase at the same rate, the consumer price index (CPI) is often used for this purpose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reserve Bank of Australia</span> Central bank of Australia

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is Australia's central bank and banknote issuing authority. It has had this role since 14 January 1960, when the Reserve Bank Act 1959 removed the central banking functions from the Commonwealth Bank.

Incomes policies in economics are economy-wide wage and price controls, most commonly instituted as a response to inflation, and usually seeking to establish wages and prices below free market level.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1967 Australian referendum (Aboriginals)</span> 1967 constitutional referendum on the legal status of Indigenous Australians

The second question of the 1967 Australian referendum of 27 May 1967, called by the Holt government, related to Indigenous Australians. Voters were asked whether to give the Commonwealth Parliament the power to make special laws for Indigenous Australians in states, and whether Indigenous Australians should be included in official population counts for constitutional purposes. The term "the Aboriginal Race" was used in the question.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1973 Australian incomes referendum</span> Constitutional referendum

The Constitution Alteration (Incomes) 1973 was a referendum proposed by the Australian Labor Party in December 1973 which sought to alter section 51 of the Australian Constitution to give the Commonwealth legislative power over incomes. The Whitlam government's most prominent reason for posing this amendment was the issue of inflation, as they argued that with government power over incomes, inflation would be better managed.

The Constitution Alteration Bill 1974 was an unsuccessful proposal to alter the Australian Constitution to make population instead of electors, the basis of determining the average size of electorates in each state. It applied not only to the House of Representatives, but also to the various state Legislative Assemblies, requiring the use demographical population size to ensure democratic elections. This was intended to replace alternative methods of distributing seats, such as geographical size, with instead the population of states and territories. It was put to voters for approval in a referendum held on 18 May 1974.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whitlam government</span> Australian government, 1972–75

The Whitlam government was the federal executive government of Australia led by Prime Minister Gough Whitlam of the Australian Labor Party. The government commenced when Labor defeated the McMahon government at the 1972 federal election, ending a record 23 years of continuous Coalition government. It was terminated by Governor-General Sir John Kerr following the 1975 constitutional crisis and was succeeded by the Fraser government—the sole occasion in Australian history when an elected federal government was dismissed by the governor-general.

The Prices and Incomes Accord was a series of agreements between the Australian Labor Party (ALP) and the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), in effect from 1983 to 1996. Central to these agreements was an incomes policy to address the stagflation crisis by restraining wages. The unions agreed to restrict their wage demands, and in exchange, the government provided a 'social wage' of welfare and tax cuts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1974 Australian federal election</span> Election in Australia

The 1974 Australian federal election was held in Australia on 18 May 1974. All 127 seats in the House of Representatives and all 60 seats in the Senate were up for election, due to a double dissolution. The incumbent Labor Party led by Prime Minister Gough Whitlam defeated the opposition Liberal–Country coalition led by Billy Snedden. This marked the first time that a Labor leader won two consecutive elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1972 Australian federal election</span> Election

The 1972 Australian federal election was held in Australia on 2 December 1972. All 125 seats in the House of Representatives were up for election, as well as a single Senate seat in Queensland. The incumbent Liberal–Country coalition government, led by Prime Minister William McMahon, was defeated by the opposition Labor Party led by Gough Whitlam. Labor's victory ended 23 years of successive Coalition governments that began in 1949 and started the three-year Whitlam Labor Government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian property bubble</span>

The Australian property bubble is the economic theory that the Australian property market has become or is becoming significantly overpriced and due for a significant downturn. Since the early 2010s, various commentators, including one Treasury official, have claimed the Australian property market is in a significant bubble.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1973–1975 recession</span> Period of economic stagnation in the Western world

The 1973–1975 recession or 1970s recession was a period of economic stagnation in much of the Western world during the 1970s, putting an end to the overall post–World War II economic expansion. It differed from many previous recessions by involving stagflation, in which high unemployment and high inflation existed simultaneously.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fraser government</span> Australian government, 1975–1983

The Fraser government was the federal executive government of Australia led by Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser. It was made up of members of a Liberal–Country party coalition in the Australian Parliament from November 1975 to March 1983. Initially appointed as a caretaker government following the dismissal of the Whitlam government, Fraser won in a landslide at the resulting 1975 Australian federal election, and won substantial majorities at the subsequent 1977 and 1980 elections, before losing to the Bob Hawke–led Australian Labor Party in the 1983 election.

The Periods of Stagflation, also known as Stagflation in Pakistan or inflation and unemployment in Pakistan, are periods of economic stagflation in Pakistan's economic history, which has affected Pakistan's economic trajectory since its inception. Pakistan's economy is battling a state of virtual "stagflation", means that Pakistan is grappling with the challenging conditions of sluggish economic activity, rising unemployment and rising inflation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Department of Labour (Australia)</span> Australian government department, 1972–1974

The Department of Labour was an Australian government department that existed between December 1972 and June 1974. This department was created and operated under the Whitlam government, with Clyde Cameron appointed as minister. The Department of Labour was a catalyst for the increase in the national minimum wage and pushed for the equalising of pay rates between men and women. During this period, Cameron pushed for paid maternity and annual leave. They also worked to reduce the number of industrial disputes for the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission. Many attribute the department's employment of wage indexation policies as a contributing factor to the 1975 economic recession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1976 sterling crisis</span> Situation of prolonged doubt in the strength of Britains currency

The 1976 sterling crisis was a currency crisis in the United Kingdom. Inflation, a balance of payments deficit, a public spending deficit, and the 1973 oil crisis were contributors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Premiership of Pierre Trudeau</span>

Pierre Trudeau's tenure as prime minister of Canada occurred from April 20, 1968, to June 4, 1979, and from March 3, 1980, to June 30, 1984. He was sworn in as prime minister two weeks after he succeeded Prime Minister Lester Pearson as leader of the Liberal Party in the 1968 leadership election.

References

  1. ↑ "Referendum dates and results". Australian Electoral Commission. 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  2. 1 2 Keir, W (2009). "Voter Behaviour and Constitutional Change in Australia Since 1967 (PhD)" (PDF). Retrieved 20 October 2021– via Queensland University of Technology.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Part 2 - History of Australian Referendums" (PDF). House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs. 1997. pp. 95–97. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Lyons, M., & Khoshaba, T. (2009). Pragmatism, Principles and Policy: Federalism and Industrial Relations Regulation in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(2), 173-194. doi : 10.1177/0022185608101706
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stevens, G (1992). "Inflation and Disinflation in Australia: 1950-91". RBA 1992 Conference. Sydney: RBA. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  6. ↑ MacFarlane, I (18 November 2006). "How 'stagflation' killed Golden Age". The Sydney Morning Herald . Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  7. 1 2 Colebatch, T (1 January 2005). "The year the economy went 'bung'". The Age . Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  8. 1 2 Boehm, E., & Martin, V. (1989). An Investigation into the Major Causes 01 Australia's Recent Inflation and Some Policy Implications. Economic Record, 65(1), 1-15. doi : 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1989.tb00673.x
  9. ↑ Paul, J (1974). "Political Review" (PDF). The Australian Quarterly. 1 (1): 116–128. doi:10.2307/20634620. JSTOR   20634620 . Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  10. ↑ Fairbairn, D. E. (12 September 1973). "Second Reading (Budget Debate)" (PDF). Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . Commonwealth of Australia: House of Representatives. pp. 869–872. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  11. ↑ Whitlam, E. G. (17 September 1973). "Second Reading Speech, Prices Referendum Bill" (PDF). Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . Commonwealth of Australia: House of Representatives. pp. 1055–1057. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  12. 1 2 Bayari, Celal (2012). Australian economy and neo-liberalism (1st ed.). Hamburg, Germany: Lit Verlag. pp. 77–80. ISBN   9783643902276..
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. (2000). "Submission to the Productivity Commission Review of the Prices Surveillance Act 1983" (PDF). pp. 16–27. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  14. ↑ Snedden, M. B. (22 October 1973). "Question time Prices Justification Act" (PDF). Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . Commonwealth of Australia: House of Representatives. pp. 2410–2411. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  15. 1 2 3 Parsons, P (1975). "Prices Justification in Australia—The First Twenty Months". Federal Law Review. 6 (3): 367–396. doi:10.1177/0067205X7500600301. S2CID   189077467.. (1974-1975) 6(3) Federal Law Review 367. doi : 10.1177/0067205x7500600301
  16. ↑ Prices Justification Tribunal, First annual report for year 1973-74, Parliamentary paper no. 155 of 1974, Canberra, p. 19, ISSN   0311-4813 , retrieved 20 October 2021– via Trove
  17. 1 2 Whitlam, E. G. (1973b) 'The Case for "YES"’, The Age (5 December), Whitlam Institute, University of Western Sydney
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Rydon, J. (1974). Prices and incomes referendum 1973: The pattern off failure. Politics, 9(1), 22-30. doi : 10.1080/00323267408401432
  19. ↑ Snedden, M. B. (1973a) Debate at the National Press Club Luncheon, 6 December 1973, Whitlam Institute, University of Western Sydney
  20. ↑ Handbook of the 44th Parliament (2014) "Part 5 - Referendums and Plebiscites - Referendum results". Parliamentary Library of Australia.
  21. 1 2 3 Officer, R. (1976). The Prices Justification Tribunal: Retrospect and Prospect. Australian Journal of Management, 1(1), 57-72. doi : 10.1177/031289627600100103
  22. 1 2 Cord, R., & Hammond, D. (2016). Milton Friedman: Contributions to Economics and Public Policy (1st ed., pp. 334-356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. 1 2 3 Gregory, R. (1986). Wages Policy and Unemployment in Australia. Economica, 53(210), S53-S74. doi : 10.2307/2554374
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.